DOCSLIB.ORG

Neutron Supermirror Manufacturing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neutron Supermirror Manufacturing Neutron supermirror manufacturing Yutaka YAMAGATA Team Leader, Ultra High Precision Optics Technology Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Photonics (RAP), RIKEN NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 1 2015 Aug. 27-28 Outline • Neutron optics development at RIKEN – Neutron mirror using metallic substrate – Basic developments – Small ellipsoidal mirror – Segmented elliptic mirror for J-PARC BL-16 • Focusing Optics development for NNbar at ESS – Outline of optics – A manufacturing cost estimation – Reducing the cost and time – Summary NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 2 2015 Aug. 27-28 Neutron Focusing Mirror development We have demonstrated the feasibility of focusing •Manufacturing Process of such ellipsoidal neutron small neutron scattering (mf-SANS) mirror with glass material is time-consuming task instrument at JRR-3. as it requires GRINDING process. Lower precision in profile and roughness Difficult to manufacture Large Scale Optics 3.5Qc Ellipsoidal Supermirror By using metallic substrate ( aluminum alloy etc.) manufacturing efficiency will be much better as it can be done with precision CUTTING process. In addition, handling easiness, robustness, radiation resistant UPC (13h) Polished (24h) □ 50 mm 900mm ellipsoidal neutron 13 mm Peak-Valley 29.86 nm Peak-Valley 7.72 nm Focusing mirror. height height mf-SANS @ JRR-3 Roughness 4.14 nm Roughness 0.78 nm by Prof. Furusaka (Hokkaido Univ.) NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 3 2015 Aug. 27-28 metallic substrate mirror • Advantages – Robust ductile material – Easier mechanical handling • Screw holes, positioning pins, fixture tabs can be used – Resistant to radiation and heat shock • Problem – Surface roughness limitation (polycrystalline structure) • Amorphous Ni-P plating solve this problem NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 4 2015 Aug. 27-28 Manufacturing Process ①Material preparation by ① end-mill Ra~several conventional milling micrometer ②Ｎｉ－Ｐ Plating ②③ single crystal Ra~serveral diamond cutting tens of nanometer ③ tool Ultraprecision cutting 10nm NiP-coated ④Polishing Pick-feed Shaper 100μm -10 nm Peak-Valley 29.86 nm Polishing pad Cutting for free-form height curved surface Roughness 4.14 nm Flat sample ④ □ 50 mm 10nm Abrasive Slurry Ra ~several -10 nm 100 μm 13 mm Angstromes Peak-Valley 3.52 nm height NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 5 Roughness 0.40 nm 5 2015 Aug. 27-28 Reflectivity test of flat test pieces Flat sample 10nm □ 50 mm -10 nm 100 μm Tested at Peak-Valley 3.52 nm Hokkaido height University Roughness 0.40 nm 13 mm Neutron Source (HUNS) 1 1 0.1 0.1 0.01 I s 0.01 p Tested at KUR c 0.001 y t i s n e t 4 CN-3 n 0.001 i 10 Neutron 5 4 10 reflectometer 10 50 100 150 200 250 y 0.45mm ch 10 5 50 100 150 200 250 position channel 0.45 mm ch Diffuse scattering lower than 5Qc monochromatic coating On NiP substrate 10^-3.5 order ( noise limit) NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 6 2015 Aug. 27-28 Manufacturing of small ellipsoidal mirror Z 100mm Y X Cutting conditions 3-axis simultaneous machining Machining method Shaper cutting Machine NAGASEi NIC 200 Positioning resolution 10 nm Diamond tool R 2.0 mm Depth of cut 5 μm - 3 μm - 1 μm Feed rate 2000 mm/min Temperature 23 ℃ Feed pitch 500 μm - 100 μm - 5 μm NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 7 2015 Aug. 27-28 7 Manufacturing result Fabricated test piece (100 mm) Distribution of form error Total manufacturing time: 1 week (a) Aluminium substrate processed by precision cutting Form accuracy: 5 μm P-V and Neutron mirror processed by (b) eletroless nickel plating (Be available) and (c) ultraprecision cutting and polishing Surface rougness: 0.8 nm rms Surface roughness (Goal: <0.5 nm