Guideline on Medication and the Risk of Falling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guideline on Medication and the Risk of Falling Guideline on Medication and the Risk of Falling Purpose This guideline provides advice and information relating to medication and the risk of falls The guideline complements and may be used as an aide when completing the Trusts patients Falls Assessment Scope This guideline is applicable to all Dorset HealthCare staff that may have a responsibility for assessing a patient’s medication in relation to their risk of falling. Responsibility This guideline is not a comprehensive list of all drugs but is intended to raise awareness of the types of drugs which can cause falls. Please refer to a member of the Pharmacy team for further information and clarification if required. Related Documents DHC Patients Falls Assessment 1. Clinical objectives 1.1 All patients should have their drug burden reviewed with respect to likelihood to cause falls. 1.2 The drug history should establish the reason the drug was given, when it was started, whether it is effective and what its side effects have been. 1.3 An attempt should be made to reduce the number and dosage of medications and ensure they are appropriate and not causing undue side effects 2. Medicines and risk of falling 2.1 Falls can be caused by almost any medicine that acts on the brain or circulation 2.2 Taking a drug which acts on the brain can double the risk of a fall. 2.3 Taking 2 or more drugs that can affect the circulation or brain can double the risk of a fall. 2.4 Falls may be a result of recent medication change but are usually caused by medicines that have been given for some time. 2.5 Polypharmacy is an independent risk factor for falls. Patients on four or more medicines of any type are at greater risk of a fall Written by A. Hocking (Lead Pharmacist) Review date: February 2020 Approved by: Medicines Management Group Date: 22 February 2018 Page 1 of 6 2.6 The mechanism leading to a fall is usually one or a combination of: o Sedation; slowing of reaction time and impaired balance o Hypotension; including orthostatic hypotension, vasovagal syndrome, vasodepressor carotid sinus hypersensitivity o Cardiac changes; bradycardia, tachycardia, periods of asystole 3. Intrinsic risk factors 3.1 The risk of having a fall or recurrent falls increases with the number of associated intrinsic risk factors listed below: o Previous fall o Visual impairment o Poor mobility / gait o Alcohol > 1unit/day o Balance disorders o Orthostatic hypotension o Cognitive impairment o Hearing impairment o Polypharmacy o Psychotropic drugs use 4. Risk Stratification 4.1 Appendix A provides a classification of medicines into groups based on the likelihood of causing a fall based on evidence and pharmacological side effect profiles. 5. References Alsop K, MacMahon M. Withdrawing cardiovascular medications at a syncope clinic. Postgrad MJ 2001;77:403-5. Darowski A, Chambers SCF and Chambers DJ (2009). Antidepressants and falls. Drugs and Aging 26 (5) 381-394 Darowski A, Dwight J, Reynolds J (2011a) Medicines and Falls in Hospital. John Radcliff Hospital) Darowski A and Whiting R. (2011b) Cardiovascular drugs and falls. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 21 (2) 170-179 DCCG (2013) Caring for Care Homes – Drugs and Falls Guidance Sheet 5. N.E.W Devon Clinical Commissioning Group, South Devon and Torbay Clinical Commissioning Group. [Accessed 16-Jan-15] Leipzig RM, Cumming RG, Tinetti ME. (1999) Drugs and Falls in Older People: A systemic Review and Meta-analysis: I. Psychotropic Drugs. J AM Geriatric Soc. Jan;47(1):30-9. Van der Velde N, van den Meiracker AH, Pols HA, Stricker BH, van der Cammen TJ. (2007) Withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing drugs in older persons: effect on tilt-table test outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:734–739 Written by A. Hocking (Lead Pharmacist) Review date: February 2020 Approved by: Medicines Management Group Date: 22 February 2018 Page 2 of 6 Appendix A: Medicines and the Risk of Falling (Adapted from Darowski A, Dwight J, Reynolds J (2011) Medicines and Falls in Hospital. John Radcliff Hospital) This risk classification is based on published evidence of medicines implicated in falls. This list is not fully inclusive but highlights groups of drugs where particular care is required. Please refer to a member of the Pharmacy team if further information is required High Risk – medicines that can commonly cause falls on their own or in combination Medicine Class Examples Effects that may lead