DOCSLIB.ORG

World Bank Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Bank Document Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 32428-UA PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON Public Disclosure Authorized A PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$106 MILLION TO UKRAINE FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized HYDROPOWER REHABILITATION PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF THE ENERGY SECTOR REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT PROGW May 24,2005 Infrastructure and Energy Sector Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized This document has restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective March 3 1,2005) Currency Unit = Ukraine (UAH) UAHl = US$0.19 US$1 = UAH5.28 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS APL Adaptable Program Loan BCM Billion Cubic Meters CAS Country Assistance Strategy CEE Central and Eastem Europe CF Carbon Financing CIDA Canadian Agency for Intemational Development co2 Carbon Dioxide ccu Coal Company ofUkraine DPL Development Policy Loan EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC European Commission ECU Energy Company of Ukraine ERR Economic Intemal Rate of Retum EMP Environmental Management Plan EU European Union FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Retum G7 Group of Seven GDP Gross Domestic Product GHG Greenhouse Gas GWh Gigawatt-hour HPP Hydropower Plant IMF International Monetary Fund JI Joint Implementation KfW Bank for Reconstruction (Germany) KP Kyoto Protocol MFE Ministry of Fuel and Energy MIS Management Information System MW Megawatt NERC National Electricity Regulatory Commission NOx Nitrogen Oxide NPV Net Present Value OP Operational Policy PAL Programmatic Adjustment Loan PHRD Japanese Aid Agency PrU Project Implementation Unit PPIAF Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PWG Permanent Working Group SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Sida Swedish Agency for Intemational Development SIL Specific Investment Loan so2 Sulphur Dioxide TACIS European Commission’s Agency for Technical Assistance to the CIS Countries TEN-E Trans-European Electricity Networks TPP Thermal Power Plant TSO Transmission System Operator UCTE Union for the Coordination of Transmission of Electricity in Europe UHE UkrHydroEnergo USAID United States Agency for Intemational Development WEM Wholesale Electricity Market WTO World Trade Organization Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Paul Bermingham Sector Manager: Peter Thomson Task Team Leader: Dejan Ostojic This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not be otherwise disclosed without World Bank authorization. EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Hydropower Rehabilitation Project in Support of the Energy Sector Reform and Development Program CONTENTS Page A . STRATEGIC CONTEXT AND RATIONALE ................................................................. 1 1. Country and sector issues .................................................................................................... 1 2 . Rationale for Bank involvement ......................................................................................... 3 3 . Higher level objectives to which the project contributes .................................................... 4 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 5 1. Lending instrument ............................................................................................................. 5 2 . Program objective and phases ............................................................................................. 6 3 . Project development objective and key indicators .............................................................. 7 4 . Project components ............................................................................................................. 8 5 . Lessons leamed and reflected in the project design ............................................................ 9 6 . Alternatives considered and reasons for rejection ............................................................ 10 C . IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................................ 11 1. Partnership arrangements .................................................................................................. 11 2 . Institutional and implementation arrangements ................................................................ 12 3 . Monitoring and evaluation ofoutcomeshesults ................................................................ 13 ... 4 . Sustainability..................................................................................................................... 13 5 . Critical risks and possible controversial aspects ............................................................... 14 6 . Loan conditions and covenants ......................................................................................... 