B-3772 [1-6]

Indian J. Anim. Res., AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION CENTRE Print ISSN:0367-6722 / Online ISSN:0976-0555 www.arccjournals.com/www.ijaronline.in

Efficient pollinators of threatened taxa, Sarpagandha (Rauvolfia serpentina) under North Indian conditions

Vadde Anoosha1, Sumit Saini* and H.D. Kaushik2 Department of Entomology CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125 044, Haryana, India. Received: 22-12-2018 Accepted: 29-12-2018 DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3772 ABSTRACT An experiment was carried out to investigate the diversity, abundance and pollination efficiency of different visitors/ pollinators of Rauvolfia serpentina (Sarpagandha) during 2014 and 2015. This experiment was conducted at Medicinal Section, Department of G &PB, CCSHAU, Hisar. Sarpagandha flowers attracted wide varieties of belonging to 4 orders, 10 families, 16 genera and 17 species. Among them nine belongs to order Lepidoptera, one Coleoptera, two Diptera, and two . Lepidopterans came out to be the most abundant pollinators of this crop. Peak abundance of major insect pollinators was recorded at 1000h-1200h while minimum abundance was recorded at 0600h -0800h. zonata had the highest number of loose pollen grains, 23.50 (‘000), sticking to its body followed by Papilio demoleus and Pieris sp. Papilio demoleus was reported as most efficient pollinator followed by Amegilla zonata and Pieris sp. based on the pollination index. Long proboscis of lepidopterans i.e., Papilio demoleus and small sized hymenopterans i.e., Amegilla zonata plays key role in pollination of Sarpagandha. Conservation of these pollinators in natural ecosystem is must for pollination of these threatened taxa. Key words: Insect pollinators, Pollination efficiency, Pollen grains, Sarpagandha.

INTRODUCTION attained a great importance as medicinal plant (Pullaiah, Pollination is one of the principal mechanisms in 2006). Roots and leaves of this plant contain several alkaloids the maintenance and conservation of biodiversity in general (Verma et al., 2010) out of those resperine is pharma- life of earth. Pollinators provide an ecosystem service that cologically most important (Blackwell, 1990). It has enables plants to produce fruits and seeds. Over 80 per cent lanceolate shaped pale green leaves in whorls of 3 to 5 leaves. of total pollination activities are performed by insects and It also has white and pink coloured flowers, having filiform (Klein et al., 2007). Around 30 percent of human food style and stigma is bifid having bilocular ovary with two is derived from pollinated crops (O’ Toole, 1993). ovules in each locule. The flowers of Sarpagandha have Pollinating insects are widely found in insect orders narrow and long tubular corolla. Such flowers make them a Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Thysanoptera, Diptera and perfect representative of psychophilous pollination syndrome Hymenoptera (Singh and Garg, 2003). The structure of the negating all other syndromes (Wadhwa and Sihag, 2012). flowers, their degree of self-fertility and their arrangement Protogynous conditions of sarpagandha flowers need insect on the plant determines the extent to which a plant is pollinators for cross-pollination. Fruit is drupe, ovoid and dependent on insects for pollen transfer (Free, 1993; purplish black in color when it reaches maturity. Lot of Williams, 1994; Richards, 2001, Devi S et al., 2015). research work done on commercial crops as bee forage but Sarpagandha (Rauvolfia serpentina (Linn.) Benth., scanty information is available on underutilized medicinal ex Kurz.) is an evergreen shrub that belongs to the family plants. These plants also have important as medicinal crop Apocynaceae (Endress and Bruyns, 2000). Sarpagandha is and knowledge of their mode of pollination and pollinators a threatened species found in the sub-tropical regions. It is the need of the hour. They also serve as minor bee forage grows wild in India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, in