DOCSLIB.ORG

Chugach National Forest Planning Area and the Three Different Geographic Areas of the National Forest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Introduction Chapter 1 described the Chugach National Forest planning area and the three different geographic areas of the national forest. This chapter describes the overall ecological integrity of the area. Ecological integrity for this assessment is defined as: “The quality or condition of an ecosystem when its dominant ecological characteristics (for example, composition, structure, function, connectivity, and species composition and diversity) occur within the natural range of variation and can withstand and recover from most perturbations imposed by natural environmental dynamics or human influence.” (36 CFR 219.19) The ecosystems described in this chapter include terrestrial (soils, vegetation, and wildlife), aquatic (freshwater and coastal marine ecology) and the interface between the two (riparian areas and wetlands).These ecosystems are evaluated at the forestwide and geographic area scales where appropriate. Key characteristics of each ecosystem are identified, including species composition and diversity, structure, function, and connectivity. Existing conditions and trends of the key characteristics are described for each ecosystem. System drivers are also discussed and include dominant ecological processes, disturbance regimes, and stressors for the different ecosystems. This chapter also includes a discussion of federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species that occur within the Chugach National Forest and a discussion of potential species of conservation concern. It concludes with a discussion and summary findings of the ability of the aquatic, terrestrial, and riparian ecosystems in the plan area to adapt to a rapidly changing climate. Physical properties of the environment both constrain and enable the development of some ecological systems within the Chugach National Forest. A brief overview of the physical properties of the Chugach National Forest environment follows. Those that most directly influence ecosystems are emphasized. The Chugach National Forest includes the northernmost coastal temperate rain forests in North America and areas transitional to boreal forests. It is almost entirely within the Kenai-Chugach mountain system. The Kenai-Chugach mountain system is a topographically continuous mountain chain that extends from Kodiak Island through the Kenai Peninsula and around Prince William Sound, eventually connecting to the Saint Elias Range to the east. The principle fault systems in the area follow the same curved trend as the Kenai-Chugach mountain system. The Border Ranges fault lies in the lowlands along the mountain front and nearly parallels the western border of the Chugach National Forest (Karl, Vaughn, & Ryherd, 1997 Guide to geology of the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, 1997). Rock type and geologic processes work together to affect the surficial geology of the Chugach National Forest. Ecological and physical dynamics of the national forest are strongly influenced by snow and ice. Glaciers, in conjunction with both tectonic forces and the erosion from rivers, are responsible for carving the topographic relief of the national forest and associated marine environment. Topography in turn affects environmental elements, such as slope, soil types, weather, drainage patterns, and vegetation types. Past episodes of glacial scouring and tectonic activity result in a legacy of disturbance apparent in regionwide patterns of directional change in topography and ecology. In addition to the long-term effects of glaciers and icefields, annual snow accumulation has an impact on vegetation, streamflow and chemistry, stream morphology, fish, wildlife, recreation opportunities, and a myriad of other things. 21 Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Aquatic Ecosystems—Watersheds This section describes the watershed component of the aquatic ecosystems evaluation. Specific items evaluated include key ecosystem characteristics by geographic area, such as water quantity and water quality, drivers and stressors, and watershed condition and trends. This section also provides a summary of the overall watershed conditions across the national forest based on the national Watershed Condition Framework (WCF) and the Forest Service Watershed Condition Classification (WCC) Technical Guide (Potyondy & Geier, 2010) and an evaluation of watershed integrity. Relevant Information • Watersheds within the Chugach National Forest generally are in good condition, are functioning properly, and have good water quality. Natural processes, such as glaciers, mass wasting, and natural bank erosion, remain the primary sources of sediment loads and turbidity in streams and rivers across the national forest. Human associated water quality concerns exist in limited locations primarily in heavily visited areas close to roads and in developed areas. The following localized water quality concerns exist: erosion, sedimentation, and/or wetland damage from off-highway vehicles (OHVs) on authorized and unauthorized routes; sedimentation and pollutants associated with backcountry motor vehicle use; fecal coliform pollution from recreation related human waste; sedimentation from mining activities; and sedimentation from roads, trails, and recreational activities. • A number of watershed improvement projects have occurred within the national forest since 2002. These projects have improved the function of streams and riparian areas impacted by past or historic land management activities. • Changes in watershed characteristics, such as surface and groundwater quantity, quality, and flow regimes as well as erosion and deposition of sediments are occurring across the national forest. • The primary system driver to Chugach National Forest watersheds is climate change with additional limited and localized stressors of spruce bark beetle infestation, increased invasive aquatic organism and plant infestations, and increased population and/or national forest use. Ecosystems Evaluated Watersheds are useful units to delineate aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. A watershed is the area of a landscape where water from rain or melting snow and ice drains downhill into a body of water, such as a river, lake, reservoir, or ocean. Watersheds include streams and lakes and shallow aquifers, as well as the land surfaces from which water drains. Topography and geology determine where the water flows along with the boundary of each watershed. Small watersheds drain into progressively larger ones, creating a hierarchical structure, or watersheds levels. These watershed delineation levels are based on hydrologic unit codes (HUCs). The Chugach National Forest has 275 6th-level HUC (HUC 6) watersheds that range from 8,000 to more than 300,000 acres spread across the three geographic areas (see table 2 and map 2). Prince William Sound holds nearly half of these. Three watersheds span two geographic areas. Within the Chugach National Forest, most are standard watersheds with a drainage flowing to a single outlet point. Prince William Sound is the exception where the majority of the HUC watersheds are frontal and include several small drainages with more than one outlet along the coastline of the ocean. More than half of Chugach National Forest watersheds have had no modification to natural overland flow and a little more than 40 percent have some glacial component. 22 Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Table 2. Number of HUC 6 watersheds for the three different geographic areas Geographic Area HUC 6 Watersheds Both the Copper River Delta 3 and Prince William Sound Copper River Delta 72 Kenai Peninsula 67 Prince William Sound 133 Total 275 23 Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Map 2. Chugach National Forest Service delineated HUC 6 watersheds by geographic areas and the results of the WCC rating (adapted from (MacFarlane, Zemke, Kelly, Hodges, & DeVelice, 2011)). 24 Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions and Trends Each Chugach National Forest watershed is a network of stream channels that differ in character and are referred to as channel types. Channel types across the national forest vary with landscape and topography and are characterized in the Alaska Region by stream process groups (USDA 2010). These stream process groups are based on primary differences in hydrologic function, landform, and channel morphology and include: estuarine (ES), palustrine (PA), glacial outwash (GO), flood plain (FP), low gradient contained (LC), moderate gradient contained (MC), alluvial fans (AF) and high gradient contained (HC) (see figure 1). Figure 2 displays the lengths and distribution of the different channel type process groups across the geographic areas. Overall, Prince William Sound has the most stream miles, followed by the Copper River Delta and then the Kenai Peninsula. The Copper River Delta has the highest percentage of GO, PA, and ES channel types with the Kenai Peninsula having very minimal ES channels due to its more interior and mountainous topography. Prince William Sound and Kenai Peninsula tend to be dominated more by HC channel types, followed by GO and then some of the more moderate gradient channel types (MM and MC). Individual channel type classification units within each process group are defined by physical attributes, such as channel width and/or incision depth, gradient, and channel pattern. Figure 1. The Alaska Region channel type process groups displayed across the typical landscape (USDA, 2010b). 25 Chapter 2 Ecological Conditions
Recommended publications
  • Applicability of Coloured Traps for the Monitoring of the Invasive Zigzag Elm Sawfly, Aproceros Leucopoda (Hymenoptera: Argidae)

