DOCSLIB.ORG

L-41-136 Opinion No. 1941 RR 12 March 15, 1941

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L-41-136 Opinion No. 1941 RR 12 March 15, 1941 L-41-136 Opinion No. 1941 R.R. 12 March 15, 1941 President Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. Dear Sir: The question of the "employer" status of Pennsylvania Grey­ hound Lines, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Penn Greyhound, under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance and Retirement Acts has been raised. Both statutes have defined in identical terms an "employer" to include "any company which is directly or indirectly owned or con­ trolled by one or more such carriers ^/express company, sleeping-car company, or carrier by railroad, subject to part I of the Interstate Commerce Act^ or under common control therewith, and which operates any equipment or facility or performs any service .... in connec­ tion with the transportation of passengers or property by railroad, or the receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit, refriger­ ation or icing, storage, or handling of property transported by rail­ road . ." Ownership of the common stock of the Penn Greyhound is held equally by the Greyhound Corporation, and the American Contract and Trust Company which is wholly owned by the Pennsylvania Railroad, here­ inafter referred to as the Railroad, a carrier by railroad subject to part I of the Interstate Commerce Act. As the Railroad completely owns and controls the American Contract and Trust Company, the Railroad's participation in Penn Greyhound will be considered directly rather than indirectly through the American Contract and Trust Company. Since the Greyhound Corporation is not an express company, sleeping-car company, or carrier by railroad subject to part I of the Interstate Commerce Act and since it is neither directly or indirectly owned or controlled by any such company, or under common control therewith, the Greyhound Corporation is not an "employer" within the Railroad Retirement and Un­ employment Insurance Acts. \J In view of this fact, Penn Greyhound's status depends firstly upon whether or not it is "controlled by" the Railroad. \J The stock of the Greyhound Corporation is widely held and there is no indication of its control by any railroad or railroads. A dis­ cussion of Greyhound Corporation is found infra, pp. 2-3. Control is an issue of fact which must be determined after an examination of the pertinent indicia in the surrounding facts and circumstances. Thus Section 202.04 of the Regulations to the Railroad Retirement Act of 1937, 4 Fed. Reg. 1478, April 7, 1938, defines con­ trol as follows: "A company or person is controlled by one or more carriers, whenever there exists in one or more such carriers the right or power by any means, method or circumstances, irrespective of stock ownership, to direct, either directly or indirectly, the policies and business of such a company or person and in any case in which a carrier is in fact exercising direction of the policies and business of such a company or person." To determine whether the Railroad possesses this right or power over Penn Greyhound evidence relative to the latter's organi­ zation, growth, operations, etc. must be examined. Although the Rail­ road had entered the bus field shortly before 1930, it believed that a tie-up with a group experienced in bus operations would be advisable and joined on March 28, 1930 with the Greyhound Corporation in forming the Penn Greyhound. 2/ The Greyhound Corporation (known before 1930 as the Motor Transit Corporation) had been incorporated in 1926 and had acquired interests in bus companies operating in the territory adjacent to Chicago. During the ensuing years its activities became nation-wide. The system developed along three lines: (l) autonomous regional operations; (2) uniform national policies and centralized control of common functions and standards; and (3) coordination with other forms of transportation. Greyhound Corporation enforces national policies with respect to all matters which affect more than one company. Actual operations are carried on in a particular region under a single regional corporation. The officers usually have been identical and all policies and management have