the areas of scarcity. Keeping this idea in view, the present Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia. Within India, it is grown study was undertaken to determine the efficient pollinators in almost all parts up to an altitude of about 1000 m above of sarpagandha. sea level. Five species of sarpagandha (viz., R. hookeri, R. MATERIALS AND METHODS micrantha, R. serpentina, R. tetraphylla and R. Verticillata) Pollination studies in sarpagandha were carried out have been recorded in India, of which R. Serpentina has at Research Farm, Department of Genetics and Plant *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected] 1MPRNL, LBS Building IARI, New Delhi. 2CCS HAU, Hisar. 2 INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India RESULTS AND DISCUSSION during 2014 and 2015. Diversity of insect visitors/ pollinators: Sarpagandha flowers (Fig 1) attracted 17 species of insects. Out of these, Diversity of insect pollinators: Hand net with 30 cm ring Lepidopterans were the major floral visitors comprising from diameter was used to collect insects visiting the flowers three families viz., Papilionidae (Papilio demoleus and throughout blooming period (Anoosha et al., 2016, 2018a, Papilio polytes), (Fig 2) Pieridae (Eurema hecabe, Pieris 2018b). Captured insects were preserved as dry specimens sp., Anaphaeis sp., Pieris canidia, Belenois aurota, Pieris and were got identified from Division of Entomology, IARI, brassicae and Colotis etrida and Hesperiidae (Pelopidas sp.). New Delhi and a record of the flower visitors was prepared. They were followed in order of diversity by Dipterans from Abundance of insect pollinator: Abundance of most two families viz., Sarcophagidae (Sarcophaga sp.) and frequent insect visitors (number of visitors/m2 branch of a Syrphidae (Eristalinus obscuritarsis) and two species from tree/5minutes) was recorded from five randomly selected two families of Hymenoptera viz., Vespidae (Polistes branches with the help of stop watch. The abundance was olivaceus) and (Amegilla zonata) (Fig 3) and recorded at two hourly intervals, starting from Coleopteran from family Coccinellidae (Coccinella commencement to the cessation of insect activity and septempunctata). Out of 17 insects all were top foragers repeated at weekly intervals on the experimental plant except A. zontata which was side forager (Table 1). These (Anoosha et al., 2016, 2018a, 2018b). findings are in agreement with those of Wadhwa and Sihag (2012) who recorded 19 insect species visiting the blossoms Foraging Rate: Foraging rate of major pollinators was of sarpagandha. recorded in terms of number of flowers visited/minute. Ten observations were taken for each pollinator species. For this, Abundance of insect visitors/pollinators: Three insect observations were recorded at 2 hours interval from 0600 h species are major visitors of sarpangandha bloom. They were to 1800 h on a day and were repeated weekly interval during belonging to Lepidoptera (2), and Hymenoptera (1). Among blooming period. Loose pollen grains sticking on insect visitors: Insects were collected gently by forceps from the flowers to avoid shaking of body, and the hind legs of those pollinators which collected the pollen were amputated. Insects were captured at the time of their peak activity and were kept in 70% alcohol in vials. They were shaken vigorously to wash out pollen grains from its body. Ten samples were taken for each pollinator species. The numbers of pollen grains were counted with the help of a haemocytometer under the Fig 1: Flowers of Sarpagandha. microscope (15 x 10 magnifications). The identity of sarpagandha pollen was confirmed by using standard pollen slides (Anoosha et al., 2017). Number of pollen grains = pollen grain count x dilution/ number of squares (1mm2) counted Pollination efficiency of major insect pollinators: Comparative pollination efficiency of different insect pollinators was calculated on the basis of their relative abundance and foraging behaviour parameters such as Fig 2: Papilio