Print Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906
Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906 Volker Sellin European Monarchies from 1814 to 1906 A Century of Restorations Originally published as Das Jahrhundert der Restaurationen, 1814 bis 1906, Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2014. Translated by Volker Sellin An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libra- ries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License, as of February 23, 2017. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. ISBN 978-3-11-052177-1 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-052453-6 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-052209-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover Image: Louis-Philippe Crépin (1772–1851): Allégorie du retour des Bourbons le 24 avril 1814: Louis XVIII relevant la France de ses ruines. Musée national du Château de Versailles. bpk / RMN - Grand Palais / Christophe Fouin. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Contents Introduction 1 France1814 8 Poland 1815 26 Germany 1818 –1848 44 Spain 1834 63 Italy 1848 83 Russia 1906 102 Conclusion 122 Bibliography 126 Index 139 Introduction In 1989,the world commemorated the outbreak of the French Revolution two hundred years earlier.The event was celebratedasthe breakthrough of popular sovereignty and modernconstitutionalism. -
Country Coding Units
INSTITUTE Country Coding Units v11.1 - March 2021 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2021. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v11.1” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this ven- ture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/about/ funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) . -
The Black Sea and the Turkish Straits: Resurgent Strategic Importance in the 21St Century
The Black Sea and the Turkish Straits: Resurgent Strategic Importance in the 21st Century THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Andrew M. Hascher Graduate Program in Slavic and East European Studies The Ohio State University 2019 Master’s Examination Committee Angela Brintlinger, PhD, Advisor Yana Hashamova, PhD Rudy Hightower, PhD Copyrighted by Andrew M. Hascher 2019 Abstract The Black Sea and the Turkish Straits have played an important geopolitical role in the world since the time of antiquity, despite the Black Sea being a geographically closed body of water. The objective of this paper is to articulate the importance of the Black Sea region as a source of geopolitical power, both historically and moving into the future. Of particular importance are the power dynamics between the Russian Federation, Turkey and the West. This paper reviews the history of the region and the major treaties over time which attempted to answer the “Straits Question” of access to and from the Black Sea via the Bosphorus and Dardanelles Straits. Then analysis of the current geopolitical situation and a projection for the future of the region is offered based on the research. Analysis of the history and diplomacy of the area shows that the major actors continue to place a great deal of strategic importance on their territorial claims, military position and economic standing in the Black Sea region. The evidence shows that the Russians place an enormous level of importance on the Black Sea as it holds their only viable warm water ports. -
Interpreting Travel Writings of the Ticknors and Other Privileg
WHAT AMERICANS SAID ABOUT SAXONY, AND WHAT THIS SAYS ABOUT THEM: INTERPRETING TRAVEL WRITINGS OF THE TICKNORS AND OTHER PRIVILEGED AMERICANS 1800-1850 by ASHLEY SIDES Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2008 Copyright © by Ashley Sides 2008 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To God I am thankful for the fascinating complexity of humanity, which makes the study of history so challenging and interesting, and for the opportunity and ability to pursue studies of this history. I am also deeply grateful for the support of my wife, Jamie, through this process. From the very beginning she has made my goals hers, has encouraged me, and has patiently sacrificed to help me get through this Master’s program. I dedicate this work to her. I have been blessed to study under excellent professors at the University of Texas at Arlington. Some, in particular, stand out. Professor Thomas Adam has been the most important influence in my graduate studies. He introduced me to the Ticknors and their journals in the first place, and has mentored me through a graduate research assistantship and this thesis. I am indebted to him for the topic of this thesis, which he suggested and I ultimately found quite fascinating. Professors Steven Reinhardt and Joyce Goldberg have helped me to improve my writing by their strict emphasis on good use of language. I also greatly enjoyed working for Professor Goldberg as a graduate teaching assistant, in the process learning a lot about the art of teaching college students. -