rms) NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg After eletroless nickel plating process, the surface rougness get worse, while after the 1st polishing 8 process, the surface rougness is reduced to 0.72 0n1m5 A Ruga. .2 7-28 8 Focusing experiment at KUR CN-3 L = 2.5 m Pinhole 0.65 m 0.25 m Slit Magnet Chopper Neutrons RPMT Ellipsoidal focusing mirror Goniometer stage Aperture: Ф1 mm (a=1250, b=7) (6-axis) Rail Setup Jiang Guo, Shin Takeda, Shin-ya Morita, Masahiro Hino, Tatsuro Oda, Jun- Slit ichi Kato, Yutaka Yamagata, and Michihiro Mirror Furusaka, "New Fabrication Method for an ellipsoidal neutron focusing mirror with a metal substrate", Optics Express, Vol.22 No.20 DOI: 10.1364/OE.22.024666 NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 9 focused neutron beam 20156 A-uag.x 2i7s- 2s8tage Mirror development for J－PARC beamlines In collaboration with Photon and Quantum Basic Research Coordinated Development Program by MEXT Japan “ Fundamental understanding of friction and lubrication using neutron and muon” Project Leader: Dr. Hideki Seto (KEK) Member : KEK, Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Doshisha University, Kyushu University, Tohoku University NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 10 2015 Aug. 27-28 Large curved test piece: focusing mirror for BL-16 (J-PARC) Focusing optics for BL-16 BL16 SOFIA 1. reflectometry： focusing at sample High Resolution Reflectometry position 2D position sensitive Detector → Higher flux on a small sample Analysis of Material Interface and Structure 2. GISANS： focusing at detector position dynamics. → mesoscopic structure study on inter-plane Figures courtesy by KEK Dr. Yamada slit focusing mirror By using 1-D Ellipsoidal mirror, Incident angle range and intensity will be increased. sample 2D-detector NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 11 2015 Aug. 27-28 Fabrication method for multi-segmented mirror When assembled While machining and coating Mirror segment Dummies for polishing Positioning Pins Mirror Base Alignment of mirror segments are controlled by positioning pins Segment size is limited by coating chamber capacity and Ultraprecision machine tool NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 12 2015 Aug. 27-28 Focusing and reflectivity test at BL-16 J-PARC Side view Beam monitor ( MPSD, 1 mm res ) １D-mirror + slit ( 0.02 mm ) Moderator slit_1 Sample (0.05 or 0.2 mm) stage z slit_2 tilt slit_3 Detector 200 mm 200 mm 11000 mm 2150 mm 2150 mm 2000 mm upstream S.Takeda, D-03, ICANS XXI (2014) downstream NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg FWHM ~ 0.4mm 13 2015 Aug. 27-28 Summary of current mirror development at RIKEN • A new manufacturing strategy of metallic neutron focusing mirror was proposed and basic manufacturing technology was established. • Quality of the focusing mirror was verified by flat test piece and small ellipsoidal focsing mirror. – Diffuse scattering < 10-3.5 – Focusing by ellipsoidal mirror – Profile figure error < 500nm p-v • 1D elliptic focusing mirror (550mm) with 2 segments were fabricated and tested at BL-16 (J-PARC) – Profile figure error was not sufficient due to corrosion – Surface roughness was acceptable (<0.3nm rms) but surface contamination caused reflectivity performance decrease – An improved version of 1D ellipsoidal mirror is now under manufacturing NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 14 2015 Aug. 27-28 Neutron-antineutron oscillation experiment at ESS NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 15 2015 Aug. 27-28 Optics Outline •Additional optics are expected to Conversion enhance FOM. Target •Additional Optics 2 may interfere with ESS monolith. •Additional Optics 1 may be feasible. z=200m Main Optics Additional Optics1 Additional Optics2 z=40m z=10m Figure is expanded to z=5m radial direction by factor of 5 Target/Moderator z=2.6m NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 16 2015 Aug. 