DOCSLIB.ORG

Before Roe V. Wade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before Roe V. Wade BEFORE ROE V. WADE Voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Supreme Court’s ruling WITH A NEW AFTERWORD Linda Greenhouse and Reva B. Siegel Yale Law School This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. The authors are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other profes sional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. © 2012 by Linda Greenhouse and Reva B. Siegel This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. Full License available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode You are free to: Share — to copy, distribute and transmit this book. Under the Following Conditions: You must attribute this book to the authors, You may not use this book for commerial purposes, You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. These conditions may be waived by permission of the copyright holders. ISBN: 978-0-615-64821-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................viii Part I: Reform, Repeal, Religion and Reaction ............................1 Introduction ............................................................3 Reform .................................................................7 Letter to the Society for Humane Abortion .............................7 “Rush” Procedure for Going to Japan ..................................8 The Lesser of Two Evils by Sherri Chessen Finkbine ................... 11 Abortion: The Law and the Reality in 1970 by Jane E. Hodgson, M.D. ........................................ 19 Dr. Hodgson’s Affidavit ............................................. 21 Statement of Dr. Hodgson’s Patient .................................. 22 Illegal Abortion as a Public Health Problem by Mary Steichen Calderone ...................................... 22 American Law Institute Abortion Policy, 1962 ........................ 24 American Medical Association Policy Statements, 1967 and 1970 ...... 25 Clergy Consultation Service Statement ............................... 29 Abortion Law Reform in the United States by Jimmye Kimmey ....... 31 “Right to Choose” Memorandum by Jimmye Kimmey ................ 33 Repeal ................................................................ 35 National Organization for Women, Bill of Rights. 36 Abortion: A Woman’s Civil Right by Betty Friedan ................... 38 NARAL Policy Statement ........................................... 40 iv BEFORE ROE V. WADE Call to Women’s Strike for Equality by Betty Friedan ................. 41 “Speak-Out-Rage” .................................................. 45 Feminist as Anti-Abortionist by Sidney Callahan ..................... 46 Black Women’s Manifesto by Frances Beal ............................ 49 Black Women and the Motherhood Myth by Bev Cole ................ 52 Zero Population Growth ............................................ 55 A Sex Counseling Service for College Students by Philip M. Sarrel and Lorna J. Sarrel ............................ 58 Sex and the Yale Student by the Student Committee on Human Sexuality ............................................. 63 Religion ............................................................... 69 Union for Reform Judaism, 1967 ..................................... 69 United Methodist Church, Statement of Social Principles, 1972 ........ 70 Southern Baptist Convention, Resolution on Abortion, 1971 ........... 71 National Association of Evangelicals, Statement on Abortion, 1971 ..... 72 Catholic Church Statement: Humanae Vitae, 1968 .................... 73 Catholic Church Statement: Human Life in Our Day, 1968 ........... 77 Reaction .............................................................. 81 New Jersey Catholic Bishops’ Letter .................................. 81 Abortion in Perspective by Robert M. Byrn ........................... 86 Abortion and Social Justice (Americans United for Life) .............. 88 Similarly, I Will Not...Cause Abortion by Robert D. Knapp, M.D. ..... 94 New Jersey Assembly Testimony ..................................... 97 Handbook on Abortion by J. C. Willke, M.D. and Barbara Willke ..... 99 Abortion Makes Strange Bedfellows: GOP and GOD by Lawrence T. King. .113 Part II: Conflict Constitutionalized: The Years Before Roe .............117 Introduction .........................................................119 Abortion Law Reform and Repeal: Legislative and Judicial Developments by Ruth Roemer ..........................121 TabLE of CONteNTS v Legislation: New York ................................................127 Everywoman’s Abortions: “The Oppressor Is Man” by Susan Brownmiller ...........................................127 Constitutional Question: Is There a Right to Abortion? by Linda Greenhouse ...........................................130 Plaintiffs’ Brief,Abramowicz v. Lefkowitz ............................140 Memorandum of Assemblywoman Constance E. Cook. 147 Plaintiff-Appellant’s Brief,Byrn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation ..................................150 Letter from President Nixon to Cardinal Cooke .....................157 Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller’s Veto Message ......................158 The City Politic: The Case of the Missing Abortion Lobbyists by Hope Spencer ................................................160 Litigation: Connecticut ...............................................163 Women vs. Connecticut Thoughts on Strategy .......................163 Women vs. Connecticut Organizing Pamphlet. 