DOCSLIB.ORG

References on the Need for Veto Restraint by the UN Security Council in Mass Atrocity Situations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
References on the Need for Veto Restraint by the UN Security Council in Mass Atrocity Situations References on the need for veto restraint by the UN Security Council in mass atrocity situations INTRODUCTION support of the statement.2 At the same time, the ACT Group launched a draft “Code of Conduct regarding Security Council action against genocide, crimes against There have been increasing calls by United Nations humanity or war crimes.” As of 23 October, 103 states (UN) member states for there to be restraint on the use and 1 UN Observer have signed on to the Code of of the veto by the permanent members of the UN Conduct.3 Security Council in mass atrocity situations. In total, 123 states, representing 63 percent of total UN French President Francois Hollande increased the membership, have supported the restraint on the veto in visibility of these calls in September 2013 at the 68th mass atrocity situations through their public statements opening of the UN General Assembly, when he proposed or signatures on the France/Mexico and/or ACT Group a “code of conduct” by which permanent members initiatives. would withhold their right to veto in any mass atrocity situation. MINISTERIAL SIDE-EVENT ON A CODE This summary collates references made to restraint on OF CONDUCT REGARDING SECURITY the use of the veto by member states in various UN fora COUNCIL ACTION AGAINST GENOCIDE, since 2008. During the 29 meetings covered in this CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY OR WAR summary, 84 states from all regions of the world, CRIMES representing 44 percent of the total UN membership, 1 October 2015 Australia, Benin, Chile, have supported the call for restraint on the use of the (28) Croatia, Czech Republic, 1 veto in mass atrocity situations. Liechtenstein was the Estonia, Finland, France, most vocal supporter, discussing the veto 19 times. Georgia, Guatemala, Twenty-seven other states discussed the veto five or Hungary, Japan, Latvia, more times. Among the 25 members of the Liechtenstein, Lithuania, New Accountability, Coherence and Transparency (ACT) Zealand, Norway, Qatar, group, 23 have individually called for restraint on the Singapore, Slovenia, Spain, use of the veto in various fora, while Liechtenstein, Sweden, Switzerland, Maldives and Switzerland have delivered a statements Thailand, Trinidad and on behalf of the entire group. Tobago, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States During the opening of the 70th UN General Assembly the governments of France and Mexico presented a For statements from this event, please see the Global “Political statement on the suspension of the veto in case Centre’s webpage for UN Security Council veto reform. of mass atrocities,” open to signature by UN member states. As of 23 October, 80 states have signed in theoretical option. We call on all permanent members of MINISTERIAL SIDE-EVENT ON the Council to declare it forthwith.” REGULATING THE VETO IN MASS ATROCITY SITUATIONS New Zealand 30 September Czech Republic, France, 2015 (10) Guatemala, Indonesia, “New Zealand deeply regrets that the efforts that we and Liechtenstein, Mexico, the others made over a considerable period to try to ensure Netherlands, Senegal, Spain that this commemorative event would be marked by a and Tunisia united Council did not prove possible. While acknowledging the relevant provisions of the Charter of For statements from this event, please see the Global the United Nations, since 1945 New Zealand has Centre’s webpage for UN Security Council veto reform. consistently opposed the veto. New Zealand regrets that despite achieving the support of a majority of Council members, the draft resolution was not adopted because of the exercise of a veto by one of the permanent UN SECURITY COUNCIL BRIEFING ON members. At a commemorative event, it strikes us THE “SITUATION IN BOSNIA AND particularly inappropriate that a veto was used. While it was only one negative vote, the outcome reflects on all of HERZEGOVINA us. It once more demonstrates how we must all find 8 July 2015 (5) Chile, France, Lithuania, New better ways of working to ensure that the Council can Zealand, Spain reach agreement and act when it should.” Spain Chile “Vetoing such an initiative represents two steps “We would like to reiterate our call upon those countries backwards in the Organization’s efforts to support that have the right of the veto to refrain from using it in progress in terms of the responsibility to protect our situations of crimes against humanity, war crimes, citizens and in limiting the use of the veto for atrocity genocide or ethnic cleansing. Otherwise, the Council is crimes.” left powerless to defend the values and principles that are the most fundamental for humankind. We urge the Security Council, in particular its permanent members, UN SECURITY COUNCIL OPEN DEBATE: to assume that responsibility.” MAINTAINING INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY France 23 February Albania, Algeria, Australia, 2015 Belgium, Bosnia and “In Syria, crimes against humanity and war crimes are (22 states Herzegovina, Chad, Costa committed every day before our eyes, and the Security speaking on Rica, Estonia, France, Georgia, Council remains paralyzed. In such critical situations, behalf of 36) Guatemala, Indonesia, Latvia, the Council must be able to respond and assume its Liechtenstein, Maldives (on responsibilities. It