The Northern Transition Area Between Leonese and Castilian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Northern Transition Area Between Leonese and Castilian The northern transition area between Leonese and Castilian Autor(en): Penny, Ralph Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Revue de linguistique romane Band (Jahr): 42 (1978) Heft 165-166 PDF erstellt am: 03.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-399655 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch THE NORTHERN TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN LEONESE AND CASTILIAN In this article, the topic under discussion is that of dialectal and other linguistic boundaries. It is taken as axiomatic that such boundaries are rarely, if ever, sharp, but consist of a number of isoglosses, with more or less geographical space between each isogloss and the next. In establishing the linguistic boundaries even of the recent past, we are heavily dependent on knowledge of ethnic and political boundaries. In the case of the Leonese-Castilian boundary, the main difficulty is that not until the nth century is there a major political boundary separating the area where Leonese grew up from the area where Castilian originated. In previous periods, such political boundaries as existed between the two areas were of a minor nature and in any case their course is imperfectly known. By way of introduction, I shall review what is known of the ethnic and political boundaries in our area in seven historical periods : i) It has been claimed that the pre-Roman boundary separating the Astures and the Cantabri is one which has dialectal consequences *. Leonese certainly grew up in the territory of the Astures, while some have claimed that Castilian is the descendent of Cantabrian Latin. However, the course of the Asturian-Cantabrian boundary is open to dispute, as we shall see. 2) Roman provincial boundaries often followed pre-existing tribal boundaries. For a short period (between 27 and 3 BC), immediately after the conquest of the hostile northern coastal area, Asturian territory was included within Lusitania, while Cantabria was added to the Citerior. However, from the beginning of the Christian era, Asturia (together with what is now Galicia and northern Portugal) was also administered as part of the Citerior 2. Then, with Diocletian's administrative reform in the late 1. E.g. Menéndez Pidal, Orígenes del español, 5th ed., Madrid 1964, 214; R. Lapesa, Historia de la lengua española, 3rd ed., Madrid 1955, 28 ; A. Galmés de Fuentes, D. Catalán Menéndez Pidal, ' Un límite lingüístico ', RDTP, 2, 1946, 196-239 ; A. Zamora Vicente, Dialectología española, 2nd ed., Madrid 1967, 57. 2. C. Sánchez Albornoz, Orígenes de la nación española. Estudios críticos sobre la historia del reino de Asturias, I, Oviedo 1972, 87. TRANSITION AREA BETWEEN LEONESE AND CASTILIAN 45 3rd century, both Cantabria and Asturia, together with Galicia and Portugal north of the Duero, were detached from the Citerior to form a new independent province of Gallaecia1. Therefore, Asturia and Cantabria belonged to different Roman provinces for only 24 years. SantaneJU** OVlt«» T A U o t ft f V IXCAYA t »... ' '-.':'.- L O M al 1 t ¦>- - PALEGGIA B U, R Q OS OUYQ05 3) The internal boundaries of the Roman provinces, the boundaries of the conventus, also often followed tribal boundaries. Indeed, the conventus, are most frequently defined in tribal terms — tribes A, B and C are said to belong to conventus X — so that we do not normally know the geographical extent of a conventus, unless we know the area occupied by given tribes. In this context, all we know about Asturia and Cantabria is that they belonged to different conventus, Asturia to the conventus asturicensis and Cantabria to the conventus cluniensis. 4) Diocesan boundaries are known often to follow Roman administrative boundaries (specifically, those of the conventus). But little precise is known about the diocesan boundaries of northern Spain in the late Roman, Visi- gothic and early Reconquest periods. 5) Castile is of course part of the kingdom of León until the early nth century. From the mid 10th century we know reasonably precisely the boundary between the county of Castile and the neighbouring, less autonomous, 1. Sánchez Albornoz, Orígenes, 97. 46 R. PENNY counties to the West. It followed the Deva from the sea to the Cantabrian mountains 1 and the Pisuerga from these mountains to the Duero 2. But this boundary appears to be a new creation ; it does not correspond with any known boundary of any previous period. 