DOCSLIB.ORG

Hello, I Am Writing As a Concerned Citizen Regarding St Edwards Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAINT EDWARD SEMINARY LEASE COMMENTS DECEMBER 2016 Hello, I am writing as a concerned citizen regarding St Edwards Park and the potential for the renovation of turning it into a lodge. I wanted to put my two cents in and let you know that it is very important for there to be plenty of parking for non-hotel visitors and am requesting for an underground parking structure to be required. Even thought I am not for this renovation as I am very concerned for the wild-life. The noise, the visitors, the construction, the constant light pollution...I am sure all this new activity will affect all living things nearby, where will they go? Having grown up in Washington, and have lived here since the 70's, I have witnessed so much forest being cut down for us humans. There is not much left. St Edwards is such a special place to visit, so special that I would give up my rights to be there so as to make it a sanctuary for wildlife and not disturb them. However, having said my peace, if there is to be a 'lodge', I do request a parking structure to make room for us visitors who like to take quiet walks in the forest. Washington State Park Officials: Please approve the Kevin Daniels' Firm's proposal to restore the historical and architecturally significant Seminary Building in St. Edwards Park. This proposal provides the funds to restore this beautiful building to its former glory and an economically sustainable future that park visitors can use, enjoy, and be proud of for years to come. It would be unacceptable and contrary to our State Parks' mission to adopt the recommendation of a few outspoken park neighbors who would prefer to see the Seminary Building partially torn down or continue to deteriorate just to keep the park "as is". St. Edwards Park belongs to all the citizens of Washington State, not just some obstructionist park neighbors. Thank you for your consideration. Commenter: I am absolutely outraged at the prospect of St Edwards being sold off. This park is our favorite place to go for hikes and our kids grew up walking the trails there. This is a jewel in King County's crown that you are tossing away. This cannot happen. I thought the plan was to sell the old monastery but not the 300+ acres. Now I am being told that the acreage is being sold off too and I am livid. This park is packed with hikers, bikes and families. It is one of the best parks in the Seattle area. Please, please do not go through with this sale. It would be a great loss to future generations. Michael: Dear (redacted), Your information is untrue. Nothing is being sold. The park is currently 316-acres in size and this proposal will add 9.77-acres to the park, making it a bigger park! Quite the opposite from what you are hearing. The Seminary and associated buildings would be leased in this proposal, which means State Parks retains ownership. Private funds are being used, but the lease is explicit that the building be open to the public. Private money for public benefit. And at the end of the 62-year lease, the building will be improved at no cost to the taxpayer. There is no sale. Please do not fret about that. I don’t know where you got that awful information, but it certainly sounds scary! Please call me if you would like to discuss. My number is (360) 902-8671. Commenter: What a relief! My husband and I are ecstatic to hear the information we received is incorrect. Thank you so much for the quick response. I will pass on the information. I am so sorry that I didn't ask first before reading you the riot act. Yikes. It just shows how passionate some of us Washingtonians are about our public parks. Thank you for all the work you do to keep Washington beautiful for future generations. I have enjoyed events and taken advantage of this beautiful PUBLIC Park. I would argue against the proposal that would deprive citizens of the amenities of this PUBLIC Park. I would urge further study and look to the home owners and community members for ways to support this treasured property and maintain it in the public trust. I support the Requested Actions of the Parks Commission including the following: 1. Approve the exchange of the McDonald Property for the 62-year lease of the Seminary Building, as set forth in the Exchange Agreement (Appendix 5) 2. Approve the 62-year lease of the Seminary Building and associated land and structures. 3. Delegate authority to the Director to execute the Exchange Agreement and 62-year lease with Daniels Real Estate to rehabilitate the Seminary, consistent with terms of the draft lease 4. Delegate authority to the Director to approve minor changes to the Seminary lease after it has been executed. There are many who do not want change and have unrealistic ideals about the seminary building being rehabbed and operated by a non-profit. Obviously, that is not going to happen or it would have in the 38+ years since the land was sold to the State for a park. Please consider what is best for the entire community and not just the comments of the vocal minority who use misinformation and scare tactics to turn the public against a project. (This happened in the past with the McMenamins proposal which was subsequently built in Bothell). If the community’s interest is to preserve the seminary building, their efforts should be ensuring the project is the best possible and not just saying no to any proposal. I live within walking distance of St. Edwards and hike the trails 3-4 times/week. I will be impacted by the additional traffic in the surrounding area but feel the additional tax revenue to the City of Kenmore, locating a destination facility in Kenmore, having a restaurant within walking distance, increasing the visibility and usage of the park, the addition of the waterfront McDonald property to the park, etc. are acceptable tradeoffs. Issues I would like considered include: · Require the project provide significant benefit to the community · Require the construction of a parking garage to serve the lodge. The existing parking will not be sufficient for both park users and lodge patrons/staff. · Require improvements to the access road from Juanita Drive. The existing narrow, 2-lane roadway is not sufficient to handle an additional 800+ peak hour daily trips. • Consider adding a second entrance as there is currently only the one mentioned above. I can't find the proper link to the meeting to be held this week. I did submit feedback last spring, and have not changed my mind that the Daniel's Real Estate plan is the best option available to save the beauty and practicality of the park. I urge you to vote in favor of continuing the project. The news I heard says the ball parks project has no bearing on the hotel plan--but strongly feel that the traffic, noise, garbage, lighting and parking for the ball games will be far more detrimental to the peace and quiet than that created by a hotel. I hope you had a great week, I am sure you are looking forward to the weekend. It's been a while since we have been in touch, I have a couple of questions which I hope are not too difficult to answer. I recently learned about the upcoming Commission meeting January 5 at Bastyr U and just read the December 5th Press Release posted to Parks site, copied into the email below. I am trying to understand the timing of the lease review and decision making process visa vie timing of the Final EIS. The Press Release makes no mention of the Final EIS, the timing of its release and consideration of its findings in the final Lease Proposal. My understanding is that the purpose of the SEPA - EIS process, culminating with the Final EIS, is identify and articulate specific environmental concerns and possibilities for mitigation that may influence/impact (in this case) the specific provisions of the proposed lease. This being the case, I am not understanding the logic behind making final determinations on the proposed lease Before the Final EIS has been made public, all environmental concerns raised by the public have been addressed, and possible mitigation measures identified. I'm not understanding how the process on final lease negotiations can move forward before this essential SEPA step has been taken. Can you provide me some explanation of the timing of the final EIS visa vie timing of final Lease preparation. Based on the Press Release, I now understand the final proposed lease will be made public 12/22 with final comments due 8 days later, 12/30. How can the public fully evaluate the specific lease provisions without the scientific basis of findings which should be promulgated in the Final EIS? What can the public expect re timing of release of the Final EIS and how does this timing fit into the overall time frame of lease prep and approvals? Second, I do not understand the final sentence in the press release. "A proposal by the City of Kenmore to improve ball fields at the park is unrelated to the building lease under consideration and has no bearing on the proposed Seminary project." The Seminary DEIS and EIS was/is directed to consider and address Cumulative Impacts of the possible Seminary hotel development and the proposed ball fields rolling out in one park landscape.
Recommended publications
  • Senate Committee