is to that end that France is pushing behalf of the ACT Group), for the five permanent members to voluntarily commit Mexico, Netherlands, New to renouncing the use of the veto in cases of mass Zealand, Papua New Guinea, crimes. The use of the veto is not a privilege; it is a Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland responsibility. It is therefore up to the permanent members first of all to show that they are responsible within the framework of the Council.” Albania Lithuania “Worse, the use of the veto in such cases betrays the “Far too often lack of political will and divisions have trust of millions of people for whom the United Nations stood in the way of decisive action, including on the part is the only hope. It openly neglects and despises victims. of the Council. Let me be clear: restraint in the use of the It empowers dictators and other serious human rights veto in mass atrocity situations should not remain a offenders, and undermines international efforts to end impunity. In that respect, Albania reiterates its strong Chad support for the French proposal and the efforts of ACT for a code of conduct on refraining from the use of veto “The sometimes abusive recourse to force and the right in situations of genocide, war crimes, crimes against of the veto at the Security Council diminishes to zero the humanity and ethnic cleansing.” efforts of the Council and prevents it from achieving its objectives. The world still remembers the failures of the Algeria Organization in resolving the Palestinian issue and in preventing and managing mass crimes, such as in “Thirdly, the use of veto power is not compatible with Rwanda, Bosnia and Herzegovina and other more recent the open societies that we look forward to building, and examples, such as in Syria.” obviously Algeria welcomes the ideas aimed at limiting its application, as a first step.” Costa Rica Australia “Costa Rica, first as part of the group of five small nations and now as part of the ACT group, has opposed “We welcome France’s initiative on restraint in use of the use of the veto, especially in situations of genocide, the veto in situations of mass atrocity, and we encourage crimes against humanity and war crimes. We support further progress on this important initiative. The the French proposal of a code of conduct on the use of credibility of the United Nations system depends on its the veto and call on the permanent members to adopt a willingness and capacity to protect civilians, particularly declaration of principles to mark the seventieth women and children who suffer disproportionately in anniversary of the Organization.” conflict.” Estonia Belgium “Far too often, history has shown us how the distinct “The use of the veto — for example, to block the privilege of the veto, or even just the threat of using it, adoption of resolutions on the situation in Syria — is an has been abused, leaving the Security Council paralysed unfortunate illustration of the shortfalls of the system and passive on the sidelines in situations where it is and a failure of the Council to shoulder its most most needed. The saddest example of that is the four- fundamental responsibilities. That is why Belgium fully year long, ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Syria. supports France’s initiative in favour of a voluntary Estonia therefore stands by the French proposal to abstention of the use of the veto with respect to establish a code of conduct on the voluntary restraint on situations involving atrocity crimes. Belgium hopes that the use of the veto and firmly believes that taking such a the permanent members of the Security Council will be step would help the Security Council to live up to its able to agree on a modus operandi in that respect, which mandate.” we believe would be an important contribution to the ongoing work on United Nations reform.” France Bosnia and Herzegovina “Mass crimes offend the global conscience and the memory of the sentiments that inspired the drafting of “My country, Bosnia and Herzegovina, supports the the Charter…But France also wishes to help prevent French initiative on a code of conduct for the use of the such tragedies. Without waiting for Charter reform, veto in the Security Council in situations of genocide, France proposed a restriction on the use of the veto in war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic the Security Council in case of mass atrocities, which cleansing. The proposal does not advance a limitation of would represent a major step. It is our duty to the Security Council; it is an attempt to overcome the demonstrate the extent to which a permanent seat in the current paralysis, to prevent future deadlocks, and to Council is a responsibility rather than a privilege or a reclaim the Council’s ability to make decisions that manifestation of some longing for status.” uphold its international responsibility for peace and security.” Georgia “Maintaining international peace and security is central to the Organization, especially the Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Code of Conduct As an Alternative to Reformation of the Un Security Council Bm Güvenlik Konseyi’Nin Reform Edilmesine Alternatif Olarak Davraniş Kodu
