Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Plan Area
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Parks and Recreation
PARKS AND RECREATION Parks and Recreation Overview of Facilities and Programs The Department of Parks and Recreation manages 400 parks and open areas in its approximately 6,200 acres of property throughout the City, works with the public to be good stewards of the park system, and provides safe and welcoming opportunities for the public to play, learn, contemplate, and build community. The park system comprises about 10% of the City’s land area; it includes 485 buildings, 224 parks, 185 athletic fields, 122 children's play areas, 24 community centers, 151 outdoor tennis courts, 22 miles of boulevards, an indoor tennis center, two outdoor and eight indoor swimming pools, four golf courses, studios, boat ramps, moorage, fishing piers, trails, camps, viewpoints and open spaces, a rock climbing site, a conservatory, a classical Japanese garden, and a waterfront aquarium. The development of this system is guided by the Seattle Parks & Recreation Plan 2000, the 38 neighborhood plans, the Joint Athletic Facilities Development Program with the Seattle School District, the 1999 Seattle Center and Community Centers Levy, the 2000 Parks Levy, and DPR’s annual update to the Major Maintenance Plan. 2000 Parks Levy In November 2000, Seattle voters approved a $198.2 million levy lid lift for Parks and Recreation. The levy closely follows the plan forged by the Pro Parks 2000 Citizens Planning Committee. The levy is designed to fund more than 100 projects to improve maintenance and enhance programming of existing parks, including the Woodland Park Zoo; acquire, develop and maintain new neighborhood parks, green spaces, playfields, trails and boulevards; and add out-of-school and senior activities. -
A Driving Force
N011V&Then byPaulDorpat T H E N : A caravan of motorcars featuring the Seattle Press Club in at least one pennant proceeds north past Mount Baker on a new Lake Washington Boulevard. The lakeshore was considerably changed in 1916 when the lake was lowered for the opening of the Lake Washington Ship Canal. NOW: Cars still make the scenic loop along the lake. A Driving Force 0 5 the parkway the Olmsted Brothers envisioned ~ ~~~~~!~~;~rs~ ~~e ~a~~~~~e~~~~~e~~ when they planned the city's parks and boule gers or even the occasion that prompted such vards in the early 20th century. Their highest a long caravan to snake along Lake Wash ambitions were to purchase the entire west ington Boulevard through the Mount Baker side of the lake up to the ridge between Col cutves and into Colman Park. man and Leschi parks and carry the boulevard I do, however, speculate. The year may be to a scenic "crestline." Instead, the parkway 1909, when thispartofthe boulevard was new. was developed into a string of parks that often If so, then the motorcade is probably headed meanders with the boulevard. for the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition, which When the lake was lowered 9 feet in 1916, opened chat spring on the University of Wash the concrete and riprap seawalls were exposed. ington campus. Pieces of the boulevard were Here at Mount Baker the seawall was kept, and rushed to completion so processions like this a new, landscaped slope drops from it to the one could cover the distance from Wetmore shoreline. -
Appendix “F” Registry of Elapp Acquisitions
