THE SIGNIFICANCE of the TOAD, Rhinella Marina, in OLMEC ART A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE SIGNIFICANCE of the TOAD, Rhinella Marina, in OLMEC ART A THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TOAD, Rhinella marina, IN OLMEC ART A Thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of ^ 0 * 2 ^ 0 the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Humanities by Mette Fordan San Francisco, California January 2020 Copyright by Mette Fordan 2020 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read The Significance of the Toad Rhinella marina in Olmec art by Mette Foidan, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Humanities at San Francisco State University. Mariana K. Leal Ferreira Ph.D. Professor THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TOAD, Rhinella marina, IN OLMEC ART Mette Fordan San Francisco, California 2020 The Olmec inhabited Mesoamerica from approximately 1500 B.C. to 100 A.D. The theory behind this study has been that the Toad, Rhinella marina, was a sacred being to the Olmec and that it represented the concept of duality in its ability to live in two worlds, the wet and the dry, in water and on land. The biological characteristics of toads, a dual existence in water and on land, becomes, in mythology, the ability to navigate between the realms of life/death and upper/lower worlds in a mythical cosmos. These characteristics represent transformation, metamorphosis, and regeneration, all-important religious concepts to the Olmec and are present in Olmec art. The toad’s capacity to symbolically traverse the different levels of the cosmos gives the animal its supernatural powers. The hallucinogenic properties of parotid gland secretions played an essential role in the iconography of transformation, metamorphosis, and regeneration in shamanic rituals. These processes are a narrative of the power of a ruler/shaman and his journey into (or, emergence from) the underworld. The toad is the symbol which legitimizes his power and right to undertake such a journey. This study has identified those traits of the toad, both natural and symbolic, that would bring the animal out from obscurity and on to its rightful place in the Olmec pantheon. I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. 'jW'reOC*! 1^/(3 1^0 Chair, Thesis Committee Date PREFACE AND/OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Mariana Ferreira, Ph.D for her interest and guidance throughout all aspects of this study. While serving as my Committee Chair, her continued support and suggestions have been vital to the completion of this thesis. Your friendship and encouragement mean more to me than I can adequately express. I would also like to express my sincere appreciation to Dr. Logan Hennesy, Ph.D. for serving as the committee’s second reader. Additionally, I would like to thank Barry Fordan, my husband, for his suggestions, comments, and editing of my written work. His moral support during some trying moments at SFSU is deeply appreciated. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables.................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures.................................................................................................................. viii Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: History of Mexico and Olmec Territories..........................................................5 Chronology of Olmec Civilization.................................................................... 9 The Rise of Olmec Civilization During the Early Formative Period................15 The Middle Formative Period and the Olmec..................................................16 Tres Zapotes and the Olmec During the Late Formative Period.................... 20 Chaper 2: Olmec Art and the Art of the Toad..................................................................22 Chapter 3: Toad, Rhinella marina, Symbolism................................................................ 43 Religious Concepts Relating to the Toad in Olmec Art................................ 45 Symbolic, Mythological and Religious Theories.......................................... 47 Conclusion.........................................................................................................................60 References cited................................................................................................................ 64 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Summary of M esoamerican Chronology.......................................................6 2. Time Periods with Major Olmec Sites and Local Time Phases.................... 11 3. Catalog of Material........................................................................................27 LIST OF FIGURES Figures Page 1. Maize God, San Bartolo, Guatemala................................................................ 13 2. Olmec Maize God, La Venta............................................................................ 