6) There is no difficulty in tracing the Leonese-Castilian political boundary from the nth to the 13th centuries. But the castilianization of eastern León (south of the mountains) was clearly going ahead rapidly at this time, so that the linguistic significance of this boundary (at least, of that part of it which lay south of the mountains) can only be small. 7) Lastly, the unification of León and Castile sooner or later removes any linguistic significance the political boundary south of the Cantabrian mountains may once have had. The main purpose of this article is to discuss, first, how far the isoglosses which separate Leonese and Castilian are a reflection of the pre-Roman and Roman political boundaries in the area ; and, secondly, whether the medieval political boundaries have more or less linguistic consequences than the pre-Roman and Roman ones. It has been claimed that Castilian is the descendent of the Latin of Cantabria, while Leonese is the descendent of that of Asturia. Menéndez Pidal's substratum account of the development of Latin F - hinges on this theory : he claims that the aspiration of F- is a feature of Cantabrian-influenced Latin, while the Latin of Asturia maintained f- intact3. We have seen that except for a few years after their conquest Asturia and Cantabria belonged to the same Roman province (although to different conventus). The precise geographical extent of the Asturian and Cantabrian areas is not known. Almost the sole concrete information on where their common boundary ran in the area between the sea and the Cantabrian mountains is a reference by Pomponius Mela (ist century AD) to a river salía as the boundary between the Astures and the Cantabri. This river salía may be identified with either of two rivers (although conceivably with neither) : the Sella, which rises in Riaño (NE León province), flows through the Peaks of Europe, through eastern Asturias and reaches the sea 1. R. Menéndez Pidal, Documentos lingüísticos de España, I, Reino de Castilla, Madrid 1919, 13. 2. Menéndez Pidal, Orígenes, 476. 3. Menéndez Pidal, Orígenes, 41. transition area between leonese and castilian 47 at Ribadesella. Alternatively, the salía may be identified with the Saja, some fifty miles to the East, which flows into the sea at Suances (25 miles west of Santander). Of these two hydronyms, only Saja is a regular phonetic descendant of salía in its area (cf. palea > paja in Santander). In the area where the Sella flows, palea gives paya, so that from salía we would here expect *Saya. In the first edition of Orígenes del español, in 1926, Menéndez Pidal stresses that the f¡aspirate isogloss (whose existence he ascribes to ethnic factors) is located near the river Sella. However, he does not go as far as stating that this river had once constituted the boundary between Astures and Cantabri-. This step is taken by Sánchez Albornoz in 1929, in the process of attempting to establish the geographical areas occupied by each of the pre-Roman tribes of northern Spain 1. Sánchez Albornoz, then, identifies the river salía, mentioned by Pomponius Mela, with the modern Sella. But in ignoring the Saja and adopting the Sella, Sánchez Albornoz leans almost exclusively on the linguistic evidence presented by Menéndez Pidal in Orígenes1 (the fjaspirate isogloss). Sánchez Albornoz supposes that the form salía has been the victim of corrupt transmission and that the original spelling was *saelia. This neatly, if somewhat arbitrarily, takes care of the tonic vowel of sella, but fails to resolve the difficulty posed by the l + yod cluster. The dialects of eastern Asturias do not confuse the reflex of L + yod ([y]) with that of -ll- ([1]) ; and since yeísmo is unknown in this area, there is no possibility that the form Sella has been arrived at through hypercorrection (in the way that medieval Castilian Mayorca became Mallorca). Even starting from *saelia, Sánchez Albornoz's argument will not account for the form Sella, but only for *Seya. In spite of these phonetic difficulties, the argument comes full circle with the appearance in 1950 of the third edition of Orígenes del español, in which Menéndez Pidal uses Sánchez Albornoz's conclusions on the geographical extend of Cantabria in support of his substratum explanation of the aspiration of F-2. The linguist and the historian each support the other, but if we once deny the historical basis of their argument (the identity of salía and Sella), the argument becomes untenable.
