DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting of the Metro-North Railroad Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

• Metropolitan Transportation Authority ~ Meeting of the Metro-NorthI Railroad Committee May 2014 Members J. Sedore, Chair F. Ferrer, MTA Vice Chairman J. Balian R. Bickford J. Blair N. Brown J. Kay S. Metzger C. Moerdler J. Molloy M. Pally A. Saul C. Wortendyke Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, April 28, 2014 Meeting Held at 347 Maclison j\.venue New York, New York 10017 8:30 a.m. The following members were present: Hon. Fernando Ferrer, Vice Chairman, MTA Hon. James L. Sedore, Jr., Chairman of the Committee Hon. Mitchell H. Pally Hon. Jonathan A. Ballan Hon. Robert C. Bickford Hon. James F. Blair Hon. Norman Brown Hon. Susan G. Metzger Hon. Charles G. Moerdler Hon. John]. Molloy Hon. Carl V. Wortendyke Not Present: Hon. Jeffrey A. Kay Hon. Andrew M. Saul Also Present Hon. Ira R. Greenberg Hon. Mark D. Lebow Hon. Mark Page Hon. James Redeker, Commissioner, CDOT Joseph]. Giulietti - President, Metro-North Railroad Donna Evans - Chief of Staff Ralph Agritelley- Vice President, Labor Relations Katherine Betries-Kendall- Vice President Human Resources Michael R. Coan - Chief, MTA POllce Department Susan Doering - Vice President-Customer Service & Stations Randall Fleischer - Senior Director, Business Development, Facilities and Marketing James B. Henly - Vice President and General Counsel Michael Horodniceanu, President, MTA Capital Construction John Kesich- Senior Vice President Operations Anne Kirsch - Chief Safety Officer Timothy McCarthy - Senior Director, Capital Programs Kim Porcelain - Vice President - Finance and Information Systems Robert Rodriguez - Director - Diversity and EEO Michael Shiffer - Vice President - Operations Planning Page 3 The members of the Metro-N orth Committee met joindy with the members of the Long Island Committee. Mr. Pally, as Chainnan of the Long Island Committee, called the joint meeting to order. He acknowledged and welcomed Commissioner Redeker of CDOT. Seven public speakers addressed the Conunittee. Orrin Getz of Rockland County discussed west- of- Hudson Metro-North service and the federal process for PTC installations. He stated that President Giulietti should hold a meet and greet with west-of~Hudson riders, commented on Pascack Valley Line delays and noted that New Jersey Transit will be undertaking a review similar to the FRA's "Deep Dive" ~eview of Metro-North operations. Additional details of the comments made by Mr. Getz and the remaining speakers, who did not discuss matters relating to Metro-North, are contained in the video recording of the meeting produced by the MTA and maintained in the MTA records. Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Committee approved the minutes of the March 24, 2014 .Committee meeting. There were no changes to the 2014 work plan. MTA LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD PRESIDENT'S REPORT President Williams reported on Long Island Rail Road matters. She noted that the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North are working closely on the development of Positive Train Control (pTC)and have worked together to negotiate change orders to accelerate the PTC delivery schedule. The details of President Williams' report are contained in the minutes of the Long Island Rail Road Committee held this day and in the video recording of the meeting produced by the MTA and maintained in the MTA records. MTA METRO-NORTH RAILROAD PRESIDENT'S REPORT President Giulietti reported on Metro-North Railroad matters. President Giulietti noted that this is the first joint meeting of the railroad committees he has attended, and expressed his appreciation of the partnership that has developed with the Long Island Rail Road. He also expressed his appreciation to CDOT Commissioner James Redeker and Deputy Commissioner Anna Barry for their attendance at the Committee meeting and for their participation at a recent presidential "meet and greet" held in Connecticut. President Giulietti discussed the FRA "Deep Dive" review and the important steps Metro­ North has taken to reestablish safety as the railroad's unmistakable priority. He reported that a progress meeting was recendy held with the FRA and Metro-North will submit a plan to the FRA by May 17 that addresses the concerns raised in the "Deep Dive" rev1ew. A number of safety improvements which address the FRA's concerns are to be implemented prior to the May 17 submission date as part of the 100-Day Action Plan. Continuing the discussion on the railroad's commitment to safety, President Giulietti noted that he has reorganized the Metro-North Safety Department to focus solely on safety. Company-wide safety stand downs were held on March 11 and April 10 with such meetings henceford1 to be held on a quarterly basis. Metro-North has heightened the monitoring of speed restrictions by reviewing randomly selected event recorders, utilizing radar gun enforcement and observations made by supervisors riding trains. A plan has been developed to utilize advanced inspection technology to increase the effectiveness of track inspections and