DOCSLIB.ORG

Dumbarton Rail Corridor Project Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Dumbarton Rail Corridor Project Update January 8, 2020 Cross Bay Transit Partners Who We Are • Facebook and Plenary Group are collaborating on District the Dumbarton Corridor project through a new company, Cross Bay Transit Partners (CBTP) Facebook Cross Bay • CBTB and the District executed an Exclusive Transit Partners Negotiating Agreement (ENA) on August 14, 2018 Plenary Group • Current agreement is only for investigation, feasibility analysis and conduct of Exclusive Negotiating Agreement environmental process (CEQA/NEPA) 2 Exclusive ENA Process Negotiating Agreement (ENA) • San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans) • Cross Bay Transit Partners (CBTP / Developer) Environmental MOU Technical Financial Review (EIR / EIS) Negotiations Feasibility Analysis • Environmental • Federal • Preliminary Engineering • Financial Model Analysis FRA, FTA, USACE, USCG • Cost Estimating – Capital; • Cost & Revenue Benefits • Public Outreach • State Operation & Maintenance (O&M) • Financial Feasibility • Mitigation Measures • Local • Ridership Forecast Refinements ＞ EIR / EIS • Union Pacific Railroad • Selection and Negotiation ＞ Confirm Financial (UPRR) with Design-Builder Feasibility ＞ Record of Decision (ROD) ＞ MOU’s or other ＞ Confirm Technical preliminary agreements Feasibility LEGEND CBTP Decision Points Implementation ∙ Major Action > Milestone ＞ Go / No Go • Negotiation of LDDA if Go SamTrans Lead • Finalize Contracts SamTrans Support/Review • Financial Close CBTP Lead • Construction Commencement CBTP Support/Review 3 CBTP Cross Bay Transit Partners Project Leads Organizational Winsome Bowen Eliot Jamison Chart JV Support (Facebook + Plenary) Professional specialties Transportation and Federal and State Policy Regional Planning Communications Real Estate Strategy Corporate Counsel Finance and Funding Civil Engineering Strategy Stage 1: Engineering Rail Value Political Strategy Real Estate Market CEQA/NEPA Operations Legal Communications, Design Advisor Capture Federal Policy Brokers Analysis Confirmed: Prime Confirmed: Prime Confirmed Confirmed P3 Advisor Confirmed Open/TBD + specialty subs + specialty subs CEQA/NEPA Confirmed Stage 2: 2020 Q1 Rail Design-Build Rolling Stock Operator Contractor Open/TBD Open/TBD Open/TBD Partnership San Mateo County Transit District Facebook Cross Bay Transit Partners Plenary Group Local Agencies 5 BERKELEY Regional Passenger SAN FRANCISCO Rail Map OAKLAND DUBLIN DALY CITY SFO HAYWARD UNION CITY FOSTER Dumbarton Corridor CITY FREMONT Altamont Commuter Express (ACE) NEWARK BART REDWOOD CITY MENLO PARK Caltrain Amtrak Capitol Corridor Amtrak (other) Other rail MTN VIEW 6 SAN JOSE Regional Rail Oakland Connectiv Coliseum ity Livermore / Greenville Road Millbrae Dublin / Pleasanton Redwood City / Sequoia Newark Station Junction San Jose / Diridon Next Meeting: Mid- December 8 8 Transit Modes Under Consideration Regional Rail Light Rail Other Mass Transit Technology 9 Key Environmental Topics • Construction-related impacts • Biological and Wetland Resources • Noise and Vibration • Air Quality • Historic Resources/Section 4(f) • Hydrology/Water Quality • Transportation (Multi-modal analysis) 10 • Sea-Level Rise • Environmental Justice Introductory Meetings: Recap Four introductory public meetings were held in late February and early March in the Peninsula and East Bay: • Newark • Redwood City • Fremont • Menlo Park Purpose • Provide an overview of the project • Introduce the recently formed partnership Approximately 400 attendees 11 Community Feedback Key Themes Overall, feedback from the community was generally neutral to positive – with an expressed desire to proceed with the project. • Alternative Bus Options • Regional and Local Connectivity • Bicycle Infrastructure • Train Infrastructure • Communities as “Pass-Through” • Train Station Options • EIR and Environmental Concerns • Train Technology • Grade Separation • Transit Oriented Development • Project Costs and Allocation of • Noise and Vibration Funds 12 Transportation Public Sector Coordination Name Jurisdiction/Area of Interest Caltrain Caltrain Business Plan, Redwood City Station, HSR Altamont Corridor Express Fremont Centerville Station (ACE) Capitol Corridor (Amtrak) Coast Sub, Ardenwood Station Bay Area Rapid Transit Union City Station, Shinn Connection (BART) Union Pacific Railroad Commuter rail option, Coast Sub / Niles Sub / (UPRR) Oakland Sub Metropolitan Transportation Plan Bay Area 2050 process Commission (MTC) Alameda County Transportation Commission Southern Alameda County Integrated Rail Plan (ACTC) State Rail Plan coordination, Northern California CalSTA and Caltrans 16 Mega Region coordination of rail projects Resource Agencies Coordination Name Areas of Interest State Historic National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 Preservation Office Consultation State Lands Commission State lands lease agreement US Environmental Protection Clean Water Act and Section 309 (Clean Air Act) review of Agency NEPA documents Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation and US Fish & Wildlife Service Biological Opinion, Depredation Permit, Encroachment Permit Don Edwards SF Bay Wildlife Encroachment permit, owner of parcels within 300 feet of Refuge alignment US Coast Guard Bridge permits, technical design assistance SF Bay Conservation and 401 Water Quality Certification and other permits for Development Commission construction Nationwide Permit 14 or Individual Permit, Section 10 US Army Corps of Engineers Permit, Joint Aquatic Resource Permit Application Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation and National Marine Fisheries Biological Opinion, Essential Fish Habitat Consultation, 17 Service and Incidental Harassment Authorization/Letter of Authorization San Francisco Bay Regional 401 Water Quality Certification and other permits for Water Quality Control construction Board Stakeholder Engagement Name Key Issues Tri-Cities Proposed and planned projects related to development, (Fremont, Newark, Union corridors, and stations and connection to existing rail City) providers Fremont Connection to existing rail providers Newark Coordination with planned projects Union City Connection to Union City BART and associated TOD development Coordination with planned development. Focus on East Palo Alto transportation and reducing traffic congestion Coordination of area projects in environmental review and Menlo Park grade separations Redwood City Coordination with proposed and planned projects Belle Haven Grade separations and impacts to the community North Fair Oaks Community desire for local station Suburban Park Timeline, technology, and mitigations Note: meetings held to date 18 Lorelai Manor Community outreach, regular project updates Update on MTC Plan Bay Area 2050 MTC Dumbarton Rail SamTrans & CBTP MTC Action Timelin Corridor EIS Action es Milestones Major project update- Summer Submitted application for 2018 Summer 2018 Horizon Program in 9/2018 Transformative Projects Submitted project for NA Solicitation Fall 2018 consideration as transformative Project Performance Provided 2017 project Fall 2018 Methodology Development description Provided updated project description and cost estimate based on 2019 Q2-Q3 engineering analysis Analysis and Model Winter 2019- Pre-scoping Runs Summer 2019 Periodic updates provided to MTC staff Coordination meetings as needed with MTC Results Release November 2019 Ongoing collaboration with MTC Pre-scoping High- and Low- Performers Fall 2019 Collaboration as required Pre-scoping Process 16 Integration into Plan Bay Winter 2020 Collaboration as required Admin draft EIR/EIS Area 2050 Blueprint Public Draft EIR/EIS- Q2 2021 Final EIS/ROD Q4 2021 .
Recommended publications
  • Caltrain Business Plan