APPENDIX “F” REGISTRY OF ELAPP ACQUISITIONS REGISTRY OF ELAPP ACQUISITIONS Original JOINT ASSESSED JOINT FUNDING JUST VALUE AT PROJECT NAME PARCEL NAME / OWNER Site PURCHASE PRICE ACRES FUNDING VALUE AT TIME ACQ. DATE AMOUNT TIME OF SALE Ranking AGENCY OF SALE Alafia North Prong C. L. Knight (SWFWMD) B $2,512,500 923.4 SWFWMD $1,256,250 $221,152 $2,361,483 12/15/1994 Alafia North Prong Gooch Trust B $ 8,264,400 766.2 $3,064,440 $5,332,219 12/07/2006 Alafia Scrub Preserve William A. Read B $ 2,150,000 77.8 FCT $ 1,075,000 $ 1,324,805 $ 1,324,805 09/22/1998 Alafia South Prong Dr. Pruit (SWFWMD) B $ 3,958,700 1,277.0 SWFWMD $ 1,979,350 $ 417,946 $ 5,515,000 11/03/94 Hopewell Land Partners Alafia South Prong (SWFWMD) B $ 1,697,144 570.0 SWFWMD $ 848,572 $ 178,413 $ 2,304,204 08/26/1998 Alafia South Prong Jameson Parcel(SWFWMD) B $ 580,000 211.8 SWFWMD $ 290,000 $ 1,076,000 08/20/1999 Alafia South Prong Lane Property (SWFWMD) B $ 147,000 32.6 SWFWMD $ 73,500 $ 6,544 $ 6,544 01/09/1998 Alafia South Prong Marnie Property B $ 20,000 20.0 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 01/13/2006 Alafia South Prong Jordan b $ 96,000 6.0 $ 5,400 $ 5,400 05/01/2008 Alderman's Ford Preserve (FKA Alderman's Ford Joo Property (State) A $ 1,396,923 353.5 CARL $ 675,600 $ 81,303 $ 1,850,900 07/02/1993 Alderman's Ford Preserve (FKA Alderman's Ford West Property (State) A $ 237,000 76.4 CARL $ 118,500 $ 12,575 $ 300,730 04/10/1995 Alderman's Ford Preserve (FKA Alderman's Ford Sheldon Property (State) A $ 1,477,200 541.0 CARL $ 738,600 $ 37,229 $ 3,024,872 07/19/1990 Alderman's Ford South Hopewell Land Partners Prong Addition (SWFWMD) A $ 1,445,716 499.0 SWFWMD $ 722,858 $ 151,982 $ 1,962,841 08/26/1998 Alderman's Ford South McDonald Construction, Prong Addition Inc. -
History Summary Sand Point Peninsula
HISTORY SUMMARY SAND POINT PENINSULA PRE-EURO AMERICAN SETTLEMENT POST-WAR • Native American group associated with —hloo-weelth-AHBSH“ peoples inhabited • 1947, rumored that NAS Seattle to be closed due to creation of Air Force three longhouses along Wolf Bay, immediately south of Sand Point • 1950, station scheduled for deactivation, delayed due to Korean War th MID-1800S EXPLORATION • 1950, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service established research laboratory NE 65 St. • 1850, first likely Euro-American sighting of peninsula, name Sand Point used • 1952, base closed except for Naval Reserve activities late 1950s, rumors of jet • 1855, U.S. Government Land Office surveyed Sand Point aircraft use, requiring extended runways, jet fuel storage EURO-AMERICAN SETTLEMENT • 1965 - —Outdoor Recreation and Open Space Plan“, Seattle Park Department • 1868, William Goldmyer homesteaded 81 acres immediately south of Pontiac and Seattle Planning Commission, identified Naval Air Station for major park Bay development • 1886-90, shipyard, Pontiac Brick and Tile Company, Pontiac Post Office • 1969, main airstrip resurfaced and extended to 4,800 feet, estimated cost established northwest part of peninsula $500,000 • 1914, Pontiac Brick and Tile Company closed MILITARY TO CIVILIAN CONVERSION • 1910s to early 1920‘s, four families resided northwest portion of Sand Point • June 30, 1970, air station deactivated, all flight operations ended, surplus 347 • 1918 to 1926, Carkeek Park located on the northwestern part of peninsula acres EARLY AIRFIELD DEVELOPMENT • 1975, 196 acres of the station transferred to the City of Seattle for Sand Point • Late 1910s to 1920s King County acquired small farms on Sand Point peninsula Park • June 19, 1920, groundbreaking ceremony with symbolic tree cutting and first • 1975, Sand Point Park Master Plan, proposed 75-acre Sports Meadow, tennis aircraft landing, station size 400 acres courts; neighborhood park, maintenance complex, and restaurant. -
R Egion Al T Rails S Ystem Trailfinder
Burke-Gilman Trail Elliott Bay Trail Snoqualmie Valley Trail Interurban Trail (North) Cedar River Trail he Regional Trails System in King County contains over 40 unique trails offering some 300 miles of distinc- tive greenways and off-street routes that allow travel from the Puget Sound to the Surface and Grade Soft-surface with a gentle grade that Surface and Grade Paved with a flat grade, follows follows the route of the historic Milwaukee Road railroad with Surface and Grade Paved with a gentle grade, follows Surface and Grade Paved for its first 12 miles until Cascade Mountains. Defined primarily by the route of the historic