    Senate Committee

    2019-21 CAPITAL BUDGET BALANCE SHEET & PROJECT LISTS Ways & Means Committee Senate Committee SENATE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE APRIL 2019 http://www.leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/WM/Pages/default.aspx 2019-21 Biennial and 2019 Supplemental Capital Budget Senate Committee (SSB 5134) Includes Alternative Finacing/Certificates of Participation (Dollars in Thousands) Debt Limit Other Bond Other Funds Total Funds Bonds Authority6,7 2017-19 Capital Budget with Proposed 2019 Supplemental Bond Authorization1 $2,930,230 $20,000 Appropriations 2017-192 and 1st Supplemental Capital Budget3 $2,919,383 $47,117 $1,645,784 $4,612,284 2017-19 2nd Supplemental Capital Budget5 ($39,832) $0 $5,350 ($34,482) Total 2017-19 with Proposed 2nd Supplemental $2,879,551 $47,117 $1,651,134 $4,577,802 2017-19 Remaining Bond Authority $50,679 2019-21 Capital Budget (New) Bond Authorization4 Tax Exempt Bonds $2,881,529 $52,000 State Taxable Building Construction Account $179,020 Bond Authorization4 $3,060,549 $52,000 Appropriations5 Tax Exempt Bonds $2,899,355 $52,000 $1,959,191 $4,910,546 Bond Capacity Adjustment8 ($83,576) $0 State Taxable Building Construction Account $179,020 $0 $0 $179,020 Total 2019-21 Proposal $2,994,799 $52,000 $1,959,191 $5,089,566 2019-21 Remaining Bond Authority $116,429 1. Chapter 3, Laws of 2018 2. Chapter 2, Laws of 2018 3. Chapter 298, Laws of 2018 4. Bond Bill SSB 5133 5. Capital Budget Bill SSB 5134 6. Chapter 1, Laws of 2018 7. SSB 5537 (behavioral health facilities) 8. Reflects swapping SB 5993 MTCA cash for bond proceeds on MTCA project reappropriations Senate Ways & Means 1 2019-21 Capital Budget Senate Committee (SSB 5134) * Includes Projects Funded through Alternative Financing (Dollars In Thousands) New Appropriations State Bonds Total Governmental Operations Office of the Secretary of State 1.
  • Saint Edward State Park Environmental Education And

