DOCSLIB.ORG

Lynx Lynx) in Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lynx Lynx) in Europe Strasbourg, 5 May 2000 T-PVS (2000) 22 [Bern\T-PVS 2000\tpvs22e_2000] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Group of Experts on Conservation of Large Carnivores Oslo, 22-24 June 2000 Action Plan for the conservation of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe Document established by Urs Breitenmoser This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS (2000) 22 - 2 - by Urs Breitenmoser1, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten2, Henryk Okarma3, Thomas Kaphegyi4, Ursula Kaphegyi-Wallmann4, Ulrich M. Müller1 1Inst. of Veterinary-Virology, University of Bern, Laenggass-Str. 122, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland; 2KORA, Thunstr. 31, CH-3074 Muri, Switzerland; 3Inst. of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz 46, PL-31-512 Cracow, Poland; 4Forstzoologisches Institut, University of Freiburg, Am Forenbühl 27, D-79252 Stegen-Wittental, Germany With the contribution of: Henrik Andrén, Linas Balčiauskas, Janez Čop, Alojzije Frković, Kiril Georgiev, Djuro Huber, Thomas Huber, Ovidu Ionescu, Petra Kaczensky, Theodoros Kominos, Petr Koubek, Tor Kvam, Olof Liberg, Ferenc Márkus, Paolo Molinari, Jánis Ozolinš, Milan Paunović, Anesti Postoli, Maria Panayotopoulou, Tiit Randveer, Nikolai Spassov, Philippe Stahl, Laste Stojanovski, Alexander Tkachenko, Paavo Tunkkari, Andrey Vasiliev, Jean-Michel Vandel, Manfred Wölfl, and Milan Zilinec Funded by WWF International Avenue du Mont Blanc Gland, Switzerland - 3 - T-PVS (2000) 22 The process behind the elaboration of the action plans Each Action Plan was first elaborated by the author in early 1998. These first drafts included input and comments from many experts throughout Europe. In October 1998, governmental experts then discussed the Plans at a meeting organised by the Council of Europe in Slovakia, after which the authors incorporated the comments received. The Plans were then reviewed by the Bern Convention Contracting Parties in December 1998 and again by the European Commission and EU governmental experts at a meeting of the Habitats Directive Scientific Committee in September 1999. All the comments received (and forwarded to the authors by the Commission via the Bern Convention Secretariat) were included in the final draft version presented at the Bern Convention Meeting of The Contracting Parties in December 1999. At this meeting, some governments advised that they still wished to comment on National Actions related to their respective countries and they were given until end February 2000 to send their comments to the Council of Europe. The authors have made every effort to incorporate all the comments received into the final Action Plans and apologise unreservedly should any have slipped through the net. It is clear from the above that these Plans have been through an exhaustive, collaborative process and received a wide consensus, culminating in Recommendation No. 74 (Dec 1999) of the Bern Convention Contracting Parties, December 1999. Where differing figures have been given by various national experts (in particular as regards population numbers), every effort has been made to include both (or all) totals. Disclaimer The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the WWF, the Council of Europe or the LCIE and its affiliated organisations. None of the organisations mentioned above, nor any person acting on their behalf, is responsible for the use which may be made of this document. The designation of geographical entities in the publication and the presentation of material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the LCIE, WWF or the Council of Europe, or their supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. May 2000 T-PVS (2000) 22 - 4 - Contents Mission Statement – The Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE)............................. 5 Preface.......................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 10 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 12 2. Background information ...................................................................................................... 12 2.1. Description of the species .................................................................................................... 12 2.2. Distribution and population numbers................................................................................... 13 2.3. Life history ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Lynx and humans ................................................................................................................. 16 2.5. Threats and limiting factors.................................................................................................. 17 2.6. Legal status, conservation status and recent conservation measures ................................... 19 3. Goals and objectives.............................................................................................................. 21 3.1. Goals..................................................................................................................................... 