DOCSLIB.ORG

Agri-Environmental Policies and Their Effectiveness in Norway, Austria, Bavaria, France, Switzerland and Wales: Review and Recommendations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agri-Environmental Policies and Their Effectiveness in Norway, Austria, Bavaria, France, Switzerland and Wales: Review and Recommendations Report 11/2014 Agri-environmental policies and their effectiveness in Norway, Austria, Bavaria, France, Switzerland and Wales: Review and recommendations Agri-environmental policies Report from Skog og landskap 11/2014 Agri-environmental policies and their effectiveness in Norway, Austria, Bavaria, France, Switzerland and Wales: Review and recommendations Christina Blumentrath, Grete Stokstad, Wenche Dramstad & Sebastian Eiter ISSN 1891-7933 ISBN 978-82-311-0217-5 Cover photos: Top left: France (W. Dramstad) Top right: Austria (O. Bender) Centre left: Norway (S. Eiter) Centre right: Bavaria (N. Siebrecht) Bottom left: Wales (S. Eiter) Bottom right: Switzerland (S. Eiter) 1 Agri-environmental policies Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... 2 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................5 1.1 Aim and scope of this review ...............................................................................................6 1.2 Method ..........................................................................................................................................7 2 Support measures in European agricultural policies ............................. 9 2.1 The Norwegian subsidy system ...........................................................................................9 2.2 Rural development policies ................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Measures of importance for biodiversity, cultural heritage, landscape scenery, and recreation .................................................................................. 15 3 Agricultural subsidies for biodiversity .....................................................20 3.1 Measures targeted at biodiversity ................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Species diversity ........................................................................................................ 21 3.1.2 Habitat diversity ........................................................................................................ 25 3.1.3 Genetic diversity ....................................................................................................... 28 3.2 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................30 4 Agricultural subsidies for cultural heritage ........................................... 32 4.1 Rural Development Plans ................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Other measures ..................................................................................................................... 35 4.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 35 5 Agricultural subsidies for landscape scenery and recreation ............ 37 5.1 Maintaining cultural landscapes ...................................................................................... 38 5.2 Linear landscape elements ................................................................................................. 42 5.3 Public access to the countryside ....................................................................................44 5.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 45 6 Overall conclusions ......................................................................................46 6.1 European agricultural support – complex structure but similar aims ................46 6.2 RDP as a driving force for changes in landscapes, biodiversity and cultural heritage ....................................................................................................................46 6.3 Criticisms of scheme design and evaluation difficulties ........................................ 47 6.4 Acceptance of agricultural support ...............................................................................49 6.5 Scheme success stories and future challenges: "simple" measures and "better" evaluation – in Norway and internationally .................................................49 7 References ......................................................................................................52 2 Agri-environmental policies Acknowledgements C.B. has conducted the major part of the Heinrich von Thünen-Institut, Germany), S. international literature review and intervi- Lauber (Eidgenössische Forschungsan- ews, and compiled most of the stalt WSL, Switzerland), T. Little (Organic manuscript. G.S. has written the introduc- Centre, Wales), F. Lücke (LBV e.V., Bava- tory sections about Norway. W.D. and S.E. ria), C. Marguerat (Eidgenössisches Volks- have supervised the work and revised the wirtschaftsdepartement, Bundesamt für manuscript. They also were responsible Landwirtschaft, Switzerland), K. Naumann for the work as Head of Section and pro- (Staatsministerium für Ernährung, Land- ject leader, respectively. wirtschaft und Forsten, Bavaria), H. Rapey (Cemagref Clermont-Ferrand, France), M. The authors thank the following persons Stadler (Austrian Federal Ministry of Agri- for providing very useful information: C. culture, Forestry, Environment and Water