Cromwelliana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cromwelliana Cromwelliana The Journal of The Cromwell Association 2015 The Cromwell Association President: Professor PETER GAUNT, PhD, FRHistS Vice Presidents: Rt Hon the LORD NASEBY, PC Rt Hon FRANK DOBSON, MP Rt Hon STEPHEN DORRELL, MP Professor JOHN MORRILL, DPhil, FBA, FRHistS Professor BLAIR WORDEN, FBA Dr STEPHEN K. ROBERTS, PhD, FSA, FRHistS PAT BARNES Chairman: Dr PATRICK LITTLE, PhD, FRHistS Honorary Secretary: JOHN NEWLAND Honorary Treasurer: GEOFFREY BUSH Membership Officer PAUL ROBBINS The Cromwell Association was formed in 1937 and is a registered charity (reg no. 1132954). The purpose of the Association is to advance the education of the public in both the life and legacy of Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658), politician, soldier and statesman, and the wider history of the seventeenth century. The Association seeks to progress its aims in the following ways: campaigns for the preservation and conservation of buildings and sites relevant to Cromwell commissions, on behalf of the Association, or in collaboration with others, plaques, panels and monuments at sites associated with Cromwell supports and encourages the Cromwell Museum and Cromwell Collection in Huntingdon run by Cambridgeshire County Council provides, within the competence of the Association, advice to the media on all matters relating to the period encourages interest in the period in all phases of formal education by the publication of reading lists, information and teachers’ guidance publishes news and information about the period, including an annual journal and regular newsletters organises an annual service, day schools, conferences, lectures, exhibitions and other educational events provides a web-based resource for researchers in the period including school students, genealogists and interested parties offers, from time to time grants, awards and prizes to individuals and organisations working towards the objectives stated above. Editor of Cromwelliana: Dr MAXINE FORSHAW, BSc, PhD www.olivercromwell.org. CROMWELLIANA 2015 Series III No 4 Editor: Dr Maxine Forshaw CONTENTS Editor’s Note 3 Cromwell Day Address (September 2014) 5 Oliver Cromwell and his Public By Prof Jason Peacey Cromwell Collection Lecture (November 2012) 19 Facts, Lies and Stereotypes – the background to the collections of the Cromwell Museum By John Goldsmith Cromwell Association AGM Address (April 2014) 36 Cromwell’s Generalship and the Conquest of Scotland 1650 - 1651 By Prof Malcolm Wanklyn Cromwell Study Day (October 2014) 51 ‘Cromwell’s whelps’: the death of the New Model Army By Dr David Appleby Cromwell Study Day (October 2014) 66 ‘…looked on as a wonder, that never beheld his enemies in the face but returned from them crowned always with renown and honour…’: Cromwell’s contribution to Parliament’s Military Victories, 1642 - 1651 By Prof Peter Gaunt ‘this little Judgement which I have through my industry 94 obtained unto, In Forraigne Countries’: Philip Skippon and the lessons learnt from contintental conflicts in the English Civil War. By Dr Ismini Pells CONTENTS (cont’d) Cromwellian Britain XXV 117 Putney, Greater London By Serrie Meakins Writings and Sources XVII 123 Minor Operations in the English Civil War By Prof Peter Gaunt Book Reviews 129 The English Civil War : A Military History by Peter Gaunt The English Civil Wars : A Beginner’s Guide by Patrick Little The Social World of Early Modern Westminster Abbey, Court and Community, 1525-1640 by Julia Merritt Westminster 1640-60 : A Royal City in a Time of Revolution by Julia Merritt The Last Ironsides : The English Expedition to Portugal, 1662-1668 by Jonathon Riley Reviews by Alan Turton, Nicola Turton, Dr Patrick Little and Dr Miranda Malins Obituary : Ivan Roots 137 By Dr Stephen Roberts Bibliography of Books 141 By Dr David Smith Bibliography of Journals 145 By Prof Peter Gaunt ISBN 0-905729-26-9 EDITOR’S NOTE This edition of Cromwelliana has a distinctly military theme. We have two papers originally presented at the Association’s study day in October 2014 by Peter Gaunt and David Appleby covering Cromwell’s contribution to Parliament’s military victories, and the fate of the New Model Army after the Restoration. In addition, related subjects include a study of Philip Skippon and the lessons he learnt from continental conflicts prior to the English civil war, and an account of Cromwell’s generalship and the conquest of Scotland 1650–51. In February we were very sorry to lose one of our most valued Cromwellian historians of recent times – Ivan Roots. He was a committed supporter and previous president of the Association; I am grateful to Stephen Roberts who has provided a fitting tribute to Ivan for this publication. If you are interested in contributing to future issues of the journal, please contact the Cromwell Association via the email address: [email protected] My thanks to all the contributors for their input to this edition. Cover image: Olivarus Britannicus heros. Print by William Faithorne, first published in Ludovici de Gand’s panegyric Parallelum Olivae, 1656. Courtesy of The Cromwell Museum, Huntingdon. 