DOCSLIB.ORG

Burlington-Essex Phase IA Executive Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burlington-Essex Phase IA Executive Summary BURLINGTON-ESSEX CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE 1A REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHITTENDEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Submitted by: DMJM+HARRIS In association with: R.L. Banks & Associates, Inc. AECOM Consulting Transportation Group Resource Systems Group, Inc. Third Sector Associates August 2001 AN AECOM COMPANY The People Who Get It Done Burlington-Essex Alternatives Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 Recommendations .............................................................................................. ES-1 ES-1.1 Transportation Systems Management ...................................................................... ES-1 ES-1.2 Highway.................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES-1.3 Bus ........................................................................................................................... ES-2 ES-1.4 Commuter Rail.......................................................................................................... ES-2 ES-1.5 Costs of Recommended Alternative.......................................................................... ES-5 ES-2 Introduction.......................................................................................................... ES-6 ES-2.1 Study Background .................................................................................................... ES-6 ES-2.2 Corridor Definition..................................................................................................... ES-7 ES-3 Purpose and Need for Study .............................................................................. ES-9 ES-3.1 Growth in Population and Employment ..................................................................... ES-9 ES-3.2 Changing Travel Conditions.................................................................................... ES-10 ES-4 Study Process.................................................................................................... ES-11 ES-5 Alternatives........................................................................................................ ES-12 ES-5.1 No-Build.................................................................................................................. ES-12 ES-5.2 Transportation Systems Management Alternative................................................... ES-14 ES-5.3 Highway.................................................................................................................. ES-15 ES-5.4 Commuter Rail........................................................................................................ ES-18 ES-5.5 Express Bus ........................................................................................................... ES-22 ES-6 Comparative Analysis ....................................................................................... ES-25 ES-6.1 Transportation Performance ................................................................................... ES-25 ES-6.2 Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................... ES-25 ES-6.3 Land Use Impacts................................................................................................... ES-30 ES-6.4 Costs ...................................................................................................................... ES-30 August 31, 2001 Table of Contents i Burlington-Essex Alternatives Analysis Executive Summary Chittenden County is expected to grow and prosper over the course of the next 25 years. Population in the county is projected to increase by 44% and employment by 56%. However, this development will have its price. Traffic is projected to increase at a faster rate than either population or jobs, resulting in a 20% decline in average countywide travel speeds. The increased traffic will also mean greater congestion. The amount of peak hour travel done in congested conditions is expected to increase from its current level of 5.5% to 25.8% in 2025. The Burlington-Essex corridor is an important transportation corridor in the county. Currently, 42% of trips made in the county begin or end in the corridor. Travel conditions in the corridor are currently worse than those in the county as a whole, and are projected to worsen at a more rapid rate than those in the rest of the county. Travel speeds today are less than half of the county average, and congested peak hour vehicle miles (VMT) are 9.7%, versus 5.5% countywide. By 2025, average travel speeds in the corridor are projected to decline to 8.5 miles per hour, and congested peak hour VMT to increase to 35.9%. The Chittenden County MPO initiated the Burlington-Essex Alternatives Analysis to explore alternatives for addressing transportation problems in the corridor using a variety of transportation modes. This report summarizes the analysis, conclusions