DOCSLIB.ORG

Geopolitics and Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geopolitics and Security 978- 9941- 449- 93- 2 GEOPOLITICS AND SECURITY A NEW STRATEGY FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Edited by Kornely Kakachia, Stefan Meister, Benjamin Fricke The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) is a political foundation of the Federal Republic of Germany. Democracy, peace and justice are the basic principles underlying the activities of KAS at home as well as abroad. The Foundation’s Regional Program South Caucasus conducts projects aiming at: Strengthening democratization processes, Promoting political participation of the people, Supporting social justice and sustainable economic development, Promoting peaceful conflict resolution, Supporting the region’s rapprochement with European structures. The Georgian Institute of Politics (GIP) is a Tbilisi-based non-profit, in- dependent, research and analysis organization founded in early 2011. GIP strives to strengthen the organizational backbone of democratic institutions and promote good governance and development through policy research and advocacy in Georgia. It also encourages public participation in civil soci- ety-building and developing democratic processes in and outside of Georgia. The German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP) is Germany’s network for foreign policy. As an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit membership organization, think tank, and publisher the DGAP has been promoting public debate on foreign policy in Germany for almost 60 years. The DGAP’s think tank undertakes policy-oriented research at the intersection of operational politics, business, scholarship, and the media. More than 30 foreign policy experts work in ten research programs focusing on: transatlantic relations, European integration, Russia/Eurasia, international security policy, energy policy, global economics, the Middle East, and China. Editors: Prof. Dr. Kornely Kakachia, Dr. Stefan Meister, Benjamin Fricke Manuscript Editor: Joseph Larsen Text Design: Irakli Beltadze Cover Design: David Kelberashvili Disclaimer The papers in this volume reflect the personal opinions of the authors and not those of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation or any other organizations, includ- ing the organizations with which the authors are affiliated. © The Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V 2018 © The Georgian Institute of Politics 2018 © The German Council on Foreign Relations 2018 ISBN 978-9941-449-93-2 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Regional Program South Caucasus 9a Akhvlediani Aghmarti, 0103 Tbilisi, Georgia German Council on Foreign Relations Rauchstraße 17-18, 10787 Berlin, Germany Georgian Institute of Politics 3 Akaki Shanidze str. 0179 Tbilisi, Georgia CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Kornely Kakachia, Stefan Meister, Benjamin Fricke...........................6 THE EUROPEAN UNION’S NEW EASTERN PARTNERSHIP POLICY Licínia Simão...................................................................................18 EUROPEAN UNION ENERGY POLICY: THE ROLE OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Brenda Shaffer................................................................................45 RUSSIA’S COOPERATIVE HEGEMONY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: A RETROSPECTIVE ACTUALIZATION OF THE MODEL Andrey Makarychev & Alexandra Yatsyk.........................................74 IN SEARCH OF THE EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE: GEORGIA AFTER THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT Kakha Gogolashvili........................................................................101 AZERBAIJAN’S POLICY TOWARD EU INTEGRATION: UNRECOGNIZED STRATEGIC PARTNER Anar Valiyev..................................................................................128 INFRASTRUCTURE COOPERATION: AZERBAIJAN-GEORGIA–TURKEY Gulmira Rzayeva............................................................................153 PROMISE AND PERIL: THE ARMENIA-RUSSIA-IRAN AXIS Richard Giragosian........................................................................177 THE INTERNAL-EXTERNAL NEXUS IN THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP: CONSEQUENCES OF THE EU’S CRISIS FOR THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Laure Delcour, Hrant Kostanyan....................................................207 THE IMPACT OF THE UKRAINE AND SYRIA CONFLICTS ON THE GEOPOLITICS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS Svante Cornell...............................................................................231 EU GLOBAL STRATEGY, RESILIENCE OF THE EAST EUROPEAN SOCIETIES AND THE RUSSIAN CHALLENGE Nona Mikhelidze............................................................................266 CONCLUSION Kornely Kakachia, Stefan Meister, Benjamin Fricke........................283 5 INTRODUCTION Kornely Kakachia, Stefan Meister, Benjamin Fricke The South Caucasus is a region at the nexus of various economic, political, and energy interests. It is current- ly witnessing some of the most complex and danger- ous events in the world today. It features weak states, direct and proxy wars, and a confluence of great pow- er interests. It is a prism for fundamental challenges to the international system, including separatism, securi- ty, energy transit, and infrastructure. Strategically, the South Caucasus sits at the crossroads of vibrant glob- al markets: Central Asia and China to the east; Turkey and Europe to the west; Russia to the north; and Iran and the Middle East to the south. However, the lack of regional unity and unresolved ‘frozen conflicts’ remain the biggest hurdles to developing a functioning regional security architecture. These conflicts hamper and com- plicate regional efforts toward independence, econom- ic prosperity, and equal and secure co-existence. The greatest single challenge to regional development and security is the absence of a ‘regional identity.’ As stated by Peter Semneby, former EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus, ‘with its ill-defined borders, weak economic links, absence of realization of the region’s po- tential and lack of the ‘us’ feeling of a shared identity, the South Caucasus could not yet be called a coherent region’ (Sammut 2008). In this sense, the South Cauca- 6 sus exists as a ‘region’ only for outside players. This fact undermines regional development and security (German 2012). Moreover, in recent years a new and significant el- ement has been added to the region’s troubled search for equilibrium. As Russia’s economic fortunes improved starting in the late 1990s due to cresting hydrocarbon prices, its policy of reestablishing its sphere of influence grew more assertive, culminating in the formation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) as a counterweight to the European Union (EU). Russia strongly believes the EU is attempting to use its European Neighbourhood Pol- icy (ENP) to spread its norms and values in the region with the aim of expanding its sphere of influence at the expense of Russia. In Moscow’s conception, this is done with an eye toward enlarging the EU and, potentially, NATO. Subsequently, Moscow acts as a spoiler that is determined to prevent the expansion of Western organi- zations into this part of the world. It assumes that any Western actions in the region should have prior approval from the Kremlin.1 Furthermore, the Kremlin has demon- strated its willingness to use any means, including mil- itary intervention and subjugation, to disrupt the inte- gration of the Eastern Partnership countries into the EU. This interventionist approach is exemplified by military intervention in Ukraine and Georgia and by the halted 1 ‘Putin explains why Russia worries about NATO enlargement’, TASS, 21 November 2016, available at: https://www.rbth.com/ news/2016/11/21/putin-explains-why-russia-worries-about-nato-ex- pansion_649687. 7 Association Agreement between the EU and Armenia in 2013 and Armenia’s subsequent integration into the Eur- asian Economic Union. Despite the fact that the EU and Russia are interde- pendent as energy consumers and suppliers, respective- ly, both have different political cultures, mindsets, rules of the game, and tactics for maximizing their regional spheres of influence. For the EU, the South Caucasus rep- resents an alternative to achieve energy diversification vis-à-vis Russian energy supplies. However, it is a tense neighborhood ‘region’ which needs to be stabilized. Rus- sia strives to maintain control over the South Caucasus countries – which it considers to be under its sphere of influence – and to avoid the strategic presence of the EU and NATO. By asserting a sphere of influence vis-à- vis EU, strategists in Moscow hope to prompt a suitably deferential reaction from the West, including, perhaps, regional withdrawal. Moreover, Russia exploits the ex- isting frozen and protracted conflicts, such as Nagorno – Karabakh and the occupied territories of Georgia. Rus- sia´s negative influence is an important obstacle for the region’s Europeanization, hampering the path toward prosperity and further democratization. Consequently, all these conditions impede further regional cooperation and development of a stable regional security architecture. However, viewing the South Caucasus first and fore- most as a geopolitical battleground obscures important layers of a more complex reality. Even as geopolitical and geo-economic conflicts collide in the region, the South 8 Caucasus remains at the margin of EU policy. While the EU’s Eastern Partnership (EaP) supposedly represents an attempt to increase European involvement in domestic developments in the South Caucasus by offering associ- ation and free trade agreements with the EU in exchange for reform, democratization, and gradual adoption of the EU’s legal framework, the EU has not been able to pro- vide strong incentives for reform. Regional elites have had only limited interest in implementing EU-directed re-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transatlantic Relations: the Usa and Canada
    TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS: THE USA AND CANADA The EU, the US and Canada share the values of democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and economic and political freedom, and have overlapping foreign policy and security concerns. Close cooperation and strategic relations with the US and Canada remain a priority for the EU. EU-US FOREIGN POLICY RELATIONS The close cooperation and strategic relations between the European Union and its Member States and the United States are built on common history and a shared set of democratic values. These are key to both partners’ security and prosperity. The EU and the US closely cooperate in a number of foreign policy areas and geographical contexts, such as counter-terrorism, security cooperation, energy cooperation, Russia, Ukraine and the Western Balkans. With the new Biden administration in office since 20 January 2021, new perspectives are opening up, as illustrated in the joint communication from the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of December 2020 on a new transatlantic agenda for global change. This agenda provides an opportunity for a renewed EU-US partnership based on greater engagement, coordination and cooperation in both a multilateral and bilateral context. It will seek to address current foreign affairs and security challenges, such as the global pandemic, economic recession, climate change, trade irritants, the rise of China, the digital transformation and growing technological competition, as well as defend democracy and human rights. INTERPARLIAMENTARY DIALOGUE – THE TRANSATLANTIC LEGISLATORS’ DIALOGUE (TLD) PROCESS Relations between Parliament and the US Congress date back to 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Oct. 6-12, 2020 Further Reproduction Or Distribution Is Subject to Original Copyright Restrictions
    Weekly Media Report –Oct. 6-12, 2020 Further reproduction or distribution is subject to original copyright restrictions. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… EDUCATION: 1. Marine Corps’ Landmark PhD Program Celebrates First Technical Graduate (Marines.mil 7 Oct 20) (Navy.mil 7 Oct 20) (NPS.edu 7 Oct 20) (Military Spot 12 Oct 20) … Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Taylor Vencill When the Marine Corps developed its new Doctor of Philosophy Program (PHDP), the service recognized the need for a cohort of strategic thinkers and technical leaders capable of the applied research and innovative thinking necessary to develop warfighter advantage in the modern, cognitive age. The Technical version of the program, PHDP-T, just celebrated its first graduate, with Maj. Ezra Akin completing his doctorate in operations research from the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Sept. 25. INDUSTRY PARTNERS: 2. Denver Startup Kayhan Space Lands $600k Seed Round for Collision Avoidance Software (ColoradoInno 6 Oct 20) … Nick Greenhalgh Much like on city streets, space traffic can be hectic and near misses are becoming all too common. Just last year, an in-orbit European Space Agency satellite was forced to perform an evasive maneuver to avoid a collision with a SpaceX satellite. Kayhan Space currently provides satellite collision assessment and avoidance support to the Naval Postgraduate School and BlackSky missions. FACULTY: 3. Will Armenia and Azerbaijan Fight to the Bitter End? [AUDIO INTERVIEW] (English News Highlights 5 Oct 20) Armenia and Azerbaijan accuse each other of attacking civilian areas as the deadliest fighting in the South Caucasus region for more than 25 years continues. KAN's Mark Weiss spoke with South Caucasus expert Brenda Shaffer, formerly a professor at Haifa University and now at the US Navy Postgraduate University.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. South Caucasus Strategy and Azerbaijan
    THE U.S. SOUTH CAUCASUS STRATEGY AND AZERBAIJAN This article analyzes the evolution of U.S. foreign policy in the South Cauca- sus through three concepts, “soft power”, “hard power” and “smart power” which have been developed under the administrations of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively. The authors also aim to identify how the US strategy towards this region has been perceived in Azerbaijan, which, due to its geographical position, energy resources and geopolitical environment, is one of the “geopolitical pivots of Eurasia”. Inessa Baban & Zaur Shiriyev* * Inessa Baban is a Ph.D candidate in geopolitics at Paris-Sorbonne University of France. She is a former visiting scholar at Center for Strategic Studies under the President of Azerbaijan. Zaur Shiriyev is a foreign policy analyst at the same think tank. The views expressed in this article are entirely personal. 93 VOLUME 9 NUMBER 2 INESSA BABAN & ZAUR SHIRIYEV he U.S. strategy towards the South Caucasus has become one of the most controversial issues of American foreign policy under the Obama administration. Most American experts argue that because of the current priorities of the U.S. government, the South Caucasus region does not get the attention that it merits. Even if they admit that none of U.S.’ interests in the Caucasus “fall under the vital category”1 there is a realization that Washington must reconsider its policy towards this region which matters geopolitically, economically and strategically. The South Caucasus, also referred as Transcaucasia, is located between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, neighboring Central Asia to the east, the Middle East to the south, and Eastern Europe to the west, hence connecting Europe to Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan's Cooperation with Israel Goes Beyond Iran Tensions by Brenda Shaffer
