Black hole or Gravastar? The GW190521 case I. Antoniou1, ∗ 1Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Ioannina, Greece (Dated: August 31, 2021) The existence of cosmological compact objects with very strong gravity is a prediction of General Relativity and an exact solution of the Einstein equations. These objects are called black holes and recently we had the first observations of them. However, the theory of black hole formation has some disadvantages. In order to avoid these, some scientists suggest the existence of gravastars (gravitation vacuum stars), an alternative stellar model which seems to solve the problems of the black hole theory. In this work we compare black holes and gravastars using a wide range of the literature and we emphasize the properties of gravastars, which are consistent with the current cosmological observations. Also, we propose gravastars as the solution of the ”pair-instability” effect and a possible explanation for the observed masses of the compact objects, before the collapse, from the gravitational signal GW190521, since in the formation of a gravastar there aren’t mass restrictions. PACS numbers: 98.62.Ai, 04.20.Cv, 04.30.-w I. INTRODUCTION black holes, or some other compact object with very strong gravity. Many scientists dispute the One of the most attractive concepts in Gen- existence of black holes because if we take into ac- eral Relativity is the existence and the properties count quantum effects, the gravitational collapse of black holes, a region of spacetime where grav- of objects comes to a halt and furthermore no ity is so strong that nothing, no particles or even event horizon forms [2]. Cosmologists all around electromagnetic radiation such as light, can es- the world investigate the existence of an alterna- cape from it. A black hole is characterized by tive model [3], which has not the above ’strange the charge Q, the mass M and the total angu- properties’ [4]. Consequently, this model will lar momentum J. The mass M is in the range be more attractive and realistic than black holes [5, 6]. The most successful cosmological model in above 3MJ until a few decades of the mass of this direction is called gravastar configuration, an Sun, or a few millions or billions MJ. The latter are known as supermassive black holes and exist alternative endpoint of gravitational collapse of a in the centers of most galaxies. Even if the theory massive star, which do not involve horizon and of black hole formation is well known, there are proposed by Mazur and Mottola [7]. The main some abstruse and ’strange properties’ such as idea is that the gravitational collapse stops at a radius greater than the radius of the horizon [8]. • the ”event horizon”, a boundary in space- Mazur and Mottola also showed that their gravas- time through which matter and light can tars are thermodynamically stable unlike in the pass only inward towards the mass of the case of the black hole. arXiv:2010.05354v2 [gr-qc] 29 Aug 2021 black hole. • the gravitational singularity at the center of a black hole, a region where the spacetime II. THE STRUCTURE OF A GRAVASTAR curvature becomes infinite. • the information paradox, where a pure Thin spherical shells are boundary hypersur- quantum state which passes over the event faces with shell radius R, surface energy density horizon can evolve into a mixed state dur- σ and surface pressure p. Gravastar is a spherical ing the evaporation of the black hole. static stable thin shell configuration and an ex- The first picture of the structure in the center of act solution of the equations of motion in GR M87 [1] is a strong evidence for the existence of when the shell is spherical and infinitesimally thin [9–11]. Usually a gravastar is divided in three regions. The interior geometry is de Sit- ter metric with equation of state p = −ρ (false ∗ [email protected] vacuum or dark energy) and the exterior is usu- 2 ally Schwarzschild metric with equation of state ined for their consistency with particular inter- p =0= ρ (true vacuum). The exterior metric pretations of Mach’s principle. is related to the interior metric in the context of the Israel junction conditions [9]. On the horizon The detection of gravitational waves has there is a thin shell of matter (perfect fluid) with opened a new window in the Universe and a new radius R and equation of state p = ρ. way to observe cosmological structures and sig- natures of them. Many authors have investigated The concept of gravastar is related to a Rie- the behaviour of a gravitation wave in the vicin- mannian manifold which is divided by a 3- ity of a compact mass. Authors of Ref. [23] found dimentional timelike