arXiv:1701.03127v1 [cond-mat.supr-con] 11 Jan 2017 scnre ytesmcnutn rpriso e.g. of properties semiconducting the which BaMn by compounds, parent confirmed Mott-type is the as regarded be 1 n 3.SnetebscF-slyr ihformally with layers Fe-As itinerancy basic electron the of Since Fe degree 13]. the and [12 and elec- correlation of importance and tron the pnictides about Fe-based particular of in structure chalcogenides, electronic the of tion 11]. and [10 oee,hl-le ytm with systems half-filled however, r nuaoswt ag emmnsof moments Fe large with insulators are uaos h iuto sls la o hi Fe-based BaFe their or pnic- for LaOFeAs non-superconducting like clear instance, tides less For is in- situation counterparts. transfer) The (charge Mott sulators. are superconductors research. cuprate of topic in ongoing microscale an the is systems on Fe-based superconductivity coexis- the mag- and of possible SDW) order The wave, (spin-density netic types [4]. specific enabling pairs of mechanism Cooper tence of the spin- formation as interplay and the considered ox- subtle superconductivity, the are a for and fluctuations as is magnetism Similar there between rela- [1–3]. superconductors, non-superconducting compounds ocuprate these the mag- of the by tives model adopted theoretically states intense and netic initiated investigate has to chalcogenides efforts and pnictides based niermgeswt o ree oet tteiron the at ( moments sites ordered low with antiferromagnets hr sa non eaeaottepoe descrip- proper the about debate ongoing an is There h icvr fhigh- of discovery The h niermgei am aetcmonsof compounds parent (afm) antiferromagnetic The niermgei tutr n lcrncpoete of properties electronic and structure Antiferromagnetic 2+ osi h aetcmonscnttt multi- a constitute compounds parent the in ions 2 < As 1 nra Hoser, Andreas 2 1 µ a lnkIsiuefrCeia hsc fSld,N¨othn Solids, of Physics Chemical for Institute Planck Max B 59 swl so aMA n LiMnAs and LaOMnAs of as well as [5–9] a .Filsinger, A. Kai oet n hsi sdsaiie ihicesn rncon iron increasing with destabilized is it thus and moments ata antcdsre fF.Orrslsidct htN that indicate results Our Fe. of BaCrFeAs disorder in magnetic transport partial electrical the and htol ml ree oeti soitdwt h eato Fe the with associated is moment with ordered calculations small structure a only that ec ealcatfroantcgon ttsfrbt co BaCr both for for calcul confirm states we DFT-based ground antiferromagnetic superconductors. metallic new dence possible for pounds with G I olwta ftettlmmns ohcmonsaemetalli are compounds coefficient Both heat moments. specific total linear the the of that follow ln ffcs nBaCrFeAs In effects. pling ,weescacgndslk K like chalcogenides whereas ), 4 tp re sfudblw25Kwith K 265 below found is order -type 3 h hoimasndsBaCr arsenides chromium The /mmm 4 a lnkIsiueo irsrcuePyis eneg2 Weinberg Physics, Microstructure of Institute Planck Max eateto hmsr n hmclBooy ugr Univ Rutgers Biology, Chemical and Chemistry of Department .INTRODUCTION I. µ Cr 2 emot-etu elnfu aeile n nri,141 Energie, und f¨ur Materialien Berlin Helmholtz-Zentrum 1 = loaotdb 12 rnasnd uecnutr)have superconductors) arsenide iron ‘122’ by adopted also ; . 9 2 T µ esUeHoffmann, Jens-Uwe c B 2 uecnutvt niron- in superconductivity As 1 at 2 atrSchnelle, Walter As T 2 d 5 r ealc itinerant metallic, are .Aoaisi h atc aaeespitt magneto-s to point parameters lattice the in Anomalies K. 2 = 2 ofiuainhv to have configuration outodrn nteantiferromagnetic the in ordering robust a 2 µ Fe h radF tm admyocp h rniinmtlsit transition-metal the occupy randomly atoms Fe and Cr the ≈ ∼ 3 2 µ As γ .Tetmeauedpnec ftehprn edde not does field hyperfine the of dependence temperature The 0. B 0 Dtd aur 3 2017) 13, January (Dated: ihrsett h adsrcuevle.Temtli stat metallic The values. structure band the to respect with . 2 Strictly, . 8 2 1 Fe n BaCrFeAs and µ ee Werner, Peter ee Adler, Peter Cr 1 2 . 6 / sdmntdb h tmcdsre fC n eand Fe and Cr of disorder atomic the by dominated is Fe Se 2 1 = . 1 hr ieclso h re ffmoeod,a derived as [13]. femtoseconds, experiments of photoemission on order from moments the which of magnetic 14]), timescales large short and of from [3 existence arising the metals rationalizes (Hund’s effects coupling correlation rule Hund’s pronounced systems Fe- show these electronic the between itinerant may even that in instance, are For believed chalcogenides extremes. is experi- and it from pnictides many actually emerged based the and have describe studies which can mental magnetism views limiting of the facets of How- none moments. ever, Heisenberg-type localized of between terms interactions and in the exchange insulators modeled On was Mott-type magnetism as the discussed se- nesting. correlated been strongly surface have more Fermi lenides the particular to in consid- due hand, magnetic other been formed SDW have a is where pnictides adopted: metals state iron correlated been weakly the as have hand, ered of one views be the to opposing On believed Two also is importance. ordering orbital system, orbital dpstettaoa ThCr tetragonal the adopts h o-eprtr rhrobccytlsrcue[16]. BaFe structure crystal orthorhombic low-temperature the osprodcigsae 2] ncnrs oBaFe lead to contrast not In does [23]. Mn supercon- states like induces superconducting [20–22] others to Ru by even substitution or high ductivity, by Ni transition or Co, some 18] by like Fe and of metals 17, substitution While [15, doping [19]. electron pressure or hole by tor tro eprtr n etrsacnoiatstruc- at concomitant transition a magnetic features and and tural temperature room at h affildM-nlgeBaMn Mn-analogue half-filled the et faot0 about of ments T µ N B 2 1 nipratpooyesse sBaFe is system prototype important An . 3 ihThCr with tielk f re cuswt auae emo- Fe saturated with occurs order afm stripe-like a ehr .Fecher, H. Gerhard 57 2 ataGreenblatt, Martha pud.B odrnurndiffraction neutron powder By mpounds. eMosae pcrsoydemonstrates M¨ossbauerFe spectroscopy As te tae4,017Dedn Germany Dresden, 01187 40, Straße itzer e ltp re sufvrbefrteFe the for unfavorable is ´eel-type order tent. 2 toso h lcrncsrcueevi- structure electronic the of ations a ecnetdit high- a into converted be can 62 al Sae,Germany (Saale), Halle 06120 , u hwlreehneet of enhancements large show but c s nareetwt electronic with agreement in ms, 2 Si riy ictwy J USA NJ, Piscataway, ersity, G ensgetda ohrcom- mother as suggested been 2 tp tutr at structure -type 9Bri,Germany Berlin, 09 . yesrcue(pc group (space structure type 9 BaCr µ B en lge ln the along aligned being 1 4 afe Reehuis, Manfred 2 n lui Felser Claudia and As 2 Si rcua cou- tructural 2 2 T tp rsa structure crystal -type n BaCrFeAs and T 2 N N As 8 K 580 = 3 1] Below [15]. K 132 = 2 and e ean tetrago- remains T c e 2 superconduc- 2 As 1 a 2 xsof axis which 2 As 2 2 , 2 nal down to low temperatures and adopts a G-type afm states for both compounds. Experimentally, it is shown spin structure with a high ordered moment (3.9µB) and that both compounds in fact feature G-type afm order, a high ordering temperature of 625K [7 and 8]. Sim- where the N´eel temperature TN = 580K of BaCr2As2 is ilarly high N´eel temperatures (692–758 K) and G-type nearly as high as that of BaMn2As2, although the mag- afm have been observed for the Cr species in the isostruc- netic moment is only half as large. Both compounds are tural silicides RCr2Si2 (R = Tb, Ho, Er) [24]. metallic conductors. BaCrFeAs2 turns out to be atom- Superconductivity in manganese and chromium com- ically disordered, and thus only average magnetic mo- pounds is very rare and only recently representatives have ments are obtained from neutron diffraction. Most in- been found. The first, binary CrAs, has been long known terestingly, the Fe M¨ossbauer spectra indicate that the for its structural and helimagnetic ordering transition at Fe magnetic moments are much smaller than those of Cr 240–190K with sizable Cr moments of 1.67µB [25]. The and of similar size as in BaFe2As2. TN decreases with ordering temperature decreases dramatically to zero for increasing iron content, thus the G-type order is unfa- pressures of 0.7–0.8 GPa and superconductivity with crit- vorable for the Fe moments. The itinerant character of ical temperature up to 2.2K appears [26 and 27]. At am- the magnetism persists in the whole stability range of the bient pressure superconductivity has been investigated in G-type order, whereas BaMn2As2 with the same nominal the new A2Cr3As2 (A = K, Rb, Cs) compounds featuring d electron count as BaCrFeAs2 is a semiconductor. quasi onedimensional Cr3As3 tubes [28 and 29]. The Mott scenario for the transition-metal arsenides [30] considers a mirror-symmetry in the many-body II. EXPERIMENTAL & CALCULATION physics arising when the half-filled d5 configuration is ei- DETAILS ther doped by electrons or by holes. The Cr compounds formally have a d4 configuration and in this sense are the hole-doped analogues to the electron-doped d6 system BaFe2As2. Recently, some theoretical studies explored the possibilities to find superconductivity for BaM2As2 and LaOMAs with transition-metals M (or mixtures) with less than 5 electrons [31 and 32]. Emphasis in these works is put on the strength of correlations in dependence of the band filling. It is hoped that correlations similar to those in the actual iron-based high Tc materials lead to superconductivity. Here, we focus on the system Ba(Fe1−xCrx)2As2, where no superconducting compositions have been found so far [23, 33, and 34]. Theoretical calculations predicted an afm checkerboard (G-type) ordering in the end mem- ber BaCr2As2 [35] and a ferromagnetic (fm) ground state in atomically ordered BaCrFeAs2 [7]. Another electronic structure calculation predicted ordered BaCrFeAs2 as a fully compensated antiferromagnet with an iron moment of 2.6 µB [36]. Such a material could be relevant for spin- tronics applications. Neutron diffraction studies on iron- rich BaFe2−xCrxAs2 single crystals with 0