Recommended publications
  • In Focusthe Barcelona Centre for International Affairs Brief
    CIDOB • Barcelona Centre for International 2012 for September Affairs. Centre CIDOB • Barcelona in focusThe Barcelona Centre for International Affairs Brief Spain’s Interregional Trade: 03 How Close is the Link? OCTOBER he following graphs contextualise the importance of the national and 2012 international market for the 17 dif ferent Spanish regions, in terms of both T sales and purchases, and in terms of internal market flows. Sales of Goods to Other Spanish Regions and Abroad (2011) 46 54 Basque County 36 64 45,768 M€ 33 67 Cantabria 45 55 7,231 M€ Navarre 54 46 Asturias 17,856 M€ 53 47 Galicia 11,058 M€ 32,386 M€ 40 60 31 69 Catalonia La Rioja 104,914 M€ Castile-Leon 4,777 M€ 30,846 M€ 39 61 Aragon 54 46 23,795 M€ Madrid 45,132 M€ 45 55 22 78 5050 Valencia 29 71 Castile-La Mancha 44,405 M€ Balearic Islands Extremaura 18,692 M€ 1,694 M€ 4,896 M€ 39 61 Murcia 14,541 M€ 44 56 4,890 M€ Andalusia Canary Islands 52,199 M€ 49 51 % Sales 0-4% 5-10% To the Spanish World Regions 11-15% 16-20% Source: C-Intereg, INE and Datacomex Produced by: CIDOB Share of Spanish Population (%) Circle Size = Total Sales in focus CIDOB 03 . OCTOBER 2012 CIDOB • Barcelona Centre for International 2012 for September Affairs. Centre CIDOB • Barcelona Purchase of Goods From Other Spanish Regions and Abroad (2011) Basque County 28 72 36 64 35,107 M€ 35 65 Asturias Cantabria Navarre 11,580 M€ 55 45 6,918 M€ 14,914 M€ 73 27 Galicia 29 71 25,429 M€ 17 83 Catalonia Castile-Leon La Rioja 97,555 M€ 34,955 M€ 29 71 6,498 M€ Aragon 67 33 26,238 M€ Madrid 79,749 M€ 44 56 2 78 Castile-La Mancha Valencia 19 81 12 88 23,540 M€ Extremaura 49 51 45,891 M€ Balearic Islands 8,132 M€ 8,086 M€ 54 46 Murcia 18,952 M€ 56 44 Andalusia 52,482 M€ Canary Islands 35 65 13,474 M€ Purchases from 27,000 to 31,000 € 23,000 to 27,000 € Rest of Spain 19,000 to 23,000 € the world 15,000 to 19,000 € GDP per capita Circle Size = Total Purchase Source: C-Intereg, Expansión and Datacomex Produced by: CIDOB 2 in focus CIDOB 03 .
    [Show full text]
  • Exam Sample Question
    Latin II St. Charles Preparatory School Sample Second Semester Examination Questions PART I Background and History (Questions 1-35) Directions: On the answer sheet cover the letter of the response which correctly completes each statement about Caesar or his armies. 1. The commander-in-chief of a Roman army who had won a significant victory was known as a. dux b. imperator c. signifer d. sagittarius e. legatus 2. Caesar was consul for the first time in the year a. 65 B.C. b. 70 B.C. c. 59 B.C. d. 44 B.C. e. 51 B.C. PART II Vocabulary (Questions 36-85) Directions: On the answer sheet provided cover the letter of the correct meaning for the boldfaced Latin word in the left band column. 36. doctus a. edge b. entrance c. learned d. record e. friendly 37. incipio a. stop b. speaker c. rest d. happen e. begin PART III Prepared Translation, Passage A (Questions 86-95) Directions: On the answer sheet provided cover the letter of the best translation for each Latin sentence or fragment. 86. Gallia est omnis divisa in partes tres. a. The Gauls divided themselves into three parts b. All of Gaul was divided into three parts c. Three parts of Gaul have been divided d. Everyone in Gaul was divided into three parts PART IV Prepared Translation, Passage B (Questions 96-105) Directions: On the answer sheet provided cover the letter of the best translation for each Latin sentence or fragment. 96. Galli se Celtas appellant. Romani autem eos Gallos appellant.