ensure that track is maintained to FRA and Metro- Page 4 North standards. The Enhanced Employee Protection System (EEPS), an industry-leading system developed in-house that significantly increases the safety of workers on the tracks by putting track block placement and removal in tl1e hands of the worker on the track, has been completed ahead of schedule. Metro-North and Long Island Rail Road are working to accelerate implementation ofPTC technology. The railroads are also working toward implementation of an FRA Confidential Close Call Reporting System (C3RS) that allows employees to anonymously report unsafe events and conditions that could lead to serious problems without fear of reprisal. President Giulietti outlined the status of Metro-North's lOa-Day Action Plan, noting that each initiative undertaken will support one or more of four key goals: promoting a culture of safety, adopting concrete safety enhancements, restoring reliable service and improving communication to customers and employees. The action plan will address the findings of ilie FRA "Deep Dive" report and of the MTA's Blue Ribbon Panel on Safety. President Giulietti reported on the details of the new train schedules to become effective May 11, after the Bronx track rehabilitation program has been completed. The new timetable, which will be more reliable ilian the one currently in place, was developed after a detailed analysis of performance and train running times conducted by the Metro-Norili Planning Department, with particular focus on performance and train running times on the New Haven Line. The schedule changes, among other things, address speed restrictions put in place after ilie serious incidents that took place in 2013, infrastructure improvement work to be undertaken in New York and Connecticut, and increased delays and overcrowding, especially on the New Haven Line. £'\s per the agreement under which Metro-North operates the New Haven Line, President Giulietti noted that CDOT has approved the schedule changes relating to the New Haven Line and has asked Metro-North to implement further service enhancements in the fall schedule. President Giulietti reported on informal meetings he has been holding with customers during his first 100 days. The meetings provide President Giulietti and his senior staff wiili an opportunity to speak with Metro-North's customers and elected officials. President Giulietti has also visited wiili Metro-North employees at various facilities. He noted that the deadline for ilie lOa-Day Plan is June 11, and that many of ilie initiatives commenced in tl1e Plan period will continue beyond iliat date. A scorecard is posted on the internet to inform customers and stakeholders of Metro-North's progress. President Giulietti noted that a Metro-Norili has a lot of work ahead of it to create a culture in which safety is ilie most important priority, to fix what is broken ,viili ilie railroad's physical plant, procedures and organizational structure and to win back ilie confidence and trust of its customers and other stakeholders. President Giulietti and his senior team are committed to achieving these goals. President Giulietti announced iliat he has appointed iliree seasoned railroad veterans to top operational posts. Glen Hayden, who was a past head ofMetro-North's Maintenance of Way Department, has been appointed Vice President of Engineering. Michael Yaeger, who oversaw fleet maintenance, has been appointed Chief Mechanical Officer. Kevin O'Connor, who was responsible for day to day train operations and has experience in implementing C3RS, has been appointed Chief Transportation Officer. President Giulietti is confident that these experienced professionals will provide leadership needed to rebuild Metro-Norili's reputation for excellence by refocusing its attention on safety, reliability and customer service. Page 5 President Giulietti reported on the Mount Vernon Substation Upgrade, which began on April 18. The project, led by Tim McCarthy, head of Metro-North Capital Programs, will upgrade the power supply for the New Haven Line at Metro-North's Mount Vernon East substation to provide additional redundancy and increase capacity and will reconfigure existing controls and metering to take advantage of potential power savings. When completed, the project will enable Metro-North to use the regenerative braking technology on its M-8 rail cars to feed power back into the catenary system each time the cars go into braking mode. This excess electricity reduces Metro-North's overall power demand. In March, a similar upgrade was completed with CDOT, resulting in a doubling of capacity at the Cos Cob \'\1est substation. These substation improvements reduce the possibility of a full power outage. In the event of a full power outage, activating the tie and restoring regular train service through the area is estimated to take up to two hours. President Giulietti reported that total ridership is 1.7% lower year-to-date through March 2014 as compared to the comparable period of 2013. West-of-Hudson ridership increased 1.1 % in March 2014 as compared to the comparable period of2013.
Recommended publications
  • No Action Alternative Report