and recommendations of that effort. ES-1 Recommendations Based on the evaluation performed for the Burlington-Essex Corridor Alternatives Analysis, it is clear that a single modal alternative does not address the transportation needs of the corridor and goals of the region. A multimodal mix of improvements appears to present the best opportunity to improve transportation in the corridor. These improvements have been evaluated preliminarily as part of this alternatives analysis. Further work is needed in order to develop and refine each improvement to a level where the scope of the improvement is defined in detail, and the full costs and benefits are established. Subsequent to that project development effort, engineering could proceed. ES-1.1 Transportation Systems Management The TSM improvements that were studied improved traffic operations to an acceptable level of service at all key intersections, with the exception of Five Corners. It is recommended that these improvements be implemented. Improvements include signalization of E. Spring St. at VT 15, addition of a second left turn lane at Lime Kiln Road, and improvements to signal timing along the length of the corridor. It is also recommended that fifteen-minute service in peak hours be implemented on CCTA Route #2, with close monitoring of ridership, on-time performance and costs, to further assess the viability of this alternative. August 31, 2001 Executive Summary ES-1 Burlington-Essex Alternatives Analysis ES-1.2 Highway TSM-type highway improvements were not adequate to bring the critical intersection at Five Corners in Essex Junction to an acceptable level of service. Preliminary analysis indicated that a roundabout has the potential to provide an excellent level of service for motor vehicles at that location. However, a roundabout may present an unacceptable condition for bicycles and pedestrians. Engineering and urban design efforts are needed to develop the roundabout concept to a level where the benefits and impacts can by fully evaluated. If a roundabout is not found to be feasible or acceptable to the community, further analysis is required to develop a viable solution to traffic delays at Five Corners. The new highway facilities evaluated had benefits for the corridor in terms of additional access, and fairly evenly balanced impacts in terms of addition and subtraction of traffic. They did not result in significant improvement in corridor-level highway operations. Greater benefits could be obtained by implementing the TSM Alternatives. However, this study did not evaluate the full potential benefits and costs of these new facilities in the regional context. As these improvements—the Circumferential Highway, a full interchange at Exit 15, and a new road through Camp Johnson—originated from efforts outside this alternatives analysis, it is recommended that the concepts be developed further through separate analysis, such as the update of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. ES-1.3 Bus Improvements to bus service have the potential to draw people from cars to public transit, and to create a transit-oriented mentality on the part of travelers. In the evaluation, the bus system improvements resulted in only small increases in ridership, but they did have some impact. Bus transit improvements were of two types: additional routes and express service. The express bus operations that were evaluated did not generate sufficient ridership to offset the relatively high capital and operating costs that they entailed. It is recommended that the potential benefits of additional routes in the corridor be evaluated further, particularly local routes in the area of Susie Wilson Rd./Kellogg Rd., and around US 2/US 7 north of I 89. If a commuter rail line is implemented in the corridor, bus feeder service will be critical to the success of the rail line. Further work is needed to define the bus service that would best complement the rail line, and to ensure its financial viability. ES-1.4 Commuter Rail The Commuter Rail Alternative demonstrated an ability to attract travelers to rail, and to increase transit mode share. The addition of service from Burlington to Essex has the effect of leveraging the investment in the Charlotte to Burlington line by increasing ridership beyond a straight passenger-per-additional-mile level. This demonstrated value of extending a rail network may also apply to the various other regional rail connections that are under study, and which would be complemented by the Burlington-Essex line. The addition of rail also expands the transportation options
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Rail Service the Vermont Way