been and are decided and administered by the Greyhound Corporation. Since 1928 it adopted a policy of inviting railroads to participate with it in the ownership of bus lines, with a view to developing coordinated passenger trans­ portation. Its position in this respect was pointed out in the annual stockholder report for the year 1935: "Among the advantages of such a relationship are savings from joint use of facilities, substitution of bus service for unprofitable train service, and the movement of passengers to railroads from points not served by rail. Independence of Zj Penn Greyhound operates in Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, and the District of Columbia - terri­ tory also served by the Railroad. management is maintained as between the two modes of trans­ portation, and each is operated in its ovm interest, coop­ erating where there is mutual advantage to be gained." Six railroads now own interests in as many Greyhound companies. Zj The Railroad transferred to Penn Greyhound certain bus property, rights and franchises in payment for half the common stock. It also advanced $800,000 for the total issue of Penn Greyhound's 7 per cent preferred stock which acquires voting privilege upon the non-payment of dividends for two successive years. However, this contingency has not occurred, nor does it seem likely in the light of past earning statements. 4/ The Railroad and Greyhound Corporation have four represen­ tatives respectivelvonthe Board of Directors. Those representing the Railroad are | J, Vice-President-Operation o^Ra^^oa^; J, Yice-President-Comptrollor of Railroad;! 1 Vice-President - Finance of Railroad, Vice-President - Traffic Railroad. Other officials of Penn Greyhound are also Rail­ road men. Thus Treasurer of Railroad, is also the Treasurer of Penn Greyhound. Secretary of Railroad, is also Secretary of the Penn Greyhound, V ice-President of the Railroad, is Vice-President of Penn Greyhound; and Chief of Corporate Work of Railway, holds the same position with Penn Greyhound. Removal of a director requires a vote of three-fourths of the directors and the majority of directors must consent before action can be taken in ordinary matters. The Executive Committee to which the Board of Directors has delegated much of its power is four in number, two Railroad and two Greyhound Corporation members. Thus, the Railroad would seem to have at least a negative control in both the Executive Committee and the Board of Directors. However, the actual management and control of the Penn Grey­ hound are in the hands of the Greyhound Management Company, hereinafter referred to as the Management Company, which is completely owned by the Greyhound Corporation. The Management Company's power is derived from a contract made with Penn Greyhound and the pertinent parts of which are herein set out: 3/ However, Greyhound Corporation is not owned by any railroad or group of railroads and evidently no railroad is today among its thirty largest stockholders. 4/ Profit for 11 months ended November 30, 1935 $1,844,175.95 Profit for year 1937 1,033,396.66 Profit for year 1938 1,306,660.25 Profit for year 1939 1,818,624.37 "First, The Owning Company ^Penn Greyhoundy7 hereby employs the Management Company to act as its managing agent .... subject, however, at all times to the general supervision and direction of the Boards of Directors of the Owning Company and the Operating Com­ panies 5/. The Management Company agrees to co-ordinate its management of such lines with that of any other motor bus line or system of lines managed by it . "Second: .... the Management Company shall furnish such additional equipment, personnel, facilities, supplies, and appurte­ nances as may from time to time be reasonably required for such effi­ cient and economical management, subject, however, to the prior approval by the Owning Company .... "Seventh. The Management Company shall keep such accounts and records as shall be satisfactory to the Comptroller of the Owning Company and to the Comptrollers of American Contract and Trust Company and Greyhound Corporation, joint owners of the Owning Company, which accounts and records shall be open to the inspection of said Comp­ trollers, or their duly authorized representatives, at all reasonable times .... * * * * V * "Eleventh. This agreement .... shall continue in full force and effect for a term of fifteen (15) years and thereafter from year to year or of any year thereafter upon six (6) months' written notice from either party to the other; Provided, also that this agree­ ment shall terminate notwithstanding the above .... at any time upon six (6) months' written notice by the Owning Company to the Management Company, if, in the judgment of the Board of Directors of the Owning Company, the Management Company is not conducting the serv­ ice covered by this contract in a reasonably efficient and economical manner." ****** Under the terms of this contract control of the Penn Greyhound is delegated to the Management Company, the alter ego of the Greyhound Corporation, for fifteen years and continues in effect thereafter from year to year unless six months' notice is given by either Penn Grey­ hound or the Management Company. Since Penn Greyhound's Board of Directors require a majority vote to act, the Greyhound Corporation could always block any Railroad attempt to give the notice of termi­ nation. Although disputes arising
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Trucking Associations V. Scheiner: Truckers Challenge Pennsylvania's Highway User Fees Under the Dormant Commerce Clause
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 41 Number 5 Article 10 5-1-1987 American Trucking Associations v. Scheiner: Truckers Challenge Pennsylvania's Highway User Fees Under the Dormant Commerce Clause Robert J. Borrello Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert J. Borrello, American Trucking Associations v. Scheiner: Truckers Challenge Pennsylvania's Highway User Fees Under the Dormant Commerce Clause, 41 U. Miami L. Rev. 1117 (1987) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol41/iss5/10 This Casenote is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CASENOTES American Trucking Associations v. Scheiner: Truckers Challenge Pennsylvania's Highway User Fees Under the Dormant Commerce Clause I. INTRODUCTION .. ....................................................... 1117 II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................... 1119 III. THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE ...................................... 1121 A. The Axle Tax Discriminatesin Effect ................................ 1122 B. The Complementary Tax Doctrine ................................... 1124 1. JUSTIFICATION FOR THE COMPLEMENTARY TAX: ONE-SIDED TAX BURDEN .
    [Show full text]
  • 1949 Journal
    : I OCTOBEK TEEM, 1949 STATISTICS Miscel- Original Appellate Total laneous Number of cases on dockets 13 867 568 1, 448 Cases disposed of__ — 0 757 551 1, 308 Remaining on dockets 13 110 17 140 Cases disposed of—Appellate Docket By written opinions 108 By per curiam opinions 93 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation (merit cases) 1 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 555 Cases disposed—Miscellaneous Docket: By written opinions 0 By per curiam opinions - 1 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 436 By denial or withdrawal of other applications 107 By transfer to Appellate Docket 7 Number of written opinions 87 Number of petitions for certiorari granted 92 Number of admissions to bar 849 REFERENCE INDEX Page Murphy, J., death of (July 19, 1949) announced 1 Rutledge, J., death of (Sept. 10, 1949) announced 1 Clark, J., announcement of appointment 1 Minton, J., announcement of appointment 1 Hughes, C. J., resolutions of the bar presented 198 J. Howard McGrath, Attorney General, presented 1 Maynard E. Pirsig, dean of Law School of University of Min- nesota, appointed a member of the Civil Rules Advisory Committee 188 Allotment of Justices 34 Attorney—change of name 37, 79, 171, 189 850087—50 77 II Rules of Supreme Court : page Rule 27, par. 9, amended (amicus curiae briefs) 70 Rule 32, par. 7, amended (flat fee system adopted) . Court also ordered abandoned the practice of awarding attor- ney's docket fee and concurrently authorized a change in practice whereby but one docket fee would be charged and one docket number assigned where a petition for certiorari seeks review of two or more judgments in consolidated cases 192, 193 Rule 13, par.