TABLE I. Results of the crystal structure refinements for BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2. Powder neutron diffraction data were collected at T = 2 K on the instrument E9. The re- finements of the data sets were carried out in the tetragonal space group I4/mmm. The isotropic temperature factors of the different atoms were constrained to be equal.

BaCr2As2 at 2 K, RN = 0.0480 a = 3.9503(2) A,˚ c = 13.6047(10) A,˚ Z = 2, V = 212.30(3) A˚3 atom site xyz B (A˚2) Ba 2a 0 0 0 0.32(3) 1 1 Cr 4d 0 2 4 0.32(3) As 4e 0 0 0.36092(14) 0.32(3) BaCrFeAs2 at 2 K, RN = 0.0402 a = 3.9793(1) A,˚ c = 13.2532(4) A,˚ Z = 2, V = 209.86(1) A˚3 atom site xyz B (A˚2) Ba 2a 0 0 0 0.19(2) 1 1 Cr 4d 0 2 4 0.19(2) 1 1 Fe 4d 0 2 4 0.19(2) As 4e 0 0 0.35779(10) 0.19(2)

alloyed structure it was assumed that Fe and Cr occupy both the 2c and 2d position in a 50:50 ratio.

III. RESULTS FIG. 2. Neutron diffraction patterns of BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2 powder taken at T = 2 K. The calculated pat- terns of the pure nuclear contribution (blue) as well as the A. Crystal structures sum of the nuclear and the magnetic contribution (red) are compared with the observed ones (black full circles). In the lower part the positions of the Bragg peaks are given (black The crystal structures of BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2 were investigated by powder neutron diffraction. Note ticks). The BaCr2As2 sample contained an impurity (posi- tions marked with ∗), which could not be identified so far. that below TN = 580K, respectively 265K, the pat- terns also included magnetic Bragg intensity (see Sec- tion III E). Both compounds crystallize in the tetrag- onal SG I4/mmm (No. 139), where the Ba, Cr(Fe), 0.043. The results of the Rietveld refinements of the data and As atoms occupy the Wyckoff positions 2a(0,0,0), sets collected at 2 K are given in Table I. It is emphasized 1 1 that there are no indications of superstructure reflections 4d(0, 2 , 4 ), 4e(0,0,z), respectively. The same SG was re- ported earlier for BaMn2As2 [6]. From the data sets col- which would point to atomic order of Cr and Fe atoms. lected on the fine-resolution powder diffractometer E9 we Figure 3a shows the temperature dependence of the cell could not find any additional peak splitting indicating a parameters as well as the cell volume. For BaCrFeAs2 lower crystal structure symmetry. The refinements of the the lattice parameters a and c show a continuous in- crystal structure of BaCr2As2 from data sets recorded crease from 2 up to 275K, which is above the magnetic in the temperature range from 2 up to 750K resulted ordering temperature TN = 265(5) K. A similar trend in residuals between RN = 0.048 and 0.088 [defined as was found for BaMn2As2 [6]. A continuous increase of RN = (Σ||Fobs| − |Fcalc||)/Σ|Fobs|]. These values are a and b was also observed for BaCr2As2 but only in the somewhat larger than expected. This can be ascribed to range from 2 K up to about 300 K. Further heating up to the fact, that the investigated sample contained an im- 700K leads to a decrease of the c parameter, while the purity, which could not be characterized so far (see Fig- increase of the a-parameter becomes somewhat more pro- ure 2). Further, additional impurity peaks of the sample nounced (see Figure 3). As a consequence, the ratio c/a container were observed in the diffraction patterns using decreases from 3.43 at 300K to 3.34 at 750K. The former the high temperature furnace on E9. Nevertheless, the value is in agreement with literature data [49]. These re- lattice parameters, as well as the positional parameters sults indicate that the magnetic transition in BaCr2As2 is of BaCr2As2 could be refined with good accuracy. In accompanied by subtle structural modifications, in con- the case of BaCrFeAs2 the crystal structure was inves- trast to BaMn2As2 [6]. The anomaly in the c param- tigated in the temperature range between 2 and 275K. eter is reflected in the change of the distance between Due to the higher purity of this sample the refinements the arsenic atoms lying along the c direction. Namely, resulted in smaller residuals between RN = 0.035 and one observes a decrease of the distance d(As-As) between 5

state down to 2K. Above 650K both bond angles seem to reach saturation values. In contrast, the two bond angles for BaCrFeAs2 are practically unchanged between 2 and 275 K. However, both pnictides do not reach the ◦ ideal tetrahedron angle of 109.47 . The CrAs4 tetrahedra in BaCr2As2 are stronger distorted than the Cr/FeAs4 tetrahedra in BaCrFeAs2.

