DOCSLIB.ORG

2S___21 CD10.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2S___21 CD10.Pdf ACTION SHEET ITEM FROM THE PUBLIC WORKSICIP AND LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING OF MONDAY, JULY 28,2014 ITEM 15 REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND READOPTING ARTICLE IX OF THE UNIFORM TRAFFIC ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THAT PARKING VIOLATIONS RELATED TO PARKING METERS, CITY PARKING LOTS AND CITY PARKING GARAGES ARE NUISANCES AND SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION; AND MAKING SUCH OTHER CHANGES AS ARE NECESSARY TO MEET THE PURPOSES OF THIS ORDINANCE (COUNCILOR DIMAS) (SEVASTIAN GURULE) PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE ACTION: Approved FUNDING SOURCE: SPECIAL CONDITIONS I AMENDMENTS I STAFF FOLLOW UP: VOTE FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN CHAIRPERSON TRUJILLO X COUNCILOR BUSHEE X COUNCILOR DIMAS X COUNCILOR DOMINGUEZ X COUNCILOR RIVERA X 1 Date: July 21,2014 To: Public Works Committee Via: bepartment Director ~ From: Re: An Ordinance Repealing and Readopting Article IX of The Uniform Traffic Ordinance Item and Issue: This bill repeals and readopts Article IX of the Uniform Traffic Ordinance to establish that parking violations related to parking meters, city parking lots and city parking garages are nuisances and subject to administrative adjudication which would also include the use of a collection agency. Background: The total number of citations issued in calendar year 2013 was thirty thousand and five (30,005) with a base fine value of eight hundred fifty thousand, five hundred and twelve ($850,512); the total outstanding amount is three hundred twenty four thousand forty four ($324,044). Those violations that would be considered nuisances make up approximately 69% of total violations issued. They are: *Parking at an Expired Meter (53%) *Exceeding the Time Limit (I%) *Fee Notices (9%) *Penalty Assessments (6%) The total number of citations that would be considered a nuisance under the proposed code amendment is twenty thousand nine hundred thirty eight (20,938), with a base fine value oftwo hundred eight five thousand, nine hundred eighty eight ($285,988); the total outstanding amount is one hundred thirty six thousand, six hundred sixty nine ($ 136,669) or 5,307. New Mexico plates were issued sixteen thousand seven hundred and eight ( 16, 708) and four thousand two hundred thirty were issued to out-of-state plates. Currently, all parking violations are considered petty misdemeanors which require collection and adjudication through Municipal Court. The parking division follows the following collection process for parking violations: I. After 15 days of non-payment, the Parking Division sends a penalty assessment notice to the vehicle' s registered owner (the violator) notifying them that the fee has doubled. (The issuance of this notice is dependent upon the parking division having the curTent registered owner's name and address for the vehicle that received the citation.) 2. After 30 days of non-payment (and 15 days after the penalty assessment is issued), the parking division sends a summons to appear in Municipal Court on a specific date and time to answer for the outstanding fine. 2 3. The Municipal Court sends a criminal summons to those violators who did not appear as summonsed by the parking division. 4. If the violator does not appear as criminally summonsed, the Municipal Court follows up with a Failure to Appear Notice and, potentially, a bench warrant. Under the proposed code amendment, the parking division will have the opportunity to become more proactive in its collection efforts and responsive to its requests for appeal for parking violations related to parking meters, city parking lots and city parking garages. The parking division will implement a new process for collections and appeals for violators cited for parking nuisance violations: I. After I5 days of non-payment, the Parking Violations Bureau will send a default notice to the vehicle's registered owner (the violator) notifying them that they have incurred a twenty five dollar ($25) late fee and that payment is due within fifteen (I5) days from the date ofthe default notice. 2. lf payment is not received within fifteen (15) days from the date of the default notice, Parking Violations Bureau staff will pursue all remedies for collection. Upon researching collection opportunities, we have learned that our current parking management software company, T2 Systems Inc. provides collection services and that they have a substantial collection rate. Through our preliminary discussions, we have discovered that the vendor offers three options for payment for these services: 1. The city of Santa Fe pays the full price for the collection services; 2. T2 Systems Inc. will keep a percentage ofthe collected amount; or 3. T2 Systems Inc. will pass their collection fee onto the violator. In option three, the city will collect I 00% of the outstanding violation amount and the customer will be charged an additional fee for the collection services. The parking division will establish a separate section called the Parking Violations Bureau which will be comprised of a supervisor and two additional staff members whose job duties will be dedicated to the new nuisance violation adjudication processes to include management of the collection agency contract and the existing citation adjudication processes in conjunction with Municipal Court. In addition to these two processes the Parking Violations Bureau will be solely responsible for the management of the online appeal and citation module of our parking management system which is expected to be implemented by late October of this year. This will allow for greater customer service, internal controls, efficiencies, and thorough accountability. Establishing the Parking Violations Bureau outside of the current parking accounting section will create a needed separation of duties. There are currently two full-time and one part-time staff members that work in Parking's accounting section who are assigned and responsible for providing direct citation adjudication job functions. These staff members are responsible for attending Municipal Court, collecting, researching and preparing all required documentation to be presented to the judge during parking court, making all necessary account adjustments and ensuring that all relative correspondence is scanned and attached to the customer accounts in our parking management software system as required by our new internal controls. These same staff members are also responsible for providing the same job functions for the requests for dismissals that are received directly through the parking division and are presented to the Judge separately from parking court. Unfortunately, these same staffmembers also have additional, critical job duties separate and apart from addressing Citation adjudication, one position being the supervisor of the accounting section. This has proven to be challenging over the years, primarily because this excess citation adjudication paperwork is quite time consuming and takes the accounting supervisor as well as two key staff members away from other supervisory and needed services, the lack of system automation within the Parking Division and Municipal Court, in addition to the extra internal control processes implemented as a result of the 2013 forensic audit. Ifthis code amendment is approved, the parking division can hire additional staff that will absorb the adjudication duties and restore the accounting section supervisor and support staff to their original job duties. ln addition, the division can potentially collect up to 95% of 3 the fines which could potentially result in an estimated additional two hundred seventy one thousand six hundred eighty eight dollars ($271 ,688) in revenue. In speaking with Municipal Court Judge Ann Yalman, her main concern is that patrons who wish to appeal a parking violation will be confused about whether they have to appear in Municipal Court or before a Hearing Officer. In order to avoid confusion and make the process as clear as possible, we plan to issue two separate types of notices that clearly identify whether the patron should present their case for appeal to the Municipal Court or to the Hearing Officer. Judie A mer, former Assistant City Attorney, reported during the June 17, 2014, Public Safety Committee meeting that the parking division can only collect on cases that have been filed one year from the date the citation was issued. Ms. Amer also reported that she believes the parking division can collect on the outstanding citations issued in 2013. Therefore, the estimated uncollectable debt is approximately seven million six hundred ninety two thousand five hundred thi1ty dollars ($7,692,530) in parking violation fines issued between 2000 and July 7, 2013. The proposed effective date of this ordinance is January 2015 which should allow sufficient time for parking management to: • Hire a Hearing Officer; • Establish the Parking Violation Bureau as a separate entity from parking's accounting section and hire I transfer staff; • Revise internal standard operating procedures and provide training to staff; • Order additional supplies as needed; • Develop a strategic public relations campaign Requested Action: Staff is recommending approval of this code amendment. 4 1 CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO 2 BILL NO. 2014- 3 INTRODUCED BY: 4 5 Councilor Bill Dimas 6 7 8 9 10 AN ORDINANCE 11 REPEALING AND READOPTING ARTICLE IX OF THE UNIFORM TRAFFIC 12 ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THAT PARKING VIOLATIONS RELATED TO PARKING 13 METERS, CITY PARKING LOTS AND CITY PARKING GARAGES ARE NUISANCES 14 AND SUBJECT TO ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION; AND MAKING SUCH OTHER 15 CHANGES AS ARE NECESSARY TO MEET THE PURPOSES OF THIS ORDINANCE. 16 17 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SANTA FE: 18 Section 1. [REPEAL] Article 12-9, of the City of Santa Fe Uniform Traffic 19 Ordinance, (being Ord. #2006-34, as amended) is repealed. 20 Section 2. A new Article 12-9 of the City of Santa Fe Uniform Traffic Ordinance is 21 ordained to read: 22 ARTICLE IX [NEW MATERIAL] PARKING 23 12-9-1 ADMINISTRATION. The parking division director has the authority to administer 24 the provisions of Article 12-9.* 25 12-9-2 DEFINITIONS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brooklyn Heights Police Blotter
    BROOKLYN HEIGHTS POLICE BLOTTER 6/29/21 Driver stopped on Granger Road; located marijuana and large bag of edibles; charges pending further investigation. Two-car accident on I-480 E/B; driver cited for assured clear distance ahead; turned over to North Royalton PD on their warrant; vehicle towed. Driver cited for speed 48/25 on Schaaf Road. Provided mutual aid to Independence PD regarding male with gun running through parking lots on Quarry Lane. Business on Valley Belt requesting special attention regarding a suspicious vehicle. Dump truck lost roller and tarp on Granger Road and hit street light; turned over to Independence PD and Fire. Courtesy ride given to pedestrian on I-480 E/B. 6/30/21 Report of unwanted guest on West 5th Street; gone on arrival. 7/1/21 Advised resident on Marko Lane regarding removing tree with a pick-up truck to use chain saw and then have stump removed; will comply. Two-car accident on I-480 E/B; driver cited for assured clear distance ahead. Driver cited for driving under suspension and expired tags; owner turned over to Maple Heights PD on their warrant; operator advised on warrant with Cleveland PD; vehicle towed. 7/2/21 Traffic stop on I-480 W/B; driver advised on marked lanes; passenger turned over to Streetsboro PD on their warrant. Driver cited for speed on Granger Road. Driver on I-480 E/B cited for speed 83/60 and driving under suspension; vehicle towed. 7/3/21 Driver on Granger Road cited for speed and no driver’s license.
    [Show full text]
  • Parking Ordinances
    VIOLATION CODES FOR PARKING TICKETS Violation Ordinance Fine Fine if towed Code 001 Expired Meter (Municipal Lot) - Did park a motor $25 $90 vehicle in a municipal lot without paying or depositing in the meter, for said stall, the appropriate fee. 002 Alternate Parking 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Jenifer $25 $90 St.) - Did park a motor vehicle on a public street with a posted sign requiring alternate parking 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Jenifer St. 003 Overtime Limit (3 hour Law Park) - Did park a motor $25 $90 vehicle on municipal property outside a designated stall, or without a boat trailer or for more than (3) hours. 004 Street Storage (48 hour limit) - Did permit a vehicle $25 $90 to remain standing upon a street in the city of Madison for a period of 48 consecutive hours or more. 005 Overtime Parking (8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.) (Street $40 $105 outside of meter zone) 2 hour zone - Did park, stop or leave standing, whether attended or unattended, any day except Sundays and Holidays, a vehicle in the City of Madison between the hours of 8 a.m. and 6 p.m., on a restricted street in excess of 2 hours. 006 Overtime Parking (1 hour zone - streets not $40 $105 metered) - Did park a vehicle in the City of Madison between the hours of 8a.m. and 6p.m. on any day except Sundays and Holidays, on a restricted street in excess of 1 hour. 007 Overtime Parking (Misc.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Solana Beach) To: Citation Processing Center, P
    CITATION / TICKET INFORMATION (page 1 of 2) GENERAL INFORMATION: You may obtain more information regarding a citation by calling 1-800-989-2058. The City’s parking regulations are outlined under Title 10, Chapters 10.28 and 10.32 of the Municipal Code. The Municipal Code is available at City Hall for public viewing or can be accessed online at www.cityofsolanabeach.org PAYMENTS: Payment for tickets is not accepted at City Hall. Citations should be paid by mail, sending the proper penalty amount in Money Order or Check (payable to the City of Solana Beach) to: Citation Processing Center, P. O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. Please do not send cash. Enclose the notice of parking violation with your payment and/or proof of correction. Payment by credit card may be made online at www.citationprocessingcenter.com or by calling 1-800-989-2058. APPEALS or REQUESTS FOR REVIEW: Appeals are not accepted at City Hall. All citation appeals are handled in writing, with a written explanation and request for administrative review sent to: Citation Processing Center, P.O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. TICKET Corrections / Sign-Off: - Correctable Violations (Registration, License Plates) may be corrected by the City’s Code Compliance Officer (858- 720-2412) or San Diego County Sheriff’s Department. - Disabled Person Parking Placard: This is no longer a correctable offense, therefore sign-offs can no longer be issued by the issuing officer. You may elect to send copies of documents to the ticket vendor (DataTicket, information on back of tickets) for their consideration of waiving the ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 5 TRAFFIC 5-05/000.00 TRAFFIC ADMINISTRATION Unit
    VOLUME 5 - CHAPTER 5 TRAFFIC 5-05/000.00 TRAFFIC ADMINISTRATION Unit Commanders are responsible for the administration of traffic programs within contract cities and for ensuring that appropriate action is taken in all Station/Unit areas when violations are observed and traffic collisions are reported. 5-05/000.05 TRAFFIC SUPERVISOR The Unit Commander shall appoint a Lieutenant or Sergeant as the Station/Unit traffic supervisor. The traffic supervisor shall: ensure traffic training of personnel; ensure supervision of traffic Units; conduct specialized follow-up traffic investigation; review Traffic Collision Reports (CHP-555); review completed Notice to Appear (SH-CR-66) and Notice of Parking Violation (SH-CR-67) citations; develop, maintain and supervise a selective enforcement program; gather, maintain, analyze and display statistical traffic data; gather, analyze and forward statistical information to the Traffic Services Detail on a monthly basis; supervise and assist Deputies at the scene of serious injury and fatal traffic collisions which occur within the Station's/Unit’s patrol area; and provide assistance as needed, to members of the Traffic Collision Response Team investigating any employee-involved traffic collision within the Station’s/Unit’s patrol area. 5-05/000.10 ADMINISTRATIVE AND TRAINING DIVISION, TRAFFIC SERVICES DETAIL The Traffic Services Detail shall: be notified and respond to investigate any traffic collision which involves a Department vehicle or Department on-duty employee when there is a death resulting
    [Show full text]
  • Article Iii. - Parking, Stopping and Standing
    ARTICLE III. - PARKING, STOPPING AND STANDING DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Sec. 29-30. - Penalties for violation of parking regulations. (a) Penalties shall be levied as follows against the registered owners of motor vehicles found in violation of parking regulations: GROUP I: $20.00 penalty for violation of parking regulation: Beyond posted time Meter expired Meter repeater Occupying 2 spaces Away from curb 72-hour parking Commercial vehicle in residential area GROUP II: $30.00 penalty for violation of parking regulation: Parking prohibited Obstructing driveway Mayor's proclamation Loading zone Entrance to public building Unauthorized off street Residential parking zone GROUP III: $50.00 penalty for violation of parking regulation: Fire zone 10 feet of hydrant Illegal repair Street cleaning 25 feet of corner Safety zone 25 feet of stop sign Bus stop Vehicle on sidewalk No standing 25 feet of crosswalk Obstructing traffic Wrong way on a one-way street Wrong side of street Delinquent parking tickets (tow ordered) GROUP IV: $100.00 penalty for violation of parking regulation: Snow Emergency GROUP V: $150.00 penalty for violation of parking regulation: Handicapped Zone If voluntary appearance and payment are made within the specified period of fifteen (15) calendar days at the office of the tag division of the city, or if payment is made by use of the postal system within said period, acceptance of such payment by the city shall constitute waiver of the right to further prosecution for each such violation. Any person wishing to contest a violation of this section may request and file an application for contestment at the Department of Traffic and Parking, City of New Haven, at 200 Orange Street, during the hours of 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mail-In Violations and Infractions Schedule Penalties to Be Accepted by the Centralized Infractions Bureau Effective December 1, 2020 (Unless Otherwise Noted)
    CHART A STATE OF CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT www.jud.ct.gov Mail-In Violations and Infractions Schedule Penalties to be Accepted by the Centralized Infractions Bureau Effective December 1, 2020 (Unless otherwise noted) NOTE CONCERNING VIOLATIONS OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 9B: This chart reflects the status of the enforcement provisions of Executive Order 9B, regarding face coverings and public gatherings, as of the date of publication. Subsequent to publication, some of these provisions may have changed or expired due to the fluid nature of the public health emergency and the civil preparedness emergency declared by Governor Ned Lamont in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in the United States and Connecticut. The reader is cautioned to refer to https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/Governors-Actions/Executive-Orders/Governor- Lamonts-Executive-Orders for the current status of Executive Orders contained herein. © 2020, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut Table of Contents PREFACE ........................................................................................................ 1 FOREST AND PARK....................................................................................25 MOTOR VEHICLES - Numerical Order ........................................................ 3 WATER RESOURCES, FLOOD AND EROSION CONTROL ...................26 MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY/OPERATION STANDARDS....................... 15 FISHERIES AND GAME..............................................................................26 OVERWEIGHT
    [Show full text]
  • Pueblo Traffic Code
    PUEBLO TRAFFIC CODE A compilation of the 1995 edition of the Model Traffic Code for Colorado Municipalities and amendments made by the City of Pueblo Published by COLORADO CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 323 West Drake Road, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80526-8115 (800) 352-9229 ♦ (970) 498-9229 [email protected] ♦ www.colocode.com TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 of Title XV, Pueblo Municipal Code Sec. 15-1-1 Adoption of Model Traffic Code; deletions Sec. 15-1-2 Applicability of Chapter in Pueblo Memorial Airport Sec. 15-1-3 Applicability of Chapter in Pueblo Mountain Park Sec. 15-1-4 Airport traffic; enforcement of laws; section added Sec. 15-1-5 Park traffic; enforcement of laws Sec. 15-1-6 Penalties for violations of this Chapter Sec. 15-1-7 Parking on private property; burden of proof Sec. 15-1-8 Amendments and additions Sec. 15-1-9 Drag racing; speed or acceleration exhibit Sec. 15-1-10 Motorized vehicles in certain areas Sec. 15-1-11 Parking meter tokens; sale; distribution Sec. 15-1-12 Reserved Sec. 15-1-13 School crossing guard program Sec. 15-1-14 Reserved Sec. 15-1-15 Owner liability for traffic signal camera violations Pueblo Traffic Code Article I Part 1 Traffic Regulation - Generally 101 102 103 Scope and effect of Model Traffic Code - exceptions to provisions 104 105 Local traffic control devices 106 Who may restrict right to use highways 107 Obedience to police officers 108 Public officers to obey provisions - exceptions for emergency vehicles 109 Motorized bicycles, animals, skis, skates, toy vehicles, and all-terrain recreational vehicles
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Making Analysis on Parking Meters Ruzanna Davtyan University
    ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3-5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA. Decision Making Analysis on Parking Meters Ruzanna Davtyan Department Of Technology Management University Of Bridgeport Bridgeport, CT, USA [email protected] Abstract—this paper examines the use of on-street parking • To estimate whether it is profitable for the city of meters to answer questions about parking behavior, violations, Stamford to maintain the meters in the in this part of enforcement, and revenue. As a case study the City of Stamford the city. was used. It uses two sources of data: (1) historical data about parking meter performance for a period of over twenty years, B. Hypothesis: 1965-1986; (2) a survey of selected on-street parking meter sites in downtown Stamford. It shows that an increased enforcement Before collecting any data, our hypothesis were the and penalties reduce illegal parking, while an increase in the following: value of walking and searching time will increase this activity • The average amount of money that costumer spent on Keywords—decision analysis, parking meter, violation. these 24 meters was $1.00. • The probability of getting a ticket was 0.5. I. INTRODUCTION • The Parking authority officer would visit the site every couple of hours. On-street parking meters are important part of American city. The objectives of these parking meters are: to promote C. Setting Description: parking revenue; to provide short-term parking spaces for; to The data was collected from 24 parking meters located on improve traffic circulation. The parker himself activates a Summer Street in the city of Stamford.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-1 Title 15 Motor Vehicles, Traffic and Parking1
    15-1 TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING1 CHAPTER 1. MISCELLANEOUS. 2. ADMINISTRATION. 3. TRAFFIC DIVISION. 4. TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS BUREAU. 5. CITATIONS FOR TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS. 6. TRAFFIC ENGINEER. 7. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 8. SPEED. 9. TURNING, ETC., MOVEMENTS. 10. ONE-WAY STREETS AND ALLEYS. 11. STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING. 12. SPECIAL STOPS. 13. PARKING METERS. 14. ABANDONED, JUNKED OR WRECKED VEHICLES. 15. BICYCLES AND SHARED MOBILITY. 16. PEDESTRIANS. 17. ACCIDENTS. 18. AUTOMATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. 1Charter references Insurance coverage: § 7.35 Traffic regulation by city manager: § 45.10. Municipal code references Ambulance services: title 9, chapter 21. Fire protection: title 7. Law enforcement: title 6. Streets and sidewalks, etc.: title 16. State law references Motor and other vehicles: Tennessee Code Annotated, title 55. Adoption of statutes and regulations by municipalities: Tennessee Code Annotated, § 55-10-307. Enforcement within municipalities: Tennessee Code Annotated, § 55-10-308. Traffic citations: Tennessee Code Annotated, § 7-63-101, et seq. 15-2 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 15-101. Definitions. 15-102. Enforcement. 15-103. Obedience to police and fire officials. 15-104. Obedience to traffic regulations--persons propelling pushcarts or riding animals. 15-105. Obedience to traffic regulations--public employees. 15-106. Use of coasters, roller skates, etc. 15-107. Authorized emergency vehicles--operation generally. 15-108. Authorized emergency vehicles--operation of other vehicles upon approach. 15-109. Following fire apparatus. 15-110. Crossing fire hose. 15-111. Processions generally--driving in. 15-112. Processions generally--permit. 15-113. Funeral processions--driving other vehicles through. 15-114. Funeral processions--identification. 15-115. Driving vehicles on sidewalks.
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th District Court Fine Schedule Mandatory Court: If "Mandatory Court" Appears Under Fine Column, