Study Guide for Testing to Technical Sergeant

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Study Guide for Testing to Technical Sergeant Study Guide for Testing to Technical Sergeant 1 October 2019 Source: Air Force Handbook 1 AETC Studies & Analysis Squadron Airman Advancement JBSA-Randolph AFB 1 TECHNCIAL SERGEANT STUDY GUIDE AIRMAN DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING CHART Air Force Handbook 1, Airman (1 October 2019) The primary purposes of the Staff Sergeant Study Guide’s Airman Development and Testing Chart (ADTC) are: 1) to identify Air Force testable content for promotion fitness examination (PFE) testing; 2) enable Airmen to organize and prioritize individual study time based on identified testable content; and, 3) provide all Airmen a force development construct aligned with Air Force institutional competencies. The ADTC is an outline of testable subject matter content drawn from AFH 1, specific for E-6 PFE testing purposes. Testable content comprehension levels were determined by survey of all active duty chief master sergeants. The level of comprehension for each section for development and promotion to a particular rank is indicated by using a scale of A through D. Enlisted Airmen should use the chart to identify the levels of comprehension of subject matter content for PFE testing preparation and development expectations associated with each rank. Select chief master sergeants serve as subject matter experts in the development and writing of the E-6 PFE. This ADTC identifies specific chapters and section that these chief master sergeants identified as testable content. If a chapter or section is not identified on this ADTC, then no testable content was selected from that topic/subject. This ADTC can assist Airmen in the planning, organizing, and prioritizing of their individual study time. Level of Indicates the level of comprehension necessary for each rank as enlisted Scale Comprehension Air Force professionals Recognizing or recalling knowledge from memory. Remembering is when A Remembering memory is used to produce or retrieve definitions, facts, or lists, or to recite previously learned information. Constructing meaning from different types of functions be they written or graphic B Understanding messages or activities like interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, or explaining. Carrying out or using a procedure through executing or implementing. Applying C Applying relates to or refers to situations where learned material is used through products like models, presentations, interviews, or simulations. Breaking materials or concepts into parts, determining how the parts relate to one D Analyzing another or how they interrelate, or how the parts relate to an overall structure or purpose. 2 Chapter 2—AIR FORCE HERITAGE TSgt Section 2C—The Air Force and the New Millennium B Chapter 3—AIR, SPACE, AND CYBERPOWER TSgt Section 3A—Identifying with Airpower B Chapter 4—MILITARY ORGANIZATION AND COMMAND TSgt Section 4A—United States Armed Forces B Section 4B—Military Departments B Section 4C—Military Command Structure B Section 4D—Air Force Total Force B Section 4E—Air Force Structure B Chapter 6—TRAINING AND EDUCATION TSgt Section 6A—Force Development B Section 6B—Training Responsibilities B Section 6C—Professional Military Education B Chapter 7—CAREER PROGRESSION TSgt Section 7A—Leadership Levels B Section 7B—Enlisted Force Structure C Section 7C—Duty Titles and Special Positions B Chapter 8—ASSESSMENTS AND RECOGNITION TSgt Section 8A—Airman Comprehensive Assessment C Section 8B—Performance Evaluations C Section 8C—Reenlistments and Continuation B Chapter 9—PROMOTIONS SYSTEMS TSgt Section 9A—Promotion Systems and Programs B Section 9B—Promotion Cycles B Section 9C—Preparation and Responsibilities B Section 9D—Enlisted Promotion Testing B Chapter 11—PERSONNEL PROGRAMS AND BENEFITS TSgt Section 11A—Benefits and Services B Section 11B—Leave and Authorized Absences B Chapter 12—FINANCE, MANPOWER, AND RESOURCES TSgt Section 12A—Individual Finances and Allowances B Chapter 13—ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT TSgt Section 13B—Workplace Dynamics B Section 13C—Change and Problem Solving B Section 13D—Team Dynamics B Chapter 14—LEADERSHIP TSgt Section 14A—Responsibility B Section 14B—Active Leadership Role C Section 14C—Introspection B Section 14D—The Art of Leading B Chapter 15—COMMUNICATION TSgt Section 15A—Military Communication B Section 15B—Preparing to Communicate B Section 15C—Written Communication B Section 15D—Spoken Communication B Section 15E—Electronic Messaging C Chapter 16—CRITICAL THINKING AND INNOVATION TSgt Section 16C—Informed Decision-Making B Section 16D—What We Don’t Know B 3 Chapter 17—EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TSgt Section 17C—Preparedness and Protection B Section 17D—Crisis Response and