<<

arXiv:2010.05354v2 [gr-qc] 29 Aug 2021 oeasrs n srnepoete’sc as are such there properties’ known, ’strange well and is abstruse theory some formation the hole if Even black . exist of most and of holes centers the black in supermassive as known are a momentum lar bv 3 above u,o e iloso billions or millions few a or , aefo t lc oei hrceie by characterized is hole black A charge es- the can it. light, even from as or cape particles such no radiation nothing, grav- that where electromagnetic strong spacetime so of is region ity a properties holes, the black and of existence the is Relativity eral h rtpcueo h tutr ntecne of center the in structure [ the M87 of picture first The ∗ [email protected] n ftems trciecnet nGen- in concepts attractive most the of One • • • ASnmes 86.i 42.v 04.30.-w 04.20.Cv, 98.62.Ai, format numbers: PACS the in since GW190521, t of signal restrictions. as gravitational observed the the w for from propose explanation gravastars, gra possible we and of a and holes Also, properties effect black the compare observations. emphasize we cosmological we work this and w In literature model t theory. stellar scient However, hole alternative some black these, an them. avoid ), to of vacuum order observations equations. (gravitation In first Einstein disadvantages. the some the had has of we solution recently exact and an and Relativity n h vprto ftebakhole. black dur- the state of evaporation mixed the a pure ing into event evolve a the can over horizon where passes which state paradox, quantum information the spacetime the where infinite. region becomes curvature a hole, black of center a the at singularity gravitational the the of can the hole. towards light black inward and only space- pass which in through boundary a time horizon”, ”event the 1 sasrn vdnefrteeitneof existence the for evidence strong a is ] h xsec fcsooia opc bet ihvr str very with objects compact cosmological of existence The M J Q .INTRODUCTION I. ni e eae ftems of mass the of decades few a until h mass the , 1 eateto hsc,Uiest fIann,G-51,I GR-45110, Ioannina, of University Physics, of Department J h mass The . lc oeo rvsa?TeG102 case GW190521 The ? or hole Black M n h oa angu- total the and M M si h range the in is J h latter The . Dtd uut3,2021) 31, August (Dated: .Antoniou I. rpsdb au n otl [ and Mottola horizon and involve Mazur not by do proposed which a , of massive collapse gravitational of an endpoint configuration, alternative gravastar called is direction this [ properties’ fojcscmst atadfrhroeno furthermore and halt [ a forms to horizon event comes objects collapse gravitational of ac- the into effects, take we quantum if count the because dispute holes with black scientists of object Many existence compact . other strong some very or holes, black he ein.Teitro emtyi eSit- state de of is equation geometry with interior metric The ter regions. three the hole. black in the unlike of stable case thermodynamically gravas- [ are their horizon tars that showed the a also of Mottola at and radius Mazur stops the collapse than gravitational greater radius the that is idea alterna- [ an of model existence tive the investigate world the hnteseli peia n infinitesimally and GR in spherical motion is [ of thin shell equations ex- the the an when of and configuration solution shell act thin stable static ae ihselradius shell with faces σ emr trcieadraitcta lc holes black than realistic [ and attractive more be aumo akeeg)adteetro susu- is exterior the and ) dark or vacuum 5 , n ufc surface and hnshrclsel r onayhypersur- boundary are shells spherical Thin 1, 6 .Tems ucsflcsooia oe in model cosmological successful most The ]. ∗ 9 ihsest ov h rbeso the of problems the solve to seems hich – ecmatojcs eoetecollapse, the before objects, compact he I H TUTR FA OF STRUCTURE THE II. sssgetteeitneo gravastars of existence the suggest ists 11 h ouino h ”pair-instability” the of solution the ihaecnitn ihtecurrent the with consistent are hich n rvt sapeito fGeneral of prediction a is gravity ong hs bet r aldbakholes black called are objects These o fagaatrteeae’ mass aren’t there gravastar a of ion .Uulyagaatri iie in divided is gravastar a Usually ]. 3 eter fbakhl formation hole black of theory he atr sn ierneo the of range wide a using vastars 4 ,wihhsntteaoe’strange above the not has which ], .Cneunl,ti oe will model this Consequently, ]. GRAVASTAR ann,Greece oannina, 2 .Csooit l around all Cosmologists ]. p R rvsa saspherical a is Gravastar . ufc nrydensity energy surface , p 7 .Temain The ]. = − ρ (false 8 ]. 