to a fall Benzodiazepines Temazepam, nitrazepam, Drowsiness, slow reaction times, diazepam. Lormetazepam. impaired balance. Particular Chlordiazepoxide, flurazepam. caution required in patients whom Lorazepam, oxazepam, have been taking for some time. clonazepam Z-drugs Zopiclone, zolpidem Drowsiness, slow reaction times, impaired balance. Tricyclic Amitriptyline, dosulepin, All have some blocking ability antidepressants imipramine, doxepin, and can cause orthostatic clomipramine, lofepramine, hypotension. All have nortriptyline, trimipramine antihistamine properties and can cause drowsiness, impaired Other Mirtazapine, trazadone, balance and slow reaction times. antidepressants mianserin Can double the rate of falling. Nortriptyline, imipramine and lofepramine are associated as being less sedative compared to others in the class. SNRI Venlafaxine, duloxetine Can cause orthostatic hypotension antidepressants through noradrenaline reuptake blockade. Monamine oxidase Phenelzine, isocarboxazid, Cause severe orthostatic A inhibitors tranylcypromine hypotension Drugs for psychosis Chlorpromazine, haloperidol All have some blocking ability and agitation fluphenazine, risperidone, and can cause orthostatic quetiapine, olanzapine hypotension. Sedation, slow reflexes, loss of balance. Opiate analgesics All opiates and related Sedate, slow reactions, impair analgesia – e.g. codeine, balance, cause delirium morphine tramadol Written by A. Hocking (Lead Pharmacist) Review date: February 2020 Approved by: Medicines Management Group Date: 22 February 2018 Page 3 of 6 High Risk continued…. Medicine Class Examples Effects that may lead to a fall Antiepileptic’s Phenytoin Phenytoin may cause permanent cerebellar damage and unsteadiness in long term therapeutic dose. Toxicity due to excessive blood levels cause ataxia and unsteadiness. Carbamazepine Sedation, slow reaction times. Toxicity due to excessive blood Phenobarbitone levels cause ataxia and unsteadiness. Parkinsons Disease Ropinirole, pramipexole, May cause delirium and orthostatic Dopamine agonists bromocriptine, cabergoline, hypotension pergolide Monoamine oxidase Selegiline Causes orthostatic hypotension - B inhibitors receptor blockers Doxazosin, tamsulosin, Cause orthostatic hypotension prazosin Centrally acting 2 Clonidine, moxonidine May cause severe orthostatic receptor agonists hypotension. Also sedating Thiazide diuretics Bendroflumethazide, Causes orthostatic hypotension, chlortalidone, metolazone weakness due to low potassium. Hyponatraemia. Angiotensin Lisinopril, Ramipril, enalapril, Decrease in peripheral resistance Converting Enzyme captopril, perindopril and drop in blood pressure. These Inhibitors drugs rely almost entirely on the kidney for their elimination and can accumulate in dehydration and renal impairment. Fosinopril, trandolapril, Excreted by kidney and liver quinapril Beta Blockers Atenolol, sotalol (renally Initial decrease in cardiac output, excreted can accumulate in decrease in peripheral vascular renal impairment) resistance. Can cause bradycardia, hypotension, Bisoprolol, metoprolol, orthostatic hypotension and propranolol, carvedilol, timolol vasovagal syndrome eye drops Common cause of syncope due to Antianginals GTN sudden loss of BP Isosorbide mononitrate, Causes hypotension and nicorandil paroxysmal hypotension Long acting oral Glimepiride, glibenclamide, Long acting sulfonylureas have Hypoglycaemics chlorpropamide increased associated risk of causing hypoglycaemia. Written by A. Hocking (Lead Pharmacist) Review date: February 2020 Approved by: Medicines Management Group Date: 22 February 2018 Page 4 of 6 Moderate risk: these medicines can cause falls especially in combination Medicine Class Examples Effects that may lead to a fall SSRI Sertraline, citalopram, Several population studies show antidepressants paroxetine, fluoxetine that SSRIs are consistently associated with an increased rate of falls and fractures, but there are no prospective trials. The mechanism of such an effect is unknown. They cause orthostatic hypotension and bradycardia rarely. They do not normally sedate but can disturb sleep. Antiepileptics Sodium valproate, gabapentin, Some data on falls association pregabalin Muscle relaxants Baclofen, dantrolene Sedative, reduce muscle tone Loop diuretics Furosemide, bumetanide Dehydration causes hypotension. Low potassium and sodium Angiotensin II Losartan, candesartan, May cause less orthostatic receptor Blockers valsartan, irbesartan, hypotension then ACE inhibitors. olmesartan, telmisartan, Excreted by kidney and liver eprosartan Calcium channel (Dihydropyridines) Vasodilatation; may cause blockers that only hypotension and paroxysmal Amlodipine, felodipine, reduce blood hypotension nifedipine, lercanidipine, pressure lacidipine, nimodipine Calcium channel (Phenylalkylamines) May cause hypotension or blockers which slow bradycardia Verapamil the heart and reduce blood (Benzothiazepines) pressure Diltiazem Other Digoxin, amiodarone, Cause symptomatic bradycardia antidysrhythmics flecainide and syncope (NB patient’s condition may predispose them to falls) Oral (Sulfonylureas) Hypoglycaemics Gliclazide,