Recovery B Section 17F—Risk Management B Chapter 18—SECURITY TSgt Section 18B—Operations Security B Section 18C—Information Protection B Section 18D—Information Access, Cyber Security and Mobility B Section 18E—Antiterrorism B Chapter 19—STANDARDS OF CONDUCT TSgt Section 19A—Way of Life B Section 19B—Law of Armed Conflict B Section 19C—Code of Conduct B Chapter 20—INSPECTIONS AND MILITARY STANDARDS TSgt Section 20B—Individual Accountability B Section 20C—Appropriate Working Relationships C Section 20D—Addressing Misconduct C Chapter 21—MILITARY JUSTICE TSgt Section 21C—Nonjudicial Punishment B Chapter 22—FITNESS AND READINESS TSgt Section 22E—Readiness State of Mind B Chapter 23—DRESS AND APPEARANCE TSgt Section 23A—Professional Image B Section 23B—Military Uniforms B Section 23C—Accessory Standards B Chapter 24—MILITARY CUSTOMS AND COURTESIES TSgt Section 24A—Honored Traditions B Section 24B—Respect for the Flag B Section 24C—Respect for Individuals C Section 24D—Ceremonies and Events B Chapter 25—PROFESSIONALISM TSgt Section 25A—Air Force Professional B Section 25B—Profession of Arms B Section 25C—Air Force Core Values C Section 25D—Warrior Ethos B 4 Chapter 2 AIR FORCE HERITAGE Section 2C—The Air Force and the New Millennium 2.16. Terrorist Attacks Operation Noble Eagle. Terrorism struck home on 11 September 2001 in a planned attack by Islamic extremists when Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners flying in United States airspace. Two aircraft were flown into the towers of the World Trade Center, one was flown into the Pentagon, and the fourth landed in a remote field in Pennsylvania. There were 6,000 people injured in those events, and 2,996 people who died, including the 19 hijackers. In response, President George W. Bush declared a global war on terrorism. Figure 2.3. is provided to show the timing of each of the four attacks. Figure 2.3. Terrorist Attacks of 11 September 2001. These unprecedented acts of violence left thousands dead, thousands more grieving, and a Nation unsure of its future vulnerabilities. One thing that was for certain was the depth and scope of radical Islamic hatred. The United States immediately focused on protecting our homeland from both internal and external air attacks, and fighter aircraft began flying combat air patrols in the skies over America in support of Operation Noble Eagle. Thousands of National Guard and Reserve personnel were mobilized to protect military and civilian assets, including airports, military installations, and infrastructure. U.S. Air Force fighter, tanker, and surveillance air assets provided 24-hour intercept response coverage for virtually the entire country. Months later, North American Aerospace Defense Command, with more than 100 Air National Guard, Air Force Reserve, and Regular Air Force fighters from 26 locations, continued to monitor American airspace. Across the globe, nations offered support and solidarity as Americans tried to regroup and move forward in the aftermath of the events of 9/11. Examples of bravery and sacrifice continue to circulate to this day of service members and civilians rescuing comrades from burning buildings, fighting fires, providing medical attention, comforting survivors, and volunteering to do whatever they could after the tragedy occurred. 5 2.17. War on Terror – Afghanistan Following the 11 September 2001 attacks, the United States reported that Osama bin Laden was behind the worst terrorist attacks in world history. President Bush demanded that the Taliban, Afghanistan’s ruling government, deliver all leaders of al-Qaeda to the U.S. Government, release all imprisoned foreign nationals, immediately close all terrorist training camps, hand over all terrorists and supporters to authorities, and allow inspectors full access to terrorist training camps. When the Taliban refused, President Bush ordered military forces to the region. Operation Enduring Freedom. Operation Enduring Freedom took the fight against terrorism to foreign soil, most notably to locations where terrorist organizations existed in Afghanistan. Operation Enduring Freedom was focused on forming and acting with an international coalition to remove Afghanistan’s Taliban government. The coalition primarily included forces from the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Jordan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Russia, Spain, Turkey, and other nations. The United States sent approximately 350 aircraft to Afghanistan. Several B-1 and B-52 bombers, F-15 and F-16 fighters, special operations aircraft, RQ-1B and RQ-4A unmanned aerial vehicles, and Navy fighters deployed to bases throughout the country. On 7 October 2001, following continued Taliban refusal to hand over suspected terrorists, United States, British, and French aircraft began a sustained air campaign against terrorist targets in the country.