27-28 A realistic drawing of optics -Additional Optics 2- 9 0 0 m m m m 0 0 8 NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 17 2015 Aug. 27-28 Manufacturing time and cost estimation Number of curved mirror pieces: 112 (circumuference division: 16, axial segments: 7) Cost estimation: (NOT accurate) mirror pieces: 3,000k JPY x112 Frames : 10,051k JPY Assembly : 10,051k JPY Total : 358,113k JPY (~2.6M euro) Manufacturing time: (1 curved mirror piece /week using current RIKEN facilities using pick-feed Curved mirror pieces shaper cutting.) not exceeding 3.1 years (70% duty ratio) 350mmx200mm Too slow! Need to improve manufacturing speed! NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 18 2015 Aug. 27-28 How to improve manufacturing speed and cost? • Using flat mirror segments – Combination of curved segments and flat segments • Improve curved mirror manufacturing speed NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 19 2015 Aug. 27-28 Using flat mirror segments Horizontal projection ΔW<= z/L * Dtarget Vertical cross section ΔL<= Δα/(dα/dz) Δα~ Dtarget/L Width (Δw) and length (ΔL) limits of flat mirror segments can be estimated from target size NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 20 2015 Aug. 27-28 Estimated number of flat mirros angle of number of number of number of circumfer mirror Δｗ circumfer axial z(mm) x(mm) ence ΔL(mm) segments (mm) ence mirrors division(de per division per meter g) section 2600 453 26 109.5 3.3 3.9 101.7 436 Additional 3000 486 30 101.8 3.5 7.9 125.9 816 Optics 2 4000 560 40 88.0 4.1 5.2 194.0 440 5000 624 50 78.5 4.6 3.7 271.6 312 6000 682 60 71.4 5.0 2.8 358.0 213 Additional 7000 735 70 66.0 5.5 2.2 452.7 132 Optics 1 8000 784 80 61.6 5.8 1.8 555.0 124 9000 829 90 57.9 6.2 1.5 664.8 116 10000 872 100 54.8 6.6 1.3 781.8 55 11000 912 110 52.1 6.9 1.1 905.6 52 12000 950 120 49.7 7.2 1.9 1036.2 100 14000 1020 140 45.8 7.9 1.5 1317.2 92 Main 16000 1085 160 42.6 8.4 1.2 1623.8 43 Optics 18000 1145 180 40.0 9.0 1.0 1955.6 40 20000 1200 200 37.7 9.6 2.2 2312.3 76 25000 1323 250 33.2 10.8 1.5 3312.2 66 30000 1428 300 29.9 12.0 1.1 4468.7 30 35000 1520 350 27.3 13.2 0.9 5787.7 27 40000 Total number of flat mirros 3170 NNbar Collaboration Meeting Gothenburg 21 2015 Aug.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Search for Free Oscillations at the ESS N
    A search for free n → n oscillations at t he ESS π π ? n n π π π D. Milstead Stockholm University Why baryon number violation ? Why baryon number violation ? • Baryon number is not a ”sacred” quantum number – Approximate conservation of BN in SM • ”Accidental” global symmetry at perturbative level – Depends on specific matter content of the SM • BNV in SM by non-perturbative processes –Sphalerons – B-L conserved in SM, not B,L separately. – Generic BNV in BSM theories, eg, SUSY. – BNV a Sakharov condition for baryogenesis Why n→ n ? n→ n • Theory • Baryogenesis via BNV (Sakharov condition) • SM extensions from TeV mass scales scale-upwards • Complementarity with open questions in neutrino physics • Experiment • One of the few means of looking for pure BNV • Stringent limit on stability of matter Neutron oscillations – models • Back-of-envelope dimensional reasoning: cΛ6 6 q operator for ∆B =2, ∆ L = 0⇒ δ m= QCD ⇒ M ∼ 1000 TeV n→ n M 5 • R-parity violating supersymmetry • Unification models: M ∼ 1015 GeV • Extra dimensions models • Post-sp haleron baryogenesis • etc, etc: []arXiv:1410.1100 High precision n→ n search ⇒ Scan over wide range of phase space for generic BNV + ⇒ model constai nts. Extend sensitivity in RPV-SUSY ATLAS multijet ATLAS CMS dijet CMS ESS Arxiv:1602.04821 (hep-ph) Displaced jets RPV-SUSY – TeV-scale sensitivity Neutrino physics ⇔ neutron oscillations Neutrinoless 2β -decay n→ n Eg seesaw mechanism for light ν Eg Unification models ∆L =2, ∆ B = 0, ∆L =0, ∆ B = 2, 2 ∆()B − L = 2 ∆()B − L = Neutrinoless 2β -decay ⇔ nn → linked under BL - viol ation.