22 3.2. Objectives............................................................................................................................. 22 4. Actions required to meet goals and objectives on a pan-European level......................... 23 4.1. Policy and species conservation........................................................................................... 24 4.2. Recovery of endangered or extinct populations................................................................... 24 4.3. Resource management: habitat, corridors and food supply ................................................. 25 4.4. Conflicts with humans: depredation and competition to hunters......................................... 25 4.5. Public awareness and public involvement............................................................................ 26 4.6. Research and monitoring...................................................................................................... 26 5. Required actions by countries.............................................................................................. 27 6. References .............................................................................................................................. 55 7. List of contributors................................................................................................................ 57 8. Tables 1-7 ............................................................................................................................... 58 Figure 1. Historical distribution of lynx in Europe ..................................................................... 65 Figure 2. Recent distribution of lynx in Europe.......................................................................... 66 - 5 - T-PVS (2000) 22 Mission statement The Large Carnivore Initiative for Europe (LCIE) “To maintain and restore, in coexistence with people, viable populations of large carnivores as an integral part of ecosystems and landscapes across Europe” Background • Europe, once a broad mosaic of natural habitats ideal for large carnivores, is now left with only scattered tracts of suitable "wildland". Brown bear, wolf, wolverine, Eurasian lynx and Iberian lynx still occur in Europe but they are forced to live in highly fragmented and human-dominated landscapes. • There was widespread and bitter opposition to large carnivores in the past but today there is increasing public interest in their conservation. However, the predatory behaviour of large carnivores often conflicts with local economic activity, especially livestock farming • Their current distribution is often confined to border areas which therefore requires cross border co-operation in order to conserve and manage populations. • The presence of large carnivores is a measure of regional biodiversity. Viable populations of large carnivores demonstrate Europe's contribution to the conservation of global biodiversity. • The political development within Europe, particularly within the European Union, with the partial disintegration of national borders and more unified legal and planning requirements, creates new and promising opportunities for the successful management of large carnivore populations on a European wide scale. • Implementation of the Natura 2000 sites in Europe, the increased priority to the conservation of natural areas, and the Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy (PEBLDS), give exciting opportunities for enhancing Europe's biodiversity. • It is clear that the challenge of conserving large carnivores is complex and dynamic, involving ecological, economic, institutional, political, and cultural factors and any attempt to solve this conservation issue must take this into account. Realistically, no single agency, organisation, or institution will be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciestm
    Species 2014 Annual ReportSpecies the Species of 2014 Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme Species ISSUE 56 2014 Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme • 2014 Spotlight on High-level Interventions IUCN SSC • IUCN Red List at 50 • Specialist Group Reports Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis), Endangered. © Martin Harvey Muhammad Yazid Muhammad © Amazing Species: Bleeding Toad The Bleeding Toad, Leptophryne cruentata, is listed as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. It is endemic to West Java, Indonesia, specifically around Mount Gede, Mount Pangaro and south of Sukabumi. The Bleeding Toad’s scientific name, cruentata, is from the Latin word meaning “bleeding” because of the frog’s overall reddish-purple appearance and blood-red and yellow marbling on its back. Geographical range The population declined drastically after the eruption of Mount Galunggung in 1987. It is Knowledge believed that other declining factors may be habitat alteration, loss, and fragmentation. Experts Although the lethal chytrid fungus, responsible for devastating declines (and possible Get Involved extinctions) in amphibian populations globally, has not been recorded in this area, the sudden decline in a creekside population is reminiscent of declines in similar amphibian species due to the presence of this pathogen. Only one individual Bleeding Toad was sighted from 1990 to 2003. Part of the range of Bleeding Toad is located in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. Future conservation actions should include population surveys and possible captive breeding plans. The production of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is made possible through the IUCN Red List Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in the Vtáčnik Mountains, Slovakia: Importance for the National and European Management and Conservation of the Species
