DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Boulder City, Nevada Eldorado Valley Waterline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Boulder City, Nevada Eldorado Valley Waterline CITY OF BOULDER CITY, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION ELDORADO VALLEY WATERLINE EXTENSION ‐ PHASE II BOULDER CITY PROJECT NO. 18‐1030‐WD PROPOSALS DUE: THURSDAY, JUNE 21, 2018 – 2:00 PM FORMAL BID No. FB‐0723‐18 FUNDED BY: THE CITY OF BOULDER CITY Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 1 of 116 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page NOTICE INVITING BIDS 3 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 6 OFFICIAL PROPOSAL 10 BID SCHEDULE I 12 BID BOND 14 INFORMATION REQUIRED OF BIDDER 15 CONTRACTOR’S GENERAL INFORMATION 19 SUBCONTRACTOR’S LIST 21 EQUIPMENT /MATERIAL SOURCE INFORMATION 22 AGREEMENT 23 CERTIFICATE OF OWNER’S ATTORNEY 25 AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION 26 CORPORATE CERTIFICATE 30 PARTNERSHIP CERTIFICATE 31 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND 32 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND 33 GUARANTEE BOND 34 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 35 GENERAL CONDITIONS 36 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 62 PROJECT LOCATION MAP 79 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGN 80 POTHOLING DATA SHEET 81 2018 PREVAILING WAGE RATES CLARK COUNTY 83 Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 2 of 116 NOTICE INVITING BIDS RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS: Sealed proposals will be received at the office of the Finance Director, City of Boulder City, Nevada, Owner of the work located at City Hall, 401 California Avenue, Boulder City, Nevada 89005, until 2:00 PM, Thursday, June 21, 2018, for the ELDORADO VALLEY WATERLINE EXTENSION – PHASE II, BOULDER CITY PROJECT NO. 18‐1030‐WD. SITE OF WORK: The site of work is located within the city limits of Boulder City, Nevada; more specifically, crossing a portion of Boulder City Parkway (US‐93) west of Veterans Memorial Drive. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: This work shall include furnishing all labor, material and equipment to complete the Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II project as described in the specifications and shown in the plans. Work includes excavation of approximately 1,230 linear feet of trenching, installation, and backfilling of a 16” C900‐16 PVC waterline. This work shall also include the installation of 6” blow‐off, 4” AVAR, & tee assemblies, valves, bends, restraint fittings, and other miscellaneous related items. This work shall include the installation of approximately 300 linear feet of 30” steel pipe casing by a bore and jack method under existing Boulder City Parkway and an existing railroad track. This project also includes the installation of approximately 40 square yards of asphalt paving in a three inch section. COMPLETION OF WORK: All work including deficiency list items must be completed within ninety (90) calendar days after the date of the Notice to Proceed by the Owner. The Contractor shall provide a one year warranty for the scope of work performed in this contract. The one year warranty shall be from the date of the Notice of Completion. DEFICIENCY LIST: The Contractor is required to request a deficiency list inspection to be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to the final contract day. The Contractor shall provide a minimum of a ten (10) calendar day notice for the deficiency list inspection. During the deficiency list inspection the Contractor shall generate the deficiency list and distribute to all parties within seven calendar days. OPENING OF PROPOSALS: The proposals will be publicly opened and read at 2:00 PM Thursday, June 21, 2018, at City Hall. OBTAINING CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: The plans, specifications, and all contract documents may be obtained on the City’s website at http://www.bcnv.org/bids.aspx. Bidders who download the contract documents are responsible to check the webpage for updates and addenda. PROPOSAL GUARANTEE: Each proposal shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier’s check or bid bond in an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the total bid price, payable to the City of Boulder City as a guarantee that the bidder, if his proposal is accepted, will promptly execute the contract. Workman’s Compensation Insurance, Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the total bid price, a Labor and Material Bond in the amount Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 3 of 116 of one hundred percent (100%) of the total bid price, and a Guarantee Bond will be executed as part of the contract agreement. If applicable, bidders shall provide documentation to meet requirements of NRS 338.147 as part of their bid proposal. QUALIFICATION OF BIDDER: At the time of bidding, a bidder must hold a valid license of a class corresponding to the work performed, in accordance with the provisions of the Nevada State Contractor’s License Law. CLARK COUNTY PREVAILING WAGE RATES: Wage rates on the project shall meet Clark County Prevailing Wage Rates for Public Works, State of Nevada, dated 10/1/17 through 9/30/18. The following Clark County Prevailing Wage Rate Number shall be issued to the Contractor awarded this Contract ‐ CL‐2018‐273. This project is located approximately 21+ miles from the Las Vegas City Hall. The Contractor is responsible for insuring that the correct prevailing wage rates, including any applicable zone pay, are used on this project. ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST: $400,000 – $800,000 PRE‐BID CONFERENCE: A pre‐bid conference concerning this project will be held on Tuesday, June 5, 2018, at 10:00 AM in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 401 California Avenue, Boulder City, Nevada 89005. AREA LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 4 of 116 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION: All questions relative to this project prior to the opening of bids shall be directed to the Project Representative for the project in writing or via e‐mail. City of Boulder City Project Representative 401 California Avenue Boulder City, NV 89005 ATTN: Shane Cunningham, Construction Manager [email protected] OWNER’S RIGHTS RESERVED: The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids, to waive any informality in a bid, and to make awards in the interest of the Owner. CITY OF BOULDER CITY BY: Scott P. Hansen, P.E., Director of Public Works DATE: Published: Las Vegas Review Journal May 24, 2018 City of Boulder City website www.bcnv.org Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 5 of 116 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FORM OF PROPOSAL: The proposal shall be made on the bidding schedule(s) bound herein and the proposal shall be submitted and include all pages identified with the RECYCLE logo located in the upper right‐hand corner of the page. The proposal shall be enclosed in a sealed envelope bearing the name of the bidder and the name of the project. In the event there is more than one bidding schedule, the bidder may bid on any individual schedule or on any combination of schedules. DELIVERY OF PROPOSAL: The proposal shall be delivered by the time and to the place stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. It is the bidder’s sole responsibility to see that his proposal is received in proper time. Any proposal received after the scheduled closing time for receipt of proposals will be returned to the bidder unopened. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL: The proposal may be withdrawn by the bidder by means of a written request, signed by the bidder or his properly authorized representative. Such written requests must be delivered to the place stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids for receipt of proposals prior to the scheduled closing time for receipt of proposals. OPENING OF PROPOSALS: The proposals will be publicly opened and read at the time and place stipulated in the Notice Inviting Bids. MODIFICATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS: Unauthorized conditions, limitations, or provisions attached to a proposal will render it informal and may cause its rejection. The completed proposal forms shall be without interlineations, alterations, or erasures. Alternative proposals will not be considered unless called for. Oral, telegraphic, telephonic, or emailed proposals or modifications will not be considered. DISCREPANCIES IN PROPOSALS: In the event there is more than one bid item in a bidding schedule, the bidder shall furnish a price for all bid items in the schedule, and failure to do so will render the proposal informal and may cause its rejection. In the event there are unit price bid items in a bidding schedule and the “amount” indicated for a unit price bid item does not equal the product of the unit price and quantity, the unit price shall govern and the amount will be corrected accordingly. In the event there is more than one bid item in a bidding schedule and the total indicated for the schedule does not agree with the sum of the prices bid on the individual items, the prices bid on the individual items shall govern and the total for the schedule will be corrected accordingly. DESIGNATED CONTACTS: Communication between a bidder and a member of the City Council or between a Bidder and a non‐designated CITY contact, regarding this bid is prohibited from the time the bid is advertised until the time of award of the Contract. Eldorado Valley Waterline Extension – Phase II B.C. Project No. 18‐1030‐WD 6 of 116 Questions pertaining to this invitation shall be addressed in writing or via email only to the Project Representative listed under the Project Administration section of the Notice Inviting Bids. Questions must be received a minimum of eight (8) calendar days prior to the bid opening. Any questions received within seven (7) calendar days prior to the bid opening will not be answered. PROPOSAL GUARANTEE: Each proposal shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier’s check or bid bond in the amount stated in the Notice Inviting Bids.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus Agassizii) Genetic Connectivity
    University of Nevada, Reno Connecting the Plots: Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) Genetic Connectivity A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geography By Kirsten Erika Dutcher Dr. Jill S. Heaton, Dissertation Advisor May 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by KIRSTEN ERIKA DUTCHER entitled Connecting the Plots: Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) Genetic Connectivity be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Jill S. Heaton, Ph.D. Advisor Kenneth E. Nussear, Ph.D. Committee Member Scott D. Bassett, Ph.D. Committee Member Amy G. Vandergast, Ph.D. Committee Member Marjorie D. Matocq, Ph.D. Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School May, 2020 i ABSTRACT Habitat disturbance impedes connectivity for native populations by altering natural movement patterns, significantly increasing the risk of population decline. The Mojave Desert historically exhibited high ecological connectivity, but human presence has increased recently, as has habitat disturbance. Human land use primarily occurs in Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) habitat posing risks to the federally threatened species, which has declined as a result. As threats intensify, so does the need to protect tortoise habitat and connectivity. Functional corridors require appropriate habitat amounts and population densities, as individuals may need time to achieve connectivity and find mates. Developments in tortoise habitat have not been well studied, and understanding the relationship between barriers, corridors, population density, and gene flow is an important step towards species recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Solar Lease Revenues