3 4 CROMWELL AND HIS PUBLIC By Prof Jason Peacey As anyone who has attended an event such as the Cromwell Day commemoration in recent years will attest, heightened security measures surrounding our Parliament provide very visible testimony to what many regard as the remoteness of modern politicians. This security is, of course, understandable given the fear of terrorist attacks, and yet it is hard to deny that the concrete barriers, armed police and airport-style security also send out a powerful message: the Houses of Parliament are a somewhat intimidating and unapproachable place. Security, in other words, comes at a price, just as the surveillance powers which some consider to be necessary to prevent terror plots inevitably impact on privacy and civil liberties. Such points are not necessarily intended to be politically loaded; rather they are intended to make the point that issues like terrorism provoke questions about how societies strike an appropriate balance between security, on the one hand, and liberty, privacy and an accessible political system on the other. That such things are worthy of debate seems to be clear from the fact that the physical remoteness of our representatives is, for some at least, a matter of serious concern. Indeed, it is hard not to think that there is a connection between the perceived insularity and inaccessibility of MPs – or perhaps even the sense that the Westminster bubble is somewhat easier to penetrate by lobbyists than by ordinary members of the public – and the much commented upon phenomena of voter apathy, public disgruntlement with political parties and general cynicism regarding the political system, not least in the wake of the expenses scandal. Like all of the most interesting and troubling modern issues, of course, there is scope for historians to reflect on what might usefully be gleaned from the past, and if it can justifiably be argued that we have not yet had a satisfactory debate about the trade-off between security and political accessibility in our own time, then there is value in focusing our attention on a period in the past when our ancestors grappled with such issues much more directly. My suggestion, therefore, is that it is worthwhile examining Cromwell’s age, and the parliaments of the mid-seventeenth century, for insights about how such a debate might be conducted. This is possible, in fact, because historians of political culture in the seventeenth century have become increasingly fascinated by the ways in which politicians and governments interacted with their publics, and engaged in what we would now call ‘public relations’ and 5 CROMWELL AND HIS PUBLIC ‘spin’. As a result, we have discovered that the political elite in early modern Britain thought about such things in fairly sophisticated ways, in terms of everything from royal progresses and civic pageantry to the management and manipulation of the media, not least in relation to the reputations of individual grandees, and the risks associated with ‘popularity’.1 This makes it possible to reach some fascinating conclusions regarding the changes that took place in political culture during the Tudor and Stuart age, and particularly during the civil wars and interregnum, and the aim of this piece is to suggest that this picture can also be informed by looking closely at Cromwell’s attitudes and behaviour, both before and during his time as lord protector. The result will hopefully be an instructive means of thinking about the kinds of ways in which it might be possible to have a productive debate about the political culture that we would like to foster in the twenty- first century. I In 1962, the German sociologist, Jürgen Habermas, published what was to become an extraordinarily controversial but influential book, entitled The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. His main purpose was to think about the media and communication in the twentieth century, but in critiquing what he considered to be the unfortunate effects of modern mass media, Habermas also discussed the past, and specifically the emergence of what he termed a ‘public sphere’ in England after 1695. This was marked, he believed, by a free press, and it involved the generation of a free space – between the private individual and the state – in which it was possible to conduct political discourse that was rational and commercial, and mostly free from government interference, at least amongst the bourgeoisie (or ‘middling sort’). This book, together with Elizabeth Eisenstein’s equally provocative account of The Printing Press as an Agent of Change (1979), has played a huge role in helping to provide structure for a wealth of scholarship on print culture and the ‘print revolution’ – or the ‘unacknowledged revolution’ in Eisenstein’s phrase – of the early modern period.2 Crucially, such scholarship has involved thinking about the ways in which the development of printing, and more specifically the kinds of printed texts that are likely to have had most ‘reach’, in terms of being accessible to a general audience, influenced political culture, and perhaps even political events.