Recommended publications
  • List of New Drugs Approved in India from 1991 to 2000
    LIST OF NEW DRUGS APPROVED IN INDIA FROM 1991 TO 2000 S. No Name of Drug Pharmacological action/ Date of Indication Approval 1 Ciprofloxacin 0.3% w/v Eye Indicated in the treatment of February-1991 Drops/Eye Ointment/Ear Drop external ocular infection of the eye. 2 Diclofenac Sodium 1gm Gel March-1991 3 i)Cefaclor Monohydrate Antibiotic- In respiratory April-1991 250mg/500mg Capsule. infections, ENT infection, UT ii)Cefaclor Monohydrate infections, Skin and skin 125mg/5ml & 250mg/5ml structure infections. Suspension. iii)Cefaclor Monohydrate 100mg/ml Drops. iv)Cefaclor 187mg/5ml Suspension (For paediatric use). 4 Sheep Pox Vaccine (For April-1991 Veterinary) 5 Omeprazole 10mg/20mg Short term treatment of April-1991 Enteric Coated Granules duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, Capsule reflux oesophagitis, management of Zollinger- Ellison syndrome. 6 i)Nefopam Hydrochloride Non narcotic analgesic- Acute April-1991 30mg Tablet. and chronic pain, including ii)Nefopam Hydrochloride post-operative pain, dental 20mg/ml Injection. pain, musculo-skeletal pain, acute traumatic pain and cancer pain. 7 Buparvaquone 5% w/v Indicated in the treatment of April-1991 Solution for Injection (For bovine theileriosis. Veterinary) 8 i)Kitotifen Fumerate 1mg Anti asthmatic drug- Indicated May-1991 Tablet in prophylactic treatment of ii)Kitotifen Fumerate Syrup bronchial asthma, symptomatic iii)Ketotifen Fumerate Nasal improvement of allergic Drops conditions including rhinitis and conjunctivitis. 9 i)Pefloxacin Mesylate Antibacterial- In the treatment May-1991 Dihydrate 400mg Film Coated of severe infection in adults Tablet caused by sensitive ii)Pefloxacin Mesylate microorganism (gram -ve Dihydrate 400mg/5ml Injection pathogens and staphylococci). iii)Pefloxacin Mesylate Dihydrate 400mg I.V Bottles of 100ml/200ml 10 Ofloxacin 100mg/50ml & Indicated in RTI, UTI, May-1991 200mg/100ml vial Infusion gynaecological infection, skin/soft lesion infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Antiischaemic and Antianginal Effects of Nicorandil and Amlodipine in Patients with Symptomatic Stable Angina Pectoris: the SWAN Study
    Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology An Independent International Scientific Journal Journal of Clinical and Basic Cardiology 1999; 2 (2), 213-217 Comparison of the antiischaemic and antianginal effects of nicorandil and amlodipine in patients with symptomatic stable angina pectoris: the SWAN study The SWAN Study Group Homepage: www.kup.at/jcbc Online Data Base Search for Authors and Keywords Indexed in Chemical Abstracts EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Krause & Pachernegg GmbH · VERLAG für MEDIZIN und WIRTSCHAFT · A-3003 Gablitz/Austria ORIGINAL PAPERS, CLINICAL The SWAN study J Clin Basic Cardiol 1999; 2: 213 Comparison of the antiischaemic and antianginal effects of nicorandil and amlodipine in patients with symptomatic stable angina pectoris: the SWAN study The SWAN Study Group1 This multicentre, double-blind, randomised study compared the antiischaemic and antianginal effects of nicorandil and amlodipine in patients with symptomatic stable angina pectoris. Nicorandil is a new coronary and balanced peripheral vasodilating agent that operates through two mechanisms of action: activation of ATP-dependent K-channels and stimulation of guanylate cyclase. A total of 121 patients with symptomatic stable angina pectoris were randomised to receive nicorandil 10 mg twice daily (bd) or amlodipine 5 mg once daily (od) for 8 weeks (optional dosage increase after 2-4 weeks to 20 mg bd and 10 mg od, respec- tively). Symptom-limited exercise tolerance tests were performed at baseline, and after 2 and 8 weeks treatment, respectively. In addition, the number of anginal attacks, nitroglycerin (NTG) usage, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and adverse events were recorded, and a subjective assessment of quality of life performed.