Recommended publications
  • Biography U N I T E D S T a T E S a I R F O R C E
    BIOGRAPHY U N I T E D S T A T E S A I R F O R C E LIEUTENANT GENERAL TIMOTHY D. HAUGH Lt. Gen. Timothy D. Haugh is the Commander, Sixteenth Air Force; Commander, Air Forces Cyber, and Commander, Joint Force Headquarters-Cyber, Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas. General Haugh is responsible for more than 44,000 personnel conducting worldwide operations. Sixteenth Air Force Airmen deliver multisource intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance products, applications, capabilities and resources. In addition, they build, extend, operate, secure and defend the Air Force portion of the Department of Defense global network. Furthermore, Joint Forces Headquarters-Cyber personnel perform operational planning as part of coordinated efforts to support Air Force component and combatant commanders and, upon approval of the President and/or Secretary of Defense, the execution of offensive cyberspace operations. In his position as Sixteenth Air Force Commander, General Haugh also serves as the Commander of the Service Cryptologic Component. In this capacity, he is responsible to the Director, National Security Agency, and Chief, Central Security Service, as the Air Force’s sole authority for matters involving the conduct of cryptologic activities, including the spectrum of missions related to tactical warfighting and national-level operations. The general leads the global information warfare activities spanning cyberspace operations, intelligence, targeting, and weather for nine wings, one technical center, and an operations center. General Haugh received his commission in 1991, as a distinguished graduate of the ROTC program at Lehigh University. He has served in a variety of intelligence and cyber command and staff assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodal Transport 28 Charting the History of Tents Are Informative and Not Regulatory Or Is a Joint Effort of Multiple Air Force One Directive
    THE MOBILITYTHE MAGAZINE OF AIR MOBILITY COMMAND | SUMMER 2017 FORUM Rota’s Multimodal Transport is a Joint Effort of Multiple Branches and Nations HURRICANES: Brig Gen Richoux Speaks from Experience Volume 26, No. 2 CONTENTS THE MOBILITY FORUM Summer 2017 AIR MOBILITY COMMAND Gen Carlton Everhart II 3 10 16 26 34 DIRECTOR OF SAFETY Col Michael R. Seiler FROM THE TOP 18 Unit Deployment Manager: Are [email protected] 3 Hurricanes: Brig Gen Richoux You Mission Ready? Speaks from Experience 34 Benchmark Cybersecurity 5 So Long, Fellow Airmen Assessment on C-5M EDITORS Kim Brumley RISK MANAGEMENT SEASONAL [email protected] 6 My Pride is All That Hurt CONSIDERATIONS Sherrie Schatz Having a Blast at Home 12 Aerial Port LOSAs Increase 22 Sheree Lewis Safety, Efficiency 30 Water: The Fickle (and [email protected] Deceptive) Element FLIGHT SAFETY Graphic Design Elizabeth Bailey 8 Aviation Ground Mishaps: MOTORCYCLE CULTURE A ‘Good Guy’ Club Four-Year Indicators 26 The Mobility Forum (TMF) is published four times a year by the Director of Safety, Air SAFETY CULTURE AMC HERITAGE Mobility Command, Scott AFB, IL. The con- 10 Rota's Multimodal Transport 28 Charting the History of tents are informative and not regulatory or is a Joint Effort of Multiple Air Force One directive. Viewpoints expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the Branches and Nations policy of AMC, USAF, or any DoD agency. 13 Critical Days of Summer 2017 Contributions: Please email articles and 14 7 Steps to Setting and REGULAR FEATURES photos to [email protected], fax to Reaching Your Safety Goal 20 Center Spread: (580) 628-2011, or mail to Schatz Publishing, 24 I Had Junk in My Trunk! The Rescue Reflex 11950 W.