Recommended publications
  • Philip Skippon's Description of Florence (1664)
    PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) in: PHILIP SKIPPON: An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low-Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English (...), second edition, volume VI (London 1746) edited with an Introduction by MARGARET DALY DAVIS FONTES 51 [12 July 2009] Zitierfähige URL: http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/artdok/volltexte/2010/1216/ urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-artdok-12163 1 Philip Skippon, An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English in six volumes with a general preface giving an account of the progress of navigation from its beginning, London: Printed by assignment from Messrs. Churchill for Henry Lintot; and John Osborn, at the Golden-Bell in Pater-noster Row, Vol. VI, 1746, pp. 375-749. 2 CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION: PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) 24 THE FULL TEXT OF PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY 48 PHILIP SKIPPON, JOHN RAY, FRANCIS WILLUGHBY, NATHANIEL BACON 50 PAGE FACSIMILES 3 INTRODUCTION: PHILIP SKIPPON’S DESCRIPTION OF FLORENCE (1664) by Margaret Daly Davis Philip Skippon, An account of a journey made thro’ part of the Low-Countries, Germany, Italy and France, in: A collection of voyages and travels, some now printed from original manuscripts, others now first published in English (...), [London: Printed by assignment from Messrs. Churchill], 2nd ed., vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Being a Thesis Submitted for the Degree Of
    The tJni'ers1ty of Sheffield Depaz'tient of Uistory YORKSRIRB POLITICS, 1658 - 1688 being a ThesIs submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by CIthJUL IARGARRT KKI August, 1990 For my parents N One of my greater refreshments is to reflect our friendship. "* * Sir Henry Goodricke to Sir Sohn Reresby, n.d., Kxbr. 1/99. COff TENTS Ackn owl edgements I Summary ii Abbreviations iii p Introduction 1 Chapter One : Richard Cromwell, Breakdown and the 21 Restoration of Monarchy: September 1658 - May 1660 Chapter Two : Towards Settlement: 1660 - 1667 63 Chapter Three Loyalty and Opposition: 1668 - 1678 119 Chapter Four : Crisis and Re-adjustment: 1679 - 1685 191 Chapter Five : James II and Breakdown: 1685 - 1688 301 Conclusion 382 Appendix: Yorkshire )fembers of the Coir,ons 393 1679-1681 lotes 396 Bibliography 469 -i- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Research for this thesis was supported by a grant from the Department of Education and Science. I am grateful to the University of Sheffield, particularly the History Department, for the use of their facilities during my time as a post-graduate student there. Professor Anthony Fletcher has been constantly encouraging and supportive, as well as a great friend, since I began the research under his supervision. I am indebted to him for continuing to supervise my work even after he left Sheffield to take a Chair at Durham University. Following Anthony's departure from Sheffield, Professor Patrick Collinson and Dr Mark Greengrass kindly became my surrogate supervisors. Members of Sheffield History Department's Early Modern Seminar Group were a source of encouragement in the early days of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS, SOCIETY and CIVIL WAR in WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History
    Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, 162.0-1660 Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History Series editors ANTHONY FLETCHER Professor of History, University of Durham JOHN GUY Reader in British History, University of Bristol and JOHN MORRILL Lecturer in History, University of Cambridge, and Fellow and Tutor of Selwyn College This is a new series of monographs and studies covering many aspects of the history of the British Isles between the late fifteenth century and the early eighteenth century. It will include the work of established scholars and pioneering work by a new generation of scholars. It will include both reviews and revisions of major topics and books which open up new historical terrain or which reveal startling new perspectives on familiar subjects. It is envisaged that all the volumes will set detailed research into broader perspectives and the books are intended for the use of students as well as of their teachers. Titles in the series The Common Peace: Participation and the Criminal Law in Seventeenth-Century England CYNTHIA B. HERRUP Politics, Society and Civil War in Warwickshire, 1620—1660 ANN HUGHES London Crowds in the Reign of Charles II: Propaganda and Politics from the Restoration to the Exclusion Crisis TIM HARRIS Criticism and Compliment: The Politics of Literature in the Reign of Charles I KEVIN SHARPE Central Government and the Localities: Hampshire 1649-1689 ANDREW COLEBY POLITICS, SOCIETY AND CIVIL WAR IN WARWICKSHIRE, i620-1660 ANN HUGHES Lecturer in History, University of Manchester The right of the University of Cambridge to print and sell all manner of books was granted by Henry VIII in 1534.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “Piecing Together Cambridgeshire’S Past
    Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Cambridgeshire Archaeology JIGSAW “piecing together Cambridgeshire’s Past Final Report April 2007 Prepared By The Market Research Group (MRG), Bournemouth University, On Behalf Of Cambridgeshire County Council www.themarketresearchgroup.co.uk Page a Cambridgeshire County Council JIGSAW Project Final report 2007 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................ 1 1.0: Background .............................................................................. 3 1.1: The Market Research Group (MRG)........................................ 3 1.2: Cambridgeshire County Council .............................................. 4 2.0: Research Aims & Objectives................................................... 6 3.0: Outline Methodology................................................................ 8 3.1: Audience Research - Existing Users ....................................... 8 3.2: Audience Research - Potential Users ...................................... 9 3.3: Audience Research – JIGSAW Focus Groups ...................... 11 4.0: Findings –Cambridgeshire Archaeology users results...... 12 5.0: Findings – Potential users or non user survey ................... 39 6.0: Findings – Castle celebration event (non users) ................ 79 7.0: Findings - Schools – qualitative results............................. 101 8.0: Findings – Focus group results.......................................... 116 8.1: Users and non users focus groups
    [Show full text]
  • Huntingdon Town Trail
    8 3 28 6 7 30 Huntingdon Town Trail A brief history of Huntingdon Huntingdon is situated on Ermine Street, a Roman road from London to York, where it crosses England’s third longest river, Huntingdon First the Great Ouse. Godmanchester, just south of the river, was the Tel 01480 450250 major settlement, with the Roman name of Durovigutum, while www.huntingdonfirst.co.uk l Huntingdon had a villa that overlooked Portholme meadow. i The name Huntingdon is derived from the Old English a With generous support in both time and grant funding from r ‘Huntedun’, meaning Hunta’s Hill. Edward the Elder, a Saxon T king, captured Huntingdon from the Danish Vikings about AD Huntingdon Town Council Tel 01480 388688 921, and it became the county town of Huntingdonshire. n www.huntingdontown.gov.uk By 1066 Huntingdon was a Royal Borough with a mint which w The Cromwell Museum issued its own coinage. A Royal Charter was granted in 1205. o Tel 01480 375830 By the 13th century the town was prosperous with about 15 www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/cromwell • www.olivercromwell.org T churches, three monasteries and three hospitals. Following Huntingdon & Godmanchester Civic Society n the Black Death of 1348-9 and the decline of trade on the www.civicvoice.org.uk/society/huntingdon-godmanchester-civic-society river, the town’s population decreased drastically. o and a team of expert historians, led by David Hufford. Hinchingbrooke Priory closed in 1536, passed to the d Cromwell family, then became Hinchingbrooke House, The following websites also provide further information about g the home of the Earls of Sandwich.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntingdon in Bloom Portfolio 2016
    Huntingdon In Bloom Portfolio 2016 1 INDEX TO PORTFOLIO Front Cover – Community planting of raised rose garden in Coneygear Park to celebrate Her Majesty The Queen’s 90th Birthday on 21st April 2016. 2. Index to portfolio 3. Welcome to Huntingdon In Bloom 2016 4. Route map 5. Judging Itinerary 6. Judging Itinerary continued 7. Huntingdon In Bloom Committee 8. Huntingdon In Bloom example agenda and calendar 9. Huntingdon In Bloom calendar and Launch Event Section A – Horticultural Achievement 10. A1 Impact 11. A2 Horticultural Practice and A3 Residential and Community Gardening 12. A4 Business and Premises 13. A5 Green Spaces 14. Planting Efforts 15. Planting Efforts 16. Best Kept Front Garden Competition Winners 17. Best Kept Front Garden Competition Entries 18. Themed Floral Displays Section B – Environmental Responsibility 19. Waterless Toilets at Huntingdon’s Allotment Sites 20. B1 Conservation and Biodiversity and B2 Resource Management 21. B3 Local Heritage 22. B4 Local Environmental Quality 23. B5 Pride of Place 24. Rainbows Huntingdon In Bloom Badge Award 25. Ringshill Care Home Allotment and Hunters Down Care Home Communal Gardens Section C – Community Participation 26. C1 Development and continuity, C2 Communication and Education and C3 Community Involvement 27. C4 Year round involvement and C5 Funding and Support 28. Press Coverage 29. Press Coverage 30. Funding and Sponsors 2 Welcome to Huntingdon in Bloom 2016 Introduction Huntingdon was thrilled to be a part of Anglia In Bloom in 2015 and delighted to achieve a Silver Award for the town after three years out of the campaign. 2015’s entry was spent mainly on meeting with local groups, schools, businesses and charities to re-introduce the concept of ‘In Bloom’ and to re-build partnerships in the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Katherine Philips and the Discourse of Virtue
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Katherine Philips and the Discourse of Virtue Tracy J. Byrne Thesis submitted for the degree of Ph.D. University of Glasgow Department of English Literature March 2002 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived therefrom, may be published without the author's prior written consent. ProQuest Number: 10647853 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Claypoles of Northborough in America
    121 THE CLAYPOLES OF NORTHBOROUGH IN AMERICA In a previous issue of NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PAST AND PRESENT (Vol. I, No. 4, page 23), Mr. Urwick Smith gave an account ofJohn Claypole, son-in-law of Oliver Cromwell and his Master of the Horse. He also described other members of the family of the Claypoles of N orthborough. Originally, a yeoman family from Kings Cliffe, the Claypoles increased in prosperity and status in the reign of Elizabeth I, acquiring the Manor of Northborough and a coat of arms shortly afterwards. A brief period of national prominence followed the marriage of John Claypole, son of the Puritan John Claypole, who sat as member for Northamptonshire in one of Cromwell's Parliaments. Naturally this came to an end at the Restoration of Charles II, but John Claypole was not deprived of his estates and was enabled to give his mother-in-law, Oliver Cromwell's widow, asylum at Northborough, where she died. As mentioned by Mr. Urwick Smith, James Claypole, who turned Quaker, and Norton Claypole (brothers of Cromwell's son-in-law), both went to America and in this article Mrs. Marion Balderston traces in some detail what happened to them there. WHAT happened to the prolific Claypole family of Northborough which, during the days of the Commonwealth, rose to be one of the most important families of Northamptonshire? John Claypole, who was Cromwell's son-in-law, carried it to the peak of its political importance, spent its revenues, mortgaged and finally sold its property; his twelve brothers and sisters scattered, some even as far as the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • Rump Ballads and Official Propaganda (1660-1663)
    Ezra’s Archives | 35 A Rhetorical Convergence: Rump Ballads and Official Propaganda (1660-1663) Benjamin Cohen In October 1917, following the defeat of King Charles I in the English Civil War (1642-1649) and his execution, a series of republican regimes ruled England. In 1653 Oliver Cromwell’s Protectorate regime overthrew the Rump Parliament and governed England until his death in 1659. Cromwell’s regime proved fairly stable during its six year existence despite his ruling largely through the powerful New Model Army. However, the Protectorate’s rapid collapse after Cromwell’s death revealed its limited durability. England experienced a period of prolonged political instability between the collapse of the Protectorate and the restoration of monarchy. Fears of political and social anarchy ultimately brought about the restoration of monarchy under Charles I’s son and heir, Charles II in May 1660. The turmoil began when the Rump Parliament (previously ascendant in 1649-1653) seized power from Oliver Cromwell’s ineffectual son and successor, Richard, in spring 1659. England’s politically powerful army toppled the regime in October, before the Rump returned to power in December 1659. Ultimately, the Rump was once again deposed at the hands of General George Monck in February 1660, beginning a chain of events leading to the Restoration.1 In the following months Monck pragmatically maneuvered England toward a restoration and a political 1 The Rump Parliament refers to the Parliament whose membership was composed of those Parliamentarians that remained following the expulsion of members unwilling to vote in favor of executing Charles I and establishing a commonwealth (republic) in 1649.