    [Show full text]
  • ICANS XXI Dawn of High Power Neutron Sources and Science Applications
    Book of Abstracts ICANS XXI Dawn of high power neutron sources and science applications 29 Sep - 3 Oct 2014, JAPAN Ibaraki Prefectural Culture Center Update : 12 Oct. 2014 Best photography in 7th Oarai Town Photo Contest. WELCOME TO ICANS XXI ICANS (International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources) is a network for scientists who are involved in developing pulsed neutron sources and accelerator based spallation neutron sources. Since 1st ICANS meetings was held in 1977 at Argonne National Laboratory in the day of dawn of spallation neutron technique, ICANS has been continuously held already 20 times somewhere in the world. Now we are extremely happy to announce that the ICANS, the 21st meeting, will be held at Mito hosted by J-PARC this autumn. We have a large number of topics to be discussed, there are twelve topics, such as futuristic idea of neutron source, rapid progress in facilities, integration issues in target-moderator-development, etc. The details can be found in the agenda. The meeting has a two layered structure, one is plenary session and another is workshop. Two of them are complementary and tightly cooperate each other. In the meeting we would like to enhance "workshop style", which is an original and traditional way of ICANS. Actually 2/3 of topics will be discussed in the workshop sessions. It also will be essentially organized/ lead by the workshop chairs. Plenary session shows overall issues in a relevant workshop, whose details should be talked/discussed in the workshop. The venue for the meeting is Mito city, where the 2nd Shogun Family lived for a long period of time during Edo era from 17th to 19th century, when the Tokugawa shogunate ruled the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The HIBEAM Experiment for the European Spallation Source
    The HIBEAM Experiment for the European Spallation Source n ? n D. Milstead Stockholm University Outline 1. The aims of the experiment 2. The physics case 3. The proposed program at the ESS 4. Status HIBEAM High Intensity Baryon Extraction and Measurement Search for • 푛 → 푛ത • 푛 → 푛′ (mirror neutrons) Also measurements of weak nucleon-nucleon interactions. Baryon and lepton number violation • BN,LN ”accidental” SM symmetries at perturbative level – BNV, LNV in SM non-perturbatively (eg instantons) – B-L is conserved, not B, L separately. • BNV, LNV needed for baryogenesis and leptogenesis • BNV,LNV generic features of SM extensions (eg SUSY) nn Dimensional reasoning: c6 6q operator for B 2, L 0 m QCD M 1000 TeV nn M 5 R-parity violating supersymmetry Unification theories: M 1015 GeV Extra dimensions models Post-sphaleron baryogenesis etc, etc: arXiv:1410.1100 High precision n n search Scan over wide range of phase space for generic BNV + model constaints. RPV-SUSY Super-K ILL LHC, flavour Constraints vanish for >> TeV masses nnbar@ESS: extends mass range by up to ~400 TeV cf Super-K : pushes into the PeV scale Complementary B,L-violation observables BL 1, BL 2, 0, BL 0, 2, BL 0 BL 2 BL 2 Symbiosis n n , NN decay. Nucleon decay Stable proton. 0 Few pure BNV searches Neutron oscillations – an experimentalist’s view Hypothesis: baryon number is weakly violated. How do we look for BNV? Single nucleon decay searches, eg, pe 0 ? L-violation, another (likely weakly) violated quantity. Decays without leptons, eg, p , impossible due to angular momentum conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Aspects
    EPJ Web of Conferences 155, 00002 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201715500002 JDN 22 Instrumental aspects Navid Qureshi Institut Laue Langevin, 38000 Grenoble, France Abstract. Every neutron scattering experiment requires the choice of a suited neutron diffractometer (or spectrometer in the case of inelastic scattering) with its optimal configuration in order to accomplish the experimental tasks in the most successful way. Most generally, the compromise between the incident neutron flux and the instrumental resolution has to be considered, which is depending on a number of optical devices which are positioned in the neutron beam path. In this chapter the basic instrumental principles of neutron diffraction will be explained. Examples of different types of experiments and their respective expectable results will be shown. Furthermore, the production and use of polarized neutrons will be stressed. 1. Introduction A successful neutron scattering experiment requires a thorough plan of which instrument to use and how to set up its configuration in order to obtain the best possible results. Optimally, the decision of the set-up is taken beforehand, but in many cases the instrument parameters are modified on-the-fly after analyzing the first results. Due to the different experimental tasks – reaching from magnetic or nuclear structure investigation to the mapping of phase diagrams – and the different sample dimensions (both the crystal size and the lattice parameters), which can be investigated at one and the same instrument, it becomes obvious that the versatility of some instruments has to be adjusted to satisfy the experimental tasks. Obviously, the sample state (powder, single crystal, liquid, etc.) limits the choice of instruments, however, you can find powder diffractometers which differ from each other concerning the used neutron wavelength and particular devices in the beam path in order to maximize the efficiency for a type of experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Viii-I. Summary of Research Activities
