Trace-Element Geochemistry of Sulfides in Upper Mantle Lherzolite

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trace-Element Geochemistry of Sulfides in Upper Mantle Lherzolite minerals Article Trace-Element Geochemistry of Sulfides in Upper Mantle Lherzolite Xenoliths from East Antarctica Alexandre V. Andronikov * , Irina E. Andronikova and Tamara Sidorinova Department of Geochemistry and Laboratories, Czech Geological Survey, Geologicka 6, 15200 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (I.E.A.); [email protected] (T.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sulfides in upper mantle lherzolite xenoliths from Cretaceous alkaline-ultramafic rocks in the Jetty Peninsula (East Antarctica) were studied for their major and trace-element compositions using SEM and LA-ICP-MS applied in situ. Modal abundance of sulfides is the lowest in Cpx-poor lherzolites ≤ Spl-Grt lherzolites << Cpx-rich lherzolites. Most sulfides are either interstitial (i-type) or inclusions in rock-forming minerals (e-type) with minor sulfide phases mostly present in metasomatic veinlets and carbonate-silicate interstitial patches (m-type). The main sulfide assemblage is pent- landite + chalcopyrite ± pyrrhotite; minor sulfides are polydymite, millerite, violarite, siegenite, and monosulfide solution (mss). Sulfide assemblages in the xenolith matrix are a product of the subsolidus re-equilibration of primary mss at temperatures below ≤300 ◦C. Platinum group elements (PGE) Citation: Andronikov, A.V.; abundances suggest that most e-type sulfides are the residues of melting processes and that the i-type Andronikova, I.E.; Sidorinova, T. sulfides are crystallization products of sulfide-bearing fluids/liquids. The m-type sulfides might have Trace-Element Geochemistry of resulted from low-temperature metasomatism by percolating sulfide-carbonate-silicate fluids/melts. Sulfides in Upper Mantle Lherzolite Xenoliths from East Antarctica. The PGE in sulfide record processes are related to partial melting in mantle and intramantle melt Minerals 2021, 11, 773. https:// migration. Most other trace elements initially partitioned into interstitial sulfide liquid and later doi.org/10.3390/min11070773 metasomatically re-enriched residual sulfides overprinting their primary signatures. The extent of element partitioning into sulfide liquids depends on P, T, f O2, and host peridotite composition. Academic Editors: Nigel J. Cook, Paul Sylvester, Hanumantha Keywords: sulfides; trace elements; upper mantle xenoliths; East Antarctica; SEM; LA-ICP-MS Rao Kota, Theodore J. Bornhorst, Anna H. Kaksonen, Huifang Xu, Alexander R Cruden and Sytle M. Antao 1. Introduction Small stock-like Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous intrusions of alkaline-ultramafic Received: 20 May 2021 rocks (mostly alkaline picrite and ultramafic lamprophyre) in the Jetty Peninsula (Prince Accepted: 13 July 2021 Published: 16 July 2021 Charles Mountains, East Antarctica; Figure1) contain abundant xenoliths representing samples of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) beneath the region [1–6]. The Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral studied area is located on the flank of the small rift system which formed at about 650 Ma with regard to jurisdictional claims in and lies on the western side of the larger Lambert–Amery rift system, which was active from published maps and institutional affil- the Mesozoic period to the Cenozoic period. A detailed description of the geology of the iations. Prince Charles Mountains is given in [4–7]. The upper mantle xenoliths are mostly lherzolite with subordinate harzburgite, dunite and wherlite. Three main groups of lherzolites were identified on the basis of mineral assemblage, textural relationships between the minerals, and mineral composition: (i) clinopyroxene (Cpx)-poor spinel (Spl) lherzolites, (ii) Cpx- rich Spl herzolites, and (iii) Spl-garnet (Grt) lherzolites [3–5]. The East Antarctic SCLM Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. rocks have experienced multiple episodes of infiltration by silicate, carbonate, and minor This article is an open access article sulfide melts; this has resulted in partial melting, recrystallization, and the generation distributed under the terms and of metasomatic minerals such as carbonates and sulfides [5,7–11]. The deepest-sampled ◦ conditions of the Creative Commons upper mantle rocks (Spl-Grt lherzolite) yield ambient temperatures of 1040–1180 C with Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// pressures up to 24 kbar that correspond to P-T conditions at depths of 75–80 km [2,4,12]. creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ Sulfide minerals are a common accessory phase (<0.1%) in mantle rocks and are 4.0/). typically represented by pentlandite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite [13–16]. Despite their Minerals 2021, 11, 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11070773 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Minerals 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 32 1040–1180 °C with pressures up to 24 kbar that correspond to P-T conditions at depths of 75–80 km [2,4,12]. Minerals 2021, 11, 773 Sulfide minerals are a common accessory phase (<0.1%) in mantle rocks2 ofand 32 are typ- ically represented by pentlandite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite [13–16]. Despite their in- significant abundances, sulfides are important minerals because they likely control the insignificantplatinum group abundances, element sulfides (PGE), are siderophile, important minerals and chalcophile because they element likely control budget the of mantle platinumrocks and group determine element their (PGE), behavior siderophile, during and melting chalcophile [16–18]. element Although budget sulfides of mantle in mantle rocks and determine their behavior during melting [16–18]. Although sulfides in mantle peridotite xenoliths from different localities have been recently studied to trace their crys- peridotite xenoliths from different localities have been recently studied to trace their crystallizationtallization and and subsolidus subsolidus historieshistories ([ 13([13,17–27],17–27] and and others), others), studies studies of the traceof the element trace element compositioncomposition of of sulfides sulfides in mantle in mantle xenoliths xenoliths are scarce are scarce and are and mostly are limitedmostly tolimited the PGE. to the PGE. FigureFigure 1. 1.Schematic Schematic map map of Antarctica of Antarctica showing showing the position the posi oftion thePrince of the Charles Prince MountainsCharles Mountains and and JettyJetty Peninsula Peninsula (asterix). (asterix). SulfideSulfide minerals minerals in peridotitein peridotite xenoliths xenoliths from from East Antarctica East Antarctica were heretofore were heretofore almost almost completelycompletely unstudied. unstudied. Only Only several several sulfide sulfide grains grains in Spl-Grt in Spl-Grt lherzolite lherzolite xenoliths xenoliths had been had been examined via electron microprobe and Raman spectroscopy by Solovova et al. [11]. In examined via electron microprobe and Raman spectroscopy by Solovova et al. [11]. In order to retrieve information on the origin and evolution of sulfides in mantle xenoliths, weorder conducted to retrieve detailed information in situ scanning on the origin electron and microscopy evolution (SEM) of sulfides and laser in mantle ablation xenoliths, inductivelywe conducted coupled detailed plasma in mass situ spectrometric scanning electron (LA-ICP-MS) microscopy analyses (SEM) of the sulfideand laser phases ablation in- inductively SCLM peridotite coupled xenoliths plasma samplesmass spectrometric from the Jetty (LA-ICP-MS) Peninsula area. analyses The present of the work sulfide is phases basedin SCLM on lherzolite peridotite xenoliths xenoliths that havesamples been from previously the Jetty studied Peninsula in detail area. for bulk The rock present and work is rock-formingbased on lherzolite mineral geochemistryxenoliths that [2 have–4,12 ].been previously studied in detail for bulk rock and rock-forming mineral geochemistry [2–4,12]. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Brief Characteristics of Lherzolite Xenoliths 2. Materials and Methods Upper mantle xenoliths in the Jetty Peninsula area are hosted by alkaline ultramafic magmatic2.1. Brief Characteristic rocks (150 ± 5s Ma)of Lherzolite that originated Xenoliths from the melting of the mantle at depths of 120–150Upper km mantle [1,28,29 xenoliths]. The xenoliths in the Jetty were Peninsula trapped by area ascending are hosted magma by alkaline at depths ultramafic frommagmatic75–80 kmrocksup (150 to the ± 5 crustal–mantle Ma) that originated boundary from and the were melting rapidly of deliveredthe mantle to at the depths of surface120–150 [4 ].km The [1,28,29]. studied lherzolite The xenoliths xenolith were samples trapped were by collected ascending by the magma authors at from depths a from single75–80 magmatic km up to body the composedcrustal–mantle of alkaline boundary picrite. and were rapidly delivered to the surface The Cpx-poor Spl lherzolites are medium to coarse-grained inequigranular rocks [4]. The studied lherzolite xenolith samples were collected by the authors from a single composed of 78–82% olivine (Ol), 10–14% orthopyroxene (Opx), 4–7% Cpx, and 1.5–5% Spl. magmatic body composed of alkaline picrite. Low concentrations of CaO and Al2O3 (0.8–1.5 wt% and 0.5–1.6 wt%, respectively) and a high Mg#The (100Mg/(MgCpx-poor Spl + Fe)) lherzolites of 90.2 to are 91.2 medium suggesting to depletion coarse-grained by partial inequigranular melting, are rocks characteristiccomposed of of 78–82% the rock olivine [3,4]. The (Ol), history 10–14% of both orthopyroxene significant depletion (Opx), and4–7% later Cpx, slight and 1.5–5% Spl. Low concentrations of CaO and Al2O3 (0.8–1.5 wt% and 0.5–1.6
Recommended publications
  • The First Record of Siegenite (Ni,Co)3S4 from the Netherlands
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw 82 (2): 215-218 (2003) The first record of siegenite (Ni,Co)3S4 from the Netherlands H. Bongaerts Rector van de Boornlaan 13, 6061 AN Posterholt, the Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: August 2001; accepted: October 2002 G Abstract Epigenetic mineralisations occurring in the former coal-mining district of Limburg predominantly consist of sphalerite, gale­ na, chalcopyrite, quartz, Fe-dolomite/ankerite and calcite. The present note describes siegenite which was collected for the first time from this paragenesis some years ago. Keywords: hydrothermal mineralizations, Limburg, siegenite, Carboniferous Introduction tions was discussed by Krahn et al. (1986), to which reference is made. When collieries in southern Limburg (the Nether­ The mineralisations occurring in the Limburg lands) were still in operation, epigenetic mineralisa­ Westphalian predominantly consist of sphalerite, tions were encountered in sediments of Westphalian galena, chalcopyrite, quartz, Fe-dolomite/ankerite (Late Carboniferous) age, and records of such date and calcite. Less common are pyrite and marcasite back to the earliest days of mining (Leggewie & Jong- while barites is extremely rare. These mineralisations mans, 1931). The first detailed descriptions may be occurred almost exclusively in sandstones and found in Douw & Oorthuis (1945) and in De Wijker- quartzitic sandstones (NITG-TNO, 1999). In addi­ slooth(1949). tion, dickite is common, mainly in pseudobreccias of From the
    [Show full text]
  • The Gersdorffite-Bismuthinite-Native Gold Association and the Skarn
    minerals Article The Gersdorffite-Bismuthinite-Native Gold Association and the Skarn-Porphyry Mineralization in the Kamariza Mining District, Lavrion, Greece † Panagiotis Voudouris 1,* , Constantinos Mavrogonatos 1 , Branko Rieck 2, Uwe Kolitsch 2,3, Paul G. Spry 4 , Christophe Scheffer 5, Alexandre Tarantola 6 , Olivier Vanderhaeghe 7, Emmanouil Galanos 1, Vasilios Melfos 8 , Stefanos Zaimis 9, Konstantinos Soukis 1 and Adonis Photiades 10 1 Department of Geology & Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (K.S.) 2 Institut für Mineralogie und Kristallographie, Universität Wien, 1090 Wien, Austria; [email protected] 3 Mineralogisch-Petrographische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, 1010 Wien, Austria; [email protected] 4 Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA; [email protected] 5 Département de Géologie et de Génie Géologique, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; [email protected] 6 Université de Lorraine, CNRS, GeoRessources UMR 7359, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, F-54506 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; [email protected] 7 Université de Toulouse, Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), UMR 5563 CNRS, F-31400 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 8 Department of Mineralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology, Faculty of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 9 Institut für Mineralogie, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09599 Freiberg, Germany; [email protected] 10 Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration (I.G.M.E.), 13677 Acharnae, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-210-7274129 † The paper is an extended version of our paper published in 1st International Electronic Conference on Mineral Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt Mineral Ecology
    American Mineralogist, Volume 102, pages 108–116, 2017 Cobalt mineral ecology ROBERT M. HAZEN1,*, GRETHE HYSTAD2, JOSHUA J. GOLDEN3, DANIEL R. HUMMER1, CHAO LIU1, ROBERT T. DOWNS3, SHAUNNA M. MORRISON3, JOLYON RALPH4, AND EDWARD S. GREW5 1Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, D.C. 20015, U.S.A. 2Department of Mathematics, Computer Science, and Statistics, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, Indiana 46323, U.S.A. 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 East 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0077, U.S.A. 4Mindat.org, 128 Mullards Close, Mitcham, Surrey CR4 4FD, U.K. 5School of Earth and Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Minerals containing cobalt as an essential element display systematic trends in their diversity and distribution. We employ data for 66 approved Co mineral species (as tabulated by the official mineral list of the International Mineralogical Association, http://rruff.info/ima, as of 1 March 2016), represent- ing 3554 mineral species-locality pairs (www.mindat.org and other sources, as of 1 March 2016). We find that cobalt-containing mineral species, for which 20% are known at only one locality and more than half are known from five or fewer localities, conform to a Large Number of Rare Events (LNRE) distribution. Our model predicts that at least 81 Co minerals exist in Earth’s crust today, indicating that at least 15 species have yet to be discovered—a minimum estimate because it assumes that new minerals will be found only using the same methods as in the past. Numerous additional cobalt miner- als likely await discovery using micro-analytical methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Is Available On- Bearing Mineralising Event Is Not Possible Because of the Line At
    Eur. J. Mineral., 33, 175–187, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/ejm-33-175-2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Grimmite, NiCo2S4, a new thiospinel from Príbram,ˇ Czech Republic Pavel Škácha1,2, Jiríˇ Sejkora1, Jakub Plášil3, Zdenekˇ Dolnícekˇ 1, and Jana Ulmanová1 1Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, National Museum, Cirkusová 1740, 193 00 Prague 9 – Horní Pocernice,ˇ Czech Republic 2Mining Museum Príbram,ˇ Hynka Klickyˇ place 293, 261 01 Príbramˇ VI, Czech Republic 3Institute of Physics ASCR, v.v.i., Na Slovance 1999/2, 182 21 Prague 8, Czech Republic Correspondence: Pavel Škácha ([email protected]) Received: 25 December 2020 – Revised: 2 March 2021 – Accepted: 8 March 2021 – Published: 19 April 2021 Abstract. The new mineral grimmite, NiCo2S4, was found in siderite–sphalerite gangue at the dump of shaft no. 9, one of the mines in the abandoned Príbramˇ uranium and base-metal district, central Bohemia, Czech Republic. The new mineral occurs as rare idiomorphic to hypidiomorphic grains up to 200 µm × 70 µm in size or veinlet aggregates. In reflected light, grimmite is creamy grey with a pinkish tint. Pleochroism, polarising colours and internal reflections were not observed. Reflectance values of grimmite in the air (R %) are 42.5 at 470 nm, 45.9 at 546 nm, 47.7 at 589 nm and 50.2 at 650 nm). The empirical formula for grimmite, based on electron-microprobe analyses (n D 13), is Ni1:01(Co1:99Fe0:06Pb0:01Bi0:01/62:07S3:92. The ideal formula is NiCo2S4; requires Ni 19.26, Co 38.67, and S 42.07; and totals 100.00 wt %.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution, Geochemistry, and Storage of Mining Sediment In
    STATEMENT OF WORK Spatial distribution, geochemistry, and storage of mining sediment in channel and floodplain deposits of streams draining the Viburnum Trend Mining District of Southeast Missouri, USA Prepared by: Dr. Robert T. Pavlowsky, Ph.D., Principle Investigator Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute Missouri State University 901 South National Avenue Springfield, MO 65897 [email protected] Co‐Principle Investigators Dr. Scott Lecce, Ph.D., East Carolina University Marc R. Owen, M.S., Ozarks Environmental and Water Resources Institute Submitted to: John Weber U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 101 Park DeVille, Suite A Columbia, MO 65203 573‐234‐2132 x 177 [email protected] July 16, 2012 1 INTRODUCTION The New Lead Belt in southeastern Missouri has been a major producer of lead (Pb) and other metals since 1960 when the first mine opened in Viburnum, Missouri (Seeger, 2008). To date, 10 mines have operated along a north‐south line extending for almost 100 kilometers (km) from from Viburnum to south of Bunker, Missouri. This subdistrict of the Southeast Missouri Lead Mining District is referred to as the Viburnum Trend (VT). Seven mines are presently in operation in the VT: (i) Viburnum #29 Mine in Washington County which uses the Buick Mill; (ii) Casteel or Viburnum #35 Mine in Iron County which uses the Buick and Brushy Creek Mills; (iii) Buick Mine and Mill in Iron and Reynolds Counties; (iv) Fletcher Mine and Mill in Reynolds County which sometimes uses the Brushy Creek Mill; (v) Brushy Creek mine and mill in Reynolds County; (vi) West Fork Mine and Mill in Reynolds County; and (vii) Sweetwater Mine and Mill in Reynolds County (Seeger, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article Synthesis Of
    AAAS Research Volume 2019, Article ID 8078549, 11 pages https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/8078549 Research Article Synthesis of PdSx- Mediated Polydymite Heteronanorods and Their Long-Range Activation for Enhanced Water Electroreduction Qiang Gao1, Rui Wu1, Yang Liu1, Ya-Rong Zheng1, Yi Li1, Li-Mei Shang1, Yi-Ming Ju1,ChaoGu1, Xu-Sheng Zheng2, Jian-Wei Liu1, Jun-Fa Zhu2, Min-Rui Gao1, and Shu-Hong Yu1,3 1 Division of Nanomaterials & Chemistry, Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Hefei Science Center of CAS, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 2National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China 3Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian 116023, China Correspondence should be addressed to Min-Rui Gao; [email protected] and Shu-Hong Yu; [email protected] Received 24 February 2019; Accepted 13 May 2019; Published 18 August 2019 Copyright © 2019 Qiang Gao et al. Exclusive Licensee Science and Technology Review Publishing House. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Material interfaces permit electron transfer that modulates the electronic structure and surface properties of catalysts, leading to radically enhanced rates for many important reactions. Unlike conventional thoughts, the nanoscale interfacial interactions have been recently envisioned to be able to afect the reactivity of catalysts far from the interface. However, demonstration of such unlocalized alterations in existing interfacial materials is rare, impeding the development of new catalysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Millerite and Other Nickel Sulfides from the Siderite Deposit „Steirischer Erzberg“, Styria, Austria
    MITT. ÖSTERR. MINER. GES. 164 (2018) MILLERITE AND OTHER NICKEL SULFIDES FROM THE SIDERITE DEPOSIT „STEIRISCHER ERZBERG“, STYRIA, AUSTRIA Eugen Libowitzky*1, Anton Beran1 & Richard Göd2 1Institut für Mineralogie und Kristallographie 2 Department of Lithospheric Research Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Wien / *[email protected] Abstract Millerite, NiS, has been identified for the first time in cinnabar- and pyrite-bearing siderite ore samples from „Steirischer Erzberg“, Styria, Austria. In addition, the occurrence of other nickel sulfides has been confirmed, such as siegenite-violarite solid-solutions (ss), CoNi2S4- FeNi2S4, and Gersdorffite, Ni[AsS]. Whereas milleri- te and gersdorffite are close to ideal chemistry with only minor Co and Fe contents, siegenite-violarite ss show a wide range of compositions. Almost pure siegenite with Fe below detection limit occurs in separated crystals within cinnabar or mil- lerite. In contrast, small grains (sometimes in equilibrium with millerite) within a pyrite host contain up to ~14.1 wt% Fe and thus plot in the compositional field of violarite. Zusammenfassung Millerit, NiS, wurde zum ersten mal in Zinnober- und Pyrit-führenden Sideriterz- proben vom Steirischen Erzberg, Steiermark, Österreich, nachgewiesen. Zusätzlich wurde auch das Vorkommen weitere Nickelsulfide wie Siegenit-Violarit-Mischkri- stalle (ss), CoNi2S4-FeNi2S4, und Gersdorffit, Ni[AsS], bestätigt. Während Millerit und Gersdorffit nahe der Idealchemie mit nur geringen Co- und Fe-Gehalten sind, zeigen Siegenit-Violarit ss einen weiten Zusammensetzungsbereich. Nahezu reiner Siegenit mit Fe unter der Nachweisgrenze kommt in separaten Kristallen innerhalb von Zinnober und Millerit vor. Im Gegensatz dazu enthalten kleine Einschlüsse (manchmal im Gleichgewicht mit Millerit) im Pyrit bis zu ~14.1 Gew.-% Fe und fallen damit in das Zusammensetzungsfeld von Violarit.
    [Show full text]
  • Platy Galena from the Viburnum Trend, Southeast Missouri: Character, Mine Distribution, Paragenetic Position, Trace Element Cont
    minerals Article Platy Galena from the Viburnum Trend, Southeast Missouri: Character, Mine Distribution, Paragenetic Position, Trace Element Content, Nature of Twinning, and Conditions of Formation Richard D. Hagni Department of Geological Sciences and Geological and Petroleum Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401, USA; [email protected] Received: 15 December 2017; Accepted: 23 February 2018; Published: 2 March 2018 Abstract: The Viburnum Trend of southeast Missouri is one of the world’s largest producers of lead. The lead occurs as galena, predominantly in two crystallographic forms, octahedrons and cubes. Many studies have shown that octahedral galena is paragentically early, the more abundant of the two crystal forms, and is commonly modified in the cube. Those studies also have shown that the cubic form is paragenetically later, less abundant than the octahedrons, and may exhibit minor octahedral modifications. Viburnum Trend galena crystals that exhibit a platy form have received almost no study. The reason for their lack of study is the rarity of their occurrence. This communication discusses their character, mine distribution, paragenetic position, trace element contents, nature of twinning, and speculated conditions of formation. It also compares their character to similar platy galena occurrences in Germany, Bulgaria, Russia, Mexico, and notes their occurrence at the Pine Point District in the Northwest Territories of Canada and at the Black Cloud mine in Colorado. Flat, platy galena crystals have been recognized to occur in very small amounts in the Magmont, Buick, Fletcher, Brushy Creek, and Sweetwater mines in the Viburnum Trend. In contrast, platy galena has never been observed to occur at the Casteel, West Fork, #27, #28, and #29 mines in the Trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Walden P. Pratt, Editor Prepared in Cooperation with the Missouri
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY METALLIC MINERAL-RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE ROLLA I°x2° QUADRANGLE, MISSOURI, AS APPRAISED IN SEPTEMBER 1980 Walden P. Pratt, Editor Prepared in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey Open-File Report 81-518 1981 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey standards. Tables Page Table 1. Resource potential for Mississippi Valley-type base-metal deposits in Bonneterre Formation and Lamotte Sandstone, September 1980.............................................. 15 2. Estimates of ore "deposits'* in selected areas in the Rolla 1°x2° quadrangle, Missouri.................................. 16 3. Estimated amounts and values of metals in potential ore "deposits" in selected areas of the Rolla I°x2° quadrangle, Missouri.................................................... 19 4. Resource potential for Mississippi Valley-type base-metal and barite deposits in Cambrian and Ordovician formations overlying the Bonneterre Formation, September 1980.......... 22 5. Resource potential for Kiruna-type iron apatite(-copper) deposits, September 1980.................................... 29 6. Spectrographic analyses of hematite and magnetite from the Pilot Knob, Iron Mountain, and Pea Ridge iron deposits...... 31 7. Spectrographic analyses of rocks and minerals from Pilot Knob Mine, Iron County, Missouri............................ 32 8. Spectrographic analyses of ore and gangue minerals from Iron Mountain Mine, Iron County, Missouri................... 33 9* Spectrographic analyses of rocks and minerals from Pea Ridge Iron Mine, Washington County, Missouri............ 34 10. Whole-rock chemical analyses of samples from Avon, Dent Branch, and Bee Fork, Rolla I*x2a quadrangle, Missouri...... 33 11. Spectrographic and chemical analyses of rocks from Dent Branch and Avon diatremes, Rolla I*x2* quadrangle, Missouri...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Specific Gravity Index for Minerats
    A SPECIFICGRAVITY INDEX FOR MINERATS c. A. MURSKyI ern R. M. THOMPSON, Un'fuersityof Bri.ti,sh Col,umb,in,Voncouver, Canad,a This work was undertaken in order to provide a practical, and as far as possible,a complete list of specific gravities of minerals. An accurate speciflc cravity determination can usually be made quickly and this information when combined with other physical properties commonly leads to rapid mineral identification. Early complete but now outdated specific gravity lists are those of Miers given in his mineralogy textbook (1902),and Spencer(M,i,n. Mag.,2!, pp. 382-865,I}ZZ). A more recent list by Hurlbut (Dana's Manuatr of M,i,neral,ogy,LgE2) is incomplete and others are limited to rock forming minerals,Trdger (Tabel,l,enntr-optischen Best'i,mmungd,er geste,i,nsb.ildend,en M,ineral,e, 1952) and Morey (Encycto- ped,iaof Cherni,cal,Technol,ogy, Vol. 12, 19b4). In his mineral identification tables, smith (rd,entifi,cati,onand. qual,itatioe cherai,cal,anal,ys'i,s of mineral,s,second edition, New york, 19bB) groups minerals on the basis of specificgravity but in each of the twelve groups the minerals are listed in order of decreasinghardness. The present work should not be regarded as an index of all known minerals as the specificgravities of many minerals are unknown or known only approximately and are omitted from the current list. The list, in order of increasing specific gravity, includes all minerals without regard to other physical properties or to chemical composition. The designation I or II after the name indicates that the mineral falls in the classesof minerals describedin Dana Systemof M'ineralogyEdition 7, volume I (Native elements, sulphides, oxides, etc.) or II (Halides, carbonates, etc.) (L944 and 1951).
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Investigations Concerning Lead Mining Issues in Southeastern Missouri Edited by Michael J
    History of Mining in the Southeast Missouri Lead District and Description of Mine Processes, Regulatory Controls, Environmental Effects, and Mine Facilities in the Viburnum Trend Subdistrict By Cheryl M. Seeger1 Chapter 1 of Hydrologic Investigations Concerning Lead Mining Issues in Southeastern Missouri Edited by Michael J. Kleeschulte 1Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Land Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5140 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................5 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................5 Purpose and Scope ..............................................................................................................................7 Previous and Current Studies .............................................................................................................7 Missouri Lead Study ....................................................................................................................7 U.S. Geological Survey Studies .................................................................................................7 Other Viburnum Trend Studies ...................................................................................................9 Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation Study of Pentlandite/Pyrrhotite to Violarite
    252 Regolith 2005 – Ten Years of CRC LEME THE TRANSFORMATION OF PENTLANDITE TO VIOLARITE UNDER MILD HYDROTHERMAL CONDITIONS: A DISSOLUTION- REPRECIPITATION REACTION Allan Pring1,2, Christophe Tenailleau,1 Barbara Etschmann1, Joel Brugger1,3 & Ben Grguric4 1Department of Mineralogy, South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000 2School of Earth & Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005 2CRC LEME, School of Earth & Environmental Science, University of Adelaide, SA, 5005 4Minerals Exploration, BHP Billiton Ltd., PO Box 91, Belmont, WA, 6984 INTRODUCTION Violarite, FeNi2S4, occurs abundantly in the supergene alteration zones of many massive and disseminated Ni sulfide deposits, where it replaces primary nickel sulfide minerals such as pentlandite (Nickel 1973, Misra & Fleet 1974). The nickel deposits of Western Australia’s Yilgarn Craton have deep weathering profiles and supergene violarite constitutes a considerable proportion of the ore in some of these deposits. Thus, violarite is probably the most economically important member of the thiospinel mineral group. Violarite can also form as a primary phase by exsolution during the cooling of pentlandite ((Fe,Ni)9S8) (Grguric 2002). Understanding the thermodynamics and kinetics of the formation of violarite in the weathering profile is important for understanding alteration patterns in and around nickel deposits and has significant implications for ore processing. Supergene violarite is generally very fine-grained and relatively porous and it has a poor response in the floatation systems used to treat many massive sulfide ores. On the other hand, a proportion of violarite in the nickel concentrate facilitates smelting, as the burning of violarite is a highly exothermic reaction (Dunn & Howes 1996).
    [Show full text]