DOCSLIB.ORG

South Clark County Land Use Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Clark County Land Use Plan South Clark County Land Use Plan Henderson Mt. Potosi Boulder Spring Mtns City NRA Sloan Red Rock NCA Sloan Canyon Eldorado National Valley Conservation Area Sandy Goodsprings Valley 161 Jean 165 Colorado River Nelson Ivanpah McCullough Range Valley Lake Mead Primm 95 National Recreation Area California Arizona Cottonwood Cove 164 Searchlight Lake Mojave Goodsprings & Sandy Valley Cal-Nev-Ari Citizens Advisory Councils Palm & Searchlight Gardens 163 Town Advisory Board Laughlin Adopted - December 5, 2012 Effective - January 9, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Clark County Board of Commissioners: Mark Silverstein, Department of Aviation Susan Brager, Chair Margie Yatson, Clark County Fire Steve Sisolak, Vice-Chair Department Larry Brown Linda Perri, Clark County School District Tom Collins Lebene Aidam-Ohene, High Impact Projects Chris Giunchigliani Manager Mary Beth Scow Denis Cedarburg, Public Works Lawrence Weekly Kevin Eubanks, Regional Flood Control Julie Chadburn, Water Reclamation District Planning Commission: Kathleen Blakely, Park Planning Vivian Kilarski, Chair Justin Williams, Park Planning Edward Frasier, III, Vice-Chair J. Christopher Dapper Office of County Manager: Greg Esposito Don Burnette, Manager Randy Miller Randall J. Tarr, Assistant Manager Dan Shaw Ed Finger, Assistant Manager Donna Tagliaferri Jeff Wells, Assistant Manager Goodsprings Citizens Advisory Council: Department of Comprehensive Planning: Elizabeth Warren, Chair Nancy Lipski, Director Monica Beisecker, Vice-Chair Jon Wardlaw, Planning Manager Theodore Louis Compton Colleen Hicks Planning Team: Ruth Rawlinson Kevin Smedley, Principal Planner Jeri Pinkerton, Secretary Paul Doerr, Senior Planner Shane Ammerman, Assistant Planning Sandy Valley Citizens Advisory Council: Manager Wade Schneiderman, Chair Ron Gregory, Principal Planner Dave Lowe, Vice-Chair Daniel Sinagra, Senior Planner William Carter Jackie Brady, Searchlight Liaison Patrick Lee Meggan Holzer, Rural Towns Liaison George Odell Chris Munhall, Rural Towns Liaison Electra Smith, Secretary Christopher LaMay, GIS Analyst II Searchlight Town Advisory Board: Jill Canepa, Chair Sandra J. Walters, Vice-Chair Bill Bodkin Verlie Doing Eleanor M. Shook Leslie Uncel, Secretary Technical Advisory Group: Ron Gregory, Trails Planning Manager Marci Henson, MSHCP Ebrahim Juma, Water Planning Lee Bice, Environmental Planning South County Land Use Plan Dec 2012 i Table of Contents CHAPTER 1……………............................................................................................................ 1 STATE LAW…....................................................................................................................... 1 BACK GROUND...................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN......................................................................................................... 1 PLANNING PROCESS............................................................................................................. 2 CHAPTER 2……………............................................................................................................ 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS…....................................................................................................... 3 Demographics…......................................................................................................... 9 Natural Conditions….................................................................................................. 17 Surface Hydrology….................................................................................................. 19 Geological Hazards.................................................................................................... 21 SERVICE FACTORS…............................................................................................................ 23 Community Resources.............................................................................................. 23 Safety…………………….............................................................................................. 29 Utilities….……………….............................................................................................. 31 LAND USE………..…............................................................................................................ 37 Historical Sites and Places of Interest..................................................................... 37 Public Facilities…………………………...................................................................... 47 Zoning…....…….…………………………...................................................................... 48 OVERLAY DISTRICTS & REDEVELOPMENT……....................................................................... 48 Gaming Enterprise District Overlay……................................................................... 48 Las Vegas Boulevard Corridor…………................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 3……………............................................................................................................ 49 ISSUES AND CHALLENGES……………….……....................................................................... 49 Issues in South County……....……........................................................................... 49 CHAPTER 4……………............................................................................................................ 55 LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……….……....................................................................... 55 General……………….....……....……........................................................................... 55 Large Lot Residential………....……........................................................................... 58 Single Family Attached & Detached......................................................................... 60 Multiple Family Development………......................................................................... 63 Office Professional .………....……............................................................................. 65 Retail Commercial…..………....……........................................................................... 67 Commercial Tourist……...…....