Hunting for Micro Black Holes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hunting for Micro Black Holes University of Amsterdam Institute for Theoretical Physics Master’s Thesis Hunting for Micro Black Holes Author: Supervisor: Lucas Ellerbroek Prof. dr. Erik Verlinde October 30, 2009 Alice laughed. “There’s no use trying,” she said: “one can’t believe impossible things.” “I daresay you haven’t had much practice,” said the Queen. “When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass (And What Alice Found There), 1871 Cover illustration: Sir John Tenniel, “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland”, 1865 Abstract In braneworld scenarios, the visible universe is pictured as a brane embedded in a higher- dimensional compact space, through which only the gravitational field propagates. In these scenarios, gravity could be the dominant force at TeV-scale energies. The discovery of hidden dimensions would therefore be a major breakthrough in finding a solution to the hierarchy problem. A phenomenological consequence of these scenarios is that black holes can exist at energy scales as low as 1 TeV. This leads to predictions about black hole events at future LHC experiments, that would prove the existence of hidden dimensions. This possibility sparked a lot of discussion among scientists, and a lawsuit was filed by worried citizens, afraid to be accreted by this black hole. However, careful study of Hawking radiation of TeV-scale black holes indicates that they evaporate very rapidly. Also, the signature of the radiation spectrum will probably be obscured by other emission effects. This narrows the chances of observing a black hole in a detector. In this research, a model is proposed of the creation of a black hole within a hot quark-gluon plasma. Under certain conditions, the plasma could be partly absorbed by the black hole, thus extending its lifetime. This could improve the chances of detecting a microscopic black hole. Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Black holes in 4 dimensions 8 2.1 Formation ...................................... 8 2.1.1 Gravitational collapse ........................... 9 2.1.2 High-energy collisions ........................... 10 2.2 Properties ...................................... 13 2.2.1 The Unruh effect and Hawking radiation ................. 14 2.2.2 Superradiance ................................ 20 2.2.3 Schwinger discharge ............................ 22 2.3 Evaporation ..................................... 25 3 Braneworld scenarios 26 3.1 Motivation ..................................... 26 3.2 The ADD scenario ................................. 27 4Blackholesin4+n dimensions 32 4.1 Formation: high-energy collisions ......................... 32 4.2 Properties ...................................... 34 4.2.1 Schwarzschild radius ............................ 34 4.2.2 Hawking temperature ........................... 35 4.2.3 Greybody factors .............................. 36 4.3 Evaporation ..................................... 38 4.3.1 Balding phase ................................ 39 4.3.2 Spindown phase .............................. 40 4.3.3 Schwarzschild phase ............................ 40 4.3.4 Planck phase ................................ 44 4.3.5 Lifetime ................................... 44 5 Primordial black holes 46 5.1 Mass limits for PBHs in braneworld scenarios .................. 46 5.2 Primordial high-energy collisions ......................... 47 2 6 Black holes in the lab 51 6.1 The quark-gluon plasma .............................. 51 6.1.1 Creation ................................... 52 6.1.2 Cooling and Expansion .......................... 53 6.1.3 Hadronization ................................ 54 6.2 The QGP Absorption Model ........................... 54 6.2.1 Growth and decay ............................. 55 6.2.2 Numerical results .............................. 58 6.2.3 Theoretical Issues ............................. 64 6.2.4 The Gunfire Model ............................. 66 6.2.5 Feasibility .................................. 66 7 Conclusions 69 A Lorentz Force Lagrangian 72 B Emission coefficient for black holes with fixed mass 73 C Graphs 75 4 CONTENTS Notation The equations in this thesis are written in SI units unless specified otherwise. The reason for this is that the numerical results become more insightful. The following relation between the gravitational constant and the Planck mass is used: c G = 2 (0.1) Mpl The four-dimensional value of the Planck scale is denoted by Mpl.Foritshigher- dimensional equivalent the symbol M∗ is used. Chapter 1 Introduction With much anticipation, the scientific world watches the Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, where for the first time TeV-energies will be reached in particle experiments. Some theorists speculated (for example [1, 2, 3]) that one of the products created in these collisions might be a black hole. When these predictions were published, a big hype was spawn among scientists and non-scientists alike. The small black hole originally proposed became blown up to gargantuan proportions by the media. Headlines featured doomsday scenarios, and even a lawsuit was filed to pull financial support out of the project. Fortunately for the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the judge ruled that the Apocalypse lay ‘outside of her jurisdiction’. In the meanwhile, scientific evidence had been comprised by some of the leading theorists on this topic that there was nothing to worry about [4, 5]. The official safety assessment from CERN was endorsed by numerous leading physicists, including Stephen Hawking: The world will not come to an end when the LHC turns