    [Show full text]
  • Argument of Counsel -- the Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 15 Number 1 Article 6 10-1-1960 Argument of Counsel -- The Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering J. R. Stewart Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation J. R. Stewart, Argument of Counsel -- The Measure of Damages for Pain and Suffering, 15 U. Miami L. Rev. 85 (1960) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol15/iss1/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMENT ARGUMENT OF COUNSEL-THE MEASURE OF DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING I. INTRODUCTION It long has been recognized that damages for pain and suffering are not susceptible to exact monetary evaluation.' Because there is no market value2 for such items as pain, suffering, humiliation, ridicule, embarrassment, inability to lead a normal life, and mental anguish, they are difficult to translate into dollars and cents, and a monetary award becomes an arbitrary allowance and not a process of measurement. Consequently, the judge, in his instructions, is unable to give the jury a firm standard upon which to base their decision,3 but can only charge that in determining a proper award they resort to their own knowledge of these matters and to their enlightened conscience. 4 The purpose of this comment is to examine the approaches an attorney may utilize properly in arguing the amount of these damages to the jury.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioners' Brief in American Trucking Associations Et Al. V. Michigan Public Service Commission, Et Al., 03-1230
    No. 03-1230 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., AND USF HOLLAND, INC., Petitioners, v. MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the Michigan Court of Appeals __________ BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONERS ROBERT DIGGES, JR. CHARLES ROTHFELD ATA Litigation Center Counsel of Record 2200 Mill Road EVAN TAGER Alexandria, VA 22314 Mayer, Brown, Rowe & (703) 838-1865 Maw LLP 1909 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 263-3000 QUESTION PRESENTED As reformulated by the Court, the question presented is: “Whether the $100 fee [imposed by Michigan in Mich. Comp. Laws § 478.2(1)] upon vehicles conducting intrastate operations violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.” (I) ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING AND RULE 29.6 STATEMENT The parties to the proceeding in the Michigan Court of Appeals were Westlake Transportation, Inc., Vanverkooi Carriers, Inc., El Toro Motor Freight, Inc., Myriah, Inc., Prism, Inc., Gerrigs Trucking & Leasing, Inc., Best Way Ex- press, Inc., Troy Cab., Inc., Deeco Services, Inc. d/b/a Deeco Transportation, Tiberio Frank d/b/a Fairfield Towing, Elex, Inc. d/b/a/ Lafond Express, Dale Constine & Sons, Inc., Cal- cut Sales & Services, Inc. d/b/a Calcut Trucking Company, Ambassador Transportation, Inc., Hawkins Steel Cartage, Inc., Midcon Freight Systems, Inc., JLH Transfer, Inc., H & H Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a S & M Cartage, Inc., Central Trans- port, Inc., Bancroft Trucking Company, US Truck Company, Inc., West End Cartage, Inc., Central Cartage Company, CTX, Inc., Mohawk Motor Michigan, Inc., Economy Trans- port, Inc., McKinlay Transport Limited, Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc., Universal Amcan Limited, Romeo Expediters, Inc., Tom Thumb Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority Dist. V. Delta Airlines, Inc., 405 U.S
    Florida State University Law Review Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 6 1973 Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority Dist. v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 405 U.S. 707 (1972) Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority Dist. v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 405 U.S. 707 (1972), 1 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 354 (1973) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol1/iss2/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FloridaState University Law Review [VOL 1 signals the judicial recognition in Florida of a valuable scientific de- vice which will aid in identifying the guilty while protecting the innocent.32 Constitutional Law - STATE TAXATION-AIRPORT USE TAXES IMPOSED ON DEPARTING COMMERCIAL AIRLINE PASSENGERS ONLY AS COMPEN- SATION FOR USE OF FACILITIES VIOLATE No FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS.-Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority Dist. v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 405 U.S. 707 (1972). The rapid increase in private and commercial aviation operations' has necessitated concomitant airport development and expansion. One method of generating funds for these purposes is the so-called air- port use tax. Prior to 1972, only Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey and an Indiana airport authority district had actually imposed such taxes. 2 With slight variations, the tax in each instance took the printed. In such a situation the voiceprint could be excluded as the "fruit" of a con- stitutionally impermissible seizure.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley Cecil Anderson
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research Spring 1937 Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley Cecil Anderson Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Anderson, Cecil, "Development of Charleston and the Great Kanawha Valley" (1937). Honors Theses. Paper 335. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3082 01028 4908 DEVELOPMENT CHARLESTON AND THE GREAT KAN.AVJHA VALLEY by Cecil Anclerson History Thesis May 24. i9!9. i ~ t ; : ~ ~ •, ' UN l V El C11 ·; . ~ · • , ; : ., .. : . : 1 i FOREWARD Tha developmen:t. of the Valley of the Great Kanawha~. River has heen rapid ana has not as yet reached its peake in growth. The Valley has been richly endowed ·with abundance of raw mate­ rial and the facilities for the changing or these materials in­ ~~ useful commodities. Along with the growth of the industry comes civic' growth and it is these growth that I wish to pre­ sent in this monograph • .Althllugh much data l!lave accumulated in the form of reports, bulletins, and articles, no available work from which a· true oo.n­ cept of the past growth and present status may be obta·ined now exists in assembled form. Much of the material I ha;ve gathered have been through visits to vari,us plants and organization and in personal interviews I have gathered what ever I could th!lt is avail a bla for a stu:dy of this kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Record No. 3186
    Record No. 3186 In the Supren1e Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond VIRGINIA ST AGE LINES, INC., V. COMMONWEALTH OF, VIRGINIA, ETC. FROM 1'F1 I~ S'J'ATE COR.P OR,\ TlON COMMISSION OF VIBOlNIA, RULE 14. ~5. N Ul\lBER OF COPms ·1·0 n~ P rum AND D ELIVF.Rl•:O TO Orros­ I~G Cou~sm.. Twenty <.:opiC>s of earb brief shall be filed with the cl('rk of the eourt, and nt least two copies mailed or de­ livered to opposing counsC'l 011 or before the clay on wltid1 the brief is fi led. ~.G. S1 zr-: A~'i) 'fYPF. Bric>fs 8-hall lie nine inehes in length ::md six inches in width, so as to <·onforrn in dimensions to t he printc•d re('ord, a nd ~lrnll he pl'intt1 d in type not less in size, ns to height a nd wid U1, than the• type in wltieli the reeonl is printc•tl. The record umubc>r of the. case and 1rnmes. of coun­ sel shall he pr inted OH 1hL' front <:'O\'C' t' of all brief~. :i\I. B. \\TNl'TS, Clerk. Court opens at S :30 a. m. ; Adjourns at 1 :00 p. m. 11, VA-JObfo RULE 14-BRIEFS 1. Form and contents of a ppellant's brief. T h e ope n ing brief o f t he appellan t ( or the petit ion for appeal wl!c u adopted as the opening brief) shall con tain : (a) A s u bjec t inc.lex and tal1lc oi c ita t ions w ith cas es alphabetically arranged.
    [Show full text]
  • National Association of Motor Bus Operators