    Applicability of Coloured Traps for the Monitoring of the Invasive Zigzag Elm Sawfly, Aproceros Leucopoda (Hymenoptera: Argidae)

    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 62(2), pp. 165–173, 2016 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.62.2.165.2016 APPLICABILITY OF COLOURED TRAPS FOR THE MONITORING OF THE INVASIVE ZIGZAG ELM SAWFLY, APROCEROS LEUCOPODA (HYMENOPTERA: ARGIDAE) Gábor Vétek1, Veronika Papp1, JÓzsef Fail1, Márta Ladányi2 and Stephan M. Blank3 1Department of Entomology, Szent István University H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29–43, Hungary; E-mails: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Biometrics and Agricultural Informatics, Szent István University H-1118 Budapest, Villányi út 29–43, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] 3Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany; E-mail: [email protected] Aproceros leucopoda (Hymenoptera: Argidae), native to East Asia, is an invasive pest of elms (Ulmus spp.) recently reported from several European countries. The identification of ef- fective and practical tools suitable for detecting and monitoring the species has become necessary. As no trapping methods have been developed for A. leucopoda yet, in this study we compared white, yellow and fluorescent yellow sticky “cloak” traps for their appli- cability for catching adults. The experiment was carried out in a mixed forest plantation of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) and Siberian elm (Ulmus pumila), the latter infested heavily with A. leucopoda, in Hungary, 2012. Both the yellow and fluorescent yellow sticky “cloak” traps proved suitable for capturing high numbers of individuals of A. leucopoda, while the white traps caught significantly less adults. Trapping with the former coloured traps, completed with the inspection of host plants, may be recommended for the detection and monitoring of the pest.
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance

    DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance

    Page 1 of 44 DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 99.245.208.197 on 09/06/16 1 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. Page 2 of 44 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa. Because of their importance as pests and disease vectors impacting global agriculture and forestry, DNA barcode results on these arthropods have significant implications for quarantine detection, regulation, and management.
  • Evidence and Implications of Recent and Projected Climate Change in Alaska’S Forest Ecosystems 1, 2 1 3 4 JANE M

    Evidence and Implications of Recent and Projected Climate Change in Alaska’S Forest Ecosystems 1, 2 1 3 4 JANE M

    Evidence and implications of recent and projected climate change in Alaska’s forest ecosystems 1, 2 1 3 4 JANE M. WOLKEN, TERESA N. HOLLINGSWORTH, T. SCOTT RUPP, F. STUART CHAPIN, III, SARAH F. TRAINOR, 5 6 7 3 8 TARA M. BARRETT, PATRICK F. SULLIVAN, A. DAVID MCGUIRE, EUGENIE S. EUSKIRCHEN, PAUL E. HENNON, 9 10 11 8 1 ERIK A. BEEVER, JEFF S. CONN, LISA K. CRONE, DAVID V. D ’AMORE, NANCY FRESCO, 8 3 12 11 13 THOMAS A. HANLEY, KNUT KIELLAND, JAMES J. KRUSE, TRISTA PATTERSON, EDWARD A. G. SCHUUR, 14 14 DAVID L. VERBYLA, AND JOHN YARIE 1Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning, University of Alaska, 3352 College Road, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 USA 2United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Boreal Ecology Cooperative Research Unit, P.O. Box 756780, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 3Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 4Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy, University of Alaska, 3352 College Road, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709 USA 5United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Anchorage Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3301 C Street, Suite 200, Anchorage, Alaska 99503 USA 6Environment and Natural Resources Institute, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska, Anchorage, Alaska 99508 USA 7United States Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775 USA 8United States Department of Agriculture Forest
  • Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science

    Cover Sheet for Proposal to the National Science

    COVER SHEET FOR PROPOSAL TO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT/SOLICITATION NO./CLOSING DATE/if not in response to a program announcement/solicitation enter NSF 10-1 FOR NSF USE ONLY NSF 10-1 NSF PROPOSAL NUMBER FOR CONSIDERATION BY NSF ORGANIZATION UNIT(S) (Indicate the most specific unit known, i.e. program, division, etc.) DEB - Long-Term Ecological Research DATE RECEIVED NUMBER OF COPIES DIVISION ASSIGNED FUND CODE DUNS# (Data Universal Numbering System) FILE LOCATION 615245164 EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN) OR SHOW PREVIOUS AWARD NO. IF THIS IS IS THIS PROPOSAL BEING SUBMITTED TO ANOTHER FEDERAL TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (TIN) A RENEWAL AGENCY? YES NO IF YES, LIST ACRONYM(S) AN ACCOMPLISHMENT-BASED RENEWAL 926000147 NAME OF ORGANIZATION TO WHICH AWARD SHOULD BE MADE ADDRESS OF AWARDEE ORGANIZATION, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE Adm Svcs Ctr Rm 109 University of Alaska Fairbanks Campus 3295 College Road AWARDEE ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) Fairbanks, AK 99709-3705 0010637000 NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE ADDRESS OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION, IF DIFFERENT, INCLUDING 9 DIGIT ZIP CODE PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE (IF KNOWN) IS AWARDEE ORGANIZATION (Check All That Apply) SMALL BUSINESS MINORITY BUSINESS IF THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL (See GPG II.C For Definitions) FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATION WOMAN-OWNED BUSINESS THEN CHECK HERE TITLE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Regional consequences of changing climate-disturbance interactions for the resilience of Alaska’s boreal forest REQUESTED AMOUNT PROPOSED DURATION (1-60 MONTHS) REQUESTED STARTING DATE SHOW RELATED PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL NO. IF APPLICABLE $ 5,640,000 72 months 12/01/10 CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX(ES) IF THIS PROPOSAL INCLUDES ANY OF THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW BEGINNING INVESTIGATOR (GPG I.G.2) HUMAN SUBJECTS (GPG II.D.7) Human Subjects Assurance Number DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (GPG II.C.1.e) Exemption Subsection or IRB App.
  • Taxonomic Review of the Genus Empria Lepeletier & Serville