on. The LHC is absolutely safe. ... Collisions releasing greater energy occur millions of times a day in the earth’s atmosphere and nothing terrible happens [6]. Some questions that immediately come to mind are: how can black holes be fabricated at LHC? What will happen to them upon creation? Can they even be detected? These questions are the backbone of this thesis. To answer the first question: black holes are gravitational objects, so they can only exist at TeV-scales if gravity acted on this scale. And according to our current knowledge of nature, it does not. The relative weakness of gravity as opposed to the other three forces is called the hierarchy problem. It is one of the major outstanding problems in physics. Among its proposed solutions are theories called braneworld scenarios. In these scenarios, the scale of gravity, which is the Planck scale, is lowered down. This means that gravity becomes stronger on short distances than we would expect it to be ac- cording to Newtonian physics. This is explained by the existence of extra, hidden dimensions where only gravity propagates. Because some of the gravitational flux ‘leaks out’ to the extra dimensions, only a weak gravity force remains in the observable universe. In this way, the 5 6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION observed Planck scale is merely an effective value of a fundamental scale, which can be as low as the electroweak scale, around 1 TeV. In this line of reasoning, it comes as no surprise that should these scenarios represent reality, and gravity is so strong on such short distances, the creation of black holes may well occur at LHC experiments. Current measurements of gravity do not rule out these braneworld scenarios. Hence the excitement upon this prediction. The detection of a black hole would tell us much about the structure of spacetime, it would prove the existence of extra dimensions, and it might solve the hierarchy problem. Also, for the first time it would be possible to probe the quantum gravity regime. On the other hand, it might mean the end of particle physics as we know it, since if scattering events hide behind event horizons, none of them will be detected. The consequences for physics may be dire, but the Earth will not be obliterated by these microscopic black holes. The argument mentioned by Hawking, that cosmic ray observations tell us that black holes formed in collisions do not pose a threat to the Earth, is central in the safety assessment released by CERN. The expectation is that these black holes are so tiny, that they will evaporate through thermal radiation, originally proposed by and named after Hawking himself. Since the temperature of black holes is inversely proportional to their size, microscopic black holes will be extremely hot. They will decay rapidly in detectors, before they get the chance to accrete matter. It is even a question if we would even measure this radiation, since the spectrum is not exactly thermal. For this reason, it would be interesting to know if black holes produced at accelerators can somehow be made larger, before they get a chance to evaporate. One possibility might be to force the black hole to absorb large quantities of a hot plasma. It is possible that this has already happened in the early radiation-dominated universe. In the future we might even be able to simulate this situation in a laboratory environment. In particular, we could make a black hole inside a very hot quark-gluon plasma, making the hole grow by absorption. This thesis explores the exotic events that TeV-scale Gravity (TeVG) implied by braneworld scenarios makes possible. It follows the storyline laid out in the paragraphs above. In chapter 2, the general properties of black holes in four dimensions are reviewed. The different means of particle emission by black holes, including Hawking radiation, are derived. The differences between large and small black holes are made clear. It is also
Recommended publications
  • Universal Thermodynamics in the Context of Dynamical Black Hole
    universe Article Universal Thermodynamics in the Context of Dynamical Black Hole Sudipto Bhattacharjee and Subenoy Chakraborty * Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 April 2018; Accepted: 22 June 2018; Published: 1 July 2018 Abstract: The present work is a brief review of the development of dynamical black holes from the geometric point view. Furthermore, in this context, universal thermodynamics in the FLRW model has been analyzed using the notion of the Kodama vector. Finally, some general conclusions have been drawn. Keywords: dynamical black hole; trapped surfaces; universal thermodynamics; unified first law 1. Introduction A black hole is a region of space-time from which all future directed null geodesics fail to reach the future null infinity I+. More specifically, the black hole region B of the space-time manifold M is the set of all events P that do not belong to the causal past of future null infinity, i.e., B = M − J−(I+). (1) Here, J−(I+) denotes the causal past of I+, i.e., it is the set of all points that causally precede I+. The boundary of the black hole region is termed as the event horizon (H), H = ¶B = ¶(J−(I+)). (2) A cross-section of the horizon is a 2D surface H(S) obtained by intersecting the event horizon with a space-like hypersurface S. As event the horizon is a causal boundary, it must be a null hypersurface generated by null geodesics that have no future end points. In the black hole region, there are trapped surfaces that are closed 2-surfaces (S) such that both ingoing and outgoing congruences of null geodesics are orthogonal to S, and the expansion scalar is negative everywhere on S.
