DOCSLIB.ORG

SEC News Digest, 06-21-2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEC News Digest, 06-21-2000 , SEC NEWS DIGEST Issue 2000-118 June 21, 2000 COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS OPEN MEETING - TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2000 - 10:00 A.M. The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 27, at 10 00 a.m will be: The Commission will consider whether to propose rule amendments to its auditor independence requirements The proposals are intended to modernize the Commission's regulations regarding: (1) investments by auditors or their family members in audit clients; (2) employment relationships between auditors or their family members and audit clients; and (3) the scope of services provided by audit firms to their audit clients. In addition, the rules would require companies to disclose in their annual proxy statements certain information about non-audit services provided by their auditors during the last fiscal year. For further information, please contact John Morrissey or W. Scott Bayless at (202) 942- 4400. CLOSED MEETING - WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2000 - 11:00 A.M. The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 28, at 11 00 a.m will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature. At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact. The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942- 7070. ENFORCEMENT l'ROCEEDINGS FOUR INDIVIDUALS SANCTIONED FOR INVESTMENT ADVISER FRAUD On June 20, the Commission entered a settled administrative order (Order) imposing sanctions against James L Foster, his wife, Laurie F. Foster, Steven M. Bolla, and William E. Busacker, Jr. Pursuant to the Order, James Foster was barred from association with any investment adviser; Bolla was barred from association with any investment adviser, with the right to reapply for association after five years; Laurie Foster was barred from association with any investment adviser or broker-dealer with a right to reapply for association after three years; and Busacker was suspended for a period of twelve months from association with any investment adviser and any broker- dealer The Order finds that on June 19 a final judgment was entered against the Fosters, Bolla, and Busacker in Securities and Exchange Commission v. James L. Foster, et al., Civil Action No. 1:OOCVOI192, D.D.C. As a result of that final judgment, the Fosters, Bolla, and Busacker were permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly violating: Sections 204 and 206 (1), (2), and (4) of the Advisers Act and Rules 204- 2(aX3), (c)(l) and (c)(2), and 206(4)-2(a)(I) through (5) thereunder; Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), and Section 1O(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition, James Foster, Laurie Foster, and Bolla were permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly violating Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-I(a)(5) thereunder. Each of the Respondents consented to entry of the final judgment without admitting or denying any violations of the federal securities laws, or any of the allegations set forth in the Commission's oompIaint, except as to the subject matter and III personam jurisdiction. The Commission's complaint alleges that, between early 1995 and October 1996, the defendants defrauded their investment advisory clients by failing to disclose their switch from a conservative investment approach to a high-risk strategy involving short-selling of high-technology stocks The defendants also failed to disclose that, contrary to express representations, Laurie Foster and Busacker were paid commissions on trades. The complaint also alleges that the Fosters arbitrarily assigned values to client accounts, that the defendants mailed false account statements to clients that contained baseless account values, and that certain clients were unfairly favored over others in distributions. In addition, the Fosters and Bolla prepared and distributed a brochure entitled "Investing in the Nineties At a Glance" which misrepresented that they were engaged in a conservative investment strategy, and included false historical performance data. The complaint also alleges that the defendants sold unregistered securities to their clients in the form of the advisers' in-house managed investment funds. 