    No Action Alternative Report

    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
  • M7 Electric Multiple Unitанаnew York

    M7 Electric Multiple Unitанаnew York

    Electric Multiple Unit -M- 7 POWERCAR WITH TOILET ---10' 6' B END FEND I 3,200 mi , -: -" 0 C==- ~=0 :- CJCJ ~~[] CJCJCJCJCJCJ [] I D b 01 " ~) -1::1 1211-1/2 t~J ~~W ~~IL...I ~w -A'-'1~~~- I ~~ 309~mmt ~ 1 I~ 11 m 2205~16~m-! 591..1.6" mm --I I 1- -- 59°6" ° 4°8-1/2. , ~ 16,~:,60~m ~-- -;cl 10435mm ~ .-1 25.908 mm F END GENERAL DATA wheelchair locations 2 type of vehicle electric multiple unit passenger per car (seated) under design operator Metropolitan Transportation Authority passengers per car (standing) crush load under design Long Island Railroad order date May 1999 TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS quantity 113 power cars without toilet .power fed by third rail: 400-900 Vdc 113 power cars with toilet .auxiliary voltages: 230 Vac / 3 ph / 60 Hz train consist up to 14 cars 72 Vdc .AC traction motor: 265 hp (200 kW) DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHf Metric Imperial .dynamic and pneumatic (tread & disc) braking system length over coupler 25,908 mm 85'0" .coil spring primary suspension width over side sheets 3,200 mm 10'6" .air-bag secondary suspension rail to roof height 3,950 mm 12' II Y;" .stainless steel carbody rail to top of floor height I ,295 mm 51" .fabricated steel frame trucks rail to top of height 4,039 mm 13' 3" .automatic parking brake doorway width 1,270 mm 50" .forced-air ventilation doorway height 1,981 mm 6'6" .air-conditioning capacity of 18 tons floor to high ceiling height 2,261 mm 89" .electric strip heaters floor to low ceiling height 2,007 mm 79" .ADA compliant toilet room (8 car) wheel diameter 914 mm 36" .vacuum sewage system
  • Q:\Clients\Cities\NY, New Rochelle\Website\From Client\New Rochelle, NY\History\From Farms to Resorts, Estates and Home to New I

    Q:\Clients\Cities\NY, New Rochelle\Website\From Client\New Rochelle, NY\History\From Farms to Resorts, Estates and Home to New I

