Download Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Bibliography B IBLIOGRAPHY Note: Most of our sessions contain original content and source material from “H ow do you say Nakba in Hebrew? ,” Zochrot’s 2011 curriculum. Session 1 Materials “ Traveling on Ruins, ” Israel Social TV, 15 December 2013. Materials in Preparation for Session 2 Haddad, Saleem, “T he Dispossessed ,” Slate Magazine, 14 May 2015. Shehadeh, Raja, S trangers in the House: Coming of Age in Occupied Palestine. P enguin Books, 2003. Session 2 Materials Khalidi, Walid. “’Ayn Ghazal,” from A ll That Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948, I nstitute for Palestine Studies, 2006. “Letter from the Israeli Commander in Chief to the Foreign Minister, proposing a response to the UN complaint on the matter of Jaba’, Ayn Ghazal and Ijzim,” 17 September 1948. Israeli State Archives. T ranslated by Elliot Leffler. “Letter of complaint from the Foreign Minister of Jordan sent to UN headquarters in Israel,” 31 July 1948. Israeli State Archives. “Letter to Israeli Minister of Foreign Affairs from the United Nations Mediator on Palestine,” 9 September 1948. Israeli State Archives. Milhemet Hakomemiut [The War of Independence] , IDF Publishers, General Staff History Branch, 1959. Morris, Benny. T he Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, Cambridge Middle East Studies, 2004. “Name of Case: Villages of Ein Ghazal, Ijzim and Jaba,” report written by the Central Truce Supervision Board and approved by the UN Mediator on Palestine, 8 September 1948. Israeli State Archives. “Testimony of Ali Hamoudi, a refugee from Ayn Ghazal,” f rom “Remembering Ayn Ghazal” in Zochrot’s study guide, “How Do You Say Nakba In Hebrew?”, translated by Elliot Leffler. Materials in Preparation for Session 3 “ Britain in Palestine: 1917­1948, ” The Balfour Project, 4 May 2015. Hasson, Nir. “ Israel's last remaining abandoned Arab village, Lifta, gets reprieve as judge voids development plans ,” Haaretz, 7 February 2012. Heywood, Mat. “G oing back to Lifta: a Palestinian exile returns ,” The Guardian, 29 May 2011. Sherwood, Harriet. “ The ruined village Palestinians will never forget, ” The Guardian, 29 May 2011. Session 3 Materials Allon, Yigal. B ook of the Palmach. Begin, Menachem. T he Revolt, 1964. “ Discriminatory Laws in Israel ,” Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, online database. Flapan, Simha. T he Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities , Pantheon, 1988. Khalidi, Walid. “Revisiting the UNGA Partition Resolution,” Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. XXVII, No. 1, Autumn 1997. “Letter to his son, Amos,” Ben Gurion, David. 5 October 1937. Obtained from the Ben­Gurion Archives in Hebrew, and translated into English by the Institute of Palestine Studies, Beirut. Morris, Benny. T he Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, Cambridge Middle East Studies, 2004. Nationality Law, 5712­1952, State of Israel. “ Palestine 1896, ” Lumiere Brothers, 1896. Plan Dalet (Plan D), 1 0 March 1948. Translated from Sefer Toldot Hahaganah [History of the Haganah], vol. 3, ed. by Yehuda Slutsky, Tel Aviv, Zionist Library, 1972. “Retroactive Transfer, A Scheme for the Solution of the Arab Question in the State of Israel,” memorandum by Yosef Weitz to Ben Gurion, 5 June 1948. The Absentees’ Property Law, 5710­1950, S tate of Israel. 2 The Land Acquisition (Validation of Acts and Compensation) Law, 5713­1953, State of Israel. The Law of Return, 5710­ 1950, S tate of Israel. Materials in Preparation for Session 4 “ Testimonies” Archive, Zochrot. Session 4 Materials “ Binyamin (Roski) Eshet, ” Towards a Common Archive, 28 October 2012. “ Women’s Testimonies of the Nakba, ” Zochrot, 9 March 2011. Materials in Preparation for Session 5 Gill, Natasha. “The Original “No”: Why the Arabs Rejected Zionism, and Why it Matters,” Middle East Policy Council, 19 June 2013. Said, Edward. “Zionism from the Standpoint of Its Victims,” from T he Edward Said Reader , Vintage, 1979. Session 5 Materials Ali, Taha Muhammad. “There Was No Farewell,” from So What: New & Selected Poems, 1971–2005 . Translated from the Arabic by Peter Cole, Yahya Hijazi, and Gabriel Levin. Darwish, Mahmoud. “I Belong There,” 1986, from U nfortunately, It Was Paradise , translated by Munir Akash and Carolyn F orché. Plan Dalet (Plan D), 1 0 March 1948. Translated from Sefer Toldot Hahaganah [History of the Haganah], vol. 3, ed. by Yehuda Slutsky, Tel Aviv, Zionist Library, 1972. The Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, S tate of Israel, 14 May 1948. “ Yerachmiel Kahanovich, Palmach soldier ,” Zochrot, 23 July 2012. Materials in Preparation for Session 6 General Progress Report and Supplementary Report, U nited Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine (UNCCP), 23 October 1950. 