    [Show full text]
  • S Values in Accordance with Soczewiński-Wachtmeisters Equation
    S values in accordance with Soczewiński-Wachtmeisters equation S value from Antiparasitic drugs: Soczewiński’s Metronidazole Ornidazole Secnidazole Tinidazole Equation* S(m) 1.614 2.161 1.921 1.911 S(a) 1.634 2.159 1.887 1.923 S value from Antihypertensive drugs: Soczewiński’s Nilvadipine Felodipine Isradipine Lacidipine equation 4.129 4.597 3.741 5.349 S(m) S(a) 5.330 4.841 4.715 5.690 S value from Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Soczewiński’s Mefenamic Indomethacin Nabumetone Phenylbutazone Carprofen Ketoprofen Flurbiprofen equation acid 2.879 2.773 3.456 2.682 2.854 2.139 2.568 S(m) 3.317 3.442 3.910 2.404 3.394 1.968 2.010 S(a) *where: S(m) – S is the slope of the regression curie in accordance with Soczewiński-Wachtmeisters equation using methanol-water mobile phase S(a) – S is the slope of the regression curie in accordance with Soczewiński-Wachtmeisters equation using acetone-water mobile phase First group of drugs (antiparasitic drugs) 1. Metronidazole (2-Methyl-5-nitroimidazole-1-ethanol) 2. Ornidazole (1-(3-Chloro-2-hydroxypropyl)-2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole) 3. Secnidazole (1-(2-methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl) propan-2ol, 1-(2Hydroxypropyl)-2-methyl-5- nitroimidazole) 4. Tinidazole (1-[2-(Ethylsulfonyl)ethyl]-2-methyl-5-nitroimidazole) Second group of drugs (antihypertensive drugs) 1. Nilvadipine (2-Cyano-1,4-dihydro-6-methyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylic acid 3- methyl 5-(1-methylethyl) ester, 5-Isopropyl-3-methyl-2-cyano-1,4-dihydro-6-methyl-4-(m- nitrophenyl)-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylate, FK-235, FR-34235, Isopropyl 6-cyano-5-methoxycarbonyl-2- methyl-4-(3-nitrophenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine-3-carboxylate) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PACKAGE LEAFLET: INFORMATION for the USER Lercanidipine
    PACKAGE LEAFLET: INFORMATION FOR THE USER Lercanidipine Hydrochloride 10 mg Film-coated Tablets Lercanidipine Hydrochloride 20 mg Film-coated Tablets lercanidipine hydrochloride Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start using this medicine because it contains important information for you. - Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. - If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist. - This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. - If you get any of the side effects talk to your doctor or pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet: 1. What Lercanidipine Hydrochloride Film-coated Tablets is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Lercanidipine Hydrochloride Film-coated Tablets 3. How to take Lercanidipine Hydrochloride Film-coated Tablets 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Lercanidipine Hydrochloride Film-coated Tablets 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. WHAT LERCANIDIPINE HYDROCHLORIDE FILM-COATED TABLETS IS AND WHAT IT IS USED FOR Lercanidipine belongs to a group of medicines called calcium channel blockers (dihydropyridine derivatives) that lower blood pressure.. Lercanidipine is used to treat high blood pressure also known as hypertension in adults over the age of 18 years (it is not recommended for children under 18 years old). 2. WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE YOU TAKE LERCANIDIPINE
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics, Labelling and Package Leaflet
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS, LABELLING AND PACKAGE LEAFLET 1 SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 2 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT /.../ 10 mg film-coated tablet /.../ 20 mg film-coated tablet 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION One film-coated tablet contains 10 mg lercanidipine hydrochloride, equivalent to 9.4 mg lercanidipine. One film-coated tablet contains 20 mg lercanidipine hydrochloride, equivalent to 18.8 mg lercanidipine. Excipient with known effect: /.../ 10 mg film-coated tablet: Lactose monohydrate 30 mg Excipient with known effect: /.../ 20 mg film-coated tablet: Lactose monohydrate 60 mg For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Film--coated tablet /.../ 10 mg film-coated tablet: Yellow, round, biconvex 6.5 mm film-coated tablets, scored on one side, marked 'L' on the other side. /.../ 20 mg film-coated tablet: Pink, round, biconvex 8.5 mm film-coated tablets, scored on one side, marked 'L' on the other side. The score line is only to facilitate breaking for ease of swallowing and not to divide into equal doses. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications /.../ is indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology Route of administration: For oral use. The recommended dosage is 10 mg orally once a day at least 15 minutes before meals; the dose may be increased to 20 mg depending on the individual patient's response. Dose titration should be gradual, because it may take about 2 weeks before the maximal antihypertensive effect is apparent. Some individuals, not adequately controlled on a single antihypertensive agent, may benefit from the addition of lercandipine to therapy with a beta-adrenoreceptor blocking drug, a diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide) or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Lacidipine and Nifedipine GITS on Platelet Function in Patients with Essential Hypertension
    Journal of Human Hypertension (2000) 14, Suppl 1, S91–S95 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 0950-9240/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/jhh Effect of lacidipine and nifedipine GITS on platelet function in patients with essential hypertension MC Armas-Padilla1, MJ Armas-Herna´ndez1, R Herna´ndez-Herna´ndez1, M Velasco2, B Pacheco1, AR Carvajal1 and A Castillo-Moreno1 1Clinical Pharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, Universidad Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Barquisimeto, Venezuela; 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Vargas Medical School, Central University of Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela With the aim of evaluating the effects on blood pressure, Both drugs reduced systolic and diastolic blood press- platelet function and insulin sensitivity of the dihydro- ure at the same level, however there were observable piridines lacidipine and nifedipine GITS, a parallel dou- differences in the rate of reduction. The nifedipine GITS ble-blind study was carried out in a group of 20 patients reduced supine systolic blood pressure by 25 mm Hg in with mild to moderate essential hypertension. They the first week, while the lacidipine did so by 11 mm Hg. received a placebo for 4 weeks; then were divided at At the end of the study period nifedipine reduced supine random into two groups of 10 patients each. Nifedipine systolic blood pressure by 28 mm Hg and lacidipine by GITS, 30 mg and lacidipine, 4 mg, were given during 16 20 mm Hg. Heart rate was increased slightly but signifi- weeks of active treatment. Blood pressure and heart cantly in the nifedipine GITS group only in the standing rate were measured at the clinic in supine, sitting and position.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Medicines Advisory Group
    DORSET CARDIOLOGY WORKING GROUP GUIDELINE FOR CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS IN HYPERTENSION SUMMARY The pan-Dorset cardiology working group continues to recommend the use of amlodipine (a third generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker) as first choice calcium channel blocker on the pan-Dorset formulary for hypertension. Lercanidipine is second choice, lacidipine third choice and felodipine is fourth choice. This is due to preferable side effect profiles in terms of ankle oedema and relative costs of the preparations. Note: where angina is the primary indication or is a co-morbidity prescribers must check against the specific product characteristics (SPC) for an individual drug to confirm this is a licensed indication. N.B. Lacidipine and lercandipine are only licensed for use in hypertension. Chapter 02.06.02 CCBs section of the Formulary has undergone an evidence-based review. A comprehensive literature search was carried out on NHS Evidence, Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and UK Duets. This was for recent reviews or meta-analyses on calcium channel blockers from 2009 onwards (comparative efficacy and side effects) and randomised controlled trials (RCTs). REVIEW BACKGROUND Very little good quality evidence exists. No reviews, meta-analyses or RCTs were found covering all calcium channel blockers currently on the formulary. Another limitation was difficulty obtaining full text original papers for some of the references therefore having to use those from more obscure journals instead. Some discrepancies exist between classification of generations of dihydropyridine CCBs, depending upon the year of publication of the reference/authors’ interpretation. Dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs tend to be more potent vasodilators than non-dihydropyridine (non-DHP) CCBs (diltiazem, verapamil), but the latter have greater inotropic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT <Invented Name> 10 mg/10 mg Film-coated Tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each film-coated tablet contains 10 mg enalapril maleate and 10 mg lercanidipine hydrochloride. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Film-coated tablet <Invented Name> 10 mg/10 mg film-coated tablets are white to off white, round, biconvex film-coated tablets approximately 9 mm in diameter. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Treatment of essential hypertension in patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled by lercanidipine 10 mg alone. Fixed combination <Invented Name> 10 mg/10 mg should not be used for initial treatment of hypertension. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology Patients whose blood pressure is not adequately controlled by lercanidipine 10 mg alone could either be titrated up to lercanidipine 20 mg monotherapy or switched to fixed combination <Invented Name> 10 mg/10 mg. Individual dose titration with the components can be recommended. When clinically appropriate, direct switch from monotherapy to the fixed combination may be considered. The recommended dose is one tablet once a day. Elderly patients The dose should depend on the patient’s renal function (see ‘renal impairment’). Renal impairment <Invented Name> is contraindicated in patients with severe renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min) or in patients undergoing haemodialysis (see sections 4.3 and 4.4). Particular caution is needed when initiating treatment in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction. Hepatic impairment <Invented Name> is contraindicated in severe hepatic dysfunction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Different Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker in Hypertensive Patients Who Developed Pedal Edema on Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blocker Therapy
    Cumhuriyet Tıp Dergisi Cumhuriyet Tıp Derg 2014; 36: 19-24 Cumhuriyet Medical Journal Cumhuriyet Med J 2014; 36: 19-24 Original research-Orijinal araştırma http://dx.doi.org/10.7197/1305-0028.2102 A different dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker in hypertensive patients who developed pedal edema on dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker therapy Dihidropiridin grubu bir kalsiyum kanal blokeri tedavisi sırasında ayak bileği ödemi gelişen hipertansif hastalarda farklı bir dihidropiridin kalsiyum kanal blokerinin kullanımı Ayşe Yüksel, Ahmet Karagöz*, Özgül Uçar, Abdullah Çelik, Sinan Aydoğdu Department of Cardiology (A. Yüksel, MD), Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Education and Research Hospital, TR-06200 Ankara, Department of Cardiology (Assist Prof. A. Karagöz, MD), Giresun University, 28200, Giresun, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, (A. Çelik, MD), Giresun Professor Doctor Atilla İlhan Özdemir State Hospital, TR-28100 Giresun, Department of Cardiology (Assoc. Prof. Ö. Uçar, MD), Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, TR- 06230 Ankara, Department of Cardiology (Prof. S. Aydoğdu, MD), Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research Hospital, TR-06100 Ankara Abstract Aim. Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB) are widely preferred for the treatment of hypertension for their efficacy, metabolic neutrality and low side effect profile. However pedal edema formation limits their usage. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of pedal edema formation with a different dihydropyridine CCB in hypertensive patients who developed pedal edema during a dihydropyridine CCB therapy. Method. Fifty-eight hypertensive patients (34 female, 24 male, mean age: 65.3±10.5) in whom pedal edema developed during treatment with a dihydropyridine CCB (amlodipine 10mg/day in 40 patients, amlodipine 5mg/day in 14 patients, nifedipine GITS 30mg/day in 4 patients) were enrolled.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Man Lettering List REPORT DECEMBER 2013 1