    From Farms to Resorts, Estates and Home to ew Immigrants New Rochelle in the 19 th Century An “arm of the Atlantic”, Long Island Sound stretches along the New York and Connecticut shorelines to the ocean. The western end of the estuary meets the Manhattan’s East River at Hell’s Gate. This waterway not only put New Rochelle on a trade route, it propelled the farming community into a resort destination. Sophisticated entrepreneurs and the advancement of steamboat travel ensured its success, as they banked on the wide open vistas, clean country air and unlimited aquatic activities just a boat ride from the increasingly crowded and sullied streets of Manhattan. The first passenger train of the New Haven Railroad steamed into town on New Year’s Day, 1849, and within a few decades rail service travel was suitable for daily travel. As a result, many of the former vacationers began planting roots in the community - the wealthy building summer estates; the middle class families purchasing homes in developing residential parks. The train also brought new immigrants to town – the New Rochelle station was the first stop on the New Haven line and a quick trip from the ferry dock off Ellis Island. By 1865, 30% of the town's population was foreign-born. Of New Rochelle's 3,968 residents, 800 were Irish and 200 were German. The depot became the catalyst for shops, newspaper offices, banks, tearooms, and other enterprises that evolved into a permanent and thriving “downtown” that was within the Village of New Rochelle (a 950 section that had been established in 1857.
  • Harlem River Waterfront

    Harlem River Waterfront

    Amtrak and Henry Hudson Bridges over the Harlem River, Spuyten Duvyil HARLEM BRONX RIVER WATERFRONT MANHATTAN Linking a River’s Renaissance to its Upland Neighborhoods Brownfied Opportunity Area Pre-Nomination Study prepared for the Bronx Council for Environmental Quality, the New York State Department of State and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. February 2007 Acknowledgements Steering Committee Dart Westphal, Bronx Council for Environmental Quality – Project Chair Colleen Alderson, NYC Department of Parks and Recreation Karen Argenti, Bronx Council for Environmental Quality Justin Bloom, Esq., Brownfield Attorney Paula Luria Caplan, Office of the Bronx Borough President Maria Luisa Cipriano, Partnership for Parks (Bronx) Curtis Cravens, NYS Department of State Jane Jackson, New York Restoration Project Rita Kessler, Bronx Community Board 7 Paul S. Mankiewicz, PhD, New York City Soil & Water Conservation District Walter Matystik, M.E.,J.D., Manhattan College Matt Mason, NYC Department of City Planning David Mojica, Bronx Community Board 4 Xavier Rodriguez, Bronx Community Board 5 Brian Sahd, New York Restoration Project Joseph Sanchez, Partnership for Parks James Sciales, Empire State Rowing Association Basil B. Seggos, Riverkeeper Michael Seliger, PhD, Bronx Community College Jane Sokolow LMNOP, Metro Forest Council Shino Tanikawa, New York City Soil and Water Conservation District Brad Trebach, Bronx Community Board 8 Daniel Walsh, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Project Sponsor Bronx Council for Environmental Quality Municipal Partner Office of Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrión, Jr. Fiscal Administrator Manhattan College Consultants Hilary Hinds Kitasei, Project Manager Karen Argenti, Community Participation Specialist Justin Bloom, Esq., Brownfield Attorney Paul S.
  • Historic Resources Evaluation Report

    Historic Resources Evaluation Report

    Archaeological and Historical Services, Inc. Historic Resources Evaluation Report Walk Bridge Replacement Project Norwalk, Connecticut State Project No. 0301-0176 Prepared for HNTB Corporation Boston, Massachusetts by Archaeological and Historical Services, Inc. Storrs, Connecticut for submission to The Connecticut Department of Transportation Authors: Bruce Clouette Marguerite Carnell Rodney Stacey Vairo August 2016 ABSTRACT AND MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The State of Connecticut, through the Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT), is planning the replacement of the 1896 Norwalk River railroad swing bridge in Norwalk, Connecticut, in order to improve the safety and reliability of service along the state’s busiest rail corridor. The project will receive funding from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), requiring consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office (CTSHPO) regarding possible impacts to significant historic and archaeological resources under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act. CTDOT is studying variants of the movable replacement bridge, including a vertical lift span option and a bascule span option. This report presents the results of research, field inspection, and analysis for the historic resources that may be affected by the project. Historic resources as considered herein are limited to above-ground (i.e., standing) properties: buildings, structures, objects, districts, landscapes, and sites that meet the criteria for listing in
  • Hars^®Rd Railroad, Shell Interlocking.Tower