2 NEWS DIGEST, June 21,2000 For further information, see Litigation Release Numbers 15297 and 15436 and Sec v. James L. Foster, et al., Civil Action No 00Civ.01192, D.D.C., LR-16567. (Rels IA- 1881; 34-42963, File No. 3-10236) THREE MORE TRADERS SETTLE LOTUS INSIDER TRADING CHARGES The Commission today announced that three more traders have agreed to settle Commission charges that they engaged in insider trading in advance of IBM's takeover of Lotus Development Corporation Specifically, Isaac Lederman has agreed to pay (i) disgorgement of $143,286 (representing his trading profit of $47,463 and the trading profits of two individuals he tipped) plus $66,384 in prejudgment interest, jointly and severally with his tippees, and (ii) a civil penalty of $143,286. Samuel G Lederman, one of I. Lederman's tippees, has agreed to disgorge his trading profit of $47,463 plus $22,760 in prejudgment interest and to pay a civil penalty of $47,463. Jonah Rosenblatt has agreed to a final judgement holding him liable for disgorgement of $467,990 (representing the profits from trading he allegedly caused) plus prejudgment interest, but payment of disgorgement was waived and a penalty was not imposed, based upon Rosenblatt's inability to pay. I. Lederman, S. Lederman and Rosenblatt have further consented to the entry of permanent injunctions prohibiting future violations of Section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14e-3 thereunder Moreover, S. Lederman and Rosenblatt, both stockbrokers, have agreed to be barred from the securities industry, with rights to reapply after five and three years, respectively In consenting to the entry of relief, the defendants neither admitted nor denied the Commission's substantive allegations against them. The Commission filed this matter on May 26, 1999, charging a total of twenty-five individuals with insider trading in Lotus call options and common stock on the basis of inside information misappropriated from IBM by one of its secretaries Eleven of the twenty-five defendants in this case have now reached settlements with the Commission The Commission is continuing to litigate against the remaining defendants [SEC v Lorraine K. Cassano, Civil Action No. 99-CV-3822, SDNY] (LR-16599) SEC ORDERS WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. TO CEASE AND DESIST FROM VIOLATING THE ANTIFRAUD, BOOKS AND RECORDS, AND INTERNAL CONTROLS PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT The Commission today brought and settled administrative fraud charges against Waste Management, Inc (WMI) for making materially false and misleading forecasts of its second quarter 1999 earnings. WMI was also charged for violation of the books and records and internal controls provisions of the securities laws. Without admitting or denying the charges, WMI consented to the issuance of an order that it cease and desist from committing or causing such violations in the future WMI, based in Houston, Texas, is engaged in the collection, transportation, and disposal of solid waste for residential, commercial, and industrial customers 3 NEWS DIGEST, June 21,2000 The Commission's Order states that on June 9, 1999, WMI publicly forecasted that it would mm between $ 78 to $.81 per share for its second quarter which was to end June 30, 1999. The June 9 forecast was a reiteration of projections that WMI had made earlier in the year. The Commission found that by at least June 9 WMI was aware of significant adverse trends in its business that made its continued public support of the projections unreasonable. On July 6, 1999, WMI announced that it anticipated a revenue shortfall for the second quarter of approximately $250 million versus its internal budget, and that it expected earnings to be in the range of $.67 to $.70 per share. On July 7, 1999 the company's share price went from $53.56 to $33.94 per share. On August 3, 1999~ WMI announced that its actual earnings for the second quarter were only $.58 per share. By August 4, the company's share price had retreated to $22.25 per share. According to the Order, as the second quarter of 1999 progressed, WMI began to suffer severe setbacks In addition, the Order finds that WMI attempted to convert to a new accounting, billing and management information system and that the new system had been unable to generate accurate and timely financial information. The Commission found that by June 9,1999, the date that WMI reiterated its favorable earnings forecast, WMI had the following adverse information at its disposal: I. By the end of May, internal estimates from senior field managers showed earnings shortfalls in WMI's North 'American solid waste business; II. In early June, WMI had rolled back certain price increases that it bad implemented at the end of the first quarter 1999; III. Delays and other difficulties in the conversion of the accounting and billing systems had led to an increase in accounts receivable balances; IV. Tbe volume of solid waste entering WMI's domestic and Canadian landfills had decreased. The Commission's Order further finds that under the circumstances, WMI knew or was reckless in not knowing that the projections provided to the market on June 9, 1999 for its second quarter lacked a reasonable basis. The Commission Order points out that WMI had an inadequate billing, accounting and management information system. According to the Order, WMI's management information system failures rendered the June 9 earnings forecast even more unreasonable because it should have been clear that WMI simply could not generate information from which responsible forecasts could be made.