Lynx Lynx Lynx in the Slovak Carpathians Reveals Lower Numbers Than Officially Reported

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lynx Lynx Lynx in the Slovak Carpathians Reveals Lower Numbers Than Officially Reported Robust monitoring of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in the Slovak Carpathians reveals lower numbers than officially reported J AKUB K UBALA,PETER S MOLKO,FRIDOLIN Z IMMERMANN R OBIN R IGG,BRANISLAV T ÁM,TOMÁŠ I Ľ KO,DANILO F ORESTI C HRISTINE B REITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN,RUDOLF K ROPIL and U RS B REITENMOSER Abstract The Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx population in the Introduction Carpathian Mountains is considered to be one of the best pre- served and largestinEurope and hence is a sourcefor pastand he population of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in the current reintroduction projects in central Europe. However, TCarpathian Mountains is considered to be one of the its status in Slovakia has been reported to the European best preserved and largest in Europe (Kaczensky et al., Commission on the basis of hunters´ reports and expert esti- ). It was the source of lynx for several reintroduction mates that have never been validated by a robust scientific ap- projects between the s and the s (Breitenmoser proach. We conducted the first camera-trapping surveys to et al., ; Breitenmoser & Breitenmoser-Würsten, estimate the density of Eurasian lynx in Slovakia by means ). Although some of the re-established populations of spatial capture–recapture models in two reference areas dur- prospered initially, most of them have since stagnated or ing –. We estimated population density per km even declined, and suffer from inbreeding (Breitenmoser- č ć of suitable lynx habitat (posterior SD) as . ± SD . Würsten & Obexer-Ruff, ; Sindi i et al., ). independent individuals (adults and subadults) in the Reinforcement is recommended as a genetic remedy to as- Štiavnica Mountains and . ± SD . in Veľká Fatra sure their long-term viability (Schnidrig et al., ). National Park and surroundings. These are the lowest dens- Many of the translocated individuals came from ities estimated using spatial capture–recapture models so far Slovakia, which encompasses c. % of the Carpathians reported for the species, suggesting the lynx population in and is considered to be a potential source for reinforcements č ć Slovakia is below carrying capacity. We suspect that low dens- and further reintroductions (Sindi i et al., ; Schnidrig ities may be attributable to undetected human-caused mortal- et al., ). The removal of individuals, even for conserva- ity. Our results imply that official game statistics are tion purposes, requires adequate monitoring of the source substantially overestimated. Moreover, the lynx population population (IUCN/SSC, ). Although Slovakia has been in Slovakia may not be at favourable conservation status as re- a member of the European Union since and is there- quired by the EU Habitats Directive. We therefore call for a fore obliged by Council Directive / /EEC of May thorough assessment of the density and trend of the Slovak on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna Carpathian lynx population, and the establishment of a scien- and flora (the Habitats Directive) to monitor, assess and re- tifically robust monitoring system. port on the conservation status of protected species, to date there has been no robust monitoring system for large mam- Keywords Camera trapping, capture–recapture, Carpathians, mals, including the lynx. Reporting to the European favourable conservation status, Lynx lynx, population density Commission has been on the basis of expert estimates of – lynx in Slovakia, and the population’s conservation status is categorized as unfavourable–inadequate (Černecký JAKUB KUBALA* (Corresponding author) Technical University in Zvolen, Faculty et al., ). In contrast, official game statistics based on of Forestry, Department of Applied Zoology and Wildlife Management, T.G. ’ Masaryka 20, Zvolen 960 53, Slovakia. Email [email protected] hunters reports estimated there were , lynx in Slovakia in (NLC, ). In neither case were these of- PETER SMOLKO* and RUDOLF KROPIL Technical University in Zvolen, Slovakia ficial figures validated by a scientific approach. FRIDOLIN ZIMMERMANN,DANILO FORESTI,CHRISTINE BREITENMOSER-WÜRSTEN and URS BREITENMOSER† KORA, Muri, Switzerland Population densities can be estimated reliably from vari- ous types of data, including telemetry and snow tracking ROBIN RIGG Slovak Wildlife