14 3. Map of La Venta............................................................................................... 19 4. Figures in La Venta Complex A.......................................................................20 5. Map of Tres Zapotes.........................................................................................21 6. Xochipala Toad Bowl.......................................................................................29 7. Toad Bowl, Paso de Amada.............................................................................30 8. Toad Bolder......................................................................................................31 9. Olmec Shaman..................................................................................................32 10. Takalik Abaj, Izapa and Kaminaljuyu..............................................................33 11. Toad Altar 1......................................................................................................34 12. Toad Altar 2......................................................................................................34 13. Toad Altar 3......................................................................................................34 14. Toad Basin, Kaminaljuyu.................................................................................36 15. Stele 6, Izapa.....................................................................................................37 16. Izapa Ruler Transformation..............................................................................38 17. Toad Yolk.........................................................................................................40 18. ToadHacha.......................................................................................................41 19. Toad Palett with trough.....................................................................................42 20. Toad with Bowl.................................................................................................42 21. Olmec Baby Figurine........................................................................................45 22. Flame Brows.....................................................................................................49 LIST OF FIGURES Figures Page 23. Chalcatzingo Relief...........................................................................................52 24. Chac with Amphibian Tongue..........................................................................52 25. Earth Monster with an Open Mouth..................................................................55 26. La Venta Monument 4.......................................................................................57 27. Toad Ingesting Molted Skin..............................................................................58 1 Introduction The rainforests of Central America and Mexico harbor a ferocious and dangerous predator. A traveler to these regions would likely encounter the animal since it breeds prolifically and at great speed. When threatened, it secretes a dangerous milky substance from a pair of parotid glands on the head that can cause heart attack and death in humans. This predator is the Toad, Rhinella marina. Heavily built with short legs, this species has no web between its toes. Adult animals have a rough, warty skin of tan, dull green, or black color. They can grow up to 9 inches in length and weigh more than two pounds (Ufwildlife, 2011). Like other amphibians, toads depend on bodies of water in which to lay their eggs. They exist equally well on land. Toads are omnivorous and will eat almost anything available, such as insects, other smaller amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals (Ufwildlife, 2011). Throughout Central America, Mesoamerican people created a wealth of highly expressive art around this omnipresent animal. Bufo marinus L. (1758) was the toad species inhabiting the Olmec territory. At some point in time, 2000-2017, taxonomists in biology re-classified the animal as Rhinella marina L. (1758). Such re-classifications exist whenever one species is determined by taxonomists to be misclassified and is identical to another species. The species, Bufo alvarius, is a separate, different species from Rhinella marina and is indigenous to the Sonoran region of Mexico but, does not inhabit the Olmec territories. The study of Mesoamerican art has produced a large corpus of material on the importance