demoleus. abundance, foraging rate and the number of loose pollen grains sticking to their bodies by using the following formula: Pollination efficiency = Abundance X foraging Rate X number of loose pollen grains sticking on the body of the bee Abundance and Foraging Rate were analysed in randomized block design and the results were compared. Loose pollen grains present on each species were calculated and compared using Completely Randomized Design (Snedecor and Cochran, 1989). Three factorial statistical analyses was done using OPSTAT software (Sheoran et al., 1998). Fig 3: Amegilla zonata. Vol. Issue , () Table 1: Diversity of insect visitors/pollinators of R. serpentina (Sarpagandha). Order Family Insect Species IP/IV Working Behaviour Lepidoptera Papilionidae Papilio demoleus Linnaeus IP T Papilio polytes Linnaeus IP T Pieridae Pieris sp. IP T Anaphaeis sp. IP T Pieris canidia Linnaeus IP T Belenois aurota Fabricius IV T Pieris brassicae Linnaeus IP T Colotis etrida (Boisduval) IV T Hesperiidae Pelopidas sp. IV T Coleoptera Coccinellidae Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus IV T Hymenoptera Apidae Amegilla zonata (Linnaeus) IP T and S Vespidae Polistes olivaceus De Geer IV T Formicidae Monomorium sp. IV S Diptera Sarcophagidae Sarcophaga sp. IP T Syrphidae Eristalinus obscuritarsis (de Meijere) IV S Eristalis sp. IV S Hemiptera Scutellaridae Chrysocoris stolli Wolff IV T *IP –Insect Pollinator and IV – Insect Visitor, T – Top and S - Side

Lepidopterans, maximum mean population was of P. From the present pollination study, it is evident that demoleus (3.70 insects/m2 branch/5min) followed by that of highest pooled mean abundance of P. demoleus, Pieris sp. Pieris sp. (1.23 insects/m2 branch/5min (Table 2). In and A. zonata were reported during 2nd week of flowering Hymenoptera, mean population of A. zonata was (1.83 bees/ on Sarpagandha flowers. Irrespective of different day hours, m2 branch/5 min). significantly maximum number of P demoleus was recorded Time and week wise, the highest population of P. from sarpagandha flowers followed by A. zonata and Pieris demoleus (6.40 insects/m2 branch/5min) was recorded at sp. Peak abundance of P. demoleus, A.zonata and Pieris sp. 1000h -1200h during 2nd week of flowering which was was recorded at 1000h-1200h irrespective of weeks. significantly different with 1st week (4.60 insects/m2 branch/ Minimum abundance was recorded at 0600h -0800h (Table 5min) and 3rd week (5.00 insects/m2 branch/5min). In case 2 and 3). of Pieris sp. maximum population (2.60 insects/m2 branch/ Similarly, Wadhwa and Sihag (2012) observed that 5min) was recorded at 1000h -12000h during both 2nd and P. demoleus was most abundant pollinator and also found 3rd week which was significantly different with 1st week (1.80 abundance of insect visitors of sarpagandha were low at the insects/m2 branch/5min) (Table 2). In case of Hymenoptera, time of commencement and cessation of the flowering and highest population of A. zonata (4.40 bees/m2 branch/5min) high during peak flowering period. These reports were in was recorded at 1000h-1200h during 2nd week of flowering line with present findings as highest population of all major which was significantly different with 1st week (3.60 bees/ insect pollinators were recorded during 2nd week of flowering m2 branch/5min) and 3rd week (3.80 bees/m2 branch/5min). which was significantly different with 1st week and 3rd week. Highest pooled mean abundance (3.70 insects/m2 Charnov, (1976) and Pyke et al. (1977) stated that during branch/5min) was recorded in p. demoleus followed by A. peak flowering more pollen and nectar were available which zonata (1.83 bees/m2 branch/5min). Lowest pooled mean simultaneously attract more pollinators similar findings were abundance was recorded in Pieris sp. (1.23 insects/m2 recorded in the present study. branch/5min). P. demoleus was reported as most abundant During 2015, similar trend followed as of previous pollinator followed by A. zonata and Pieris sp. these findings year. Minimum activity