Badertscher (Bundesamt für Land- Management), P. Théodore (DRAAF wirtschaft, Switzerland), A. Bartel Rhône-Alpes, France), L. Treffler (Staats- (Umweltbundesamt, Austria), A. Colom- ministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft bani (Agreste, France), B. Dechambre und Forsten, Bavaria), and J. Williams (Ministère de l'Alimentation de l'Agricul- (Welsh Assembly Government). Thanks ture et de la Pêche, France), K. Eckstein are also due to Gesine Jiménez Martínez (TU Weihenstephan, Bavaria), M. Groier for assistance with making the document (Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen, ready for publication, and to the different Austria), W. Güthler (Staatsministerium für photographers for permission to use their Umwelt und Gesundheit, Bavaria), G. Heu- images. The study was financed by the singer (Landesamt für Umwelt, Bavaria), Research Council of Norway, grant no. Neil Howard (Department for Rural Affairs 186911. and Heritage, Wales), J.-C. Jauneau (ISARA Lyon, France), S. Klimek (Johann 3 Abstract This review identifies ‘successful’ policies small areas, and for requiring a great deal for biodiversity, cultural heritage, and of organization and implementation work. landscape scenery and recreation in In terms of future developments of the Austria, France, Bavaria (Germany), Wales Norwegian agricultural and agri-environ- (UK), and Switzerland, and a comparison mental subsidy system we recommend with current efforts in Norway. All of these examining the following particular policies countries face similar risks and challenges, more closely: the Organic Farming mostly with regard to mountain areas. scheme in Austria, the Welsh whole-farm Sources used for the analysis were the scheme Tir Gofal, and the Austrian, Bava- evaluations of the national Rural Develop- rian and Swiss measures for cultural lands- ment Plans, and the midway evaluation cape maintenance. and national ex-post evaluations of the Since no ‘best practice’ or ‘standard CAP programme period 2000–2006. An design’ of agricultural support schemes evaluation of the Swiss Direct Payment has been recognized on an international System was available from 2009, as well as level to date, an enhanced evaluation information about further development system will be as important as new and from 2011. Scientific papers and other offi- adjusted schemes. Monitoring data suita- cial reports by, e.g., the OECD, the Euro- ble for comparison should be collected, pean Commission and the European Envi- based on internationally defined indica- ronmental Agency, were used as well. tors. For the time being, we suggest “dou- Expert interviews were conducted by tele- ble-tracked” agri-environmental support: phone and e-mail. mainly measures that have proved to be Measures deemed particularly successful effective; but also measures where posi- often had very specific aims, included tive effects are considered very likely due local information, appeared to involve to well-known cause-effect relationships, fairly simple application and organization even though they may not yet have been requirements, were developed and desig- thoroughly documented and approved, ned in cooperation with farmers and were e.g. because of their long-term character adapted to local characteristics or challen- or due to weaknesses in monitoring and ges. Measures considered less successful evaluation. were criticized for being unfair in terms of regional repartition of grants, for lacking transparency, for being applied only to Keywords: Agricultural subsidies, Biodiversity, Cultural heritage, Landscape scenery, Recreation 1 Introduction Expressed aims of Norwegian agricultural policy have been, and still are, food secu- Box 1: PSE rity and preventing loss of the limited agri- The Producers Support Estimate is an indicator of agricultural support de- veloped by the OECD. It is an account of the monetary value of different cultural land resource in Norway (only types
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Environmental Benefits Supplied by Agri-Environment Schemes
    A review of environmental benefits supplied by agri-environment schemes FST20/79/041 Nigel Boatman, Carmel Ramwell, Hazel Parry, Naomi Jones, Julie Bishop, Peter Gaskell, Christopher Short, Jane Mills & Janet Dwyer 15 August 2008 www.lupg.org.uk The Land Use Policy Group The Land Use Policy Group (LUPG) of the UK statutory nature conservation, countryside and environment agencies comprises the Countryside Council for Wales, Natural England, Environment Agency, Northern Ireland Environment Agency, Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Scottish Natural Heritage. The LUPG aims to advise on policy matters of common concern related to agriculture, woodlands and other rural land uses. It seeks to improve understanding of the pros and cons of policy mechanisms related to land use, particularly farming and forestry; to develop a common view of desirable reforms to existing policies; and to promote these views. www.lupg.org.uk Countryside Council for Wales The Countryside Council for Wales champions the environment and landscapes of Wales and its coastal waters as sources of natural and cultural riches, as a foundation for economic and social activity, and as a place for leisure and learning opportunities. It aims to make the environment a valued part of everyone's life in Wales. www.ccw.gov.uk Natural England Natural England is the statutory body working to conserve and enhance England's natural environment, for its intrinsic value, the wellbeing and enjoyment of people and the economic prosperity that it brings. Its role is to ensure that England's unique natural environment, including its land, flora and fauna, freshwater and marine environments, geology and soils are protected and improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Livestock Crops & Stick Making