16 D. APPRAISAL SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 17 1. Economic and financial analyses ...................................................................................... 17 2 . Technical ........................................................................................................................... 19 3 . Fiduciary ........................................................................................................................... 20 4 . Social................................................................................................................................. 21 5 . Environment...................................................................................................................... 22 6 . Safeguard policies ............................................................................................................. 23 7 . Policy Exceptions and Readiness ...................................................................................... 24 Annex 1: Country. Sector and Program Background............................................................. 25 Annex 2: Major Related Projects Financed by the Bank and other Agencies ...................... 39 Annex 3: Results Framework and Monitoring ........................................................................ 43 Annex 4: Detailed Project Description...................................................................................... 45 Annex 5: Project Costs ............................................................................................................... 51 Annex 6: Implementation Arrangements ................................................................................. 53 Annex 7: Financial Management and Disbursement Arrangements ..................................... 59 Annex 8: Procurement Arrangements ...................................................................................... 65 Annex 9: Economic and Financial Analysis ............................................................................. 72 Annex 10: Safeguard Policy Issues ............................................................................................ 93 Annex 12: Documents in the Project Files .............................................................................. 102 Annex 13: Statement of Loans and Credits ............................................................................ 103 Annex 14: Country at a Glance ........................................................................ 105 Map IBRD 34052 UKRAINE HYDROPOWER REHABILITATION PROJECT IN SUPPORT OF THE ENERGY SECTOR REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA ECSIE Date: May 25,2005 Team Leader: Dejan R. Ostojic Country Director: Paul Bermingham Sectors: Power (1 00%) Sector ManagerDirector: Peter Thomson Themes: Regional integration (P);Regulation and competition policy (P) Project ID: PO83702 Environmental screening category: Partial Assessment Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Safeguard screening category: Limited impact W' ' Project Financing Data [XI Loan [ ]Credit [ ]Grant [ ]Guarantee [ ]Other: For Loans/Credits/Others: Total Bank financing (US$m.): 106.00 Pronosed terms: VSL RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT Total: 261.80 112.70 374.50 Borrower: Ukraine Responsible Agency: UkrHydroEnergo 07300 Vyshhorod Kyiv Region Ukraine Annual 0.0 7.0 27.0 32.0 17.0 12.0 7.0 4.0 Cumulative 0.0 7.0 34.0 66.0 83.0 95.0 102.0 106.0 Project implementation period: Start: October 1,2005 End: December 3 1,201 1 Expected effectiveness date: September 30,2005 Expected closing date: June 30,2012 Does the project depart from the CAS in content or other significant respects? [ ]Yes [ XI No Re$ PAD A.3 Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies? Re$ PAD D. 7 [XIYes [ ]No Have these been approved by Bank management? [XIYes [ ]No Is approval for any policy exception sought from the Board? [ ]Yes [XINO Does the project include any critical risks rated “substantial” or “high”? [XIYes [ ]No Re$ PAD C.5 Does the project meet the Regional criteria for readiness for implementation? [XIYes [ ]No Ref: PAD D. 7 Project development objective Ref: PAD B.2, Technical Annex 3 and, therefore, facilitate unimpeded operation of the energy market, both domestically and internationally. The main
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropogenic Transformation of Hydrological Regime of the Dnieper River