    Caltrain Business Plan

    Caltrain Business Plan PROJECT UPDATE – SPRING 2019 What Addresses the future potential of the railroad over the next 20-30 years. It will assess the benefits, impacts, and costs of different What is service visions, building the case for investment and a plan for the Caltrain implementation. Business Plan? Why Allows the community and stakeholders to engage in developing a more certain, achievable, financially feasible future for the railroad based on local, regional, and statewide needs. 2 What Will the Business Plan Cover? Technical Tracks Service Business Case Community Interface Organization • Number of trains • Value from • Benefits and impacts to • Organizational structure • Frequency of service investments (past, surrounding communities of Caltrain including • Number of people present, and future) • Corridor management governance and delivery riding the trains • Infrastructure and strategies and approaches • Infrastructure needs operating costs consensus building • Funding mechanisms to to support different • Potential sources of • Equity considerations support future service service levels revenue 3 Where Are We in the Process? Board Adoption Stanford Partnership and Board Adoption of Board Adoption of of Scope Technical Team Contracting 2040 Service Vision Final Business Plan Initial Scoping Technical Approach Part 1: Service Vision Development Part 2: Business Implementation and Stakeholder Refinement, Partnering, Plan Completion Outreach and Contracting We Are Here 4 Electrification is the Foundation for Growth with Plans for
  • Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland

    Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland

    B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St.
  • 2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan

    2017-2026 Samtrans Short Range Transit Plan

    SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Short-Range Transit Plan Fiscal Years 2017 – 2026 May 3, 2017 Acknowledgements San Mateo County Transit District Board of Directors 2017 Rose Guilbault, Chair Charles Stone, Vice Chair Jeff Gee Carole Groom Zoe Kersteen-Tucker Karyl Matsumoto Dave Pine Josh Powell Peter Ratto Senior Staff Michelle Bouchard, Chief Operating Officer, Rail Michael Burns, Interim Chief Officer, Caltrain Planning / CalMod April Chan, Chief Officer, Planning, Grants, and Transportation Authority Jim Hartnett, General Manager/CEO Kathleen Kelly, Interim Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer Martha Martinez, Executive Officer, District Secretary, Executive Administration Seamus Murphy, Chief Communications Officer David Olmeda, Chief Operating Officer, Bus Mark Simon, Chief of Staff Short Range Transit Plan Project Staff and Contributors Douglas Kim, Director, Planning Lindsey Kiner, Senior Planner, Planning David Pape, Planner, Planning Margo Ross, Director of Transportation, Bus Transportation Karambir Cheema, Deputy Director ITS, Bus Transportation Ana Rivas, South Base Superintendent, Bus Transportation Ladi Millard, Director of Budgets, Finance Ryan Hinchman, Manager Financial Planning & Analysis, Finance Donald G. Esse, Senior Operations Financial Analyst, Bus Operations Leslie Fong, Senior Administrative Analyst, Grants Tina Dubost, Manager, Accessible Transit Services Natalie Chi, Bus Maintenance Contract Administrator, Bus Transportation Joan Cassman, Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett) Shayna M. van Hoften, Legal Counsel (Hanson
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16

    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
  • SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020

    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE As of 12-11-2020

    SAMTRANS CORRESPONDENCE as of 12-11-2020 December 8, 2020 The Honorable Gavin Newsom Governor, State of California State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Governor Newsom: Bay Area transit systems continue to struggle in the face of dramatically reduced ridership and revenues due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This challenge was already the most significant crisis in the history of public transportation, and now it has persisted far longer than any of us would have predicted. Since the beginning, our workers have been on the front lines, doing their jobs as essential workers, responsible for providing other front line workers with a way to safely travel to and from essential jobs. Now that the availability of a vaccine is on the horizon, we are proud to echo the attached call from the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU). Specifically, we urge you to work to ensure that transit, paratransit, and school transportation workers are prioritized along with other essential workers to receive the vaccine following the critical need to vaccinate the State’s healthcare workers. Even with reduced ridership, an average of 8 million monthly riders continue to depend on Bay Area transit services. These riders are the healthcare workers, grocery clerks, caregivers, emergency services personnel and others doing the critical work that has kept California functioning during the pandemic. They cannot continue to do so without access to reliable public transportation, and are therefore dependent on the health of the transit workers that serve them every day. Our agencies have worked hard to ensure the public health of riders and transit workers during this crisis.
  • Caltrain TIRCP Application Jan