    Saint Edward State Park Environmental Education And

    Saint Edward State Park Environmental Education and Research Center Advancing public understanding, connection with nature, scientific knowledge and stewardship of Pacific Northwest ecosystems for our youth and their families. June 2019 1 Saint Edward EERC Planning Committee Kara Adams Elizabeth Lunney Director of Community Engagement Org. Development Consultant Office of Community-Based Learning and Research Ann McMahon University of Washington Bothell Executive Director of Research Strategy for Broad Impact Carolyn Brennan Office of Research Assistant Vice Chancellor University of Washington Bothell Office of Research University of Washington Bothell Keegan O’Neill Student Assistant Susan Carlson Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences E3 Washington University of Washington Bothell Alexa Russo Sustainability Coordinator Sustainability Office University of Washington Bothell David Stokes Professor Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences University of Washington Bothell The Planning Team would like to acknowledge its appreciation for the steady partnership and sound advice of Steve Brand and Peter Herzog of Washington State Parks. Special thanks also to Kelly Snyder and Ruth Johnston at UW Bothell for their counsel and support during this process. State Senator David Frockt helped secure funding for this planning study. He has been a steadfast advocate for stronger K-12 education and a supporter of Saint Edward State Park. State Representative Gerry Pollet was also instrumental in securing funding for this study; he encouraged partnership with the University of Washington during the planning process in order to access the faculty, research and other academic resources of the institution. We are truly grateful. Nancy Ousley at the City of Kenmore generously offered first-class meeting space at Kenmore City Hall, and Scott Morris of the Finn Hill Neighborhood Alliance made our Kirkland meeting possible.
  • Saint Edward Seminary Preliminary Staff Finding on Commerce Study - Requested Action

    Saint Edward Seminary Preliminary Staff Finding on Commerce Study - Requested Action

    Item E-X: Saint Edward Seminary Preliminary Staff Finding on Commerce Study - Requested Action EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This item asks the Commission to determine whether there is a viable public or nonprofit use of the Saint Edward Seminary based on criteria established in Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2667, passed by the 2016 Washington State Legislature. This item supports the Strategic Plan goal to develop amenities that advance transformation by leveraging partner-funded park development projects. INTRODUCTION: In spring 2016, legislation was signed by the Governor that required actions by the State Parks and Recreation Commission and the Department of Commerce regarding the Saint Edward Seminary. Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2667 (ESSHB2667) directed Commerce to conduct an economic viability study and directed the Commission to affirmatively make a determination based on that study and other Commission-criteria on the viability of a public or non-profit use of the Seminary property. As directed in the bill, State Parks staff consulted with Commerce and provided them with existing background data on the Seminary including various historic studies, cost estimates, and proposals that could be incorporated into the study. This agenda item provides State Park staff analysis and recommendations of the following: · Requirements of ESSHB2667 · Background information on the multi-decades search for preservation and re-use of the Saint Edward Seminary property · Interpretation of the Commerce study · Analysis of Public and Non-Profit Options in light of evaluation criteria in ESSHB2667 · Staff recommendations for a Commission finding pursuant to ESSHB2667 Requirements of Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2667 ESSHB2667, passed by the 2016 Session of the Washington State Legislature and codified as RCW79A.05.025(2), provides an opportunity for the Commission to enter into a lease of the Seminary grounds of up to 62 years.
  • City of Kenmore Receives Help Preserving Saint Edward Seminary