    Manuscript Number: 2701 Indian Journal of Ecology (2018) 45(3): 445-453 NAAS Rating: 4.96 Anthropogenic Transformation of Hydrological Regime of The Dnieper River Vitalii Ivanovich Pichura, Daria Sergeevna Malchykova1, Pavel Aleksandrovich Ukrainskij2, Iryna Aleksandrovna Shakhman and Anastasiia Nikolaevna Bystriantseva1 Kherson State Agricultural University, Ukraine, 73006, Kherson, Stritens'ka str. 23, 1Kherson State University, Ukraine, 7300 0, Kherson, Universitets'ka str. 27, 2Belgorod State National Research University, Russian Federation, 308015, Belgorod, 85 Pobedy Str. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Problems of rational water use and water quality assessment are the priorities of many states, especially in the basins of transboundary rivers. Creation and functioning of the cascade of Dnieper reservoirs led to a radical transformation of the hydrological regime of the Dnieper River. As a result, there occurred a significant deterioration of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of surface water quality, increase of its trophic state, reduction of the efficiency and stability of the aquatic ecosystem of the Dnieper basin, which is largely determined by anthropogenic factors. As a result of interpretation the series of space images (August, 1986-2016) of the satellites Landsat- 5, Landsat- 7 and Landsat-8 with a spatial resolution of 30 meters, the spatio-temporal trend of changes in physical (water transparency), hydrochemical (general phosphorus concentration in water), biological (chlorophyll-a) properties of water areas of reservoirs was determined. In studies trophic state index developed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection was used to classify all types of water surface, including rivers. It is established that the value of trophic state index in reservoirs is distributed unevenly from 26.5 to 56.5.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESERVING the DNIPRO RIVER Harmony, History and Rehabilitation PRESERVING the DNIPRO RIVER
    PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation International Dnipro Fund, Kiev, Ukraine, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, National Research Institute of Environment and Resources of Ukraine PRESERVING THE DNIPRO RIVER harmony, history and rehabilitation Vasyl Yakovych Shevchuk Georgiy Oleksiyovich Bilyavsky Vasyl M ykolayovych Navrotsky Oleksandr Oleksandrovych Mazurkevich Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Preserving the Dnipro River / V.Y. Schevchuk ... [et al.]. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-88962-827-0 1. Water quality management--Dnieper River. 2. Dnieper River--Environmental conditions. I. Schevchuk, V. Y. QH77.U38P73 2004 333.91'62153'09477 C2004-906230-1 No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in a review. Publishing by Mosaic Press, offices and warehouse at 1252 Speers Rd., units 1 & 2, Oakville, On L6L 5N9, Canada and Mosaic Press, PMB 145, 4500 Witmer Industrial Estates, Niagara Falls, NY, 14305-1386, U.S.A. and International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500 Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9/Centre de recherches pour le développement international BP 8500 Ottawa, ON K1G 3H9 (pub@ idrc.ca / www.idrc.ca)
    [Show full text]
  • Chernobyl Heritage and the E40 Trans-Europe Waterway
    2020 Chernobyl heritage and the E40 trans-Europe waterway Study commissioned by the Frankfurt Zoological Society January 2020 ACRO | 138 rue de l’Eglise – 14200 Hérouville St Clair – France | (+33) 2 31 94 35 34 | acro.eu.org | [email protected] ACRO – Chernobyl heritage and the E40 trans-Europe waterway TERMS OF REFERENCE Objectives Radioactive contamination analysis Organisation Frankfurt Zoological Society Offer PR190521(01)-SZF-v1 ANALYSIS Association pour le Contrôle de la Radioactivité dans l’Ouest 138, rue de l’Eglise 14200 Hérouville Saint-Clair France www.acro.eu.org phone: +33 (0) 2.31.94.35.34 / email: [email protected] SIRET 950 369 868 00027 | APE 7120 B Authors David Boilley, Ala Pigrée, and Pierre Barbey Cover picture Pripyat river © Olga Kaskevich DOCUMENT Publication date January 2020 Identification RAP_E40_en Version 01 Pages 46 pages Title Chernobyl heritage and the E40 trans-Europe waterway CONDITIONS From ACRO: Reproduction of the document is authorized only in the form of a complete facsimile. 2 ACRO – Chernobyl heritage and the E40 trans-Europe waterway Summary The E40 waterway aims to connect the Black Sea to the Baltic Sea, via the Dniepr and Prypiat rivers. But, the whole Dnieper watershed is contaminated by 1986 Chernobyl accident. Furthermore, the Prypiat crosses the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone and passes immediately next to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The present study aims to give a first evaluation of the radiologic impact of the construction and maintenance of the E40. The two important radioelements from a public health perspective are cesium-137 and strontium-90.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Reviews Ukraine
