DOCSLIB.ORG

'~"Lfiilliml Conference I , '"I Warehouse O,.., ROOM 1 ROOM 3 ROOM 5 Parcell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'~ 65'-6"----->j I #2210 I I r ROOM 2 REST RC OM ,'~"lfIilliml Conference I , '"I Warehouse o,.., ROOM 1 ROOM 3 ROOM 5 Parcell Upper Level ~~~- ROOM 1 ROO~ 2 ROOM 6 ROOM1~~'. RMl .. RAlStO f'LOOR ROOM 4 ROOM 5 b ",'. ~ ... i '":'i ...q\l, 1 r'- ROOM 1 r 'u:: ~ Lower Level '\ '\ ~ IR~turn to site m~~ ] ,::;;, IReturn to photos I {:II " I #2229 I Flammable Storage Parcell Fu:el Pumps 750 SF Constructed: 1990 Southfacing -~ 0­ Westfacing '"ir. /'l., "7 \"'''.,1 {, ~ IReturn to site map I =@ IFloor Plan I 0: ~~ I #222? I ~ 36' 0" ~ 12'-0" I' 12'-0" "I- 12'-0" ------- Parcell 1 "0 I o 0) Flammable Storage 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fuel I I I I Pumps I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I ~ I ~ (W W) ,, =:3 [i~t~~~~ite ma~J ==::II I Return to photos I ~ FCR ASSESSME\JT NW1!4 SEC. 28 T.16S. R.4E. W.t.4. A~D TAXATIO\i 16 45 2& 2 lANE COUNlY O~ seAL[ 1" .. toCt BLUE RIVER 8_"442:t .r_"*"MF~~D4F .HAD 83/91 W!.!:_~ -~f """".... .. ....m., ::: .;.. :::.'" ~ ,~ ~; Iil:i ......... , ,~ ,n it it ~ 1 ~ iii .... , : ~. -+­ ,I I i' , ~ I :' , ~~>~E~ :~:~.; :~:'fi ,: ~ ,. ;() II ..'" I• .... /' """ ..... i!" I I I c-' I I d:I I ta I -tYt / _1~, J- .... -­ ~~f 1545282 tv 'E'lWHI4SU /} BlUE RIVER ,} .,; . .~ ~II '" "It ....~..,,; 0 ..J- ;';\. ~.r..,';~ f,..../ -/.. 0 0­ 0 .. :e .;o~* ./'- ~'\D '" {!. f v. / '10 ~ ... € • .~~ .....:-uC't~ .. 0..,,,, • ft. , "" J,,'\ • • ;; f-- -- 8 \ I I ~----I---~- _______-\ ____J • I ---­ --------- \\ I I ~\ I I \i j' I ~~-"'~,J; ~ I I .'It I II P ~'" i ~ ': ~ <" '.~ i :~ I,,, is •• ________+- ___________ -+-"..~__1._ ~~ ! • ,i §. ~ . • .'­ I i i ,I o • =§ I Ii !!I 2 I I ,r------l~-----f~----~--~--iI I I I I I I n I I - v' .1, § i : • I • • ; 00-<'<") = I • lD~ .... ... • EXHIBIT 8 PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE MAP 16-45-28-20 Tax Lots 300 & 400 Map 16-45-29 Tax Lots 1700 & 1800 , .­ IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON ) IN THE MATTER OF APPLYING THE RURAL ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND ) RURAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONES TO ORDINANCE NO. PA 884 ) RURAL LANE COUNTY OUTSIDE THE ) METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN ) BOUNDARY, AND OU'.l'SIDE ALL URBAN ) GROWTH BOUNDARIES, REPEALING PRIOR ) ZONING DISTRICTS AND PLAN DESIGNA­ ) TIONS, AND ADOPTING A SAVINGS AND ) SEVERABILITY CLAUSE WHEREAS, the plan deSignations and zoning districts app1:lcable to rural Lane County are not in fuLL COMPliance with the Statewide'00'18, aDd . ,'';' " -..... WHEREAS, the Orevon State Land Conservation and Development COllllllis.lon has granted Lane County an extension of. time to revis. its clesignatiens and zones to bring them into confomity with the Statewide Planning Ooals', end WHEREAS, the Board of County COllllllissioners has received from the Lane County Planning Commission and the West Lane County Planning COlllllliasion recollllllended application of the new plan designations and zonea, and ' '­ WHEREAS, the Board of County COllllllissioners bas conducted a public hearing and ia now ready to take action. now, therefore, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: . , 1. The Plan Designation and Zones as sat forth on the attached map. (Exhibit "An,) are hereby applied to Rural Lane County outside the Metropolitan Area General Plan Boundary and outside all Urban Growth Bounderies as modified by the attached challljJe request summary, Board of County Commissioners action column (Appendix nS") • 2. Wi th exception of tbe following I (a) Rural Transportation Plan (Adopted by Ordinance No. '-80). (b) Willamette Greenway Plan (Adopted by Ordinance No. 783). (c) Parks and Open Space Plan (Ad~ted by Ordinance No. SSO). (d) Solid Waste Management Plan (Adopted by Ordinance No. 771 and subsequent amendment). (e) Coastal Resourcea Manaqement Plan (Adopted by Ordinance No. 803) (Amended by Ordinance Noe. S62 and 876) . .