    City of Kenmore Receives Help Preserving Saint Edward Seminary

    City of Kenmore receives help preserving Saint Edward Seminary Aug 1, 2014 The city of Kenmore is working with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and Daniels Real Estate to preserve, rehabilitate and activate the former Saint Edward Seminary building. — image credit: Sarah Kehoe, Bothell Reporter The city of Kenmore is working with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission and Daniels Real Estate to preserve, rehabilitate and activate the former Saint Edward Seminary building. The state parks commission discussed the project with city representatives at a July 23 work session in Bellingham. The iconic building, which is on the National Register of Historic Places, is located at Saint Edward State Park in Kenmore and has been largely vacant since 1976. “Saving the historic seminary building in a way that promotes sustainability and environmental values, while enhancing the local economy, is a huge opportunity for the city, and we are ready to be a helpful partner in this effort,” Kenmore Mayor David Baker said. “The team that has stepped forward is truly high caliber with strong community ties, as well as national prominence.” In response to the Washington State Parks Commission’s Resolution in 2013, which directed state parks staff to explore partnerships with other public and private sector entities to rehabilitate and preserve the building, the city of Kenmore is proposing to play an active role with state parks to ensure a long-term lease to rehabilitate and reuse the building. This could include the formation of a Public Development Authority. A similar agreement was formed in 2013 when the Washington State Parks Commission approved a lease with a Public Development Authority chartered by the city of Port Townsend for a portion of Fort Worden State Park in Jefferson County.
  • Saint Edward State Park Seminary – Economic Feasibility Study

    Saint Edward State Park Seminary – Economic Feasibility Study

    Saint Edward State Park Seminary Economic Feasibility Study of Potential Public and Nonprofit Uses July 2016 Report to the Legislature Brian Bonlender, Director Acknowledgements Washington State Department of Commerce Jaime Rossman, Policy Advisor, External Relations Amber Siefer, Project Manager/Writer, Research Services Buck Lucas, Research Assistant, Research Services Jonathan Rose Companies, LLC Kristin Neil Ryan, Managing Director/Editor Ben Broesamle, Project Manager/Writer Amber Siefer, [email protected] Washington State Department of Commerce 1011 Plum St. SE P.O. Box 42525 Olympia, WA 98504-2525 www.commerce.wa.gov For people with disabilities, this report is available on request in other formats. To submit a request, please call 360-725-4000 (TTY 360-586-0772). Saint Edward State Park Seminary Economic Feasibility Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 5 Historic Preservation Considerations ........................................................................................... 8 Saint Edward State Park Seminary Building .............................................................................
  • Letters to State Parks Regarding the Seminary September 3, 2011 1

    Letters to State Parks Regarding the Seminary September 3, 2011 1

    Letters to State Parks Regarding the Seminary September 3, 2011 Note: names, outside of public officials, have been removed for privacy. First things first: * I support extending the one-year extension for consideration of rehab proposals for the seminary at St. Edward State Park. * If a citizens advisory committee is formed, I volunteer to be a member…”qualifications” below. I attended the public meeting held in Kenmore on August 25. A decade ago, when McMenamins submitted their proposal, I attended those meetings in support of it. I learned soooo much about the seminary (the park staff gave tours at the time), both from a building perspective, i.e., internal storm water collection system, and the people’s stories that went with it. A brother-in-law even attended school/seminary there. Mostly, I heard a vocal unreasonable opposition to the plan. A lawyer/bicyclist who was part of that group (and who was citing RCWs at the recent meeting) was particularly aggressive. In fact, I made my way to Normandy Park one snowy day for a commission hearing and he was there; he had the audacity to say to me, “I can’t believe you are still coming to these meetings,” suggesting, I suppose, that my support for the McMenamins was a lost cause. I believe the citizens of Kenmore woke up and realized what a gem they lost (thanks, in part, to the McMenamins construction in nearby Bothell) and turned out in force on August 25th to support the most recent turn of events. I was thrilled! And Daniels Real Estate appears to be just the right developer to take on this project in the vacuum left by the McMenamin brothers.
  • 2019-21 Capital Budget Proposed Compromise 2020 Local and Community Projects (Dollars in Thousands)

    2019-21 Capital Budget Proposed Compromise 2020 Local and Community Projects (Dollars in Thousands)