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS UKRAINE UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 1999 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 6 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.00.II-E.1 ISBN 92-1-116743-4 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Preface The Environmental Performance Review of Ukraine started with its preparatory mission in November 1997. This mission resulted in the agreed structure of the review. The team carrying out the review consisted of national and international experts. The national team members were made available by Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands and Switzerland. Technical advisers from Germany (on water protection technology) and Italy (on air pollution abatement, waste treatment and measurement technologies) assisted the team in their areas of competence. The Rome Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, UNEP and the ECE secretariat provided the international experts. The costs of participation of experts from countries in transition, as well as the travel expenses of the ECE secretariat, were covered from extrabudgetary funds provided by France, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. the BASE CASE ALTERNATIVE As Noted in Section 1, EBRD
    Tacis Nuclear Safety Environmental Impact Assessment for Khmelnitsky 2 NPP 10. THE BASE CASE ALTERNATIVE As noted in Section 1, EBRD environmental procedures require a comparison of impacts from the proposed project, i.e. completion and upgrading of R4/K2 and closure of the Chornobyl NPP, with the base case, i.e. the current situation with Chornobyl Unit 3 in operation and the possibility of both Units 2 and 3 operating. This Section provides a brief introduction to the state of the power industry in Ukraine in the last few years (Section 10.1) as a prelude to a discussion of such a comparison (Section 10.2). 10.1 Power generation and the nuclear contribution 1991-1995 Ukraine became independent in 1991 and immediately experienced a severe recession. Gross domestic product (GDP) fell from the equivalent of US$ 155.6 billion in 1990 to US$ 68.8 billion in 1995 (both at 1990 prices), a large balance of payments deficit developed (US$ 1.2 billion in 1995) and inflation became rampant [10.1]. Primary energy consumption mirrored the slump in the economy by dropping rapidly from 1991 to 1995 (Table 10.1). Ukraine has a once-large but declining coal industry. In addition to the decline in production (from 131 Mt in 1991 to 66 Mt in 1995) the quality of the coal being mined also declined. The country became a net importer of coal in 1992 and relies heavily on imported oil and gas from Russia (e.g. 66 billion m3 of gas and 13 Mt of oil from Russia and Turkmenistan in 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Climate Changes on the Aquatic System Chemistry in the Kyiv Reservoir and the Desna River (Ukraine)
    EGU2020-9677 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-9677 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The impact of climate changes on the aquatic system chemistry in the Kyiv Reservoir and the Desna river (Ukraine) Valeriy Osypov, Volodymyr Osadchyi, Natalia Osadcha, Olha Ukhan, and Nina Mostova Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute, Hydrochemistry, Kyiv, Ukraine ([email protected]) The Kyiv Reservoir and the Desna river are the main sources of drinking water supply for Kyiv, the capital of Ukraine. The impact of surface air temperature on the change of the aquatic system chemistry mentioned above water objects was studied based on long-term regular observations (1995–2018). The findings are based on the analysis of daily air and water temperature, water pH, oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations, water color index, dissolved organic substances (CODMn), Fe, Mn, and phytoplankton abundance (without identifying their species composition). The winter period. Despite different hydraulic conditions in the Kyiv Reservoir and in the Desna river, the lack of ice cover due to an increase in winter air temperatures (December-February) led to significant improvement of the water oxygen regime in recent years. This fact, as well as the subsequent chain of changes in the water chemistry, contributed to the cheaper drinking water supply. The ratio of the oxygen content change to the duration of the ice cover, determined by air temperature, was obtained. This allowed us to reconstruct years with observed hypoxia phenomena since 1850. Changes in the water chemistry, triggered by oxygen deficit, were described.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Draft River Basin Management Plan for Dnipro River Basin in Ukraine: Phase 1, Step 1 – Description of the Characteristics of the River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 DEVELOPMENT OF DRAFT RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DNIPRO RIVER BASIN IN UKRAINE: PHASE 1, STEP 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RIVER BASIN Report February 2019 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Ms Josiane Mongellaz, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) EUWI+ country representative in Ukraine Ms Oksana Konovalenko Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Philippe Seguin, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) Authors Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Mr Yurii Nabyvanets Ms Nataliia Osadcha Mr Vasyl Hrebin Ms Yevheniia Vasylenko Ms Olha Koshkina Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document “Assessment of the needs and identification of priorities in implementation of the River Basin Management Plans in Ukraine”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful-2-1-2018-0003-Vasilenko