surface in two pieces, named that the dust shell causes the gravitational wave exterior and interior regions and are gluing on to be modified both in magnitude and phase with- this surface. Visser [12] introduced such an ap- out energy transfer, while the authors of Ref. [24] proach to develop thin-shell gravastars by the found that a compact mass such as a black hole junction of both spacetimes that eliminate the induces modification in frequency, magnitude and event horizon and singularity. The mathematical energy of a wave in the vicinity of the mass. The procedure used to develop the geometry of the different behaviour could be a criterion to distin- gravastars is based (mainly) on Israel’s [9] and guish a gravastar from a black hole. Mazur and Mottola works [7]. The metric has the form Another way to discriminate a gravastar from a black hole is developing in Ref. [25]. Quasinor- 2 2 2 dr± 2 2 2 2 mal frequency modes (complex numbers where ds± = −f±(r)dt± + +r±(dθ±+sin θ±dφ±) f±(r) the imaginary part corresponds to the loss of en- (2.1) ergy) are produced from a black hole. The au- where the (+) corresponds to the exterior region, thors of Ref. [25] computed polar and axial oscil- while the (-) to interior region. The f±(r) func- lation modes of gravastar. They found that the tion determines the interior and exterior back- quasinormal mode spectrum is completely differ- ground of the thin shell. ent from that of a black hole when both have the The crucial question about the concept of same gravitational mass. Also, the equation of gravastars is under which conditions these con- state of the matter-shell affects the polar spec- figurations are stable. Many properties affect the trum. In Ref. [26] the authors calculated quasi- answer, such as the background geometry [13], ra- normal modes of axial parity perturbations and dial perturbations (using static spherical models) they found that the decay rate of a black hole and about the equilibrium shell’s radius [12, 14, 15], a gravastar are not the same. the function of the innermost and exterior mass The evolution of a star with mass above 3M [12] and the rotation of the shell [16, 17]. In every J ends with a black hole, but there is an upper case there are values of the corresponding param- mass-limit. The mass must be less than 64M eters for which the potential V (r) of the shell has J [27]. From stellar evolution in close binaries, no minimum equal to zero. Actually, there is a wide black holes between 52M and 133M are ex- range of parameters which allow stable gravastar J J pected. The effect is known as “pair-instability” solutions [13, 18], which means that the gravastar [28]. The GW190521 shows that there are com- is a viable cosmological structure. pact objects with mass in the above range (confi- In order to construct a stable gravastar, many dence level 99%) and the scientific community is authors consider a shell with different cosmologi- looking for answers [29]. The mass of the initial cal backgrounds (except the Schwarzshild-de Sit- +21 +171 compact objects was 85−14MJ and 66−18 MJ ter) such as a background with cosmological con- (90% credible intervals), which falls in the mass stant [19] or regular spacetimes (Bardeen and gap predicted by pulsational pair-instability su- Bardeen-de Sitter black holes) [15]. They in- pernova theory [30]. The mass of the remnant vestigate the stability under radial perturbations +28 after the collapse is 142−16MJ which is near the [12, 13] or under slow rotation [16, 17, 20]. Rotat- above limit of the mass gap. ing gravastars can affect the inertial frames and they induce the dragging effect [21, 22]. The ro- In order to calculate the total mass of a gravas- tation of a massive shell induces rotation of the tar, we must divide it in three regions, the inner inertial frame which tend to be equal near the region, the thin shell and the outer region. In the Schwarzschild radius and the results of the rota- case where the interior region has negative pres- tion and expanding/re-collapsing shell are exam- sure with equation of state p = −ρ (de Sitter) the 3 inner mass is [31] gap arises from the pair instability or pulsational pair instability causing mass loss or destruction R 2 4 3 of the stellar progenitor prior to the formation m−(R)= 4πr c0dr = πR c0 (2.2) Z0 3 of any remnant. In the process of stellar evolu- tion there could appear gravastars of masses from where c0 is the constant matter density through- GW190521. Probably, this gravitational wave out the interior region. The parameter c0 in- signal (GW190521) is a strong indication for the cludes information about the constant pressure existence of gravastars.