    MONITORING OF THE EURASIAN LYNX (LYNX LYNX) IN THE VTÁČNIK MOUNTAINS, SLOVAKIA: IMPORTANCE FOR THE NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION OF THE SPECIES KUBALA JAKUB, BRANISLAV TÁM, NUNO FILIPE GUIMARÃES, ĽUBOMÍR FERLICA, TIBOR PATAKY, PETER KLINGA, PETER KOVÁČ, MICHAL BELÁK, EVA GREGOROVÁ, PETER SMOLKO, STJEPAN STOPIĆ, LUKÁŠ HOLÁSEK, PETER GRMAN, PETER HOLKA, BEŇADIK MACHCINÍK, JAROSLAV BRNDIAR, MIRKO KRAJČI & RUDOLF KROPIL Technical University in Zvolen, September 2020 Monitoring of the Eurasian lynx (lynx lynx) in the Vtáčnik Mountains, Slovakia: importance for the national and European management and conservation of the species The publication was developed as part of the LIFE Lynx project “Preventing the Extinction of the Dinaric-SE Alpine Lynx Population through Reinforcement and Long-term Conservation" (LIFE16 NAT / SI / 000634) with financial support from the European Commission Authors: Jakub Kubala – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Branislav Tám – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia; Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia, Nuno Filipe Guimarães – OZ DIANA – Carpathian wildlife research, Slovakia, Ľubomír Ferlica – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Tibor Pataky – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Peter Klinga – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia, Peter Kováč – OZ DIANA – Carpathian wildlife research, Slovakia, Michal Belák – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia, Eva Gregorová – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia, Peter Smolko
    [Show full text]
  • Lynx Lynx - (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Lynx lynx - (Linnaeus, 1758) ANIMALIA - CHORDATA - MAMMALIA - CARNIVORA - FELIDAE - Lynx - lynx Common Names: Lynx (French), Shiluus Mii (Mongolian), LINCE BOREAL (), Evroasiin Shiluus (), Lince Boreal (Spanish), Eurasian Lynx (English), Lince (Spanish; Castilian), Lynx Bor?al (French) Synonyms: No Synonyms Taxonomic Note: Balkan lynx was for the first time described an own subspecies in 1941 by the Bulgarian zoologist Ivan Buresh (Buresh, 1941). The name that Buresh gave to the Balkan lynx was Lyx lyx balcanicus. Later on Serbian mammologist Gjorge Miric did much more thoroughly morphometric measurements on skulls of 29 lynx speciements from the Balkans and concluded differences in the size with the specimens from the neighboring Carpathian population, as well as with specimens from Scandinavia and Caucasus (Miric, 1978). Miric changed the subspecies name of the Balkan lynx into Lynx lynx martinoi with no further references to the previously given name by Buresh.The importance of conservation actions was underline by new and preliminary results from genetic research, indicating that the Balkan lynx is indeed different from the Carpathian lynx and should be accepted as a distinct subspecies (Gugolz et al ., 2008; Breitenmoser et al . 2008). Red List Assessment Assessment Information Assessor(s): Dime Melovski, Macedonian Ecological Society Evaluator(s): (Not specified) Contributor(s): (Not specified) Assessment Rationale Europe The Eurasian lynx was driven extinct in much of western and central Europe over the last few centuries. However, over the past few decades, as a result of conservation action, the status of the species has improved. Reintroductions have restored it to some areas of its former range, although many of these reintroduced populations remain fragmented and extremely small.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitogenome Phylogeny Including Data from Additional Subspecies Provides New Insights Into the Historical Biogeography of the Eurasian Lynx Lynx Lynx
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Mitogenome Phylogeny Including Data from Additional Subspecies Provides New Insights into the Historical Biogeography of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx Deniz Mengüllüo˘glu 1,*, Hüseyin Ambarlı 2 , Axel Barlow 3 , Johanna L. A. Paijmans 4,5 , Ali Onur Sayar 6 , Hasan Emir 7, Irfan˙ Kandemir 8, Heribert Hofer 1,9,10 , Jörns Fickel 1,4 and Daniel W. Förster 1 1 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (H.H.); [email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (D.W.F.) 2 Department of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey; [email protected] 3 School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK; [email protected] 4 Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany; [email protected] 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK 6 Department of Game and Wildlife, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri 18100, Turkey; [email protected] 7 Wildlife Department of General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara 06000, Turkey; [email protected] 8 Department of Biology, Ankara University, Ankara 06000, Turkey; [email protected] Citation: Mengüllüo˘glu,D.; Ambarlı, 9 Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin, 10315 Berlin, Germany H.; Barlow, A.; Paijmans, J.L.A.; Sayar, 10 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 10315 Berlin, Germany ˙ A.O.; Emir, H.; Kandemir, I.; Hofer, * Correspondence: [email protected] H.; Fickel, J.; Förster, D.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains
    BOKU-Berichte zur Wildtierforschung und Wildbewirtschaftung 24 16 BOKU-Reports on Wildlife 2021 Research & Game Management ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains A joint publication by International Council for Secretariat of the Game and Wildlife Conservation Carpathian Convention 1 Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains Volume Editors: Klaus Hackländer, Jacqueline Frair, Ovidiu Ionescu Series Editor: Ursula Nopp-Mayr BOKU-Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management Nr. 24 ISSN 1021-3252 ISSN (online) 2788-5747 Recommended citation: Hackländer K, Frair J, Ionescu O (2021): Large Carnivore Monitoring in the Carpathian Mountains. A joint publication by the International Council for Game and Wildlife Conservation and the Secretariat of the Carpathian Convention. BOKU- Reports on Wildlife Research & Game Management 24. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to Birgit Lahner for technical assistance and Mark Ryan for language editing. © Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management (IWJ), 2021 Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research (DIBB) University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Gregor Mendel Str. 33 A 1180 Vienna Austria 2 Table of Content Foreword CIC ........................................................................................................ 4 Foreword Carpathian Convention ....................................................................... 6 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and Its Importance for the National and European Management and Species Conservation
    Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and its importance for the national and European management and species conservation Action A.1 - Assessment and Selection of Sites and Lynx for Live- capture from the Carpathian Source Population in Slovakia Jakub Kubala, Nuno Filipe Guimarães, Jaroslav Brndiar, Tomáš Iľko, Mirko Krajči, Ľubomír Ferlica, Tibor Pataky, Peter Klinga, Peter Smolko, Branislav Tám and Rudolf Kropil Technical university in Zvolen June 2019 Monitoring of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Vepor Mountains and its importance for the national and European management and species conservation. The publication was developed as part of the LIFE Lynx project "Saving the lynx population in the Dinaric and South-eastern Alps through strengthening and long-term protection" (LIFE16 NAT / SI / 000634) with financial support from the European Commission Authors: Jakub Kubala – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Nuno Filipe Guimarães – Matej Bel University – Banská Bystrica, Slovakia Jaroslav Brndiar – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Tomáš Iľko – State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Revúca, Slovakia Mirko Krajči – State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic, Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia Ľubomír Ferlica – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Tibor Pataky – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Peter Klinga – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Peter Smolko – University of Alberta – Edmonton, Canada Branislav Tám – Bojnice National Zoo, Bojnice, Slovakia Rudolf Kropil – Technical university in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia Map output processing: © Nuno Filipe Guimarães Cover photo: © Technical University in Zvolen Publisher: © Technical University in Zvolen Year of publishing: 2019 Recommended quote: Kubala J., Guimarães N.F., Brndiar J., Iľko T., Krajči M., Ferlica Ľ., Pataky T., Klinga P., Smolko P., Tám B., and Kropil R.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation of the Eurasian Lynx (Lynx Lynx) in Europe in 2001
    KORA Bericht Nr. 19 e Juni 2004 ISSN 1422-5123 Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Koordinierte Forschungsprojekte zur Erhaltung und zum Management der Raubtiere in der Schweiz. Coordinated research projects for the conservation and management of carnivores in Switzerland. KORA Projets de recherches coordonnés pour la conservation et la gestion des carnivores en Suisse. KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri. Tel +41-31-951 70 40, Fax +41-31-951 90 40, Email: [email protected], http://www.kora.unibe.ch Lynx Survey Europe 2001 2 KORA Bericht Nr. 19 englisch: Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Bearbeitung Manuela von Arx, Christine Breitenmoser- Adaptation Würsten, Fridolin Zimmermann and Editorship Urs Breitenmoser Bezugsquelle KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Source T +41 31 951 70 40 / F +41 31 951 90 40 Source [email protected] Titelzeichnung