    Mehmet Halil Mustafa BEKTAŞ Alternatif Politika, 2017, 9 (2): 192-213 AP CODE OF CONDUCT AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO REFORMATION OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL BM GÜVENLİK KONSEYİ’NİN REFORM EDİLMESİNE ALTERNATİF OLARAK DAVRANIŞ KODU Mehmet Halil Mustafa BEKTAŞ* ABSTRACT The United Nations Security Council’s (SC) intermittent failure to perform its main duty of maintaining international peace and security has led to a longstanding debate about its reform. The ongoing Syrian crisis has resulted in a significant number of casualties, and has cost the international community heavily. The SC has thus become the subject both of severe criticism and of calls to take action. The inertia that results from an insistence on the use of the veto power has stimulated politicians to develop alternative methods. In this regard, some argue that there must be a Code of Conduct for the Council in order to enable it to react in cases of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. Proponents of a Code of Conduct for the SC have naturally directed their attention to the veto power, the main suggestion being that it must be restricted in these extreme circumstances. Three main initiatives have consequently been developed and have received a considerable degree of support from states. Yet their deficiencies, including a specific procedural trigger and a process by which an alternative course of action could be initiated should one or more of the permanent five Council members (P5) refuse to refrain from using their veto power, have largely been overlooked. The current proposal aims to * Araş. Gör. Dr., Uludağ Üniversitesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü, [email protected] * Makale Geliş Tarihi: 26.01.2017 Makale Kabul Tarihi: 11.04.2017 192 AP Mehmet Halil Mustafa BEKTAŞ examine these initiatives and make suggestions to remedy these shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Reform STUDENT OFFICER: Cate Goldwater-Breheney POSITION: Assistant Chair
    FORUM: Security Council ISSUE: Security Council Reform STUDENT OFFICER: Cate Goldwater-Breheney POSITION: Assistant Chair Introduction What is the UNSC and how does it work? The United Nations Security Council is an organ of the United Nations with “primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security”. Its powers include the establishment of international sanctions and peacekeeping operations, as well as the authorization of military action and investigation of conflicts. It is the only UN body that can issue binding resolutions to other member states – in other words, you have to do what it says. Furthermore, it deals with the admittance of new UN member states and Secretary-General (UN “leader”) candidacies. It is thus a very powerful body within the UN, and has been involved in serious international issues, including the Korean War, the Suez Canal Crisis and more recently the Rwandan Genocide. The UNSC has a complicated set-up. It has 15 members, five of whom are permanent members: France, the UK, the USA, China and Russia (essentially the victors from WW2). These permanent members have veto powers; should they vote against a resolution, it automatically does not pass. Resolutions otherwise require a 2/3 majority to pass, or 10 votes in favour. The 10 non-permanent members are elected for two year terms on a regional basis; the African Group holds 3 seats, the Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia-Pacific, and Western European and Others groups, 2 seats, and the Eastern European group, 1 seat. The presidency of the UNSC rotates monthly. UNSC non-permanent members in 2019 are: Germany, Belgium, South Africa, the Dominican Republic, Indonesia, the Ivory Coast, Equatorial Guinea, Kuwait, Peru, and Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essential Guidebook for SENIOR LEADERS of the UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT
    THE ESSENTIAL GUIDEBOOK FOR SENIOR LEADERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT United Nations Published by: The Office of Human Resources Department of Management United Nations January 2014 THE ESSENTIAL GUIDEBOOK FOR SENIOR LEADERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECRETARIAT United Nations TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward . 2 United Nations Acronyms . 3 1. THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER AND PRINCIPAL ORGANS. .8 United Nations Charter: Purposes and Principles . 10 Role of the International Civil Servant . 11 Principal Organs . .14 General Assembly . .14 Security Council . 21 Economic and Social Council . 24 International Court of Justice . .. 25 Trusteeship Council . 26 Secretariat . .. 26 Other relevant bodies . 26 Annex One: Subsidiary Organs of the General Assembly . 29 Annex Two: Subsidiary bodies of the Security Council . 33 Annex Three: Subsidiary bodies of the Economic and Social Council . 35 THE SECRETARY-GENERAL AND HIS EXECUTIVE OFFICE. 38 United Nations Secretary-General . 39 Executive Office of the Secretary-General: Integrated Leadership . 41 Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon: First- and Second- Term Priorities . 44 Executive Management Bodies: the Nuts and Bolts of the Executive Office of the Secretary-General . 46 Senior Management Group . 46 Policy Committee . 47 Management Committee . 49 Management Performance Board . 50 Senior Manager and Head of Mission Compacts . 51 Annex One: Organizational Chart of the EOSG . 53 Annex Two: Members of the Senior Management Group (SMG) . 54 Annex Three: Members of the Policy Committee . 55 Annex Four: Members of the Management Committee . .. 56 THE SECRETARIAT. .58 nature of the United Nations Secretariat . 59 Role and Purpose of Mandate . 63 Secretariat Structure and Purpose: Headquarters, Offices Away from Headquarters, Regional Commissions .