    Hars^®Rd Railroad, Shell Interlocking.Tower

    NEW~Y&R£ ;NEF HAVEN S: HARS^®RD RAILROAD, HA-ER No. NY-299 SHELL INTERLOCKING.TOWER (¥ertork, NewtHlaven & iHartford Railroad, Signal Station 22) New Haven milepost 16, approximately 100 feet east of New Rbchelle Junction New Rochelle WestChester County New York PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC:AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia Support Office U.S. Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, P.A. 19106 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD 3- NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILRAOD, SHELL INTERLOCKING TOWER (New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad. Signal Station 22) HAERNo.NY-299 Location: New Haven Milepost 16, approximately 100 feet east of New Rochelle Junction, New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York UTM Coordinates: 18.602080.4529000 Mount Vernon, New York Quad. Date of Construction: 1909 Engineer: New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad ■ ■ * • Present Owner MTA Metro-North Railroad, New York, NY Present Use: Track and signal maintenance station Significance: Although the Shell Interlocking Tower no longer contains its original interlocking equipment, it is architecturally significant as representative of the type of structure built by the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad during the first decade of the twentieth century. The tower is significant for its association with an important period in the development of the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, and for its original embodiment of state of the art architectural design and electrical engineering technology. Project Information: This documentation was initiated in accordance with a 1994 Memorandum of Agreement between the Federal Railroad Administration and the New York State Historic Preservation Office as a mitigation measure prior to the tower's demolition to accommodate additional tracks as part of a railroad improvement project on the Northeast Corridor.
  • Acceso a La Estación Penn Station

    Acceso a La Estación Penn Station

    Acceso a la estación Penn Station Cuatro nuevas estaciones en East Bronx con servicio directo de Metro- North hacia la estación Penn Station, Westchester y Connecticut. Viajes más rápidos. Servicio expandido. El proyecto utilizará la actual línea Hell Gate de Amtrak para acceder a la estación Penn Station, lo que incrementará el Conexiones regionales. potencial de la infraestructura existente y a la vez minimizará el efecto en la comunidad circundante. También El servicio de Metro-North desde el Bronx, Westchester y dejará la línea Hell Gate en un buen estado de reparación Connecticut a la estación Penn Station y el lado oeste de y mejorará tanto la fiabilidad como la puntualidad para los Manhattan está a un paso de materializarse. El acceso a la pasajeros interurbanos. estación Penn Station respaldará la equidad, la conectividad regional y la fiabilidad al ofrecer una nueva opción de transporte público. Además de las nuevas estaciones, el proyecto convertirá el ferrocarril de 2 vías actual en un ferrocarril mayor de 4 vías con más de 19 millas de vías nuevas y rehabilitadas. El Con cuatro estaciones de ferrocarril nuevas en el East Bronx proyecto también incluye el reacondicionamiento de 4 accesibles para pasajeros según las disposiciones de la Ley puentes, la reconfiguración de la playa de New Rochelle de para Estadounidenses con Discapacidades y mejoras Metro-North, 4 enclavamientos nuevos y 1 enclavamiento significativas en la infraestructura ferroviaria, el acceso de reconfigurado, 5 subestaciones nuevas y 2 mejoradas, y Penn Station respaldará la economía local y atraerá el talento modernizaciones de la infraestructura de señalización, regional al aumentar la accesibilidad a barrios de pocos energía y comunicación.
  • A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood

    A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood

    A Vision for New Rochelle Plan for Revitalizing the City Park Neighborhood Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation Columbia University May 2001 1 Contents 1. Contents 2 2. Executive Summary 4 3. Introduction 6 4. Acknowledgements 8 5. Background Information and Existing Conditions 9 5.1Westchester Background 5.1.1 History of Westchester 9 5.1.2 Business, Industry and Land Use 11 5.2 New Rochelle Background 5.2.1 History of New Rochelle 14 5.2.2 Socioeconomic and Demographic Profilbe 16 5.2.3 New Rochelle: Business, Revenues, and Revenue Constraints 19 5.2.4 Economic Development 22 5.2.5 Land Use 24 5.2.6 Housing 25 5.2.7 Schools 26 5.3 City Park Background 5.3.1 History of City Park 27 5.3.2 Neighborhood Character 31 5.3.3 Land Use and Zoning 33 5.3.4 Business and Industry 36 5.3.5 MacLeay Apartments 37 5.3.6 Environmental Assessment 38 5.4 IKEA 43 5.4.1 Big Box Retail 47 6. Findings and Recommendations 6.1 Argument for Light Industry 48 6.1.1 Social Capital 49 6.1.2 State and Federal Aid 50 6.1.3 Locational Advantages 50 6.1.4 Demand for Industrial Space in Westchester 50 6.1.5 Industry Foci 52 6.1.6 Long Range Impact of Reinforcing Light Industry : 53 Input-Output Analysis of Development Impacts on Study Area 6.2 Zoning and Infrastructure Recommendation 57 6.2.1 Infrastructure Improvements 57 6.2.2 Zoning and Design Recommendations 62 6.3 Local Development Corporation 6.3.1 Mission, Goals and Function 65 2 6.3.2 Details about Formation 65 6.3.3 Potential Funding Sources 67 6.3.4 Land Acquisition 68 6.3.5 Benefits of the Local Development Corporation 68 7.
  • Agenda Connecticut Public Transportation Commission

    Agenda Connecticut Public Transportation Commission

    AGENDA CONNECTICUT PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING August 2, 2007 - 1:30 PM Housatonic Area Regional Transit 62 Federal Road, Danbury Second Floor Conference Room 1. Approval of the July 12, 2007 meeting minutes 2. Featured Speaker: Eric Bergstraesser, Executive Director, Housatonic Area Reg. Transit 3. Comments from the public 4. Comments from operating entities 5. Chairman’s report 6. Old business 7. New business Connecticut Public Transportation Commission Minutes of July 12, 2007 Legislative Office Building, Conference Room 1B Hartford, Connecticut Attendance: Members: Tom Cheeseman, Kevin Maloney, Morton Katz, Russell St. John, Terry Hall, Linda Blair, Richard Schreiner, Richard Carpenter, Richard Sunderhauf, John Zelinsky. Ex-officio members: Susan Simmat, Fred Riese. ConnDOT staff: Albert Martin, Carmine Trotta, Eugene Colonese, Riccardo Almeida, Dennis King. Guests: Brooke Hoberman, Stephen Troster. Chairman Cheeseman opened the meeting at 1:30 pm and welcomed Mort Katz who made his return from his surgery in April. The minutes of the meeting of June 7 were approved with Linda Blair’s correction that the Amtrak website had shown the last returning train from Boston at 1:40 pm, not 1:45 pm. Dick Carpenter noted that he still had not received a reply from ConnDOT as to the clearance requirements necessary to run well cars on the New Haven Line. Featured Speaker Carmine Trotta, Assistant Director of Intermodal Planning at ConnDOT, provided a summary of the myriad of studies and planning activities currently underway in the Office of Intermodal Planning. His list of projects in outline form is as follows: • Danbury Branch Electrification Study: Phase I study of a long list of alternatives has been completed.
  • City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)

    City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)