    [Show full text]
  • FLAG of BOTSWANA - a BRIEF HISTORY Where in the World
    Part of the “History of National Flags” Series from Flagmakers FLAG OF BOTSWANA - A BRIEF HISTORY Where In The World Trivia You must be granted permission from the government to fly the flag. Technical Specification Adopted: 30th September 1966 Proportion: 2:3 Design: A light blue field with horizontal black stripe with white border. Colours: PMS – Blue: 284C Brief History On 31st of March 1885, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland established the Bechuanaland Protectorate when Boer freebooters threatened the people of Botswana. Rather than have a specific colonial flag the Union Jack of Great Britain and Ireland was flown. The Protectorate lasted until 1966 when Botswana became the independent country of the Republic of Botswana and gained its own flag. The flag is a blue field with horizontal black stripe with a white border. This design was specifically chosen to contrast with the flag of South African flag as the country was under apartheid and symbolises harmony and peace between black and European people. The Union Jack of Great Britain and Ireland The Flag of the Republic of Botswana (1885 to 1966) (1966 to Present Day) Coat of Arms of Botswana The Coat of Arms of Botswana were adopted in 1966 and features a shield with three cogwheels representing industry at the top, three waves representing water in the centre and a red bulls head representing cattle herding. At the sides of the shield are zebras; the right-hand zebra holds sorghum and the left hand zebra holds ivory. Underneath is the motto PULA that means ‘rain.’ The Standard of the President of Botswana The Standard of the President of Botswana takes the light blue field from the national flag with a white black-bordered circle with the Coat of Arms of Botswana in the centre.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps AFJROTC
    Air Force Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps AFJROTC Arlington Independent School District Developing citizens of character dedicated to serving their community and nation. 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 TX-031 AFJROTC WING Texas 31st Air Force Junior ROTC Wing was established in Arlington Independent School District in 1968 by an agreement between the Arlington Independent School District and the United States Air Force. The Senior Aerospace Science Instructor (SASI) is a retired Air Force officer. Aerospace Science Instructors (ASIs) are retired senior non-commissioned officers. These instructors have an extensive background in leadership, management, instruction and mentorship. The students who enroll in Air Force Junior ROTC are referred to as “Cadets”. The entire group of cadets is referred to as a Wing. The Cadet Wing is “owned”, managed and operated by students referred to as Cadet Officers and Cadet Non-commissioned Officers. Using this cadet organization structure, allows cadets to learn leadership skills through direct activities. The attached cadet handbook contains policy guidance, requirements and rules of conduct for AFJROTC cadets. Each cadet will study this handbook and be held responsible for knowing its contents. The handbook also describes cadet operations, cadet rank and chain of command, job descriptions, procedures for promotions, awards, grooming standards, and uniform wear. It supplements AFJROTC and Air Force directives. This guide establishes the standards that ensure the entire Cadet Wing works together towards a common goal of proficiency that will lead to pride in achievement for our unit. Your knowledge of Aerospace Science, development as a leader, and contributions to your High School and community depends upon the spirit in which you abide by the provisions of this handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Linkages Study 2015
    Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study conducted by The Principi Group and The SPECTRUM Group Team for the Florida Defense Support Task Force February 10, 2015 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………4 Introduction……………….…………………………………………10 Scope of Study………….…………………………………………..10 Methodology……….………………………………………………..11 Analysis…………………………………………………….………..13 Intrastate Linkages…..………………………………………….…14 Interstate Linkages…………………………………………….…..31 Conclusions………….………….…………………………………..54 Recommendations………………………..………………….…….56 Navy Installation Linkages…………………………………...…..58 Air Force Installation Linkages……..………………………...…67 Team Orlando/National Simulation Center Linkages………..83 Coast Guard Linkages…………………………………………….88 National Guard Linkages…………………………………..……102 2 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study List of Figures Figure 1. Florida’s Major Military Installations and Ranges………………………….14 Figure 2. Key Command and Control Linkages in Florida……………………………15 Figure 3. Key Command and Control Linkages in South Florida…...………………16 Figure 4. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northeast Florida………………16 Figure 5. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northwest Florida……………...17 Figure 6. Key Communication Support Linkages in Florida…………………………18 Figure 7. Key Communications Support Linkages in Northwest Florida………….18 Figure 8. Key Training Linkages in Florida……………………………………………...20 Figure 9. Key Training Linkages in South Florida……………………………………...20 Figure 10. Key Training Linkages