3 Lausanne Protocol, U NCCP, 12 May 1949. “Letter to Ben Gurion,” Harry S. Truman, 28 May 1949. Session 6 Materials Abu Amer, Adnan. “Palestinians in Jordan outraged over new work permit requirements,” Al­Monitor, 2 February 2016. Abu Moghli, Mai, and Nael Bitarie. “ The Palestinians Fleeing Syria Are Among the Most Vulnerable Refugees ,” The Nation, 4 December 2015. Closing Protection Gaps: Handbook on Protection of Palestinian Refugees, B adil Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights, 2nd Edition, February 2015. “In Figures, as of 1 Jan 2015,” United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine (UNRWA), June 2015. “Fields of Operation,” UNRWA, 2015. “ Khaled’s Digital Resistance, ” Khaled Jamal al­Jafari, 28 July 2007. “ Kholoud’s Digital Resistance, ” Kholoud al­Ajarma, 28 July 2007. “#NakbaSurvivor,” nakbasurvivor.com, digital archive. Q&A: What you need to know about Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, Badil, May 2011. Survey of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons, B adil, Vol. VIII, 2013­2015. Session 7 Materials “ Born Here ,” DAM, 22 August 2006. “ El­Funoun ,” El­Funoun Palestinian Popular Dance Troupe, 9 January 2013. “ Imagining Return to al­Ghabisiyya destroyed village ,” Baladna and Zochrot, November 2015. “ Mali Huriye (I don’t have freedom), ” DAM, 22 August 2009. “ Nation Estate ,” Larissa Sansour, 2012. 4 “ Past Tense Continuous ,” Dima Hourani, September 2015. “ Past Tense Continuous: The Live Reenactment of the Nakba, ” Cairoscene, 2 June 2015. “ The Palestine Poster Project Archives, ” The Palestine Poster Project, April 2009. “ Udna ­ al­Ghabisiyya, ” Israel Social TV, 7 January 2016. 5 .
Recommended publications
  • Briefing: Labor Zionism and the Histadrut
    Briefing: Labor Zionism and the Histadrut International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network-Labor, & Labor for Palestine (US), April 13, 2010 We are thus asking the international trade unions to Jewish working class in any country of the boycott the Histadrut to pressure it to guarantee Diaspora.‖6 rights for our workers and to pressure the The socialist movement in Russia, where most government to end the occupation and to recognize Jews lived, was implacably opposed to Zionism, the full rights of the Palestinian people. ―Palestinian which pandered to the very Tsarist officials who Unions call for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions,‖ sponsored anti-Semitic pogroms. Similarly, in the February 11, 2007.1 United States, ―[p]overty pushed [Jewish] workers We must call for the isolation of Histadrut, Israel’s into unions organized by the revolutionary minority,‖ racist trade union, which supports unconditionally and ―[a]t its prime, the Jewish labor movement the occupation of Palestine and the inhumane loathed Zionism,‖7 which conspicuously abstained treatment of the Arab workers in Israel. COSATU, from fighting for immigrant workers‘ rights. June 24-26, 2009.2 • Anti-Bolshevism. It was partly to reverse this • Overview. In their call for Boycott, Divestment Jewish working class hostility to Zionism that, on 2 and Sanctions (BDS) against Apartheid Israel, all November 1917, Britain issued the Balfour Palestinian trade union bodies have specifically Declaration, which promised a ―Jewish National targeted the Histadrut, the Zionist labor federation. Home‖ in Palestine. As discussed below, this is because the Histadrut The British government was particularly anxious has used its image as a ―progressive‖ institution to to weaken Jewish support for the Bolsheviks, who spearhead—and whitewash—racism, apartheid, vowed to take Russia, a key British ally, out of the dispossession and ethnic cleansing against the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign to Preserve Mamilla Jerusalem Cemetery