Society, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia (Breitenmoser & Breitenmoser-Würsten, ). However, BRANISLAV TÁM Bojnice Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia camera trapping combined with capture–recapture analysis — TOMÁŠ IĽKO Diana Carpathian Wildlife Research, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia has become a widely used approach for elusive but individu- *Also at: Diana—Carpathian Wildlife Research, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia † ally distinguishable species such as the Eurasian lynx (e.g. Also at: University of Bern, Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health, Bern, Switzerland Weingarth et al., ; Pesenti & Zimmermann, ; Received November . Revision requested January . Zimmermann et al., ; Avgan et al., ). To obtain Accepted May . First published online August . the first robust data from the Carpathian Mountains of Oryx, 2019, 53(3), 548–556 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700076X Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 02 Oct 2021 at 09:42:52, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531700076X Eurasian lynx in the Slovak Carpathians 549 Slovakia we conducted camera-trapping surveys in two ref- erence areas. The main goals of our study were to () apply this methodology in Slovakia to estimate lynx population density by spatial and non-spatial capture–recapture mod- els, () compare our results with other estimates of lynx density, and () provide baseline data for ongoing lynx monitoring. Study areas We monitored lynx in two contrasting reference areas: Štiavnica Mountains Protected Landscape Area (IUCN Category V), near the periphery of occupied lynx range, and Veľká Fatra National Park (IUCN Category II), within the core area of the Carpathian population (Hell & Slamčka, ). Štiavnica is the largest volcanic complex in Slovakia, at –, m altitude (Fig. ). Two thirds of the Protected Landscape Area’s km are covered by deciduous and mixed forest; the remainder is a fragmented mosaic of mea- dows and agricultural land around human settlements, with a mean density of persons per km (MPRV SR, ). Veľká Fatra National Park is located c. km north of Š Štiavnica. Mixed and coniferous forests cover % of its FIG. 1 Location of camera-trap stations in (a) tiavnica ľ km , with alpine meadows above the timberline. Mountains Protected Landscape Area (PLA) and (b) Ve ká Fatra National Park (NP) in the Carpathian Mountains of central Human settlements are located on the periphery of the Slovakia. Mean convex polygons were enlarged by buffers of Park and the mean density is people per km (MPRV and km, respectively, resulting in state-spaces in which we SR, ). The topography is largely mountainous, at distinguished unsuitable (shaded) from suitable habitat –, m altitude. Both areas are included in the fragments for the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx. The shaded area in Natura network of protected areas of the EU the inset shows the lynx’s distribution in the Carpathian Habitats Directive (.% of the Protected Landscape Area Mountains (Kaczensky et al., ). and .% of the National Park). Several Carnivora besides lynx are present in both areas, registered hunters/foresters in Štiavnica and six rangers and including brown bears Ursus arctos and wildcats Felis silves- hunters/foresters in Veľká Fatra. Beginning in in tris, and grey wolves Canis lupus are present in Veľká Fatra. Štiavnica and in Veľká Fatra, various models of digital Three species of native ungulates are common: red deer camera were deployed throughout the year along forest Cervus elaphus, roe deer Capreolus capreolus and wild roads, hiking paths, game trails and mountain ridges, as boar Sus scrofa. There are also introduced fallow deer well as at lynx marking sites and kills (Zimmermann Dama dama and mouflon Ovis musimon in Štiavnica, and et al., ). Alpine chamois Rupicapra rupicapra in Veľká Fatra. Timber harvesting and hunting are permitted across most of both areas. Capture–recapture surveys Winter and early spring, before and during the lynx mating Methods season, has been identified as the best period to conduct sys- tematic camera trapping because of biological (i.e. high lynx Pilot surveys activity), logistical (i.e. reduced human disturbance), and environmental factors (Zimmermann & Foresti, ). To enhance the probability of photographing and identify- Given the limited availability of cameras, in Štiavnica we ing lynx during capture–recapture surveys, we conducted used an adjacent block sampling design (Karanth & pilot surveys of .