    LIVE WORK PLAY RETIRE TURNING LAND INTO REVENUES: UNDERSTANDING SOLAR LEASE REVENUES Reprint Date: August 25, 2020 Mayor Kiernan McManus Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Mayor pro tem Claudia Bridges Tracy Folda Judith A. Hoskins James Howard Adams City Manager Finance Director Alfonso Noyola, ICMA-CM Diane Pelletier, CPA Boulder City Revenue Overview Table of Contents Unlike most other municipalities and counties in Nevada, the revenue stream for Boulder City does not include the lucrative Some History . gaming tax. Prior to the recession of 2007 - 2009, the City’s • 4 • revenue stream did not have a sizable amount of monies from land leases. With the recent focus by California and more Charter/Ordinance Requirements recently at the national level on renewable energy development, • 4 • the City was in a key position to take advantage of its unique Land Lease Process position for solar development by leasing city-owned land for • 6 • energy production. Because of those prudent actions, today the Energy Lease Revenue History solar lease revenues equate to roughly 28% to 34% of the City’s • 7 • overall revenue stream to support vital governmental functions. Energy Lease Revenue Projections • • But is Land Lease Revenue Stable? 9 A common question posed to our City Council surrounds the Energy Lease Revenue Potential stability of land lease revenues. Traditional commercial or • 9 • residential land leases have many risks, as the tenants are Overall Energy Lease Revenue subject to market conditions or changes in employment. And History and Projections with recessions, these types of leases are common casualties • 10 • of a downturn in the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\A Projects\AAA IBLA Decs\066IBLA\L265-268.Wpd
    THOMAS CONNELLY ET AL. IBLA 81-344 Decided August 17, 1982 Appeal from decision of the Nevada State Office, Bureau of Land Management, rejecting in part oil and gas lease offer N-30806. Affirmed. 1. Oil and Gas Leases: Discretion to Lease The Secretary of the Interior may, in his discretion, reject any offer to lease public lands for oil and gas upon a determination, supported by facts of record, that the leasing would not be in the public interest because it is incompatible with uses of the lands which are worthy of preservation. APPEARANCES: C. M. Peterson, Esq., Denver, Colorado, for appellants. OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE BURSKI Thomas H. Connelly and Robert W. David appeal from a January 15, 1981, decision of the Nevada State Office, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), rejecting in part their oil and gas lease offer N-30806. BLM rejected the offer insofar as it concerned land in sec. 6: lots 8 and 9, S 1/2 NE 1/4, SE 1/4; sec. 7: E 1/2; sec. 18: E 1/2; and accepted the offer only as to sec. 28, all in T. 27 S., R. 63 E., Mount Diablo meridian, Clark County, Nevada. 1/ BLM listed the following reason for partial rejection: According to Stateline EAR of the Las Vegas District Office, these lands have been designated as part of the 'Highland Range Crucial Bighorn Habitat Area' (CFR 2071-1). Because these lands have been identified as crucial to the survival of a bighorn herd, they have been closed to oil, gas and geothermal exploration and leasing.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Affected Environment
    3. Affected Environment 3.1 Introduction This chapter provides a description of the existing social, economic, and environmental settings for the area affected by the three build alternatives and the No Build Alternative. The affected environment is described for each resource of concern in the Boulder City/ U.S. 93 Corridor Study project area. The discussion contains study methodologies, background information, descriptive data, issues, and values that have a bearing on possible impacts and mitigation measures (described in detail in Chapter 4) and on the selection of the preferred alternative. This EIS was prepared consistent with National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR 1500. et seq) and the FHWA Guidance for Preparing and Processing Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents (FHWA Technical Advisory T 6640.8A, October 30, 1987). This guidance lists potentially adverse impacts most commonly encountered by highway projects and directs that these factors should be discussed for each reasonable alternative where a potential for impact exists. Environmental and socioeconomic factors potentially impacted by the proposed project are analyzed in detail in this chapter. Factors that were found to have no potential for project-related impacts and are not discussed in this chapter are as follows: x Joint Development x Farmland x Wild and Scenic Rivers x Coastal Barriers x Coastal Zone Impacts The following additional technical studies were prepared for the Boulder City/U.S. 93 Corridor Study DEIS, and they are available through NDOT (contact Daryl James at 775/888-7013 for additional information): x Air Quality x Noise x Biological Resources x Water Quality x Wetlands x Floodplains x Archaeological Resources x Historic Resources x Land Use x Visual Resources x Economics x Social Impacts x Hazardous Waste T012004001SCO/ DRD1333.DOC/ 050740004 3-1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • South Clark County Land Use Plan