­ 1 - ORDINANCE NO. PA 884 (f) Siualaw River Dredqeel: Material Disposal Plan (Adopted b1 Ordinance No. 749) (Amended by Ordinance Nos. S6l and 877). (q) Housinq Plan (Adopted by Ordinance 1-78). c::orciinq Secretary Meeting of the Board -.1 , 2 - ORDINANCE NO. PA 8S4 Ic47 ORDINANCE NO. PA B84 • LEGISLATIVE FI!'IDINGS .... Ordinance No. PA 8S4 is the implementation of the policies adopted in Ordinance No. PA S83. The support documents and Findings adopted in that Ordinance are, therefore, adopted as if fully set forth herein. Major map changes, based upon a nonresource designation are supported by prior ~asi-judicilll or current Findings set forth on attached Exhibit liD • The Diagrllllls and Zones reflect only one "need" exception arising from a prior quasi-judicial application. We, therefore, readopt the need exception set forth on attached Exhibit "E".· Note that pursuant to CPR sUl\lDlary, the new designation 1s Destination Resort, rather than Coft'llercial Zones. However, the exception to the Goal remains valid. The site review conditions are also readopted. ..., .. In addition, map chang-es occurring on the basis of a Marqinal Landa designaUon are explained in the attached Exhibit "F". • All other changes' to the maps from the original staff recommendation are supported by chanqes to the developed and committed exception and the information and Findings submitted with CPR requests. Because the lUIIount of supporting information ill 'l(ery extensive, it ill not possible to set out new Findings for each approval, nor is such analysis appropriate for a legislative Ordinance. However. the basis for the approval exists in the written attachmente to the CPR's, public testimony and deliberation. This information is available on request. EXHIBIT "e" .:. LEGEND PLAN DESIGNATIONS \ \0:- ILIlOEND ZONES o Agrlcultuf.' La"," @ Al,port O..,e'8uon o F.r••t Land COMMERCIAL lONI!S ® R....alLIImI @ Lhilued committe'.' (COMMUNITY) COIIIII....'lIy (§) NeiehbofftOOd CommercIal ® PubUe facility @> COlm1'l"'o~8f e Pa," & Rec,.aU_ 0 Rv,.' Commerqial @ COI'ftfII.rciat AORICUL TURAL ZONES o 1ft_trial ( £25) taclv."',. "arm U•• ~5 ~ AI,,,o'l ( E30) lach"'ve 'ettn U•• :lO <3 Mat_a' R•• ourc, f MI".r.' G.ID Eac....l•• F.m Uee 40 ( NRC":') Natural R._arc, :CoMentIUOI'I Ate. ( £60) £u:t...... Farm UH 110 Ar•• Subject To Coa••al ReIOUfC•• MatUIJg,,..ont Plan FOREST ZONES @ Nc:rintDact.d for.st Land', Roaaay RaUroad @ Impacted t=or••• Landd City LlmII5 ..........._- ".'ro ptOft Bouncfary INDUS TRIAL lOBI!S • Urb.. Growth soundary LiGht I""nt'lal " Count, Un. 8 .. u~, ••• ... Wnlamette Ifl."r OrHnwa, €I Heavy ',"",strlal RESOURCE ZONES 9 Hat""a' R•• OVfC. @ ..../Jllc helRIy e PI'" /I R""",.tlon @ Qua..y /I Ittlnlng @ Seftd.• Gr.,•• ICP I Controlled PfCC...ift8 RESIDENTIAL %DHlS S 1II__R..ldentl.1 @ Qard.n Ap.rtment @ Rural R.. ld.......1 @ Rural Residential @ Rur.' ResiGe"ttal C (RRlO) Aur•• H••tetenllal ISR I Site R....W I '-I.~ f1 fD~---,.___ .....--~.~ ... '01 I I f ,.- .' 1 k'" i ".'. f' 1 I(,r .­ 1 y\ , ,. ., ~\ ".~. .. •oo . !: 0: 1;, 0' EXHIBIT 9 PLAN AMENDMENT & ZONE CHANGE MAP 16-45-28-20 Tax Lots 300 & 400 Map 16-45-29 Tax Lots 1700 & 1800 J SI EXHIBIT "K n DEVELOPED AND COMMITTED LANDS EXCEPTIONS (SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS) Map: 16-45-21,16-45-28 plot: 621 Name: Blue River Rural Community Exception Number: 1 11. PARCEL CREATION HISTORY a) 84 parcels were created before adoption of the goals, determined as follows: i. Using the boundaries and dates of partitions which have been plotted from the Lane County Assessment and Taxation maps onto the computer drawn map of the exception area, the total number of parcels in this category created prior to December 27, 1974 is: O. ii. Using the boundaries and dates of subdivisions which have been plotted from the Lane County Assessment and Taxation maps and survey records onto the computer drawn map of the exception area, the total number of parcels in this category created prior to December 27, 1974 is: 72. iii. Using the Lane County computer drawn map and year-built data for residences which have been plotted onto the computer drawn map of the exception area, the total number of parcels not included in above categories i. and ii. and having a residence built prior to December 