Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY The origin of Canadian political parties can There had been considerable agitation for be traced to the early days of the English reform throughout the sparsely settled and French colonies of Upper and Lower regions of Upper Canada. In Lower Canada, Canada. The American Revolution had seen similar outcries for reform had led to the the influx into Canada of a substantial election of an Assembly dominated by number of United Empire Loyalists. Settling Reformers led by Papineau. There was a largely in what is now Ontario (Upper steady correspondence among the Canada) and in parts of Atlantic Canada, the Reformers in the various regions. Mackenzie majority of the Loyalists believed in the need and Papineau and their followers in Upper for a governing class. This class was and Lower Canada were consciously working comprised of the chief families as well as for the same ends in close alliance. business and professional elite in the colonies and formed a closely-knit group The Reformers were opposed to the special around the British Governor. Like their privileges of the ruling oligarchies in Upper counterparts in England, those who followed and Lower Canada known respectively as this belief became known as Tories. the “Family Compact” and the “Château Clique”. The “Château Clique” was an elite The ancestors of the modern Liberal Party who governed with disregard for and usually contended that freeborn Englishmen did not in opposition to the wishes of the majority. In lose any of their rights by crossing the Upper Canada, its equivalent, the “Family Atlantic. They believed that the real objective Compact” was equally tyrannical. The of government in the colonies should be the Reformers realized, however, that the only welfare and advantage of the settlers effective way to redress grievances and themselves. destroy special privileges was, as William Lyon Mackenzie put it in 1835, to establish Following the War of 1812 there was “the British constitutional system, by which increased demand for self-government in the head of the government is obliged to what was to become Canada. The American choose his councilors and principal officers Revolution had established a definitive from men possessing the confidence of the precedent for revolt that the colonists chose popular branch of the legislature”. The to reject in favour of a more gradual process Reformers saw responsible government as of change. the means to root out special privilege and give equal rights to all. The Reformers Those who opposed the ruling class theory – Frustration with the seeming impossibility of The Reformers (Liberals) – were much less reform led the reformers to resort to arms in organized than the Tories who were already the Rebellion of 1837. Although the rebellion in power. In Lower Canada, the Reformers was small, and quickly failed, it demonstrated were led by Louis-Joseph Papineau, and in the reformers determination and the fact that Upper Canada by William Lyon Mackenzie. the need for reform was great. 3 Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY After the Act of Union the union of Ontario and Quebec, but was to In 1838, the British, dispatched Lord Durham be a basic policy of the Liberal Party down as governor with authority to restore order, through the years. to inquire into the causes of the rebellion, and to suggest measures for the future. The Responsible government implies well- result of his mission was the presentation of organized parties because its efficient the Durham Report, which is considered to functioning depends upon a party being able be one of the greatest constitutional to maintain a stable majority in a documents in British colonial history. His two representative assembly. The Lafontaine- major recommendations were the union of Baldwin coalition did not quite become a Upper and Lower Canada and the immediate party in their day, and it disbanded quickly grant of responsible government. when they retired in 1851. Nevertheless, it is one of the great achievements in Canadian In 1841, the Act of Union combined Upper political history. It was the beginning of and Lower Canada and established a single organized party government. The Lafontaine- legislative unit to be called Canada. The Act Baldwin coalition was also the first example provided for a governor, a legislative council, of what has become the most striking and appointed for life by the Crown (this was distinctive feature of Canadian politics – the changed in 1856, by making the members biracial party which overcomes differences submit to election for an eight-year term), between French and English and brings them and an elected legislative assembly of 84 together inside one party to conduct a members, each of the two former colonies government on principles on which they can being given 42 members. agree. The issue of responsible government, The Grits however, was not settled until the general In the years