    South Clark County Land Use Plan Henderson Mt. Potosi Boulder Spring Mtns City NRA Sloan Red Rock NCA Sloan Canyon Eldorado National Valley Conservation Area Sandy Goodsprings Valley 161 Jean 165 Colorado River Nelson Ivanpah McCullough Range Valley Lake Mead Primm 95 National Recreation Area California Arizona Cottonwood Cove 164 Searchlight Lake Mojave Goodsprings & Sandy Valley Cal-Nev-Ari Citizens Advisory Councils Palm & Searchlight Gardens 163 Town Advisory Board Laughlin Adopted - December 5, 2012 Effective - January 9, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Clark County Board of Commissioners: Mark Silverstein, Department of Aviation Susan Brager, Chair Margie Yatson, Clark County Fire Steve Sisolak, Vice-Chair Department Larry Brown Linda Perri, Clark County School District Tom Collins Lebene Aidam-Ohene, High Impact Projects Chris Giunchigliani Manager Mary Beth Scow Denis Cedarburg, Public Works Lawrence Weekly Kevin Eubanks, Regional Flood Control Julie Chadburn, Water Reclamation District Planning Commission: Kathleen Blakely, Park Planning Vivian Kilarski, Chair Justin Williams, Park Planning Edward Frasier, III, Vice-Chair J. Christopher Dapper Office of County Manager: Greg Esposito Don Burnette, Manager Randy Miller Randall J. Tarr, Assistant Manager Dan Shaw Ed Finger, Assistant Manager Donna Tagliaferri Jeff Wells, Assistant Manager Goodsprings Citizens Advisory Council: Department of Comprehensive Planning: Elizabeth Warren, Chair Nancy Lipski, Director Monica Beisecker, Vice-Chair Jon Wardlaw, Planning Manager Theodore Louis Compton
    [Show full text]
  • DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL 4654 East Avenue S #257B Palmdale, California 93552 [email protected]
    DESERT TORTOISE COUNCIL 4654 East Avenue S #257B Palmdale, California 93552 www.deserttortoise.org [email protected] 12 March 2014 Mark Slaughter, Assistant Field Manager Bureau of Land Management, Southern Nevada District Office 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130, [email protected] RE: Proposed release of captive desert tortoises into the Piute-Eldorado Critical Habitat Unit, Clark County, Nevada Dear Mr. Slaughter: The Desert Tortoise Council (Council) is a private, non-profit organization comprised of hundreds of professionals and laypersons who share a common concern for wild desert tortoises and a commitment to advancing the public’s understanding of this species. Established in 1976 to promote conservation of tortoises in the deserts of the southwestern United States and Mexico, the Council regularly provides information to individuals, organizations and regulatory agencies on matters potentially affecting the desert tortoise within its historical range. The Council formally asked the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to consider us as an Interested Party in the translocation and population augmentation of tortoises into southern Nevada on 14 September 2012 (letter available upon request). What is the status of our request? Are we currently considered an Interested Party for this and other tortoise-related issues on public lands managed by the BLM in Nevada? In September 2012 there was no indication that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) intended to release up to 600 captive tortoises onto BLM lands in the Piute-Eldorado Critical Habitat Unit. The Council only incidentally heard about this intended release at the recent Council Symposium held in Ontario, California on 21-23 February 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2010-0091-EA November 2014 Southern Nevada Intertie Project APPLICANT Great Basin Transmission, LLC GENERAL LOCATION Clark County, Nevada BLM CASE FILE SERIAL NUMBER N-086359 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 Phone: (702) 515-5172 Fax: (702) 515-5010 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Identifying Information ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.1. Title, EA Number, and Type of Project .............................................. 1-2 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action ............................................................... 1-2 1.1.3. Name and Location of Preparing Office ............................................. 1-2 1.1.4. Identify the Case File Number ............................................................ 1-2 1.1.5. Applicant Name ................................................................................... 1-2 1.2. Purpose and Need for Action ............................................................................. 1-2 1.2.1. Background ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.2. BLM Purpose and Need .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boulder City, Nevada City Manager Page 1