27, 1974 is: 6. iv. Using the Lane County Assessment and Taxation maps and year-built data for residences which have been plotted onto the computer drawn map of the exception area, the total number of parcels not included in above categories i., ii. and iii. either vacant or having a residence built after December 27, 1974 is: O. It is assumed that parcels in categories iii. and iv. were created prior to December 27, 1974 for two reasons. The first reason is that the parcel had a residence on it prior to 12/27/74 which indicates that the parcel existed in some form prior to 12/27/74. The second reason requires a more detailed explanation. On March 26, 1975. Lane County adopted land division regulations which required County approval of all partitions and recording of partition maps for all approved partitions. The 3/26/75 land division ordinance adoption date corresponds closely to the 12/27/74 Goal adoption date. It is generally accurate to assume that, if parcels were created after 12/27/74, they would be included in an approved and recorded partition map; and, that parcels without an approved and recorded partition map were created before 12/27/74. v. Using the Lane county computer drawn map with the year built data and the partition and subdivision data plotted on it, the total number of parcels not included in an approved and recorded partition or subdivision, and being vacant or having a residence without built-upon data prior to 12/27/74 is: 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the Upper Blue River Drainage of the Mckenzie River Ranger District, Willamette National Forest
    FY2009 ISSSP Surveys for Salamander Slug [aka Axetail Slug] (Gliabates oregonius) in the Upper Blue River drainage of the McKenzie River Ranger District, Willamette National Forest. Authored by Joe Doerr and Tiffany Young, Wildlife Biologists, Willamette National Forest, 10/20/2009. In 2008, the salamander slug (Gliabates oregonius), also known as the axetail slug, was added to the sensitive species list for the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service in the Pacific Northwest. This species was first described as Gliabates oregonia from specimens collected in north-central Lane County (Webb 1959). The scientific name was subsequently changed to Gliabates oregonius by other researchers (Tom Burke personal communication). Gliabates oregonius is classified a S1 species endemic to Oregon and confirmed from a handful of locations in the Cascade and Coast Ranges within the Willamette River drainage. The mollusk is reported associated with conifer and leaf litter in Douglas-fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii) and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) forest habitat. Due to its apparent low abundance and association with forest habitat, there is considerable potential for negative impacts from silvicultural activities, such as logging, fuel treatments and prescribed burning. There is a management need to better understand the abundance and distribution of this species. Following its inclusion on the sensitive species list, biologists on the McKenzie River Ranger District reviewed previous mollusk surveys conducted under the “Survey and Manage Program”. In their review they found a high number of reported detections of axetail slugs in the upper portion of the Blue River drainage. The reports showed detections of 139 individuals at 86 locations during surveys in the fall of 1998 and the spring of 1999 connected with a timber sale planned in that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckenzie River Sub-Basin Action Plan 2016-2026