Geographia Polonica Vol. 90 No. 3 (2017) Political and Administrative Boundaries of the German Statei N the 20Th Century
Geographia Polonica 2017, Volume 90, Issue 3, pp. 335-350 https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0095 INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY AND SPATIAL ORGANIZATION POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES www.igipz.pan.pl www.geographiapolonica.pl POLITICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES OF THE GERMAN STATE IN THE 20TH CENTURY* Piotr Eberhardt Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw: Poland e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The paper presents the changes in the political and administrative boundaries of the German state, which took place during the 20th century. The starting point is constituted by the political pattern having developed after the establishment of the German Empire in 1871, this pattern lasting until the World War I. Then, the territorial consequences are considered of the decisions, taken at the Versailles Peace Conference. After the presentation of the situation existing during the inter-war period, the political transformations are shown of the annexation politics of the Nazi Germany. The final part of the paper is devoted to the territorial effects that the Potsdam Treaty brought for the defeated Germany. Key words political and administrative boundaries • German Empire • German Republic • Nazi Germany • Versailles Peace Conference • Potsdam Treaty • World War I • World War II Germany before the World War I were often yet the consequences of the feu- dal breakdown of the German Reich. These The German Empire, established in 1871 af- elements of historical heritage were very ter the victorious war with France, had a very strongly embedded in the consciousness complicated political and administrative struc- of the Germans, and the attempts of eliminat- ture. -
Congress of Vienna
CONGRESS OF VIENNA MUNUC 32 UPDATE PAPER Introduction to Nobility Understanding the Noble system is important to understanding hierarchy and alliances in Europe. Generally, land is organized as a ‘title’ which is presented to a family. These titles confer corresponding noble ranks upon their holder. The titles as well are arranged in a hierarchy, with larger titles usually including a series of enfiefed smaller titles below it. For example, an Empire may have several Kingdoms and numerous Duchies inside of it associated with its title. A generalized set of titles and the title-holder nomenclatures is giving below in descending order: 1. Empire - Emperor / Empress 2. Kingdom - King / Queen 3. Archduchy - Archduke / Archduchess 4. Grand Duchy - Grand Duke / Grand Duchess 5. Duchy - Duke / Duchess 6. County - Count / Countess 7. Barony - Baron / Baroness There are also cases where land is held by Christian theocratic leadership corresponding to ecclesiastical position: 1. Prince Archbishopric - Prince Archbishop (Compare to Duchy level title) 2. Prince Bishopric - Prince Bishop (Compare to County level title) 3. Prince Abbot - Prince Abbot (Compare to Barony title) Certain titles were bestowed as a reward for bureaucratic service or to recognize the non-successive low nobility. These titles did not bestow any land rights: 1. Marquis / Marquess 2. Viscount / Viscountess 3. Baronet / Baronetess 4. Master (Mr.) / Mistress (Ms. or Mrs.) Usage of these titles varied from culture to culture, and each title has different terminology in different languages ex. Herzog, Graf, and Freiherr are Duke, Count, and Baron in German. Titles could be held in the plural, united by only their monarch. -
Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835)
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 7-1-2020 Reshaping an Earthly Paradise: Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835) Gregory DeVoe Tomlinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlinson, Gregory DeVoe, "Reshaping an Earthly Paradise: Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835)" (2020). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 5308. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5308 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. RESHAPING AN EARTHLY PARADISE: LAND ENCLOSURE AND BAVARIAN STATE CENTRALIZATION (1779-1835) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Gregory DeVoe Tomlinson B.A., San José State University, 2009 M.A., San José State University, 2012 August 2020 Acknowledgments The Central European History Society (CEHS) funded a visit to the Bayerisches Haupstaatsarchiv and Staatsarchiv München in the summer of 2016. Further support came from the LSU history department and the generous contributions of members of the LSU Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) for a subsequent visit in the summer of 2018. The staffs of the Bayerisches Haupstaatsarchiv and Staatsarchiv München are extremely dedicated, professional, and were more than helpful with their assistance. -