2 ally with ined for their consistency with particular inter- p =0= ρ (true vacuum). The exterior metric pretations of Mach’s principle. is related to the interior metric in the context of the Israel junction conditions [9]. On the horizon The detection of gravitational waves has there is a thin shell of matter (perfect fluid) with opened a new window in the and a new radius R and equation of state p = ρ. way to observe cosmological structures and sig- natures of them. Many authors have investigated The concept of gravastar is related to a Rie- the behaviour of a gravitation wave in the vicin- mannian manifold which is divided by a 3- ity of a compact mass. Authors of Ref. [23] found dimentional timelike surface in two pieces, named that the dust shell causes the exterior and interior regions and are gluing on to be modified both in and phase with- this surface. Visser [12] introduced such an ap- out energy transfer, while the authors of Ref. [24] proach to develop thin-shell gravastars by the found that a compact mass such as a junction of both spacetimes that eliminate the induces modification in frequency, magnitude and and singularity. The mathematical energy of a wave in the vicinity of the mass. The procedure used to develop the geometry of the different behaviour could be a criterion to distin- gravastars is based (mainly) on Israel’s [9] and guish a gravastar from a black hole. Mazur and Mottola works [7]. The metric has the form Another way to discriminate a gravastar from a black hole is developing in Ref. [25]. Quasinor- 2 2 2 dr± 2 2 2 2 mal frequency modes (complex numbers where ds± = −f±(r)dt± + +r±(dθ±+sin θ±dφ±) f±(r) the imaginary part corresponds to the loss of en- (2.1) ergy) are produced from a black hole. The au- where the (+) corresponds to the exterior region, thors of Ref. [25] computed polar and axial oscil- while the (-) to interior region. The f±(r) func- lation modes of gravastar. They found that the tion determines the interior and exterior back- quasinormal mode spectrum is completely differ- ground of the thin shell. ent from that of a black hole when both have the The crucial question about the concept of same gravitational mass. Also, the equation of gravastars is under which conditions these con- state of the matter-shell affects the polar spec- figurations are stable. Many properties affect the trum. In Ref. [26] the authors calculated quasi- answer, such as the background geometry [13], ra- normal modes of axial parity perturbations and dial perturbations (using static spherical models) they found that the decay rate of a black hole and about the equilibrium shell’s radius [12, 14, 15], a gravastar are not the same. the function of the innermost and exterior mass The evolution of a star with mass above 3M [12] and the rotation of the shell [16, 17]. In every J ends with a black hole, but there is an upper case there are values of the corresponding param- mass-limit. The mass must be less than 64M eters for which the potential V (r) of the shell has J [27]. From in close binaries, no minimum equal to zero. Actually, there is a wide black holes between 52M and 133M are ex- range of parameters which allow stable gravastar J J pected. The effect is known as “pair-instability” solutions [13, 18], which means that the gravastar [28]. The GW190521 shows that there are com- is a viable cosmological structure. pact objects with mass in the above range (confi- In order to construct a stable gravastar, many dence level 99%) and the scientific community is authors consider a shell with different cosmologi- looking for answers [29]. The mass of the initial cal backgrounds (except the Schwarzshild-de Sit- +21 +171 compact objects was 85−14MJ and 66−18 MJ ter) such as a background with cosmological con- (90% credible intervals), which falls in the mass stant [19] or regular spacetimes (Bardeen and gap predicted by pulsational pair-instability su- Bardeen-de Sitter black holes) [15]. They in- pernova theory [30]. The mass of the remnant vestigate the stability under radial perturbations +28 after the collapse is 142−16MJ which is near the [12, 13] or under slow rotation [16, 17, 20]. Rotat- above limit of the mass gap. ing gravastars can affect the inertial frames and they induce the dragging effect [21, 22]. The ro- In