    Capital Budget Proposed Compromise Senate Floor Striking Amendment to SHB 1102 (S-4578.1/19) April 27, 2019 Senate Committee Services Office of Program Research Debt Limit Washington State has a constitutional debt limit. The State Treasurer may not issue any bonds that would cause the debt service (principal and interest payments) on any new and existing bonds to exceed this limit. Under a constitutional amendment approved by the voters in 2012, the state debt limit is currently 8.25 percent of the average of the prior six years’ general state revenues, defined as all unrestricted state tax revenues. This limit is reduced to 8 percent beginning on July 1, 2034. Bond Capacity A model administered by the State Treasurer’s Office is used to calculate the available bond capacity for the current budgeting period and for future biennial planning purposes. The model calculates the actual debt service on outstanding bonds and is used to estimate future debt service based on certain assumptions including revenue growth, interest rates, rate of repayment, rate of bond issuance, and other factors. For the 2019–21 biennium, projected bond capacity is $3.2 billion. This bond capacity incorporates the 2019 March Economic and Revenue forecast and estimated increases in general state revenue from legislative actions. In addition, there is capacity remaining from bonds previously authorized, including from the Streamflow Restoration program, from the 2018 Supplemental Capital Budget, and from adjusting funding in the 2019 Supplemental Capital Budget. Appropriations for 2019–21 and 2019 Supplemental Budget After the enacted 2018 Supplemental Capital Budget, there was $10.8 million in bond capacity remaining.
  • New Hotel Breaks Ground in Kenmore's Saint Edward Park

    New Hotel Breaks Ground in Kenmore's Saint Edward Park

    New hotel breaks ground in Kenmore’s Saint Edward Park The old seminary building in the park will be preserved and turned into a lodge, opening in 2020. By Katie Metzger, December 12, 2018 To mark a milestone in its restoration and renovation of the seminary building at Saint Edward State Park in Kenmore, Daniels Real Estate LLC held a ceremonial groundbreaking near the site on Dec. 7. Washington State Parks and Recreation commissioners were in attendance, as well as local elected officials and project partners, from Bastyr University and the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation to the city of Kenmore and the Bothell Kenmore Chamber of Commerce. Ken Bounds, chair of the State Parks commission, and Kevin Daniels, president of Daniels Real Estate, acknowledged the many years of work and advocacy that led to the day’s celebration. Daniels had to work on many levels, from neighborhood meetings to hearings in Olympia, on his plan to turn the seminary building into a hotel and spa while maintaining its historic character. “It wasn’t a simple journey, and it wasn’t an easy task,” Daniels said. “You may not realize how tough this was from the beginning, because it’s a new idea to do something in the middle of a state park.” Bounds noted that the seminary building was “literally falling apart” and “being terribly underutilized,” and State Parks had to make a choice about what to do with it. The agency is responsible for more than 700 historic structures, but is operating with less general fund revenue than it used to.

  • City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 26, 2016 Kenmore City Hall, Council Chambers 18120 68Th Ave

    City of Kenmore City of Kenmore - 18120 68th Avenue NE - P.O. Box 82607 - Kenmore, WA 98028 Phone: 425-398-8900 - Fax: 425-481-3236 - E-mail: [email protected] City of Kenmore City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 7:00 p.m., Monday, September 26, 2016 Kenmore City Hall, Council Chambers 18120 68th Ave. NE, Kenmore, WA 98028 If you have any questions or to confirm agenda items prior to the meeting, or if you require special accommodations, please call the City Clerk at 425-398-8900. You may also stop by City Hall at 18120 68th Avenue NE, Kenmore. Council agendas are also available on our website at www.kenmorewa.gov. I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. FLAG SALUTE IV. AGENDA APPROVAL V. PRESENTATION A. Recognition of 10 Years of Service to the City - Andrew Bauer Certificate VI. PROCLAMATION A. Domestic Violence Awareness Month - October 2016 Proclamation VII. CITIZEN COMMENTS A. This is an opportunity to express your views on issues that are important to you and to the community. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes. VIII. CONSENT AGENDA A. The following checks and electronic payments are approved for payment: Total Check Numbers 35165 through 35251 in the amount of $737,608.19 Total Payroll Electronic Deposits Dated 09/02/2016 in the amount of $80,371.92 Checks & Electronic Payments City of Kenmore - City Council Meeting Agenda for September 26, 2016 Page 2 of 69 B. Contract No. 14-C1322 Amendment No. 2, Corey Hansen, Business Incubator Consultant Agenda Bill & Attachments IX. BUSINESS AGENDA A.
  • Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area

    Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area

    APPENDIX G Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area November 2014 Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement This appendix lists and illustrates the parks and recreation facilities in the Plan area based on available geographic information systems (GIS) data. GIS data sources were as follows: • Snohomish County • King County • Pierce County • City of Everett • City of Mountlake Terrace • City of Redmond • City of Lake Forest Park This information was not verified in the field and parks and recreation facility representatives were not contacted to determine ownership or the recreational uses associated with these resources. Over 1,300 parks and recreation facilities were listed in the available GIS database including a wide variety of open space areas, sports fields, trails, and water- oriented facilities. The park or recreation facility ID numbers in Table G-1 correspond to those ID numbers in Figure G-1 and Figure G-2. The fact that a facility is listed in this appendix is not intended to suggest that the facility is subject to Section 4(f) protection. Section 4(f) does not apply to every park or recreation facility so this list is deliberately more extensive than would be a list of resources covered by that statute (which also covers properties other than parks and recreation facilities that are not listed here). The determination of whether a resource is entitled to protection under Section 4(f) involves a number of factors including, but not limited to, the facility’s background and purpose, its significance, and whether it has been reserved for a future transportation facility.
  • E Mass of Reception of the Most Reverend Paul D

    E Mass of Reception of the Most Reverend Paul D

    e Mass of Reception of the Most Reverend Paul D. Etienne as Coadjutor Archbishop of Seattle The Most Reverend J. Peter Sartain Archbishop of Seattle Presider St. James Cathedral, Seattle 7 June 2019 2:00pm His Holiness Pope Francis e Most Reverend Christophe Pierre Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America e Most Reverend J. Peter Sartain Archbishop of Seattle The Most Reverend Paul D. Etienne Coadjutor Archbishop of Seattle Archbishop Etienne’s Motto comes from the Letter of St. Paul to the Ephesians 4:15: “Rather, living the truth in love, we should grow in every way into him who is the head, Christ.” As Church, we believe Christ is the ultimate expression of truth as well as the ultimate expression and experience of love. As one sent by Christ, I ask for his blessing as we begin this next chapter of faith together. When Christ sent his first disciples, he told them to take nothing with them for the journey. This was because he was to be their sole possession. May we rely only and always upon Christ. Archbishop Etienne's Coat of Arms: The exterior is the traditional “framing” of a bishop’s coat of arms. An archbishop’s arms have 10 tassels on each side to represent his office. The sword represents St. Paul, Archbishop Etienne’s patron, and the book represents the Sacred Scriptures and preaching. The M is for Archbishop Etienne’s devotion to the Blessed Mother. The Sun (star) symbolizes Christ, the Dawn from on High, as well as Archbishop Etienne’s general love of the outdoors.
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers

    Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers

    G4212 PACIFIC AND MOUNTAIN STATES. REGIONS, G4212 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .G7 Great Basin [geological basin] .I3 Idaho and California Stage Road 1502 G4222 ROCKY MOUNTAIN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G4222 FEATURES, ETC. .B4 Bear River [ID, UT & WY] .B6 Bonneville, Lake .C3 Caribou National Forest .C35 Caribou-Targhee National Forest .C65 Continental Divide National Scenic Trail .G7 Green River .G72 Green River Formation .M3 Mancos Shale .R6 Rocky Mountains 1503 G4232 PACIFIC STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, G4232 ETC. .C3 Cascade Range .C55 Coast Ranges .C6 Coasts .I5 Interstate 5 .P3 Pacific Crest Trail 1504 G4242 PACIFIC NORTHWEST. REGIONS, NATURAL G4242 FEATURES, ETC. .B45 Belt Supergroup .C62 Columbia River .I5 Inland Empire .K3 Kaniksu National Forest .K6 Kootenai River .N4 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .P46 Pend Oreille River .S6 Snake River [Wyo.-Wash.] .S62 Snake River [wild & scenic river] 1505 G4252 MONTANA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G4252 .A2 Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness [MT & WY] .A23 Absaroka Range [MT & WY] .A6 Anaconda Pintler Wilderness .A63 Andesite Mountain .A8 Ashley Lake State Recreation Area .B12 Baker, Lake [Fallon County] .B126 Baker Watershed Dam .B13 Bannack State Park .B17 Bannock Pass .B2 Bearpaw Mountains .B25 Bearpaw Ski Area .B28 Bearpaw State Recreation Area .B29 Beartooth Mountains [MT & WY] .B3 Beartooth Plateau .B35 Beartooth State Recreation Area .B4 Beaverhead National Forest .B42 Beaverhead River .B423 Beavertail Hill State Recreation Area .B425 Beef Trail Ski Area .B432 Benton Lake National