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2067 Azerbaijan's Cooperation with Israel Goes Beyond Iran Tensions by Brenda Shaffer Apr 16, 2013 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Brenda Shaffer Brenda Shaffer is an adjunct professor at the Center for Eurasian, Russian, and East European Studies at Georgetown University and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center. Brief Analysis Azerbaijan has ample, independent strategic reasons for its cooperation with Israel and poor relations with Tehran, notwithstanding the recent spike in Iranian tensions. n recent years, Israel and Azerbaijan have intensified their security cooperation and military trade. At the same I time, tensions between Azerbaijan and Iran have increased. Yet these two developments have been largely independent of each other, despite Tehran's efforts to promote misconceptions to the contrary. ISRAELI-AZERBAIJANI RELATIONS I srael recognized Azerbaijan's independence in 1991 and opened an embassy there in 1993. Since then, several Israeli delegations have visited the country: in 1997, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu met with then-president Heydar Aliyev; in 2009, three Israeli ministers and fifty businessmen joined President Shimon Peres to visit current president Ilham Aliyev, with whom Peres is close; and former foreign minister Avigdor Liberman visited in February 2010 and April 2012. Baku has not reciprocated by opening an embassy in Israel, citing fears that Muslim-majority states in the UN would vote unfavorably on its conflict with Armenia over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. Yet several Azerbaijani officials have visited Israel, including Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources Huseyn Bagirov (December 2002 and November 2006), Minister of Communications and Information Technologies Ali Abbasov (November 2003), Minister of Emergency Situations Kemaleddin Heydarov (March 2007), and Transportation Minister Ziya Mammadov (June 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Goes to the Polls | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 792 Azerbaijan Goes to the Polls by Brenda Shaffer Oct 14, 2003 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Brenda Shaffer Brenda Shaffer is an adjunct professor at the Center for Eurasian, Russian, and East European Studies at Georgetown University and a nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Global Energy Center. Brief Analysis he Republic of Azerbaijan, a secular, predominately Shii-populated state, will hold presidential elections on T October 15, 2003. The state borders Iran, produces significant quantities of oil and gas, and conducts a pro- American foreign policy. The capital, Baku, maintains extremely close ties with Turkey, including military cooperation, and is friendly to other U.S. allies, including Israel. The imminent presidential elections represent a turning point for Azerbaijan because the current president, Heydar Aliyev -- who has led Azerbaijan through most of the last three decades -- is not a candidate. The leading candidates are Ilham Aliyev (Azerbaijans current prime minister, son of the current president, and former first vice-president of the state oil company) and Isa Gambar (a leading opposition figure who heads the Musavat Party). Over the last decade, Washington has had remarkable success in establishing a U.S. presence in the Caspian region in various spheres (e.g., economic, political, military). Neither of the main presidential candidates is expected to alter Azerbaijans primary foreign policy decisions; the countrys pro-American orientation will continue regardless of the election results. Election Conduct and Implications As with most of the other states of the Caucasus and Central Asia, the democratization of Azerbaijan has not progressed as Washington had hoped it would when the Soviet Union first began to dissolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Relations and Security Governance
    THE TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONSHIP AND THE FUTURE GLOBAL GOVERNANCE ISSN 2281-5252 WORKING PAPER 41 | OCTOBER 2014 Historically, the system designed to ensure largely as a consequence of Europe’s modest international security has its roots in the evo- hard power and lack of strategic cohesion. On lution of the European-centred the contrary, if centripetal dynamics balance of power into the prevail, the Europeans can make transatlantic-promoted use not only of their indi- liberal order. Because vidual assets to address the liberal order functional threats is so depend- such as terrorism ent on Western and regional crises (US) power, but also exploit the emerging Transatlantic Relations the soft power multipolar- potential of the ity undeni- and Security Governance EU, whereby ably poses a US power gains challenge to greater out- it. Yet, even reach and im- the most res- pact. Because US tive among power is still so the non-West- Riccardo Alcaro and strong and the US- ern powers such European partnership as China and Rus- Ondrej Ditrych still enduring, the capac- sia have a stake in its ity of transatlantic relations endurance, meaning that to shape security governance multipolarity is not intrinsically in- has not vanished. Multipolarity has compatible with the liberal order. If centrifu- made the use of that capacity a more compli- gal dynamics prevail, the transatlantic ability cated exercise, but not necessarily a less effec- to shape security governance will diminish, tive one. THIS PROJECT HAS RECEIVED FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION’S SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME FOR RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND DEMONSTRATION UNDER GRANT AGREEMENT NO 612782 Transatlantic Relations and Security Governance Riccardo Alcaro and Ondrej Ditrych* EU US Governance International security Multipolarity Introduction “Governance” is a term of recent conceptualisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Brenda Shaffer Policy Recommendations