B. Electronic structure of BaCr2As2

In Figure 5 the Fermi surface of BaCr2As2 is shown. Three bands are crossing the Fermi energy ǫF, resulting in three iso-surfaces. The innermost one is closed and has a cushion shape. It is related to a hole pocket around the FIG. 3. Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters Γ point. The outer two are open at top and bottom and and the cell volumes of BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2. These have corrugated cylinder shapes with fourfold arranged ⋆ values were determined from data sets collected on the in- bulges. The effective band mass m /me of the innermost struments E2 and E9. hole pocket was determined for the ∆ and Σ directions ⋆ ⋆ revealing values of m∆ = −0.63 and mΣ = −0.39 at the Γ point. This hints that this band is in the GGA-LSDA not responsible for the observed enhanced value of the electronic specific heat coefficient γ (cf. Ref. 35 and our specific heat results in section III D).

FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of the interatomic dis- tances d(Cr-As) [d(Cr/Fe-As)] and d(As-As) in BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2. Also shown are the two bond angles ∠1(As-Cr- As) (blue) and ∠2(As-Cr-As) (red) in the CrAs4 tetrahedron of BaCr2As2 and the corresponding angles for BaCrFeAs2. FIG. 5. Fermi surface of BaCr2As2.

The evolution of the DOS with increasing Coulomb about 300K and the N´eel temperature TN = 580(10)K parameter U in the LDA+U calculation is given in Figure as shown in Fig. 4. Above TN finally d(As-As) seems to 6. Note that the unoccupied minority states of one of the show a slight increase up to 750K. The bond length d(Cr- Cr atoms correspond to the unoccupied majority states As) only shows a slight increase from 2 K up to 750 K, of the other, and vice versa for the occupied states due to but a weak anomaly is observed near TN. On the other the anti-symmetric spin densities of an antiferromagnet. hand in BaCrFeAs2 both, d(As-As) and d(Cr-As), only The increased U results in an increase of the magnetic show a slight increase in the temperature range from 2K moment at the Cr atoms (cf. Table II). Their values are and 275 K without anomalies, indicating that magnetic in the range 2.4-3.5 µB. ordering does not influence the structural properties sig- The “bare” coefficient of the electron specific heat 2 2 −1 −2 nificantly. In Fig. 4 we have also plotted the changes of γ0 = π kB n(ǫF)/3 for BaCr2As2 is ≈ 8 mJ mol K . the two different bond angles ∠1(As-Cr-As) and ∠2(As- For the various calculation schemes the results are also Cr-As) in the CrAs4 (and Cr/FeAs4) tetrahedra, which given in Table II. The inclusion of SO interaction has only form a twodimensional layer in the ab plane. The struc- a weak effect on γ0. For LDA+U, it is found that n(ǫF) tural anomalies accompanying the magnetic transition – and thus γ0 – increases slightly and has a maximum in BaCr2As2 are also reflected in the bond angles. Thus, at U ≈ 1 eV, but then decreases with further increase of the bond angles ∠1(As-Cr-As) and ∠2(As-Cr-As) show a U. Using SPRKKR and the mean field approximation a strong increase and decrease in the magnetically ordered N´eel temperature TN,calc ≈ 880 K can be calculated. 6

10

U = 4 eV twice as high as the one calculated for BaCr2As2. It 8 arises from flat bands around ǫF. A detailed analysis of 6 the DOS reveals that those states are localized at the Fe 4 atoms. In many cases, compounds with such a peaked

2 DOS at ǫF are not stable. 0

10 ] U = 2 eV -1

8

BaCrFeAs afm G 6

2 ) [eV )

4 E (

n 2

1

0

10

0

U = 1 eV [eV] F

8

-1 6 ) ) k (

4 E

-2

2 Density of states states of Density

0

-3

10 Energy Energy

U = 0 eV

-4 8

6

total

4 Cr I M X M 0 2 4 6 8 10

0 0

2 Cr II

Density of states

Electron momentum k

0

-1

n(E) [eV ]

-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4

Energy E - [eV]

F FIG. 7. Electronic structure of BaCrFeAs2 with chemical dis- order between Cr and Fe. Shown is the case with a vanishing FIG. 6. Density of states of BaCr2As2 calculated with magnetic moment at Fe. The DOS is the same in both spin LDA+U. Shown is the total DOS together with the local channels due to the afm order, thus the sum is plotted. DOS at Cr atoms for increasing U.

TABLE II. Spin magnetic moment of the Cr atoms, the DOS The electronic structure and the DOS of the alloy vari- at the Fermi energy n(ǫF), and the coefficient of the electron ant of BaCrFeAs2 are shown in Fig. 7. The result of specific heat γ0 for different calculation schemes for G-type the chemical disorder scattering are strongly broadened 2 2 afm ordered BaCr As . All calculations were performed in- electronic states, in particular close to ǫF. The broaden- cluding spin-orbit interaction (SO). ing causes a reduction of the maximum of the DOS just −1 U mCr n(ǫF) γ0 above ǫF to about 5eV , which is still higher compared −1 −1 −2 method eV µB eV mJ mol K to BaCr2As2. GGA with SO 0 2.4 3.37 7.95 The magnetic properties of ordered and alloyed LDA+U 1 2.8 3.67 8.65 BaCrFeAs are compared in Table III. The moment for 2 3.1 2.45 5.77 2 3 3.3 2.91 6.85 the atomically ordered phase compares well with 2.6 µB 4 3.4 2.85 6.71 reported in Ref. 36. The moments in the ordered case are 5 3.5 1.84 4.35 not completely the same, the vanishing total moment is guaranteed by the polarization of the interstitial and the atoms in the vicinity of the magnetic Cr and Fe atoms. The orbital magnetic moments are very small, in the or- C. Electronic structure of BaCrFeAs2 der of 0.002 µB or 0.06 µB. Interestingly, for the random distribution of Fe and Cr, The electronic structure of the ordered variant of a stable solution is found with vanishing moments at the BaCrFeAs should be a completely compensated half- 2 Fe atoms at the same site. The calculation was started metallic ferromagnet as reported in Reference [36]. The with a starting moment at the Cr atoms (4µ ) but zero peculiarity of this type of magnetism is that the moment B moment at Fe. No magnetic moment was induced dur- of two different types of atoms – here Cr and Fe – com- ing the self consistent cycles. The result is an average pensate each other similar to a antiferromagnet. The moment of 1.38µ for the 2c/2d positions. different symmetry, however, allows that the DOS in the B two spin channels are different. Moreover, a band gap at Also for BaCrFeAs2 the N´eel temperature can be cal- ǫF appears in one of the spin densities similar to a half- culated in the mean field approximation using SPRKKR. metallic ferromagnet. The DOS for the ↑ spin channel The value for the atomically ordered structure is very has a pronounced maximum just above ǫF with a value high, however, a much lower N´eel temperature of about −1 of n(ǫF + δ)=6.92eV (δ ≈ 50 meV). This value is 260 K is obtained for the disordered version. 7

with ThCr2Si2-type structure. It is typical for the some- TABLE III. Magnetic properties of BaCrFeAs2. Tabulated what twodimensional character of the magnetic inter- are the DOS just above ǫF (nmax), the absolute values of the actions and has been treated in detail theoretically for magnetic moments at Cr and Fe species (mCr Fe), and the / BaMn As [8]. For BaCr As the smooth maximum of calculated N´eel temperatures (TN,calc). 2 2 2 2 χ(T ) may be anticipated for temperatures around 900K. A small upturn of χ(T ) in both directions for temper- ordered disordered −1 atures below ≈ 50K suggests the presence of paramag- nmax 6.92 4.99 (eV ) netic impurities, e.g. from point defects. Magnetization mCr 2.74 2.76 (µB) mFe 2.53 0.00 (µB) loops taken at T =1.8 K (Fig. 8 inset) show a very small −4 TN,calc 965 260 (K) fm-like component of < 5 × 10 µB for both field along or perpendicular to the c axis. Also, in measurements of M(T ) at µ0H =0.01 T, a small sharp transition from a fm impurity phase becomes visible at Timp ≈ 76 K. We assign this transition and the fm-like signals to the D. Magnetic and thermal properties, electrical transport structural and helimagnetic ordering transition of CrAs [25]. The ordering temperature of CrAs is known to de- crease dramatically to zero for pressures of 0.7-0.8 GPa [26 and 27]. We speculate that CrAs on the crystal sur- face is strained and its ordering temperature is therefore reduced to Timp.