    McKenzie River Sub-basin Strategic Action Plan for Aquatic and Riparian Conservation and Restoration, 2016-2026 MCKENZIE WATERSHED COUNCIL AND PARTNERS June 2016 Photos by Freshwaters Illustrated MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The McKenzie Watershed Council thanks the many individuals and organizations who helped prepare this action plan. Partner organizations that contributed include U.S. Forest Service, Eugene Water & Electric Board, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, McKenzie River Trust, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District, Lane Council of Governments and Weyerhaeuser Company. Plan Development Team Johan Hogervorst, Willamette National Forest, U.S. Forest Service Kate Meyer, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Karl Morgenstern, Eugene Water & Electric Board Larry Six, McKenzie Watershed Council Nancy Toth, Eugene Water & Electric Board Jared Weybright, McKenzie Watershed Council Technical Advisory Group Brett Blundon, Bureau of Land Management – Eugene District Dave Downing, Upper Willamette Soil & Water Conservation District Bonnie Hammons, McKenzie River Ranger District, U.S. Forest Service Chad Helms, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jodi Lemmer, McKenzie River Trust Joe Moll, McKenzie River Trust Maryanne Reiter, Weyerhaeuser Company Kelly Reis, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife David Richey, Lane Council of Governments Kirk Shimeall, Cascade Pacific Resource Conservation and Development Andy Talabere, Eugene Water & Electric Board Greg Taylor, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jeff Ziller, Springfield Office, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife MCKENZIE RIVER SUB-BASIN STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN June 2016 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Cougar Reservoir Drawdown on Sediment and DDT Transport and Deposition in the Mckenzie River Basin, Oregon, Water Years 2002–04
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Influence of Cougar Reservoir Drawdown on Sediment and DDT Transport and Deposition in the McKenzie River Basin, Oregon, Water Years 2002–04 Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front Cover: Cougar Reservoir near Terwilliger Hot Springs, Oregon. (Photograph taken by Chauncey Anderson, U.S. Geological Survey.) Back Cover: Cougar Reservoir withdrawal tower upon completion of construction in 2005. (Photograph from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Influence of Cougar Reservoir Drawdown on Sediment and DDT Transport and Deposition in the McKenzie River Basin, Oregon, Water Years 2002–04 By Chauncey W. Anderson Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5164 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Screening Exemption Proposal
    BakerCounty MasonDamHydroelectricProject _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FishScreeningExemptionProposal October2013 Introduction: Baker County is seeking an exemption from screening for the existing Mason Dam in the following proposal. On April 30, 2013 Baker County filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a new hydroelectric license at the existing Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Mason Dam. Because of the addition of the hydroelectric project this triggers Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 498.301 through 351 screening criteria. The following proposal provides background describing the project, a summary of the project impacts from the Entrainment and Mortality report, Baker County’s proposed mitigation and an explanation of how those measures will provide resource protection. Background: Existing Project Mason Dam is located in Baker County, Oregon approximately 11 miles southwest of Baker City on State Highway 7(Figure1). Mason Dam was built by the BOR on the Powder River for irrigation, water delivery and flood control. Mason Dam was constructed from 1965 – 1968 and has a total height of 173 feet and a maximum hydraulic height of 157 feet. Phillips Reservoir is a 2,234 acre-reservoir that was formed by the construction of Mason Dam. The reservoir has a total storage capacity of 95,500 acre-feet and an active storage capacity of 90,500 acre-feet. Existing Operation Water is generally stored between October through March with some releases above the minimum flow starting to occur in late March through April. Irrigation season starts in May and runs through September. Releases average approximately 10 cubic feet per second (cfs) between October and January, increase to an average of 20 to 50 cfs during February and March, gradually increasing to 100 cfs during April to early-May.