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Argument of Counsel -- the Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 15 Number 1 Article 6 10-1-1960 Argument of Counsel -- The Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering J. R. Stewart Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation J. R. Stewart, Argument of Counsel -- The Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering, 15 U. Miami L. Rev. 85 (1960) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol15/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT ARGUMENT OF COUNSEL-THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING I. INTRODUCTION It long has been recognized that damages for pain and suffering are not susceptible to exact monetary evaluation.' Because there is no market value2 for such items as pain, suffering, humiliation, ridicule, embarrassment, inability to lead a normal life, and mental anguish, they are difficult to translate into dollars and cents, and a monetary award becomes an arbitrary allowance and not a process of measurement. Consequently, the judge, in his instructions, is unable to give the jury a firm standard upon which to base their decision,3 but can only charge that in determining a proper award they resort to their own knowledge of these matters and to their enlightened conscience. 4 The purpose of this comment is to examine the approaches an attorney may utilize properly in arguing the amount of these damages to the jury.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley Cecil Anderson
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research Spring 1937 Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley Cecil Anderson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Anderson, Cecil, "Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley" (1937). Honors Theses. Paper 335. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3082 01028 4908 DEVELOPMENT CHARLESTON AND THE GREAT KAN.AVJHA VALLEY by Cecil Anclerson History Thesis May 24. i9!9. i ~ t ; : ~ ~ •, ' UN l V El C11 ·; . ~ · • , ; : ., .. : . : 1 i FOREWARD Tha developmen:t. of the Valley of the Great Kanawha~. River has heen rapid ana has not as yet reached its peake in growth. The Valley has been richly endowed ·with abundance of raw mate­ rial and the facilities for the changing or these materials in­ ~~ useful commodities. Along with the growth of the industry comes civic' growth and it is these growth that I wish to pre­ sent in this monograph • .Althllugh much data l!lave accumulated in the form of reports, bulletins, and articles, no available work from which a· true oo.n­ cept of the past growth and present status may be obta·ined now exists in assembled form. Much of the material I ha;ve gathered have been through visits to vari,us plants and organization and in personal interviews I have gathered what ever I could th!lt is avail a bla for a stu:dy of this kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Record No. 3186
    Record No. 3186 In the Supren1e Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond VIRGINIA ST AGE LINES, INC., V. COMMONWEALTH OF, VIRGINIA, ETC. FROM 1'F1 I~ S'J'ATE COR.P OR,\ TlON COMMISSION OF VIBOlNIA, RULE 14. ~5. N Ul\lBER OF COPms ·1·0 n~ P rum AND D ELIVF.Rl•:O TO Orros­ I~G Cou~sm.. Twenty <.:opiC>s of earb brief shall be filed with the cl('rk of the eourt, and nt least two copies mailed or de­ livered to opposing counsC'l 011 or before the clay on wltid1 the brief is fi led. ~.G. S1 zr-: A~'i) 'fYPF. Bric>fs 8-hall lie nine inehes in length ::md six inches in width, so as to <·onforrn in dimensions to t he printc•d re('ord, a nd ~lrnll he pl'intt1 d in type not less in size, ns to height a nd wid U1, than the• type in wltieli the reeonl is printc•tl. The record umubc>r of the. case and 1rnmes. of coun­ sel shall he pr inted OH 1hL' front <:'O\'C' t' of all brief~. :i\I. B. \\TNl'TS, Clerk. Court opens at S :30 a. m. ; Adjourns at 1 :00 p. m. 11, VA-JObfo RULE 14-BRIEFS 1. Form and contents of a ppellant's brief. T h e ope n ing brief o f t he appellan t ( or the petit ion for appeal wl!c u adopted as the opening brief) shall con tain : (a) A s u bjec t inc.lex and tal1lc oi c ita t ions w ith cas es alphabetically arranged.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Motor Bus Operators