    U.S. POLICY TOWARD THE CASPIAN REGION: RECOMMENDATIONS BRENDA SHAFFER U.S. Policy toward the Caspian Region: Recommendations for the Bush Administration Brenda Shaffer Dr. Brenda Shaffer is Research Director of the Caspian Studies Program at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. * * * EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE CASPIAN REGION: ADVANCEMENT OF U.S. NATIONAL As the Bush Administration assesses how to INTERESTS best promote U.S. national interests through its policies toward the Caspian region, it could A number of U.S. national interests can be benefit from considering the following policy advanced through the successful articulation proposals and guidelines and taking note of a of policies in the Caspian region, which is few lessons derived from the results of the understood to encompass the Caspian littoral previous Administration’s policies.1 The states (Russia, Iran, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, resources of the Caspian region can make an and Turkmenistan) as well as neighboring important contribution to United States energy states that belong to the security and energy security. However, the importance of the transport picture of the sea basin (Georgia, region extends beyond energy; extensive ties Armenia, Turkey, and Uzbekistan). These with the states of the Caspian region can interests are: contribute to improvement of Washington’s relations with the Muslim world and 1. Viability and stability of global energy encourage U.S.-oriented regimes and open supplies and diversification of supply societies. In order to better advance these from areas other than the Persian Gulf. aims, the U.S., first and foremost, needs to As President Bush has noted: “Diversity conduct a comprehensive and coherent policy.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Transatlantic Relationship
    The European Union’s Transatlantic Relationship EU Diplomacy Papers 2 / 2006 Günter Burghardt Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies www.coleurope.eu Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies EU Diplomacy Papers 2/2006 The European Union's Transatlantic Relationship Günter Burghardt © Günter Burghardt 2006 Dijver 11 | BE-8000 Bruges, Belgium | Tel. +32 (0)50 477 251 | Fax +32 (0)50 477 250 | E-mail [email protected] | www.coleurope.eu/ird Günter Burghardt About the Author Dr. Günter Burghardt served as the European Union’s Ambassador in Washington, DC, from 1999 to 2004. Earlier, he had held positions at the European Commission as Political Director and Director General for External Relations as well as Deputy Chief of Staff of Commission President Jacques Delors. Dr. Burghardt teaches as a guest professor at the College of Europe in Bruges and at the European Institute of the Law Faculty of Ghent University. He joined the transatlantic law firm of Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP as a Senior Counsel. Editorial Team: Nike Bönnen, Mathieu Briens, Sieglinde Gstöhl, Dieter Mahncke, Kevin O'Connell Dijver 11 | BE-8000 Bruges, Belgium | Tel. +32 (0)50 477 251 | Fax +32 (0)50 477 250 | E-mail [email protected] | www.coleurope.eu/ird Views expressed in the EU Diplomacy Papers are those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect positions of either the series editors or the College of Europe. 2 EU Diplomacy Papers 2/2006 Abstract Since its inception post-World War II, the European unification process has been embedded within a strong transatlantic dimension [Marshall-Plan, Truman/ EisenhowerMonnet, Kennedy/Hallstein].
    [Show full text]
  • “Iran and Its Neighbors: Diverging Views on a Strategic Region”
    SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Eugene Whitlock (Ed.) “Iran and Its Neighbors: Diverging Views on a Strategic Region” July 2003 Berlin © Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2003 All rights reserved SWP Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Ludwigkirchplatz 3−4 10719 Berlin Telephone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org [email protected] Table of Contents 5 Foreword – Johannes Reissner 7 Iran and the Middle East 9 The Infernal Triangle: Iran, Israel, and the United States – Samuel W. Lewis 15 Iran’s Relationship to Its Neighbors in Central Asia and the Caucasus 17 Iran’s Role in the South Caucasus and Caspian Region: Diverging Views of the U.S. and Europe – Brenda Shaffer 23 Iran in the Caucasus, Caspian and Central Asia: Lessons for Western Strategy – Edmund Herzig 29 U.S. and Iranian Policy in Afghanistan – Barnett R. Rubin 35 Iran and the Problem of Proliferation 37 Dealing with Iran’s Nuclear Program – Michael Eisenstadt 42 Iran, the Bomb, and the Future of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty – Oliver Thränert 53 The Potential for Iran to Provoke Further Nuclear Proliferation in the Middle East – Patrick Clawson 57 The Role of Iran and the Region for Global Energy Supply 59 Iran’s Oil and Gas Development and the Effect of U.S. Economic Sanctions – James A. Placke 65 Why Iran Is Key for Europe’s Security of Energy Supply – Friedemann Müller 70 Post-War Iraq and Iran’s Petroleum Sector – Joe Barnes and