    [Show full text]
  • Failed Efforts to Reform Humanitarian Intervention System in the United Nations
    Şahin Eray Kırdım; Failed Efforts to Reform Humanitarian Intervention System in the United Nations FAILED EFFORTS TO REFORM HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION SYSTEM IN THE UNITED NATIONS1 DOI NO: 10.5578/jeas.50686 Şahin Eray KIRDIM2 ABSTRACT The doctrine of humanitarian intervention is one of the most controversial issues in international relations and law. The UN Security Council, acting under its Chapter VII powers, can authorize humanitarian interventions. However, a number of interventions after the Cold War have shown that the political considerations of the five permanent members reduce the effectiveness of humanitarian interventions undertaken by the international community. Scholars who wish to improve this effectiveness have had proposals ranging from trying to remove the veto power of the permanent members in humanitarian intervention discussions to those proposing another cosmopolitan organization that will have a permanent armed force ready to be used in humanitarian crises. This article examines whether or not those proposals are strong enough to give raise any amendment in the humanitarian intervention system. If not, it aims to extract the criteria for the appropriate authority in humanitarian interventions to help future proposals. Keyword: Humanitarian Intervention, United Nations, Security Council, Veto Power. Jel Classification: F5, K33, F53 75 BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLERDEKI İNSANİ MÜDAHALE SİSTEMİNİ REFORM ETMEYE YÖNELIK BAŞARISIZ DENEMELER ÖZ İnsani müdahale doktrini, uluslararası ilişkiler ve uluslararası hukukun en çok tartışılan konularından biridir. BM Güvenlik Konseyi, BM Şartı VII. Bölüm yetkileri dahilinde, uluslararası topluluğu insani müdahaleleri gerçekleştirme konusunda yetkilendirebilir. Ancak, Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde gerçekleştirilen pek çok insani müdahalenin gösterdiği gibi, beş daimi üyenin politik çıkar hesapları uluslararası toplum tarafından gerçekleştirilen insani müdahalelerin etkisini düşürmektedir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security Council's Endless Enlargement Debate
    ISSN 1802548X 9771802548012-97 THE SECURITY COUNCIL’S ENDLESS ENLARGEMENT DEBATE Shafa V. Gasimova Abstract: Recent talks on UN Security Council reform mainly fo- cused on enlargement issues based on the competing positions of the G4 (Germany, Japan, Brazil and India) and UfC (core members Italy, Paki- stan, Mexico and Egypt); groups which seem unable to reach a compro- mise in the near future. Even if they did manage to cooperate such will not produce efficiency in the UNSC’s work, since the main shortcoming of the Council is not a number of its members but the sacred veto power of its P5. Indeed, there are only five beneficiaries out of 194 UN members which are politically satisfied; the permanent members, which are relicts of World War II and since the Council continues to be formed by the P5, it is argued that the Council has lost its raison d’être. This work evalu- ates the international tensions derived from UNSC stagnation. Keywords: UN Security Council, Reform, Enlargement, Perma- nent Members, Veto Power INTRODUCTION After the double veto by Russia and China on the resolution about the situation in Syria at the UN Security Council (UNSC) on 4 February 20121 the reform of the Council once again proved its ne- cessity. The issue of reforms is on the global agenda for several years. The first feasible reforms of the Council happened in 1965 when its membership was enlarged from 11–15.2 But given to the fact that the number of the UN members increased from 117–193 since 19653 the necessity of the Council enlargement still remains relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • Expectations of Security Council Reform – Saving Us from ‘Hell’
    EXPECTATIONS OF SECURITY COUNCIL REFORM – SAVING US FROM ‘HELL’ Lieutenant-Colonel William Dymond JCSP 36 PCEMI 36 Master of Defence Studies Maîtrise en études de la défense Disclaimer Avertissement Opinions expressed remain those of the author and do Les opinons exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs et not represent Department of National Defence or ne reflètent aucunement des politiques du Ministère de Canadian Forces policy. This paper may not be used la Défense nationale ou des Forces canadiennes. Ce without written permission. papier ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation écrite. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the © Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, représentée par le Minister of National Defence, 2014 ministre de la Défense nationale, 2014 CANADIAN FORCES COLLEGE – COLLÈGE DES FORCES CANADIENNES JCSP 36 – PCEMI 36 MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES – MAÎTRISE EN ÉTUDES DE LA DÉFENSE EXPECTATIONS OF SECURITY COUNCIL REFORM – SAVING US FROM ‘HELL’ By Lieutenant-Colonel William Dymond “This paper was written by a student “La présente étude a été rédigée par attending the Canadian Forces College un stagiaire du Collège des Forces in fulfilment of one of the requirements canadiennes pour satisfaire à l'une des of the Course of Studies. The paper is exigences du cours. L'étude est un a scholastic document, and thus document qui se rapporte au cours et contains facts and opinions, which the contient donc des faits et des opinions author alone considered appropriate que seul l'auteur considère appropriés and correct for the subject. It does not et convenables au sujet.