    _ .......~·LIATED WITH N AUTOMOBILE .--....:• '- OCIATION X413 73sn C3 ashinqton, 'D. e. 045573 • BUS FACTS FOR .. 'l9'Y3~- A Publication of Facts and Figures of the Motor Bus Industry as of January 1, t 93,;\ Compiled and Published by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MOTOR BUS OPERATORS TOWER BUU.DJNG, WASHINGTON, D. C. Table of Contents GENERAL STATISTICS Page Growth of Motor Bus Transportation (1928-1932, incl.)--------------- 4-5 Annual Census Totals (1928-1933) by States and Regions 6-7 Census (1933) Revenue Earning Bus Operations ----------- 8-9 Census (1933) of School Bus Operations-------------- 10 Business Done by Revenue Bus Operations During 1932 12 ELECTRIC RAILWAY BUS OPERATIONS Growth and Extent of____ ·------------4-5--8-13-19 Capacity of Buses Purchased By 14 New Buses Purchased By__ 15 Seating Capacity of Buses in Use By 16 Distribution of Equipment, lllileage, Passengers and Revenue 18 STEAM RAILROAD BUS OPERATIONS Growth and Extent of _____________4-5--8-19 FOREIGN STATISTICS Use of Buses in Foreign Countries<--------- 11 TRENDS IN BUS PRODUCTION Trends in Body Capacities 81 Trends in Chassis Production 32 Trends in Body Production ---------------- 33 MISCELLANEOUS Passenger Miles in U. S. by Various Methods of Transportation__ 20 Railroad Freight Traffic Compared with Industrial Production___ 20 Life Insurance Company Investments as of Dec. 31, 1932 22 Assets of Fiduciary Institutions in Railroad Securities 23 TAXES Percent of Increase in Taxes, 1919-1931 21 Comparison of Bus Taxes and Other Taxes. 24 Growth of Bus Tax Rate
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary of State Division of Business Services Foreign Charters 1874-1971 Record Group
    SECRETARY OF STATE DIVISION OF BUSINESS SERVICES FOREIGN CHARTERS 1874-1971 RECORD GROUP 281 Processed by: Ted Guillaum Archives Technical Services Tennessee State Library & Archives Date Completed: 5-24-2001 MICROFILM ONLY INTRODUCTION Record Group 281, Secretary of State, Division of Business Services, Foreign Charters, 1874-1971, contains 180 cubic feet of documents filed by corporations from out of state doing business in Tennessee. These forms were filed with the Secretary of State and are arranged numerically, however, there is also an alphabetical index. Under Tennessee statute it is the ministerial duty for The Secretary of State to file corporate documents and to maintain a record of the filings. Every foreign (non- Tennessee) corporation that intends to conduct business in Tennessee must first register their corporation with the Secretary of State. To register the foreign corporation in Tennessee, the corporation would file a copy of its charter. A charter is the legal document that establishes the corporation as a legal entity. The registration includes a principal address for the corporation and a registered agent address for service of process. This record group was microfilmed and the originals disposed of according to the Tennessee State RDA for these records. SCOPE AND CONTENT Record Group 281, Secretary of State, Division of Business Services, Foreign Charters, contains 180 cubic feet of documents spanning the years 1874 through 1971. The record group consists of reports filed by corporations headquarted outside of Tennessee. The Division of Business Services originally maintained these records in numerical order but the numerical index evidently was abandoned at some point.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Carriers
    COMNIvOMIVLALHGoG 01; ROBERTS.TUCKER PO BOX 19 DIRECTOR RICHMOND, VIRGIN1! TEL: (804) 371-9172 [email protected] FAX (804) 371-9797 STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICE TAXATION DIVISION L\tLV SEPTEMBER 2013 13 ING GEORGE COUNTY ANWi Dear Sir or Madam: We are hereby providing you with the 2013 Certified Statements of Assessed Value for the electric, gas, telecommunications, and water companies for your locality. Also enclosed is a listing of the Motor Vehicle Carrier companies that were subject to the annual Rolling Stock Tax administered by this office on their vehicles for the 2013 Tax Year. The portion of the collected tax attributable to your jurisdiction was made to your local treasurer on August 1, 2013. We hope that you will find this useful in preparing your tax bills for the public service companies. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Robert S. Tucker Director RST/dkd TYLER BUILDING, 1300EAST MAIN STREET, RICHMOND, VA 23219-3630 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE FOR THE DEAF-TDD/VOICE: (804) 371-9206 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGI IL STATE CORPORATION COMMISSI(, MOTOR VEHICLE CARRIERS A STATEMENT Showing for each Motor Vehicle Carrier the value of its Rolling Stock as of the first day of January 2013, a year 2013 extended thereon pursuant to Title 58.1, Chapter 26, Article 5, of the Code of Virgin MOTOR VEHICLE CARRIER VALUEOF -AXAT Lou ROLLING STOCK ON EACH $100 1 . Abbott Bus Lines, Inc. 8000 2,551,018.41 25.510.18 John D. Abbott, Secretary/Treasurer 1704 Granby St. Roanoke VA 24012 2.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN T. HENDRICK, Plff. in Err., V. STATE of MARYLAND