    PETITION FOR URGENT ACTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY ISRAEL Campaign to Preserve Mamilla Jerusalem Cemetery www.mamillacampaign.org Copyright 2010 by Campaign to Preserve Mamilla Jerusalem Cemetery www.mammillacampaign.org PETITION FOR URGENT ACTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY ISRAEL: DESECRATION OF THE MA’MAN ALLAH (MAMILLA) MUSLIM CEMETERY IN THE HOLY CITY OF JERUSALEM TO: 1.The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (Ms. Navi Pillay) 2. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion and Belief (Ms. Asma Jahangir) 3. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (Mr. Githu Muigai) 4. The United Nations Independent Expert in the Field of Cultural Rights (Ms. Farida Shaheed) 5. Director-General of United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (Ms. Irina Bokova) 6. The Government of Switzerland in its capacity as depository of the Fourth Geneva Conventions INDIVIDUAL PETITIONERS: Sixty individuals whose ancestors are interred in Mamilla (Ma’man Allah) Cemetery, from the Jerusalem families of: 1. Akkari 2. Ansari 3. Dajani 4. Duzdar 5. Hallak 6. Husseini 7. Imam 8. Jaouni 9. Khalidi 10. Koloti 11. Kurd 12. Nusseibeh 13. Salah 14. Sandukah 15. Zain CO- PETITIONERS: 1. Mustafa Abu-Zahra, Mutawalli of Ma’man Allah Cemetery 2. Addameer Prisoner Support and Human Rights Association 3. Al-Mezan Centre for Human Rights 4. Al-Dameer Association for Human Rights 5. Al-Haq 6. Al-Quds Human Rights Clinic 7. Arab Association for Human Rights (HRA) 8. Association for the Defense of the Rights of the Internally Displaced in Israel (ADRID) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs Between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948
    [Intelligence Service (Arab Section)] June 30, 1948 Migration of Eretz Yisrael Arabs between December 1, 1947 and June 1, 1948 Contents 1. General introduction. 2. Basic figures on Arab migration 3. National phases of evacuation and migration 4. Causes of Arab migration 5. Arab migration trajectories and absorption issues Annexes 1. Regional reviews analyzing migration issues in each area [Missing from document] 2. Charts of villages evacuated by area, noting the causes for migration and migration trajectories for every village General introduction The purpose of this overview is to attempt to evaluate the intensity of the migration and its various development phases, elucidate the different factors that impacted population movement directly and assess the main migration trajectories. Of course, given the nature of statistical figures in Eretz Yisrael in general, which are, in themselves, deficient, it would be difficult to determine with certainty absolute numbers regarding the migration movement, but it appears that the figures provided herein, even if not certain, are close to the truth. Hence, a margin of error of ten to fifteen percent needs to be taken into account. The figures on the population in the area that lies outside the State of Israel are less accurate, and the margin of error is greater. This review summarizes the situation up until June 1st, 1948 (only in one case – the evacuation of Jenin, does it include a later occurrence). Basic figures on Arab population movement in Eretz Yisrael a. At the time of the UN declaration [resolution] regarding the division of Eretz Yisrael, the following figures applied within the borders of the Hebrew state: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Suppression of the Arab Revolt in Palestine, 1936-39
    FROM LAW AND ORDER TO PACIFICATION: BRITAIN’S SUPPRESSION OF THE ARAB REVOLT IN PALESTINE, 1936–39 MATTHEW HUGHES This article examines British human rights abuses against noncom- batants during the 1936–39 Arab Revolt in Palestine, contextualizing brutality in Palestine within British military practice and law for dealing with colonial rebellions in force at the time. It shows that the norms for such operations, and the laws that codified military actions, allowed for some level of systemic, systematic brutality in the form of “collective punishments” and “reprisals” by the British army. The article also details the effects of military actions on Palestinian civilians and rebels and describes torture carried out by the British on Palestinians. Finally, it highlights a methodological problem in examining these sorts of abuses: the paucity of official records and the mismatch between official and unofficial accounts of abuse during counterinsurgency. IN APRIL 1936, the Palestinians launched a countrywide revolt against British rule in Mandatory Palestine and the official policy of support for Jewish immi- gration to the country. While interrupted by a cease-fire from October 1936 to September 1937, the rebellion reached its peak of intensity in 1938, before petering out in mid- to late 1939 with the approaching war in Europe. For long stretches of the rebellion, the British lost control of Palestine, including many major towns and, for about five days in October 1938, the Old City of Jerusalem. This was a substantial colonial revolt requiring a remarkably large force deployment by Britain: two full infantry divisions, or some twenty-five thousand men, with supporting arms by 1938.