    GOWER AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY 8 SUNDAY 5th AUGUST 2018 Penrice Castle Park, Reynoldston, Gower GROWINGLIVESTOCK CROPS & STICK MAKING SHOWGROUND HOLDING NO: 59/152/8002 www.gowershow.co.uk GOWER AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY SECTION SECRETARIES For further information or other section schedules please contact the relevant Secretary: Schedules can also be downloaded from www.gowershow.co.uk Livestock Miss Sian Tucker (and enquiries) The Beeches, Horton, Gower SA3 1LB Tel: 01792 390207/07812 109555 Eve: 01792 390186 Sticks Mr G Davies Mas y Deri, Mwrw Road, Llangennech, Llanelli SA14 8YR Tel: 01554 821003 Crops Mr Richard Gordon Ilston Green, Ilston, Gower, SA2 7LD Tel: 01792 371222 Horses Mrs K Bowdler 27 Elba Street, Gowerton, Swansea SA4 3EE Tel: 01792 873514 Trade Stands Mr John Furneaux (and enquiries) Thurba Cottage, Rhossili, Gower SA3 1PH Tel: 01792 390754 Horticulture Mrs E Gordon Ilston Green, Ilston, Gower SA2 7LD Tel: 01792 371222 Open Cookery Mrs D Furneaux Thurba Cottage, Rhossili SA3 1PH Tel: 01792 390754 Poultry Mr P Tucker The Beach, Beach Road, Penclawdd SA4 3YN Tel: 01792 850496 Thanks for the photo’s to David Bailey (www.davidbaileyphotographywales.co.uk) & Ms S Tucker. 2 GOWER AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY LIST OF JUDGES CATTLE Welsh Black : TBA Hereford: TBA Beef Cattle British : Mr Edd Morgan, Llysnewydd, Cilycwm, Llandovery Beef Cattle Continental: Mr John Leyshon, Cefn Faes Farm, Bryn Coch, Neath Commercial Cattle: Mr John Leyshon, Cefn Faes Farm, Bryn Coch, Neath Dairy Cattle: Mr Geraint Thomas, Tyreglwys Farm, Llangennech, Llanelli
    [Show full text]
  • "First Report on the State of the World's Animal Genetic Resources"
    Country Report of Australia for the FAO First Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1 ASSESSING THE STATE OF AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY THE FARM ANIMAL SECTOR IN AUSTRALIA.................................................................................7 1.1 OVERVIEW OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND RELATED ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY. ......................................................................................................7 Australian Agriculture - general context .....................................................................................7 Australia's agricultural sector: production systems, diversity and outputs.................................8 Australian livestock production ...................................................................................................9 1.2 ASSESSING THE STATE OF CONSERVATION OF FARM ANIMAL BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY..............10 Major agricultural species in Australia.....................................................................................10 Conservation status of important agricultural species in Australia..........................................11 Characterisation and information systems ................................................................................12 1.3 ASSESSING THE STATE OF UTILISATION OF FARM ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES IN AUSTRALIA. ........................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Historic, Archived Document Do Not Assume Content Reflects Current
    Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BUREAU OF ANIMAL INDUSTRY.—CIRCULAR NO. 104. A D. MELVIN, CHIEF OF BUREAU. WELSH BLACK CATTLK.' By JOHN ROBERTS, Of the Editorial Office, Bureau of Animal Industry. INTRODUCTION. The Welsh breed of cattle is considered a very valuable one in Great Britain. The cows are good milkers, but the breed is chiefly famous for its feeding qualities and the admitted excellence of the carcass, the latter being a prime favorite with English butchers. If we grant that the modern beef animal should be considered mainly from the point of view of economy in production, the above characteristics of the Welsh breed seem to entitle it to consideration. Youatt, writing of Welsh cattle seventy years ago, said: Great Britain does not afford a more useful animal. * * * They combine to a considerable degree, and as far, perhaps, as they can be combined, the two opposite qualities of being very fair milkers with a propensity to fatten. The meat is generally beautifully marbled. It is equal to that of the Scotch cattle, and some epicures prefer it. They thrive in every situation. They will live where others starve, and they will rapidly outstrip most others when they have plenty of good pasture. * * * Great numbers of them are brought to the London market. They stand their journey well and find a ready sale, for they rarely disappoint the butcher, but on the contrary prove better than appearance and touch indicate. The above description seems to apply equally well to the present day.