    _ .......~·LIATED WITH N AUTOMOBILE .--....:• '- OCIATION X413 73sn C3 ashinqton, 'D. e. 045573 • BUS FACTS FOR .. 'l9'Y3~- A Publication of Facts and Figures of the Motor Bus Industry as of January 1, t 93,;\ Compiled and Published by the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MOTOR BUS OPERATORS TOWER BUU.DJNG, WASHINGTON, D. C. Table of Contents GENERAL STATISTICS Page Growth of Motor Bus Transportation (1928-1932, incl.)--------------- 4-5 Annual Census Totals (1928-1933) by States and Regions 6-7 Census (1933) Revenue Earning Bus Operations ----------- 8-9 Census (1933) of School Bus Operations-------------- 10 Business Done by Revenue Bus Operations During 1932 12 ELECTRIC RAILWAY BUS OPERATIONS Growth and Extent of____ ·------------4-5--8-13-19 Capacity of Buses Purchased By 14 New Buses Purchased By__ 15 Seating Capacity of Buses in Use By 16 Distribution of Equipment, lllileage, Passengers and Revenue 18 STEAM RAILROAD BUS OPERATIONS Growth and Extent of _____________4-5--8-19 FOREIGN STATISTICS Use of Buses in Foreign Countries<--------- 11 TRENDS IN BUS PRODUCTION Trends in Body Capacities 81 Trends in Chassis Production 32 Trends in Body Production ---------------- 33 MISCELLANEOUS Passenger Miles in U. S. by Various Methods of Transportation__ 20 Railroad Freight Traffic Compared with Industrial Production___ 20 Life Insurance Company Investments as of Dec. 31, 1932 22 Assets of Fiduciary Institutions in Railroad Securities 23 TAXES Percent of Increase in Taxes, 1919-1931 21 Comparison of Bus Taxes and Other Taxes. 24 Growth of Bus Tax Rate
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary of State Division of Business Services Foreign Charters 1874-1971 Record Group
    SECRETARY OF STATE DIVISION OF BUSINESS SERVICES FOREIGN CHARTERS 1874-1971 RECORD GROUP 281 Processed by: Ted Guillaum Archives Technical Services Tennessee State Library & Archives Date Completed: 5-24-2001 MICROFILM ONLY INTRODUCTION Record Group 281, Secretary of State, Division of Business Services, Foreign Charters, 1874-1971, contains 180 cubic feet of documents filed by corporations from out of state doing business in Tennessee. These forms were filed with the Secretary of State and are arranged numerically, however, there is also an alphabetical index. Under Tennessee statute it is the ministerial duty for The Secretary of State to file corporate documents and to maintain a record of the filings. Every foreign (non- Tennessee) corporation that intends to conduct business in Tennessee must first register their corporation with the Secretary of State. To register the foreign corporation in Tennessee, the corporation would file a copy of its charter. A charter is the legal document that establishes the corporation as a legal entity. The registration includes a principal address for the corporation and a registered agent address for service of process. This record group was microfilmed and the originals disposed of according to the Tennessee State RDA for these records. SCOPE AND CONTENT Record Group 281, Secretary of State, Division of Business Services, Foreign Charters, contains 180 cubic feet of documents spanning the years 1874 through 1971. The record group consists of reports filed by corporations headquarted outside of Tennessee. The Division of Business Services originally maintained these records in numerical order but the numerical index evidently was abandoned at some point.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Vehicle Carriers
    COMNIvOMIVLALHGoG 01; ROBERTS.TUCKER PO BOX 19 DIRECTOR RICHMOND, VIRGIN1! TEL: (804) 371-9172 [email protected] FAX (804) 371-9797 STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SERVICE TAXATION DIVISION L\tLV SEPTEMBER 2013 13 ING GEORGE COUNTY ANWi Dear Sir or Madam: We are hereby providing you with the 2013 Certified Statements of Assessed Value for the electric, gas, telecommunications, and water companies for your locality. Also enclosed is a listing of the Motor Vehicle Carrier companies that were subject to the annual Rolling Stock Tax administered by this office on their vehicles for the 2013 Tax Year. The portion of the collected tax attributable to your jurisdiction was made to your local treasurer on August 1, 2013. We hope that you will find this useful in preparing your tax bills for the public service companies. Should you have any questions, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Robert S. Tucker Director RST/dkd TYLER BUILDING, 1300EAST MAIN STREET, RICHMOND, VA 23219-3630 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE FOR THE DEAF-TDD/VOICE: (804) 371-9206 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGI IL STATE CORPORATION COMMISSI(, MOTOR VEHICLE CARRIERS A STATEMENT Showing for each Motor Vehicle Carrier the value of its Rolling Stock as of the first day of January 2013, a year 2013 extended thereon pursuant to Title 58.1, Chapter 26, Article 5, of the Code of Virgin MOTOR VEHICLE CARRIER VALUEOF -AXAT Lou ROLLING STOCK ON EACH $100 1 . Abbott Bus Lines, Inc. 8000 2,551,018.41 25.510.18 John D. Abbott, Secretary/Treasurer 1704 Granby St. Roanoke VA 24012 2.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN T. HENDRICK, Plff. in Err., V. STATE of MARYLAND
    Hendrick v. State of Maryland, 235 U.S. 610 (1915) 35 S.Ct. 140, 59 L.Ed. 385 Requirements of Laws Md.1910, c. 207, for registering automobiles at a cost varying KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment according to the horse power, and for the driver Declined to Extend by County of Fond du Lac v. Derksen, Wis.App., May to obtain a license, and that nonresidents, to 29, 2002 have a limited use of the highways without cost, 35 S.Ct. 140 must have complied with a similar law in their Supreme Court of the United States. respective states and have secured a tag, are not unreasonable as to vehicles moving in interstate JOHN T. HENDRICK, Plff. in Err., commerce. v. STATE OF MARYLAND. 233 Cases that cite this headnote No. 77. [3] Commerce Motor Vehicles and Carriers | 83 Commerce Argued November 11 and 12, 1914. 83II Application to Particular Subjects and | Methods of Regulation Decided January 5, 1915. 83II(E) Licenses and Taxes 83k63 Licenses and Privilege Taxes Synopsis 83k63.15 Motor Vehicles and Carriers IN ERROR to the Circuit Court of Prince George's County, Rights of citizens to pass through the several State of Maryland, to review a conviction for violating the states held not unconstitutionally interfered with state motor vehicle law. Affirmed. by Laws Md.1910, c. 207, § 140a, relating to use of highways of the state by nonresident owners The facts are stated in the opinion. of automobiles. 69 Cases that cite this headnote West Headnotes (5) [4] Constitutional Law Discrimination in General [1] Commerce Nonexercise of Power by 92 Constitutional
    [Show full text]
  • Dayton, Lebanon &
    TRUCKING TRANSMISSION 2414 Transmission Towers. Transportation-Freight, Rail and Water. Barrett Line Inc (The) 1121 Cham of Com AMERICAN BRIDGE CO., Cincinnati, pomeroy & Ch.arleston Packet Co Inc wharfboat ft of Mam H. M. Knapp, Contracting Manager, 1301 Federal Barge Lines 1413 Union Central Life and 1302 Union Trust Bldg., Phone MAin Bldg 3946 Fleischmann Transportation Co (The) 419 P,lum Fruit Growers Express Co rm 31. 27 W Front Transmission-Variable Speed. Greene Line steamers. Inc wharfboat ft of Main Hatfield-Campbell Creek Coal Co. ('1'he)" 810 LEWELT~EN l\IANUFACTURING co. OF CO­ LUMBUS, IND., Chas. Upson, District Union Trust Bldg Sales Manager, 1012 Traction Bldg, Phone Island Creek Fuel .& Transportation Co 923,Dix Ter Bldg CHerry 6834 Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co sec Front and Harriet - Transparencies. Ohio RIYer Co 705 A tIas Bk Bldg AMERICAN TRANSPARENCY co. (THE), Ohio River Transit Co ft of Sycamore Manufacturers of Transparent Si,gns., 3736 Ohio River Transportation, Co it of MRin Regent Av., Norwood. Phones MElrose 5682 Raymond City Transportation C<!. (The) 1506 and 5683 1st Nat Bk Bldg Transportation Lines. Transportation-Freight-Automobile. Atlantic Greyhound Lines sec 7th and Wa1nut Acme Fast Freight Inc rm 814, 528 Walnut Buckeye Stages Inc 304 Lock and sec 7th and Acme Transfer & Storage Co Inc rm 814', 528 Walnut Walnut Capitol Greyhound Lines Inc sec 7th and Wal- Adams Motor Express 2702 Spring Grove Av nut , Affiliated Freight Terminals Inc 16 W 2d Central Greyhound Lines 441 Morgan and s e 0 Ajax Motor Service Inc 1010 Ges't " . 7th and Walnut .'" -, " ' Allied Van Lines Inc of Chicago III rm 516, Columbia Pacific Nite Coach UIi~' '431 WaIn,ut 26 E 6th Consolidated Coach' Corp of Lexington Ky' sec American Truck Terminals Co 506 Augusta , 7th and Walnut " Atlas Freight Inc rm 814, 528 Walnut Bates Motor Transport Lines Inc 49 Central A v Besl Transfer Co .Inc (The) .n w c Cooper and' Apple .
    [Show full text]