–. years’ duration in each study area. Nichols, ): the western portion of the study area was The choice of study areas and camera-trap sites was based surveyed during January– March, and the eastern block on information resulting from snow tracking as well as during March– May .InVeľká Fatra we surveyed from observations (e.g. lynx sightings, tracks, prey remains) the whole study area simultaneously during December provided by our monitoring network of four rangers and – February . Oryx, 2019, 53(3), 548–556 © 2017 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S003060531700076X Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.14, on 02 Oct 2021 at 09:42:52, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use,
Recommended publications
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciestm
    Species 2014 Annual ReportSpecies the Species of 2014 Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme Species ISSUE 56 2014 Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme • 2014 Spotlight on High-level Interventions IUCN SSC • IUCN Red List at 50 • Specialist Group Reports Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis), Endangered. © Martin Harvey Muhammad Yazid Muhammad © Amazing Species: Bleeding Toad The Bleeding Toad, Leptophryne cruentata, is listed as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. It is endemic to West Java, Indonesia, specifically around Mount Gede, Mount Pangaro and south of Sukabumi. The Bleeding Toad’s scientific name, cruentata, is from the Latin word meaning “bleeding” because of the frog’s overall reddish-purple appearance and blood-red and yellow marbling on its back. Geographical range The population declined drastically after the eruption of Mount Galunggung in 1987. It is Knowledge believed that other declining factors may be habitat alteration, loss, and fragmentation. Experts Although the lethal chytrid fungus, responsible for devastating declines (and possible Get Involved extinctions) in amphibian populations globally, has not been recorded in this area, the sudden decline in a creekside population is reminiscent of declines in similar amphibian species due to the presence of this pathogen. Only one individual Bleeding Toad was sighted from 1990 to 2003. Part of the range of Bleeding Toad is located in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. Future conservation actions should include population surveys and possible captive breeding plans. The production of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is made possible through the IUCN Red List Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in the Vtáčnik Mountains, Slovakia: Importance for the National and European Management and Conservation of the Species
    MONITORING OF THE EURASIAN LYNX (LYNX LYNX) IN THE VTÁČNIK MOUNTAINS, SLOVAKIA: IMPORTANCE FOR THE NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF THE SPECIES KUBALA JAKUB, BRANISLAV TÁM, NUNO FILIPE GUIMARÃES, ĽUBOMÍR FERLICA, TIBOR PATAKY, PETER KLINGA, PETER KOVÁČ, MICHAL BELÁK, EVA GREGOROVÁ, PETER SMOLKO, STJEPAN STOPIĆ, LUKÁŠ HOLÁSEK, PETER GRMAN, PETER HOLKA, BEŇADIK MACHCINÍK, JAROSLAV BRNDIAR, MIRKO KRAJČI & RUDOLF KROPIL Technical University in Zvolen, September 2020 Monitoring of the Eurasian lynx (lynx lynx) in the Vtáčnik Mountains, Slovakia: importance for the national and European management and conservation of the species The publication was developed as part of the LIFE Lynx project “Preventing the Extinction of the Dinaric-SE Alpine Lynx Population through Reinforcement and Long-term Conservation" (LIFE16 NAT / SI / 000634) with financial support from the European Commission Authors: Jakub Kubala – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Branislav Tám – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia, Nuno Filipe Guimarães – OZ DIANA – Carpathian wildlife research, Slovakia, Ľubomír Ferlica – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Tibor Pataky – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Peter Klinga – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Peter Kováč – OZ DIANA – Carpathian wildlife research, Slovakia, Michal Belák – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia, Eva Gregorová – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia, Peter Smolko
    [Show full text]