    VIII-I. SUMMARY OF RESEARCH ACTIVITIES VIII-I-1. MEETINGS AND SEMINARS Specialists’ Meetings Held in the FY 2013 1. Issues in Radiogenic Circulatory Disease and Cataracts 2. Proceedings of Workshop on Reactor Physics 3. The Results and Future Prospects of Activation Analysis Using KUR" 4. Workshop on Materials Irradiation Effects and Applications 5. Proceedings of the Specialist Research Meeting on Science and Engineering of Unstable Nuclei and Their Uses on Condensed Matter Physics III 6. Proceedings of the Specialist Research Meeting on “Abnormal Protein Aggregation and the Folding Diseases, and their Protection and Repair System” (VI) 7. Proceedings of the Symposium on Present and Future Statuses of Criticality Safety Research 8. Novel Development of BNCT - From Special to General - 9. Proceedings of the Specialists' Meeting on the Chemistry and Technology of Actinide Elements Proceedings of the Specialist Research Meeting on Science and Engineering of Unstable Nuclei and Their 10. Technological Development, Operation, and Data Analysis of Radiation Mapping Systems in Affected Area of Nuclear Accident 11. Proceedings of the Specialist Meeting on Positron Annihilation Study for Science and Engineering 2013 12. Proceedings of the Specialists' Meeting on Radioactive Wastes Management 13. Neutron Imaging Workshops Organized in the FY 2013 1. Promotion of Leading Research toward Effective Utilization of Multidisciplinary Nuclear Science and Technology 2. Workshop of Next Neutron Source for Beam Utilization after KUR II Special Meeting Held in the FY2013 Meeting on the Future Project of the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute VIII-I-2. COLLABORATION RESEARCH AND VISITING SCIENTISTS Visiting Scientists The number of project researches .................................................. 11 (The number of allotted research subject) ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting the Missing Baryon Number Violation at the ESS
    Hunting the missing baryon number violation at the ESS n ? n D. Milstead Stockholm University Outline • Why look for neutron oscillations ? • How to look for neutron oscillations • Nnbar and HIBEAM at the ESS Baryon and lepton number violation • BN,LN ”accidental” SM symmetries at perturbative level – BNV, LNV in SM non-perturbatively (eg instantons) – B-L is conserved, not B, L separately. • BNV, LNV needed for baryogenesis and leptogenesis • BNV,LNV generic features of SM extensions (eg SUSY) • Need to explore the possible selection rules: BLBL 0 , 0, 0 BLBL 0 , 0, 0 LBBL 0 , 0, 0 ..... Neutron oscillation Mirror neutrons Neutron-antineutron oscillations R-parity violating supersymmetry, minimal flavour violation SUSY Unification models: M 1015 GeV Left-right symmetric models (nn and 0 2 ) Extra dimensions models Post-sphaleron baryogenesis etc, etc: arXiv:1410.1100 High precision n n search Scan over wide range of phase space for generic BNV + model constaints. Operator analysis Six quark operators i : n n, NN NN KK 1 Eg : n n neff n5 i n i n M X i Short distance (RPV SUSY): i 6 Long distance Hadronic ME: nni QCD 1 M 5 Oscillation time = X 6 nneff QCD Beyond the TeV scale Super-K ILL LHC, flavour Constraints vanish for >> TeV masses nnbar@ESS: extends mass range by up to ~400 TeV cf Super-K : pushes into the PeV scale : Reach beyond the LHC An experimentalist’s view (1) Hypothesis: baryon number is weakly violated. How do we look for it ? Need processes in which only BNV takes place. Single nucleon decay searches, eg, pe 0 ? BL 11 , ! Decays without leptons, eg, p , impossible due to angular momentum conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Program—Advances in Neutron Facilities, Instrumentation & Software
    As of July 10, 2020 American Conference on Neutron Scattering Advances in Neutron Facilities, Instrumentation and Software * Invited Paper SESSION A02.01: Neutron Source become the leading institution in neutron science in Latin America. Main challenges of the LAHN project and Facilities I are (i) to implement a suite of state-of-the-art neutron scattering instruments, (ii) to build a solid neutron scattering user community, (iii) to form the human A02.01.01* resources necessary for defining, implementing, Neutron Scattering Facilities at the McMaster operating and using the instruments. Nuclear Reactor In this work we present the strategies and activities Patrick Clancy; McMaster University, Canada developed to achieve these goals, and the current state of the project. This includes a description of the The McMaster Nuclear Reactor (MNR) is a 5 MW suite of eight instruments defined for the first stage of open-pool reactor located on the campus of the laboratory, together with their scientific cases and McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. the different strategies adopted for their provision. Following the closure of the NRU Reactor at Chalk We also describe a comprehensive program River in March 2018, MNR is the only facility in developed to foster the user community, train LAHN Canada with neutron scattering capabilities. At human resources and increase LAHN visibility in present, MNR is home to two neutron scattering order to reach a wider group of stakeholders. instruments: the McMaster Alignment Diffractometer (MAD), a general purpose triple-axis spectrometer, A02.01.03 and the McMaster Small Angle Neutron Scattering Neutron Scattering at Missouri—Current Status beamline (MacSANS).
