Arch Bridges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arch Bridges Sheila Marie V. Lapuag CE 521 December 6, 2011 BSCE-V Engr. Geffren Bernardo ARCH BRIDGES • An arch bridge is a bridge with abutments at each end shaped as a curved arch. • Arch bridges cannot bend, that is why they are made from many different types of materials such as masonry materials eg. Stone, brick etc. • An arched bridge channels the weight from above to the foundations below. • Arch bridges don't need additional supports or cables - they will stand on their own for a long time. Forces The arch is squeezed together, and this squeezing force is carried outward along the curve to the supports at each end. The supports, called abutments, push back on the arch and prevent the ends of the arch from spreading apart. Instead of pushing straight down, the load of an arch bridge is carried outward along the curve of the arch to the supports at each end. The weight is transferred to the supports at either end. These supports, called the abutments, carry the load and keep the ends of the bridge from spreading out. The load at the top of the key stone makes each stone on the arch of the bridge press on the one next to it. This happens until the push is applied to the end supports or abutments which are embedded in the ground. HISTORY OF ARCH BRIDGES • Arch bridges are one of the oldest types of bridges and have been built for thousands of years. Arch bridges have great natural strength. • The Romans developed considerable skill in constructing arches and many of their structures remain intact today. However, they were not able to calculate the strength of their-arches although their knowledge of geometry inherited from the Greeks led them to adopt semicircular spans. • Their arches were constructed of stone made into the form of wedge shaped segments, or voussoirs, built up side by side on temporary timber supports until the top piece at the crown of the arch is pushed hom(keystone). • One of the most famous examples of their handiwork is the Pont du Gard aqueduct near Nîmes, France. Built before the birth of Christ, the bridge is held together by mortar only in its top tier; the stones in the rest of the structure stay together by the sheer force of their own weight. • Modern arch bridges are built of concrete. It is an effective way to transfer loads to the ground where foundation conditions are adequate to resist horizontal loads. • A large number of concrete arch bridges have been constructed in the 20th century in both in-situ reinforced concrete and precast concrete. • Today materials like steel and pre-stressed concrete have made it possible to build longer and more elegant arches, including a spectacular 1700 foot span in New River Gorge, West Virginia. (More typically, modern arch bridges span between 200-800 feet.) How arch bridges are built? The wooden form or template (in brown). The stone is built up on top of the form until the arch is complete, after when the form is knocked out or, sometimes, burnt away. For years, engineers used a technique called centering, in which a wooden form supported both spans until they locked together at the top. Before an arch can be built a wooden frame is built. This allows the stones to be put in position. The frame is removed after the stones are in position. A newer method today supports the spans using cables anchored to the ground on either side of the bridge. Skew Arch Bridge o A skew arch (also known as an oblique arch) is a method of construction that enables an arch bridge to span an obstacle at some angle other than a right angle. o This results in the faces of the arch not being perpendicular to its abutments and its plan view being a parallelogram, rather than the rectangle that is the plan view of a regular, or "square" arch. o In the case of a masonry skew arch, the construction requires precise stonecutting as none of the cuts form right angles but once the principles were fully understood in the early 19th century it became considerably easier and cheaper to build a skew arch of brick. The typical span length of arch bridges range from 40 to 150 meters. Advantages of an Arch Bridge . The arch is the strongest shape with the least amount of material known. The arch is also the only shape that can use single individual modules of materials, like brick and stone, and be used to span a distance that straight stone spans could never do. The weight of the story above resting on the top of the arch is transferred down each leg to the ground, instead of pressing on the lower story. The span uses the compressive strength of stone and