How the BJP Promotes Hindutva Through a Nationalist Agenda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How the BJP Promotes Hindutva Through a Nationalist Agenda ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 How the BJP Promotes Hindutva through a Nationalist Agenda EPW ENGAGE “Acche din” is defined as a non-inclusive India where dissent is dangerous to national unity. At the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) 2019 manifesto launch, Narendra Modi said that the country would move ahead with “one mission, one direction for the country.” This “direction,” however, is troubling: the ruling party has been apathetic to people beaten and lynched by self–styled cow vigilantes or “gau rakshaks,” with the Prime Minister maintaining silence over these incidents. Migrants have been attacked and even killed—occurrences that have received tacit and sometimes even explicit support from BJP party members. Under Modi, the BJP has espoused a more extreme ideology and used nationalism to gain support for right-wing policy, and to unite sentiments against religious minorities. This reading list explores the BJP’s rural and urban appeal, and the political strategy employed to sell Hindutva to the masses. 1) Can Democracy and Hegemony Coexist? The BJP’s core ideology is at odds with the foundation on which India’s democracy was built, writes Suhas Palshikar. Instead of the coexistence of democracy, nationalism and diversity, Palshikar argues, binaries are now being posed upon the populace: democracy vs nationalism and nationalism vs diversity. Palshikar contends that this has led to the emergence of a new political elite and political culture in India, which in the absence of an effective political counter, could cement this new hegemony. ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Hegemonies have a complex relationship with democracies. Hegemony represents the continuing battle between democratisation—the expansion of democracy—and elite efforts to keep the radical aspects of democracy limited. Thus, the coexistence of democracy and hegemony, though consisting of tensions, is not extraordinary. Most democracies often experience this coexistence and the tensions involved in it. In the case of India, the emerging hegemony also holds the possibility of altering the nature of India’s democracy as it was imagined and at least partially practised so far. In this sense, the emerging hegemony portends a distortion of democracy (Palshikar 2017d). 2) How Has the BJP Framed Their Development Agenda? A “politics of hate” can work to build a consensus for ruling class economics, writes Atul Sood, arguing that nationalism is often used by governments to hide their shortcomings, or to conceal fragmented social realities. We have often been mobilised in the past in the name of defending Indian pride or safeguarding some regional asmita; and the poor have been asked to tighten their belts, even when they barely have a waist, since “the ‘nation’ has been living beyond its means,” as Singh (2008: 190) said famously. The real issues of the people have been left behind. Further, Sood contends that the BJP uses nationalism to appeal to the so-called “aspirational” class, whose impatience allows the party to make economic and social decisions on behalf of the nation. Our perspective to evaluate the current regime has to be in sync with the perspective of the Indian people’s struggle for a better life. Very often, the idea of an inclusive India in this sense, where the governing outcomes are evaluated on the principle of including and benefiting the last person on the street, is counterpoised with the idea of “unity” of the nation, where no dissent is allowed, and scholastic critique is stopped at the gate of India’s national unity. This idea of a non-inclusive India is shared, in different hues, by a vast majority of Indian intellectuals within India or settled abroad. 3) Who Votes for Hindutva? Ganshyam Shah, writing after the BJP’s assembly election win in Gujarat in 1995, argues that the BJP does not rely solely upon its Hindutva ideology to win votes, instead copying the Congress’ electoral strategy by building a base among OBCs, Dalits and Adivasis, and also by fielding numerous OBC candidates for mass support. ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 The party has co-opted tribal and dalit leaders in different districts and has also hijacked Ambedkar' s ideology and symbols. Th e BJP extended its support to NGOs in opposing the proposed forest bill, whic h is anti-tribal . The party also supported various struggles of tribal s demanding land for cultivation. It won more than 29 per cent o f the tribal votes in tribal and non-tribal constituencies. Despite this, Shah contends that the state’s urban middle class voted for the BJP to express their disapproval of the Congress’ pro–poor stance, and also due to the allure of Hindutva. Shah writes that while the Congress campaigned around the fact that the BJP was a communal party, they were unable to convince the masses why communal politics were dangerous to the nation.. A large number of otherwise non-committed urban middle class BJP voters said that corruption or price rise was not the issue which determined their voting behaviour. They felt that the BJP was no better than the Congress. "All politicians are the same... But what is important is that the BJP stands for Hindus and will build Ram mandir in Ayodhya." This was a common retrain. 4) What is the BJP’s idea of an ‘Ideal’ India? As chief minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi elucidated that the “Ram rajya” is a “welfare state.” However, Anand Teltumbde argues that the BJP's “ideal rule” includes introducing the Ramayana in school syllabus, and an out-of-court settlement of the Ram Janmabhoomi–Babri Masjid dispute. Teltumbde writes that M K Gandhi first articulated Ram rajya as a concept during the freedom movement, but disassociated it from religion. Teltumbde contends that such a state under the BJP would exclude Dalits, Adivasis, and other minorities. Ram Rajya, in practice, appears to have served as rhetoric for all political parties to appeal to gullible Hindus … Ram Rajya is uncritically evoked as an ideal rule, as described in Ramayana. In the sixth book of Valmiki Ramayana, Lankakanda, All [that is, Brahmins (the priest-class), Kshatriyas (the warrior- class), Vaiśyas (the class of merchants and agriculturists), and Sudras (the servant class)] were performing their own duties, satisfied with their own work, and bereft of greed. (canto 116, verse 89). Further, Teltumbde accuses the Congress of pedlling “soft Hindutva” to reiterate that it is not “anti-Hindu.” While projecting Rahul Gandhi as a Brahmin should be condemned, Teltumbde says, it is instead being used by the Congress party to sell the idea of a secular India. ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 During the recent Gujarat elections, Rahul Gandhi visited 27 temples to stress that he too is a Hindu. The Congress has interpreted its victory in the 18 constituencies where these temples are situated (wresting 10 from the BJP) as being due to this temple run. It is neither ashamed to see that even in such a surcharged anti-BJP atmosphere, as in Gujarat, it could not wrest power from the BJP, nor does it realise that it can never compete against the BJP on the Hindutva platform. 5) Can the BJP be a Pan–India Party? Can the BJP’s win in Tripura be replicated in other states? Writing after the party’s assembly elections win, which ousted the Communist Party of India (Marxist) from power, Radhika Ramaseshan argues that rather than this election result proving the party’s countrywide appeal, demography played a larger role, with only 9% of the population Muslim. Further, the Hindu agenda failed to make inroads in other North East states, where its vegetarianism drive and “save the cow” campaign failed to resonate with voters. The “development” narrative is underpinned on the twin themes of “nationalism” and Hindutva, which are mired in the RSS’s ideology. While success was relatively simpler in Assam and Tripura because their politics essentially follows the trajectory of “mainstream” India, cracking the other states may be complex and a long haul. In the meantime, the BJP will make peace with the regional forces in the more problematic states and expediently forsake or dilute the Hindutva-specific agenda. It helps to have a government at the centre that can dangle and deliver carrots from time to time. But the BJP’s goal of a “Congress-mukt [free]” North East remains elusive. Read More: 1. How Autonomous Are the Branches? A Study of Narendra Modi’s BJP | Sylvie Guichard, 2013 2. How BJP Appropriated the Idea of Equality to Create a Divided India | AjayGudavarthy, 2018 3. BJP and the Ethnic Constitution of Nation | Ashok Chousalkar, 2000 Image-Credit/Misc: Image Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons/Bhartaiya Janata Party/CC BY-SA 2.0 ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846.