    [Show full text]
  • Mckenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents
    McKenzie River, ca. 1944 McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Report February 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 McKenzie River, ca. 2000 Prepared for the McKenzie Watershed Council Prepared By: Alsea Geospatial, Inc. Hardin-Davis, Inc. Pacific Wildlife Research, Inc. WaterWork Consulting McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment Summary Table of Contents High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring 1 The McKenzie River Watershed: Introduction 8 I. Watershed Overview 9 II. Aquatic Ecosystem Issues & Findings 17 Recommendations 29 III. Fish Populations Issues & Findings 31 Recommendations 37 IV. Wildlife Species and Habitats of Concern Issues & Findings 38 Recommendations 47 V. Putting the Assessment to work 50 Juvenile Chinook Habitat Modeling 51 Juvenile Chinook Salmon Habitat Results 54 VI. References 59 VII. Glossary of Terms 61 The McKenzie River Subbasin Assessment was funded by grants from the Bonneville Power Administration and the U.S. Forest Service. High Priority Action Items for Conservation, Restoration, and Monitoring Our analysis indicates that aquatic and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River subbasin is relatively good yet habitat quality falls short of historical conditions. High quality habitat currently exists at many locations along the McKenzie River. This assessment concluded, however, that the river’s current condition, combined with existing management and regulations, does not ensure conservation or restoration of high quality habitat in the long term. Significant short-term improvements in aquatic and wildlife habitat are not likely to happen through regulatory action. Current regulations rarely address remedies for past actions. Furthermore, regulations and the necessary enforcement can fall short of attaining conservation goals. Regulations are most effective in ensuring that habitat quality trends improve over the long period.
    [Show full text]
  • Removal Action Report US Forest Service, Blue River Administration Site Blue River, Oregon
    Removal Action Report US Forest Service, Blue River Administration Site Blue River, Oregon Prepared for: US Forest Service, Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District Report Date: August 2012 PBS Project No. 76127.000, Phase 0004 Removal Action Report US Forest Service, Blue River Administration Site Blue River, Oregon TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE LOCATION AND SETTING ..................................................................................... 1 2.1 Location ............................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Physiographic Setting......................................................................................... 1 3.0 PREVIOUS SITE STUDIES .............................................................................................. 2 3.1 Assessment and Evaluation of Remedial Options ........................................... 2 3.2 Waste Determination ........................................................................................... 2 4.0 REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH ................................................... 2 5.0 SAFETY ............................................................................................................................ 3 6.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES.................................................................................. 4 6.1 Monitoring Well Abandonment
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 State(S): Oregon Recovery Unit Name: Willamette River
    Chapter 5 State(s): Oregon Recovery Unit Name: Willamette River Recovery Unit Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed necessary to recover and protect listed species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, in this case, with the assistance of recovery unit teams, contractors, State and Tribal agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or indicate the approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature Cited: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Chapter 5, Willamette River Recovery Unit, Oregon. 96 p. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Draft Recovery Plan. Portland, Oregon. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Two working groups are active in the Willamette River Recovery Unit: the Upper Willamette (since 1989) and Clackamas Bull Trout Working Groups. In 1999, these groups were combined, and, along with representation from the Santiam subbasin, comprise the Willamette River Recovery Unit Team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quartz Enhancement Project Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) Is Now Available for Comment