  • Lynx Lynx - (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Lynx lynx - (Linnaeus, 1758) ANIMALIA - CHORDATA - MAMMALIA - CARNIVORA - FELIDAE - Lynx - lynx Common Names: Lynx (French), Shiluus Mii (Mongolian), LINCE BOREAL (), Evroasiin Shiluus (), Lince Boreal (Spanish), Eurasian Lynx (English), Lince (Spanish; Castilian), Lynx Bor?al (French) Synonyms: No Synonyms Taxonomic Note: Balkan lynx was for the first time described an own subspecies in 1941 by the Bulgarian zoologist Ivan Buresh (Buresh, 1941). The name that Buresh gave to the Balkan lynx was Lyx lyx balcanicus. Later on Serbian mammologist Gjorge Miric did much more thoroughly morphometric measurements on skulls of 29 lynx speciements from the Balkans and concluded differences in the size with the specimens from the neighboring Carpathian population, as well as with specimens from Scandinavia and Caucasus (Miric, 1978). Miric changed the subspecies name of the Balkan lynx into Lynx lynx martinoi with no further references to the previously given name by Buresh.The importance of conservation actions was underline by new and preliminary results from genetic research, indicating that the Balkan lynx is indeed different from the Carpathian lynx and should be accepted as a distinct subspecies (Gugolz et al ., 2008; Breitenmoser et al . 2008). Red List Assessment Assessment Information Assessor(s): Dime Melovski, Macedonian Ecological Society Evaluator(s): (Not specified) Contributor(s): (Not specified) Assessment Rationale Europe The Eurasian lynx was driven extinct in much of western and central Europe over the last few centuries. However, over the past few decades, as a result of conservation action, the status of the species has improved. Reintroductions have restored it to some areas of its former range, although many of these reintroduced populations remain fragmented and extremely small.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitogenome Phylogeny Including Data from Additional Subspecies Provides New Insights Into the Historical Biogeography of the Eurasian Lynx Lynx Lynx
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Mitogenome Phylogeny Including Data from Additional Subspecies Provides New Insights into the Historical Biogeography of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx Deniz Mengüllüo˘glu 1,*, Hüseyin Ambarlı 2 , Axel Barlow 3 , Johanna L. A. Paijmans 4,5 , Ali Onur Sayar 6 , Hasan Emir 7, Irfan˙ Kandemir 8, Heribert Hofer 1,9,10 , Jörns Fickel 1,4 and Daniel W. Förster 1 1 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (H.H.); [email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (D.W.F.) 2 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey; [email protected] 3 School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK; [email protected] 4 Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; [email protected] 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 6 Department of Game and Wildlife, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri 18100, Turkey; [email protected] 7 Wildlife Department of General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara 06000, Turkey; [email protected] 8 Department of Biology, Ankara University, Ankara 06000, Turkey; [email protected] Citation: Mengüllüo˘glu,D.; Ambarlı, 9 Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 10315 Berlin, Germany H.; Barlow, A.; Paijmans, J.L.A.; Sayar, 10 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 10315 Berlin, Germany ˙ A.O.; Emir, H.; Kandemir, I.; Hofer, * Correspondence: [email protected] H.; Fickel, J.; Förster, D.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains
    BOKU-Berichte zur Wildtierforschung und Wildbewirtschaftung 24 16 BOKU-Reports on Wildlife 2021 Research & Game Management ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains A joint publication by International Council for Secretariat of the Game and Wildlife Conservation Carpathian Convention 1 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains Volume Editors: Klaus Hackländer, Jacqueline Frair, Ovidiu Ionescu Series Editor: Ursula Nopp-Mayr BOKU-Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management Nr. 24 ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Recommended citation: Hackländer K, Frair J, Ionescu O (2021): Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains. A joint publication by the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and the Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention. BOKU- Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management 24. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Birgit Lahner for technical assistance and Mark Ryan for language editing. © Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management (IWJ), 2021 Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Gregor Mendel Str. 33 A 1180 Vienna Austria 2 Table of Content Foreword CIC ........................................................................................................ 4 Foreword Carpathian Convention ....................................................................... 6 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and Its Importance for the National and European Management and Species Conservation
    Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and its importance for the national and European management and species conservation Action A.1 - Assessment and Selection of Sites and Lynx for Live- capture from the Carpathian Source Population in Slovakia Jakub Kubala, Nuno Filipe Guimarães, Jaroslav Brndiar, Tomáš Iľko, Mirko Krajči, Ľubomír Ferlica, Tibor Pataky, Peter Klinga, Peter Smolko, Branislav Tám and Rudolf Kropil Technical university in Zvolen June 2019 Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and its importance for the national and European management and species conservation. The publication was developed as part of the LIFE Lynx project "Saving the lynx population in the Dinaric and South-eastern Alps through strengthening and long-term protection" (LIFE16 NAT / SI / 000634) with financial support from the European Commission Authors: Jakub Kubala – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Nuno Filipe Guimarães – Matej Bel University – Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Jaroslav Brndiar – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Tomáš Iľko – State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Revúca, Slovakia Mirko Krajči – State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia Ľubomír Ferlica – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Tibor Pataky – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Peter Klinga – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Peter Smolko – University of Alberta – Edmonton, Canada Branislav Tám – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia Rudolf Kropil – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Map output processing: © Nuno Filipe Guimarães Cover photo: © Technical University in Zvolen Publisher: © Technical University in Zvolen Year of publishing: 2019 Recommended quote: Kubala J., Guimarães N.F., Brndiar J., Iľko T., Krajči M., Ferlica Ľ., Pataky T., Klinga P., Smolko P., Tám B., and Kropil R.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in Europe in 2001
    KORA Bericht Nr. 19 e Juni 2004 ISSN 1422-5123 Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Koordinierte Forschungsprojekte zur Erhaltung und zum Management der Raubtiere in der Schweiz. Coordinated research projects for the conservation and management of carnivores in Switzerland. KORA Projets de recherches coordonnés pour la conservation et la gestion des carnivores en Suisse. KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri. Tel +41-31-951 70 40, Fax +41-31-951 90 40, Email: [email protected], http://www.kora.unibe.ch Lynx Survey Europe 2001 2 KORA Bericht Nr. 19 englisch: Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Bearbeitung Manuela von Arx, Christine Breitenmoser- Adaptation Würsten, Fridolin Zimmermann and Editorship Urs Breitenmoser Bezugsquelle KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Source T +41 31 951 70 40 / F +41 31 951 90 40 Source [email protected] Titelzeichnung Jacques Rime Frontispiece Cover drawing Online Version ELOIS (Eurasian Lynx Online Information System for Europe): http://www.kora.unibe.ch/en/proj/elois/online/index.html The report is also available on CD-Rom at KORA (details see above). Anzahl Seiten/Pages: 330 ISSN 1422-5123 © KORA Juni 2004 Lynx Survey Europe 2001 3 Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Edited by: Manuela von Arx, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, Fridolin Zimmermann, Urs Breitenmoser With the contribution of (in alphabetic order): Zanete Andersone, Henrik Andrén, Dragan Angelovski, Linas Balciauskas, Andriy-Taras Bashta, Ferdinand Bego, Urs Breitenmoser, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, Henrik Brøseth, Ludek Bufka, Marco Catello, Jaroslav Cerveny, Igor Dyky, Thomas Engleder, Michael Fasel, Martin Forstner, Christian Fuxjäger, Peter Genov, Constantinos Godes, Tomislav Gomercic, Eva Gregorova, Gennady Grishanov, Pavel Hell, Ulf Hohmann, Miso Hristovski, Djuro Huber, Thomas Huber, Ditmar Huckschlag, Ovidiu Ionescu, Thomas A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme As an EAZA Breeding Programme (EEP)? Alexander Sliwa*