    [Show full text]
  • EU – US Risk Policy in the European Neighborhood: the Cases of Moldova and Georgia
    EU – US Risk Policy in the European Neighborhood: The cases of Moldova and Georgia Ingo Peters and Jan Bittner Center for Transatlantic Foreign and Security Policy Studies Department of Politics and Social Sciences Freie Universität Berlin [email protected] forthcoming in: Kari Möttöla (ed.), Transatlantic Relations and Global Governance. Washington DC: Johns Hopkins University, SAIS, Center for Transatlantic Relations Introduction 1 1. Risks and Risk Policy in the European Neighborhood 2 1.1 Risks in the Post-Soviet Space 2 The Question of Ethnicity and Citizenship 3 Economic Spaces 3 The Role of Russia 4 1.2 Transatlantic Risk Perception and Risk Policy 4 The EU Approach 5 The US Approach 6 2. Case A: Moldova 7 2.1 The Risks of Weak Statehood 8 Transnistrian Conflict 9 Russian Troops in Transnistria 9 2.2 EU Policy towards Moldova 10 Following a Structure-centered Approach 11 Actor-centered Elements 12 2.3 US Policy towards Moldova – Structure-centered Approach 13 Actor-centered Elements 14 3. Case B: Georgia 15 3.1 The Risks of Weak Statehood 15 Conflicts in South Ossetia and Abkhazia 16 Russian presence in Georgia 17 3.2 EU Policy towards Georgia 18 Structure-centered Approach 18 Actor-centered Elements 19 3.3 The US Policy 20 Actor-centered Elements 21 4. Conclusions 21 Introduction The security environment of the transatlantic community has changed dramatically since the end of the East-West conflict. The main security challenges are no longer the threat of major wars waged by hostile states, but security risks posed by non-state actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Influence in the South Caucasus and the Surrounding Region
    IRANIAN INFLUENCE IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AND THE SURROUNDING REGION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE AND EURASIA OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION DECEMBER 5, 2012 Serial No. 112–192 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 77–164PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:38 Jan 03, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\EE\120512\77164 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DAN BURTON, Indiana GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DANA ROHRABACHER, California Samoa DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois BRAD SHERMAN, California EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RON PAUL, Texas RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia CONNIE MACK, Florida THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska BEN CHANDLER, Kentucky MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas BRIAN HIGGINS, New York TED POE, Texas ALLYSON SCHWARTZ, Pennsylvania GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida CHRISTOPHER S. MURPHY, Connecticut JEAN SCHMIDT, Ohio FREDERICA WILSON, Florida BILL JOHNSON, Ohio KAREN BASS, California DAVID RIVERA, Florida WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts MIKE KELLY, Pennsylvania DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island TIM GRIFFIN, Arkansas TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina ANN MARIE BUERKLE, New York RENEE ELLMERS, North Carolina ROBERT TURNER, New York YLEEM D.S.
    [Show full text]
  • EURR 5108 / PSCI 5103 Canada-EU Relations: Summer Module Online Course
    Carleton University Late Summer 2021 Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies Department of Political Science https://carleton.ca/polisci/ EURR 5108 / PSCI 5103 Canada-EU Relations: Summer Module Online course Instructor: Achim Hurrelmann Office Hours: Mondays, 2:00-4:00pm (Zoom, access via Brightspace) Email: [email protected] Twitter: @achimhurrelmann Please note: This online course combines asynchronous and synchronous methods of course delivery. Asynchronous online components (lectures, activities, quizzes) must be completed on Brightspace between July 5 and August 2, 2021. Synchronous online meetings will take place using the Zoom videoconferencing platform between August 3 and August 6, 2021 (10am-12pm and 1-3pm each day). Both parts of the course are mandatory. Course description: This course examines the relations between Canada and the EU, with attention to policy issues affecting the relationship and common policy challenges. After introductory sessions on external policy making in Canada and the EU, it will examine various aspects of the bilateral relationship, including trade, security cooperation, as well as environmental and energy policies. Particular emphasis will be placed on recent developments and debates in Canada-EU relations, such as the (provisional) entry into force and implementation of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA), the impact of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU (“Brexit”), and the COVID-19 pandemic. Guest speakers from Global Affairs Canada and the EU Delegation to Canada will be brought into the seminar. At the end of the course, students will be familiar with the main scholarly debates about external policy making in Canada and the EU.
    [Show full text]