    [Show full text]
  • Celts and the Castro Culture in the Iberian Peninsula – Issues of National Identity and Proto-Celtic Substratum
    Brathair 18 (1), 2018 ISSN 1519-9053 Celts and the Castro Culture in the Iberian Peninsula – issues of national identity and Proto-Celtic substratum Silvana Trombetta1 Laboratory of Provincial Roman Archeology (MAE/USP) [email protected] Received: 03/29/2018 Approved: 04/30/2018 Abstract : The object of this article is to discuss the presence of the Castro Culture and of Celtic people on the Iberian Peninsula. Currently there are two sides to this debate. On one hand, some consider the “Castro” people as one of the Celtic groups that inhabited this part of Europe, and see their peculiarity as a historically designed trait due to issues of national identity. On the other hand, there are archeologists who – despite not ignoring entirely the usage of the Castro culture for the affirmation of national identity during the nineteenth century (particularly in Portugal) – saw distinctive characteristics in the Northwest of Portugal and Spain which go beyond the use of the past for political reasons. We will examine these questions aiming to decide if there is a common Proto-Celtic substrate, and possible singularities in the Castro Culture. Keywords : Celts, Castro Culture, national identity, Proto-Celtic substrate http://ppg.revistas.uema.br/index.php/brathair 39 Brathair 18 (1), 2018 ISSN 1519-9053 There is marked controversy in the use of the term Celt and the matter of the presence of these people in Europe, especially in Spain. This controversy involves nationalism, debates on the possible existence of invading hordes (populations that would bring with them elements of the Urnfield, Hallstatt, and La Tène cultures), and the possible presence of a Proto-Celtic cultural substrate common to several areas of the Old Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Autor: Maria Joana Gomes [email protected] Title: to Be Or
    Guarecer. Revista Electrónica de Estudos Medievais Autor: Maria Joana Gomes [email protected] Title: To be or not be (a Goth): Gothic origins and the construction of identity of Iberian kingdoms (10th-12th centuries) Abstract: The genealogical connection of medieval kings of Spain to a specific people – the Visigoths – became among of the most important tools of legitimation used in the historiography written in the North-western Iberian Christian kingdoms. Chronicles and documents written under the direct command of king Alfonso III of Asturias affirmed the Gothic origins of the Asturian dynasty, an ideological current known as Neogothicism. In the same manner, and throughout the 11th-12th centuries, chronicles and documents issued by kings of León, successors of the Asturian kings, also used continuity with the Gothic past to consolidate the power of that dynasty. However, texts coming from other geographies, namely the territories of the recently formed kingdom of Portugal, opted for an alternative view of the past and of the origins of the realm, establishing other kinds of connections to validate the emergence of this new political entity. The aim of this paper is to show how continuity and discontinuity were used as an identity mark and a legitimation strategy in a set of texts written between the 10th and 12th centuries in Asturias, León and Portugal. Keywords: Visigoths; Neogothicism; Asturias; León; Portugal; Continuity; Discontinuity; Historiography. 23 Maria Joana Gomes Resumo: As relações genealógicas dos reis ibéricos com os visigóticos foi uma das ferramentas de legitimação usada pelos historiógrafos dos reinos cristãos do noroeste da Península Ibérica. As crónicas escritas na corte de Afonso III das Astúrias afirmaram a origem gótica da dinastia régias asturiana, uma corrente ideológica que se tornou conhecida como Neogoticismo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Asturica Augusta