    Taxonomic Review of the Genus Empria Lepeletier & Serville

    JHR 74: 1–25 (2019) Taxonomic review of South Korean Empria 1 doi: 10.3897/jhr.74.39299 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net Taxonomic review of the genus Empria Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) in South Korea: morphological and molecular identification of two new species Bia Park1, Marko Prous2,3, Jong-Wook Lee1 1 Department of Life-Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, South Korea 2 Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Str. 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 3 Department of Zoology, Insti- tute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Corresponding author: Jong-Wook Lee ([email protected]) Academic editor: Michael Ohl | Received 21 August 2019 | Accepted 30 October 2019 | Published 30 December 2019 http://zoobank.org/37129EA7-951F-4B3F-AF76-EEF3E25D77FE Citation: Park B, Prous M, Lee J-W (2019) Taxonomic review of the genus Empria Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) in South Korea: morphological and molecular identification of two new species. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 74: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.74.39299 Abstract The sawfly genus Empria Lepeletier & Serville (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae: Allantinae) is reviewed in South Korea and four species are reported as new in the country: Empria lycroi Prous & Park, sp. nov. (also Russia); E. nigroterga Park & Lee, sp. nov. (also Russia); E. wui Wei & Nie (also Japan); and E. zhangi Wei & Yan (also Russia). Tenthredo magnicornis Eversmann, 1864, syn. nov. is treated as a synonym of E. candidata (Fallén, 1808). A key to the six species currently known from South Korea and photographs of the diagnostic characters for each species are presented.
  • The Green Alder Sawfly in Southeast Alaska

    The Green Alder Sawfly in Southeast Alaska

    The Green Alder Sawfly in Southeast Alaska Elizabeth Graham, PhD USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection GAS in Southeast Alaska Elizabeth Graham, PhD USDA Forest Service Forest Health Protection What is a sawfly? • HymenopteraSymphytaTenthredinoidea • Named for their sawlike ovipositor Common Sawflies (Tenthredinidae, Diprionidae) • Hardwood and conifer feeders • Leaf feeders – External – Miners • Diverse appearance • Arge, Cimbex, Neodiprion, Phylocolpa, Pikonema, Pristophora, Susana, Trichiocampus Green Alder Sawfly • Monsoma pulveratum (Retzius) • Native to Europe, North Africa and the Near East • Preferred host is European black alder (Alnus glutinosa). Discovery of GAS in Alaska • GAS was first collected in Southcentral Alaska in 2007 during an assessment of riparian thin- leaf alder defoliation • Collection records show it was in Palmer in 2004 • Since positive identification GAS was found actively feeding in Anchorage, Kenai, Seward, Mat-Su valley, and Fairbanks. • 2010 sawfly was discovered in Washington Discovery of GAS in Southeast Alaska • Bob Gorman, CES agent in Sitka, contacted FHP in Juneau after getting calls about a “large green caterpillar” feeding on red alder • Specimens were sent and identified as GAS • GAS was found actively feeding on red alder in multiple locations throughout Sitka • GAS was then found in Juneau and Ketchikan Striped Alder Sawfly Striped Alder Sawfly Leaf Miners • Multiple species, multiple orders – Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera • Defoliation is at its worst in warm and dry climates • Larvae bore
  • Suction Dredge Mining Impacts on Pacific Lamprey Populations and Habitat in Washington State: a Case Study of the Entiat River

    Suction Dredge Mining Impacts on Pacific Lamprey Populations and Habitat in Washington State: a Case Study of the Entiat River