of both lepidopterans (P. demoleus got support from Wadhwa and Sihag (2012) where and Pieris sp.) was recorded between 0600h - 0800h and lepidopterous insect, P. demoleus was most abundant peak activity was recorded at 1000h – 1200h irrespective of followed by P. brassicae. Similar findings were also reported weeks (Table 3). Highest pooled mean abundance (3.47 by Patil et al., (2008) in pollination studies of brinjal. insects/m2 branch/5min) was recorded in P. demoleus Loose pollen grains on the body of insect visitors/ followed by A. zonata (1.85 bees/m2 branch/5min). Lowest pollinators during 2014 and 2015: Significant differences pooled mean abundance was recorded in Pieris sp. (1.53 were found among the number of loose pollen grains (‘000) insects/m2 branch/5min). sticking to the body of different foragers of three insect 4 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH lues. lues. Abundance of insect on visitors/pollinators Sarpagandha flowers during 2014. Abundance of insect on visitors/pollinators Sarpagandha flowers during 2015. Table Table 2: Each value represents mean of 5 observations. *Figures in parentheses are square root transformed va Table Table 3: Each value represents mean of 5 observations. *Figures in parentheses are square root transformed va Vol. Issue , () species during 2014 (Table 4). A. zonata (21.50) had the entrapped the maximum number of pollen grains (‘000) highest loose pollen grains on their body followed by P. followed by P. demoleus (14.00) and Pieris sp. (11.50) demoleus and Pieris sp. (12.50). In the year 2015, (Table 5). Abundance of P. demoleus (3.58) was highest significantly the highest mean number of loose pollen grains followed by A. zonata (1.84), while the abundance of Pieris (‘000) carried by A. zonata (23.50) followed by P. demoleus sp. was least (1.38) and the foraging rate of P. demoleus (15.50) and Pieris sp. (10.50) (Table 4). (23.24) was highest followed by A. zonata (8.05), while The pooled mean over two years revealed that foraging rate of Pieris sp. was least (6.34). significantly highest number of loose pollen grains (‘000) Pollination index of P. demoleus (1164.78) was entrapped by the A. zonata (22.50) followed by P. demoleus highest followed by A. zonata (333.27) and Pieris sp. (14.00) and Pieris sp. (11.50). Present findings are in (100.61). Hence, it was observed that P. demoleus came out agreement with Wadhwa and Sihag (2012) who reported that to be most efficient pollinator of Sarpagandha. Other pollen grains carried by the body of P. demoleus were pollinators with relatively lower ranking in pollination maximum followed by P. brassicae in sarpagandha. efficiency were A. zonata and Pieris sp. in descending order. Pollination efficiency of major insect visitors/ pollinators: These findings are in agreement with those of Wadhwa and Pollination efficiency of major visitors/pollinators foraging Sihag (2012) who reported that P. demoleus was the most on Sarpagandha flowers revealed that A. zonata (22.50) efficient pollinator based on the pollination index. It is concluded that Psychophilous mode of Table 4: Loose pollen grains (‘000) sticking on insect visitors/ pollination is prevalent due to the tubular flower structure pollinators during 2014 and 2015. of Sarpagandha. Tubular flowers easily located by Insect species 2014 2015 Pooled mean lepidopteran pollinators of having long proboscis to draw Papilio demoleus 12.50 15.50 14.00 the nectar from flowers. Small body sized hymenopterans Amegilla zonata 21.50 23.50 22.50 have advantage over large ones due to the tubular structure. Pieris sp. 12.50 10.50 11.50 In this present study it was reported that long proboscis Mean 15.50 16.50 — lepidopterans i.e., P. demoleus and small sized Factor Insect Year Insect X Year hymenopterans i.e., A. zonata plays key role in pollination SEm (±) 1.12 0.92 1.59 of sarpagandha. Conservation of these pollinators in C.D. 3.20 NS NS natural ecosystem is must for pollination of these Each value represents mean of 10 observations. threatened taxa.