    DRAFT Regional Rail Service The Vermont Way Authored by Christopher Parker and Carl Fowler November 30, 2017 Contents Contents 2 Executive Summary 4 The Budd Car RDC Advantage 5 Project System Description 6 Routes 6 Schedule 7 Major Employers and Markets 8 Commuter vs. Intercity Designation 10 Project Developer 10 Stakeholders 10 Transportation organizations 10 Town and City Governments 11 Colleges and Universities 11 Resorts 11 Host Railroads 11 Vermont Rail Systems 11 New England Central Railroad 12 Amtrak 12 Possible contract operators 12 Dispatching 13 Liability Insurance 13 Tracks and Right-of-Way 15 Upgraded Track 15 Safety: Grade Crossing Upgrades 15 Proposed Standard 16 Upgrades by segment 16 Cost of Upgrades 17 Safety 19 Platforms and Stations 20 Proposed Stations 20 Existing Stations 22 Construction Methods of New Stations 22 Current and Historical Precedents 25 Rail in Vermont 25 Regional Rail Service in the United States 27 New Mexico 27 Maine 27 Oregon 28 Arizona and Rural New York 28 Rural Massachusetts 28 Executive Summary For more than twenty years various studies have responded to a yearning in Vermont for a regional passenger rail service which would connect Vermont towns and cities. This White Paper, commissioned by Champ P3, LLC reviews the opportunities for and obstacles to delivering rail service at a rural scale appropriate for a rural state. Champ P3 is a mission driven public-private partnership modeled on the Eagle P3 which built Denver’s new commuter rail network. Vermont’s two railroads, Vermont Rail System and Genesee & Wyoming, have experience hosting and operating commuter rail service utilizing Budd cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Range Public Transportation Plan for Addison County Transit Resources Kfh Group, Inc
    SHORT-RANGE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR ADDISON COUNTY TRANSIT RESOURCES KFH GROUP, INC. I SHORT-RANGE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR ADDISON COUNTY TRANSIT RESOURCES Final Report March 21, 2003 Prepared for State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350. Bethesda, Maryland. (301) 951 -8660. FAX (301) 951-0026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION .................... ... .. .......... ......................................................... ... 1-1 Introduction ................................................................................. .... ............................. .......... 1-1 Purpose of Plans and Legislative Requirement.. ........... ........................... .. ............................ 1-2 Background ....... .. ................. ... ................................. .................................. ............ ..... ........... 1-3 Service Area ....................... .. .. .................................................................. ........... ................... 1-3 Goals for the SRPTP .......... .. .................... .......................... .... .................................. .. ............ 1-5 Previous Studies ... ....................................................... ... .. .. .... .............................. .. .. ............ 1-10 CHAPTER 2 - POPULATION PROFILE AND NEEDS ANALYSIS ...................... ................ 2-1 Population Profile .................... .. .................................................... .... ... ... ........ .....................
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY for BURLINGTON, VERMONT—A SMALL METRO CASE STUDY Tony Redington
    COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY FOR BURLINGTON, VERMONT—A SMALL METRO CASE STUDY Tony Redington Introduction This Burlington-Montpelier-Charlotte Commuter Rail Passenger Service (BMC Commuter Rail Service) study examines a small metro commuter rail service feasibility for Vermont. The concept dates from a 1989 report followed by a number of further analyses and actual service 2000-2003 on a portion of the route. Market potential for commuter rail becomes measurable with more confidence after a decade of commuter bus data and successful demand management experience. The “Link” commuter buses started 2003 and in 2014 total 60 each workday to and from Burlington along four corridors. The rail route analyzed here includes the 68 km east-west segment between Burlington and the Vermont State House in downtown Montpelier and the 19 km segment south from Burlington to Charlotte, the 2000- 2003 Champlain Flyer commuter route. The overall 87 km route evaluated, Map 1, extends from Charlotte via Burlington to State House with 12 stations, eight in town and city centers. U.S. and Canada Commuter Rail The twenty-five United States and three Canadian commuter rail passenger systems reveal an under- developed facet of North American surface transportation. A historic transportation travel change away from the auto in the U.S. includes: (1) the current seven year downturn of vehicle miles of travel (FHWA 2013); time in car travel dropping among all population groups (FHWA 2011, Figure 5), and perhaps most significant, the proportion of under-age-30 eligible with driver licenses dropped about 10% since 1995 (Sivak and Schoettle 2011). These factors call for re- examining commuter rail feasibility even in small metropolitan areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Executive Summary