    Suction dredge mining impacts on Pacific lamprey populations and habitat in Washington State: A case study of the Entiat River __________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ___________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Cultural and Environmental Resource Management ___________________________________ by Jaime Lee Liljegren August 2019 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Jaime Lee Liljegren Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Anthony Gabriel, Committee Chair ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Karl Lillquist ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Clay Arango ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT SUCTION DREDGE MINING IMPACTS ON PACIFIC LAMPREY POPULATIONS AND HABITAT IN WASHINGTON STATE: A CASE STUDY OF THE ENTIAT RIVER by Jaime Liljegren Suction dredge mining is a largely unregulated recreational activity in Washington State with potentially significant impacts to aquatic habitat. Although dredging has the potential to cause Widespread ecological effects, only impacts to select species have been thoroughly assessed. Due to their reliance on freshwater habitat throughout multiple life stages, Pacific lamprey are significantly vulnerable to impacts from dredging practices.
  • Step 3 - Current Conditions

    Step 3 - Current Conditions

    Step 3 - Current Conditions INTRODUCTION - This step describes the current occurs during summer thunderstorms. Winter range, distribution and condition of ecosystem precipitation occurs mainly as snow above 4,000 feet elements. It is organized by Issue as presented in elevation, and mainly as rain below that elevation. Step 2 and answers Key Questions identified for Fluctuation of the snow level occasionally results in each issue of this step. rain causing rapid snow melt. PRECIPITATION AQUATICS The precipitation record is characterized by two distinct climate trends (Table 3-1). These alternating periods of wet and dry conditions lasted for a few HILLSLOPE PROCESSES decades. The short duration of the record and irregular nature of climatic change preclude Key Question 1- What are the dominant forecasting of these periods. The drier periods are of hydrologic and erosional characteristics and approximately 40 inches average annual processes within these watersheds, including precipitation, the wetter are of approximately 60 impacts of the 1997 flood? inches. The Happy Camp record, along with longer records from Eureka and other stations in Landslides introduce large volumes of coarse northwestern California, indicate that the period 1870 sediment to streams during episodes of intense to 1910 was a wet time; 1911 to 1937 dry; 1938 to precipitation. This results in changes in the structure 1975 wet; 1976 to 1994 dry and 1995 to present wet. of stream channels and the quality of instream Intense precipitation of 1982-83 and 1997 are related habitat. Episodes of large amounts of sediment to strong El Niño effects. The probability of production are followed by about 10 years of rapid occurrence of rare, intense storms is higher during adjustment of channel geometry.
  • Empria Longicornis Species Group: Taxonomic Revision with Notes on Phylogeny and Ecology (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae)

    Empria Longicornis Species Group: Taxonomic Revision with Notes on Phylogeny and Ecology (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae)

    Zootaxa 2756: 1–39 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Empria longicornis species group: taxonomic revision with notes on phylogeny and ecology (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) MARKO PROUS, MIKK HEIDEMAA & VILLU SOON Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014 Tartu, Estonia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Material and methods . 3 Results . 9 Morphology . 9 Molecular phylogenetic analyses . 12 Larvae and host plants . 19 Taxonomy . 20 Empria alector Benson, 1938 . 21 Empria alpina Benson, 1938 . 22 Empria basalis Lindqvist, 1968 . 22 Empria japonica Heidemaa & Prous, sp. nov. 22 Empria loktini Ermolenko, 1971 . 24 Empria longicornis (Thomson, 1871) . 24 Empria minuta Lindqvist, 1968 . 25 Empria mongolica (Konow, 1895) . 25 Empria tridens (Konow, 1896) . 26 Key to species (imagines) . 32 Discussion . 32 Acknowledgements . 36 References . 36 Abstract The Empria longicornis species group (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae) is revised. Empria japonica Heidemaa & Prous, sp. nov. is described from Japan. The lectotypes of Empria gussakovskii Dovnar-Zapolskij, 1929, E. konowi Dovnar-Za- polskij, 1929, Poecilosoma longicornis Thomson, 1871, P. mongolica Konow, 1895, and P. tridens Konow, 1896 are de- signated. Empria konowi Dovnar-Zapolskij, 1929 (syn. nov.) and E. gussakovskii Dovnar-Zapolskij, 1929 (syn. nov.) are synonymized with E. tridens (Konow, 1896), and Empria waldstaetterense Liston, 1980 (syn. nov.) with E. alector Ben- son, 1938. Empria alpina Benson, 1938 and E. minuta Lindqvist, 1968, earlier misidentified as E. gussakovskii, are treated as valid species.
  • Alaska Region Pathways Animal Introductions Alaska Has a Long History of Animal Tricia L

    Alaska Region Pathways Animal Introductions Alaska Has a Long History of Animal Tricia L