FIG. 8. of a BaCr2As2 crystal in a field µ0H = 1 T perpendicular (blue diamonds) and paral- lel (red circles) to the crystallographic c axis. Minor adjust- ments of the magnetometer oven data sets (T > 400 K) were made to match with the data below 400 K. The inset shows FIG. 9. Magnetic susceptibility of the BaCrFeAs2 sintered the magnetic moment from an isothermal magnetization loop sample used for the other measurements (black circles) in measured at a temperature T = 1.8 K. a field µ0H = 1 T. For comparison, the susceptibility of a BaCrFeAs2 crystal (diamonds) with field perpendicular and − parallel to the c axis is shown (shifted up by 5 × 10 4 emu The temperature dependence of the magnetic suscep- mol−1). The crystal has a lower N´eel temperature. The inset tibility, χ = M/H, at µ0H = 1T of a BaCr2As2 crys- shows the magnetization loop at T = 2.0K tal platelet (ab plane) was measured with the magnetic field parallel and perpendicular to the c axis (Fig. 8). The magnetic susceptibility of sintered BaCrFeAs2 The small difference between the directions above 600 K (Fig. 9) displays a broadened cusp at TN ≈ 269(2)K suggests a rather weak anisotropy in the paramagnetic (midpoint of step in d(χT )/dT ), but there is only a slight regime. However, no Curie-Weiss behavior could be ob- decrease of the χ(T ) curve below this temperature. In- served up to T = 800K. For H k c a clear kink is vis- stead, with decreasing temperature the susceptibility in- ible, indicating the afm ordering of the Cr sub-lattice creases again, indicating a strong paramagnetic contribu- at TN = 575(10)K, as determined from the peak in the tion following a Curie law. Above the N´eel temperature derivative d(χT )/dT . The decrease of χ(T ) for H k c to- (range 300-400K) the data are well fitted by a Curie- wards low temperatures is much stronger than for H ⊥ c, Weiss law with effective moment µeff =3.70 µB and Weiss eventually suggesting an afm order with magnetic mo- temperature θP = −273K. The BaCrFeAs2 crystal shows ments aligned along the c axis. The behavior of χ(T ) a similar cusp, however at ≈ 225K. The lower TN of the and the ordering temperature is very similar to that of single crystal is probably due to a slightly lower Fe con- BaMn2As2 [8]. The nearly isotropic but non-Curie-Weiss tent compared to the sinter sample. The decrease of χ(T ) behavior above TN is observed for several afm compounds is more pronounced for H k c, suggesting an afm ordered 8 structure with the magnetic moments lying in the crys- ρ(T ) increase very slightly (by ≈ 0.1% of ρ0). The mag- tallographic c direction. The paramagnetic contribution netoresistance (MR, Fig. 10 inset) is very small and pos- in the magnetically ordered state of BaCrFeAs2 is dis- itive for high temperatures. Surprisingly, for T = 2.0K cussed in connection with the M¨ossbauer results (Sec. it is negative and quite strong (-1.7 % at µ0H = 9 T). III F). This might indicate the damping of an additional scat- tering mechanism at very low temperatures compared to the TN. The origin of both the upturn of ρ(T ) below 13 K and of the negative MR might be due to a Kondo-hole effect. Non-magnetic atoms replacing magnetic Cr in the afm ordered lattice can give rise to a Kondo-like upturn of resistivity at low temperatures. This scattering is weak- ened by the application of a magnetic field resulting in a negative MR proportional to the field. The Hall resistiv- ity curves ρab(H) are linear, the Hall constants are posi- tive and do almost not vary with temperature. This ob- servation is consistent with the hole pocket around the Γ point (cf. Fig. 5). Within a one-band model the Hall con- 22 −3 stant corresponds to a hole density nh ≈ 1.5 × 10 cm 2 −1 −1 and low mobility (bh = 11cm V s at T = 2 K). For polycrystalline BaCrFeAs2 (Fig. 10) as well as for a single crystal (not shown) the electrical resistivity is about five time higher. Interestingly, it displays only FIG. 10. Electrical resistivity of a BaCr2As2 crystal mea- sured in the crystallographic ab plane (red circles) and of a a weak temperature dependence and increases continu- sintered sample of BaCrFeAs2 (blue diamonds) in zero mag- ously with decreasing temperature. Similar to BaCr2As2 netic field. The resistivity curves in µ0H = 9 T (lines) almost there is an upturn below a certain temperature (here, coincide with the zero-field data. The inset shows the magne- ≈ 40 K). The absence of a typical metallic resistivity be- toresistance 100×(ρ−ρ0)/ρ0 as function of field for BaCr2As2 havior is probably due to scattering of charge carriers on measured at T = 2.0 and 300 K. the disordered Cr/Fe species of the 4d Wyckoff site. The order of magnitude suggests however that BaCrFeAs2 is still a metal. Nominally isoelectronic BaMn2As2 crys- tals grown in MnAs flux show an about 100 times higher resistivity [6]. The magnetoresistance of BaCrFeAs2 is small (< 0.15 %) for all temperatures, indicating that magnetic scattering due to the atomic Cr/Fe disorder is unimportant. Also for BaCrFeAs2 the Hall isotherms ρxy(H) are linear, however Hall constants are negative and vary with temperature. They correspond to electron 21 −3 densities ne = 8.3 × 10 cm at T = 300K and only 21 −3 2 −1 −1 1.5 × 10 cm at 2 K with be = 6cm V s . The specific heat, cp(T ), of the two compounds is pre- sented in Fig. 11. For BaCr2As2 no anomalies from transitions are visible up to 320 K. However, cp(T ) for BaCrFeAs2 is larger than that of BaCr2As2 in the cov- ered temperature range which might also be due to the Cr/Fe disorder. A very small steplike anomaly can be seen at ≈ 260 K (barely standing out of the noise). The FIG. 11. Molar specific heat c (T ) of a BaCr2As2 single crys- p transition temperature is in agreement with our magne- tal (red circles) and of polycrystalline sintered BaCrFeAs2 2 tization and neutron diffraction data (see Section III E). (blue diamonds). Inset: cp/T vs. T representation for low temperatures. Zero-field data (dark symbols and line) and The small entropy change connected with this magnetic data in a magnetic field µ0H = 9 T (light symbols) are shown. ordering is due to the low ordered moments of Cr/Fe and the predominantly itinerant character of the mag-