167 Memorandum of Decision, Abele v. Markle I ........................177 Connecticut Legislative Hearing Testimony .........................184 Memorandum of Decision, Abele v. Markle II ........................191 Crosscurrents in the National Arena, 1972 ..............................197 Plaintiff’s Brief,Struck v. Secretary of Defense ........................198 Rockefeller Commission Report ....................................201 Abortion Seen Up to Woman, Doctor by George Gallup .............207 Statement About the Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future .................210 Swing to Right Seen Among Catholics, Jews by Louis Cassels .........212 Assault Book by Patrick Buchanan .................................. 215 Women’s Libbers Do NOT Speak for Us by Phyllis Schlafly .......... 218 Part III: Speaking to the Court. .221 Roe v. Wade in Context ...............................................224 A Changing Landscape ...............................................226 vi BEFORE ROE V. WADE Argument and Decision ...............................................228 Brief for Appellants Jane Roe et al .....................................230 Brief for Appellee Henry Wade ........................................239 Announcing the Decision .............................................245 Afterword ...........................................................253 Before (and After) Roe v. Wade: New Questions About Backlash .........263 I. ABORTION’S MANY MEANINGS: CLAIMS AND FRAMES BEFORE ROE ...................................................270 A. Public Health ...................................................271 B. Environment and Regulation .....................................273 C. Sexual Freedom ..................................................275 D. Feminist Voices ..................................................277 II. CONFLICT BEFORE ROE .........................................281 A. The Catholic Church’s Opposition to Legislative Reform ...........282 B. Party Realignment: Republican Efforts to Recruit Catholic Votes in the 1972 Presidential Campaign .................................286 C. Abortion and Party Realignment .................................300 III. BLAMING ROE: JURICENTRIC AND POLITICAL ACCOUNTS OF CONFLICT ......................................304 A. Claims About Roe ...............................................304 B. Court-Centered and Political Accounts of Conflict: Some Questions ....................................................308 IV. CONCLUSION. 317 Appendix: Briefs Filed by “Friends of the Court” (Amici Curiae) .......319 For Jane Roe: Medical Brief ...........................................319 For Jane Roe: Public Health and Poverty Brief ..........................325 For Jane Roe: “New Women Lawyers” Brief ............................329 For Jane Roe: Planned Parenthood Brief ...............................338 For Jane Roe: Liberal Religious Brief ...................................340 For Jane Roe: California Committee to Legalize Abortion Brief .........342 TabLE of CONteNTS vii For Henry Wade: Americans United for Life Brief ......................348 For Henry Wade: Dissenting Obstetricians’ Brief .......................350 For Henry Wade: National Right to Life Committee Brief ..............353 For Henry Wade: Women’s Brief ......................................360 Acknowledgments ..................................................363 Sources and Suggested Reading ...................................365 Index ..................................................................381 About the Authors ..................................................391 FOREWORD This book’s purpose is to recapture a time that is rapidly fading from memory. During the years before January 22, 1973, the day on which the Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade and proclaimed that the Constitution protected a woman’s right
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Personhood Seeking New Life with Republican Control Jonathan Will Mississippi College School of Law, [email protected]
    Mississippi College School of Law MC Law Digital Commons Journal Articles Faculty Publications 2018 Personhood Seeking New Life with Republican Control Jonathan Will Mississippi College School of Law, [email protected] I. Glenn Cohen Harvard Law School, [email protected] Eli Y. Adashi Brown University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.law.mc.edu/faculty-journals Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons Recommended Citation 93 Ind. L. J. 499 (2018). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at MC Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of MC Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Personhood Seeking New Life with Republican Control* JONATHAN F. WILL, JD, MA, 1. GLENN COHEN, JD & ELI Y. ADASHI, MD, MSt Just three days prior to the inaugurationof DonaldJ. Trump as President of the United States, Representative Jody B. Hice (R-GA) introducedthe Sanctity of Human Life Act (H R. 586), which, if enacted, would provide that the rights associatedwith legal personhood begin at fertilization. Then, in October 2017, the Department of Health and Human Services releasedits draft strategicplan, which identifies a core policy of protectingAmericans at every stage of life, beginning at conception. While often touted as a means to outlaw abortion, protecting the "lives" of single-celled zygotes may also have implicationsfor the practice of reproductive medicine and research Indeedt such personhoodefforts stand apart anddistinct from more incre- mental attempts to restrictabortion that target the abortionprocedure and those who would perform it.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion for Preliminary Injunction