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Governor John Blackwell: His Life in England and Ireland OHN BLACKWELL is best known to American readers as an early governor of Pennsylvania, the most recent account of his J governorship having been published in this Magazine in 1950. Little, however, has been written about his services to the Common- wealth government, first as one of Oliver Cromwell's trusted cavalry officers and, subsequently, as his Treasurer at War, a position of considerable importance and responsibility.1 John Blackwell was born in 1624,2 the eldest son of John Black- well, Sr., who exercised considerable influence on his son's upbringing and activities. John Blackwell, Sr., Grocer to King Charles I, was a wealthy London merchant who lived in the City and had a country house at Mortlake, on the outskirts of London.3 In 1640, when the 1 Nicholas B. Wainwright, "Governor John Blackwell," The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography (PMHB), LXXIV (1950), 457-472.I am indebted to Professor Wallace Notestein for advice and suggestions. 2 John Blackwell, Jr., was born Mar. 8, 1624. Miscellanea Heraldica et Genealogica, New Series, I (London, 1874), 177. 3 John Blackwell, Sr., was born at Watford, Herts., Aug. 25, 1594. He married his first wife Juliana (Gillian) in 1621; she died in 1640, and was buried at St. Thomas the Apostle, London, having borne him ten children. On Mar. 9, 1642, he married Martha Smithsby, by whom he had eight children. Ibid.y 177-178. For Blackwell arms, see J. Foster, ed., Grantees 121 122, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter VIII Witchcraft As Ma/Efice: Witchcraft Case Studies, the Third Phase of the Welsh Antidote to Witchcraft
    251. Chapter VIII Witchcraft as Ma/efice: Witchcraft Case Studies, The Third Phase of The Welsh Antidote to Witchcraft. Witchcraft as rna/efice cases were concerned specifically with the practice of witchcraft, cases in which a woman was brought to court charged with being a witch, accused of practising rna/efice or premeditated harm. The woman was not bringing a slander case against another. She herself was being brought to court by others who were accusing her of being a witch. Witchcraft as rna/efice cases in early modem Wales were completely different from those witchcraft as words cases lodged in the Courts of Great Sessions, even though they were often in the same county, at a similar time and heard before the same justices of the peace. The main purpose of this chapter is to present case studies of witchcraft as ma/efice trials from the various court circuits in Wales. Witchcraft as rna/efice cases in Wales reflect the general type of early modern witchcraft cases found in other areas of Britain, Europe and America, those with which witchcraft historiography is largely concerned. The few Welsh cases are the only cases where a woman was being accused of witchcraft practices. Given the profound belief system surrounding witches and witchcraft in early modern Wales, the minute number of these cases raises some interesting historical questions about attitudes to witches and ways of dealing with witchcraft. The records of the Courts of Great Sessions1 for Wales contain very few witchcraft as rna/efice cases, sometimes only one per county. The actual number, however, does not detract from the importance of these cases in providing a greater understanding of witchcraft typology for early modern Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • OLIVER CROMWELL: CHANGE and CONTINUITY a Master's Thesis Presented to the School of Graduate Studies Department Ofhistory Indian
    OLIVER CROMWELL: CHANGE AND CONTINUITY A Master's Thesis Presented to The School of Graduate Studies Department ofHistory Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree by Kari L. Ellis May2002 INDIANA STATE UM!VERSITY UBRARY ll APPROVAL SHEET The thesis ofKari L. Ellis, Contribution to the School of Graduate Studies, Indiana State University, Series I, Number 2166, under the title Oliver Cromwell: Change and Continuity is approved as partial fulfillment of the Master of Arts Degree in the amount of six semester hours of graduate credit. Committee Chairperson r 111 ABSTRACT This study looks at the life of Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector ofEngland, in an effort to clarify the diverse and conflicting interpretations resulting from a lack of agreement between those who are biased for and against the Lord Protector. The purpose of the study of this conflicting information is not to settle whether Cromwell was a good figure or bad, but to define more clearly his time. Cromwell, clarified, creates a broader understanding of the seventeenth century Englishman. An introduction develops a brief summarization of Pre-Reformation Europe, the forces which brought changes, Reformation Europe and the Post-Reformation era in which Cromwell lived. The non-Cromwellian periods were included to develop a broader picture for the reader of the atmosphere into which Cromwell emerged. The study concentrates on six key points of conflict within the lifetime of Cromwell and discussion ofthose conflicts through use of periods or roles within his life. Cromwell's changeable nature does not lend itselfto a static, one-dimensional interpretation, but rather to one that attempts to incorporate the normal fluctuations of human nature and the continuity of change.
    [Show full text]