Table 5: Pollination efficiency of major insect pollinators. Insect Species Abundance Foraging Loose pollen grains Pollination index Pollination Rate sticking on the body (abundance x foraging efficiency (Rank) of insect species(‘000) rate x loose pollen grains) Papilio demoleus 3.58 23.24 14.00 1164.78 1st Amegilla zonata 1.84 8.05 22.50 333.27 2nd Pieris sp. 1.38 6.34 11.50 100.61 3rd

REFERENCES Anoosha, V., Saini, S. and Yadav, S. (2017). Insect pollinators and their pollination efficiency in medicinally potential tree, Lasora (Cordia myxa L.). Indian Journal of Ecology, 44 (special issue 5): 532-535. Anoosha, V., Saini, S. Kaushik, H. D. and Yadav, S. (2018a). Species richness and Abundance of major insect pollinators on Aonla, (Phyllanthus emblica L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(8): 1256-1263. Anoosha, V., Saini, S., Kaushik, H. D. and Yadav, S. (2018b). Diversity of insect pollinators on medicinal tree, Baheda (Terminalia bellirica Roxb.) in southern Haryana. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 6(4): 429-432. Anoosha, V., Yadav, S. Kaushik, H. D. and Saini, S. (2016). Diversity and abundance of pollinator fauna on underutilized fruit, Bael ( Aegle marmelos (L) Corr.). Indian Journal of Ecology, 43 (special issue 2): 738-742. Blackwell, W. H. (1990). Significant medicinal plants. In: Poisonous and Medicinal Plants. Prentice Hall, Inc, pp: 281-283. Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9: 129-136. Devi, S., Gulati, R., Tehri, K., and Poonia, A. (2015). The pollination biology of onion (Allium cepa L.)-A Review. Agricultural Reviews, 36(1). Endress, M. E. and Bruyns, P. V. (2000). A revised classification of the Apocynaceae. Botanical Reviews, 66(1):1–56. Free, J. B. (1993). Insect Pollination of Crops (2nd edn.). Academic Press, London. U. K. 684 p. Klein, A. M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C. and Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 274: 303-313. O’Toole, C. (1993). Diversity of native bees and agroecosystems. In: Hymenoptera and Biodiversity (Eds. J. La Salle and I.D. Gauld), CAB. International, Oxon, UK. pp: 169-196. 6 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH Patil, S. B., Merwade, M. N., Vyakaranahal, B. S., and Deshpande, V. K. (2008). Effect of pollination time and crossing ratio on seed yield and quality of brinjal hybrid under Dharwad region of Karnataka. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42(1): 7-12. Pullaiah, T. (2006). Encyclopedia of World Medicinal Plants. 4: 1663-1667. Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. and Charnov, E. L. (1977). Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52: 137-154. Richards, A. J. 2001. Does low biodiversity resulting from modern agricultural practice affect crop pollination and yield. Annals of Botany London, 88: 165-172. Sheoran, O.P; Tonk, D.S; Kaushik, L.S; Hasija, R.C and Pannu, R.S (1998). Statistical Software Package for Agricultural Research Workers. Recent Advances in information theory, Statistics & Computer Applications [D.S. Hooda & R.C. Hasija] Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar (139-143). Singh, R. and Garg, R. (2003). Role of honey bees in sustainable food production. Indian Bee Journal. 65 (1-2): 61-67. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Companny, Delhi. Verma, K. C., and Verma, S. K. (2010). Alkaloids analysis in root and leaf fractions of Sarpagandha (Rauwolfia Serpentina). Agric Sci Dig, 30(2), 133-135. Wadhwa, N. and Sihag, R. C. (2012). Psychophilous mode of pollination predominates in Sarpagandha (Rauvolfia serpentina). Journal of Entomology, 9(4): 187-207. Williams, I. H. (1994). The dependence of crop production within the European Union on pollination by honeybees. Agricultural Zoology Reviews. 6: 229-257.