    CASE 0:20-cv-01037-PJS-DTS Document 9 Filed 05/03/20 Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA FOURTH DIVISION AALFA Family Clinic, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 0:20-cv-01037-PJS-DTS v. Tim Walz, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION The Governor of Minnesota has issued an executive order that prohibits all “non- essential or elective surgeries and procedures” that use personal protective equipment (PPE). See Executive Order 20-9 (attached as Exhibit 2). The governor has also issued stay-at-home orders that prohibit Minnesotans from exercising their constitutional rights to attend church and peaceably assemble in an effort to maintain social distanc- ing. See Executive Order 20-20 (attached as Exhibit 4); Executive Order 20-33 (attached as Exhibit 5); Executive Order 20-48 (attached as Exhibit 6). But the state’s officials are refusing to enforce these orders against abortion pro- viders. The Minnesota Department of Health has given abortion providers free rein to continue using PPE on elective abortions, even though other elective procedures have been suspended to conserve PPE for life-saving or essential health care during this time of worldwide shortage. See Torey Van Oot, Minnesota Providers Can Continue Abor- tion, Drawing Criticism From Some, Star Tribune (March 31, 2020), available at http://strib.mn/3cfFnJP (attached as Exhibit 3). The state’s officials are even allowing abortion patients to demand an elective surgical abortion—which consumes more PPE brief in support of motion for preliminary injunction Page 1 of 21 CASE 0:20-cv-01037-PJS-DTS Document 9 Filed 05/03/20 Page 2 of 21 than a medication abortion1—even when medication abortion could be used to achieve the same result.
    [Show full text]
  • TA(2020)0336 Abortion Rights in Poland European Parliament Resolution of 26 November 2020 on the De Facto Ban on the Right to Abortion in Poland (2020/2876(RSP))
    European Parliament 2019-2024 TEXTS ADOPTED P9_TA(2020)0336 Abortion rights in Poland European Parliament resolution of 26 November 2020 on the de facto ban on the right to abortion in Poland (2020/2876(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), and in particular Articles 2 and 7(1) thereof, – having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) of 4 November 1950 and the related case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), – having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), – having regard to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, – having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948, – having regard to the UN International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) of 16 December 1966 and the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) of 16 December 1966, – having regard to the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women of 18 December 1979, – having regard to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984, – having regard to the UN Human Rights Committee’s concluding observations of 23 November 2016 on the seventh periodic report of Poland, – having regard to UNESCO’s International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education of 10 January 2018, – having regard to the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) held in Cairo in 1994, its programme of
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Family Issues
    Journal of Family Issues http://jfi.sagepub.com/ Marriage, Abortion, or Unwed Motherhood? How Women Evaluate Alternative Solutions to Premarital Pregnancies in Japan and the United States Ekaterina Hertog and Miho Iwasawa Journal of Family Issues published online 5 June 2011 DOI: 10.1177/0192513X11409333 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jfi.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/06/03/0192513X11409333 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Journal of Family Issues can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jfi.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jfi.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Proof - Jun 5, 2011 What is This? Downloaded from jfi.sagepub.com at Oxford University Libraries on October 29, 2011 JFIXXX10.1177/0192513X11409333 409333Hertog and IwasawaJournal of Family Issues © The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Journal of Family Issues XX(X) 1 –26 Marriage, Abortion, © The Author(s) 2011 Reprints and permission: http://www. or Unwed Motherhood? sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0192513X11409333 How Women Evaluate http://jfi.sagepub.com Alternative Solutions to Premarital Pregnancies in Japan and the United States Ekaterina Hertog1 and Miho Iwasawa2 Abstract In this article, the authors argue that to understand the very low incidence of outside-of-marriage childbearing in contemporary Japan one needs to take into account perceptions of all possible solutions to a premarital pregnancy: marriage, abortion, and childbearing outside wedlock. To demonstrate the particular impact of these perceptions in Japan, the authors compare them with those in the United States, a country where many more children are born outside wedlock.