    Hendrick v. State of Maryland, 235 U.S. 610 (1915) 35 S.Ct. 140, 59 L.Ed. 385 Requirements of Laws Md.1910, c. 207, for registering automobiles at a cost varying KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment according to the horse power, and for the driver Declined to Extend by County of Fond du Lac v. Derksen, Wis.App., May to obtain a license, and that nonresidents, to 29, 2002 have a limited use of the highways without cost, 35 S.Ct. 140 must have complied with a similar law in their Supreme Court of the United States. respective states and have secured a tag, are not unreasonable as to vehicles moving in interstate JOHN T. HENDRICK, Plff. in Err., commerce. v. STATE OF MARYLAND. 233 Cases that cite this headnote No. 77. [3] Commerce Motor Vehicles and Carriers | 83 Commerce Argued November 11 and 12, 1914. 83II Application to Particular Subjects and | Methods of Regulation Decided January 5, 1915. 83II(E) Licenses and Taxes 83k63 Licenses and Privilege Taxes Synopsis 83k63.15 Motor Vehicles and Carriers IN ERROR to the Circuit Court of Prince George's County, Rights of citizens to pass through the several State of Maryland, to review a conviction for violating the states held not unconstitutionally interfered with state motor vehicle law. Affirmed. by Laws Md.1910, c. 207, § 140a, relating to use of highways of the state by nonresident owners The facts are stated in the opinion. of automobiles. 69 Cases that cite this headnote West Headnotes (5) [4] Constitutional Law Discrimination in General [1] Commerce Nonexercise of Power by 92 Constitutional
    [Show full text]
  • Dayton, Lebanon &
    TRUCKING TRANSMISSION 2414 Transmission Towers. Transportation-Freight, Rail and Water. Barrett Line Inc (The) 1121 Cham of Com AMERICAN BRIDGE CO., Cincinnati, pomeroy & Ch.arleston Packet Co Inc wharfboat ft of Mam H. M. Knapp, Contracting Manager, 1301 Federal Barge Lines 1413 Union Central Life and 1302 Union Trust Bldg., Phone MAin Bldg 3946 Fleischmann Transportation Co (The) 419 P,lum Fruit Growers Express Co rm 31. 27 W Front Transmission-Variable Speed. Greene Line steamers. Inc wharfboat ft of Main Hatfield-Campbell Creek Coal Co. ('1'he)" 810 LEWELT~EN l\IANUFACTURING co. OF CO­ LUMBUS, IND., Chas. Upson, District Union Trust Bldg Sales Manager, 1012 Traction Bldg, Phone Island Creek Fuel .& Transportation Co 923,Dix Ter Bldg CHerry 6834 Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co sec Front and Harriet - Transparencies. Ohio RIYer Co 705 A tIas Bk Bldg AMERICAN TRANSPARENCY co. (THE), Ohio River Transit Co ft of Sycamore Manufacturers of Transparent Si,gns., 3736 Ohio River Transportation, Co it of MRin Regent Av., Norwood. Phones MElrose 5682 Raymond City Transportation C<!. (The) 1506 and 5683 1st Nat Bk Bldg Transportation Lines. Transportation-Freight-Automobile. Atlantic Greyhound Lines sec 7th and Wa1nut Acme Fast Freight Inc rm 814, 528 Walnut Buckeye Stages Inc 304 Lock and sec 7th and Acme Transfer & Storage Co Inc rm 814', 528 Walnut Walnut Capitol Greyhound Lines Inc sec 7th and Wal- Adams Motor Express 2702 Spring Grove Av nut , Affiliated Freight Terminals Inc 16 W 2d Central Greyhound Lines 441 Morgan and s e 0 Ajax Motor Service Inc 1010 Ges't " . 7th and Walnut .'" -, " ' Allied Van Lines Inc of Chicago III rm 516, Columbia Pacific Nite Coach UIi~' '431 WaIn,ut 26 E 6th Consolidated Coach' Corp of Lexington Ky' sec American Truck Terminals Co 506 Augusta , 7th and Walnut " Atlas Freight Inc rm 814, 528 Walnut Bates Motor Transport Lines Inc 49 Central A v Besl Transfer Co .Inc (The) .n w c Cooper and' Apple .
    [Show full text]
  • Munitions Blasts Kill 5? in France
    Dr Ur. do, FU., head of the national Dog Hit-and-Run jrganisation, said: "We are entering Rites Tomorrow Watches Probe I :he Ml HAYES RITES Death Costs $50 BODY OF greatest period of prosperity the RUSSELL real estate ever MUNITIONS BLASTS has industry experi- and License Loss enced in this country. It U not a period of wild specuUtion or boom. Put is the beginning of a period of Br tlie Associated Press KILL 5? IN FRANCE MAY BE EXHUMED steady, healthy growth of our busi- NEW YORK. November 17.— ness. I omit — intentionally the word Convicted of driving away after I boom' because I believe it Is odious 200 When Two Ex- Masonic Services to Be Held hia car had killed a dog, Solomon Inquest Order on to all of us. The progress we make Injured Hoffman was sentenced to pay a Depends Delegation, Largest in New in future years will be in the interest Wreck Large for Meteorologist at fine of $50 or serve 10 days 'In Report of Examination of the entire country.” plosions jail and his driving license was Orleans—Waverly Taylor General Sessions Schedule. revoked in Bronx Powder Mill. Lee’s Chapel. Magistrates’ of Pistol. Presides at General sessions will be held start- Court yesterday. Meeting. ing tomorrow and will continue Associated Press. Funeral services Hoffman said he struck the B* the Associate* Frets. By the for Montrose W. BY JAMES Y. NEWTON. through Saturday. At the same time and had tried SAINT CHAMAS. France. Novem- Hayes, 62, principal meteorologist of dog unavoidably LOS ANGELES.