    [Show full text]
  • • International Court of Justice • • • • •
    • • • INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE • • • • • . Request for an • Advisory Opinion on the • Legal Consequences of the • Construction of a Wall • in the Occupied Palestinian Territories • • WRITTEN STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY • THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN • • • • 30 January 2004 • • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. Introduction • Il. General background • III. Immediate background • IV. Relevant facts V. Relevant legal considerations • (a) The Court' s jurisdiction • (i) The request raises a legal question which the Court has jurisdiction ta answer • (ii) There are no compelling reasons which should lead the • Court ta refuse ta give the advisory opinion requested of it. • (b) Applicable legal principles (i) The prohibition of the use of force, and the right of seIf- • determination, are Iules of ius cogens (ii) The territory in whîch the wall has been or is planned to be • constructed constitutes occupied territory for purposes of international law • (lii) The law applicable in respect of occupied territory limîts • the occupying State's power$ (iv) Occupied territory cannot be annexed by the occupying • State • (c) Applicable legal principles and the construction of the wall (i) The occupying State does not have the right effectively to • alIDex occupied territory or otherwise to alter its status (ii) The occupying State does not have the right to alter the • population balance in the occupîed territory by estabIishing alien • settlements • ->- :.• 1 1. • -11- (iii) The occupying State lS not entitled in occupied territory to construct a wall
    [Show full text]
  • The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE The 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine AUTHORS Pappé, I JOURNAL Journal of Palestine Studies DEPOSITED IN ORE 17 July 2014 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/15208 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Author(s): Ilan Pappé Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1 (Autumn 2006), pp. 6-20 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/jps.2006.36.1.6 . Accessed: 28/03/2014 09:50 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 144.173.152.98 on Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:50:03 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE 1948 ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINE ILAN PAPP´E This article, excerpted and adapted from the early chapters of a new book, emphasizes the systematic preparations that laid the ground for the expulsion of more than 750,000 Palestinians from what became Israel in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Studeis in the History and Archaeology of Jordan Xii المملكة األردنية الهاشمية رقم اإليداع لدى دائرة المكتبة الوطنية )2004/5/1119(
    STUDEIS IN THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF JORDAN XII المملكة اﻷردنية الهاشمية رقم اﻹيداع لدى دائرة المكتبة الوطنية )2004/5/1119( 565.039 Jordan Department of Antiquities Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan Amman: The Department, 2004. Vol. VIII. Deposit No.: 1119/5/2004. Descriptors:\Jordanian History \ Antiquities \\ Studies \\ Archaeology \ \ Conferences \ * تم إعداد بيانات الفهرسة والتصنيف اﻷولية من قبل دائرة المكتبات الوطنية STUDEIS IN THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF JORDAN XII Department of Antiquities Amman- Jordan HIS MAJESTY KING ABDULLAH THE SECOND IBN AL-HUSSEIN OF THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE AL-HUSSEIN BIN ABDULLAH THE SECOND HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE EL-HASSAN BIN TALAL THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN STUDEIS IN THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF JORDAN XII Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan Published by the Department of Antiquities, P.O.Box 88, ʻAmman 11118 Jordan Editorial Board Chief Dr. Monther Jamhawi Deputy Chief Editor Jihad Haron Editing Manager Dr. Ismail Melhem Editorial Board Hanadi Al-Taher Samia Khouri Arwa Masa'deh Najeh Hamdan Osama Eid English Text Revised by Dr. Alexander Wasse STUDIES IN THE HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY OF JORDAN XII: TRANSPARENT BORDERS Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 17 Maura Sala 117 SYSTEM OF TRANSLITERATION 19 THE CERAMIC ENSEMBLE FROM TABLE OF CONFERENCES 20 THE EB IIIB PALACE B AT KHIRBAT SPEECHES 21 AL-BATRAWI (NORTH-CENTRAL JORDAN): A PRELIMINARY REPORT HRH, Prince El-Hassan Bin Talal 21 IN THE CONTEXT OF EBA PALES- Presenting 29 TINE AND TRANSJORDAN A. J. Nabulsi and P. Schönrock-Nabulsi 31 Lorenzo Nigro 135 KHIRBAT AS-SAMRA CEMETERY: A KHIRBAT AL-BATRAWI 2010-2013: QUESTION OF DATING THE CITY DEFENSES AND THE PAL- ACE OF COPPER AXES Dr Ignacio Arce, Dr Denis Feissel, Dr 35 Detlev Kreikenbom and Dr Thomas Ma- Susanne Kerner 155 ria Weber THE EXCAVATIONS AT ABU SUNAY- THE ANASTASIUS EDICT PROJECT SILAH WITH PARTICULAR CONSID- ERATION OF FOOD RELATED OR- Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Zochrot Annual Report 2019 January 2020