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 19-1392 In The Supreme Court of the United States THOMAS E. DOBBS, M.D., M.P.H., STATE HEALTH OFFICER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL., Petitioners, v. JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit AMICUS BRIEF OF THE ELLIOT INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS THOMAS P. MONAGHAN JAY ALAN SEKULOW CECILIA NOLAND-HEIL Counsel of Record FRANCIS J. MANION STUART J. ROTH GEOFFREY R. SURTEES COLBY M. MAY AMERICAN CENTER FOR WALTER M. WEBER LAW & JUSTICE LAURA HERNANDEZ 1000 Regent University AMERICAN CENTER FOR Drive LAW & JUSTICE Virginia Beach, VA 23464 201 Maryland Ave., N.E. (757) 226-2489 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-8890 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED..................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................iv INTEREST OF AMICUS...................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT................... 1 ARGUMENT................................ 2 I. ABORTION IS A POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS PROCEDURE................3 A. Ambulance calls........................ 3 B. Maternal abortion deaths................ 5 II. THE CLAIM THAT ABORTION IS SAFER THAN CHILDBIRTH IS NOT SUPPORTED AND MOST LIKELY FALSE ............... 7 A. Relevance to abortion jurisprudence........ 7 B. Repetition of the fiction.................. 8 C. Refutation of the fiction and possible backpedaling.......................... 10 D. Dissecting the fiction................... 12 E. Response to contrary statements in Whole Woman's Health ....................... 19 III. PUBLISHED LITERATURE INDICATES THAT ABORTION IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN CONTINUED PREGNANCY......... 21 iii CONCLUSION..............................26 APPENDIX A: Correspondence with HHS/CDC . 1a APPENDIX B: Documented ambulance calls 2009-21 ............................... 10a iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES City of Akron v.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movement Studies Framing Faith
    This article was downloaded by: [Florida State University Libraries] On: 25 January 2010 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 789349894] Publisher Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37- 41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Social Movement Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713446651 Framing Faith: Explaining Cooperation and Conflict in the US Conservative Christian Political Movement Deana A. Rohlinger a; Jill Quadagno a a Department of Sociology, Florida State University, Florida, USA To cite this Article Rohlinger, Deana A. and Quadagno, Jill(2009) 'Framing Faith: Explaining Cooperation and Conflict in the US Conservative Christian Political Movement', Social Movement Studies, 8: 4, 341 — 358 To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/14742830903234239 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742830903234239 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between the Pro-Choice and Pro-Life Social Movements Outside the Abortion Clinic Sophie Deixel Vassar College
    Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects 2018 Whose body, whose choice: interactions between the pro-choice and pro-life social movements outside the abortion clinic Sophie Deixel Vassar College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Deixel, Sophie, "Whose body, whose choice: interactions between the pro-choice and pro-life social movements outside the abortion clinic" (2018). Senior Capstone Projects. 786. https://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone/786 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @ Vassar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Window @ Vassar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vassar College Whose Body, Whose Choice: Interactions Between the Pro-Choice and Pro-Life Social Movements Outside the Abortion Clinic A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Bachelor of Arts in Sociology By Sophie Deixel Thesis Advisors: Professor Bill Hoynes Professor Erendira Rueda May 2018 Deixel Whose Body Whose Choice: Interactions Between the Pro-Choice and Pro-Life Social Movements Outside the Abortion Clinic This project explores abortion discourse in the United States, looking specifically at the site of the abortion clinic as a space of interaction between the pro-choice and pro-life social movements. In order to access this space, I completed four months of participant observation in the fall of 2017 as a clinic escort at the Planned Parenthood clinic in Poughkeepsie, New York. I thus was able to witness (and participate in) firsthand the interactions between the clinic escorts and the anti-abortion protestors who picketed outside of the clinic each week.
