Zbornik Radova Nova Antička Duklja IV 2013 NEW ANTIQUE DOCLEA IV 2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Zbornik radova NOVA antička duklja iV 2013 NEW ANTIQUE dOClEa iV 2013 With the support of Participation Programme United Nations Cultural Organization EDICIJA KULTURNO NASLEĐE EDITION CULTURAL HERITAGE Zbornik Nova antička Duklja IV Collection New Antique Doclea IV Izdavač: Publisher: Muzeji i galerije Podgorice Museums and Galleries of Podgorica Za izdavača: For the publisher: Niko Martinović Niko Martinovic Urednik: Editor: Dragan Radović Dragan Radovic Prevod: Translation: Mirjana Živanović Mirjana Zivanovic Radule Bojović Radule Bojovic Ana Vlahović Ana Vlahovic Dizajn i priprema za štampu: Design and prepress: Zlatko Ljumić Zlatko Ljumic Dragiša Gile Ćalov Dragisa Gile Calov Štampa: Print: Grafo Crna Gora Grafo Crna Gora Tiraž: 300 Print run: 300 CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији Национална библиотека Црне Горе, Цетиње ISBN 978-9940-590-19-2 (Knj. 4) COBISS.CG-ID 16046096 MIRJANA SANADER .....................................................................................................................................7 nts O sudjElOVanju žEna u radu E ranE CrkVE na primjEru jEdnOg EpigrafskOg spOmEnika iz dukljE nt On thE partiCipatiOn Of WOmEn in thE WOrk Of thE Early ChurCh, BasEd On CO OnE EpigraphiC insCriptiOn frOm duklja ИВАНА ГРУЈИЋ ...........................................................................................................................................19 КерамиКа ii веКа на ДоКлеји thE ii CEntury pOttEry in dOClEa RICCARDO BELCARI ............................................................................................................................55 sadržaj / CartOlinE BalCaniChE. una VEduta di dOClEa E i Viaggi dEi fratElli BaldaCCi in mOntEnEgrO razglEdniCE sa Balkana. pOglEd na duklju i putOVanja BraĆE BaldaĆi CrnOm gOrOm MLADEN ZAGARČANIN ...................................................................................................................67 pOdVOdnO - arhEOlOŠka istražiVanja na prOstOru BarskOg i ulCinjskOg akVATOrija thE undErWATEr-arChaEOlOgiCal rEsEarChEs in Bar and ulCinj aQUATOrium arEa DEJAN DRAŠKOVIĆ ............................................................................................................................121 BrOnzana figurina glumCa sa dOklEjE i prOBlEm uBikaCijE antičkOg tEatra BrOnzE aCtOr figurinE frOm dOClEa andthE prOBlEm Of Locating THE ANCIENT THEATER nEW antiQuE dOClEa iV Poštovani čitaoci Predstavljamo vam četvrti broj Zbornika „Nova antička Duklja“. Nakon prva tri broja posvećena isključivo antičkoj Dokleji, ovaj četvrti broj donosi i tekst koji izlazi iz temstskog okvira nametnutog naslovom Zbornika i prvobitnom uređivačkom koncepcijom. Namjera izdavača i uređivačkog tima je da od sledećeg broja Zbornik preraste u klasično aheološko glasilo sa temama iz svih sfera arheologije ali da Dokleja i istraživanja koja se na njoj sprovode, i dalje ostanu primarni interes Zbornika. Urednik Dear readers, We are presenting the fourth issue of Almanac “New Antique Doclea“. After first three issues de- voted exclusively to ancient Doclea, this, the fourth, is bringing the text that comes out of the theme box imposed by the title of the Almanac and the original editorial concept. The intention of the pu- blisher and the editorial team is that, starting from the following number, the Almanac to grow into a classic archaeological newsletter with topics from all fields of archaeology but Doclea and researches being carried out on the site,to still remain the primary interest of the Almanac. Editor 5 MIRJANA SANADER O sudjElOVanju žEna u radu ranE CrkVE na primjEru jEdnOg EpigrafskOg spOmEnika iz dukljE On thE partiCipatiOn Of WOmEn in thE WOrk Of thE Early ChurCh, BasEd On OnE EpigraphiC insCriptiOn frOm duklja MIRJANA SANADER O sudjElOVanju žEna u radu On thE partiCipatiOn Of WOmEn in thE ranE CrkVE na primjEru jEdnOg WOrk Of thE Early ChurCh, EpigrafskOg spOmEnika iz dukljE BasEd On OnE EpigraphiC insCriptiOn frOm duklja Danas se ženama u radu najranijeg razdoblja In recent times, women working for the Christian rane kršćanske Crkve pripisuje daleko veća uloga Church during its earliest historical period have been nego se pretpostavljalo, pa čak i veća nego li je attributed a far greater role than previously assumed, njihova uloga u današnje vrijeme. Tako autori/ce even greater than the role they hold in the Church no- upućuju da su one ne samo imale čvrsto mjesto wadays. Thus the authors will indicate that they not u liturgiji i u svakodnevnom životu kršćanskih only held a firm place in the liturgy and daily life of zajednica, nego da su pridonijele i širenju Christian communities, but that they also contributed 1 kršćanskog nauka.1 to the spread of the Christian