    City of Burlington Waterfront Transportation Plan City of Burlington Waterfront Transportation Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................. 1 Background ........................................................................................................... 2 The Waterfront Urban Renewal Plan.................................................................. 4 Waterfront Parking, Pedestrian, and Circulation Study...................................... 5 - Parking.......................................................................................................... 5 - Traffic & Circulation.................................................................................... 6 The Plan ................................................................................................................. 9 Guiding Principles .............................................................................................. 9 Access ............................................................................................................... 10 Downtown Transit Center............................................................................. 11 Transportation Demand Management........................................................... 12 Parking .............................................................................................................. 15 On Street Parking.........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St. Albans Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study (Study) Examines the Feasibility of Implementing a Commuter Rail Service Between Montpelier and Burlington and St
    Feasibility Study Montpelier - St. Albans Commuter Rail Service February 2017 Acknowledgements Study Advisory Committee David Armstrong – Green Mountain Transit Charles Hunter – Genesee & Wyomong Railroad Services, Inc. Seldon Houghton / Mary Anne Michaels (Alternate) – Vermont Rail Systems Bethany Remmers – Northwest Regional Planning Commisssion Charles Baker – Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Bonnie Waninger – Central Vermont Regional Planning Commission Lisamarie Charlesworth – Franklin County Regional Chamber of Commerce Cathy Davis – Lake Champlain Regional Chamber of Commerce James Stewart – Central Vermont Economic Development Corporation Bill Moore – Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce Tim Smith – Franklin County Industrial Development Corportation Curt Carter – Greater Burlington Industrial Corporation Vermont Agency of Transportation Internal Working Group Joe Segale Costa Pappis Barbara Donovan Daniel Delabruere Michele Boomhower Study Management Team Scott Bascom – Vermont Agency of Transportation David Pelletier – Vermont Agency of Transportation Ronald O’Blenis – HDR, Inc. Matthew Moran – HDR, Inc. Alexander Tang – HDR, Inc. Katie Rougeot – HDR, Inc. Thanks to the many Vermont citizens who participated in the public meetings that helped shape this study. 1 Feasibility Study: Montpelier – St. Albans Commuter Rail Service Executive Summary The Montpelier to St. Albans Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study (Study) examines the feasibility of implementing a commuter rail service between Montpelier and Burlington and St. Albans and Burlington (Corridor). The goal of the study was to evaluate the capital costs, operating costs, and necessary conditions for operating a conceptual commuter rail system in Northwest Vermont. The study began as directive from the Vermont General Assembly, which stated that the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) shall “conduct a commuter rail feasibility study for the corridor between St.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rail: a National Perspective High-Speed Rail Experience in the United States
    High-Speed Rail: A National Perspective High-Speed Rail Experience in the United States A report prepared for National Railroad Passenger Corporation December 2008 High-Speed Rail: A National Perspective High-Speed Rail Experience in the United States final report prepared for National Railroad Passenger Corporation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with SYSTRA Consulting, Inc. December 2008 www.camsys.com final report High-Speed Rail: A National Perspective High-Speed Rail Experience in the United States prepared for National Railroad Passenger Corporation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 9015 Mountain Ridge, Suite 210 Austin, Texas 78759 with SYSTRA Consulting, Inc December 2008 High-Speed Rail: A National Perspective High-Speed Rail Experience in the United States Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Context for the Study............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Key Players............................................................................................................. 1-2 1.3 Process and Products of This Report.................................................................. 1-2 1.4 A Word about Definitions.................................................................................... 1-3 2.0
    [Show full text]
  • Champlain Path Feasibility Study