    Today, as yesterday, communication and mobility are essential in the configuration of landscapes, understood as cultural creations. The dense networks of roads that nowadays crisscross Europe have a historical depth whose roots lie in its ancient roads. Under the might of Rome, a network of roads was designed for the first time that was capable of linking points very far apart and of organizing the lands they traversed. They represent some of the Empire’s landscapes and are testimony to the ways in which highly diverse regions were integrated under one single power: Integration Water and land: Integration Roads of conquest The rural world of the limits ports and trade of the mountains Roads of conquest The initial course of the roads was often marked by the Rome army in its advance. Their role as an instrument of control over conquered lands was a constant, with soldiers, orders, magistrates, embassies and emperors all moving along them. Alesia is undoubtedly one of the most emblematic landscapes of the war waged by Rome’s legions against the peoples that inhabited Europe. Its material remains and the famous account by Caesar, the Gallic Wars, have meant that Alesia has been recognized for two centuries now as a symbol of the expansion of Rome and the resistance of local communities. Alesia is the famous battle between Julius Caesar and Vercingetorix, the Roman army against the Gaulish tribes. The siege of Alesia took place in 52 BC, but its location was not actually discovered until the 19th century thanks to archeological research! Located on the site of the battle itself, in the centre of France, in Burgundy, in the village of Alise-Sainte-Reine, the MuseoParc Alesia opened its doors in 2012 in order to provide the key to understanding this historical event and the historical context, in order to make history accessible to the greatest number of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletonized Microfossils from the Lower–Middle Cambrian Transition of the Cantabrian Mountains, Northern Spain
    Skeletonized microfossils from the Lower–Middle Cambrian transition of the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain SÉBASTIEN CLAUSEN and J. JAVIER ÁLVARO Clausen, S. and Álvaro, J.J. 2006. Skeletonized microfossils from the Lower–Middle Cambrian transition of the Cantabrian Mountains, northern Spain. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (2): 223–238. Two different assemblages of skeletonized microfossils are recorded in bioclastic shoals that cross the Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary in the Esla nappe, Cantabrian Mountains. The uppermost Lower Cambrian sedimentary rocks repre− sent a ramp with ooid−bioclastic shoals that allowed development of protected archaeocyathan−microbial reefs. The shoals yield abundant debris of tube−shelled microfossils, such as hyoliths and hyolithelminths (Torellella), and trilobites. The overlying erosive unconformity marks the disappearance of archaeocyaths and the Iberian Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary. A different assemblage occurs in the overlying glauconitic limestone associated with development of widespread low−relief bioclastic shoals. Their lowermost part is rich in hyoliths, hexactinellid, and heteractinid sponge spicules (Eiffelia), chancelloriid sclerites (at least six form species of Allonnia, Archiasterella, and Chancelloria), cambroclaves (Parazhijinites), probable eoconchariids (Cantabria labyrinthica gen. et sp. nov.), sclerites of uncertain af− finity (Holoplicatella margarita gen. et sp. nov.), echinoderm ossicles and trilobites. Although both bioclastic shoal com− plexes represent similar high−energy conditions, the unconformity at the Lower–Middle Cambrian boundary marks a drastic replacement of microfossil assemblages. This change may represent a real community replacement from hyolithelminth−phosphatic tubular shells to CES (chancelloriid−echinoderm−sponge) meadows. This replacement coin− cides with the immigration event based on trilobites previously reported across the boundary, although the partial infor− mation available from originally carbonate skeletons is also affected by taphonomic bias.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of the Neolithic in Andalusia