Recommended publications
  • From Secular Democracy to Hindu Rashtra Gita Sahgal*
    Feminist Dissent Hindutva Past and Present: From Secular Democracy to Hindu Rashtra Gita Sahgal* *Correspondence: secularspaces@ gmail.com Abstract This essay outlines the beginnings of Hindutva, a political movement aimed at establishing rule by the Hindu majority. It describes the origin myths of Aryan supremacy that Hindutva has developed, alongside the campaign to build a temple on the supposed birthplace of Ram, as well as the re-writing of history. These characteristics suggest that it is a far-right fundamentalist movement, in accordance with the definition of fundamentalism proposed by Feminist Dissent. Finally, it outlines Hindutva’s ‘re-imagining’ of Peer review: This article secularism and its violent campaigns against those it labels as ‘outsiders’ has been subject to a double blind peer review to its constructed imaginary of India. process Keywords: Hindutva, fundamentalism, secularism © Copyright: The Hindutva, the fundamentalist political movement of Hinduism, is also a Authors. This article is issued under the terms of foundational movement of the 20th century far right. Unlike its European the Creative Commons Attribution Non- contemporaries in Italy, Spain and Germany, which emerged in the post- Commercial Share Alike License, which permits first World War period and rapidly ascended to power, Hindutva struggled use and redistribution of the work provided that to gain mass acceptance and was held off by mass democratic movements. the original author and source are credited, the The anti-colonial struggle as well as Left, rationalist and feminist work is not used for commercial purposes and movements recognised its dangers and mobilised against it. Their support that any derivative works for anti-fascism abroad and their struggles against British imperialism and are made available under the same license terms.
    [Show full text]
  • HINDUTVA AS an INFORMAL INSTITUTION Abstract
    International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences Vol: 3 Issue: 4 e-ISSN: 2636-8137 Fall 2020 HINDUTVA AS AN INFORMAL INSTITUTION Hayati ÜNLÜ1 Makale İlk Gönderim Tarihi / Recieved (First): 30.05.2020 Makale Kabul Tarihi / Accepted: 10.10.2020 Abstract In this article, Hindu nationalism has been considered as an informal institution through an institutionalist perspective. The purpose of the article is to identify how Hindutva functions as an informal institution. In this context, Hindutva has been evaluated based on three basic features of an institution: setting rules, shaping behavior and effecting the result. The rule- making feature has been studied through the ideas of ideologists such as Savarkar and Golwalkar with reference to the Hindu social order. Subsequently, it has been argued that these socio-political rules have been accepted by the huge social segments in the country and influenced the behaviors of the social base. Finally, it has been emphasized how Hindutva has influenced the result and brought the Hindu nationalists to power. Accordingly, it will be concluded how Hindutva has become the mainstream of politics in the country. However, with reference to the recent Citizenship Law protests in the country, it has been noted how other informal institutions, particularly secularism, threaten the future of Hindutva. Keywords: Hindutva, Informal Institutions, Rules, Behaviors, Results. 1 Dr. Öğr. Üyesi, Şırnak Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, [email protected] , ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2645-5930 Vol: 3 Issue: 4 Hayati Ünlü Hindutva as an Informal Institution Fall 2020 1. Introduction The return of institutions has been discussed in global politics these days.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindu Fundamentalism and Christian Response in India
    HINDU FUNDAMENTALISM AND CHRISTIAN RESPONSE IN INDIA Rev. Shadakshari T.K. (Bangalore, India and Pastoring Divyajyothi Church of the Nazarene) Introduction One of the purposes of religion, humanly speaking, is to enable people to live a responsible life. One desire is that religious people may not disturb the harmonious life; rather, they may contribute towards it. Today, religions have become a source of conflict and violence in many Asian societies. This is very evident in India where the inter-relationship among religions is breaking up. The contemporary problem in India is the question of nationalism and the issue of marginalized identities. Christians are caught between two: participation in the nationalism in the one hand and commitment to the cause of the marginalized on the other. There is an awakening of nationalism, which bears strong religious stamp, which is strongly promoted by the Hindutva ideology. At the same time there is a strong awakening of the Tribals and Dalits. In this context, the question comes to our mind: how do Christians in India serve both nationalism and marginal groups when both of them are opposing each other? I am not promising the absolute answer for the question raised. However, this article provides some clues by analyzing the historical development of religious fundamentalism and suggesting an appropriate response for Christians. Though there are several religious fundamental groups in the history of India (including Hinduism, Islam, Sikhism, and others), this article limits its study to the religious fundamentalism of Hinduism. The importance of Hindu fundamentalism lies in its very contemporary and nationalistic scope, compared to other, more regional expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Modi: Two Years On