gravity to allow it to bridge large expanses without the tensile limit presented by the material itself. Disadvantages . The disadvantage is the shape itself. It needs firm support from the sides. Can only be used where the ground is solid and stable. Parts of an Arch Bridge . arch Metal bow-shaped structure supporting the deck, whose load it transfers to the abutments. trussed arch Arched girder consisting of two chords joined by a triangulated network of struts. thrust Point at which the arch is supported by the abutment. lower chord Lower lengthwise steel girder forming the metal arch. deck Set of components making up the structure that carries the bridge’s traffic lanes. abutment Base of the pier; it supports the arch’s weight and thrust. pier Solid concrete construction acting as counterweight to the thrust of the arch against the abutment. column Sturdy component forming a vertical support. portal frame Part of the deck’s frame over firm ground, lying on columns. upper chord Upper lengthwise steel girder forming the metal arch. Did you know that … • An arch ten times as big in every way as another perfectly strong arch will behave completely differently to the smaller arch. The larger arch is, in fact, ten times weaker - or ten times more prone to stress - than the smaller one. This is because the weight of the larger arch goes up by a factor of ten cubed, since it depends on the number of cubic metres of material in the bridge. LIST OF LONGEST ARCH SPANS Sydney Harbour Bridge (Sydney, Australia) Length 1,149 m (3,770 ft) Span 503 m (1,650 ft) Arch construction – steel Completed – 1932 Bayonne Bridge (Kill Van Kull (New Jersey, New York)) Length 1,761 m (5,778 ft) Span 504 m (1,654 ft) Arch construction – steel Completed – 1931 New River Gorge Bridge (Fayetteville, West Virginia) Length 924 m (3,031 ft) Span 518 m (1,699 ft) Arch construction – steel Completed – 1977 Lupu Bridge (Shanghai, China) Length 3,900 m (12,800 ft) Span 550 m (1,800 ft) Arch construction – steel/concrete Completed – 2003 Chaotianmen Bridge (Chongqing, China) – Length 1,741 m (5,712 ft.) Span 552 m (1,811 ft.) Arch construction – steel Completed - 2009 In the Philippines ….. The San Juanico Bridge, part of the Pan- Philippine Highway, stretches from Samar to Leyte across the San Juanico Strait in the Philippines. Its longest length is a steel girder viaduct built on reinforced concrete piers, and its main span is of an arch-shaped truss design. With a total length of 2.16 kilometers (1.34 mi), it is the longest bridge in the Philippines spanning a body of seawater. It is considered one of the most beautifully-designed bridges in Philippines. The bridge has 43 spans and medium size boats can pass beneath its large main arch the top of which rises 41 meters above the sea. Construction commenced in 1969 over San Juanico Strait from Cabalawan, Tacloban City to the municipality of Santa Rita, Samar, with completion in 1973. Types and Classification of Arch Bridge Arches may be classified according to the following parameters: . Structural Articulation . Position of Deck Structural Articulation With regard to structural articulation the arch can be fixed or hinged. In the latter case either one, two or three hinges can be incorporated into the arch rib. While the fixed arch has three redundancies, the introduction of each hinge reduced the indeterminancy by one until, with three hinges, the arch is statically determinate and hence, theoretically, free of the problems of secondary stresses. Although a through arch is shown, but this applies to all type of arch bridges. The concept of the arch varies in relation to the way it absorbs and transfers the roadway’s weight to its support points. a. Three-hinged arch Arch with three roller joints: one at each support and one at the crown. This kind of arch is statically determinate. The thrusts on the abutments, and the bending moments and shearing forces on the arch itself, are not affected by small movement of one abutment relative to the other. This type of arch is therefore used when there is a possibility of unreal settlement of the abutments b. two-hinged arch Arch whose ends rest on an abutment attached by a roller joint. The two hinged arch uses hinged bearings which allow rotation. The only forces generated at the bearings are horizontal and vertical forces. This is perhaps the most commonly used variations for steel arches and is generally a very economical design. c. one-hinged arch Arch whose roller joints is at the crown. It is statically indeterminate to the second degree. It is rarely used because it has no distinct advantages.