    Quaternary International xxx (2017) 1e21 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The beginning of the Neolithic in Andalusia * Dimas Martín-Socas a, , María Dolores Camalich Massieu a, Jose Luis Caro Herrero b, F. Javier Rodríguez-Santos c a U.D.I. de Prehistoria, Arqueología e Historia Antigua (Dpto. Geografía e Historia), Universidad de La Laguna, Campus Guajara, 38071 Tenerife, Spain b Dpto. Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Computacion, Universidad de Malaga, Complejo Tecnologico, Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Malaga, Spain c Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones Prehistoricas de Cantabria (IIIPC), Universidad de Cantabria. Edificio Interfacultativo, Avda. Los Castros, 52. 39005 Santander, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Early Neolithic in Andalusia shows great complexity in the implantation of the new socioeconomic Received 31 January 2017 structures. Both the wide geophysical diversity of this territory and the nature of the empirical evidence Received in revised form available hinder providing a general overview of when and how the Mesolithic substrate populations 6 June 2017 influenced this process of transformation, and exactly what role they played. The absolute datings Accepted 22 June 2017 available and the studies on the archaeological materials are evaluated, so as to understand the diversity Available online xxx of the different zones undergoing the neolithisation process on a regional scale. The results indicate that its development, initiated in the middle of the 6th millennium BC and consolidated between 5500 and Keywords: Iberian Peninsula 4700 cal. BC, is parallel and related to the same changes documented in North Africa and the different Andalusia areas of the Central-Western Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Cantabria Y Asturias Seniors 2016·17
    Cantabria y Asturias Seniors 2016·17 7 días / 6 noches Hotel Zabala 3* (Santillana del Mar) € Hotel Norte 3* (Gijón) desde 399 Salida: 11 de junio Precio por persona en habitación doble Suplemento Hab. individual: 150€ ¡TODO INCLUIDO! 13 comidas + agua/vino + excursiones + entradas + guías ¿Por qué reservar este viaje? ¿Quiere conocer Cantabria y Asturias? En nuestro circuito Reserve por sólo combinamos lo mejor de estas dos comunidades para que durante 7 días / 6 noches conozcas a fondo los mejores rincones de la geografía. 50 € Itinerario: Incluimos: DÍA 1º. BARCELONA – CANTABRIA • Asistencia por personal de Viajes Tejedor en el punto de salida. Salida desde Barcelona. Breves paradas en ruta (almuerzo en restaurante incluido). • Autocar y guía desde Barcelona y durante todo el recorrido. Llegada al hotel en Cantabria. Cena y alojamiento. • 3 noches de alojamiento en el hotel Zabala 3* de Santillana del Mar y 2 noches en el hotel Norte 3* de Gijón. DÍA 2º. VISITA DE SANTILLANA DEL MAR y COMILLAS – VISITA DE • 13 comidas con agua/vino incluido, según itinerario. SANTANDER • Almuerzos en ruta a la ida y regreso. Desayuno. Seguidamente nos dirigiremos a la localidad de Santilla del Mar. Histórica • Visitas a: Santillana del Mar, Comillas, Santander, Santoña, Picos de Europa, Potes, población de gran belleza, donde destaca la Colegiata románica del S.XII, declarada Oviedo, Villaviciosa, Lastres, Tazones, Avilés, Luarca y Cudillero. Monumento Nacional. Las calles empedradas y las casas blasonadas, configuran un paisaje • Pasaje de barco de Santander a Somo. urbano de extraordinaria belleza. Continuaremos viaje a la cercana localidad de Comillas, • Guías locales en: Santander, Oviedo y Avilés.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Settlement Patterns in Roman Galicia
    Settlement Patterns in Roman Galicia: Late Iron Age – Second Century AD Jonathan Wynne Rees Thesis submitted in requirement of fulfilments for the degree of Ph.D. in Archaeology, at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London University of London 2012 1 I, Jonathan Wynne Rees confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the changes which occurred in the cultural landscapes of northwest Iberia, between the end of the Iron Age and the consolidation of the region by both the native elite and imperial authorities during the early Roman empire. As a means to analyse the impact of Roman power on the native peoples of northwest Iberia five study areas in northern Portugal were chosen, which stretch from the mountainous region of Trás-os-Montes near the modern-day Spanish border, moving west to the Tâmega Valley and the Atlantic coastal area. The divergent physical environments, different social practices and political affinities which these diverse regions offer, coupled with differing levels of contact with the Roman world, form the basis for a comparative examination of the area. In seeking to analyse the transformations which took place between the Late pre-Roman Iron Age and the early Roman period historical, archaeological and anthropological approaches from within Iberian academia and beyond were analysed. From these debates, three key questions were formulated, focusing on