    [Show full text]
  • Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics
    Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics EJAIB Vol. 24 (5) September 2014 www.eubios.info ISSN 1173-2571 Official Journal of the Asian Bioethics Association (ABA) Copyright ©2014 Eubios Ethics Institute (All rights reserved, for commercial reproductions). Contents page Editorial: Wisdom for our Future Editorial: Wisdom for our Future 137 A theme of the seven papers in this issue is wisdom - Darryl Macer for a sustainable future. How can we teach students Doubt the Analects: An educational session using about bioethics? Asai et al explore the use of the the Analects in medical ethics in Japan 138 Analects of Confucius with quite positive results in - Atsushi Asai, Yasuhiro Kadooka, Sakiko Masaki Japan. Many words of wisdom are found in ancient The Issue of Abortion and Mother- Fetus Relations: literature, which has often survived the test of time A study from Buddhist perspectives 142 because of its utility to humankind’s moral development - Tejasha Kalita and Archana Barua and social futures. Rafique presents the results of a Perspectives of Euthanasia from Terminally Ill Patients: survey of what issues medical students in Pakistan A Philosophical Perspective 146 consider to be ethical. There are some interesting - Deepa P. issues for the way that we teach, and both approaches Islamic Perceptions of Medication with Special can be used in bioethics education. Reference to Ordinary and Extraordinary Means Catherine van Zeeland presents a review of the of Medical Treatment 149 many actors in the Hague, the city of International Law, - Mohammad Manzoor Malik that influence international environmental law. The Roles of The Hague as a Centre for International Law initial paper was presented at the first AUSN overcoming environmental challenges 156 Conference to be held in London late 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Toolkit: Telemedicine for Medication Abortion and Abortion-Related Services in the United States
    Resource toolkit: Telemedicine for medication abortion and abortion-related services in the United States In order to expand access to high-quality abortion care, some health care providers in the United States employ technology to provide medication abortion or abortion-related services via telemedicine. As these services have expanded, evaluations over the last decade have provided evidence on their implementation, use, and impact. This toolkit highlights what is known about telemedicine provision of abortion and abortion-related services to date. We highlight findings across four domains: safety and effectiveness, acceptability/satisfaction, access, and experiences. Additionally, we include commentaries, overviews, and a telemedicine for medication abortion implementation guide. Publications that report findings in multiple domains are repeated in each relevant section. Safety and effectiveness The in-clinic telemedicine for medication abortion model has been shown to be safe and effective; severe complications are extremely rare, and only 1-5% of patients require an aspiration procedure to complete the abortion. Similarly, direct-to-patient telemedicine for medication abortion models have been found to be effective: 93% of patients complete their abortion. Title Authors Citation Telehealth interventions to DeNicola N, Grossman D, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; improve obstetric and Marko K, Sonalkar S, Butler 135(2): 371-38 gynecologic health outcomes: Tobah Y, Ganju N, Witkop C, A systematic review Henderson JT, Butler JL, Lowery C Medication abortion provided Kohn J, Snow J, Simons H, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; through telemedicine in four Seymour J, Thompson TA, 134(2):343-350 US states Grossman D TelAbortion: Evaluation of a Raymond E, Chong E, Winikoff Contraception.