following the adoption of election of January 1848. Robert Baldwin responsible government (1848), there and Louis-Hippolyte Lafontaine, the leaders occurred a gradual restructuring of the of the Canadian Reformers realized that political parties. In 1854, a Liberal- responsible government would not become a Conservative coalition was formed in order reality unless they secured the support of a to ensure a majority. This coalition gradually majority of the members of the legislature in solidified into a party under the skillful both of the former colonies. In 1848, seven leadership of John A. Macdonald and years after Upper and Lower Canada were Georges-Etienne Cartier. formed into a legislative union, the voters went to the polls and elected a majority of In opposition to the Liberal-Conservative Reformers. Lafontaine and Baldwin were government of the 1850s, there emerged two entrusted with the task of forming the first groups: The Grits of Upper Canada, headed cabinet. This dual French and English by George Brown, the powerful editor of The speaking leadership was symbolic not only of Globe, and the Rouges of Lower Canada. 4 Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY They combined briefly but never quite many reforms. Some of the more notable coalesced into a real party before 1867. were the replacement of open voting by Taking in allies from the Maritime provinces secret ballot, the confinement of elections to after Confederation, they were to become a single day, the creation of the Supreme the Reform or Liberal Party of Mackenzie, Court of Canada, and the establishment of Blake and Laurier. Hansard, the public record of the House of Commons Debates. Despite these reforms, Confederation was brought about, as far as the Liberal Party under Mackenzie was the province of Canada was concerned, by a unable to achieve a solid popular base of coalition of the Macdonald-Cartier support in any province except Ontario, and Conservatives with Brown’s Grits. The in 1878, the government was badly defeated Rouges group refused to join the movement. in the general election. The Conservatives Before July 1, 1867, Brown had led most of won 137 seats, the Liberals 69. his followers out of the coalition. Macdonald formed the first federal government by Edward Blake constructing a cabinet out of his own In 1880, Edward Blake, a great Conservative allies whom he had found in parliamentarian but a man whose leadership the Maritimes and a few Upper Canada Grits. was not extremely successful, succeeded There were a few years of party confusion; Alexander Mackenzie as leader of the Liberal but gradually a pattern of party alignments Party. On the retirement of Blake, the Liberal emerged and by the time of the second members of Parliament elected Wilfrid election in 1872, a straight party fight took Laurier national leader of the Liberals. The place between a Conservative government choice of Laurier to succeed Blake was a and a Reform or Liberal Opposition. clear demonstration that the Liberal Party accepted the equal partnership of the The Liberals – Alexander Mackenzie English and French in Canada. From the The Conservatives dominated the political time of his election as leader, Laurier began scene from the time of Confederation until to preach the ideal of national unity. Until his 1896, with the exception of the years 1873 to death in 1919, Laurier spent a total of almost 1878. 45 years in the House of Commons, 15 of them as Prime Minister of Canada. In November 1873, Macdonald was forced to resign because of the Pacific Scandal and an The Laurier Years election was called for the following year. In Wilfrid Laurier has been called the architect the election of 1874, the Liberals won 133 of modern Liberalism. In Quebec City, in seats, the Conservatives 73. For the next 1877 – 10 years before he became leader – four years, Canada had a Liberal he defined Liberalism: government under Prime Minister Alexander “The principle of Liberalism resides in the Mackenzie. essence of our nature itself, in this thirst for During these years, the Liberals carried out happiness we bring with us in life, which 5 Liberal Party of Canada - HISTORY follows us everywhere, but which however, is the disintegration of Macdonald’s regime. never completely quenched this side of The old French-English bitterness flared up Heaven. We gravitate incessantly towards an again. After Laurier’s Liberals defeated the ideal that we never reach. No sooner have Conservatives in 1896 (the Liberals won 117 we reached the point we are aiming at, that seats and the Conservatives won 89), they we discover new horizons whose existence drew into their party many of the Bleus, the we never even suspected. We dash towards moderate Conservatives of Quebec. In this them, and those new horizons, explored in way, they received substantial support in their turn; we discover others to which we Quebec, making the Liberal Party the party are carried away, on and on, further always.