Seattle, Lake Shore and Eastern a 2.5-mile on-street detour around the Snoqualmie Mill site. the route of the historic Seattle-Everett Interurban Railway intersecting the Green-to-Cedar Rivers Trail and continues wide, paved trails or hard gravel paths Railway along Lake Union and Lake Washington. Surface and Grade Paved and flat, with a separate Length 31 miles, travels through the Snoqualmie Valley that operated in the early part of the 20th Century. as a soft-surface trail for its last 5 miles to Landsburg Park. Length 20 miles, stretches from Seattle to Bothell and pedestrian walking path that follows the trail through from Duvall to North Bend and on to Rattlesnake Lake Length 5 miles, links Seattle and Shoreline north to Length 17 miles, follows the gentle grade of the historic with gentle grades, they are perfect op- links with the Sammamish River Trail forming part of the Myrtle Edwards Park. -
Active Mobile Home Parks for All Counties (ACT = Active MH Parks) Limited Park Information - Agent Licensed Mobile Home Parks for All Counties (OTH = Agent Licensed)
Park License Status Park Id Park Name Park Address1 Park Address2 Park City Park Zip County Park Phone Number of Sites Owner Name State Code Limited Park Informantion - Active Mobile Home Parks for all Counties (ACT = Active MH Parks) Limited Park Information - Agent Licensed Mobile Home Parks for All Counties (OTH = Agent Licensed) 61440 ALLENS MOBILE PARK HWY 13 ADAMS WI 53910 ADAMS 4 ALLEN LOUISE C (608) 339- 60417 BEAVERS MOBILE HOME PARK 2406 HWY 13 LOT 1 ADAMS WI 53910 ADAMS 11 ROBERT & BETTY TORSTENSON ACT 6493 CASTLE ROCK LAKE MOTEL/MH & RV (608) 339- 60415 2301 CO HWY Z FRIENDSHIP WI 53934 ADAMS 21 TERRENCE & PATRICIA BYRON ACT PARK 3533 60962 CLZ 1937 CUMBERLAND ARKDALE WI 54613 ADAMS 3 CLELAND CLIFF LINDBERG C C (815) 463- 99025 DELLS HYDEAWAY 3772 - 9TH AVE WISCONSIN DELLS WI 53965 ADAMS 8 DOMINIC & LORI SIRIANN ACT 0750 (608) 586- 192 DRISCOLL'S MOBILE HOME PARK 3085 W 10TH DR GRAND MARSH WI 53936 ADAMS 16 DAMON DRISCOLL act 5500 (608) 339- 23 EDGEWOOD MOBILE ESTATES 1154 EDGEWOOD DR ADAMS WI 539109739 ADAMS 45 RAY FOSTER & MARIE FOSTER act 3717 (608) 339- 61540 FOSTERS MOBILE HOME PARK 2380 HWY 13 ADAMS WI 53910 ADAMS 25 RAY & MARIE FOSTER ACT 3717 60903 MOBILE HOME PARK TOWNSHIP OF EASTON ADAMS WI 53910 ADAMS 2 GAMROTH FRED C (715) 424- 82 OAKWOOD 1752 E COUNTY ROAD Z ARKDALE WI 54613 ADAMS 12 EDWARDLAWRENCE LLC act 1500 (608) 432- 99013 PRESTON PINES 1814 STATE ROAD 13 FRIENDSHIP WI 53934 ADAMS 19 NORTHRIDGE PROPERTIES LLC ACT 2848 (608) 339- 99029 RABL'S PINEQUILIZER PARK 1026 Cty Rd M, Lot 44 Adams WI 53910 ADAMS 42 -
AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting
AGENDA Finance Committee Meeting 3:30 PM - Monday, August 13, 2018 Council Conference Room, 7th Floor, City Hall – 1055 S. Grady Way 1. Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal a) AB - 2184 Administrative Services Department requests authorization to execute the En Point Technology purchase order in the amount of $157,730.17 for the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up. 2. Consortium Fiber Optic Project 73 Eastside Rail Corridor Feasibility Study a) AB - 2187 Administrative Services Department requests approval to execute Consortium Project Agreement 73, an interlocal agreement with the members of the Community Connectivity Consortium, regarding the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) fiber optic feasibility study. City of Renton share of the cost is $10,000. 3. Vouchers a) Accounts Payable b) Benefits' Deductions c) Payroll (located in Dropbox) 4. Emerging Issues in Finance AGENDA ITEM #1. a) AB - 2184 City Council Regular Meeting - 06 Aug 2018 SUBJECT/TITLE: Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up Renewal RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Finance Committee DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services Department STAFF CONTACT: Mehdi Sadri, Information Technology Director EXT.: 6886 FISCAL IMPACT SUMMARY: As part of the 2017/2018 Budget, Council approved funds for the yearly renewal of IT's Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-up renewal in the amount of $143,391.06 plus tax for a total of $157,730.17. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As part of the 2017/2018 IT Budget, Council approved funds for IT's yearly renewal of the Microsoft Enterprise Licenses True-Up. Yearly cost is $143,391 plus 10% sales tax for a total of $157,730.17. IT requests authorization to renew. -