    [Show full text]
  • The Language(S) of the Callaeci Eugenio R
    e-Keltoi: Journal of Interdisciplinary Celtic Studies Volume 6 The Celts in the Iberian Peninsula Article 16 5-3-2006 The Language(s) of the Callaeci Eugenio R. Luján Martinez Dept. Filología Griega y Lingüística Indoeuropea, Universidad Complutense de Madrid Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/ekeltoi Recommended Citation Luján Martinez, Eugenio R. (2006) "The Language(s) of the Callaeci," e-Keltoi: Journal of Interdisciplinary Celtic Studies: Vol. 6 , Article 16. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/ekeltoi/vol6/iss1/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in e-Keltoi: Journal of Interdisciplinary Celtic Studies by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact open- [email protected]. The Language(s) of the Callaeci Eugenio R. Luján Martínez, Dept. Filología Griega y Lingüística Indoeuropea, Universidad Complutense de Madrid Abstract Although there is no direct extant record of the language spoken by any of the peoples of ancient Callaecia, some linguistic information can be recovered through the analysis of the names (personal names, names of deities, ethnonyms, and place-names) that occur in Latin inscriptions and in ancient Greek and Latin sources. These names prove the presence of speakers of a Celtic language in this area, but there are also names of other origins. Keywords Onomastics, place-names, Palaeohispanic languages, epigraphy, historical linguistics 1. Introduction1 In this paper I will try to provide a general overview of the linguistic situation in ancient Callaecia by analyzing the linguistic evidence provided both by the literary and the epigraphic sources available in this westernmost area of continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducción. Los Astures Y La Religiosidad
    Introducción Los astures y la religiosidad El territorio ocupado por las poblaciones astures, cuyo ámbito geográfico se ex- tendía a uno y otro lado de la cordillera cantábrica (pésicos, luggones y astures pro- piamenre dichos o astures genéricos en suelo de Asturias), acogería a lo largo de los siglos de la Antigüedad, antes y durante la fase de presencia romana en el mismo, a una serie de divinidades y cultos; la implantación, arraigo y desarrollo de los mismos se explica con relativa facilidad a medida que podemos trazar la evolución histórica de la organización de tales comunidades, así como la difusión y aceptación de los dioses integrantes de dicho panteón y de sus correspondientes cultos1. Hemos de partir del hecho de que las peculiaridades que nos presentan las estruc- turas organizativas de esas poblaciones en las diferentes fases de su desarrollo (época prerromana, tiempos romanos y etapa visigoda-cristiana) contextualizarán las carac- terísticas propias de un mundo religioso conectado a las actividades económicas, a las estructuras sociales y políticas, así como al entorno geográfico que habitaban (en un primer momento en un marco exclusivamente rural y, a partir de la presencia romana, matizado por un cierto influjo, no demasiado acusado, de la presencia de algunos, en realidad muy pocos, centros urbanos)2. El tipo de organización administrativa y socio-política de los astures a lo largo de los diferentes siglos de su existencia (prerromana y romana) nos servirá de base para comprender los parámetros de funcionamiento de su religiosidad; junto a ello hemos de tener en cuenta que, durante las centurias anterromanas, el panteón indíge- na apenas rebasaría el ámbito estrictamente local, por lo que únicamente la presencia romana haría posible el arraigo de una religiosidad común, que en cierto sentido amalgamaría (hasta sincretizarlos) los cultos y divinidades propios de cada una de las comunidades prerromanas3.
    [Show full text]