Recommended publications
  • Ellsworth American IS DEALWITH SUPERS Nnd Democratic Ods
    | loswwimo* ruoi, *3.M ram tub. ( Vol. LIV. I ir rare i» abtabcb. tiM. | WEDNESDAY ELLSWORTH, MAINE, AFTERNOON. SEPTEMBER 9. 1908 AT mi Tuiwom «wrowrp?. No 37. £t&rrti*rmmt*. LOCAL AFFAIRS. 1 distributed, not only by the many callen F03 REPFESKHTATiVK. LAKEWOOD. •* rooms, bat also by the eommitteM J Winnie Garland has NSW of the surrounding towns. Sketch of 31an Ellsworth Pro- employment at tlM ADVEKI HKMKMT4 THIS WKKK. fhc ba teller;. of Mr. and Mrs. Petes poses to Sfend to the Legislature. The May, daughter Abie Garland and have been tak- Edward U Dammera Co—Optician*. John A. the nomine* (ami!; D W Carney-Sheriff sale. Fortier, died at her home on Grant streel Peters, republican ing an outing ot a (ew days up the lake. for for to the from Spencer Higgins place sale. last Wednesday eleven representative legislature Fred with wife and at RU sale. night, aged yean, Rollins, child, Haines-Opening Funeral services were was born in Burrill Nat’l Bank. held Friday after- Ellsworth, Ellsworth in 1864 Bangor, spent a few days last week at bis noon. The parents have the sympathy oj He graduated from the schools and childhood home. Egypt, Me: all their public ip bereavement. Schools with M C Austin—Lumber and wood for sale. fitted at the high school for college, and begin Tuesday the same James E. teachers as last Garland Mary C Frets Austin—Trespass notice. Parsons, cashier of the Bnrrill entered Bowdoin college in 1881, graduat- spring—Martin ia national will leave next week foi No. 1 and Miss Minerva Jordan in No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Culture of Canada
    CHAPTER 2 The Political Culture of Canada LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this chapter you should be able to • Define the terms political culture, ideology, and cleavages. • Describe the main principles of each of the major ideologies in Canada. • Describe the ideological orientation of the main political parties in Canada. • Describe the major cleavages in Canadian politics. Introduction Canadian politics, like politics in other societies, is a public conflict over different conceptions of the good life. Canadians agree on some important matters (e.g., Canadians are overwhelmingly committed to the rule of law, democracy, equality, individual rights, and respect for minorities) and disagree on others. That Canadians share certain values represents a substantial consensus about how the political system should work. While Canadians generally agree on the rules of the game, they dis- agree—sometimes very strongly—on what laws and policies the government should adopt. Should governments spend more or less? Should taxes be lower or higher? Should governments build more prisons or more hospitals? Should we build more pipelines or fight climate change? Fortunately for students of politics, different conceptions of the good life are not random. The different views on what laws and policies are appropriate to realize the ideologies Specific bundles of good life coalesce into a few distinct groupings of ideas known as ideologies. These ideas about politics and the good ideologies have names that are familiar to you, such as liberalism, conservatism, and life, such as liberalism, conserva- (democratic) socialism, which are the principal ideologies in Canadian politics. More tism, and socialism. Ideologies radical ideologies, such as Marxism, communism, and fascism, are at best only mar- help people explain political ginally present in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Needs You Volume One
    Canada Needs You Volume One A Study Guide Based on the Works of Mike Ford Written By Oise/Ut Intern Mandy Lau Content Canada Needs You The CD and the Guide …2 Mike Ford: A Biography…2 Connections to the Ontario Ministry of Education Curriculum…3 Related Works…4 General Lesson Ideas and Resources…5 Theme One: Canada’s Fur Trade Songs: Lyrics and Description Track 2: Thanadelthur…6 Track 3: Les Voyageurs…7 Key Terms, People and Places…10 Specific Ministry Expectations…12 Activities…12 Resources…13 Theme Two: The 1837 Rebellion Songs: Lyrics and Description Track 5: La Patriote…14 Track 6: Turn Them Ooot…15 Key Terms, People and Places…18 Specific Ministry Expectations…21 Activities…21 Resources…22 Theme Three: Canadian Confederation Songs: Lyrics and Description Track 7: Sir John A (You’re OK)…23 Track 8: D’Arcy McGee…25 Key Terms, People and Places…28 Specific Ministry Expectations…30 Activities…30 Resources…31 Theme Four: Building the Wild, Wild West Songs: Lyrics and Description Track 9: Louis & Gabriel…32 Track 10: Canada Needs You…35 Track 11: Woman Works Twice As Hard…36 Key Terms, People and Places…39 Specific Ministry Expectations…42 Activities…42 Resources…43 1 Canada Needs You The CD and The Guide This study guide was written to accompany the CD “Canada Needs You – Volume 1” by Mike Ford. The guide is written for both teachers and students alike, containing excerpts of information and activity ideas aimed at the grade 7 and 8 level of Canadian history. The CD is divided into four themes, and within each, lyrics and information pertaining to the topic are included.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: Francoislarocque@uottawa.ca 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada
    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative North Americas: What Canada and The
    ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS What Canada and the United States Can Learn from Each Other David T. Jones ALTERNATIVE NORTH AMERICAS Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Copyright © 2014 by David T. Jones All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, scanned, or distributed in any printed or electronic form without permission. Please do not participate in or encourage piracy of copyrighted materials in violation of author’s rights. Published online. ISBN: 978-1-938027-36-9 DEDICATION Once more for Teresa The be and end of it all A Journey of Ten Thousand Years Begins with a Single Day (Forever Tandem) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 Borders—Open Borders and Closing Threats .......................................... 12 Chapter 2 Unsettled Boundaries—That Not Yet Settled Border ................................ 24 Chapter 3 Arctic Sovereignty—Arctic Antics ............................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Immigrants and Refugees .........................................................................54 Chapter 5 Crime and (Lack of) Punishment .............................................................. 78 Chapter 6 Human Rights and Wrongs .................................................................... 102 Chapter 7 Language and Discord ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberals: a House Divided Introduction
    The Liberals: A House Divided Introduction “I will fulfill my mandate and focus entirely on governing from now until February Focus 2004. At which time my work will be done and at which time my successor will be In an unprec- chosen. And then, at the age of 70, I will look back with great satisfaction as I take edented move against a sitting my rest with Aline, secure in the knowledge that the future of Canada is unlim- Canadian prime ited.” — Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, August 21, 2002 minister, a signifi- cant number of Struggle for Power media and political organizers, the buzz Liberal Party mem- The summer of 2002 will be remem- about his future grew louder and louder. bers appeared The Martin camp was particularly ready to vote bered for both the hot weather and the against Jean equally hot political battle waged within active in promoting their man for the Chrétien in a the ranks of the Liberal Party of next leadership campaign. They built a planned leadership Canada. Open political warfare raged powerful organization and raised sub- review next year. inside the heart of Canada’s most stantial funds. Incensed by this pressure The split in the to leave, Chrétien and Martin had a Liberal camp was successful political machine. A party highlighted this that traditionally rallied around its falling out, and Martin left cabinet. spring when Paul leader appeared ready to tear itself apart Liberals were increasingly divided Martin, one of the over the question of leadership. and feared an open battle at a planned main contenders to After the Liberal victory of 2000, convention to review Chrétien’s leader- replace the PM, attention was drawn to the question of ship in February 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS a Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D
    CONSTITUTION-MAKING AS INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS A Case Study of the 1980 Canadian Constitutional Negotiations Adam D. McDonald1, University of Waterloo The Constitution Act, 1982 is a document that profoundly changed the Canadian political landscape. It brought home the highest law of the land; it provided Canadians a mechanism to change their Constitution; it created a Charter of Rights and Freedoms, entrenched within the Constitution, out of the reach of one government. Perhaps its most important legacies, however, are the seemingly permanent isolation of Quebec and the primacy of place in Canadian history it gave Pierre Trudeau. This paper will examine the constitutional history of Canada with a view to determining what made the 1980 negotiating sessions successful when the sessions that led to both the Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord were not. It is important, however, to note that the word “successful” is used in the sense that an agreement was reached. Unlike Meech and Charlottetown, the repatriated constitution did not have unanimity among the participants. The question that comes to mind is this: if the governments did not really agree in 1981, why was a Constitution ratified? More importantly, are there lessons that can be drawn from this agreement that can be applied to the failed accords of the Mulroney era? In order to complete this examination, the paper will be divided into two parts. In the first part, Canada’s constitutional story will be told. This is a necessary part of any examination of the constitutional negotiations, for without knowing what the players wanted historically, one cannot see what was changed by the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    CSP-^ -OK2 1808 Anti-American and Loyalty Arguments In Toronto During the Federal Election Campaigns of 1872, 1874, and 1878 by Evan W. H. Brewer M. A. Thesis D ^& ^% , LitfRAftitS .> e*Sity o< ° Department of History Faculty of Graduate Studies University of Ottawa 1973 ^f\ EVHn'».B. Brewer, Ottawa, 1973. UMI Number: EC55459 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform EC55459 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 i Acknowledgement This Thesis was prepared under the guidance of Professor Joseph Levitt, Department of History, University of Ottawa. ii Outline Page Introduction 1 Chapter I: The United States of America, The Imperial Tie, and the Dominion: Attitudes of Canadian Politicians 5 A. The Dominion and the United States of America ............ 5 B. The Dominion and the British Empire 12 C. The Dominion . 23 Chapter II: Election of 1872 25 Introduction 25 A. The Treaty of Washington in the Election 25 I. The Washington Conference and the Issues............ 25 II.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to the Honourable R. Gordon Robertson, P.C., C.C., LL.D., F.R.S.C., D.C.L