doctrine. U istraživanju uloge žena u ranoj Crkvi je In researching the role of women in the early osim literarnih izvora pomogla i ranokršćanska Church, early Christian archaeology has been as arheologija jer su se sačuvali brojni natpi- helpful as the written sources in providing informa- tion, since numerous inscriptions on funerary and si, na nadgrobnim i votivnim spomenicima votive monuments have been preserved, listing the a na kojima su navedene i službe koje su žene services performed by women in the early Church. za života obavljale u Crkvi. Na tim natpisi- These inscriptions tell us how, in the first few centu- ma možemo tako pročitati da su u najranijim ries of Christianity, certain women acted as apostles, stoljećima kršćanstva određene žene djelovale prophetesses, theology teachers, community leaders, kao apostolice, proročice, učiteljice teologije, deaconesses, presbyters and bishops. 2 Among them, voditeljice zajednice, đakonice, prezbiterice i the votive inscription from the Roman province of 2 biskupice. Među njima se učestalo citira i jedan Praevalitana mentioning the deaconess Ausonia, is zavjetni natpis iz rimske provincije Prevalitanije frequently cited (CIL III 13845). Much has been written koji spominje đakonicu Auzoniju (CIL III 13845). on the inscription itself, with authors discussing the O samom je natpisu je dosta pisano pri čemu circumstances of the find, the date of its creation, and su autori raspravljali o okolnostima njegovog na- its transcription.3 However, this paper will focus on laza, o vremenu njegovog nastanka ali i o njego- Ausonia’s title of deaconess, the main reason why the voj transkripciji. 3 U ovom radu ćemo se međutim inscription is cited in papers exploring the participa- posvetiti Auzonijinoj tituli đakonice zbog koje se tion of women in early Church work. taj natpis i pojavljuje u literaturi koja istražuje Since there is still a thesis on Ausonia’s title being sudjelovanje žena u radu rane Crkve. Kako se po- granted to her, on the account of her husband being negdje još uvijek može pročitati i teza da Auzoni- a deacon, using finds from the latest research, we ja nosi titulu jer joj je suprug bio đakon, pokušat will try to determine if that was, indeed, the case. In ćemo uz pomoć novih istraživanja pokazati je li addition, this research paper will also provide new in- to uistinu tako. Tako ćemo dobiti i nova saznanja formation on the work done by women in the early o radu žena u dokleatskoj ranokršćanskoj za- Christian community of Duklja. jednici. The Duklja Inscription Dukljanski natpis This inscription (230 x 25,5 x 40 cm), regarded as lost today, was last seen in 1902 according to P. Stic- Ovaj je natpis (230 x 25,5 x 40 cm) koji danas coti, when it was halved and the inscription was car- važi kao izgubljen, po P. Sticcotiju posljednji put 1 On the ecclesiastical service of women in the early Christian Church see the bibliog- 1 O službama žena u ranokršćanskoj Crkvi vidi bibliografije kod:Martimort 1985;Alex- raphy of: Martimort 1985; Alexandre 1997; Eisen 2000; Jensen, 2003. On the sources on andre 1997; Eisen 2000; Jensen, 2003. Vidi izvore o đakonicama kod:Madigan, Osiek2005. deaconesses see: Madigan, Osijek 2005. 2 Eisen2000. 2 Eisen 2000. 3 U posljednjem radu (nama poznatom ) koji spominje ovaj natpis donesena je i opširna 3 The last paper (that we know of) mentioning this inscription lists an extensive bibliog- bibliografija o njemu kao i problematika njegovog nalaza, vidi: Gelichi, Negrelli, Leardi, raphy, as well as the problem of the find, see: Gelichi, Negrelli, Leardi, .Sabbionesi, Belcari, .Sabbionesi, Belcari, 2012, str. 11 – 40. 2012, pg. 11 – 40. 9 nOVa antička duklja iV viđen 1902. g. kad je prepolovljen na dva dijela, ved off, after which it served as building material for a pa mu je otklesan tekst, nakon čega je poslužio local farmhouse.4 For this reason we are only familiar u gradnji neke seoske kuće. 4 To je razlog zbog with its drawing today. The location of the find was kojeg nam je danas poznat samo po crtežu. Mje- at the entrance on the west facade of a small cruci- sto njegovog nalaza je ulaz na zapadnoj fasadi form building in Duklja (Church C). 5 The date of the manjeg križolikog objekta u Dokleji (crkva C).5 inscription sparked a lively debate. Shortly after the Datiranje ovog spomenika izazvalo je živahnu discovery, the inscription was dated to the 6th centu- raspravu. Natpis je netom nakon otkrića dati- ry. However, in 1957 I. Stojković – Nikolajević placed ran u 6. st. Međutim I. Stojković – Nikolajević ga it to the Early Middle Ages, roughly the 9th century, only to date it to the 6th century again, a few decades 1957.g. smješta u rani Srednji vijek odnosno u 9 later.6The most accepted date in scientific literature is st. da bi ga nekoliko desetljeća kasnije datirala u 6 the 6th century, however some