    Volume 2, Issue 1, 2018 https://useful.academy ISSN 2574-4461 (online) Publisher: SVP4U-KYIV-1-FUND LLC DOI: https://doi.org/10.32557/useful Qualitative analysis of water supply of the city of Kyiv Lesya Vasilenko Ph.D. a, Olena Zhukova Ph.D. b, Julia Bereznitska Ph.D. c a Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Address: 03037, Povitroflotsky Avenue, 31, Kyiv, Ukraine P: +38 (093) 543-2684, E: [email protected] b Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Address: 03037, Povitroflotsky Avenue, 31, Kyiv, Ukraine P: +38 (096) 875-2104, E: [email protected] с Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Address: 03037, Povitroflotsky Avenue, 31, Kyiv, Ukraine P: +38 (044) 241-54-91, E: [email protected] ORCID iDs a https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-5481 b https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-9996 c https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7953-3974 ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received March 10, 2018; Accepted March 18, 2018 Available online March 20, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32557/useful-2-1-2018-0003 License: Under a creative commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Original language: Ukrainian Keywords: qualitative depletion, quantitative depletion, environment, nature management, water pollution index, ecological index. Please cite as: Lesya Vasilenko Ph.D, Olena Zhukova Ph.D, Julia Bereznitska Ph.D. Qualitative analysis of water supply of the city of Kyiv USEFUL online journal 2018; 2(1) URL: https://useful.academy/ ISSN 2574-4461 (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.32557/useful-2-1-2018-0003 Lesya Vasilenko Ph.D, Olena Zhukova Ph.D, Julia Bereznitska Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Peculiarities of Zooplankton Cenosis
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2021, 11(6), 63-68, doi: 10.15421/2021_224 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Peculiarities of zooplankton cenosis structure and Ukrainian Journal of Ecology,2021, 11(4),,doi: 10.15421/2021_ development in the middle water area of Kremenchuk Reservoir, Dnieper River (Ukraine), in conditions of elevated temperatures N.Ya. Rudyk-Leuska1*, M.I. Khyzhniak1, M.V. Leuskyi1, N.Yu. Yevtushenko1, V.M. Kondratіuk1, R.V. Kononenko1, N.I. Tson1 1National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Heroiv Oborony Str., 15, Kyiv, 03041 Ukraine *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 20.07.2021. Accepted: 31.07.2021. An analysis of the research results on the quantitative and qualitative composition of zooplankton in the middle part of the Kremenchuk reservoir in the water area near Chervona Sloboda, Lesky, and Khudyaki in August 2016 is presented аt elevated temperatures. Of particular note is the first decade of the month, when there was a shift in maximum temperature to +25.42 ± 0.15°C (Cv=1.86%). In general, the water temperature was unstable; its maximum values were a stress factor for plankton invertebrates of the reservoir. It is established that for each section of the water area, certain specific Rotifera species are characteristic of zooplankton: Hexarthra mira (Hudson, 1871)–at station 1; Lepadella patella (O.F. Muller, 1786), Mytilina mucronata (Müller, 1773), Brachionus forficula Wierzejski, 1891, Br. budapestinensis (Daday, 1885)–at station 2; Polyarthra euryptera (Carlin 1943; Bartos 1950; Nipkow 1952; Sudzuki 1964), Lecane luna (Müller, 1776), Synchaeta monopus (Plate, 1889), Asplanchna priodonta var.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report: Description of the Characteristics of Dnipro River Basin