    A Tribute to The Honourable R. Gordon Robertson, P.C., C.C., LL.D., F.R.S.C., D.C.L. By Thomas d’Aquino MacKay United Church Ottawa January 21, 2013 Reverend Doctor Montgomery; members of the Robertson family; Joan - Gordon’s dear companion; Your Excellency; Madam Chief Justice; friends, I am honoured – and humbled – to stand before you today, at Gordon’s request, to pay tribute to him and to celebrate with you his remarkable life. He wished this occasion to be one, not of sadness, but of celebration of a long life, well lived, a life marked by devotion to family and to country. Gordon Robertson – a good, fair, principled, and ever so courteous man - was a modest person. But we here today know that he was a giant. Indeed, he has been described as his generation’s most distinguished public servant – and what a generation that was! Gordon was proud of his Saskatchewan roots. Born in 1917 in Davidson – a town of 300 “on the baldest prairie”, in Gordon’s words, he thrived under the affection of his Norwegian-American mother and grandparents. He met his father – of Scottish ancestry - for the first time at the age of two, when he returned home after convalescing from serious wounds suffered at the epic Canadian victory at Vimy Ridge. He was, by Gordon’s account, a stern disciplinarian who demanded much of his son in his studies, in pursuit of manly sports, and in his comportment. Gordon did not disappoint. He worked his way through drought- and depression-torn Saskatchewan, attended Regina College and the University of Saskatchewan, and in 1938 was on his way to Oxford University, a fresh young Rhodes Scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns
    Choice or Consensus?: The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns Jared J. Wesley PhD Candidate Department of Political Science University of Calgary Paper for Presentation at: The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan May 30, 2007 Comments welcome. Please do not cite without permission. CHOICE OR CONSENSUS?: THE 2006 FEDERAL LIBERAL AND ALBERTA CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGNS INTRODUCTION Two of Canada’s most prominent political dynasties experienced power-shifts on the same weekend in December 2006. The Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta undertook leadership campaigns, which, while different in context, process and substance, produced remarkably similar outcomes. In both instances, so-called ‘dark-horse’ candidates emerged victorious, with Stéphane Dion and Ed Stelmach defeating frontrunners like Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae, Jim Dinning, and Ted Morton. During the campaigns and since, Dion and Stelmach have been labeled as less charismatic than either their predecessors or their opponents, and both of the new leaders have drawn skepticism for their ability to win the next general election.1 This pair of surprising results raises interesting questions about the nature of leadership selection in Canada. Considering that each race was run in an entirely different context, and under an entirely different set of rules, which common factors may have contributed to the similar outcomes? The following study offers a partial answer. In analyzing the platforms of the major contenders in each campaign, the analysis suggests that candidates’ strategies played a significant role in determining the results. Whereas leading contenders opted to pursue direct confrontation over specific policy issues, Dion and Stelmach appeared to benefit by avoiding such conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • History 3231F
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Autumn 2012 HISTORY 3231F “Yours to Discover”: A History of Ontario Roger Hall Time: Wed” 1:30-3:30 Lawson Hall 2228 Place: STVH 2166 hall3@uwo.ca The course is a survey of Ontario’s rich and varied past commencing with its founding as the colony of Upper Canada in the aftermath of the American Revolution and stretching to the modern day. Conducted in the form of a workshop with instructor and students both participating, a chronological frame is followed although individual sessions will pursue separate themes revealing the changing politics, society and economy. Each session, of which there will be two per weekly meeting, will include a brief introduction to the topic by the instructor, and then a verbal report prepared by a student, followed by questions and discussion. Assigned readings should make the discussion informative. Readings will be from prescribed texts, internet and library sources and handouts. There will be no mid-terms in this course. Reports will be made by students throughout the course; the essay themes can be the same as the reports—needless to say a superior performance will be expected in written work. There will be ONE essay and a final examination. GRADE BREAKDOWN Reports: 30% General Class Participation: 20% Essay 25% Final Exam 25% TEXTS: Randall White, Ontario, 1610-1985 (Toronto, Dundurn Press). Edgar-Andre Montigny and Lori Chambers, Ontario since Confederation, A Reader (Toronto, University of Toronto Press) R. Hall, W. Westfall and L. Sefton MacDowell, Patterns of the Past: Interpreting Ontario’s History (Toronto, Dundurn Press).
    [Show full text]