    The Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme as an EAZA breeding Programme (EEP)? Alexander Sliwa* Iberian Lynx Conference, Madrid, 24th September 2019 *AG Zoologischer Garten Köln (Cologne), Germany, [email protected] Structure of Presentation • Overview of Personal History with Iberian Lynx (IbLynx) Ex-situ Programme • How does an EEP Work within the EAZA Felid TAG? • Specific issues of Felid EEPs: Space competition (Eurasian lynxes, Big cats!) • How do we manage surplus individuals: contraception, separation, old age asssessement of cats, and euthanasia/culling Personal History with the Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme • Advised between 2003 and 2005 on 4 visits, two initial ones with Dr. Urs Breitenmoser, co-chair of IUCN SSC Cat SG. • Discussions with Astrid Vargas early on, for managing the Iblynx Ex-situ population under similar aspects as an EEP. • Attendance and presentations of different IbLynx Ex-situ staff at EAZA Annual Conferences, Felid TAG Mid-year Meetings: Astrid Vargas (Madrid 2006), Antonio Rivas (Valencia), Rodrigo Serra (Belfast ). EAZA (European Association of Zoos and Aquaria) breeding programmes Studbook Coordinator Recommendations • Breeding pairs • Transfers • Husbandry guidelines Taxon Advisory Group • Monitoring • European studbook (ESB) • European Endangered Species Program (EEP) Institutions Zoos Universities Private holders Iberian Lynx EEP • Would be special, as there are differences to a „normal“ EEP in terms of ownership of IbLynxes. These are probably government or local government owned • High political profile and national pride, which leads to emotional reactions on individual lynxes‘ fate. • Strong gearing towards producing ample numbers of suitable lynxes for release back to nature. Thus only limited breeding restrictions, however an accumulation of post-reproductive, health affected, over- represented individual lynxes, taking up valuable high quality space needed for breeding and training.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Seasonal Systematic Camera-Trapping Reveals Fluctuating Densities and High Turnover Rates of Carpathian Lynx on the Wester
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Multi‑seasonal systematic camera‑trapping reveals fuctuating densities and high turnover rates of Carpathian lynx on the western edge of its native range Martin Duľa 1,2*, Michal Bojda1,2, Delphine B. H. Chabanne3,4, Peter Drengubiak5, Ľuboslav Hrdý2, Jarmila Krojerová‑Prokešová6,7, Jakub Kubala9,10, Jiří Labuda1,2, Leona Marčáková2, Teresa Oliveira8, Peter Smolko9,10, Martin Váňa2 & Miroslav Kutal1,2 Camera‑trapping and capture‑recapture models are the most widely used tools for estimating densities of wild felids that have unique coat patterns, such as Eurasian lynx. However, studies dealing with this species are predominantly on a short‑term basis and our knowledge of temporal trends and population persistence is still scarce. By using systematic camera‑trapping and spatial capture‑recapture models, we estimated lynx densities and evaluated density fuctuations, apparent survival, transition rate and individual’s turnover during fve consecutive seasons at three diferent sites situated in the Czech–Slovak–Polish borderland at the periphery of the Western Carpathians. Our density estimates vary between 0.26 and 1.85 lynx/100 km2 suitable habitat and represent the lowest and the highest lynx densities reported from the Carpathians. We recorded 1.5–4.1‑fold changes in asynchronous fuctuated densities among all study sites and seasons. Furthermore, we detected high individual’s turnover (on average 46.3 ± 8.06% in all independent lynx and 37.6 ± 4.22% in adults) as well as low persistence of adults (only 3 out of 29 individuals detected in all seasons). The overall apparent survival rate was 0.63 ± 0.055 and overall transition rate between sites was 0.03 ± 0.019.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Conclusions –
    Strasbourg, 28 October 2019 T-PVS(2019)7 [tpvs07e_2019.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 39th meeting Strasbourg, 3-6 December 2019 __________ EXPERT CONFERENCE ON THE CONSERVATION OF THE LYNX IN WEST AND CENTRAL EUROPE 17-19 June 2019 Bonn (Germany) - MEETING CONCLUSIONS – Document prepared by the organisers of the Conference This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS(2019)7 - 2 - The Standing Committee is invited to: Take note of the expert conclusions and proposals on the conservation state and needs of the different lynx populations and the recommendations made by the expert meeting; Examine and, if appropriate, adopt the following draft Recommendation (Annex 2): o Draft Recommendation No. … (2019) on the conservation