    The Quartz Enhancement Project Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) is now available for comment. The McKenzie River Ranger District is proposing to actively manage stands on approximately 1,337 acres on the Willamette National Forest. This will be done to provide a sustainable supply of timber products, improve stand conditions as they relate to density, diversity, and structure, increase vegetative habitat complexity along streams and sustainably manage the network of road systems used for this activity. To accomplish this project, the district proposes to harvest about 21 million board feet (MMBF) from 35 managed stands ranging in age from 28 to 77 years old. In these stands, proposed treatments include about 844 acres of commercial thinning while 270 acres would be retained as skips. In addition, 145 acres would be harvested as openings (gaps) and 79 acres of dominant tree releases (DTRs) ranging from 1/4 to 3 acres in size. Although the treatments identified in this project are tracked separately (commercial thinning, gaps, DTR, skips), they will all use variable density thinning treatments to increase variability within any given stand. Accessing harvest units would require about 3.1 miles of temporary road construction, which would utilize previously impacted areas when possible. There would also be approximately 31.8 miles of road maintenance, and approximately 5.3 miles of road decommissioning. The total Quartz project area encompasses 14,508 acres and is located off of Forest Service Road 2618 approximately 10 miles south of the community of Blue River, Oregon. The Quartz Creek 6th Field boundary consists of approximately 27,090 acres within the McKenzie River Ranger District (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Angling Guide Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife
    Angling Guide Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Alton Baker Park canoe canal: In Eugene by Autzen Stadium. Stocked in the spring with rainbow trout. A good place to take kids. Big Cliff Reservoir: 150 acres on the North Santiam River. The dam is located several miles below Detroit Dam off of Highway 22. Stocked with trout. Blue River Reservoir and Upper Blue River: 42 miles east of Eugene off Highway 126. Native cutthroat and rainbow. Stocked in spring and early summer with rainbow trout. USFS campground. Bond Butte Pond: 3 miles north of the Harrisburg exit on the east side of I-5 at MP 212 (the Bond Butte overpass). Channel catfish, largemouth bass, white crappie, bluegill. Carmen Reservoir: 65-acre reservoir located on Highway 126 appproximately 70 miles east of Springfield. Rainbow trout, cutthroat trout, brook trout. Clear Lake: 70 miles east of Eugene off Highway 126. Naturally reproducing brook trout and stocked with rainbow trout. Resort with restaurant, boat and cabin rentals. USFS campground. Cottage Grove Ponds: A group of 6 ponds totaling 15 acres. Located 1.5 miles east of Cottage Grove on Row River Road behind the truck scales. Largemouth bass, bluegill, bullhead. Rainbow trout are stocked into one pond in the spring. Cottage Grove Reservoir: Six miles south of Cottage Grove on London Road. Largemouth bass, brown bullhead, bluegill, cutthroat trout. Hatchery rainbow are stocked in the spring. USACE provides campgrounds. There is a health advisory for mercury contamination. Pregnant women, nursing women and children up to six years old should not eat fish other than stocked rainbow trout; children older than 6 and healthy adults should not eat more than 1/2 pound per week.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2006
    United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring and Forest Service Evaluation Report Pacific Northwest Willamette National Forest Region Fiscal Year 2006 Gold Lake on the Middle Fork Ranger District, Willamette National Forest ii May, 2007 I am pleased to present the Willamette National Forest’s 16th Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Report for your review. The climate in which we began implementing the Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP), in 1991, has changed considerably. The largest change occurred in 1994 when the Northwest Forest Plan amended our LRMP by establishing new land allocations. The Forest Plan is a dynamic document, designed to adapt to changing circumstances. I am proud to say that the Forest has kept its promise to change as the world changes in order to keep our plan fresh and responsive. The Willamette is currently scheduled to begin Forest Plan revision in 2011. Until we begin Plan revision, it is my commitment to keep you informed of the results of monitoring through this report; however if you would like more information, feel free to contact the Forest or visit our website at www.fs.fed.us/r6/willamette. Your continued interest in the Forest Plan is just one way for you to stay current with activities on your public lands. Sincerely, DALLAS J. EMCH Forest Supervisor Willamette National Forest r6-will-008-07 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program.