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds Mosley Dianna Wilson University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Wilson, Mosley Dianna, "Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 853. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/853 ANCIENT MAYA AFTERLIFE ICONOGRAPHY: TRAVELING BETWEEN WORLDS by DIANNA WILSON MOSLEY B.A. University of Central Florida, 2000 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Liberal Studies in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2006 i ABSTRACT The ancient Maya afterlife is a rich and voluminous topic. Unfortunately, much of the material currently utilized for interpretations about the ancient Maya comes from publications written after contact by the Spanish or from artifacts with no context, likely looted items. Both sources of information can be problematic and can skew interpretations. Cosmological tales documented after the Spanish invasion show evidence of the religious conversion that was underway. Noncontextual artifacts are often altered in order to make them more marketable. An example of an iconographic theme that is incorporated into the surviving media of the ancient Maya, but that is not mentioned in ethnographically-recorded myths or represented in the iconography from most noncontextual objects, are the “travelers”: a group of gods, humans, and animals who occupy a unique niche in the ancient Maya cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Megaliths and the Early Mezcala Urban Tradition of Mexico
    ICDIGITAL Separata 44-45/5 ALMOGAREN 44-45/2013-2014MM131 ICDIGITAL Eine PDF-Serie des Institutum Canarium herausgegeben von Hans-Joachim Ulbrich Technische Hinweise für den Leser: Die vorliegende Datei ist die digitale Version eines im Jahrbuch "Almogaren" ge- druckten Aufsatzes. Aus technischen Gründen konnte – nur bei Aufsätzen vor 1990 – der originale Zeilenfall nicht beibehalten werden. Das bedeutet, dass Zeilen- nummern hier nicht unbedingt jenen im Original entsprechen. Nach wie vor un- verändert ist jedoch der Text pro Seite, so dass Zitate von Textstellen in der ge- druckten wie in der digitalen Version identisch sind, d.h. gleiche Seitenzahlen (Pa- ginierung) aufweisen. Der im Aufsatzkopf erwähnte Erscheinungsort kann vom Sitz der Gesellschaft abweichen, wenn die Publikation nicht im Selbstverlag er- schienen ist (z.B. Vereinssitz = Hallein, Verlagsort = Graz wie bei Almogaren III). Die deutsche Rechtschreibung wurde – mit Ausnahme von Literaturzitaten – den aktuellen Regeln angepasst. Englischsprachige Keywords wurden zum Teil nach- träglich ergänzt. PDF-Dokumente des IC lassen sich mit dem kostenlosen Adobe Acrobat Reader (Version 7.0 oder höher) lesen. Für den Inhalt der Aufsätze sind allein die Autoren verantwortlich. Dunkelrot gefärbter Text kennzeichnet spätere Einfügungen der Redaktion. Alle Vervielfältigungs- und Medien-Rechte dieses Beitrags liegen beim Institutum Canarium Hauslabgasse 31/6 A-1050 Wien IC-Separatas werden für den privaten bzw. wissenschaftlichen Bereich kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt. Digitale oder gedruckte Kopien von diesen PDFs herzu- stellen und gegen Gebühr zu verbreiten, ist jedoch strengstens untersagt und be- deutet eine schwerwiegende Verletzung der Urheberrechte. Weitere Informationen und Kontaktmöglichkeiten: institutum-canarium.org almogaren.org Abbildung Titelseite: Original-Umschlag des gedruckten Jahrbuches.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing Izapa
    Ancient Mesoamerica, 29 (2018), 255–264 Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2018 doi:10.1017/S0956536118000494 INTRODUCING IZAPA Robert M. Rosenswiga and Julia Guernseyb aDepartment of Anthropology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York 12222 bDepartment of Art and Art History, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78705 Abstract This paper introduces the articles that comprise this Special Issue on Izapa. First, we review early reporting and assessments of Izapa’s monuments as well as archaeological investigations undertaken at the site during the twentieth century. Next, we describe more recent developments in interpretation and new archeological excavations and survey data collected during the past two decades. The papers in this Special Issue present new information that contribute to our evolving understanding of Izapa during the millennium that stretches from the Middle Formative period through the Middle Classic period (700 b.c.–a.d. 600). They serve as a status report on our understanding of the still largely enigmatic ancient kingdom, its regional structure, and connections to contemporaneous Isthmian sites. INTRODUCTION Blanca collapsed after a few centuries, and population declined in the immediate region. Its demise was a continuation of a millennium Izapa followed a trajectory of settled life that began at the beginning of political volatility characterized by a succession of polities coa- of the second millennium b.c. in the Soconusco region of Chiapas lescing and collapsing on the coastal plain (Love 2002b, 2007, and neighboring Guatemala (Figure 1). A series of Early Formative 2011). This rise-and-fall sequence provided the context in which (1900–1000 b.c., all dates calibrated) centers characterize the mounded architecture was adopted at Izapa sometime around 800 Mazatán zone of the Soconusco region (Clark and Pye 2000; b.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carved Human Femprs from Tomb 1, Chiapa De Corzo, Chiapas, Mexico