order to calculate the total mass of a gravas- tation of a massive shell induces rotation of the tar, we must divide it in three regions, the inner inertial frame which tend to be equal near the region, the thin shell and the outer region. In the and the results of the rota- case where the interior region has negative pres- tion and expanding/re-collapsing shell are exam- sure with equation of state p = −ρ (de Sitter) the 3 inner mass is [31] gap arises from the pair instability or pulsational pair instability causing mass loss or destruction R 2 4 3 of the stellar progenitor prior to the formation m−(R)= 4πr c0dr = πR c0 (2.2) Z0 3 of any remnant. In the process of stellar evolu- tion there could appear gravastars of masses from where c0 is the constant matter density through- GW190521. Probably, this gravitational wave out the interior region. The parameter c0 in- signal (GW190521) is a strong indication for the cludes information about the constant pressure existence of gravastars. and constant density throughout the interior re- gion. The mass of the ultrarelativistic, extremely III. CONCLUSIONS thin stiff shell [32] of radius R, which obeys the equation of state p = ρ (the density is very high) and has width ǫ ≪ 1 is Gravastar is a hypothetical stellar compact ob- ject alternative to a black hole. Until now, there 2 ms =4πR σ (2.3) is no observational way to distinguish a black hole from a gravastar. Thus, a possible obser- where σ is the surface energy density of the thin vation of a black hole can be a possible gravas- shell. tar. Recent observations of gravitational wave The exterior region is a static Schwarzschild GW190521 pointed out that the theory of black geometry with equation of state p = ρ = 0 and holes formation is not consistent with observa- the parameter m+ in the metric is the total mass tions, since there is a mass gap in their formation. of the of a gravastar. Thus, the From theoretical view, there is a way to avoid total mass [32] is the sum of the equations (2.2) the pair instability effect/mass gap with gravas- and (2.3), ie tar formation. The GW190521 event could be an indication for the existence of gravastars, which 2 R might avoid the mass gap. This stellar config- M ≡ m+ = m− + m =4πR (c0 + σ) (2.4) gr s 3 uration (gravastar) is a promising candidate to complete the puzzle or to replace black holes. This is the mass which is observable from the . From eq. (2.4) we conclude that the mass M depends from the radius of the thin shell and gr IV. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS the matter density of the inner region and the thin shell. The result could be as big as needed, to support the cosmological observations. I would like to thank Professors Leandros It is obvious that the theory of gravastars Perivolaropoulos and Demetrios Papadopoulos hasn’t mass restrictions, so it seems that this for useful discussions and indications about the configuration can solve the problem of the mass gravastars, which improved the quality of this gap that GW190521 suffers from. This mass work.

[1] Kazunori Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Tele- [4] Celine Cattoen, Cosmological milestones and scope), “First M87 gravastars: Topics in , Other Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive thesis (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0606011. Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. 875, L1 (2019), [5] Roman A. Konoplya, C. Posada, Z. Stuchl´ık, arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]. and A. Zhidenko, “Stable Schwarzschild stars [2] Valeri P. Frolov, “Do Black Holes Exist?” in 18th as black-hole mimickers,” Phys. Rev. D 100, International Seminar on High Energy Physics 044027 (2019), arXiv:1905.08097 [gr-qc]. (2014) arXiv:1411.6981 [hep-th]. [6] Irina Dymnikova and Maxim Khlopov, “Regu- [3] Vitor Cardoso and Paolo Pani, “Testing the na- lar black hole remnants and graviatoms with ture of dark compact objects: a status report,” de Sitter interior as heavy dark matter can- Living Rev. Rel. 22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 didates probing inhomogeneity of early uni- [gr-qc]. verse,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1545002 (2015), arXiv:1510.01351 [gr-qc]. 4