    [Show full text]
  • Astro 210 Lecture 37 April 23, 2018 Announcements
    Astro 210 Lecture 37 April 23, 2018 Announcements: • HW 11: The Final Frontier posted, due 5:00pm Friday • Grades: we are catching up! keep checking Moodle 1 Last Time: Searching for Black Holes Black holes themselves are invisible∗ can can detect them via their strong gravitational effects on their close surroundings example: binary stars X-rays emitted from unseen massive companion ∗this ignores Hawking radiation–see below 2 Our Own Galactic Center central ∼ 30 pc of Galaxy: can’t see optically (Q: why?), but can in other wavelengths: extended (non-point) radio emission (Sagittarius A) from high-energy electrons radio source at center: Sgr A∗ size 2.4 AU(!), variable emission in radio, X-ray www: X-ray Sgr A∗ in infrared wavelengths: can see stars near Sgr A∗ and they move! www: Sgr A∗ movie elliptical paths! closest: period P = 15.2 yr semi-major axis: a = 4.64 × 10−3 pc 3 6 → enclosed mass (3.7 ± 1.5) × 10 M⊙ Q: and so? the center of our Galaxy contains a black hole! Sgr A∗ Schwarzschild radius 7 −7 rSch = 1.1 × 10 km=0.74 AU = 3.6 × 10 pc (1) → not resolved (yet) but: Event Horizon Telescope has data and right now is processing possible first images! Galactic black hole raises many questions: • how did it get there? • Sgr A∗ low luminosity, “quiet” compared to more “active” galactic nuclei www: AGN: M87 why? open question.... • in last few months: discovery of high-energy “bubbles” 4 above & below Galactic center www: gamma-ray images → remains of the most recent Sgr A∗ belch? Galaxies and Black Holes The Milky Way is not the only
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Gr-Qc/0612030 V1 5 Dec 2006
    December 6, 2006 1:49 WSPC - Proceedings Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in main 1 STABLE DARK ENERGY STARS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO BLACK HOLES? FRANCISCO S. N. LOBO Centro de Astronomia e Astrof´ısica da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Ed. C8 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal flobo@cosmo.fis.fc.ul.pt In this work, a generalization of the Mazur-Mottola gravastar model is explored, by considering a matching of an interior solution governed by the dark energy equation of state, ω ≡ p/ρ < −1/3, to an exterior Schwarzschild vacuum solution at a junction interface, situated near to where the event horizon is expected to form. The motivation for implementing this generalization arises from the fact that recent observations have confirmed an accelerated cosmic expansion, for which dark energy is a possible candidate. Keywords: Gravastars; dark energy. Although evidence for the existence of black holes is very convincing, a certain amount of scepticism regarding the physical reality of singularities and event hori- zons is still encountered. In part, due to this scepticism, an alternative picture for the final state of gravitational collapse has emerged, where an interior compact ob- ject is matched to an exterior Schwarzschild vacuum spacetime, at or near where the event horizon is expected to form. Therefore, these alternative models do not possess a singularity at the origin and have no event horizon, as its rigid surface is arXiv:gr-qc/0612030 v1 5 Dec 2006 located at a radius slightly greater than the Schwarzschild radius. In particular, the gravastar (gravitational vacuum star) picture, proposed by Mazur and Mottola,1 has an effective phase transition at/near where the event horizon is expected to form, and the interior is replaced by a de Sitter condensate.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics CUSPINERA-CONTRERAS, JUAN,LEOPOLDO How to cite: CUSPINERA-CONTRERAS, JUAN,LEOPOLDO (2020) Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13421/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics Juan Leopoldo Cuspinera Contreras A Thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology Department of Physics University of Durham England September 2019 To my family Black holes, vacuum decay and thermodynamics Juan Leopoldo Cuspinera Contreras Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2019 Abstract In this thesis we study two fairly different aspects of gravity: vacuum decay seeded by black holes and black hole thermodynamics. The first part of this work is devoted to the study of black holes within the (higher dimensional) Randall- Sundrum braneworld scenario and their effect on vacuum decay rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to the Live Plenary Sessions