    [Show full text]
  • 65 Places to Go Fishing in Lane County
    56. Konnie Memorial Park near the town of Swisshome. If you have more time and a boat…These Common Fish Siuslaw area trips are appropriate for drift boats, pontoons or kayaks. Standing waters Boaters are always responsible for knowing their craft, the nature of the river and their own abilities. Scout 57. Triangle Lake, Blachly 65 places before you go! Bass, bluegill, yellow perch, bullhead, kokanee, trout This large, popular, natural lake offers varied fishing that can be 1. Middle Fork Willamette River: Pengra to Jasper or red-hot, especially on the south and east shores. Access by boat Clearwater. A few technical spots keep boaters alert on to go fishing or from a fishing pier. this classic fish-and-float for trout and the occasional Rainbow trout Brook trout Cutthroat salmon or steelhead. A close-in trip that feels like a in Lane County Coastal Fishing remote getaway. Lane County offers so much to explore -- from coastal lakes and rivers to mountain lakes and 58. Alder Lake, Florence 2. McKenzie River: Hayden Bridge to Armitage Park. streams. The Willamette River runs through the Eugene-Springfield metro area and is fed by three major rivers: the Trout A gentle float with a few technical spots and abundant McKenzie, Middle Fork Willamette and Coast Fork Willamette. Florence is surrounded by large dune lakes, the Siuslaw A 3-acre dune lake with access to trails. Adjacent to a trout make this stretch relaxing and enjoyable. Catch- River and Pacific Ocean. With so many places to fish, it’s no wonder Lane County is an anglers’ paradise.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Vegetation and Soils of Terraces and Floodplains Along the Mckenzie River, Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF GLENN MARTIN HAWK for the MASTER OF SCIENCE (Name) (Degree) in BOTANY (PLANT ECOLOGY) presented onpi 1.71977___ (Major) J (Date) Title: FOREST VEGETATION AND SOILS OF TERRACES AND FLOODPLAINS ALONG THE MCKENZIE RIVER, OREGON Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy DonaB. Zobl A study of the McKenzie River floodplains, terraces and glacial outwash plains was undertaken to classify and describe the vegetation and soils of a previously little studied synecological unit. During the summer of 1971, 54 analytic vegetation and soil plots (stands) were studied.Cover and frequency of all trees, shrubs, herbs and mosses were recorded as well as a soil description for each stand.Using Braun-Blanquet manual-visual association tables and computerized SIMORD analysis, four communities wereidentified. Further analysis of the four communities revealed two sequencesof seral associes leading to the development of two basichabitat types: one a climatic climax and theother a topo-edaphic climax association. Succession on floodplains, terraces, and glacialoutwash plains appears initially to follow achange from coarse, shallow soils to fine, deep soils.The climatic climax (Tsuga heterophylla/Acercircinatum/ Polystichum munitum- Oxalis oregana association) thendevelops on floodplains and terraces with deep, fine textured soils.The topo- edaphic climax (Tsuga heterophylla/Berberis nervosa-Gaultheria shallon/Linnaea borealis association develops on terraces and glacial outwash plains with shallow, coarse textured soils that have large amounts of stones and cobbles in all horizons of the soil profile. Further modifications of sites by fire and flooding also create different plant communities which add to the total diversity of forest vegetation occurring on alluvial deposits of the McKenzie River, Oregon.
    [Show full text]