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential and Legal Access to Abortion and Contraception, 1960-2019
    Confidential and legal access to abortion and contraception, 1960-2019 Caitlin Knowles Myers* March 2021 Abstract An expansive empirical literature estimates the causal effects of policies governing young women’s confidential and legal access to contraception and abortion. I present a new review of changes in the historical policy environment that serve as the foundation of this work. I consult primary sources including annotated statutes, judicial rulings, attorney general opinions, and advisory articles in medical journals, as well as secondary sources including newspaper articles and snapshots of various policy environments prepared by scholars, advocates, and government organizations. Based on this review, I provide a suggested coding of the policy environment from 1960 to present. I also present and compare the legal coding schemes used in the empirical literature and where possible I resolve numerous and substantial discrepancies. * John G. McCullough Professor of Economics at Middlebury College and Research Fellow, IZA. I am grateful to Martha Bailey, Randall Cragun, Melanie Guldi, Theodore Joyce, and Joseph Sabia for helpful and insightful conversations on the legal coding. I additionally wish to thank Birgitta Cheng, Kathryn Haderlein and Madeleine Niemi for expert research assistance. Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 2 Overview of the policy environment .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of the Global Gag Rule on Democratic Participation and Political Advocacy in Peru, 31 Brook
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Brooklyn Law School: BrooklynWorks Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 31 | Issue 3 Article 8 2006 The olitP ics of Gagging: The ffecE ts of the Global Gag Rule on Democratic Participation and Political Advocacy in Peru Rachael E. Seevers Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Rachael E. Seevers, The Politics of Gagging: The Effects of the Global Gag Rule on Democratic Participation and Political Advocacy in Peru, 31 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2006). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol31/iss3/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. THE POLITICS OF GAGGING: THE EFFECTS OF THE GLOBAL GAG RULE ON DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION AND POLITICAL ADVOCACY IN PERU I. INTRODUCTION he United States is one of the world’s largest donor countries to Tglobal family planning activities.1 The majority of its international grants to foreign providers come under the auspices of United States Aid for International Development (USAID) grants, making the United States an important player in global family planning.2 The 2001 reinstatement of the historically controversial “Mexico City Policy” attaches wide ranging aid conditionalities to the receipt of USAID funding, and effec- tively enables the United States to dictate the domestic and international family planning policies of recipient countries.3 Many of these funding restrictions relate to the provision of abortion services and counseling.4 In addition, some of the policy’s provisions are aimed at curtailing politi- cal advocacy for liberalized abortion regulation by foreign recipient non- governmental organizations (NGOs).5 The restrictions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion at Or Over 20 Weeks' Gestation
    Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Matthew B. Barry, Coordinator Section Research Manager April 30, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45161 Abortion At or Over 20 Weeks’ Gestation: Frequently Asked Questions Summary Legislation at the federal and state levels seeking to limit or ban abortions in midpregnancy has focused attention on the procedure and the relatively small number of women who choose to undergo such an abortion. According to the Guttmacher Institute, about 926,200 abortions were performed in 2014; 1.3% of abortions were performed at or over 21 weeks’ gestation in 2013. A 2018 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study found that most women who have abortions are unmarried (86%), are poor or low-income (75%), are under age 30 (72%), and are women of color (61%). Stages of Pregnancy and Abortion Procedures A typical, full-term pregnancy spans 40 weeks, separated into trimesters: first trimester (week 1 through week 13), second trimester (week 14 through week 27), and third trimester (week 28 through birth). Abortion in the second trimester can be performed either by using a surgical procedure or by using drugs to induce labor. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2014 a surgical method was used for 98.8% of U.S. abortions at 14-15 weeks’ gestation, 98.4% at 16-17 weeks, 96.6% at 18-20 weeks, and 90.2% at 21 weeks or later. Proposed Legislation Related to Abortion Legislation in the 115th Congress, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (H.R.
    [Show full text]