Jacques Rime Frontispiece Cover drawing Online Version ELOIS (Eurasian Lynx Online Information System for Europe): http://www.kora.unibe.ch/en/proj/elois/online/index.html The report is also available on CD-Rom at KORA (details see above). Anzahl Seiten/Pages: 330 ISSN 1422-5123 © KORA Juni 2004 Lynx Survey Europe 2001 3 Status and conservation of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Europe in 2001 Edited by: Manuela von Arx, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, Fridolin Zimmermann, Urs Breitenmoser With the contribution of (in alphabetic order): Zanete Andersone, Henrik Andrén, Dragan Angelovski, Linas Balciauskas, Andriy-Taras Bashta, Ferdinand Bego, Urs Breitenmoser, Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten, Henrik Brøseth, Ludek Bufka, Marco Catello, Jaroslav Cerveny, Igor Dyky, Thomas Engleder, Michael Fasel, Martin Forstner, Christian Fuxjäger, Peter Genov, Constantinos Godes, Tomislav Gomercic, Eva Gregorova, Gennady Grishanov, Pavel Hell, Ulf Hohmann, Miso Hristovski, Djuro Huber, Thomas Huber, Ditmar Huckschlag, Ovidiu Ionescu, Thomas A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme As an EAZA Breeding Programme (EEP)? Alexander Sliwa*
    The Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme as an EAZA breeding Programme (EEP)? Alexander Sliwa* Iberian Lynx Conference, Madrid, 24th September 2019 *AG Zoologischer Garten Köln (Cologne), Germany, [email protected] Structure of Presentation • Overview of Personal History with Iberian Lynx (IbLynx) Ex-situ Programme • How does an EEP Work within the EAZA Felid TAG? • Specific issues of Felid EEPs: Space competition (Eurasian lynxes, Big cats!) • How do we manage surplus individuals: contraception, separation, old age asssessement of cats, and euthanasia/culling Personal History with the Iberian Lynx Ex-Situ Programme • Advised between 2003 and 2005 on 4 visits, two initial ones with Dr. Urs Breitenmoser, co-chair of IUCN SSC Cat SG. • Discussions with Astrid Vargas early on, for managing the Iblynx Ex-situ population under similar aspects as an EEP. • Attendance and presentations of different IbLynx Ex-situ staff at EAZA Annual Conferences, Felid TAG Mid-year Meetings: Astrid Vargas (Madrid 2006), Antonio Rivas (Valencia), Rodrigo Serra (Belfast ). EAZA (European Association of Zoos and Aquaria) breeding programmes Studbook Coordinator Recommendations • Breeding pairs • Transfers • Husbandry guidelines Taxon Advisory Group • Monitoring • European studbook (ESB) • European Endangered Species Program (EEP) Institutions Zoos Universities Private holders Iberian Lynx EEP • Would be special, as there are differences to a „normal“ EEP in terms of ownership of IbLynxes. These are probably government or local government owned • High political profile and national pride, which leads to emotional reactions on individual lynxes‘ fate. • Strong gearing towards producing ample numbers of suitable lynxes for release back to nature. Thus only limited breeding restrictions, however an accumulation of post-reproductive, health affected, over- represented individual lynxes, taking up valuable high quality space needed for breeding and training.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Seasonal Systematic Camera-Trapping Reveals Fluctuating Densities and High Turnover Rates of Carpathian Lynx on the Wester
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Multi‑seasonal systematic camera‑trapping reveals fuctuating densities and high turnover rates of Carpathian lynx on the western edge of its native range Martin Duľa 1,2*, Michal Bojda1,2, Delphine B. H. Chabanne3,4, Peter Drengubiak5, Ľuboslav Hrdý2, Jarmila Krojerová‑Prokešová6,7, Jakub Kubala9,10, Jiří Labuda1,2, Leona Marčáková2, Teresa Oliveira8, Peter Smolko9,10, Martin Váňa2 & Miroslav Kutal1,2 Camera‑trapping and capture‑recapture models are the most widely used tools for estimating densities of wild felids that have unique coat patterns, such as Eurasian lynx. However, studies dealing with this species are predominantly on a short‑term basis and our knowledge of temporal trends and population persistence is still scarce. By using systematic camera‑trapping and spatial capture‑recapture models, we estimated lynx densities and evaluated density fuctuations, apparent survival, transition rate and individual’s turnover during fve consecutive seasons at three diferent sites situated in the Czech–Slovak–Polish borderland at the periphery of the Western Carpathians. Our density estimates vary between 0.26 and 1.85 lynx/100 km2 suitable habitat and represent the lowest and the highest lynx densities reported from the Carpathians. We recorded 1.5–4.1‑fold changes in asynchronous fuctuated densities among all study sites and seasons. Furthermore, we detected high individual’s turnover (on average 46.3 ± 8.06% in all independent lynx and 37.6 ± 4.22% in adults) as well as low persistence of adults (only 3 out of 29 individuals detected in all seasons). The overall apparent survival rate was 0.63 ± 0.055 and overall transition rate between sites was 0.03 ± 0.019.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Conclusions –