    This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be 336 construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. Appendix: Regional Summaries Alaska Region Pathways Animal Introductions Alaska has a long history of animal Tricia L. Wurtz and Bethany K. Schulz introductions, especially on its islands (Bailey 1993; Paul 2009). The frst deliberate releases of Arctic foxes (Vulpes Introduction lagopus) for fox ranching on several Aleutian Islands Alaska has fewer invasive species and is less impacted by occurred in 1750 (Black 1984); the frst known accidental invasive species than most places on Earth. Until recently, release of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) was prior to 1780 Alaska has been protected by its cold climate and by its via a shipwreck (Brechbill 1977). The rats spread so comparative lack of roads and other development. prolifcally that the island where the shipwreck occurred However, these barriers are eroding. Warming climate later came to be known as Rat Island (Ebbert and Byrd 2002). trends and longer shoulder seasons have reduced the cli- It was the site of an intensive, successful rat eradication mate flter that so far may have prevented some invasive effort in 2008 for the purpose of restoring seabird nesting species from establishing in the State (Figs. A1.1 and A1.2; habitat (Croll et al. 2016; Dunham 2012; Fritts 2007; USFWS Carlson et al. 2015; Jarnevich et al. 2014; Sanderson et al. 2007). Cattle (Bos taurus), Sitka black-tailed deer 2012; Wolken et al.
  • Wild Salmon Center

    Wild Salmon Center

    Wild Salmon Center > Annual Report 2017 President’s Letter Free-fl owing rivers and their The Wild Salmon Center and our local partners have now seasonal runs of wild fi sh are won legal protections for almost 9 million acres of land in cherished by local people, strongholds, secured wild fi sh management agreements and fi shermen, indigenous designations in 68 watersheds in the Russian Far East and communities, and anglers, Pacifi c Northwest, and have established 13 new conservation until something bad happens groups throughout the Pacifi c Rim. that puts the river ecosystem This year, we are helping lead a major partner-based and its wild fi sh into long-term campaign in Alaska (see page 9), have three more large decline. It might come in the watersheds being added to Russia's network of regional form of a big development protected areas (see page 14), and are helping launch a new such as a dam, or a large-scale initiative in British Columbia (see page 19). mining project like the Pebble Mine proposed for the headwaters of Bristol Bay, Alaska. As climate change warms our rivers, and the demands of Or it can come in the form of “death by a thousand cuts,” the growing economies of the Pacifi c Rim for food, water, including illegal fi shing, clear-cut logging, hatchery fi sh minerals and energy threaten even the most remote river programs, or water withdrawals for agriculture. systems, we must secure our great salmon, trout and steelhead ecosystems. We must preserve them as reservoirs We have learned over two decades of work that the most of salmon genetic and life history diversity, safeguarded by effective protection of a salmon river comes before the ancient forests, cold clear fl ows and local people who are damage is done.
  • Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) Newly Recorded from Washington State

    Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) Newly Recorded from Washington State

    JHR 49: 129–159 (2016)Sawflies( Hymenoptera, Symphyta) newly recorded from Washington State 129 doi: 10.3897/JHR.49.7104 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) newly recorded from Washington State Chris Looney1, David R. Smith2, Sharon J. Collman3, David W. Langor4, Merrill A. Peterson5 1 Washington State Dept. of Agriculture, 1111 Washington St. SE, Olympia, Washington, 98504, USA 2 Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, c/o National Museum of Natural History, NHB 168, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA 3 Washington State University Extension, 600 128th St. SE, Everett, Washington, 98208, USA 4 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, 5320 122 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6H 3S5, Canada 5 Biology Department, Western Washington University, 516 High St., Bellingham, Washington, 98225, USA Corresponding author: Chris Looney ([email protected]) Academic editor: H. Baur | Received 5 November 2015 | Accepted 27 January 2016 | Published 28 April 2016 http://zoobank.org/319E4CAA-6B1F-408D-8A84-E202E14B26FC Citation: Looney C, Smith DR, Collman SJ, Langor DW, Peterson MA (2016) Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) newly recorded from Washington State. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 49: 129–159. doi: 10.3897/JHR.49.7104 Abstract Examination of museum specimens, unpublished collection data, and field surveys conducted between 2010 and 2014 resulted in records for 22 species of sawflies new to Washington State, seven of which are likely to be pest problems in ornamental landscapes. These data highlight the continued range expansion of exotic species across North America. These new records also indicate that our collective knowledge of Pacific Northwest arthropod biodiversity and biogeography is underdeveloped, even for a relatively well known and species-poor group of insects.