    IWARA2020 Video Conference Mexico City time zone, Mexico 9th International Workshop on Astronomy and Relativistic Astrophysics 6 – 12 September, 2020 Live Plenary Talks Program SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY DAYS/HOUR 06/09/2020 07/09/2020 08/09/2020 09/09/2020 10/09/2020 11/09/2020 12/09/2020 COSMOLOGY, DE MMA, DE, DM, CCGG COMPSTARS, DM, GWS DENSE MATTER, QCD DM, DE, GWS, BHS DENSE MATTER, SNOVAE ARCHAEOASTRONOMY TOPICS DM, COMPACT STARS X- & CR- RAYS, MWA PARTICLES, ϒ-RAYS QGP, QFT, HIC, GWS GRAVITATION, GALAXIES DM, COMPACT STARS BHS, GRBS, SNOVAE GRAVITY, BHS, GWS NSS, SNOVAE, GRAVITY QCD, HIC, SNOVAE DM, COSMOLOGY EROSITA DE, BHS, COSMOLOGY LIVE PLENARY TALKS PETER HESS & THOMAS BOLLER & STEVEN GULLBERG & PETER HESS & Steven Gullberg & LUIS UREÑA-LOPEZ & PETER HESS & MODERATORS CESAR ZEN GABRIELLA PICCINELLI CESAR ZEN THOMAS BOLLER Luis Ureña-Lopes BENNO BODMANN CESAR ZEN 07:00 WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM WAITING ROOM 07:45 OPENING 08:00 R. SACAHUI P. SLANE A. SANDOVAL S. FROMENTEAU G. PICCINELLI V. KARAS F. MIRABEL60’ 08:30 M. GAMARRA U. BARRES G. WOLF J. RUEDA R. XU J. STRUCKMEIER60’ 09:00 ULLBERG ARRISON ANAUSKE ENEZES EXHEIMER S. G D. G M. H D. M 60’ V. D D. ROSIŃSKA 09:30 V. ORTEGA G. ROMERO D. VASAK D. PAGE J. AICHELIN M. VARGAS 10:00 – CONFERENCE-BREAK: VIDEO-SYNTHESIS OF RECORDED VIDEOS LIVE SPOTLIGHTS TALKS MODERATORS MARIANA VARGAS MAGAÑA & GABRIELLA PICCINELLI 10:15 J. HORVATH Spotlight Session 1 SPOTLIGHT SESSION 2 Spotlight Session 3 Spotlight Session 4 Spotlight Session 5 SPOTLIGHT SESSION 6 MARCOS MOSHINSKY 10:45 AWARD 11:15 – CONFERENCE-BREAK: VIDEO-SYNTHESIS OF RECORDED VIDEOS LIVE PLENARY TALKS PETER HESS & THOMAS BOLLER & STEVEN GULLBERG & PETER HESS & Steven Gullberg & LUIS UREÑA-LOPEZ & PETER HESS & MODERATORS CESAR ZEN GABRIELLA PICCINELLI CESAR ZEN THOMAS BOLLER Luis Ureña-Lopes BENNO BODMANN CESAR ZEN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Duality Symmetries Between Photons and Cosmic String Loops, and Macro and Micro Black Holes
    Symmetry 2015, 7, 2134-2149; doi:10.3390/sym7042134 OPEN ACCESS symmetry ISSN 2073-8994 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry Article Three Duality Symmetries between Photons and Cosmic String Loops, and Macro and Micro Black Holes David Jou 1;2;*, Michele Sciacca 1;3;4;* and Maria Stella Mongiovì 4;5 1 Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain 2 Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Carme 47, Barcelona 08001, Spain 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Forestali, Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy 4 Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica, Roma 00185 , Italy 5 Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Gestionale, Informatica, Meccanica (DICGIM), Università di Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo 90128, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (M.S.); Tel.: +34-93-581-1658 (D.J.); +39-091-23897084 (M.S.). Academic Editor: Sergei Odintsov Received: 22 September 2015 / Accepted: 9 November 2015 / Published: 17 November 2015 Abstract: We present a review of two thermal duality symmetries between two different kinds of systems: photons and cosmic string loops, and macro black holes and micro black holes, respectively. It also follows a third joint duality symmetry amongst them through thermal equilibrium and stability between macro black holes and photon gas, and micro black holes and string loop gas, respectively. The possible cosmological consequences of these symmetries are discussed. Keywords: photons; cosmic string loops; black holes thermodynamics; duality symmetry 1. Introduction Thermal duality relates high-energy and low-energy states of corresponding dual systems in such a way that the thermal properties of a state of one of them at some temperature T are related to the properties of a state of the other system at temperature 1=T [1–6].