of the European lynx in Central and West Europe - 3 - T-PVS(2019)7 Draft proposals for the conservation of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in West and Central Europe Conclusions from the expert workshop on lynx conservation in Bonn, Germany, 1619 June 2019 1. Introduction The first assessment of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx across Europe was initiated by IUCN and WWF International in 1962, when the two organisations asked the Czech zoologist Josef Kratochvíl to review the status of the species across the continent (Kratochvíl et al. 1868a, b). A wider audience however became only aware of the fate of this elusive species when in the early 1970s, the reintroduction programmes started in Western and Central Europe (overview in Breitenmoser & Breitenmoser- Würsten 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Rapports Generaux (2001-2004)
    Strasbourg, 7 July 2005 T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 [inf10a_2005.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS CONVENTION RELATIVE A LA CONSERVATION DE LA VIE SAUVAGE ET DU MILIEU NATUREL DE L'EUROPE Standing Committee Comité permanent 25th meeting 25e Réunion Strasbourg, 28 November-1 December 2005 Strasbourg, 28 novembre-1er décembre 2005 _________ GENERAL REPORTS (2001-2004) RAPPORTS GENERAUX (2001-2004) Memorandum drawn up by the Directorate of Culture and of Cultural and Natural Heritage Note du Secrétariat Général établie par la Direction de la Culture et du Patrmoine culturel et naturel This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 - 2 - General Reports submitted by the Contracting Parties to the Bern Convention / Rapports générauxaux soumis par les Parties contractantes de la Convention de Berne MEMBER STATES ÉTATS MEMBRES 2001-2004 ALBANIA / ALBANIE / AUSTRIA / AUTRICHE BELGIUM / BELGIQUE Yes / Oui BULGARIA / BULGARIE CYPRUS / CHYPRE CZECH REP. / RÉP. TCHÈQUE DENMARK / DANEMARK ESTONIA / ESTONIE FINLAND / FINLANDE FRANCE / FRANCE GERMANY / ALLEMAGNE GREECE / GRÈCE HUNGARY / HONGRIE ICELAND /ISLANDE IRELAND / IRLANDE ITALY / ITALIE LATVIA / LETTONIE LIECHTENSTEIN / LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA / LITUANIE LUXEMBOURG / LUXEMBOURG MALTA / MALTE MOLDOVA / MOLDOVA NETHERLANDS / PAYS-BAS NORWAY / NORVÈGE POLAND / POLOGNE PORTUGAL / PORTUGAL ROMANIA / ROUMANIE SLOVAKIA / SLOVAQUIE Yes / Oui SLOVENIA / SLOVÉNIE SPAIN / ESPAGNE SWEDEN / SUÈDE SWITZERLAND / SUISSE TFYRMACEDONIA / LERYMACEDOINE Yes / Oui TURKEY / TURQUIE UKRAINE / UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM / ROYAUME-UNI EEC / CEE NON MEMBER STATES ÉTATS NON MEMBRES BURKINA FASO MONACO / MONACO Yes / Oui SENEGAL / SENEGAL TUNISIA / TUNISIE - 3 - T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE __________ Pages 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Lynx Population History, Recent Knowledge on Its Status and Conservation Needs
    KORA Bericht Nr. 7 e Juni 2001 ISSN 1422-5123 The Balkan Lynx Population History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs June 2001 Koordinierte Forschungsprojekte zur Erhaltung und zum Management der Raubtiere in der Schweiz. Coordinated research projects for the conservation and management of carnivores in Switzerland. KORA Projets de recherches coordonnés pour la conservation et la gestion des carnivores en Suisse. KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri. Tel +41-31-951 70 40, Fax +41-31-951 90 40, Email: [email protected], http://www.kora.unibe.ch 2 KORA Bericht Nr. 7 KORA Bericht Nr. 7 englisch: The Balkan Lynx Population - History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs Bearbeitung Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Adaptation Urs Breitenmoser Editorial Kora, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Bezugsquelle Kora, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Source T +41 31 951 70 40 / F +41 31 951 90 40 Source [email protected] Titelzeichnung Balkan lynx Frontispice Velizar Simeonovski, Bulgaria Cover picture ©KORA Juni 2001 Juni 2001 3 The Balkan Lynx Population - History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs Edited by Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Urs Breitenmoser Acknowledgements We would like to thank Adrienne Jackson-Farrell for improving the language, and Susanne Hagen and Seraina Klopfstein for editorial help. Ulrich Müller and Matthias Ulrich helped with compiling the summary distribution map. The first Meeting on Balkan Lynx Conservation, held in Plitivice, Croatia, in spring 2000 was financially sup- ported
    [Show full text]