    [Show full text]
  • From X-Ray Telescopes to Neutron Scattering: Using Axisymmetric Mirrors to Focus a Neutron Beam
    From x-ray telescopes to neutron scattering: Using axisymmetric mirrors to focus a neutron beam The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Khaykovich, B. et al. “From x-ray telescopes to neutron scattering: Using axisymmetric mirrors to focus a neutron beam.” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 631.1 (2011): 98-104. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.11.110 Publisher Elsevier Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61704 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. Published: B. Khaykovich, et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A (2010), doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.11.110 From x-ray telescopes to neutron scattering: using axisymmetric mirrors to focus a neutron beam B. Khaykovich1*, M. V. Gubarev2, Y. Bagdasarova3, B. D. Ramsey2, and D. E. Moncton1,3 1Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 138 Albany St., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA, VP62, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA 3Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Abstract We demonstrate neutron beam focusing by axisymmetric mirror systems based on a pair of mirrors consisting of a confocal ellipsoid and hyperboloid. Such a system, known as a Wolter mirror configuration, is commonly used in x-ray telescopes.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Neutron Diffraction
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Combined Neutron Imaging and Diffraction: Instrumentation and Experimentation Thesis How to cite: Burca, Genoveva (2013). Combined Neutron Imaging and Diffraction: Instrumentation and Experimentation. PhD thesis The Open University. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2013 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21954/ou.ro.0000f116 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk crrei> Combined Neutron Imaging and Diffraction: Instrumentation and Experimentation Thesis submitted to The Open University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Mathematics, Computing and Technology (MCT) By Genoveva Burca Materials Engineering Group The Open University September 2012 ProQuest Number: 13835948 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 13835948 Published by ProQuest LLC(2019). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Shielding Copper Substrate Neutron Supermirror Guides
    Self-Shielding Copper Substrate Neutron Supermirror Guides P. M. Bentley1,5, R. Hall-Wilton1,3,4, C. P. Cooper-Jensen1, N. Cherkashyna1, K. Kanaki1, C. Schanzer2, M. Schneider2, P. B¨oni2 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 1 European Spallation Source ERIC, Box 176, 221 00 Lund, Sweden 2 Swiss Neutronics AG Neutron Optical Components & Instruments, Br¨uhlstrasse 28, CH-5313 Klingnau, Switzerland 3 Universit`adegli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy 4 University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom 5 Anderson Butovich Ltd. United Kingdom Abstract. The invention of self-shielding copper substrate neutron guides is described, along with the rationale behind the development, and the realisation of commercial supply. The relative advantages with respect to existing technologies are quantified. These include ease of manufacture, long lifetime, increased thermal conductivity, and enhanced fast neutron attenuation in the keV-MeV energy range. Whilst the activation of copper is initially higher than for other material options, for the full energy spectrum, many of the isotopes are short-lived, so that for realistic maintenance access times the radiation dose to workers is expected to be lower than steel and in the lowest zoning category for radiation safety outside the spallation target monolith. There is no impact on neutron reflectivity performance relative to established alternatives, and the manufacturing cost is similar to other polished metal arXiv:2104.02453v2 [physics.ins-det] 16 Apr 2021 substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Polarizing Multilayer Neutron Mirrors