    Zochrot Annual Report 2019 January 2020 1 Opening As can be clearly shown in the report below, Zochrot activity and public outreach had increased significantly in 2019. During the time of the report, January 2019 – December 2019 we had carried out more than 60 different activities in public sphere including tours to destroyed Palestinian localities, lectures, symposiums, workshops, exhibition, educational courses, film festival, direct actions and more, all designed to make the Nakba present in public spaces, to resist the ongoing Nakba, and to oppose the mechanisms of denial and erasure. We continue to call upon Israelis to acknowledge their responsibility for the Nakba and to uphold justice by supporting Palestinian return. Over 2,400 people participated in our activities over the past year and took an active part in discussion about the Nakba and return. This year we also reached almost 100,000 visitors on our websites, which continues to be a leading resource to many people all over the world about the Nakba and the Return. About Zochrot Zochrot ("remembering" in Hebrew) is a grassroots NGO working since 2002 in Palestine-Israel to promote acknowledgement of and accountability for the ongoing injustices of the Nakba, the Palestinian catastrophe of 1948. Zochrot works towards the reconceptualization of the right of return as the imperative redress of the Nakba and a chance for a better life for all the country's inhabitants. Zochrot is the first and major Israeli nonprofit organization and growing movement devoted to the commemoration of the Nakba and for advocating for Palestinian return, first and foremost among the Jewish Israeli majority in Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's New Bible of Forestry and the Pursuit of Sustainable Dryland
    Israel’s New Bible of Forestry and the Pursuit of Sustainable Dryland Afforestation Alon Tal* Ben Gurion University of the Negev After several decades of dramatic reform in forestry practices, the Keren Kayemeth L’Yisrael (KKL) compiled the new orientation and specific management changes in a comprehensive policy entitled the Forestry Bible. While Israel’s foresters origi- nally planted monoculture “pioneer” pine plantations, the new orientation calls for diverse, indigenous, naturally regenerating woodlands and their rich suite of ecosystem services. Timber production has been downgraded and is not to be a priority for Israel’s dryland forests. Rather, a suite of maximization of ecosystem services with a particular emphasis on recreation and conservation drives much of the present strategy. The article highlights the evolution of Israel’s forestry policies and details the new approach to afforestation and forestry maintenance and its rationale. Key words: Forest, Israel, Keren Kayemeth L’Yisrael, pine trees, oak trees, ecosys- tem services. Restoring the vast natural woodlands destroyed during the past century con- stitutes one of the primary challenges for the world’s environmental community. The most accurate estimates place the total loss of total forest area on the planet since the advent of agriculture eight thousand years ago between forty (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005) and forty-seven percent (Billington et al., 1996). Many countries have begun ambitious afforestation efforts that are starting to slow the net annual total loss of global forestlands (Nambiar, 2005) even as regrettably, old-growth forest destruction continues apace. While international attention tends to focus on tropical and temperate reforesta- tion, dryland areas, that comprise 47% of the planet, are also areas where afforesta- tion is urgently needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005
    Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons 2004 - 2005 BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights i BADIL is a member of the Global Palestine Right of Return Coalition Preface The Survey of Palestinian Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons is published annually by BADIL Resource Center. The Survey provides an overview of one of the largest and longest-standing unresolved refugee and displaced populations in the world today. It is estimated that two out of every five of today’s refugees are Palestinian. The Survey has several objectives: (1) It aims to provide basic information about Palestinian displacement – i.e., the circumstances of displacement, the size and characteristics