    Modi: Two Years On Hudson Institute September 2016 South Asia Program Research Report Modi: Two Years On Aparna Pande, Director, India Initiative Husain Haqqani, Director, South and Central Asia South Asia Program © 2016 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Overview 5 Defense 13 Self-Sufficiency 14 Challenges and Opportunities 15 Education and Skill Development 18 Background 18 Modi Administration on Education 20 Prime Minister Modi’s Interventions in Skill Development 20 Challenges and Opportunities 21 India’s Energy Challenge 23 Coal 23 Petroleum 24 Natural Gas 25 Nuclear 27 Renewables 28 Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010) Elaisha Nandrajog Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2010 Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010) Elaisha Nandrajog Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Nandrajog, Elaisha, "Hindutva and Anti-Muslim Communal Violence in India Under the Bharatiya Janata Party (1990-2010)" (2010). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 219. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/219 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE HINDUTVA AND ANTI-MUSLIM COMMUNAL VIOLENCE IN INDIA UNDER THE BHARATIYA JANATA PARTY (1990-2010) SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR RODERIC CAMP AND PROFESSOR GASTÓN ESPINOSA AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY ELAISHA NANDRAJOG FOR SENIOR THESIS (Spring 2010) APRIL 26, 2010 2 CONTENTS Preface 02 List of Abbreviations 03 Timeline 04 Introduction 07 Chapter 1 13 Origins of Hindutva Chapter 2 41 Setting the Stage: Precursors to the Bharatiya Janata Party Chapter 3 60 Bharat : The India of the Bharatiya Janata Party Chapter 4 97 Mosque or Temple? The Babri Masjid-Ramjanmabhoomi Dispute Chapter 5 122 Modi and his Muslims: The Gujarat Carnage Chapter 6 151 Legalizing Communalism: Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act (2002) Conclusion 166 Appendix 180 Glossary 185 Bibliography 188 3 PREFACE This thesis assesses the manner in which India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emerged as the political face of Hindutva, or Hindu ethno-cultural nationalism. The insights of scholars like Christophe Jaffrelot, Ashish Nandy, Thomas Blom Hansen, Ram Puniyani, Badri Narayan, and Chetan Bhatt have been instrumental in furthering my understanding of the manifold elements of Hindutva ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – Sangh Parivar – Christians – Punjab
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: IND34592 Country: India Date: 2 April 2009 Keywords: India – Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) – Sangh Parivar – Christians – Punjab This response was prepared by the Research & Information Services Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. This research response may not, under any circumstance, be cited in a decision or any other document. Anyone wishing to use this information may only cite the primary source material contained herein. Questions 1. What is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Sangh Parivar? 2. What anti-Christian activities have they been involved in, in Punjab, over the past couple of years? RESPONSE 1. What is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Hindu Sangh Parivar? An RRT research response dated 13 February 2009 provides information on the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Sangh Parivar (RRT Research & Information 2009, Research Response IND34298, 13 February (Question 1) – Attachment 1). The documents referred to in the research response include a research paper dated 2 May 2007 by the International Affairs and Defence Section of the UK Parliament House of Commons Library which indicates that: The BJP [Bharatiya Janata Party] is the political wing of the Sangh Parivar, a group of Hindu nationalist organisations which includes the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a national volunteer organisation, and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), an organisation of Hindu monks.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage As Violation of Human Rights
    Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage as Violation of Human Rights Case of India: a small Note Ram Puniyani India is a country with rich diversity. It has immense cultural heritage which came as a synthesis, blending and independent existence of different cultures which interacted and lived together harmoniously for centuries. It is a place where the people of all religions have been frequenting the places of worship of other religions. We have Bhakti (devotional) stream which is revered by people of all religions, it has Sufi saint shrines where people of different religions rub shoulders with each other in paying respect to the humanistic Sufi saints. There are places like Shabriamala in Kerala, where the Hindu devotees throng. On their way to their favorite deity they also visit a mosque and a Church. We have Mother Velinkini shrine where again people of diverse faith come and pay their respect. Such places abound all over the country, well revered and respected by one and all. Last few decades there is a lot of problem in such traditions of the country. The identity based politics of Hindutva has targeted the religious minorities particularly Muslims and Christians. Hindutva is not religion, it is a politics based on the dominant tendency within Hinduism, i.e. Brahmanism. Due to the overwhelming domination of Hindutva politics in cultural matters, in matters related to places of worship, and the ones related to food habits, the traditions are being violated on political ground. The major victims of this are not only religious minorities, but even the indigenous people, Adivasis, and other downtrodden sections of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Rahul Sagar, Hindu Nationalists and the Cold
    Chapter Ten Hindu Nationalists and the Cold War Rahul Sagar It is generally accepted that during the Cold War divergences between “hope and reality” rendered India and America “estranged democracies.”1 Te pre- cise nature of the Indo- American relationship during these decades remains a subject of fruitful study. For instance, Rudra Chaudhuri has argued that the Cold War’s many crises actually prompted India and the United States to “forge” a more nuanced relationship than scholars have realized.2 Tis chapter does not join this discussion. It examines a diferent side of the story. Rather than study the workings of the Congress Party–afliated political and bureaucratic elite in power during the Cold War, it focuses on the principal Opposition—the ideas and policies of the Hindu Mahasabha, the Jan Sangh, and the Bharatiya Janata Party (bJP), which have championed the cause of Hindu nationalism. Te Cold War–era policies of these parties have not been studied carefully thus far. A common assumption is that these parties had little to say about international afairs or that, to the extent that they had something to say, their outlook was resolutely militant. Tis chapter corrects this misperception. It shows that these parties’ policies alternated between being attracted to and being repulsed by the West. Distaste for communism and commitment to democracy drove them to seek friendship with the West, while resentment at U.S. eforts to contain India as well as fears about ma- terialism and Westernization prompted them to demand that the West be kept at a safe distance. 229 false sTarTs Surprisingly little has been written about the diversity of Indian views on international relations in the Cold War era.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister Says the Scheme Will Secure Seed Funding, Inspire Innovation, Support Transformative Ideas, Facilitate Implementation, and Start Startup Revolution;
    Press Information Bureau Government of India Shri Piyush Goyal launches the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme; Minister says the scheme will Secure seed funding, Inspire innovation, Support transformative ideas, Facilitate implementation, and Start startup revolution; 3,600 startups are expected to benefit from the scheme; New Delhi; 19.4.21 Minister of Railways, Commerce & Industry, Consumer Affairs and Food & Public Distribution Shri Piyush Goyal today launched the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS). The Fund aims to provide financial assistance to startups for proof of concept, prototype development, product trials, market entry, and commercialization. The Scheme was announced by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi on 16th January 2021 in his Grand Plenary address of ‘Prarambh: Startup India International Summit’, marking the five-year anniversary of the Startup India initiative. Rs. 945 Crore corpus will be divided over the next 4 years for providing seed funding to eligible startups through eligible incubators across India. The scheme is expected to support an estimated 3,600 startups through 300 incubators. Speaking on the occasion, Shri Goyal said that this scheme is being launched within 3 months of its announcement, one of the fastest in the recent times. He said that times are tough, but our resolve is strong, and never before has it become more important for us to empower our startups. The Minister said that the SISFS will Secure seed funding, Inspire innovation, Support transformative ideas, Facilitate implementation, and Start startup revolution. He said that this Scheme will create a robust startup ecosystem, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns of India, which are often deprived of adequate funding.