    PAPERS of the NEW WOR LD ARCHAEOLO G ICAL FOUNDATION NUMBER SIX THE CARVED HUMAN FEMPRS FROM TOMB 1, CHIAPA DE CORZO, CHIAPAS, MEXICO by PIERRE AGRINIER PUBLICATION No. 5 NEW WORLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ORINDA, CALIFORNIA 1960 NEW WORLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION 1960 OFFICERS THOMAS STUART FERGUSON, President 1 Irving Lane, Orinda, California ALFRED V. KIDDER, PH.D., First Vice-President MILTON R. HUNTER, PH.D., Vice-President ScoTT H. DUNHAM, Secretary-Treasurer J. ALDEN MASON, PH.D., Editor and Field Advisor GARETH W. LowE, Field Director, 1956-1959 FREDRICK A. PETERSON, Field Director, 1959-1960 DIRECTORS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SCOTT H. DUNHAM, C.P.A. PEDRO ARMILLAS, PH.D. THOMAS STUART FERGUSON, ESQ. GORDON F. EKHOLM, PH.D. M. WELLS JAKEMAN, PH.D. J. POULSON HUNTER, M.D. ALFRED V. KIDDER, PH.D. MILTON R. HUNTER, PH.D. ALFRED V. KIDDER, PH.D. EDITORIAL OFFICE NICHOLAS G. MORGAN, SR. ALDEN MASON LE GRAND RICHARDS J. UNIVERSITY MUSEUM ERNEST A. STRONG UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Philadelphia 4, Pa. J. ALDEN MASON EDITOR Orders for and correspondence regarding the publications of The New World Archaeological Foundation should be sent to SCOTT H. DUNHAM, Secretary 510 Crocker Building San Francisco 4, California Price $2.00 Printed by THE LEGAL INTELLIGENCER Philadelphia 4, Pa. PAPERS of the NEW WOR LD ARCHAEOLO G ICAL FOUNDATION NUMBER SIX THE CARVED HUMAN FEMURS FROM TOMB 1, CHIAP A DE CORZO, CHIAPAS, MEXICO by PIERRE AGRINIER PUB LICATION No. 5 NEW WoRLD ARCHAEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ORINDA, CALIFORNIA 1960 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 I. DESCRIPTION ..•...........•......................•... 2 Bone 1 .................................... 2 Bone 2 2 Bone 3 2 Bone 4 3 Technique ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Michael M. Hobby, June M. Hobby, and Troy J
    Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 8 Number 1 Article 12 1996 Michael M. Hobby, June M. Hobby, and Troy J. Smith. Angular Chronology: The Precolumbian Dating of Ancient America V. Garth Norman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Norman, V. Garth (1996) "Michael M. Hobby, June M. Hobby, and Troy J. Smith. Angular Chronology: The Precolumbian Dating of Ancient America," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 8 : No. 1 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol8/iss1/12 This Historical and Cultural Studies is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Author(s) V. Garth Norman Reference FARMS Review of Books 8/1 (1996): 112–17. ISSN 1099-9450 (print), 2168-3123 (online) Abstract Review of Angular Chronology: The Precolumbian Dating of Ancient America (1994), by Michael M. Hobby, June M. Hobby, and Troy J. Smith. Michael M. Hobby, June M. Hobby, and Troy J. Smith. Angular Chronology: The Precolumbian Dating of Ancient America. Coto Laurel, Puerto Rico: Zarahemla Foundation, 1994. 81 pp. $6.95 Reviewed by V. Garth Norman This publication by the Zarahemla Foundation (ZF, not to be confused with the Zarahemla Research Foundation), with Michael M . Hobby as director and principal author, purports to enlighten Book of Mormon students by revealing startling di scoveries on the realities of Book of Mormon geography and history.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: a Step Toward Improved Interpretation
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 8 Number 1 Article 6 1-31-1999 A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation John E. Clark Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Clark, John E. (1999) "A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 8 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol8/iss1/6 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title A New Artistic Rendering of Izapa Stela 5: A Step toward Improved Interpretation Author(s) John E. Clark Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 8/1 (1999): 22–33, 77. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract Aided by creative techniques, Ajáx Moreno carefully prepared more accurate, detailed renderings of the Izapa monuments, including Stela 5, with its com- plex scenes of gods and other supernatural creatures, royalty, animals invested with mythic and value symbolism, and mortals. The author raises relevant questions about reconciling Jakeman’s view with the new drawing: Are there Old World connections? Can Izapa be viewed as a Book of Mormon city? Did the Nephites know of Lehi’s dream? Are there name glyphs on the stela? The scene, if it does not depict Lehi’s dream, fits clearly in Mesoamerican art in theme, style, technical execution, and meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Modern Monumentality: Art, Science, and the Making of Southern Mexico Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2fg292mm Author Kett, Robert John Publication Date 2015 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2fg292mm#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Modern Monumentality: Art, Science, and the Making of Southern Mexico DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Anthropology by Robert John Kett Dissertation Committee: Associate Professor Mei Zhan, Chair Professor George Marcus Professor Bill Maurer Associate Professor Rachel O’Toole 2015 Earlier version of Chapter 1 © 2014 California Academy of Sciences Earlier version of Chapter 5 © 2015 University of California Press All other material © 2015 Robert John Kett Dedication For Sue, Dwight, and Albert and in memory of Bob and Peggy. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv CURRICULUM VITAE v ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION vi INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 Ornithologists in Olman: Epistemological Ecologies in the Field and the Museum 20 CHAPTER 2 Pan-American Itineraries: Incorporating the Southern Mexican Frontier 44 CHAPTER 3 Modern Frictions: Plays for Territory at La Venta 74 CHAPTER 4 Monumentality as Method: Archaeology and Land Art in the Cold War 103 CHAPTER 5 Archiving Oil: The Practice and Politics of Information 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY 171 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has benefitted from the kindness of many mentors, friends, family members, and collaborators. I would first like to thank my advisor, Mei Zhan, for being such a sympathetic guide during the conception and execution of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael E. Smith Curriculum Vitae for Posting Feb
    Michael E. Smith Curriculum Vitae For Posting Feb. 1, 2020 Email: [email protected] Home page: https://asu.academia.edu/MichaelESmith ResearcherID: A-2935-2008; ORCID identification no: 0000-0002-0677-8206; Scopus: 55495919500 Address School of Human Evolution & Social Change Phone: 480-727-9520 (office) Box 872402 480-272-3308 (cell) Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 Office: SHESC-104C Education • Ph.D., Anthropology, 1983: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (8/79 - 8/82). • MA, Anthropology, 1979: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (8/75 - 12/78). • BA, Anthropology, 1975: Brandeis University, Waltham, MA (9/71 - 12/74); (degree awarded Magna Cum Laude with Highest Honors in Anthropology. Present Positions • Professor, School of Human Evolution & Social Change, Arizona State University (2005 - ). • Director, ASU Teotihuacan Research Laboratory (2015 - ). • Affiliated faculty, School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, ASU (2013 - ). • Core faculty, Center for Social Dynamics and Complexity (2013 - ). • Fellow, ASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems (2014 - ). • Investigador especial, El Colegio Mexiquense (2007 - ). Past Academic Positions • University at Albany, SUNY, Department of Anthropology: Professor, 1996-2005; Associate Professor, 1991-1996. • Loyola University of Chicago, Department of Sociology and Anthropology: Associate Professor, 1988-1990; Assistant Professor, 1983-1988; Lecturer, 1982. Visiting Academic Positions • Aarhus University, Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (School of Culture and Society), Visiting Professor, April – July, 2018. • University of Bonn, Research Training Group 1878, Archaeology of Pre-Modern Economies. Mercator Fellow, May – July, 2017. Research Areas • Mesoamerican archaeology and ethnohistory: Specialist in Aztecs and Teotihuacan. • Comparative urbanism: Premodern neighborhoods & urban life; urban scaling of premodern cities; modern relevance of ancient cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Olmecs: Where the Sidewalk Begins Jeffrey Benson Western Oregon University
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2005 Olmecs: Where the Sidewalk Begins Jeffrey Benson Western Oregon University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the Latin American History Commons Recommended Citation Benson, Jeffrey, "Olmecs: Where the Sidewalk Begins" (2005). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 126. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/126 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Olmecs: Where the Sidewalk Begins By Jeffrey Benson Western Oregon University An In Depth Look at the Olmec Controversy Mother Culture or Sister Culture 1 The discovery of the Olmecs has caused archeologists, scientists, historians and scholars from various fields to reevaluate the research of the Olmecs on account of the highly discussed and argued areas of debate that surround the people known as the Olmecs. Given that the Olmecs have only been studied in a more thorough manner for only about a half a century, today we have been able to study this group with more overall gathered information of Mesoamerica and we have been able to take a more technological approach to studying the Olmecs. The studies of the Olmecs reveals much information about who these people were, what kind of a civilization they had, but more importantly the studies reveal a linkage between the Olmecs as a mother culture to later established civilizations including the Mayas, Teotihuacan and other various city- states of Mesoamerica.