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Affinities, Posthumanisms and Science-Fictional Imaginings
    GENERIC AFFINITIES, POSTHUMANISMS, SCIENCE-FICTIONAL IMAGININGS SPECULATIVE MATTER: GENERIC AFFINITIES, POSTHUMANISMS AND SCIENCE-FICTIONAL IMAGININGS By LAURA M. WIEBE, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Laura Wiebe, October 2012 McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2012) Hamilton, Ontario (English and Cultural Studies) TITLE: Speculative Matter: Generic Affinities, Posthumanisms and Science-Fictional Imaginings AUTHOR: Laura Wiebe, B.A. (University of Waterloo), M.A. (Brock University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Anne Savage NUMBER OF PAGES: vi, 277 ii ABSTRACT Amidst the technoscientific ubiquity of the contemporary West (or global North), science fiction has come to seem the most current of genres, the narrative form best equipped to comment on and work through the social, political and ethical quandaries of rapid technoscientific development and the ways in which this development challenges conventional understandings of human identity and rationality. By this framing, the continuing popularity of stories about paranormal phenomena and supernatural entities – on mainstream television, or in print genres such as urban fantasy and paranormal romance – may seem to be a regressive reaction against the authority of and experience of living in technoscientific modernity. Nevertheless, the boundaries of science fiction, as with any genre, are relational rather than fixed, and critical engagements with Western/Northern technoscientific knowledge and practice and modern human identity and being may be found not just in science fiction “proper,” or in the scholarly field of science and technology studies, but also in the related genres of fantasy and paranormal romance.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rays, Singularities, and All That
    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That Edward Witten School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Abstract This article is an introduction to causal properties of General Relativity. Topics include the Raychaudhuri equation, singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking, the black hole area theorem, topological censorship, and the Gao-Wald theorem. The article is based on lectures at the 2018 summer program Prospects in Theoretical Physics at the Institute for Advanced Study, and also at the 2020 New Zealand Mathematical Research Institute summer school in Nelson, New Zealand. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Causal Paths 4 3 Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes 11 3.1 Definition . 11 3.2 Some Properties of Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes . 15 3.3 More On Compactness . 18 3.4 Cauchy Horizons . 21 3.5 Causality Conditions . 23 3.6 Maximal Extensions . 24 4 Geodesics and Focal Points 25 4.1 The Riemannian Case . 25 4.2 Lorentz Signature Analog . 28 4.3 Raychaudhuri’s Equation . 31 4.4 Hawking’s Big Bang Singularity Theorem . 35 5 Null Geodesics and Penrose’s Theorem 37 5.1 Promptness . 37 5.2 Promptness And Focal Points . 40 5.3 More On The Boundary Of The Future . 46 1 5.4 The Null Raychaudhuri Equation . 47 5.5 Trapped Surfaces . 52 5.6 Penrose’s Theorem . 54 6 Black Holes 58 6.1 Cosmic Censorship . 58 6.2 The Black Hole Region . 60 6.3 The Horizon And Its Generators . 63 7 Some Additional Topics 66 7.1 Topological Censorship . 67 7.2 The Averaged Null Energy Condition .