    [Show full text]
  • Farming – Bringing Wales Together
    Farming – Bringing Wales Together An illustration of how Welsh agriculture delivers the Well-being of Future Generations Act FOREWoRD Agriculture’s contribution to the economic, environmental, resources, providing the stunning backdrop – our treasured social and cultural well-being of Wales is unrivalled. Welsh landscape – for the tourism and recreation sector in Farming’s impression on Wales’ landscape, heritage and Wales, worth over £2.8bn. sense of place over generations is unsurpassed. Through Welsh farmers are also the essence of Wales’ culture and this document, NFU Cymru is proud to showcase every community. The prevalence of the Welsh language within aspect of what farming means to Wales - the significance of the farming sector is higher than in any other sector, the sector to all aspects of Welsh life. keeping the language alive in many rural populations Framed around the seven well-being goals enshrined in across Wales. Members of the agricultural industry are often the Well-being of Future Generations Act 2015, NFU Cymru at the heart of many rural communities across the country, has sourced case studies from within its membership, each as part of community groups, or in voluntary or leadership demonstrating the specific contributions the industry roles throughout rural Wales. makes to the well-being of the people of Wales and further Through ‘Farming- Bringing Wales Together’, NFU Cymru afield, now and in the future. provides a snapshot of the important work done by farmers These real life, everyday examples of innovation, across Wales and their contribution to the economic, commitment and sheer hard work taking place on farms environmental, social and cultural well-being of Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bug Farm
    Rhôs Pasture and wildflower meadows at The Bug Farm In 2015, a 100 acre ‘Bug Farm’ at Lower But what is a Bug Farm? In December 2013, Harglodd Farm in St Davids, Pembrokeshire Sarah, with assistance from her family, won the Save Our Magnificent Meadows bought the farm which was the original family ‘Meadow Maker of the Year’ award for Wales. farm. She wished to restore the wildlife The prize was awarded for work carried out corridor linking the two SSSIs and encourage by Bug Farm owner, Dr Sarah Beynon, for her wildlife alongside running a research, farming work on creating a 45 acre habitat corridor and educational business. In June 2016, The with wet and dry meadows, heath, rhôs Bug Farm also launched officially as a visitor pasture and marshy grassland. It provides a attraction all about invertebrates. Sarah link between two Sites of Special Scientific herself is an academic ecologist and Interest (SSSI) – Dowrog Common SSSI and St entomologist with a love of farming and David’s Airfields Heaths SSSI - both conservation who decided to combine these outstanding areas of acid grassland and passions and start her own innovative venture lowland heathland. at home in West Wales! Continuing the Dowrog Common SSSI Farm buildings, tropical bug zoo, bug museum, art gallery, shop, and Grub Kitchen Proposed educational meadow as part of The Bug Farm Trail St David’s Heaths SSSI Wildflower meadows Rhôs Marshy grassland pasture Aerial photo image from 2009 showing the neighbouring SSSIs and The Bug Farm with the species-rich habitats. Google Earth Image © 2016 Getmapping plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Genetic Resources Information Bulletin
    The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Les appellations employées dans cette publication et la présentation des données qui y figurent n’impliquent de la part de l’Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture aucune prise de position quant au statut juridique des pays, territoires, villes ou zones, ou de leurs autorités, ni quant au tracé de leurs frontières ou limites. Las denominaciones empleadas en esta publicación y la forma en que aparecen presentados los datos que contiene no implican de parte de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades o zonas, o de sus autoridades, ni respecto de la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and the extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. Tous droits réservés. Aucune partie de cette publication ne peut être reproduite, mise en mémoire dans un système de recherche documentaire ni transmise sous quelque forme ou par quelque procédé que ce soit: électronique, mécanique, par photocopie ou autre, sans autorisation préalable du détenteur des droits d’auteur.