The electrical resistivity, ρ(T ), of the BaCr2As2 crystal netic system. The Dulong-Petit limit cp = 3nR (R = measured for current in the ab plane (Fig. 10) increases molar gas constant, n = number of atoms) is reached by almost linearly with temperature and indicates metallic both compounds at around room temperature. behavior of the compound (ρ300 K = 136 µΩ cm). The At low temperatures the specific heats (see Fig. 11 in- 3 5 residual resistance ratio RRR ≈ 3.8 indicates a fair qual- set) are well described by cp(T )= γT + βT + δT where ity of the specimen and the residual resistance is already γ is the coefficient of the linear term γT (usually assigned reached at ≈ 13 K. Interestingly, below this temperature to conduction electrons) and βT 3 and δT 5 are the first 9 two terms due to the harmonic theory of lattice specific shown that magnetic intensities appear at the positions heat. For BaCr2As2 (BaCrFeAs2) least-squares fits in of nuclear Bragg reflections indicating a magnetic struc- the range 1.9–7 K result in γ = 18.8 (64.9) mJ mol−1 ture, which can be described with the propagation vector −1 −1 −4 k t 1 1 1 K , β = 0.51 (0.56) mJ mol K corresponding to = 0. This shows that the translation = ( 2 , 2 , 2 ) as- an initial Debye temperature of 268 (259)K, and δ =0.6 sociated with the I cell is not lost. In Figure 2 it can be −1 −6 (0.0) µJ mol K . The γ value obtained for BaCr2As2 seen that the strongest magnetic intensity is observed at is close to the value deduced by Singh et al. [35], how- 2θ = 27.4◦, which is the position of the Bragg reflection ever the linear term of BaCrFeAs2 is very large. The γ 101. Strong intensity could be generated at this position value for BaCrFeAs2 is confirmed through measurements using a magnetic structure model, where the chromium 1 1 on the single crystal for which we show the susceptibility atoms in the Wyckoff positions 4d, located at (0, 2 , 4 ) in Fig. 9. The lattice properties (Debye temperatures) 1 1 and ( 2 ,0, 4 ), are coupled antiparallel. Due to the I cen- of the two compounds are similar, as expected from the t 1 1 1 tering the operation = ( 2 , 2 , 2 ) does not change the small atomic mass difference of Cr and Fe. Also, afm direction of the spin. Therefore one finds the spin se- spin waves do not play a role due to the high N´eel tem- 1 1 quence +−+− for the Cr atoms in the positions (0, 2 , 4 ), peratures. ( 1 , 0, 1 ), ( 1 , 0, 3 ), and (0, 1 , 3 ). The linear specific heat contribution is insensitive to 2 4 2 4 2 4 Using this structure model the magnetic structure magnetic fields (cf. Fig. 11 inset). For BaCr As in a 2 2 could be successfully refined, when the magnetic mo- field µ H = 9 T the linear coefficient γ is not changed at 0 ments are aligned parallel to the c axis. The same type all. For BaCrFeAs the specific heat increases slightly in 2 of magnetic ordering is found for BaMn As and also for µ H = 9T for T < 5 K (by maximally 1.8 % at 3.3 K), 2 2 0 the Cr sublattice in EuCr As [38]. Assuming an ad- which might be due to a Schottky-type anomaly due to 2 2 ditional magnetic component within the ab plane, mag- minor impurities. Thus, the enhanced γ values should ei- netic intensity should appear at the position of the re- ther not be due to spin fluctuations at all or the spin fluc- flection 002. Magnetic intensity could not be easily de- tuations are of too high in energy. Especially BaCr As 2 2 termined from the difference patterns collected at 2 and has a very high N´eel temperature and the fluctuations 750 K, in the fully ordered and the paramagnetic state, might not be quenchable by such a small field. because the strong structural changes lead to a change of the nuclear intensity of the reflection 002. Therefore E. Magnetic structures we have refined simultaneously the crystal and the mag- netic structure at 2 K. The calculated nuclear intensity of the 002 reflection is even slightly larger than the ob- served one. This clearly indicates the absence of an ad- ditional magnetic component within the ab plane, i. e. the absence of any spin canting to the c axis. From the data set collected at 2K on instrument E9 we fi- nally found for the Cr atoms a magnetic moment of µexp = 1.88(2)µB resulting in a residual RM = 0.0268 [defined as RM = (Σ||Iobs| − |Icalc||)/Σ|Iobs|]. From the data set collected on instrument E2 the magnetic mo- ment µexp = 1.80(2)µB was found to be slightly smaller (residual RM = 0.118). It has to be mentioned that the moment value determined from the E9 data is more re- liable, since the overall scale factor could be determined with higher accuracy (a much larger number of nuclear Bragg reflections was available). From the data collected on E2, E6, and E9 we are able to determine the tempera- ture dependence of the magnetic moment up to the N´eel temperature TN = 580(10)K (see Figure 12). The results FIG. 12. Temperature dependence of the magnetic moments from the neutron diffraction experiments compare well per transition-metal atom in BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2 as with those from magnetization data of the BaCr2As2 sin- obtained from powder neutron diffraction data (instruments gle crystal (Fig. 8). The experimental magnetic Cr mo- E2, E6, and E9). Magnetic intensity of Bragg reflections ments at 2 K compare reasonably well with the values ob- disappears at the N´eel temperatures TN = 580(10) K and tained from our (cf. Table II and previous [35] electronic TN = 265(5) K respectively. structure calculations. The experimental Cr moment is even slightly smaller than the calculated moments. This In order to investigate the magnetic structure of shows that electronic correlation effects reflected in the BaCr2As2 we have collected a powder neutron pattern parameter U of the LDA+U calculations do not play a at 2K. In comparison to the data collected at 750K, role as increasing U lead to larger Cr magnetic moments. well above the N´eel temperature TN = 580K, it was Accordingly we have determined the magnetic struc- 10 ture of BaCrFeAs2. As it can be seen in Figure 2 the ing temperature. Nevertheless the local electronic struc- strongest magnetic intensity could also be observed at ture is quite similar in the two compounds. Most remark- the position of the reflection 101. The magnetic intensi- ably, the peak Bhf of about 5T in BaCrFeAs2 is nearly ties of BaCrFeAs2 are found to be much weaker than the same as the Bhf in the magnetically ordered phases those in BaCr2As2 indicating that the averaged mag- of BaFe2As2 [50] and LaOFeAs [51]. From the neutron netic moments of the Cr and Fe atoms are strongly re- diffraction study we obtained an average magnetic mo- duced. A moment µexp = 1.09(3)µB was refined result- ment of 1.09 µB per magnetic ion. Assuming that the Cr ing in a residual RM = 0.068. The N´eel temperature moment is the same as in BaCr2As2 (1.8 µB) we estimate TN = 265(5)K compares well with our magnetic suscep- the iron moment as 0.4 µB. tibility data (Fig. 9). It has been pointed out that a direct estimation of

Fe moments from Bhf is questionable due to spin-orbit

100 induced contributions to Bhf in the iron pnictides [52]. Nevertheless, a small iron moment is in qualitative agree-

292 K ment with the small Bhf for BaCrFeAs2. A similarly BaCrFeAs

96 2 small iron moment of 0.4 µB was reported for LaOFeAs [53], whereas a larger moment of 0.9 µB was derived for 100 BaFe2As2 [16]. The spectra of BaCrFeAs2 are, how- ever, much less resolved than those of BaFe2As2 and 200 K

LaOFeAs which reflects the Fe-Cr disorder in the present material giving rise to a broad Bhf distribution. Both, 96 neutron diffraction and M¨ossbauer data confirm that Fe 100 and Cr atoms are disordered, while some previous elec- tronic structure calculations assumed an ordered arrange- 100 K

98 ment [6 and 36]. A large ordered Fe moment of 2.5–2.6 µB predicted from the electronic structure calculations for atomically ordered BaCrFeAs2 (Ref. 36 and Table 100 III) is incompatible with the neutron diffraction and the