    [Show full text]
  • India's 2019 National Election and Implications for U.S. Interests
    India’s 2019 National Election and Implications for U.S. Interests June 28, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45807 SUMMARY R45807 India’s 2019 National Election and Implications June 28, 2019 for U.S. Interests K. Alan Kronstadt India, a federal republic and the world’s most populous democracy, held elections to seat a new Specialist in South Asian lower house of parliament in April and May of 2019. Estimates suggest that more than two-thirds Affairs of the country’s nearly 900 million eligible voters participated. The 545-seat Lok Sabha (People’s House) is seated every five years, and the results saw a return to power of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was chief minister of the west Indian state of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014. Modi’s party won decisively—it now holds 56% of Lok Sabha seats and Modi became the first Indian leader to win consecutive majorities since Indira Gandhi in 1971. The United States and India have been pursuing an expansive strategic partnership since 2005. The Trump Administration and many in the U.S. Congress welcomed Modi’s return to power for another five-year term. Successive U.S. Presidents have deemed India’s growing power and influence a boon to U.S. interests in Asia and globally, not least in the context of balancing against China’s increasing assertiveness. India is often called a preeminent actor in the Trump Administration’s strategy for a “free and open Indo-Pacific.” Yet there are potential stumbling blocks to continued development of the partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Piyush Goyal (52) Is the Minister of State with Independent Charge for Power, Coal, New & Renewable Energy and Mines in the Government of India
    Piyush Goyal (52) is the Minister of State with Independent Charge for Power, Coal, New & Renewable Energy and Mines in the Government of India. He is currently a Member of Ra- jya Sabha and was earlier the National Treasurer of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He headed the BJP's Information Communication Campaign Committee and oversaw the pub- licity and advertising campaign of the party including the social media outreach for the In- dian General Elections 2014. He has had a brilliant academic record- all-India second rank holder Chartered Accountant and second rank holder in Law in Mumbai University. He was a well-known investment banker and he has advised top corporates on management strategy and growth. He earlier served on the Board of India’s largest commercial bank, the State Bank of India and Bank of Baroda. He has participated in Leadership Programs at Yale University (2011), Oxford University (2012) and Princeton University (2013) and is currently pursuing the Owner/President Management (OPM) Program at Harvard Business School. During his 30 year long political career, he has held several important positions at differ- ent levels in the BJP and is in the National Executive of the Party. He had the privilege of being mentored by stalwarts such as Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee, former Prime Minister of India. He was also nominated by the Government of India to the prestigious Task Force for Interlinking of Rivers in 2002. His father Late Vedprakash Goyal was Union Minister of Shipping and the National Trea- surer of the BJP for over two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS ISSUE Interest”
    DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION MHRD GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ISSUE 21 ON HIGHER EDUCATION DECEMBER 2015 “An investment in knowledge pays the best THIS ISSUE interest” HRM confers National Award - Benjamin Franklin for Innovations in Educational Administration 2015 Smt. Irani confers National Smt. Smriti Irani, Minister of Prizes for “Kala Utsav - 2015” HRD, and Mr. Sajid Javid, Secretary of State, Business Access to Higher Education for Innovation and Skills, UK, Economically Poor launching the 2016: UK-INDIA Joint Statement by DG UNESCO Year of Education, Research and the Minister for Human and Innovation, at a function, Resource Development of India in New Delhi on December 09, on the Occasion of National 2015. Mathematics Day, 2015 Ministry Constitutes Drafting UK-INDIA Year of Education, Research and Innovation Launched Committee for New Education Policy India and United Kingdom launched a done under earlier phases of UKIERI. He Initiatives of Ministry of joint initiative “2016: UK-INDIA Year of anticipated that more than 100 Human Resource Development Education, Research and Innovation” in academicians from UK would be coming HRM Launched All India Survey New Delhi on December 9, 2015. Speaking under GIAN over next two years. Under the on Higher Education on the occasion, Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani, UK Generation India program, they would Minister of HRD, highlighted the be looking forward to send 25,000 UK Awards for Promotion of Sindhi importance of mobility of students and students to India during the next 5 (five) Language Announced faculty and expressed hope that, under years. HRM Launches “The Global the GIAN Program, more UK academicians Initiative of Academic would be able to come to India in 2016.
    [Show full text]