[7] Pawel O. Mazur and Emil Mottola, “Gravita- [20] Nami Uchikata and Shijun Yoshida, “Slowly ro- tional condensate stars: An alternative to black tating thin shell gravastars,” Class. Quant. Grav. holes,” (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0109035. 33, 025005 (2016), arXiv:1506.06485 [gr-qc]. [8] Ken-ichi Nakao, Chul- Yoo, and Tomo- [21] Dieter R. Brill and Jeffrey M. Cohen, ROTAT- hiro Harada, “Gravastar formation: What can ING MASSES AND THEIR EFFECT ON IN- be the evidence of a black hole?” Phys. Rev. D ERTIAL FRAMES, Other thesis (1966). 99, 044027 (2019), arXiv:1809.00124 [gr-qc]. [22] Lee Lindblom and Dieter R. Brill, “Inertial ef- [9] W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin fects in the of a rotating shells in general relativity,” Nuovo Cim. B shell,” Phys. Rev. D 10, 3151–3155 (1974). 44S10, 1 (1966), [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, [23] Nigel T. Bishop, Petrus J. van der Walt, and 463 (1967)]. Monos Naidoo, “Effect of a low density dust [10] J.S. Hoye, I. Linnerud, K. Olaussen, and R. Sol- shell on the propagation of gravitational waves,” lie, “EVOLUTION OF SPHERICAL SHELLS Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, 92 (2020), arXiv:1912.08289 IN GENERAL RELATIVITY,” Phys. Scripta [gr-qc]. 31, 97 (1985). [24] I. Antoniou, D. Papadopoulos, and [11] Charles W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, and J.A. L. Perivolaropoulos, “Propagation of gravi- Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Fran- tational waves in an expanding background in cisco, 1973). the presence of a point mass,” Phys. Rev. D 94, [12] Matt Visser and David L. Wiltshire, “Stable 084018 (2016), arXiv:1607.08103 [gr-qc]. gravastars: An Alternative to black holes?” [25] Paolo Pani, Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 1135–1152 (2004), Yanbei Chen, and Richard Norte, “Gravita- arXiv:gr-qc/0310107. tional wave signatures of the absence of an event [13] G. Alestas, G.V. Kraniotis, and horizon. I. Nonradial oscillations of a thin-shell L. Perivolaropoulos, “Existence and Sta- gravastar,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 124047 (2009), bility of Static Spherical Fluid Shells in a arXiv:0909.0287 [gr-qc]. Schwarzschild-Rindler-anti-de Sitter Metric,” [26] Cecilia B.M.H. Chirenti and , (2020), arXiv:2005.11702 [gr-qc]. “How to tell a gravastar from a black hole,” [14] Francisco S.N. Lobo, Alex Simpson, and Class. Quant. Grav. 24, 4191–4206 (2007), Matt Visser, “Dynamic thin-shell black-bounce arXiv:0706.1513 [gr-qc]. traversable ,” Phys. Rev. D 101, [27] S.E. Woosley, “Pulsational Pair-Instability Su- 124035 (2020), arXiv:2003.09419 [gr-qc]. pernovae,” Astrophys. J. 836, 244 (2017), [15] M. Sharif and Faisal Javed, “Stability of gravas- arXiv:1608.08939 [astro-ph.HE]. tars with exterior regular black holes,” An- [28] Shing-Chi Leung, Ken’ichi Nomoto, and Sergei nals Phys. 415, 168124 (2020), arXiv:2003.04893 Blinnikov, “Pulsational Pair-instability Super- [gr-qc]. novae. I. Pre-collapse Evolution and Pulsational [16] Vitor Cardoso, Paolo Pani, Mariano Cadoni, Mass Ejection,” Astrophys. J. 887, 72 (2019), and Marco Cavaglia, “Ergoregion instability of arXiv:1901.11136 [astro-ph.HE]. ultracompact astrophysical objects,” Phys. Rev. [29] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Prop- D 77, 124044 (2008), arXiv:0709.0532 [gr-qc]. erties and Astrophysical Implications of the 150 [17] Cecilia B.M.H. Chirenti and Luciano Rez- M⊙ Merger GW190521,” As- zolla, “On the ergoregion instability in rotating trophys. J. 900, L13 (2020), arXiv:2009.01190 gravastars,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 084011 (2008), [astro-ph.HE]. arXiv:0808.4080 [gr-qc]. [30] R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), [18] Benedict M.N. Carter, “Stable gravastars with “GW190521: A Binary Black Hole Merger with generalised exteriors,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22, a Total Mass of 150 M⊙,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 4551–4562 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0509087. 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]. [19] Yuki Yamanaka, Ken-ichi Nakao, and Humi- [31] G. Abbas and K. Majeed, “Isotropic Gravastar taka Sato, “Motion of a dust shell in the space Model in Rastall Gravity,” Adv. Astron. 2020, time with a cosmological constant,” Prog. Theor. 8861168 (2020). Phys. 88, 1097–1106 (1992). [32] Ujjal Debnath, “Charged Gravastars in Rastall- Rainbow Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 442 (2021), arXiv:1909.01139 [physics.gen-ph].