Demystifying the Fairy Tale King
Christof Botzenhart. "Ein SchattenkÖÆ’¶nig ohne Macht will ich nicht sein": Die RegierungstÖÆ’¤tigkeit KÖÆ’¶nig Ludwigs II. von Bayern. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2004. xxxii + 234 pp. EUR 22.00, cloth, ISBN 978-3-406-10737-5. Reviewed by Adam Rosenbaum Published on H-German (September, 2006) Within the feld of Bavarian history, no other ginning of his reign in 1864, the young king bus‐ topic has seen as much ink spilled on it as the ied himself with current political issues and culti‐ brief but colorful life of the region's most notori‐ vated regular contact with his ministers. Botzen‐ ous monarch, Ludwig II. The common labels of hart argues further that Ludwig pursued a consis‐ "Swan King" and "Märchenkönig" begin to suggest tent, twofold agenda during his turbulent reign. the extent to which the life of this monarch has First, he was unwavering in his advocacy of the been romanticized since his death in 1886. Stan‐ notion that a monarch was the holy and unassail‐ dard works have reinforced such images by focus‐ able head of state with absolute power (p. 41). Sec‐ ing on the more extraordinary elements of the ond, he was determined to protect all elements of king's life, including his rocky patronage of com‐ Bavarian independence and sovereignty, even af‐ poser Richard Wagner, his progressively more er‐ ter the disheartening events of 1870-71. ratic behavior and rumored mental instability In the end, the former concern had more of and, of course, the construction of his "fairy tale an impact on the king's attitudes toward the gov‐ castles." Few works have challenged the dominant ernment, and Botzenhart posits that Ludwig's perception of the king as a detached and hopeless‐ frustration over his diminished status as a consti‐ ly idealistic man with neither a frm grasp on real‐ tutional monarch led him to withdraw into seclu‐ ity nor a discernible interest in everyday affairs of sion during the fnal years of his reign. -
Country Coding Units
INSTITUTE Country Coding Units V 10 - March 2020 Copyright © University of Gothenburg, V-Dem Institute All rights reserved Suggested citation: Coppedge, Michael, John Gerring, Carl Henrik Knutsen, Staffan I. Lindberg, Jan Teorell, and Lisa Gastaldi. 2020. ”V-Dem Country Coding Units v10” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. Funders: We are very grateful for our funders’ support over the years, which has made this venture possible. To learn more about our funders, please visit: https://www.v-dem.net/en/ v-dem-institute/funders/ For questions: [email protected] 1 Contents Suggested citation: . .1 1 Notes 7 1.1 ”Country” . .7 2 Africa 9 2.1 Central Africa . .9 2.1.1 Cameroon (108) . .9 2.1.2 Central African Republic (71) . .9 2.1.3 Chad (109) . .9 2.1.4 Democratic Republic of the Congo (111) . .9 2.1.5 Equatorial Guinea (160) . .9 2.1.6 Gabon (116) . .9 2.1.7 Republic of the Congo (112) . 10 2.1.8 Sao Tome and Principe (196) . 10 2.2 East/Horn of Africa . 10 2.2.1 Burundi (69) . 10 2.2.2 Comoros (153) . 10 2.2.3 Djibouti (113) . 10 2.2.4 Eritrea (115) . 10 2.2.5 Ethiopia (38) . 10 2.2.6 Kenya (40) . 11 2.2.7 Malawi (87) . 11 2.2.8 Mauritius (180) . 11 2.2.9 Rwanda (129) . 11 2.2.10 Seychelles (199) . 11 2.2.11 Somalia (130) . 11 2.2.12 Somaliland (139) . 11 2.2.13 South Sudan (32) . 11 2.2.14 Sudan (33) . -
In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building