    European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+): Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 TECHNICAL REPORT: DESCRIPTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF DNIPRO RIVER BASIN. SUMMARY Version 2.0 - January 2020 Responsible EU member state consortium project leader Ms Josiane Mongellaz, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) EUWI+ country representative in Ukraine Ms Oksana Konovalenko Responsible international thematic lead expert Mr Philippe Seguin, Office International de l’Eau/International Office for Water (FR) Responsible Ukrainian thematic lead experts Mr Oleksandr Bon, Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resourcesof Ukraine Mr Mykhailo Khoriev, State Agency of Water Resources Mr Valerii Babchuk, State Agency of Water Resources Authors Ms Yevheniia Vasylenko (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) Ms Olha Koshkina (Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Institute of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine and National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+ 4 EaP) is implemented by the UNECE, OECD, responsible for the implementation of Result 1 and an EU member state consortium of Austria, managed by the lead coordinator Umweltbundesamt, and of France, managed by the International Office for Water, responsible for the implementation of Result 2 and 3. This document, the “TECHNICAL REPORT: DESCRIPTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF DNIPRO RIVER BASIN. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY”, was produced by the EU member state consortium with the finan- cial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the offi- cial opinion of the European Union or the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Side Approach to the Realities of the Chernobyl NPP Accident - Summing-Up of the Consequences of the Accident Twenty Years After (II)
    Multi-side Approach to the Realities of the Chernobyl NPP Accident - Summing-up of the Consequences of the Accident Twenty Years After (II) - Report of a research grant from the Toyota Foundation (November 2004 – October 2006) Project leader Imanaka T. May 2008 チェルノブイリ原発事故の実相解明への多角的アプローチ － 20 年を機会とする事故被害のまとめ(II) － トヨタ財団助成研究 （2004 年 11 月～2006 年 10 月） 研究報告書（英語版） 研究代表者 今中哲二 200８年５月 Preface This is the English version report of the international collaboration study, “Multi-side Approach to the Realities of the Chernobyl NPP Accident: Summing-up of the Consequences of the Accident Twenty Years” which was carried out in November 2004 – October 2006 supported by a research grant from the Toyota Foundation. Twenty three articles by authors of various professions are included about Chernobyl. The Japanese version was already published in August 2007, which contains 24 articles. (http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/tyt2004/CherTYT2004.htm) Out of them, 12 articles are included in both versions. As a specialist of nuclear engineering, I have been investigating the Chernobyl accident since its beginning. Before the 20th anniversary of Chernobyl, I hoped to start a new project to try to make an overview of “Chernobyl disaster” by collecting various viewpoints of persons who have been involved in Chernobyl in their own ways: scientists, journalists, NGO activists, sufferers etc. I thought that a new image of Chernobyl could be constructed through learning different viewpoints. Fortunately the Toyota Foundation supported my proposal. I think we could make a unique report about Chernobyl. In addition to this report, the following two reports were already published through the previous collaborations: ¾ Research Activities about the Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl NPS Accident and Social Activities to Assist the Sufferers by the Accident.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear and Radiation Safety in Ukraine Annual Report 2002
    STATE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMITTEE OF UKRAINE Nuclear and Radiation Safety in Ukraine Annual Report 2002 KYIV – 2003 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ABDBA - Analysis of Beyond Design Basis Accidents ADBA - Analysis of Design Basis Accidents AWT - Active Water Treatment CF - Capacity Factor ChNPP - Chornobyl NPP CMU - Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine CPS - Control and Protection System CR - Control Rods DE - Deep Evaporator ECCS - Emergency Core Cooling System ER - Exposure Rate FCM - Fuel Containing Materials FE - Fuel Element FS - Feasibility Study GICS - Group and Individual Control System IAEA - International Atomic Energy Agency IACS - Integrated Automated Control System IMS - In-core Monitoring System RF - Reference Specimen IRC - Ionising Radiation Source KhNPP - Khmelnitsky NPP Liquid Radwaste - Liquid Radioactive Waste LRSF - Liquid Radwaste Storage Facility MFE - Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine MSB - Multi-Place Sealed Basket MSI - Main State Inspectorate for Nuclear and Radiation Safety NF - Nuclear Facility NNEGC - National Nuclear Energy Generating Company ”Energoatom” Energoatom NPP - Nuclear Power Plant INR - Scientific Centre “Institute for Nuclear Research” PPM - Planned Preventive Maintenance PSA - Probabilistic Safety Analysis Radwaste - Radioactive Waste RC - Refuelling Container RCP - Reactor Coolant Pump RF - Reactor Facility RICP - Radioactive Waste Interim Confinement Point RM - Radiation Monitoring RNPP - Rivne NPP RV - Reactor Vessel RWDP - Radioactive Waste Disposal Point SAR - Safety Analysis Report SCFR - Self-Sustained
    [Show full text]