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/ Masterarbeit ist in der Hauptbibliothek der Tech- nischen Universität Wien aufgestellt und zugänglich. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at The approved original version of this diploma or master thesis is available at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology. http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/eng DIPLOMARBEIT Polarizing Multilayer Neutron Mirrors zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Diplom-Ingenieur im Rahmen des Studiums Technische Physik eingereicht von Martin Wess Matrikelnummer 01325756 ausgef¨uhrtam Atominstitut der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Technischen Universit¨atWien in Zusammenarbeit mit der Universit¨atLink¨oping Betreuung Betreuer: Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Gerald Badurek Mitwirkung: Ass.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Erwin Jericha Mitwirkung: Assoc.Prof. Dr.techn. Fredrik Eriksson (Link¨oping) Wien, 01.04.2019 (Unterschrift Verfasser) (Unterschrift Betreuer) Zusammenfassung Diese Diplomarbeit beschreibt Prinzip, Design, Herstellung und Charakterisierung von polarisierenden Vielschicht-Neutronenspiegeln. Das Hauptaugenmerk wurde auf die Optimierung der Umgebungsparameter w¨ahrendder Herstellung gelegt, um m¨oglichst ideale Grenzfl¨achen zu generieren. Die Grenzfl¨achen sollen minimale Rauheit und Mischung zwischen den Schichten aufweisen, um Neutronenspiegel mit hoher Qualit¨atzu erhalten. Um polarisierende Vielschicht-Neutronenspiegel herzustellen, muss eines der beiden gew¨ahlten Materialien ferromagnetisch sein. Außerdem ist es wichtig, dass das nukleare Fermi-Pseudopotential f¨urden niedrigeren Spinzustand des ferromag- netischen Partners m¨oglichst gleich groß ist wie das des unmagnetischen Materi- als. Cobalt (Co) und Titan (Ti) erf¨ullendiese Voraussetzungen und wurden daher als Materialien gew¨ahlt.Der Einfluss der Beimischung von isotopangereichertem, 11 schwach Neutron-absorbierendem Borcarbid ( B4C) auf die Qualit¨atder Grenz- fl¨achen wurde gr¨undlich untersucht.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron-Antineutron Oscillation Experiments
    Neutron-AntineutronNeutron-Antineutron OscillationOscillation Experiments:Experiments: WhatWhat HaveHave WeWe LearnedLearned atat thethe Workshop?Workshop? W. M. Snow Indiana University/CEEM Project X Workshop Why ΔB=2? (theory/phenomenology) Neutron-antineutron oscillations in nuclei:theory and experiment Free neutron oscillations: experimental requirements @Project X Thanks to co-conveners: Chris Quigg (FNAL), Albert Young (NC State) Neutron-AntineutronNeutron-Antineutron Oscillations:Oscillations: SpeakerSpeaker ListList (from(from Germany,Germany, Georgia,Georgia, India,India, Japan,Japan, US)US) Speaker Subject R. Mohapathra, Maryland theory/phenomonology M. Snow, Indiana various G. Greene, ORNL/Tennessee R&D needs I. Gogoladze, Bartol/Delaware theory/phenomonology M. Chen, Irvine leptogenesis K. Babu, Oklahoma State theory/phenomonology M. Stavenga, FNAL theory M. Buchoff, LLNL theory/lattice E. Kearns, Boston experiment/nnbar in nuclei A. Vainshtein, Minnesota theory/nnbar in nuclei Y. Kamyshkov, Tennessee experiment options R. Tayloe, Indiana detectors K. Ganezer, CSUDH nnbar in nuclei D. Dubbers, Heidelberg ILL experiment T. Gabriel, ORNL/Tennessee SNS 1MW target G. Muhrer, LANL 1MW target/moderator design H. Shimizu, Nagoya neutron supermirror optics C-Y Liu, Indiana (also for D. Baxter, Indiana) moderator experiments/simulations S. Banerjee, Tata Institute detectors Neutron-Antineutron Oscillations: Formalism " n% ! = n-nbar state vector α≠0 allows oscillations #$ n&' " En ( % H = $ ' Hamiltonian of n-nbar system # ( E n & p2 p2 En = mn + + Un ; En = mn + + Un 2mn 2mn Note : • ( real (assuming T) • mn = mn (assuming CPT) U U in matter and in external B [ n n from CPT] • n ) n µ( ) = *µ( ) Neutron-Antineutron transition probability # E + V ! & ! 2 + ! 2 + V 2 . For H = P (t) = * sin2 - t 0 % E V ( n)n 2 2 $ ! " ' ! + V ,- ! /0 where V is the potential difference for neutron and anti-neutron.
    [Show full text]