……........................................................................... 72 Business and Design/Research Park....................................................................... 76 Industrial……..………………....……........................................................................... 79 Mixed Use .................................................................................................................. 81 Transportation………………....……........................................................................... 85 Property Maintenance .............................................................................................. 86 Public Services and Facilities………....……............................................................. 117 I-15 Corridor Policies ............................................................................................... 94 Sustainability ............................................................................................................ 98 Natural Environment.………....……........................................................................... 102 Surface and Groundwater…....……........................................................................... 103 Wastewater…………..………....……........................................................................... 104 Conservation………...………....……........................................................................... 105 Air Quality……………………....……........................................................................... 106 CAL-NEV-ARI LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……............................................................. 107 ELDORADO VALLEY LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……..................................................... 109 GOODSPRINGS LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……............................................................ 111 NELSON LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……...................................................................... 113 PALM GARDENS LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….…….…..................................................... 114 PRIMM LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……........................................................................ 115 South County Land Use Plan – December 5, 2012 iii SANDY VALLEY LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……........................................................... 116 SEARCHLIGHT LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES………………..…….......................................... 118 SLOAN LAND USE GOALS & POLICIES….……………….…..................................................... 120 LAND USE MAP….……………………………………….…..................................................... 123 Land Use Categories…....……….…........................................................................... 124 CHAPTER 5……………............................................................................................................ 131 Plan Implementation……………..……………..…………............................................ 131 GLOSSARY……………............................................................................................................ 135 iv Figures & Maps POPULATION AND GROWTH RATES Cal-Nev-Ari - 1990 – 2011.................................................................................................... 9 Goodsprings - 1990 – 2011.................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southern US 95 & US 93
    UNLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNINGLV RESEARCH CORRIDOR PLAN INCLUDES US 95 SOUTH FROM RAILROAD PASS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE LINE, US 93 TO Southern US 95 and US 93 HOOVER DAM AND US outhern 95 and 93 95 NORTH OF I-215 TO THE CLARK COUNTY LINE WEST OF INDIAN landscapelandscape andand aestheticsaesthetics corridorcorridor planplan SPRINGS DESIGN WORKSHOP PLACES Sand County Studios JW Zunino & Associates CH2MHill December 15, 2006 Southern US 95 and US 93 corridor plan MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR OF NEVADA MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION On June 6, 2002, the Nevada Department of Transportation adopted Landscape and aesthetics are an integral part of the design in as policy, “Pattern and Palette of Place: A Landscape and Aesthetics building and retrofitting our highway system. This Landscape and Master Plan for the Nevada State Highway System.” The second phase Aesthetics Corridor Plan for US 95 and US 93 in Southern Nevada of planning is complete. The Landscape and Aesthetics Corridor helps realize our vision for the future appearance of our highways. Plan represents a significant step forward for the Landscape and The plan will provide the guidance for our own design teams, and Aesthetics program created by the Master Plan because it involves it will help Nevada’s citizens participate in formulating context- local public agencies and citizens in the planning process. Now, sensitive solutions for today’s transportation needs. Together, Nevada’s highways truly represent the State and its people. The we will ensure our highways reflect Nevada’s distinctive heritage, Corridor Plan will be the primary management tool for use in landscape, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus Agassizii) Genetic Connectivity
    University of Nevada, Reno Connecting the Plots: Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) Genetic Connectivity A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Geography By Kirsten Erika Dutcher Dr. Jill S. Heaton, Dissertation Advisor May 2020 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by KIRSTEN ERIKA DUTCHER entitled Connecting the Plots: Anthropogenic Disturbance and Mojave Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) Genetic Connectivity be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Jill S. Heaton, Ph.D. Advisor Kenneth E. Nussear, Ph.D. Committee Member Scott D. Bassett, Ph.D. Committee Member Amy G. Vandergast, Ph.D. Committee Member Marjorie D. Matocq, Ph.D. Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean Graduate School May, 2020 i ABSTRACT Habitat disturbance impedes connectivity for native populations by altering natural movement patterns, significantly increasing the risk of population decline. The Mojave Desert historically exhibited high ecological connectivity, but human presence has increased recently, as has habitat disturbance. Human land use primarily occurs in Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) habitat posing risks to the federally threatened species, which has declined as a result. As threats intensify, so does the need to protect tortoise habitat and connectivity. Functional corridors require appropriate habitat amounts and population densities, as individuals may need time to achieve connectivity and find mates. Developments in tortoise habitat have not been well studied, and understanding the relationship between barriers, corridors, population density, and gene flow is an important step towards species recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Solar Lease Revenues