of the refugee and displaced population, as well as the living conditions of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons; (2) It aims to clarify the framework governing protection and assistance for this displaced population; and (3) It sets out the basic principles for crafting durable solutions for Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, consistent with international law, relevant United Nations Resolutions and best practice. In short, the Survey endeavors to address the lack of information or misinformation about Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons, and to counter political arguments that suggest that the issue of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons can be resolved outside the realm of international law and practice applicable to all other refugee and displaced populations. The Survey examines the status of Palestinian refugees and internally displaced persons on a thematic basis. Chapter One provides a short historical background to the root causes of Palestinian mass displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Peace
    Profiles of Peace Forty short biographies of Israeli and Palestinian peace builders who have struggled to end the occupation and build a just future for both Palestinians and Israelis. Haidar Abdel Shafi Palestinian with a long history of working to improve the health and social conditions of Palestinians and the creation of a Palestinian state. Among his many accomplishments, Dr. Abdel Shafi has been the director of the Red Crescent Society of Gaza, was Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza, and took part in the Madrid Peace Talks in 1991. Dr. Haidar Abdel Shafi is one of the most revered persons in Palestine, whose long life has been devoted to the health and social conditions of his people and to their aspirations for a national state. Born in Gaza in 1919, he has spent most of his life there, except for study in Lebanon and the United States. He has been the director of the Red Crescent Society in Gaza and has served as Commissioner General of the Palestinian Independent Commission for Citizens Rights. His passion for an independent state of Palestine is matched by his dedication to achieve unity among all segments of the Palestinian community. Although Gaza is overwhelmingly religiously observant, he has won and kept the respect and loyalty of the people even though he himself is secular. Though nonparti- san he has often been associated with the Palestinian left, especially with the Palestinian Peoples Party (formerly the Palestinian Communist Party). A mark of his popularity is his service as Chairman of the first Palestinian Council in Gaza (1962-64) and his place on the Executive Committee of “There is no problem of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) (1964-65).
    [Show full text]
  • The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table
    The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Dan Zafrir THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS Every academic year ICSR is offering six young leaders from Israel and Palestine the opportunity to come to London for a period of two months in order to develop their ideas on how to further mutual understanding in their region through addressing both themselves and “the other”, as well as engaging in research, debate and constructive dialogue in a neutral academic environment. The end result is a short paper that will provide a deeper understanding and a new perspective on a specific topic or event that is personal to each Fellow. Author: Dan Zafrir, 2017 Through the Looking Glass Fellow, ICSR. The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not reflect those of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation. Editor: Katie Rothman, ICSR CONTACT DETAILS Like all other ICSR publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the ICSR website at www.icsr.info. For questions, queries and additional copies of the report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom T. +44 (0)20 7848 2065 E. [email protected] For news and updates, follow ICSR on Twitter: @ICSR_Centre. © ICSR 2017 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Contents Introduction 3 Empathy Starts with the Self 4 The Opening of the Israeli Mind… 5 … And the Closing of the Palestinian One 7 Empathizing with the Past to Establish a Future (i.e.: Policy Recommendations) 8 Conclusion 9 Reference List 10 1 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table 2 The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table The Imbalance of Empathy in the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: Reflections from the (Simulated) Negotiating Table Introduction mpathy is often regarded as a key feature of social life.
    [Show full text]