    Strasbourg, 28 October 2019 T-PVS(2019)7 [tpvs07e_2019.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 39th meeting Strasbourg, 3-6 December 2019 __________ EXPERT CONFERENCE ON THE CONSERVATION OF THE LYNX IN WEST AND CENTRAL EUROPE 17-19 June 2019 Bonn (Germany) - MEETING CONCLUSIONS – Document prepared by the organisers of the Conference This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS(2019)7 - 2 - The Standing Committee is invited to: Take note of the expert conclusions and proposals on the conservation state and needs of the different lynx populations and the recommendations made by the expert meeting; Examine and, if appropriate, adopt the following draft Recommendation (Annex 2): o Draft Recommendation No. … (2019) on the conservation of the European lynx in Central and West Europe - 3 - T-PVS(2019)7 Draft proposals for the conservation of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx in West and Central Europe Conclusions from the expert workshop on lynx conservation in Bonn, Germany, 1619 June 2019 1. Introduction The first assessment of the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx across Europe was initiated by IUCN and WWF International in 1962, when the two organisations asked the Czech zoologist Josef Kratochvíl to review the status of the species across the continent (Kratochvíl et al. 1868a, b). A wider audience however became only aware of the fate of this elusive species when in the early 1970s, the reintroduction programmes started in Western and Central Europe (overview in Breitenmoser & Breitenmoser- Würsten 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Rapports Generaux (2001-2004)
    Strasbourg, 7 July 2005 T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 [inf10a_2005.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS CONVENTION RELATIVE A LA CONSERVATION DE LA VIE SAUVAGE ET DU MILIEU NATUREL DE L'EUROPE Standing Committee Comité permanent 25th meeting 25e Réunion Strasbourg, 28 November-1 December 2005 Strasbourg, 28 novembre-1er décembre 2005 _________ GENERAL REPORTS (2001-2004) RAPPORTS GENERAUX (2001-2004) Memorandum drawn up by the Directorate of Culture and of Cultural and Natural Heritage Note du Secrétariat Général établie par la Direction de la Culture et du Patrmoine culturel et naturel This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 - 2 - General Reports submitted by the Contracting Parties to the Bern Convention / Rapports générauxaux soumis par les Parties contractantes de la Convention de Berne MEMBER STATES ÉTATS MEMBRES 2001-2004 ALBANIA / ALBANIE / AUSTRIA / AUTRICHE BELGIUM / BELGIQUE Yes / Oui BULGARIA / BULGARIE CYPRUS / CHYPRE CZECH REP. / RÉP. TCHÈQUE DENMARK / DANEMARK ESTONIA / ESTONIE FINLAND / FINLANDE FRANCE / FRANCE GERMANY / ALLEMAGNE GREECE / GRÈCE HUNGARY / HONGRIE ICELAND /ISLANDE IRELAND / IRLANDE ITALY / ITALIE LATVIA / LETTONIE LIECHTENSTEIN / LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA / LITUANIE LUXEMBOURG / LUXEMBOURG MALTA / MALTE MOLDOVA / MOLDOVA NETHERLANDS / PAYS-BAS NORWAY / NORVÈGE POLAND / POLOGNE PORTUGAL / PORTUGAL ROMANIA / ROUMANIE SLOVAKIA / SLOVAQUIE Yes / Oui SLOVENIA / SLOVÉNIE SPAIN / ESPAGNE SWEDEN / SUÈDE SWITZERLAND / SUISSE TFYRMACEDONIA / LERYMACEDOINE Yes / Oui TURKEY / TURQUIE UKRAINE / UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM / ROYAUME-UNI EEC / CEE NON MEMBER STATES ÉTATS NON MEMBRES BURKINA FASO MONACO / MONACO Yes / Oui SENEGAL / SENEGAL TUNISIA / TUNISIE - 3 - T-PVS/Inf (2005) 10 CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE __________ Pages 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Lynx Population History, Recent Knowledge on Its Status and Conservation Needs
    KORA Bericht Nr. 7 e Juni 2001 ISSN 1422-5123 The Balkan Lynx Population History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs June 2001 Koordinierte Forschungsprojekte zur Erhaltung und zum Management der Raubtiere in der Schweiz. Coordinated research projects for the conservation and management of carnivores in Switzerland. KORA Projets de recherches coordonnés pour la conservation et la gestion des carnivores en Suisse. KORA, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri. Tel +41-31-951 70 40, Fax +41-31-951 90 40, Email: [email protected], http://www.kora.unibe.ch 2 KORA Bericht Nr. 7 KORA Bericht Nr. 7 englisch: The Balkan Lynx Population - History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs Bearbeitung Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Adaptation Urs Breitenmoser Editorial Kora, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Bezugsquelle Kora, Thunstrasse 31, CH-3074 Muri Source T +41 31 951 70 40 / F +41 31 951 90 40 Source [email protected] Titelzeichnung Balkan lynx Frontispice Velizar Simeonovski, Bulgaria Cover picture ©KORA Juni 2001 Juni 2001 3 The Balkan Lynx Population - History, Recent Knowledge on its Status and Conservation Needs Edited by Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten and Urs Breitenmoser Acknowledgements We would like to thank Adrienne Jackson-Farrell for improving the language, and Susanne Hagen and Seraina Klopfstein for editorial help. Ulrich Müller and Matthias Ulrich helped with compiling the summary distribution map. The first Meeting on Balkan Lynx Conservation, held in Plitivice, Croatia, in spring 2000 was financially sup- ported
    [Show full text]