    Tall Man Lettering List REPORT DECEMBER 2013 1 TALL MAN LETTERING LIST REPORT WWW.HQSC.GOVT.NZ Published in December 2013 by the Health Quality & Safety Commission. This document is available on the Health Quality & Safety Commission website, www.hqsc.govt.nz ISBN: 978-0-478-38555-7 (online) Citation: Health Quality & Safety Commission. 2013. Tall Man Lettering List Report. Wellington: Health Quality & Safety Commission. Crown copyright ©. This copyright work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 New Zealand licence. In essence, you are free to copy and distribute the work (including other media and formats), as long as you attribute the work to the Health Quality & Safety Commission. The work must not be adapted and other licence terms must be abided. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/nz/ Copyright enquiries If you are in doubt as to whether a proposed use is covered by this licence, please contact: National Medication Safety Programme Team Health Quality & Safety Commission PO Box 25496 Wellington 6146 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Health Quality & Safety Commission acknowledges the following for their assistance in producing the New Zealand Tall Man lettering list: • The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care for advice and support in allowing its original work to be either reproduced in whole or altered in part for New Zealand as per its copyright1 • The Medication Safety and Quality Program of Clinical Excellence Commission, New South
    [Show full text]
  • Lercanidipine Vs Lacidipine in Isolated Systolic Hypertension
    Journal of Human Hypertension (2003) 17, 799–806 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950-9240/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/jhh ORIGINAL ARTICLE Lercanidipine vs lacidipine in isolated systolic hypertension M Millar-Craig1, B Shaffu2, A Greenough3, L Mitchell3 and C McDonald3 1Department of Cardiology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, London Road, Derby, UK; 2Station Road Surgery, 152 Station Road, Wigston, Leicester, UK; 3Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, UK This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel blood pressure was À0.81 (À4.45, 2.84) mmHg. These group, multicentre study compared the efficacy and confidence intervals were within the limits specified for tolerability of lercanidipine with lacidipine. Elderly equivalence, that is, (À5, 5) mmHg. Ambulatory blood patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine pressure monitoring showed that the antihypertensive blood pressure X160/o95 mmHg) were enrolled and effects of both drugs lasted for the full 24-h dosing underwent a placebo run-in period of 14–27 days before period and followed a circadian pattern. Both treatments random allocation to lercanidipine tablets 10 mg once were well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse drug daily (n ¼ 111) or lacidipine tablets 2 mg once daily reactions and a low withdrawal rate. Significantly fewer (n ¼ 111) for the assessment period (112–160 days). patients withdrew from treatment with lercanidipine Titration to lercanidipine 20 mg once daily (two 10 mg (P ¼ 0.015). Neither treatment had any clinically signifi- tablets) or lacidipine 4 mg once daily (two 2 mg tablets) cant effect on pulse rate or cardiac conduction.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Vital Essential and Necessary Drugs and Medical Sundries For
    LIST OF VITAL ESSENTIAL AND NECESSARY DRUGS AND 2015 MEDICAL SUNDRIES FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTIONS Sixth Edition STANDARDS & REGULATION DIVISION JAMAICA List of Vital Essential and Necessary List of Drugs and Medical Sundries for Public Institutions List of Vital Essential and Necessary List of Drugs and Medical Sundries for Public Institutions CONTENTS CONTENTS Contd. Page Preface 5-6 Page Information on Hospitals and Health Centres 7 Explanatory Notes 8 Medical Sundries 69-73 Prescription Writing 9-10 Dental Supplies 74 Algorithm for Treatment of Hypertension 11-12 Radiotherapy – Diagnostic Agents 75 Algorithm for Management of Type 2 Diabetes 13-14 Raw Materials 76 List of Drugs Designated for NHF 15-17 List of Drugs Designated for JADEP 18 VOLUME11 – SPECIALIST LIST 77 VOLUME 1 – GENERAL LIST 19 CLASSIFICATION OF DRUGS SECTION 1. Cardiovascular System 78 CLASSIFICATION OF DRUGS SECTION 2. Central Nervous System 79 SECTION 1. Cardiovascular System 20-24 SECTION 3. Dermatology 80 SECTION 2. Central Nervous System 25-30 SECTION 4. Endocrine System 80 SECTION 3. Dermatology 31-33 SECTION 5. Gastro-intestinal System 81 SECTION 4. Ear, Nose and Oropharynx 34-35 SECTION 6. Infections 81 SECTION 5. Endocrine System 36-38 SECTION 7. Malignant Disease and SECTION 6. Gastro-intestinal System 39-40 Immunosuppression 82 SECTION 7. Infections 41-46 SECTION 8. Musculoskeletal and Joint Diseases 83 SECTION 8. Malignant Disease and SECTION 9. Ophthalmology 83 Immunosuppression 47-49 SECTION 10. Genito-Urinary Tract Disorders 84 SECTION 9. Musculoskeletal and Joint Diseases 50-51 SECTION 11. Respiratory System 84 SECTION 10. Nutrition and Blood 52-54 SECTION 12.
    [Show full text]