    [Show full text]
  • Singularities, Black Holes, and Cosmic Censorship: a Tribute to Roger Penrose
    Foundations of Physics (2021) 51:42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00432-1 INVITED REVIEW Singularities, Black Holes, and Cosmic Censorship: A Tribute to Roger Penrose Klaas Landsman1 Received: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract In the light of his recent (and fully deserved) Nobel Prize, this pedagogical paper draws attention to a fundamental tension that drove Penrose’s work on general rela- tivity. His 1965 singularity theorem (for which he got the prize) does not in fact imply the existence of black holes (even if its assumptions are met). Similarly, his versatile defnition of a singular space–time does not match the generally accepted defnition of a black hole (derived from his concept of null infnity). To overcome this, Penrose launched his cosmic censorship conjecture(s), whose evolution we discuss. In particular, we review both his own (mature) formulation and its later, inequivalent reformulation in the PDE literature. As a compromise, one might say that in “generic” or “physically reasonable” space–times, weak cosmic censorship postulates the appearance and stability of event horizons, whereas strong cosmic censorship asks for the instability and ensuing disappearance of Cauchy horizons. As an encore, an “Appendix” by Erik Curiel reviews the early history of the defni- tion of a black hole. Keywords General relativity · Roger Penrose · Black holes · Ccosmic censorship * Klaas Landsman [email protected] 1 Department of Mathematics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 42 Page 2 of 38 Foundations of Physics (2021) 51:42 Conformal diagram [146, p. 208, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Hole Formation and Stability: a Mathematical Investigation
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 55, Number 1, January 2018, Pages 1–30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1592 Article electronically published on September 25, 2017 BLACK HOLE FORMATION AND STABILITY: A MATHEMATICAL INVESTIGATION LYDIA BIERI Abstract. The dynamics of the Einstein equations feature the formation of black holes. These are related to the presence of trapped surfaces in the spacetime manifold. The mathematical study of these phenomena has gained momentum since D. Christodoulou’s breakthrough result proving that, in the regime of pure general relativity, trapped surfaces form through the focusing of gravitational waves. (The latter were observed for the first time in 2015 by Advanced LIGO.) The proof combines new ideas from geometric analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations, and it introduces new methods to solve large data problems. These methods have many applications beyond general relativity. D. Christodoulou’s result was generalized by S. Klainerman and I. Rodnianski, and more recently by these authors and J. Luk. Here, we investigate the dynamics of the Einstein equations, focusing on these works. Finally, we address the question of stability of black holes and what has been known so far, involving recent works of many contributors. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Mathematical general relativity 3 3. Gravitational radiation 12 4. The formation of closed trapped surfaces 14 5. Stability of black holes 25 6. Cosmic censorship 26 Acknowledgments 27 About the author 27 References 27 1. Introduction The Einstein equations exhibit singularities that are hidden behind event hori- zons of black holes. A black hole is a region of spacetime that cannot be ob- served from infinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars & Black Holes
    Introduction ? Recall that White Dwarfs are the second most common type of star. ? They are the remains of medium-sized stars - hydrogen fused to helium Neutron Stars - failed to ignite carbon - drove away their envelopes to from planetary nebulae & - collapsed and cooled to form White Dwarfs ? The more massive a White Dwarf, the smaller its radius Black Holes ? Stars more massive than the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 solar masses cannot be White Dwarfs Formation of Neutron Stars As the core of a massive star (residual mass greater than 1.4 ?Supernova 1987A solar masses) begins to collapse: (arrow) in the Large - density quickly reaches that of a white dwarf Magellanic Cloud was - but weight is too great to be supported by degenerate the first supernova electrons visible to the naked eye - collapse of core continues; atomic nuclei are broken apart since 1604. by gamma rays - Almost instantaneously, the increasing density forces freed electrons to absorb electrons to form neutrons - the star blasts away in a supernova explosion leaving behind a neutron star. Properties of Neutron Stars Crab Nebula ? Neutrons stars predicted to have a radius of about 10 km ? In CE 1054, Chinese and a density of 1014 g/cm3 . astronomers saw a ? This density is about the same as the nucleus supernova ? A sugar-cube-sized lump of this material would weigh 100 ? Pulsar is at center (arrow) million tons ? It is very energetic; pulses ? The mass of a neutron star cannot be more than 2-3 solar are detectable at visual masses wavelengths ? Neutron stars are predicted to rotate very fast, to be very ? Inset image taken by hot, and have a strong magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications-Mathematics and Applied Mathematics/Download/8110
    A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." ― Socrates Manjunath.R #16/1, 8th Main Road, Shivanagar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore560010, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] *Website: http://www.myw3schools.com/ A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe What’s the Ultimate Question? Since the dawn of the history of science from Copernicus (who took the details of Ptolemy, and found a way to look at the same construction from a slightly different perspective and discover that the Earth is not the center of the universe) and Galileo to the present, we (a hoard of talking monkeys who's consciousness is from a collection of connected neurons − hammering away on typewriters and by pure chance eventually ranging the values for the (fundamental) numbers that would allow the development of any form of intelligent life) have gazed at the stars and attempted to chart the heavens and still discovering the fundamental laws of nature often get asked: What is Dark Matter? ... What is Dark Energy? ... What Came Before the Big Bang? ... What's Inside a Black Hole? ... Will the universe continue expanding? Will it just stop or even begin to contract? Are We Alone? Beginning at Stonehenge and ending with the current crisis in String Theory, the story of this eternal question to uncover the mysteries of the universe describes a narrative that includes some of the greatest discoveries of all time and leading personalities, including Aristotle, Johannes Kepler, and Isaac Newton, and the rise to the modern era of Einstein, Eddington, and Hawking.
    [Show full text]