    BOULDER CITY, NEVADA CITY MANAGER PAGE 1 BOULDER CITY, NEVADA CITY MANAGER BOULDER CITY, NV (Population: 16,207) Located 30 minutes from Las Vegas airport, Boulder City is a delightful and unique desert town located in the southern tip of Nevada. Boulder City enjoys a distinctive heritage, with its roots beginning with the implementation of one of the most significant public works projects in history -- the Boulder Canyon Project, a monumental federal undertaking resulting in the construction of Hoover Dam. Boulder City is a beautiful high oasis in the desert (elev. 2,400 ft.) with green lawns and many clean, tree-shaded streets overlooking man-made Lake Mead and the Lake Mead Recreation Area. The Safewise report for 2020 has “Clean, Green Boulder City” as the safest city in Nevada. The City of Boulder City is known as the city that housed over 4,000 workers during the construction of Hoover Dam (1931 to 1935). It remains home to some of the families of original Dam workers, fondly called the “31-ers”. The city was supervised and regulated by the Federal Bureau of Reclamation and all land in an around the city was owned by the federal government. In 1958, the federal government passed the Boulder City Act and established an independent municipal government, Boulder City. Under this Act, the federal government turned over the existing government reservation site (approximately 33 sq. mi. of land) and the utility system to the residents of Boulder City. Following many years of extremely rapid growth, in 1979 the city adopted a controlled growth ordinance for the purpose of controlling the rate and distribution of development throughout the community to ensure the adequacy of the City’s facilities and services within acceptable allocation of City revenues.
    [Show full text]
  • NV Energy North
    Annual Progress Report for Planning Coordination NV Energy 2021 Annual Progress Report February 16, 2021 To: The WECC, Studies Subcommittee In accordance with WECC Progress Report Policies and Procedures, NV Energy is submitting 2021 Annual Progress Report, as presented below. NV Energy North Bordertown to California Sub 120 kV Project This project is comprised of a new 345/120 kV 280 MVA transformer at NVE’s Bordertown Substation and a 120 kV, 11-mile line from Bordertown to California substation. This project is expected to be in service by end of 2025. Multiple studies on the project have been performed by NVE indicating that no significant regional impact from these internal transmission facilities can be expected. West Tracy 345/120 kV Transformer This project is driven by expected load growth in the Reno/Tracy area. The project includes the construction of a new 120 kV switchyard and a new 345/120 kV 280 MVA transformer at the existing West Tracy substation. This project is planned to be in service in 2022. Multiple studies on the project have been performed by NVE indicating that no significant regional impact from this internal transmission facility can be expected. Dodge Flat Solar Energy Center NextEra Dodge Flat Solar PV project: Interconnection of 200 MW Solar PV generation and 50MW battery storage at Olinghouse 345 kV switching station folded into the 345kV Valmy – Tracy kV line #1. The proposed ISD is 12/2021. This was PUCN approved project in 2018. No regional effects or affected systems that are associated with this project have been identified by NVE.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2012-0146-EA This Page Intentionally Left Blank DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2012-0146-EA Iii Table of Contents
    B L M U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2012-0146-EA September 2012 Techren Boulder City Solar Project 69kV Gen-Tie Transmission Line Project NVN-90395 PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office Las Vegas Field Office 4701 N Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 702–515–5172 Office 702–515–5010 Fax Environmental Assessment DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2012-0146-EA This page intentionally left blank DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2012-0146-EA iii Table of Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1. Identifying Information: ................................................................................................... 5 1.1.1. Title, EA number, and type of project: .................................................................. 5 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action: ................................................................................ 5 1.1.3. Name and Location of Preparing Office: ............................................................... 5 1.1.4. Identify the subject function code, lease, serial, or case file number: ................... 5 1.1.5. Applicant Name: ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thickness and Storage Capacity of Basin Fill of the Northern Part of the Eldorado Valley, Nevada, and the Extent of the Boulder City Pluton
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THICKNESS AND STORAGE CAPACITY OF BASIN FILL OF THE NORTHERN PART OF THE ELDORADO VALLEY, NEVADA, AND THE EXTENT OF THE BOULDER CITY PLUTON By V.E. Langenheim1 and K.M. Schmidt3 1996 Open-File Report 96-512 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. US. Geological Survey, MS 989, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction............................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................... 1 Geologic Setting......................................................................................................! Gravity Data............................................................................................................ 3 Drill Hole Data and Physical Properties.................................................................. 4 Gravity Anomalies.................................................................................................. 5 Depth
    [Show full text]