    [Show full text]
  • A/63/PV.54 General Assembly
    United Nations A/63/PV.54 General Assembly Official Records Sixty-third session 54th plenary meeting Tuesday, 18 November 2008, 3 p.m. New York President: Mr. D’Escoto Brockmann............................ (Nicaragua) In the absence of the President, Mr. Salgueiro It also includes the number of meetings held, whether (Portugal), Vice-President, took the Chair. formal open meetings or consultations, as well as the number of resolutions adopted by the Council. The meeting was called to order at 3.10 p.m. However, as in earlier years, the report does not analyse the Council’s work and the issues on which it Agenda items 9 and 111 (continued) has not been able to make progress, such as the Report of the Security Council (A/63/2) Palestinian question. We need to understand the reasons for that failure if we are to find solutions and Question of equitable representation on and understand why the Council did not perform as it increase in the membership of the Security should have. Undoubtedly, that would be useful for Council and related matters everyone concerned. We need to study those reasons Mr. Almansoor (Bahrain) (spoke in Arabic): and work together to assist the Council in finding First of all, I would like to congratulate you, Sir, on the solutions to those matters and other issues on its way in which you have been steering the work of the agenda. General Assembly and the general debate of the Discussion of the two items also serves to Assembly. We also wish to thank Ambassador Jorge strengthen the relationship between the General Urbina, Permanent Representative of Costa Rica and Assembly and the Security Council, so that together President of the Security Council for the month of those two organs can promote and strengthen the November, for his comprehensive presentation of the values and principles of the United Nations in the best annual report of the Security Council, which appears in possible way.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Library European Parliament
    Library Briefing Library of the European Parliament 22/05/2013 Reform of the UN Security Council SUMMARY The divergent responses of the In this briefing: United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to the Context crises in Syria and Libya – a veto on action in the former case contrasted with authorisation The current UNSC and its challenges for action in the latter – have once again Institutionalising reform efforts provided a reminder of the power of the UNSC's veto-wielding permanent members to Reform proposals currently discussed determine when the UN's collective security An EU seat in the UNSC? system may come into action. Stakeholders' views The UNSC's composition and working methods were established in 1945, and the size Further reading of its non-permanent membership has been modified only once, in 1963. While all UN The UNSC's mandate under the UN Charter members appear to agree that the UNSC needs Function: The UNSC's primary responsibility is to reflect today's geopolitical realities, there is the maintenance of international peace and fundamental disagreement among them over security (Art. 24). how to accomplish this objective. A wide range Powers: In order to exercise its mandate, the of proposals have been made over time. But UNSC may respond to disputes endangering for more than two decades the entrenched peace by facilitating their pacific settlement (Art. positions of three main groups – the Group of 33-38). In case of threats to peace, breaches of Four (G4), the Uniting for Consensus (UfC) and the peace and acts of aggression, it may resort the African Union (AU) groups – have to enforcement action under Chapter VII (Art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia
    The Responsibility to Protect in Southeast Asia 30 January 2009 The Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect The Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect is an Associate of the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. The Centre’s mission is to advance the Responsibility to Protect principle within the Asia-Pacific Re- gion and worldwide, and support the building of capacity to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. Staff: Alex Bellamy (Executive Director), Muhadi Sugiono, Sara Davies, Sarah Teitt, Charles Hunt, Jess Gifkins, Stephen McLoughlin, Kimberly Nackers, Luke Glanville Report Design: Naomi Smith Contact: Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect c/o School of Political Science & International Studies The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia Tel: +61 7 3365 3301 Email: [email protected] Web: www.r2pasiapacific.org Previous Publications: Associated Journal: December 2008: 'China and the June 2008: The Responsibility The Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect' Report to Protect and the Protection of Civilians: Asia-Pacific in the UN Responsibility to Protect launched October 2008: 'Japan and Security Council' Report and manages the world's first the Republic of Korea on the quarterly journal dedicated to Responsibility to Protect' Report May 2008: 'Cyclone Nargis and the publishing the best research on the Responsibility to Protect' Report Responsibility to Protect: Global October 2008: Joint