Carkeek Park
CARKEEK PARK FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Update 2007 2 This Forest Management Plan is dedicated to Nancie Hernandez in grateful appreciation for 13 years of Park Maintenance and volunteer guidance. LAN Front cover photos taken in subunits: 4 B 1 C 1 B 3 A 1 C 3 CARKEEK PARK FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Created by Peter Noonan, March – December 2002 Updated by Lex Voorhoeve, December 2005 – November 2007 Prepared for: • Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation • Carkeek Park Advisory Council Funding sources: Carkeek Park Advisory Council Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Unit Seattle Department of Neighborhoods Matching Fund NOTE Like any forest management plan, this is a dated document, now describing the situation by the end of 2007. Over the next ten years big changes are expected in the Carkeek forest, particularly due to the over-mature Alder/Maple forest declining. Updating this document in response to those changes will likely need to occur every five years. RECOMMENDATION The non-forested units in Carkeek Park include unique wetland and riparian habitat, valuable to salmon and other wildlife. A management plan to address those units would make an excellent companion to this document. Diagrams by Peter Noonan Maps by Dale Johnson Photos and drawings by Lex Voorhoeve Plant Palettes, Appendix 5, completed by Doug Gresham Photo 1. Jacobo switchback between subunits 1B and 1C, installed by the Parks Trails Program; volunteer crew led by Jacobo Jimenez. 4 Figure 1. Carkeek Park Trails Map 5 SUMMARY 7 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. BACKGROUND 8 HISTORY 8 PARK USE 8 PHYSICAL NATURE 8 SOIL STRATIFICATION 9 LANDSLIDES 9 SEDIMENTATION 10 FORESTS 10 A SHORT HISTORY 10 PRESENT DAY 11 RED ALDER STANDS 13 BIG LEAF MAPLE / RED ALDER STANDS 14 DECIDUOUS / CONIFEROUS MIXED STANDS 15 CONIFEROUS STANDS 15 WILDLIFE 15 MIGRATORY BIRDS 15 RESIDENT SPECIES 16 3. -
The Artists' View of Seattle
WHERE DOES SEATTLE’S CREATIVE COMMUNITY GO FOR INSPIRATION? Allow us to introduce some of our city’s resident artists, who share with you, in their own words, some of their favorite places and why they choose to make Seattle their home. Known as one of the nation’s cultural centers, Seattle has more arts-related businesses and organizations per capita than any other metropolitan area in the United States, according to a recent study by Americans for the Arts. Our city pulses with the creative energies of thousands of artists who call this their home. In this guide, twenty-four painters, sculptors, writers, poets, dancers, photographers, glass artists, musicians, filmmakers, actors and more tell you about their favorite places and experiences. James Turrell’s Light Reign, Henry Art Gallery ©Lara Swimmer 2 3 BYRON AU YONG Composer WOULD YOU SHARE SOME SPECIAL CHILDHOOD MEMORIES ABOUT WHAT BROUGHT YOU TO SEATTLE? GROWING UP IN SEATTLE? I moved into my particular building because it’s across the street from Uptown I performed in musical theater as a kid at a venue in the Seattle Center. I was Espresso. One of the real draws of Seattle for me was the quality of the coffee, I nine years old, and I got paid! I did all kinds of shows, and I also performed with must say. the Civic Light Opera. I was also in the Northwest Boy Choir and we sang this Northwest Medley, and there was a song to Ivar’s restaurant in it. When I was HOW DOES BEING A NON-DRIVER IMPACT YOUR VIEW OF THE CITY? growing up, Ivar’s had spokespeople who were dressed up in clam costumes with My favorite part about walking is that you come across things that you would pass black leggings. -