In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building, and the German Army, 1866-1918 By Gavin Wiens A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Gavin Wiens, 2019 In the Service of Kaiser and King: State Sovereignty, Nation-Building, and the German Army, 1866-1918 Gavin Wiens Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2019 Abstract From its creation during the Wars of Unification (1864-71) until its defeat at the end of the First World War, the German army remained a federal institution. To be sure, the imperial constitution recognized the Kaiser as commander-in-chief of Germany’s land forces. Under the Kaiser’s direction, the Prussian war ministry prepared the military budget and the Prussian General Staff drafted operational plans for future wars. A patchwork of military agreements nevertheless limited the authority of the Kaiser and Prussia’s military leaders over nearly one- quarter of the German army. According to these agreements, separate war ministries, cadet schools, and general staffs oversaw the arming, clothing, feeding, housing, and training of Bavarians, Saxons, and Württembergers, while the monarchs of Germany’s three smaller kingdoms determined personnel appointments, the deployment of units, and even the design of insignia and uniforms. The army’s contingent-based structure ensured that Prussians and non-Prussians served alongside, but only rarely with, one another after 1871. Based on research in archives and libraries in Germany, Austria, England, and the United States, this dissertation explores the means by which the smaller armies of Bavaria, ii Saxony, and Württemberg were integrated into Prussia’s much larger military structure after 1871 and seeks to understand why the German army, burdened by numerous loyalties and overlapping spheres of control, did not simply fall apart during the First World War. -
The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871
Te Kingdom of Württemberg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871. Bodie Alexander Ashton School of History and Politics Discipline of History Te University of Adelaide Submitted for the postgraduate qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (History) May 2014 For Kevin and Ric; and for June, Malcolm and Kristian. Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Notes xiii Introduction 15 Chapter 1 35 States and Nation in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Chapter 2 67 Stuttgart and Vienna before 1848 Chapter 3 93 Te Kingdom of Württemberg and Early Kleindeutschland Chapter 4 123 Independence and South German Particularism, 1815-1848 Chapter 5 159 Te Years of Prophecy and Change, 1848-1849 Chapter 6 181 Counterrevolution, Reaction and Reappraisals, 1850-1859 Chapter 7 207 Six Years of Autumn: 1860-1866 Chapter 8 251 Te Unification of Germany, 1866-1871 Conclusion 295 Bibliography 305 ABSTRACT _ THE TRADITIONAL DISCOURSE of the German unification maintains that it was the German great powers - Austria and Prussia - that controlled German destiny, yet for much of this period Germany was divided into some thirty-eight states, each of which possessed their own institutions and traditions. In explaining the formation of Germany, the orthodox view holds that these so-called Mittel- and Kleinstaaten existed largely at the whim of either Vienna or Berlin, and their policies, in turn, were dictated or shaped by these two power centres. According to this reading of German history, a bipolar sociopolitical structure existed, whereby the Mittelstaaten would declare their allegiances to either the Habsburg or Hohenzollern crowns. Te present work rejects this model of German history, through the use of the case study of the southwestern Kingdom of Württemberg. -
The Impact of Institutions on Innovation*
The Impact of Institutions on Innovation* Alexander Donges, Jean-Marie A. Meier, Rui C. Silva October 27, 2017 Abstract We study the impact of inclusive institutions on innovation using novel, hand- collected, county-level data for Imperial Germany. Exploiting the timing and geography of the French occupation of different German regions after the French Revolution as an instrument for institutional quality, we find that the number of patents per capita was more than twice as high in counties with the longest occupation as in unoccupied counties. Conservative social norms and low financial development weaken the impact of institutions on innovation. The results suggest that innovation is a quantitatively plausible channel for the previously documented effect of institutions on economic pros- perity. Keywords: Innovation, Patents, Institutions, Institutional Reform, Economic Growth. JEL classification: O31, O43, N43, N13, K40, P16. *Meier would like to thank the Deloitte Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship at London Business School for providing financial support. We thank Taylor Begley, Bo Bian, Rajesh Chandy, Jo~aoCocco, Xavier Duran, Maximilian Eber (discussant), Julian Franks, Francisco Gomes, Juanita Gonzalez-Uribe, Walker Hanlon, Sebastian Hohmann, Giampaolo Lecce (discussant), Stefan Lewellen, Anton Lines, Maria- Teresa Marchica (discussant), Elias Papaioannou, Florian Ploeckl, Raghavendra Rau, David Schoenherr, Max-Stephan Schulze, Felix Selgert, Henri Servaes, Janis Skrastins, Jan Starmans, Jochen Streb, Carsten Trenkler, Paolo