    [Show full text]
  • CATAIR Appendix
    CBP and Trade Automated Interface Requirements Appendix: PGA February 12, 2021 Pub # 0875-0419 Contents Table of Changes .................................................................................................................................................... 4 PG01 – Agency Program Codes ........................................................................................................................... 18 PG01 – Government Agency Processing Codes ................................................................................................... 22 PG01 – Electronic Image Submitted Codes.......................................................................................................... 26 PG01 – Globally Unique Product Identification Code Qualifiers ........................................................................ 26 PG01 – Correction Indicators* ............................................................................................................................. 26 PG02 – Product Code Qualifiers........................................................................................................................... 28 PG04 – Units of Measure ...................................................................................................................................... 30 PG05 – Scientific Species Code ........................................................................................................................... 31 PG05 – FWS Wildlife Description Codes ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Decision of 26 August 2009 Amending Decision 2006/139
    27.8.2009 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 224/15 COMMISSION DECISION of 26 August 2009 amending Decision 2006/139/EC as regards its period of applicability and the list of authorities in Canada approved for keeping a herdbook or register of certain animals (notified under document C(2009) 6522) (Text with EEA relevance) (2009/623/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (3) The entry for Bulgaria in the Annex to Decision 2006/139/EC became obsolete with the accession of Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European that Member State and should therefore be deleted for Community, the sake of legal clarity. (4) In addition, Canada has requested to update several Having regard to Council Directive 94/28/EC of 23 June 1994 entries for that country in the Annex to Decision laying down the principles relating to the zootechnical and 2006/139/EC. genealogical conditions applicable to imports from third countries of animals, their semen, ova and embryos, and (5) Canada has provided guarantees regarding compliance amending Directive 77/504/EEC on pure-bred breeding with the relevant requirements laid down in 1 animals of the bovine species ( ), and in particular Article 3 Community legislation and, in particular those laid thereof, down in Directive 94/28/EC. Whereas: (6) Decision 2006/139/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. (1) Commission Decision 2006/139/EC of 7 February 2006 implementing Council Directive 94/28/EC as regards a (7) The measures provided for in this Decision are in list of authorities in third countries approved for the accordance with the opinion of the Standing keeping of a herdbook or register of certain animals ( 2 ) Committee on Zootechnics, provides that Member States are to authorise the importation of breeding animals of certain species, their HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: semen, ova and embryos as ‘pure-bred’ or ‘hybrid’ only if they are entered or registered in a herdbook or register Article 1 kept by an authority approved for that purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Disabling Neuropsychiatric Disease in Farmers Exposed to Organophosphates Phase 1
    DISABLING NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE IN FARMERS EXPOSED TO ORGANOPHOSPHATES: PHASE 1: THE STUDY OF HEALTH IN AGRICULTURAL WORK COHORT Project number VM02115 Project investigators Dr AC Povey, Professor RM Agius, Occupational and Environmental Health Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Dr R McNamee, Biostatistics, Informatics and Health Economics Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester Professor A Burns, Professor F Creed, Psychiatry Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester Professor D Neary, Clinical Neurosciences Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester IN CONFIDENCE TO SPONSORS DATE: 23/11/07 1 Foreword This report has been prepared to provide information on the SHAW study which has examined the health effects of low dose chronic exposure to organophosphates in sheep farmers with the UK. It includes a detailed description of the study design and methodology used together with the results of the phase 1 of the study. The results from the second phase of the study will be appended as they and those questions subsequent to this report are completed. 