Recommended publications
  • Simple Innovative Comparison of Costs Between Tied-Arch Bridge and Cable-Stayed Bridge
    MATEC Web of Conferences 258, 02015 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20192 5802015 SCESCM 20 18 Simple innovative comparison of costs between tied-arch bridge and cable-stayed bridge Järvenpää Esko1,*, Quach Thanh Tung2 1WSP Finland, Oulu, Finland 2WSP Finland, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam Abstract. The proposed paper compares tied-arch bridge alternatives and cable-stayed bridge alternatives based on needed load-bearing construction material amounts in the superstructure. The comparisons are prepared between four tied arch bridge solutions and four cable-stayed bridge solutions of the same span lengths. The sum of the span lengths is 300 m. The rise of arch as well as the height of pylon and cable arrangements follow optimal dimensions. The theoretic optimum rise of tied-arch for minimum material amount is higher than traditionally used for aesthetic reason. The optimum rise for minimum material amount parabolic arch is shown in the paper. The mathematical solution uses axial force index method presented in the paper. For the tied-arches the span-rise-ration of 3 is used. The hangers of the tied-arches are vertical-The tied-arches are calculated by numeric iteration method in order to get moment-less arch. The arches are designed as constant stress arch. The area and the weight of the cross section follow the compression force in the arch. In addition the self-weight of the suspender cables are included in the calculation. The influence of traffic loads are calculated by using a separate FEM program. It is concluded that tied-arch is a competitive alternative to cable-stayed bridge especially when asymmetric bridge spans are considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Steel Arch Bridges in China and Japan
    Journal of JSCE, Vol. 1, 214-227, 2013 COMPARISON BETWEEN STEEL ARCH BRIDGES IN CHINA AND JAPAN Kangming CHEN1, Shozo NAKAMURA2, Baochun CHEN3, Qingxiong WU3 and Takafumi NISHIKAWA4 1Student Member of JSCE, PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Nagasaki University (1-14, Bukyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan) 2Member of JSCE, Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Nagasaki University (1-14, Bukyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan) E-mail: [email protected] 3Professor, College of Civil Eng., University of Fuzhou (2, Xueyuan Road, Minhou, Fuzhou 350108, China) 4Member of JSCE, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Nagasaki University (1-14, Bukyo-machi, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan) A review of the current status and progress of steel arch bridges in China and Japan, as well as an outline of the design vehicle load and design method against global buckling for such bridges, is presented in this paper. The existing steel arch bridges in China and Japan were analyzed in terms of year of completion, main span length, structure type, main arch rib form and construction method. It is shown that the steel arch bridge in China has developed rapidly since 2000, characterized by a long main span, while in Japan it has stepped into a fast-growing period since 1955, with medium and small bridges holding a great majority. As for the main span length, most of the bridges have a span from 100m to 250m in China, while majority of bridges are shorter than 150m in Japan. Over 80% of the bridges in China are through and half-through bridge types, and the arch ribs are hingeless structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Arched Bridges Lily Beyer University of New Hampshire - Main Campus
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2012 Arched Bridges Lily Beyer University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Beyer, Lily, "Arched Bridges" (2012). Honors Theses and Capstones. 33. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/33 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CIVIL ENGINEERING Arched Bridges History and Analysis Lily Beyer 5/4/2012 An exploration of arched bridges design, construction, and analysis through history; with a case study of the Chesterfield Brattleboro Bridge. UNH Civil Engineering Arched Bridges Lily Beyer Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter I: History
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 132 2017 Global Conference on Mechanics and Civil Engineering (GCMCE 2017) Virtual Assembly Technology on Steel Bridge Members of Bolt Connection Zhu Hao CCCC Second Harbors Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430040, China CCCC Highway Bridges National Engineering Research Centre CO., Ltd. [email protected] Keywords: steel bridge members; virtual assembly; steel truss girder; bolted connection; digital measure Abstract: Trial assembling is an indispensable procedure for the large bridge steel elements, especially for the high strength blot connected steel elements. To replace the traditional assembling method inside the factory, this paper brings out the virtual assembling procedures and method based on the bolt connected bridge, and introduces the typical data measuring method and model establishing, which can be used for complicated elements multi-surface assembling of the steel truss bridge calculation. This technique has already been tested in Hutong Yangtze River Bridge non-navigation span steel structure factory by the means of advanced laser tracking test system. The virtual trial assembling software realized the complicated steel truss girder manufacturing deviation analysis and assembling deviation analysis. After perfecting, the bridge trial assembling inside the factory can be replaced by this method. 1. Introduction In recent years, truss bridge has become common in railway bridges and highway and railway combined bridges. With the development of high-speed rail for the past few years, the long-span steel truss bridge has also developed rapidly, such as: Wuhan Tianxingzhou Yangtze River Bridge, Wuhu Yangtze River Bridge, Chongqing Chaotianmen Bridge and Baling River Bridge. The main girder structure of these bridges all adopted truss structure as they all have large quantity of member bars installed and complicated bolting or welding joints.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Bridge Is a Structure
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Bridge is a structure that is built over a railway, river, or road so that people or vehicles can cross from one side to the other. Another definition of the bridge is a structure built to span physical obstacles without closing the way underneath such as a body of water, valley, or road, for the purpose of providing passage over the obstacle. A bridge is included in an important component of the road because it determines the maximum load of vehicles that can pass through the road [1]. The history of the bridge has been very long along with the occurrence of transportation between humans with other humans and with the environment around, various - kinds of shapes and construction materials used to change in accordance with the progress of the era and technology ranging from the construction of a very simple bridge to use construction that can be spelled out very great. The first bridge was made using wood tied to cross the river. The use of reeds or other fibers knitted together can bind the materials used to build the bridge at first [1]. The bridge is the most important part in the transportation of land and sea. Generally bridges are used for connecting roads across rivers, hills, mountains, connections between road access (intersections not intersect), or inter island links. Sometimes appropriate technical analysis and needs in the field required a bridge with a long stretch. User convenience factor is one of the important variables in determining type and model of long span bridge [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Arched Bridges
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Honors Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2012 Arched Bridges Lily Beyer University of New Hampshire - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/honors Part of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Beyer, Lily, "Arched Bridges" (2012). Honors Theses and Capstones. 33. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/33 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE CIVIL ENGINEERING Arched Bridges History and Analysis Lily Beyer 5/4/2012 An exploration of arched bridges design, construction, and analysis through history; with a case study of the Chesterfield Brattleboro Bridge. UNH Civil Engineering Arched Bridges Lily Beyer Contents Contents ..................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • China Propertiesproperties
    ChinaChina PropertiesProperties NovemberNovember 28,28, 20072007 Disclaimer Wheelock (Stock code: 20) & Wharf (Stock code: 4) Group Presentation Disclaimer All information and data are provided for information purposes only. All opinions included herein constitute Wheelock and Wharf’s judgment as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The Group, its subsidiaries and affiliates hereby disclaim (i) all express, implied, and statutory warranties of any kind to user and/or any third party including warranties as to accuracy, timeliness, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose; and (ii) any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the information and data contained herein. China Properties 2 Presentation Outline Introduction Flagship Projects - Shanghai Wheelock Square, Shanghai - Wuxi Super Tower, Wuxi - Suzhou Super Tower, Suzhou - Hongxing Lu, Chengdu 。IFC 。IFC Tiandi Residential Projects China Properties - Wholly-owned -J/V Outlook 3 China Macro Economic Environment Government revenue rose by 30% Vs last year Foreign exchange reserves ~ US$1,400B at Q3 2007 Low foreign debts ~ about 12% of GDP as at end of 2006 Inflation rate ~ 4.4% (Jan – Oct 2007) China Properties 4 Market Outlook China Property Market Robust economic growth and steady wealth creation process with increasing domestic demand in housing in China → continue to benefit its real estate developments Robust economic growth – 8-9% GDP growth p.a. and even higher in certain cities (11% in 2007) Growth in private enterprise formation ~ over 16% for 2006, ie. about 5 million private enterprises in mainland now (for 10-year up to 2005, the annual growth rate was about 30%!) Growth in automobile sales ~ over 20% p.a.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Civil Engineering
    Н. К. Дмитриева К. Н. Подписано к изготовлению 24.08.2017 1 CD-R. 5,5 Мб. Тираж 200 экз. Изд. № 54 CIVIL ENGINEERINGAND EDUCATION Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования ПЕТРОЗАВОДСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ 185910, Петрозаводск, пр. Ленина, 33 https://petrsu.ru Тел. (8142) 71-10-01 Изготовлено в Издательстве ПетрГУ 185910, Петрозаводск, пр. Ленина, 33 URL: press.petrsu.ru/UNIPRESS/UNIPRESS.html Н. К. Дмитриева Тел. / факс (8142) 78-15-40 [email protected] Education and Civil Engineering Учебное электронное пособие по английскому языку для обучающихся по направлению подготовки бакалавриата «Строительство» Министерство образования и науки Российской Федерации Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования ПЕТРОЗАВОДСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ Н. К. Дмитриева Education and Civil Engineering Учебное электронное пособие по английскому языку для обучающихся по направлению подготовки бакалавриата «Строительство» Петрозаводск Издательство ПетрГУ 2017 УДК 811.111 Unit 1 ББК 81.432.1 Д534 The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one. Malcolm Forbes Рецензенты: О. Л. Добрынина, доцент, Exercise 1. Read the following words aloud and pay attention to their pronunciation. кандидат педагогических наук, институт иностранных языков ПетрГУ, кафедра ИЯЕТНиС; I. Ancient Russia, ancient language, ancient people, ancient culture, feudal state, feudal tradi- tions, feudal laws, national feuds, nation, nationalities, national language, early morning, early М. Н. Горанская, доцент, кандидат педагогических наук, death, write (wrote, written), written works, written language, place, replace, replacement, exist, Карельский филиал Российской академии народного хозяйства existence, existent, existed, develop, developed, development, involve, involved, involvement, и государственной службы при Президенте civil, civilize, civilized, civilization, number, numerous, numerical, treasures, treasure funds, Российской Федерации, кафедра иностранных языков.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges
    Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridges CIV498H1 S Group Design Project Instructor: Dr. Homayoun Abrishami Team 2: Fei Wei 1000673489 Jonny Yang 1000446715 Yibo Zhang 1000344433 Chiyun Zhong 999439022 Executive Summary The entire project report consists of two parts. The first section, Part A, presents a complete qualitative description of typical prestressed concrete bridge design process. The second part, Part B, provides an actual quantitative detailed design a prestressed concrete bridge with respect to three different design standards. In particular, the first part of the report reviews the failure of four different bridges in the past with additional emphasis on the De La Concorde Overpass in Laval, Quebec. Various types of bridges in terms of materials used, cross-section shape and structural type were investigated with their application as well as the advantages and disadvantages. In addition, the predominant differences of the Canadian Highway and Bridge Design Code CSA S6-14 and CSA S6-66, as well as AASHTO LRFD 2014 were discussed. After that, the actual design process of a prestressed concrete bridge was demonstrated, which started with identifying the required design input. Then, several feasible conceptual design options may be proposed by design teams. Moreover, the purpose and significance of structural analysis is discussed in depth, and five different typical analysis software were introduced in this section. Upon the completion of structural analysis, the procedure of detailed structure design and durability design were identified, which included the choice of materials and dimensions of individual specimens as well as the detailed design of any reinforcement profile. Last but not least, the potential construction issues as well as the plant life management and aging management program were discussed and presented at the end of the Part A.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Bridges Historic Bridges 397 Survey Report for Historic Highway Bridges
    6 HISTORIC BRIDGES HISTORIC BRIDGES 397 SURVEY REPORT FOR HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES HIGHWAY FOR HISTORIC REPORT SURVEY 1901-1920 PERIOD By the turn of the century, bridge design, as a profession, had sufficiently advanced that builders ceased erecting several of the less efficient truss designs such as the Bowstring, Double Intersection Pratt, or Baltimore Petit trusses. Also, the formation of the American Bridge Company in 1901 eliminated many small bridge companies that had been scrambling for recognition through unique truss designs or patented features. Thus, after the turn of the century, builders most frequently erected the Warren truss and Pratt derivatives (Pratt, Parker, Camelback). In addition, builders began to erect concrete arch bridges in Tennessee. During this period, counties chose to build the traditional closed spandrel design that visually evoked the form of the masonry arch. Floods in 1902 and 1903 that destroyed many bridges in the state resulted in counties going into debt to undertake several bridge replacement projects. One of the most concentrated bridge building periods at a county level occurred shortly before World War I as a result of legislation the state passed in 1915 that allowed counties to pass bond issues for road and bridge construction. Consequently, several counties initiated large road construction projects, for example, Anderson County (#87, 01-A0088-03.53) and Unicoi County (#89, 86-A0068- 00.89). This would be the last period that the county governments were the most dominant force in road and bridge construction. This change in leadership occurred due to the creation of the Tennessee State Highway Department in 1915 and the passage of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Achievements and Challenge of Long Span Bridges in China
    Crimson Publishers Opinion Wings to the Research Recent Achievements and Challenge of Long Span Bridges in China Hongmei Tan1,2* and Xiuping Wu1,2 1State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering, China 2Mountain Bridge and Materials Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education, China ISSN: 2639-0574 Opinion Recently, bridges are becoming longer, wider and more sophisticated in China and over the world, in particular, with longer span length or so-called long span bridges. Nevertheless, achievements and challenge are coexisting in girder, arch, cable-stayed and suspension types. Long span girder bridges Girder bridges are most widely used bridge type with three sub-categories, simply supported system, continuous system and continuous rigid frame system. The current longest span of simply supported beam bridge is only 76m while continuous beam bridge has the longest span of 165m. Continuous rigid frame bridge has the shortest history but the greatest bridging capacity in girder bridges. The span length of this type of girder bridge *1Corresponding author: State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Hongmei Engineering, Tan, nd Mountain Bridge and Materials Engineering firstly exceeded 250m in Humen Bridge of 270m China in 1997, and gradually increased to Research Center of Ministry of Education, 330mFor in the the 2 2nd Shibanpo Shibanpo Bridge, Bridge the in Chinabox girder in 2006. bridge’s long span was made economically and China Submission: technologically feasible by using steel-concrete hybrid structures, within which a 103m steel box girder to reduce the weight of the structure. Therefore, the maximum hogging moment of Published: May 21, 2019 box girder in the middle of the 330 m main span, is connecting monolithically to the concrete May 23, 2019 the 330m spanned hybrid girder is about the same as the 270m spanned Humen Secondary Bridge with PC girder.
    [Show full text]