    Caltrain TIRCP Application Jan

    PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR 2018 TRANSIT AND INTERCITY RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDS PROJECT NARRATIVE A. Project Title Page Project Title: Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project (EEP) includes a series of incremental investments in the 51-mile Caltrain Corridor between the 4th and King Station (San Francisco) and the Tamien Station (San Jose). These investments are focused on expanding and fully converting Caltrain’s mainline diesel fleet to electric trains. This investment builds on and leverages the existing Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) and supports the goals of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), providing increased capacity and service flexibility, supporting state and interregional connectivity, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions through elimination of diesel service from the mainline Peninsula Corridor. In addition to providing immediate, direct benefits, the EEP also represents an incremental step within a larger program of development that will evolve the Peninsula Corridor in a way that supports the ridership, service levels, and connectivity goals contemplated in the draft 2018 State Rail Plan. The central component of Caltrain’s 2018 TIRCP application is the purchase of 96 additional Electric Multiple Units (EMU). This procurement will fully exercise all available options under Caltrain’s current contract with Stadler and will provide sufficient EMUs to fully electrify Caltrain’s mainline fleet, while also sustaining and expanding capacity to accommodate growing demand. In addition to requesting funds for the purchase of EMUs, Caltrain is also requesting a smaller amount funding for a series of associated projects that will equip the corridor to receive and operate a fully electrified fleet in a way that allows the railroad to reap the maximum benefit from its investments.
  • Samtrans Fast Facts

    Samtrans Fast Facts

    SamTrans Fast Facts Administration The San Mateo County Transit District is the administrative body for the principal public transit and transportation pro- grams in San Mateo County, SamTrans bus service including Redi-Wheels and RediCoast paratransit service, Caltrain commuter rail and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. Caltrain and the TA have contracted with the District to serve as their managing agency, under the direction of their independent board of directors. The Board of Directors consists of nine members from various leadership positions in the community with the following composition: two members from the county Board of Supervisors; one transportation expert appointed by the Board of Supervisors; three city councilpersons, appointed by the City Selection Committee; and three public members, one of whom must reside on the coastside, appointed by the above six members. SamTrans Strategic Plan In December 2014, SamTrans approved its five-year Strategic Plan, a blueprint that will guide the policy decisions of the bus agency from 2015 to 2019. The plan focuses on five main goals: increasing bus ridership by 15 percent, growing passenger fare revenue by 20 percent, reducing annual debt service by $1.5 million, improving organizational perfor- mance and managing workforce change. SamTrans has already successfully pursued several of those goals. Due in large part to the changes implemented as a result of the SamTrans Service Plan—the most extensive reworking of bus operations along the Peninsula in a genera- tion—bus ridership is stabilizing, reversing years of stagnant growth. The bus agency also approved changes to its fare policy, aimed at restoring the agency’s fiscal health and achieving the goal of 20 percent fare revenue growth.
  • SBC Executivesummfac

    SBC Executivesummfac

    CAPITOL CORRIDOR SOUTH BAY CONNECT AUGUST 2020 Purpose Study Area and Project Elements South Bay Connect proposes to relocate the Capitol Corridor passenger rail service between the Oakland N Coliseum and Newark from the Union Pacific Railroad (UP) Niles Subdivision to the Coast Subdivision for a faster, more direct route. It will also create new transbay connections for passengers between the East Bay and Peninsula by connecting to bus and shuttle services at the Ardenwood Station. The project is not proposing an increase in Capitol Corridor service frequency or changes to UP’s freight service, but does not preclude service growth in the future. The relocation will facilitate the separation of passenger and freight rail, resulting in improved rail operations, efficiency, and reliability while minimizing rail congestion within the corridor. Proposed New Station and Railroad Potential Station Area Proposed Capitol Corridor (CC) Service Potential Station Considered and Eliminated Existing CC Service Existing Station CC Service to be Discontinued Station where CC Service Study Area to be Discontinued UP Improvement Area BART Station Benefits Reduce passenger rail travel time between Oakland and San Jose and throughout the larger megaregion to increase ridership on transit, ease congestion on the Bay Area’s stressed roadways, and decrease auto commutes. Diversify and enhance network integration by reducing duplicative capital investments and dif- ferentiating Capitol Corridor’s intercity rail service from commuter rail and other transit services, including BART’s extension to San Jose. Support economic vitality by permitting enhanced rail movement and the preservation of freight rail capacity in the Northern California market through the reduction of existing conflicts between freight rail operations and passenger rail service.
  • Transit Information South San Francisco Station