2 Contents Foreword 2 Contents 3 List of Tables 5 List of Figures 7 List of Appendices 8 Executive Summary 10 1.0 Introduction 12 1.1 Aims and objectives of the present study 13 2.0 Materials and Methods 14 2.1 Study design 14 2.2 Study population 14 2.2.1 Database entry, merging and cleaning 14 2.2.2 Addition of postcodes and telephone
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Lleyn Sweep for Local Sheep? Breed Societies and the Geographies of Welsh Livestock
    A Lleyn Sweep for Local Sheep? Breed Societies and the Geographies of Welsh Livestock Richard Yarwood* and Nick Evans+ * School of Geography, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA. [email protected] 01752 233083 + Centre for Rural Research Department of Applied Sciences, Geography and Archaeology, University College Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester, WR2 6AJ. 01905 855197 [email protected] Abstract This paper uses Bourdieu’s (1977) concept of habitus to examine human-animal relationships within capitalist agricultural systems. The first part of the paper examines how Bourdieu’s ideas have been used by academics to provide insights into the ways that livestock affect and are affected by farming practice. The second part builds on these conceptual, empirical and policy insights by examining some of the national and international social networks that contribute to human-animal relationships in capitalistic farming. It focuses on a case study of Welsh livestock and, in particular, the historic and contemporary roles that breed societies play in the imagination of farm animals and the creation of capitals in agriculture. 1 A Lleyn Sweep for Local Sheep? Breed Societies and the Geographies of Welsh Livestock ‘The mountain sheep are sweeter, But the valley sheep are fatter; And so we deemed it meeter To take away the latter.’ „The War-Song of the Dinas Vawr‟ Thomas Love Peacock (1829) Introduction The relationships between animals, locality and society have come under increased scrutiny by geographers (Philo, 1995; Wolch and Emel, 1995; Wolch, 1998; Philo and Wilbert, 2000). An emerging body of literature is critically reappraising the place of animals within capitalist agricultural systems, reflecting the three main trajectories of animal geography (Whatmore, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Show Lincolnshire Show
    THE 2017 LINCOLNSHIRELINCOLNSHIRE SHOWSHOW 21st - 22nd June LIVESTOCK SCHEDULE CLOSING DATE FOR ENTRIES Wednesday 26th April LINCOLNSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY Patron: Mr. T E D Dennis President: Mr. R M Battle Honorary Show Director: Mr. A C Read Livestock Prize Schedule 21st - 22nd June, 2017 CLOSING DATE FOR ENTRIES: Wednesday 26th April 2017 No LATE ENTRIES will be accepted ————————— Please send your ENTRIES to: Lincolnshire Agricultural Society Lincolnshire Showground Grange-de-lings Lincoln LN2 2NA Tel (01522) 522900 Fax (01522) 520345 e-mail: [email protected] 1 We would like to say thank you to the following Sponsors and Supporters A. Wright and Son A. W. Curtis and Sons Ltd Beeswax Farming Ltd D M Boyles Branston Ltd British Wool Marketing Board Brown Butlin Group Ltd Clydesdale Yorkshire Bank Daniel Crane Sporting Art Ltd Duckworth Isuzu Duckworth Landrover Equip Rasen Ltd Farmacy PLC Germains Seeds Harold Woolgar Insurance Henson Franklyn Karu Ltd Langleys Solicitors Lincolnshire Co-op Lincolnshire Media Lincolnshire Shire Horse Association Masons Chartered Surveyors Melton Mowbray Livestock Market Pentagon Group Pollock Associates Pygott & Crone Robert Bell & Co Saul Fairholm Chartered Accountants Savills Semex (UK Sales) Ltd Sparkhouse Streets Chartered Accountants The University of Lincoln The Willows Garden Centre & Restaurant Thompson & Richardson Lincoln Thurlby Motors TSV Services Ltd Witham Oil & Paint Woldgrain Storage Ltd Woldmarsh Yorkshire Dales Ice Cream Ltd 2 INDEX CATTLE Page Beef Aberdeen Angus . 22 Beef Shorthorn . 18 British Blue . 14 British Blonde . 21 British Charolais. 15 British Limousin . 17 Commercial Cattle. 29 Inter-Breed Championship . 27 Lincoln Red. 11 Longhorn . 19 Other Pure Continental Breeds .
    [Show full text]