National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Seattle’s Olmsted Parks and Boulevards (1903–68) B. Associated Historic Contexts None C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Chrisanne Beckner, MS, and Natalie K. Perrin, MS organization: Historical Research Associates, Inc. (HRA) street & number: 1904 Third Ave., Suite 240 city/state/zip: Seattle, WA 98101 e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] telephone: (503) 247-1319 date: December 15, 2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. -
City of Seattle Edward B
City of Seattle Edward B. Murray, Mayor Finance and Administrative Services Fred Podesta, Director July 25, 2016 The Honorable Tim Burgess Seattle City Hall 501 5th Ave. Seattle, WA 98124 Councilmember Burgess, Attached is an annual report of all real property under City ownership. The annual review supports strategic management of the City’s real estate holdings. Because City needs change over time, the annual review helps create opportunities to find the best municipal use of each property or put it back into the private sector to avoid holding properties without an adopted municipal purpose. Each January, FAS initiates the annual review process. City departments with jurisdiction over real property assure that all recent acquisitions and/or dispositions are accurately represented, and provide current information about each property’s current use, and future use, if identified. Each property is classified based on its level of utilization -- from Fully Utilized Municipal Use to Surplus. In addition, in 2015 and 2016, in conjunction with CBO, OPI, and OH, FAS has been reviewing properties with the HALA recommendation on using surplus property for housing. The attached list has a new column that groups excess, surplus, underutilized and interim use properties into categories to help differentiate the potential for various sites. Below is a matrix which explains the categorization: Category Description Difficult building site Small, steep and/or irregular parcels with limited development opportunity Future Use Identified use in the future -
Local Places to Visit Around Seattle
Eastside Literacy Talk Time Spring 2006 Talk Time Topic: Local Places to Visit around Seattle Let’s get started… Take a few minutes to think of a local place that you visited. • Where did you go, and what did you do? • Who went with you? (friends, family, etc.) • How much did it cost? • Would you recommend this place to others? Why or why not? Background: Many people go to coffee shops (Starbucks is a favorite destination) or shopping when they have cabin fever. At other times, they want a longer trip or a change of scenery so they take a day trip. Families, couples, and people of all ages enjoy seeing or doing something new. The Seattle area offers many different types of things to do and see close to home. It is possible to take a ferry, drive to the mountains, and visit the Pike Place Market all in the same day! Spend 5 minutes asking each other the following questions. Interview 2-3 people about any local trips that they have taken. Work with your Talk Time leader to complete the grid below. Share your results with the group. Name Where did you go? What did you see? Would you go again? Discussion Questions: What places would you like to visit? How can you find out more about the cost, the transportation and any other questions you might have? What activities do you enjoy doing? Do you prefer indoor or outdoor activities? What did you do in your country? Did you take local trips? Where did you go? Did you take trips in Winter? Spring? Summer? Fall? Why? Some outings are “kid friendly” and others are not.