    [Show full text]
  • Record No, 5618
    f- Record No, 5618 In the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Rickiiioiid ATLANTIC GREYHOUND LINES OF VIRGINIA, INC., ET AL. V. SILVER FOX LINES, ET AL. FKOM THE STATE COETOTlATION COMMISSIOK OP VIRGINIA BULE 5:12—BRIEFS §5. Number of Copies. Twenty-five copies of each brief shall be filed with the clerk of this Court and three copies shall be mailed or delivered by counsel to each other counsel as defined in Rule 1:13 on or before the day on which the brief is filed. §6. Size and Ttpb. Briefs shall be nine inches in length and six inches in width, so as to conform in dimensions to the printed record, and shall be printed in type not less in size, as to height and width, than the type in which the record is printed. The record number of the case and the names and addresses of counsel submitling the brief shall be printed on the front cover. HOWARD G. TURNER, Clerk. Court opens at 9:30 a. m.; Adjourns at 1:00 p. m. , ,I ' '7-···~-~~·- ;.----~----~ --- ...1 ..... .. ) ,iN~Ml~E_J~~~~~\VJNIE~: - . Mhi~ .cJ$~, :P1:9t@~J;~ ~~ill~ ·~ -~~~~ '·~~_Jilt~ '£~S$iOo'. ~~f;,{~gy.tt: .tq· . ;&@' 1J!l!_fjjt 1· ·~P-R. '19.&! .. .. .·· . - · ··~qu. ~-0· \~~) \i!'l.'lis.~:· ·:[email protected] ;ftl()r'-· ~a~J(~~~~ ~~· t~ 1tf\@··J*t~ . l!itnt rm-..s ~: ~1J~! ~ 'ftarit =:t:~~,. d!!rll' I --- . - J Record No ... 5618 • ·~· .. ' ·~., :, I • ' ... ; ..: . V1RGINIA:. In the St~preme C()u;t. of A.p~¢~i~_\J.teld.·._:a.t ·the •. S~pl~eme Court of ApP.eals Buildi1ig in t:Q~:.Qt~y;..~f.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    Guide to the Warshaw Collection of Business Americana Subject Categories: Transportation NMAH.AC.0060.S01.01.Transportation Vanessa Broussard-Simmons and Nicole Blechynden Funding for partial processing of the collection was supported by a grant from the Smithsonian Institution's Collections Care and Preservation Fund (CCPF). 1999, Revised 2017 Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 4 Subseries : Business Records, Marketing Material, Trade Literature, and Other, circa 1835-1963........................................................................................................ 4 Subseries : Genre, 1904-1934............................................................................... 11 Warshaw Collection of Business Americana Subject Categories: Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate Commerce -- State License and Privilege Tax on Motor Vehicles
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 5 Number 1 Article 24 12-1-1950 Taxation -- Interstate Commerce -- State License and Privilege Tax on Motor Vehicles Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Taxation -- Interstate Commerce -- State License and Privilege Tax on Motor Vehicles, 5 U. Miami L. Rev. 169 (1950) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol5/iss1/24 This Case Noted is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CASES NOTED states that he cannot be required to serve against his will, it would seem to permit him to refuse to serve at any time he might be called upon, for ex- ample if he were ill or away, without losing the right to serve when needed again. If he refused because his other duties were under the federal ap- pointment, rather than the state, he should not lose his rights to retain this special status. Thus, the court can be justified in allowing the retired judge to temporarily withdraw his certificate of willingness to serve, and retain the right to later resume retirement status and pay. The suggestion raised by the dissenting opinion,'0 that a retired state officer may be violating the constitutional prohibition" against dual-office holding, can be answered by the definition of an "officer".
    [Show full text]