    LIVE WORK PLAY RETIRE TURNING LAND INTO REVENUES: UNDERSTANDING SOLAR LEASE REVENUES Reprint Date: August 25, 2020 Mayor Kiernan McManus Council Member Council Member Council Member Council Member Mayor pro tem Claudia Bridges Tracy Folda Judith A. Hoskins James Howard Adams City Manager Finance Director Alfonso Noyola, ICMA-CM Diane Pelletier, CPA Boulder City Revenue Overview Table of Contents Unlike most other municipalities and counties in Nevada, the revenue stream for Boulder City does not include the lucrative Some History . gaming tax. Prior to the recession of 2007 - 2009, the City’s • 4 • revenue stream did not have a sizable amount of monies from land leases. With the recent focus by California and more Charter/Ordinance Requirements recently at the national level on renewable energy development, • 4 • the City was in a key position to take advantage of its unique Land Lease Process position for solar development by leasing city-owned land for • 6 • energy production. Because of those prudent actions, today the Energy Lease Revenue History solar lease revenues equate to roughly 28% to 34% of the City’s • 7 • overall revenue stream to support vital governmental functions. Energy Lease Revenue Projections • • But is Land Lease Revenue Stable? 9 A common question posed to our City Council surrounds the Energy Lease Revenue Potential stability of land lease revenues. Traditional commercial or • 9 • residential land leases have many risks, as the tenants are Overall Energy Lease Revenue subject to market conditions or changes in employment. And History and Projections with recessions, these types of leases are common casualties • 10 • of a downturn in the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Communityw O 7 S 0 B &
    INC PULATION REA PO DU SE RING U 20 NL % 13 2 V EN 7, 5 RO 8 . L 2 C LM 4 S 7 N EN 8 Y 062,2 3 T , 5 E 6 T E 3 NR , G 2 N O 6 A % EW N L I R COM S LM 2 G VE E C E 9 N A A RS N N I L RE T A .6 FR 3 V 3 I N 3 O , M E 3 L IO NR 9 U T OL F A LM 5 N E O S E ALIFO N L C R T R N M T A I U 4 U A S Q . 7 T E A O . o C 0 R C 0 0 9 E M 1 A P 9 FO 0 F G M IN R N O E T O T IN H 1 S S T E N O U E F C O 8 1 I C H G . R O S A 9 T R T N 7 I E 9 M V 0 E A 6 Y S R $ T S 3,086,745,000(ASSISTED BY LVGEA) S E NEW COMPANIES U N I D 26 S N I ANNUAL HOME SALES N 7 U 4 R EMPLOYMENT 5 T E E , COMMUNITYW O 7 S 0 B & 4 A T , 5 L 7 las vegasA perspective E 895,700 , 9.5% 6 L 7 6 UNEMPLOYMENT 4 0 RATE 6 E M M IS E LU A R LUM VO P TOU VO R M A CO ITOR E L R M VIS G TE S A T M N O M V E 6 H O G M ER M SS O $ .
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945)
    World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945) HPF Tracking No.: P14AS00012(3) Prepared for: The city of Las Vegas Development Services Center and Historic Preservation Commission Prepared by: Greta J. Rayle, M.A., RPA and Helana Ruter, M.A. Logan Simpson 3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 235 Las Vegas, NV 89169 June 2015 LSD Technical Report No. 145648 The archival research and windshield survey of historic properties that is the subject of this historic context on World War II era residential housing in the city of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada has been financed in whole or part with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the State Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the State Historic Preservation Office. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Chief, Office of Equal Opportunity Programs, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW (2740), Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Aces
    Welcome to LasVegasRelocation Guide to Southern Nevada Trusted everywhere every day. Contents LAS VEGAS VALLEY INFORMATION Climate & Population ......................................................4 Demographics ..................................................................5 Zip Code Map ..................................................................6 Newcomer Resources .......................................................7 Utility Information ...........................................................8 DMV/ Voting ....................................................................9 Employment ...................................................................10 Transportation ................................................................11 Housing ..........................................................................12 Museums/ Galleries .......................................................13 Libraries .........................................................................14 Hospitals ........................................................................15 Churches ........................................................................16 Youth Activities ..............................................................18 Senior Services ...............................................................19 Parks ...............................................................................20 Outdoor Recreation Activities ........................................21 Golfing ...........................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E302 HON. JIM GIBBONS
    E302 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks March 14, 2000 drinking water delivery options. Only 8.3% We urge you to support H.R. 1695. of Aviation's efforts to acquire Ivanpah Val- said they would rather have their drinking Sincerely, ley land for an airport; and be it further water from a water utility company. This legis- JEFFREY GOODELL, Resolved, that the Las Vegas Chamber of Vice President, Government Affairs. Commerce as the representative of more lation gives consumers the ability to pay for than 6,000 member businesses in Southern new or refurbished individual household water Nevada, encourages the House of Representa- well systems with convenient monthly pay- AMERICAN ASSOCIATION tives to pass H.R. 1695, providing the Bureau ments, like other utility bills. OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES, of Land Management with the authority to Alexandria, VA, March 3, 2000. It is my understanding, Mr. Speaker, that or- sell the identified land in the Ivanpah Valley Hon. JAMES GIBBONS, ganizations like the National Ground Water to Clark County; and be it further U.S. Representative, Cannon House Office Resolved, that copies of this Resolution be Association, a group that has a long and dis- Building, Washington, DC. transmitted to Nevada's Congressional dele- tinguished record preserving and protecting DEAR REPRESENTATIVE GIBBONS: The U.S. gation. America's precious ground water resources, House of Representatives will shortly be con- DONALD L. ``PAT'' SHALMY, strongly endorses this legislation. It is my sidering H.R. 1695, which would permit Clark President General Manager. hope that other organizations and commu- County, Nevada to purchase 6,500 acres of federal land in the Ivanpah Valley for a fu- nities that support common sense, innovative ture commercial airport site.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave National Preserve Management Plan for Developed
    Mojave National Preserve—Management Plan for Developed Water Resources CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Introduction This chapter describes the unique factors that influence water resource management in the Preserve and the resources that could be affected by the implementation of any of the alternatives described in Chapter 2: Alternatives. The resource descriptions provided in this chapter serve as a baseline to compare the potential effects of the management actions proposed in the alternatives. The following resource topics are described in this chapter: • Environmental Setting • Cultural Resources • Water Resources • Wilderness Character • Wildlife Environmental setting and water resources are important for context and are foundational for water resource management, but are not resources that are analyzed for effects. Resource issues that were considered and dismissed from further analysis are listed in Chapter 1: Purpose of and Need for Action and are not discussed further in this EA. A description of the effects of the proposed alternatives on wildlife, cultural resources, and wilderness character is presented in Chapter 4: Environmental Consequences. Environmental Setting The Preserve includes an ecologically diverse yet fragile desert ecosystem consisting of vegetative attributes that are unique to the Mojave Desert, as well as components of the Great Basin and Sonoran Deserts. Topography The topography of the Preserve is characteristic of the mountain and basin physiographic pattern, with tall mountain ranges separated by corresponding valleys filled with alluvial sediments. Primary mountain ranges in the Preserve, from west to east, include the Granite, Kelso, Providence, Clark, New York, and Piute Mountains. Major alluvial valleys include Soda Lake (dry lake bed), Shadow Valley, Ivanpah Valley, Lanfair Valley, and Fenner Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Things to Do in and Around Las Vegas
    SOHA 2020: A Las Vegas Guide 30 min. Red Rock Canyon National prehistory and history of the park and nearby Things to Do in and Conservation Area presents awe-inspiring views region. The park features many short and easy most wouldn't expect to see near a major hikes for a variety of skill levels featuring Around Las Vegas metropolitan city. In contrast to the bright lights petroglyphs, slot canyons, movie sets, domes, and hype of the Strip, Red Rock offers desert and many other unique rock formations. Make beauty, towering red cliffs and abundant sure to bring water. $10 per vehicle. Public Lands wildlife. $15 per vehicle Las Vegas is surrounded by a sea of federal land Sloan Canyon National Recreation Area and public spaces. Beyond the lights and buzz of the Las Vegas strip, Southern Nevada has a 40 min. Sloan Canyon National Conservation Museums diverse array of public lands from rain islands to Area’s 48,438 acres provide peace and solitude endangered habitats, from the oldest trees on for those who visit the unique scenic and Although opulent casinos and overblown pools earth, to cartoonish red slot canyons and rock geologic features and extraordinary cultural have helped put Las Vegas on the map, there is formations. These protected locations display resources. The centerpiece of the area is the much more to the city, including its collection both the natural and human history of an often Sloan Canyon Petroglyph Site, one of the most of Museums. From the Neon Museum to the misunderstood space. significant cultural resources in Southern National Atomic Testing Museum, these venues Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada, Nevada Digital Newspaper Project
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the NEH Division of Preservation and Access application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/divisions/preservation for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Preservation and Access staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Nevada Digital Newspaper Project Institution: University of Nevada Project Director: Jason Vaughn Grant Program: National Digital Newspaper Program 400 7th Street, SW, Floor 4, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8570 F 202.606.8639 E [email protected] www.neh.gov History and Scope of Project Notable Historic Events in Nevada (1836‐1922) Nevada’s history from its earliest settlements, territorial establishment and statehood, until 1922, encompasses in that relatively brief period a microcosm of the history of the modern American west. Nevada found itself at a crossroads of national and regional developments. While awash with gold, silver, and other minerals, it took the emergence of a national system of transportation and national markets to capitalize those ore deposits, and by so doing vitalize what was an arid and sparsely populated region.
    [Show full text]