    [Show full text]
  • Formative Mexican Chiefdoms and the Myth of the "Mother Culture"
    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19, 1–37 (2000) doi:10.1006/jaar.1999.0359, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Formative Mexican Chiefdoms and the Myth of the “Mother Culture” Kent V. Flannery and Joyce Marcus Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079 Most scholars agree that the urban states of Classic Mexico developed from Formative chiefdoms which preceded them. They disagree over whether that development (1) took place over the whole area from the Basin of Mexico to Chiapas, or (2) emanated entirely from one unique culture on the Gulf Coast. Recently Diehl and Coe (1996) put forth 11 assertions in defense of the second scenario, which assumes an Olmec “Mother Culture.” This paper disputes those assertions. It suggests that a model for rapid evolution, originally presented by biologist Sewall Wright, provides a better explanation for the explosive development of For- mative Mexican society. © 2000 Academic Press INTRODUCTION to be civilized. Five decades of subsequent excavation have shown the situation to be On occasion, archaeologists revive ideas more complex than that, but old ideas die so anachronistic as to have been declared hard. dead. The most recent attempt came when In “Olmec Archaeology” (hereafter ab- Richard Diehl and Michael Coe (1996) breviated OA), Diehl and Coe (1996:11) parted the icy lips of the Olmec “Mother propose that there are two contrasting Culture” and gave it mouth-to-mouth re- “schools of thought” on the relationship 1 suscitation. between the Olmec and the rest of Me- The notion that the Olmec of the Gulf soamerica.
    [Show full text]
  • Kubler's Sarcophagus
    Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/artm/article-pdf/4/1/3/720689/artm_a_00103.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 KuBler’S SarcophaguS cold War archaeologieS of The olmec periphery luis m. castaÑeda In the fall of 1959, as art historian George Kubler wrote The Art and Architecture of Ancient America (1962), he corresponded with scholars and curators to clarify the spotty provenance of the numerous objects his survey book would discuss. Many of these artifacts had enigmatic histories, few more so than La Venta Monument Six—a sarcophagus carved with zoomorphic imagery excavated at the site of La Venta, in the Mexican state of Tabasco, by American archaeologist Matthew Stirling. Since the late 1930s, Stirling had gained notoriety for rediscov- ering the art of the Olmecs, Mesoamerica’s oldest and then most mys- terious culture, fi rst studied in Mexico in the 1860s. Yet even decades after this rediscovery, most of the artifacts that Stirling examined were not well understood.1 For Kubler, the unique iconography of the sarcophagus excavated in the Olmec “heartland,” especially what he described as its “ideo- graphic notations,” seemed to connect it formally to the art of better- understood regions of Mesoamerica, such as the Maya region. Kubler suggested this despite the lack of conclusive archaeological evidence to 1 Matthew W. Stirling, “Discovering the New World’s Oldest Dated Work of Man,” National Geographic 76, no. 2 (August 1939): 183–218; and Stirling, “Great Stone Faces of the Mexican Jungle,” National Geographic 78, no. 3 (September 1940): 309–34. See also Stirling, Stone Monuments of Southern Mexico (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Offi ce, 1943).
    [Show full text]