    Champlain Path Feasibility Study CONTENTS APPENDICIES Background--------------------------------------------- 2 Appendix A: Champlain Path Concept Plan -------------------10 Methodology ------------------------------------------- 2 Appendix B: Photographs ------------------------------------------24 Public and Agency Involvement ------------------- 3 Appendix C: Environmental Analysis ----------------------------28 Context -------------------------------------------------- 3 Appendix D: Archeological Resource Assessment ----------31 Trail Design--------------------------------------------- 3 Appendix E: Typical Cross Sections-----------------------------39 Recommendations------------------------------------ 3 Appendix F: Cost Analysis -----------------------------------------42 Trail Cost ------------------------------------------------ 8 TABLES Table 1: Trail Segments Table 2: Trail Segments Outside Railroad ROW Table 3: Estimated Trail Construction Cost Alta Planning + Design Champlain Path Feasibility Study 2 Background Also, Alta Planning + Design obtained the railroad valuation or ‘val’ plans from Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO). These val plans are a map of the The Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) contracted with rail corridor prepared in 1914. Included in the val plans are the railroad centerline with Alta Planning + Design to study the feasibility of constructing a shared use path for bicycles stationing every 1000 feet, the railroad right of way or boundary lines, drainage
    [Show full text]
  • Village of Essex Junction Trustees Regular Meeting
    VILLAGE OF ESSEX JUNCTION 2 Lincoln Street TRUSTEES Essex Junction, VT 05452 Tuesday, September 10, 2019 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA 6:30 PM E-mail: [email protected] www.essexjunction .org Phone: (802) 878-6944 1. CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG [6:30 PM] 2. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES 3. APPROVE AGENDA 4. PUBLIC TO BE HEARD a. Comments from Public on Items Not on Agenda 5. BUSINESS ITEMS a. Presentation of Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission annual report – Charlie Baker b. Review of grant application for re-location of the Burlington rail yard—Charlie Baker c. Approve purchase of landscape barriers at new Firebird Café location 6. CONSENT ITEMS a. Consider ordinance waivers for October 4th Essex High School Homecoming b. Consider request to Close or Obstruct a Street for Hawthorn Circle Annual Block party c. Approve minutes: August 27, 2019 d. Check Warrants #17162—08/30/19; #17163—09/06/19 7. READING FILE a. Board Member Comments b. Upcoming meeting schedule 8. EXECUTIVE SESSION a. An executive session is anticipated to discuss a personnel matter 9. ADJOURN This agenda is available in alternative formats upon request. Meetings of the Trustees, like all programs and activities of the Village of Essex Junction, are accessible to people with disabilities. For information on accessibility or this agenda, call the Unified Manager's office at 878-6944. Certification: _______________________09/06/2019 _________________ Date Posted Initials Page 1 of 1 Memorandum To: Board of Trustees; Evan Teich, Unified Manager Cc: Charles Baker, CCRPC Executive Director; Robin Pierce, Community Development Director From: Greg Duggan, Deputy Manager Re: Presentation of CCRPC annual report Date: September 6, 2019 Issue The issue is for the Trustees to receive the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission’s (CCRPC) annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Scale Planning and Capital Improvement Document Summary
    VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Materials & Research Section Research Report EFFICIENCY IN TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY AND STATE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY PLANNING IN VERMONT Report 2012 – 03 May 2012 EFFICIENCY IN TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY AND STATE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY PLANNING IN VERMONT Report 2012 – 03 May 2012 UVM TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH CENTER for STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION BRIAN R. SEARLES, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION CHRIS COLE, POLICY, PLANNING AND INTERMODAL DEVELOPMENT GINA CAMPOLI, ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY MANAGER Prepared By: UVM Transportation Research Center Jim Sullivan, M.S. Jennifer Kenyan Richard Watts, Ph.D. Transportation Research Center Farrell Hall 210 Colchester Avenue Burlington, VT 05405 Phone: (802) 656-1312 Website: www.uvm.edu/transportationcenter The information contained in this report was compiled for the use of the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). Conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based upon the research data obtained and the expertise of the researchers, and are not necessarily to be construed as Agency policy. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. VTrans assumes no liability for its contents or the use thereof. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 2012-03 - - - - - - 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EFFICIENCY IN TRANSPORTATION - May, 2012 COMMUNITY AND STATE TRANSPORTATION 6. Performing Organization Code EFFICIENCY PLANNING IN VERMONT 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jim Sullivan, M.S. Richard Watts, Ph.D. Jennifer Kenyan 2012-03 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. UVM School of Engineering 11. Contract or Grant No. Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering 213 Votey Building 33 Colchester Ave RSCH015 - 712 Burlington, VT 05405 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelburne Comprehensive Plan 2014
    ____________________________________________________________________________________ SHELBURNE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2014 VOLUME II DATA, BACKGROUND INFORMATION, AND ANALYSIS [As approved by Selectboard February 25th, 2014] ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ [Acknowledgements] [The significant and lasting contributions of all those who participated in the development of this Plan are hereby acknowledged,] ____________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. HISTORY 3 III. LAND AND ITS USE 7 IV. POPULATION 27 V. HOUSING 39 VI. ECONOMY 45 VII. TRANSPORTATION 51 VIII. COMMUNITY FACILITIES, UTILITIES, SERVICES 69 IX. EDUCATION 101 X. ENERGY 105 XI. PLAN COMPATIBILITY 113 Under separate cover Volume I Maps ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ Introduction I. INTRODUCTION The Shelburne Comprehensive Plan (“Plan”) is a policy document created to guide development and conservation in the Town. The Plan was created by a group of citizens who share deep respect for the Town's past, who understand present conditions and
    [Show full text]
  • Chittenden County Park-And-Ride & Intercept Facility Plan
    Chittenden County Park­and­Ride & Intercept Facility Plan Adopted June 15, 2011 DATA ANALYSIS SOLUTIONS Report Prepared for: The Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization, in cooperation with the Vermont Agency of Transportation. The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Report Prepared by: 60 Lake Street, Suite 1E, Burlington, Vermont 05401 TEL 802.383.0118 FAX 802.383.0122 www.rsginc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT PREPARED FOR: ........................................................................................ I REPORT PREPARED BY: .......................................................................................... I Chittenden County Park‐and‐Ride/Intercept Facility Plan Advisory Committee ............................................. iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................... 1 Long‐term Vision and Goals .............................................................................................................................. 1 Recommendations and Priorities ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CCMPO 2025 Metropolitan Transportation Plan
    2025 Chittenden County Metropolitan Transportation Plan Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Adopted January 19, 2005 Communities working together to meet Chittenden County’s transportation needs Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization 30 Kimball Ave., Suite 206 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 t 802-660-4071 f 802-660-4079 www.ccmpo.org/[email protected] The preparation of this document has been financed through transportation planning funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) and by matching funds provided by Chittenden County’s 18 municipalities, the Vermont Agency of Transportation, and the Chittenden County Transportation Authority. Prepared by: CCMPO Staff with assistance from Wilbur Smith Associates Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization CCMPO Board Robert Penniman – Chair, Jericho Jeff McDonald, Charlotte – Vice Chair Michael O’Brien, Winooski – Secretary-Treasurer Gerard Mullen, Bolton Tom Buckley, Westford William Keogh, Burlington George Gerecke, Williston Jeff McDonald, Charlotte Michael O’Brien, Winooski Chris Conant, Colchester Dawn Terrill, State of Vermont Jeff Carr, Essex Dale Arango, Essex Junction Ex-officio, non-voting Andrea Morgante, Hinesburg Chris Cole, CCTA Richard Moulton, Huntington Lewis Wetzel, CCRPC Robert Penniman, Jericho John Hamilton, Burlington Int’l Airport James Manley, Milton Mike Flaherty, Vermont Transportation Virginia Clarke, Richmond Authority Phil Beliveau, St. George Jerome Hebda, Vermont Railway Jim Dudley, Shelburne Christopher Jolly, FHWA Jim Condos, South Burlington Andrew Motter, FTA Stan Hamlet, Underhill CCMPO Staff Daryl Benoit, Transportation Planner William Knight, Executive Director Paul Craven, Project Manager David Roberts, Sr., Transportation Planner Bernadette Ferenc, Executive Assistant Susan Smichenko, Sr. Transportation Christine Forde, Sr.
    [Show full text]