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Sixty-Second Session
    United Nations A/62/PV.50 General Assembly Official Records Sixty-second session 50th plenary meeting Tuesday, 13 November 2007, 9 a.m. New York President: Mr. Kerim ............................... (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) The meeting was called to order at 3.15 p.m. architecture of the African Union into the system of collective security established by the Charter. Agenda items 9 and 122 (continued) Implementation of the Ten-Year Capacity- Report of the Security Council (A/62/2) Building Programme to strengthen the capacities of the African Union will help the efforts to bring long-term Question of equitable representation on and increase stability to the continent. We urge the Security Council in the membership of the Security Council and to continue to promote the Programme and to improve related matters coordination of its activities in Africa with the African Mr. Ehouzou (Benin) (spoke in French): On Union Peace and Security Council. We hope that the behalf of my delegation, Mr. President, I thank you for forthcoming report of the Secretary-General on convening this meeting to consider the report of the relations between the United Nations and the African Security Council (A/62/2). I am grateful to the Union will contain concrete recommendations on President of the Council for presenting it. I also thank improving the structure of cooperation. the Secretary-General for his notification pursuant to We welcome the Security Council’s efforts to paragraph 2 of Article 12 of the Charter (A/62/300). strengthen its actions to prevent the outbreak of new My delegation associates itself with the statement crises threatening international peace and security.
    [Show full text]
  • ABC Switzerland UN Contents
    ABC Switzerland UN Contents Introduction 3 Glossary 10 Organisation chart of the UN 28-29 2 ABC Switzerland – UN Introduction We count on worldwide harmonised security systems when travelling by air, and we take it for granted that the Internet functions around the world. When major disasters hit, we assume that international aid is coordinated. And when a pandemic breaks out, we count on someone somewhere to monitor its course. This confidence is founded on global cooperation, the need for which was clear long before a comprehensive world organisation came into existence. For instance, the Universal Postal Union, founded in 1874 and with its seat in Bern, arose from the economic need to send and receive letters everywhere in the world. Nowadays, almost all areas of global cooperation are integrated in the United Nations (UN) and the UN system or have a political presence there. The UN was founded in 1945, in the final stages of the Second World War, with the objective of ensuring peace and security through- out the world in the future. Its headquarters are in New York, where its most important organs, the General Assembly and the Security Council, convene. The UN’s second office is in Geneva, in the previous head- quarters of the ill-fated League of Nations that was founded after the First World War. A large number of UN specialised agencies are based in Geneva – some of which have existed far longer than the UN itself. The UN’s other offices are based in Vienna and Nairobi. A voluntary association At the UN, nations are united, not unified.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Intergovernmental Negotiations on Security Council Reform
    WFUNA International Model United Nations ​ General Assembly Distr.: Limited Jan 7, 2020 Original: English Sixth Session Agenda Item 10 Report of the Intergovernmental Negotiations On Security Council Reform 1 WFUNA International Model United Nations Note This report briefly outlines the: 1) history, 2) evolution of discussions, and 3) key documents on the work of the Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) on the Question of Equitable Representation on and Increase in the Membership of the Security Council and Other Matters related to the Security Council. 2 WFUNA International Model United Nations Contents Chapter I. Brief History and Background 4 II. Common Positions of Key Groups 7 III. Evolution of IGN Discussion Since 2008 8 IV. Key Documents 11 A. Decision 62/557 11 B. Elements of convergence on two of the five key issues of Security Council reform 11 C. Revised Elements Of Commonality And Issues For Further Consideration 12 Further Reading 13 3 WFUNA International Model United Nations I. Brief History and Background 1. When the United Nations was created in 1945, the UN Charter stated that the Security Council should be composed of five permanent members and six elected members. 2. By 1963, the number of Member States had increased from 51 to 113. and the General Assembly adopted resolution 1991 A (XVIII) which added four non-permanent members to the Council. 3. In 1979, “the question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council” was added to the General Assembly agenda at the request of Algeria, Argentina, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Guyana, India, the Maldives, Nepal, Nigeria and Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]