50 K M¨ossbauer data.

98 Relative Transmission (%)

0.08 BaCrFeAs

2 100

T = 5 K, B = 5.4 T

hf

99 T = 50 K, B = 3.3 T 5 K

hf

0.06

T = 100 K, B = 2.4 T

hf

98

0.04

-4 -2 0 2 4

Velocity (mm/s) Probability

0.02 FIG. 13. M¨ossbauer spectra of BaCrFeAs2 at the indicated temperatures. Dots correspond to the experimental data, solid lines to the best fits. 0.00

0 4 8 12

B (T)

hf F. M¨ossbauer spectroscopy on BaCrFeAs2 FIG. 14. Hyperfine field distributions in the low-temperature 57 Representative Fe M¨ossbauer spectra of BaCrFeAs2 range which were extracted from M¨ossbauer spectra of are shown in Figure 13. The room temperature spec- BaCrFeAs2. The dashed lines indicate the positions of the trum appears as a broadened line which can be fitted peak hyperfine fields given in the Figure. by a quadrupole doublet with an isomer shift IS of 0.44 mm s−1 and a quadrupole splitting QS of 0.13 mm s−1. Indications for an unusual behavior of the Fe moments By contrast, the spectrum at 5K features a complex is obtained from the temperature dependence of Bhf . broad pattern which evidences the presence of magnetic With increasing temperature a pronounced decrease in hyperfine splitting. The spectrum was fitted by assum- hyperfine splitting is apparent even in the temperature ing a distribution of hyperfine fields, yielding IS = 0.59 region 5-100K (Figure 13), which is unexpected as the −1 mm s and a peak hyperfine field Bhf =5.4 T. The iso- N´eel temperature is much higher (265 K). At 100 K the mer shifts are slightly larger than those of BaFe2As2 [50] Bhf distribution even extends down to 0 T (Figure 14) which adopts the SDW phase below the magnetic order- indicating that a fraction of the iron atoms is already 11 non-magnetic. These observations are in contrast to the BaCrFeAs2 still adopts this G-type afm structure but behavior of BaFe2As2 where in this temperature range the ordering temperature is less than half of that of only a minor reduction of Bhf was observed although BaCr2As2. The small average moment µCr/Fe ≈ 1.1 µB in TN is considerably smaller (≈ 140 K) [50]. The strong connection with the small hyperfine field from M¨ossbauer decrease of the peak Bhf from 5.4 T at 5 K to 2.4 T at spectra is in agreement with the results of our calcula- 100K is also in sharp contrast to the temperature de- tions for atomically disordered BaCrFeAs2 and an Fe mo- pendence of the total magnetic moments derived from ment µFe ∼ 0. The N´eel temperature calculated within neutron diffraction (Figure 12). mean-field approximation is in good agreement with the A possible scenario is that the Fe moments do not par- experimental value (260 K and 265 K, respectively). Also ticipate in the G-type afm structure and rather freeze the average Cr/Fe moment is in fair agreement with the in the low temperature range which is consistent with calculation (2.76 µB, distributed on two atoms). These the fact that no anomaly is apparent in the temperature findings, together with an anomalous temperature de- dependence of the moments between 2 and 100 K. The pendence of the hyperfine field, indicate that the small formation of the G-type afm order then is still driven by Fe moments are not incorporated into the G-type afm or- the large Cr moments. Further on, the upturn in the der. Thus it may be conjectured that Fe favors the stripe- susceptibility χ(T ) below TN = 265 K (Fig. 9), which type and Cr the checkerboard-type spin fluctuations, the is in contrast to the behavior of BaCr2As2, is a further latter being considered to be detrimental to superconduc- indication that the iron moments are at least partially tivity [4]. In case of electron pairing mediated by spin- disordered. As demonstrated above electronic structure fluctuations this finding would be in agreement with the calculations of atomically disordered BaCrFeAs2 start- fact that so far no superconductivity was observed for ing with zero Fe moment result in a stable solution with BaCr2As2 or Cr-substituted BaFe2As2. Similarly, no su- µFe ∼ 0 and µCr = 2.76 µB. The resulting average mo- perconductivity was found in Mn-substituted BaFe2As2, ment of 1.38 µB per formula unit of BaCrFeAs2 is not where the pure Mn compound BaMn2As2 adopts a sta- too far from the experimental moment of 1.09 µB. The ble G-type afm order as well. Accordingly not only the mismatch of the Fe moments with G-type antiferromag- doping level but also the type of spin fluctuations has netism explains why TN in Fe-substituted BaCr2As2 de- to be considered for predictions of new superconducting creases drastically from 580K in the parent compound compositions. to ≈ 50K for an iron content of about 70% where finally Both BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2 are metals. The linear the G-type order becomes unstable and is replaced by the specific heat (Sommerfeld) coefficients γ are much larger SDW structure [34]. At higher temperature the hyperfine than expected from band theory, by a factor of 2.4 for splitting further decreases and for T ≥ 200 K essentially BaCr2As2 and a huge factor of 5.5 for BaCrFeAs2. The a broad unstructured line is found. In this temperature discrepancies for both compounds cannot be resolved by range the Fe atoms are possibly polarized by the Cr mo- reasonable strengths of correlations. However it seems ments. Above 260 K only minor changes in line broaden- that for BaCrFeAs2 the disorder of the magnetic Cr and ing occur which compares well with TN = 265 K obtained Fe atoms to some extent additionally boosts the γ value. from neutron diffraction and susceptibility data. Our findings may be compared with results for the bet- ter investigated Mn 122 system. In contrast to BaCr2As2 5 BaMn2As2 is semiconducting [5–9]. The nominal 3d IV. CONCLUSIONS compound has a N´eel temperature which is slightly higher than that of BaCr2As2. It is possible to induce We have studied in detail the structural, electronic, a metallic state in BaMn2As2 by application of pressure and magnetic properties of BaCr2As2 and BaCrFeAs2. [54] or by hole-doping with as little as 1.6 % of K [55]. − BaCr2As2 as well as LaOCrAs [31 and 32] have been In this metallic state Ba1 xKxMn2As2 is still G-type or- discussed recently in connection with the Mott scenario dered [56] and is thus similar to BaCr2As2. But there is (see Section I) of transition-metal arsenide supercon- one important difference, the Sommerfeld γ in the metal- −1 −1 ductivity. Our powder neutron diffraction studies ver- lic Mn system is much smaller (8.4 mJ mol K for ify that BaCr2As2 adopts the theoretically predicted G- x = 0.05 [55]) than in BaCr2As2. This suggests that type afm order at TN = 580K and an ordered moment electronic correlations are weak in the BaMn2As2 mate- µCr = 1.9 µB at 2K. Evidence for magneto-structural rials. A recent photoemission (ARPES) study corrobo- coupling effects was found and it remains to be clari- rates that there is almost no band renormalization with fied whether this reflects some type of electronic instabil- respect to the DFT-based band structure in BaMn2As2 ity. The experimental magnetic Cr moment agrees well [9]. An ARPES study on BaCr2As2 would therefore be with LDA electronic structure calculations whereas in- highly welcome in order to shed more light on the de- corporation of electron correlation within the LDA+U velopment of electronic correlations in the 122 family of scheme leads to Cr moments which are too high. TN transition-metal arsenides. is 1/3 lower than the ordering temperature calculated For Ba1−xKxMn2As2 the N´eel temperature and the within mean-field approximation, underlining the some- ordered Mn moment remain almost constant up to high what twodimensional character of the magnetic system. substitution levels (x ≤ 0.4) [56]. In contrast, in 12 the substitution series BaFe2−xMnxAs2 for a low Mn to possibly generate superconductivity in Mn or Cr-based substitution level x = 0.15 a clear competition be- 122 or 1111-type arsenides is the application of high pres- tween stripe-type and checkerboard-type spin fluctua- sure. With high pressure, in transition-metal arsenides tions could be observed by inelastic neutron scattering structural instabilities come into play. We have now un- [57], quite similar to the BaCr2−xFexAs2 series [34]. For dertaken a structural and electrical transport study on BaFe2−xMnxAs2 a miscibility gap prevents the synthesis one of our BaCr2As2 crystals under high pressure, the of single-phase material for Mn contents x> 0.24 [58]. results of which will be reported elsewhere [59]. 5 Although both modified BaMn2As2-based (3d ) mate- rials [54–56] as well as BaCr2As2 are afm-ordered metals, until now there are no ways known to obtain supercon- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ductors based on these materials. The partial substitu- tion of Ba by K in BaCr2As2 (hole doping) showed to be We thank Ralf Koban for assistence and Igor Verem- unsuccessful, but surprisingly resulted in the discovery chuk for spark plasma sintering of a sample. MG ac- of superconducting K2Cr3As3 [28 and 29]. Another way knowledges support of nsf-dmr 1507252 grant.