    Transit Information South San Francisco Station

    BASE Schedules & Fares Horario y precios del tránsito 時刻表與車費 Transit Holy Cross N Cemetery Treasure Island Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E RVservice, Park please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Stops ISABELLE CIR South San San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective January 1, 2020 LAWNDALE BLVD Transit (BART) rail service connects Colma Creek Francisco the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices are for riders using M I S S I O N R D Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. Clipper®. There is a a 50¢ sur- Map Key Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and A quick reference guide to service hours from this charge per trip for using magnetic Station other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. stripe tickets. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from South San Francisco Station From South San Francisco to: (stations listed in alphabetical order) El Camino 5-Minute Walk 1000ft/305m Weekday Saturday Sunday Costco Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip First Last First Last First Last High School Radius Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 4.70 9.40 South San Antioch 5:18a 12:01a 6:14a 12:01a 8:24a 12:03aWinston16th St. Mission 4.05 8.10 Children 4 and under ride free.
  • Chapter 3: Environmental Setting and Consequences

    Chapter 3: Environmental Setting and Consequences

    CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND CONSEQUENCES This chapter presents information on the environmental setting in the project area as well as the environmental consequences of the No-Electrification and Electrification Program Alternatives. Environmental issue categories are organized in alphabetical order, consistent with the CEQA checklist presented in Appendix A. The project study area encompasses the geographic area potentially most affected by the project. For most issues involving physical effects this is the project “footprint,” or the area that would be disturbed for or replaced by the new project facilities. This area focuses on the Caltrain corridor from the San Francisco Fourth and King Station in the City and County of San Francisco to the Gilroy Station in downtown Gilroy in Santa Clara County and also includes the various locations proposed for traction power facilities and power connections. Air quality effects may be felt over a wider area. 3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 VISUAL OR AESTHETIC SETTING The visual or aesthetic environment in the Caltrain corridor is described to establish the baseline against which to compare changes resulting from construction of project facilities and the demolition or alteration of existing structures. This discussion focuses on representative locations along the railroad corridor, including existing stations (both modern and historic), tunnel portals, railroad overpasses, locations of the proposed traction power facilities and other areas where the Electrification Program would physically change above-ground features, affecting the visual appearance of the area and views enjoyed by area residents and users. For purposes of this analysis, sensitive visual receptors are defined as corridor residents and business occupants, recreational users of parks and preserved natural areas, and students of schools in the vicinity of the proposed project.
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation

    Santa Clara Valley Transportation

    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report ................................................................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), a fund of VTA, for the year ended June 30, 2019. The
  • Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield

    Solanoexpress Bus Routes Transit Information Fairfield Transportation Center Fairfield

    Regional Transit Map Transit REGIONAL TRANSIT DIAGRAM To To Eureka Clearlake Information Mendocino Transit DOWNTOWN AREA TRANSIT CONNECTIONS Authority To Ukiah Lake Oakland Mendocino Transit 12th Street Oakland City Center BART: Greyhound BART, AC Transit FA FA 19th Street Oakland BART: FA BART, AC Transit Cloverdale San Francisco Yolobus To Davis Civic Center/UN Plaza BART: Winters Fairfi eld and Suisun Transit SolanoExpress is Solano SolanoExpress is Solano BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Fairfield 101 Embarcadero BART & Ferry Terminal: County’s intercity transit connection. County’s intercity transit connection. BART, Golden Gate Transit, Muni, SamTrans, (FAST) is the local transit system Baylink, Alameda/Oakland Ferry, Alameda Harbor Faireld and Healdsburg Bay Ferry, Blue & Gold Fleet, Amtrak CA Thruway Suisun Transit SolanoExpress routes connect cities SolanoExpress routes connect cities Transit To Sacramento for Fairfi eld and Suisun City and also Mongomery Street BART: Healdsburg BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans Dixon within the county and provide service within the county and provide service Calistoga Readi- operates many of the SolanoExpress (Operated by FAST) (Operated by SolTrans) Handi Powell Street BART: Transportation Ride Van Calistoga BART, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans regional routes. Please visit www.fasttransit. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. to neighboring counties, BART, and the ferry. San Francisco Caltrain at 4th & King: Dixon Windsor Deer Caltrain, Muni, Amtrak CA Thruway org or call 707-422-BUSS (707-422-2877) for For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or For more information, call (800) 535-6883 or Park Transbay Temporary Terminal: Guerneville AC Transit, Muni, Golden Gate Transit, SamTrans, 80 visit www.solanoexpress.com.