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2 Bio Book
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Keystone Class 2021-2 7-18 June 2021 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Lieutenant General Mike Plehn is the 17th President of the National Defense University. As President of NDU, he oversees its five component colleges that offer graduate-level degrees and certifications in joint professional military education to over 2,000 U.S. military officers, civilian government officials, international military officers and industry partners annually. Raised in an Army family, he graduated from Miami Southridge Senior High School in 1983 and attended the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy with Military Distinction and a degree in Astronautical Engineering in 1988. He is a Distinguished Graduate of Squadron Officer School as well as the College of Naval Command and Staff, where he received a Master’s Degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies. He also holds a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Airpower Studies, as well as a Master of Aerospace Science degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Lt Gen Plehn has extensive experience in joint, interagency, and special operations, including: Middle East Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, and four tours at the Combatant Command level to include U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, and twice at U.S. Southern Command, where he was most recently the Military Deputy Commander. He also served on the Air Staff in Strategy and Policy and as the speechwriter to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • \Aircraft Recognition Manual
    Jf V t 9fn I 4-'!- Vw'^ ' 'o | ^ renai; 408.$ /•> ,A1.AI / -3o FM DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 \AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL SI ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF\ CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS \ \ I 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FM 30-30 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NavWeps 00-80T-75 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AFM 50-40 MARINE CORPS NavMC 2522 AIRCRAFT RECOGNITION MANUAL •a ISSUED BY DIRECTION OF CHIEF OF BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS JUNE 1962 DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY AND THE AIR FORCE, WASHINGTON 25, D.C., 15 June 1962 FM 30-30/NAVWEPS 00-80T-75/AFM 50-40/NAVMC 2522, Aircraft Recognition Manual, is published for the information and guidance of all concerned. i BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARIES OF THE ARMY, THE NAVY, AND THE AIR FORCE: G. H. DECKER, General, Umted States Army, Official: Chief of Staff. J. C. LAMBERT, Major General, United States Army, The Adjutant General. PAUL D. STROOP Rear Admiral, United States Navy, Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons. CURTIS E. LEMAY, Official: Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, R. J. PUGH, Colonel, United States Air Force, Director of Administrative Services. C. H. HAYES, Major General, U.S. Marine Corps, Deputy Chief of Staff (Plans). H DISTRIBUTION: ARMY: Active Army : DCSPER (1) Inf/Mech Div Co/Btry/Trp 7-2 44-112 ACSI (1) (5) except Arm/Abn Div 7- 44-236 52 DCSLOG (2) Co/Trp (1) 8- 44-237 137 DCSOPS(5) MDW (1) 8-500 (AA- 44-446 ACSRC (1) Svc Colleges (3) AH) 44447 CNGB (1) Br Svc Sch (5) except 10-201 44^536
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Wins in Shootout
    AIR FORCE WINS IN SHOOTOUT Keeps trophy from Army another year Page 5 FEBRUARY 22, 2019 • VOLUME 11 • NO. 7 • NO. 11 22, • VOLUME 2019 FEBRUARY 100% INSPECTION DoD pushes commanders to examine all base housing by March Page 4 CHANGING OF THE GUARD Alaska Air National Guard welcomes new commander No. 220 220 No. No. PERMIT PERMIT Page 9 FEATURE 2018 key spouse speaks at JBER By AIRMAN 1ST CLASS Although partially par- CRYSTAL JENKINS alyzed and unable to walk, JBER Public Affairs within a year and a half, she taught herself to walk again Kristen Christy, the 2018 and graduated from high Air Force Key Spouse of the school on time. Year, toured Joint Base El- “I began attending college mendorf-Richardson Feb. 11 and felt a little out of place, to 13, speaking to numerous but my military upbringing members of the community. had taught me to start looking During Christy’s tour, the for my community,” Christy Military and Family Readi- said. “I started by hanging ness Center hosted her as a out where I felt most com- guest speaker for more than fortable, ROTC gatherings. 120 attendees at a military One night I was at an ROTC spouse town hall and lun- party when I met my first cheon with the theme “Tak- husband, a cadet named Don ing Care of People.” Christy. Although his first “It is an honor to have words to me were, ‘I can the opportunity to share my never marry you because my story with the JBER spouse last name is Christy,’ it was community, because I know not long after we fell in love all of us come from different and were married.” places and each of us has our Despite a decorated ca- own unique story we bring to reer of military service, and the table,” Christy said.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation and Maintenance Overview Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Estimates
    OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW FISCAL YEAR 2014 BUDGET ESTIMATES April 2013 OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE (COMPTROLLER) / CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW Page MAJOR ACTIVITIES – continued Page O&M Title Summary ...............................................................1 Facilities Sustainment, Repair & Modernization and Demolition Programs ........................................................127 APPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS Mobilization ...........................................................................134 Army ........................................................................................6 Training and Education ..........................................................141 Navy ........................................................................................16 Recruiting, Advertising, and Examining ...............................149 Marine Corps ..........................................................................26 Command, Control, and Communications (C3) ....................153 Air Force .................................................................................31 Transportation ........................................................................157 Defense-Wide .........................................................................37 Environmental Programs .......................................................161 Reserve Forces ........................................................................39 Contract Services ...................................................................170
    [Show full text]
  • HELP from ABOVE Air Force Close Air
    HELP FROM ABOVE Air Force Close Air Support of the Army 1946–1973 John Schlight AIR FORCE HISTORY AND MUSEUMS PROGRAM Washington, D. C. 2003 i Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schlight, John. Help from above : Air Force close air support of the Army 1946-1973 / John Schlight. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Close air support--History--20th century. 2. United States. Air Force--History--20th century. 3. United States. Army--Aviation--History--20th century. I. Title. UG703.S35 2003 358.4'142--dc22 2003020365 ii Foreword The issue of close air support by the United States Air Force in sup- port of, primarily, the United States Army has been fractious for years. Air commanders have clashed continually with ground leaders over the proper use of aircraft in the support of ground operations. This is perhaps not surprising given the very different outlooks of the two services on what constitutes prop- er air support. Often this has turned into a competition between the two serv- ices for resources to execute and control close air support operations. Although such differences extend well back to the initial use of the airplane as a military weapon, in this book the author looks at the period 1946- 1973, a period in which technological advances in the form of jet aircraft, weapons, communications, and other electronic equipment played significant roles. Doctrine, too, evolved and this very important subject is discussed in detail. Close air support remains a critical mission today and the lessons of yesterday should not be ignored. This book makes a notable contribution in seeing that it is not ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Lodging Guest Book Air Forces Inns | 2
    UNIVERSITY INN MAXWELL-GUNTER GUEST SERVICES DIRECTORY “On the campus of world leadership” Air Force Inns | 1 Table of Content General Information Welcome Letter ......................................................................................................................................................PG 4 University Inn Mission-Vision Statement .......................................................................................................PG 6 Air Force Inn Promise & Forgot a Travel Item ...............................................................................................PG 6 Lodging Information Lodging Responsibility ........................................................................................................................................ PG 8 Occupant Responsibility ..................................................................................................................................... PG 8 Fire and Safety ...................................................................................................................................................... PG 9 Energy Conservation ........................................................................................................................................... PG 9 Energy Conservation Tips .................................................................................................................................PG 10 Alcohol Consumption/ Gatherings / Parties ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]