    City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Borou Block Lot Address Parcel Name gh 1 2 1 4 SOUTH STREET SI FERRY TERMINAL 1 2 2 10 SOUTH STREET BATTERY MARITIME BLDG 1 2 3 MARGINAL STREET MTA SUBSTATION 1 2 23 1 PIER 6 PIER 6 1 3 1 10 BATTERY PARK BATTERY PARK 1 3 2 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 3 3 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 6 1 24 SOUTH STREET VIETNAM VETERANS PLAZA 1 10 14 33 WHITEHALL STREET 1 12 28 WHITEHALL STREET BOWLING GREEN PARK 1 16 1 22 BATTERY PLACE PIER A / MARINE UNIT #1 1 16 3 401 SOUTH END AVENUE BATTERY PARK CITY STREETS 1 16 12 MARGINAL STREET BATTERY PARK CITY Page 1 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Agency Current Uses Number Structures DOT;DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;NO 2 USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;LONG-TERM 1 AGREEMENT;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS NO USE-NON RES STRC;TRANSIT 1 SUBSTATION DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- 1 DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;FINAL COMMITMNT-DISP PARKS PARK 6 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 0 SANIT OFFICE 1 PARKS PARK 0 DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;IN USE- 1 TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DOT PARK;ROAD/HIGHWAY 10 PARKS IN USE-TENANTED;SHORT-TERM 0 Page 2 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Land Use Category Postcode Police Prct
  • Patient and Visitor Guide During Your Stay Welcome

    Patient and Visitor Guide During Your Stay Welcome

    NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Patient and Visitor Guide During Your Stay Welcome Welcome to NewYork-Presbyterian/The Allen Hospital. Here you will find a staff dedicated to always providing the highest quality, most compassionate care and service to each and every one of our patients in a warm and friendly environment. To help you and your family while you are here in the Hospital, we have developed this During Your Stay Guide. It includes information about services and amenities that are available to make you as comfortable as possible. It also provides important information about your health care team and what you and your family need to know to prepare for going home. We want you to be an active participant in your own care, and you will find that our staff members encourage you to ask questions and share any concerns that you or your family might have. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital is one of the most comprehensive academic medical centers in the world, with leading specialists in every field of medicine. We are very proud of the outstanding care we provide to patients and families. Most importantly, we are proud of our staff’s commitment to taking great care of you and your loved ones. At NewYork-Presbyterian, We Put Patients First. So if you have any questions or if there is anything we can do to ease your stay, don’t hesitate to talk to your doctor or any member of your care team. Thank you for the privilege of caring for you. Very truly yours, Steven J. Corwin, M.D.
  • Society for Industrial Archeologyทท New England Chapters

    Society for Industrial Archeologyทท New England Chapters

    Society for Industrial Archeology·· New England Chapters VOLUME23 NUMBER 1 2003 CONTENTS NNEC-SIA Spring 2003 Meeting and Field Tour NNEC-SIA Spring 2003 Meeting and Field Tour Southern New England Chapter The spring meeting and field tour of the Northern New England President's Conunents 2 Northern New England Chapter Chapter, Society for Industrial Archeology, will be held on Saturday, May 10, President's Conunents 3 beginning at 9:30a.m. (if heavy rain on Saturday, then Sunday, May 11). The Field Site Committee Formed for the Northern sites visited will be six in number: three railroad bridges, the remnants of a New England Chapter 3 turntable and locomotive house, a woolen mill, and a granite quarry. From Square Dancing to Folk Engineering: Attendees should arrive at the north end of the Sarah Mildred Long or By­ A Visit to Thrall Hall 3 Pass U.S. 1 bridge spanning the Piscataqua River between Portsmouth, NH, Adapting to a Changing Steel Economy: and Kittery, ME, no later than 9:40 a.m. on May 10. Directions sent by email A Visit to Berlin Steel 4 Discoveries at the Haverhill-Bath and post will be sufficiently detailed to permit late arrivals to catch the con­ Covered Bridge 4 voy already heading northwest to the other sites. The registration fee for this History of the New York, New Haven and Hartford tour is $5 per person. Railroad's Central Avenue Interlocking Tower 5 Directions from the south: Proceed on I-95 North (New Hampshire Railroad Roundhouse Archaeology 17 Tpke) to Exit 5, leading to the Portsmouth Traffic Circle.