1 E. Bascones, B. Valenzuela, and M. J. Calder´on, 11 S. Dong, W. Li, X. Huang, and E. Dagotto, First Magnetic interactions in iron superconductors: A re- principles study of the magnetic properties of LaOM- view, Comptes Rendus Phys. 17, 36 (2016), URL nAs, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 17D723 (2014), URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2015.05.004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867757. 2 P. Dai, Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron- 12 P. Dai, J. Hu, and E. Dagotto, Magnetism and based superconductors, Rev. Modern Phys. 87, 855 (2015), its microscopic origin in iron-based high-temperature URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.855. superconductors, Nature Phys. 8, 709 (2012), URL 3 Q. Si, R. Yu, and E. Abrahams, High tempera- https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2438. ture superconductivity in iron pnictides and chalco- 13 N. Mannella, The magnetic moment enigma in genides, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 16017 (2016), URL Fe-based high temperature superconductors, J. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.17. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 473202 (2014), URL 4 R. M. Fernandes and A. J. Millis, Suppression of super- https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/47/473202. conductivity by N´eel-type magnetic fluctuations in the 14 S. Backes, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valenti, Micro- iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 117004 (2013), URL scopic nature of correlations in multiorbital AFe2As2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.117004. (A = K, Rb, Cs): Hund’s coupling versus Coulomb 5 J. An, A. S. Sefat, D. J. Singh, and M.-H. Du, repulsion, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195128 (2015), URL Electronic structure and magnetism in BaMn2As2 and https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195128. 15 BaMn2Sb2, Phys. Rev. B 79, 075120 (2009), URL M. Rotter, M. Tegel, D. Johrendt, I. Schellen- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.075120. berg, W. Hermes, and R. P¨ottgen, Spin-density- 6 Y. Singh, A. Ellern, and D. C. Johnston, Magnetic, trans- wave anomaly at 140 K in the ternary iron arsenide port, and thermal properties of single crystals of the lay- BaFe2As2, Phys. Rev. B 78, 020503 (2008), URL ered arsenide BaMn2As2, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094519 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.020503. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094519. 16 Q. Huang, Y. Qiu, W. Bao, M. A. Green, J. W. 7 Y. Singh, M. A. Green, Q. Huang, A. Kreyssig, R. J. Lynn, Y. C. Gasparovic, T. Wu, G. Wu, and X. H. McQueeney, D. C. Johnston, and A. I. Goldman, Mag- Chen, Neutron-diffraction measurements of magnetic or- netic order in BaMn2As2 from neutron diffraction mea- der and a structural transition in the parent BaFe2As2 surements, Phys. Rev. B 80, 100403 (2009), URL compound of FeAs-based high-temperature supercon- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.100403. ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 257003 (2008), URL 8 D. C. Johnston, R. J. McQueeney, B. Lake, A. Ho- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.257003. necker, M. E. Zhitomirsky, R. Nath, Y. Furukawa, V. P. 17 G.-F. Chen, Z. Li, G. Li, W.-Z. Hu, J. Dong, J. Zhou, Antropov, and Y. Singh, Magnetic exchange interac- X.-D. Zhang, P. Zheng, N.-L. Wang, and J.-L. Luo, Su- tions in BaMn2As2: A case study of the J1 − J2 − Jc perconductivity in hole-doped (Sr1−xKx)Fe2As2, Chinese Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094445 (2011), URL Phys. Lett. 25, 3403 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094445. 18 K. Sasmal, B. Lv, B. Lorenz, A. M. Guloy, 9 W.-L. Zhang et al., Angle-resolved photoemission ob- F. Chen, Y.-Y. Xue, and C.-W. Chu, Supercon- servation of Mn-pnictide hybridization and negligi- ducting Fe-based compounds (A1−xSrxFe2As2 with ble band structure renormalization in BaMn2As2 and A = K and Cs with transition temperatures up to BaMn2Sb2, Phys. Rev. B 94, 155155 (2016), URL 37 K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107007 (2008), URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155155. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.107007. 10 A. Beleanu et al., Large resistivity change and phase tran- 19 P. L. Alireza, Y. T. C. Ko, J. Gillett, C. M. Petrone, J. M. sition in the antiferromagnetic semiconductors LiMnAs Cole, G. G. Lonzarich, and S. E. Sebastian, Superconduc- and LaOMnAs, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184429 (2013), URL tivity up to 29 K in SrFe2As2 and BaFe2As2 at high pres- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.184429. sures, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 012208 (2008), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/1/012208. 13

20 A. S. Sefat, R. Jin, M. A. McGuire, B. C. 34 K. Marty, A. D. Christianson, C. H. Wang, M. Matsuda, Sales, D. J. Singh, and D. Mandrus, Supercon- H. Cao, L. H. VanBebber, J. L. Zarestky, D. J. Singh, A. S. ductivity at 22 K in Co-doped BaFe2As2 crys- Sefat, and M. D. Lumsden, Competing magnetic ground tals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 117004 (2008), URL states in nonsuperconducting Ba(Fe1−xCrx)2As2 as seen https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.117004. via neutron diffraction, Phys. Rev. B 83, 060509 (2011), 21 A. Leithe-Jasper, W. Schnelle, C. Geibel, and URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.060509. 35 H. Rosner, Superconducting state in SrFe2−xCoxAs2 D. J. Singh, A. S. Sefat, M. A. McGuire, B. C. by internal doping of the iron arsenide lay- Sales, D. Mandrus, L. H. VanBebber, and V. Kep- ers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 207004 (2008), URL pens, Itinerant in BaCr2As2: Ex- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.207004. perimental characterization and electronic structure cal- 22 W. Schnelle, A. Leithe-Jasper, R. Gumeniuk, culations, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094429R (2009), URL U. Burkhardt, D. Kasinathan, and H. Rosner, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094429. 36 Substitution-induced superconductivity in SrFe2−xRuxAs2 S.-J. Hu and X. Hu, Half-metallic antiferromagnet (0 ≤ x ≤ 2), Phys. Rev. B 79, 214516 (2009), URL BaCrFeAs2, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 11614 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.214516. 37 U. B. Paramanik, R. Prasad, C. Geibel, and Z. Hos- 23 D. Kasinathan, A. Ormeci, K. Koch, U. Burkhardt, sain, Itinerant and local-moment magnetism in EuCr2As2 W. Schnelle, A. Leithe-Jasper, and H. Rosner, AFe2As2 single crystals, Phys. Rev. B 89, 144423 (2014), URL (A= Ca, Sr, Ba, Eu) and SrFe2−xTMxAs2 (TM = Mn, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.144423. Co, Ni): crystal structure, charge doping, magnetism and 38 S. Nandi, Y. Xiao, N. Qureshi, U. B. Paramanik, W. T. superconductivity, New J. Phys. 11, 025023 (2009), URL Jin, Y. Su, B. Ouladdiaf, Z. Hossain, and T. Br¨uckel, Mag- https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/2/025023. netic structures of the Eu and Cr moments in EuCr2As2: 24 O. Moze, M. Hofmann, J. M. Cadogan, K. H. J. Neutron diffraction study, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094411 (2016), Buschow, and D. H. Ryan, Magnetic order in URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.094411. 39 RCr2Si2 intermetallics, Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens. J. Rodr´ıguez-Carvajal, Recent advances in magnetic struc- Matter and Complex Systems 36, 511 (2003), URL ture determination by neutron powder diffraction, Physica https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00006-4. B: Condens. Matter 192, 55 (1993). 25 H. Boller and A. Kallel, First order crystallographic and 40 V. F. Sears, in International Tables for Crystallography, magnetic in CrAs, Solid State Commun. edited by A. J. C. Wilson (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 9, 1699 (1971). Dordrecht/Boston/London,, 1995), vol. C, p. 383. 26 W. Wu, J. Cheng, K. Matsubayashi, P. Kong, F. Lin, 41 P. J. Brown, in International Tables for Crystallography, C. Jin, N. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Luo, Super- edited by A. J. C. Wilson (Kluwer Academic Publishers, conductivity in the vicinity of antiferromagnetic or- Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1995), vol. C, p.391. der in CrAs, Nature Commun. 5, 5508 (2014), URL 42 MossWinn 4.0. http://mosswinn.com. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6508. 43 P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, P. Sorantin, and S. B. Trickey, 27 H. Kotegawa, S. Nakahara, H. Tou, and H. Sugawara, Comp. Phys. Comm. 59, 399 (1999). Superconductivity of 2.2 K under pressure in helimag- 44 K. Schwarz and P. Blaha, Comput. Mater. Sci. 28, 259 net CrAs, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 83, 093702 (2014), URL (2003). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.83.093702. 45 P. Blaha, K. Schwarz, G. K. H. Madsen, D. Kvasnicka, 28 J.-K. Bao, J.-Y. Liu, C.-W. Ma, Z.-H. Meng, Z.- and J. Luitz, WIEN2k, an augmented plane wave + lo- T. Tang, Y.-L. Sun, H.-F. Zhai, H. Jiang, H. Bai, cal orbitals program for calculating crystal roperties – re- C.-M. Feng, Z.-A. Xu, and G.-H. Cao, Superconduc- vised edition 14.2 (Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universitaet tivity in quasi-one-dimensional K2Cr3As3 with signifi- Wien, Wien, Austria, 2014). cant electron correlations, PRX 5, 011013 (2015), URL 46 H. Ebert, in Electronic Structure and Physical Properties of https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011013. Solids. The Use of the LMTO Method, edited by H. Dreysse 29 G.-H. Cao, J.-K. Bao, Z.-T. Tang, Y. Liu, and H. Jiang, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999), vol. 535 of Lec- Peculiar properties of Cr3As3-chain-based superconductors ture Notes in Physics, p. 191. (2016), arXiv:1609.09635. 47 H. Ebert, D. K¨odderitzsch, and J. Minar, Calcu- 30 H. Ishida and A. Liebsch, Fermi-liquid, non-Fermi- lating condensed matter properties using the KKR- liquid, and Mott phases in iron pnictides and Green’s function method recent developments and ap- cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 81, 054513 (2010), URL plications, Rep. Prog. Phys 74, 096501 (2011), URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.054513. http://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/74/i=9/a=096501. 31 M. Edelmann, G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, and 48 J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzer- L. de’Medici, Chromium analogues of iron-based super- hof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996), URL conductors (2016), arXiv:1610.10054. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. 32 J. M. Pizarro, M. J. Calderson, J. Liu, M. M. noz, and 49 M. Pfisterer and G. Nagorsen, Bindungsverh¨altnisse und E. Bascones, Strong correlations and the search for high- magnetische Eigenschaften tern¨arer Arsenide ET2As2, Z. Tc superconductivity in chromium pnictides and chalco- Naturforsch. B 35b, 703 (1980). genides (2016), arXiv:1610.09560. 50 A. B lachowski, K. Ruebenbauer, J. Zukrowski,˙ K. Rogacki, 33 A. S. Sefat, D. J. Singh, L. H. VanBebber, Z. Bukowski, and J. Karpinski, Shape of Y. Mozharivskyj, M. A. McGuire, R. Jin, B. C. versus temperature in AFe2As2 (A = Ca, Ba, Eu): A Sales, V. Keppens, and D. Mandrus, Absence of M¨ossbauer study, Phys. Rev. B 83, 134410 (2011), URL superconductivity in hole-doped BaFe2−xCrxAs2 sin- https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.134410. gle crystals, Phys. Rev. B 79, 224524 (2009), URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.224524. 14

51 M. A. McGuire, A. D. Christianson, A. S. Sefat, B. C. 55 A. Pandey, R. S. Dhaka, J. Lamsal, Y. Lee, V. K. Sales, M. D. Lumsden, R. Jin, E. A. Payzant, D. Man- Anand, A. Kreyssig, T. W. Heitmann, R. J. McQueeney, drus, Y. Luan, V. Keppens, V. Varadarajan, J. W. Brill, A. I. Goldman, B. N. Harmon, A. Kaminski, and D. C. R. P. Hermann, M. T. Sougrati, F. Grandjean, and G. J. Johnston, Ba1−xKxMn2As2: An antiferromagnetic local- Long, Phase transitions in LaFeAsO: Structural, mag- moment metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087005 (2012), URL netic, elastic, and transport properties, heat capacity and https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.087005. M¨ossbauer spectra, Phys. Rev. B 78, 094517 (2008), URL 56 J. Lamsal, G. S. Tucker, T. W. Heitmann, A. Kreyssig, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.094517. A. Jesche, A. Pandey, W. Tian, R. J. McQueeney, 52 G. Derondeau, J. Min´ar, and H. Ebert, Hyperfine fields D. C. Johnston, and A. I. Goldman, Persis- in the BaFe2As2 family and their relation to the mag- tence of local-moment antiferromagnetic order in netic moment, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214508 (2016), URL Ba1−xKxMn2As2, Phys. Rev. B 87, 144418 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.214508. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.144418. 53 C. de la Cruz, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, J. Li, W. Rat- 57 G. S. Tucker, D. K. Pratt, M. G. Kim, S. Ran, A. Thaler, cliff II, J. L. Zarestky, H. A. Mook, G. F. Chen, G. E. Granroth, K. Marty, W. Tian, J. L. Zarestky, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang, and P. Dai, Magnetic or- M. D. Lumsden, S. L. Bud’ko, P. C. Canfield, A. Kreyssig, der close to superconductivity in the iron-based layered A. I. Goldman, and R. J. McQueeney, Competition be- LaO1−xFxFeAs systems, Nature 453, 899 (2008), URL tween stripe and checkerboard magnetic instabilities in https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07057. Mn-doped BaFe2As2, Phys. Rev. B 86, 020503(R) (2012), 54 A. T. Satya, A. Mani, A. Arulraj, N. V. Chan- URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.020503. dra Shekar, K. Vinod, C. S. Sundar, and 58 A. Pandey, V. K. Anand, and D. C. Johnston, A. Bharathi, Pressure-induced metallization of Large miscibility gap in the Ba(MnxFe1−x)2As2 BaMn2As2, Phys. Rev. B 84, 180515(R) (2011), URL system, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014405 (2011), URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180515. https://doi.org/10.1103/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.014405. 59 S. Medvedev et al., unpublished.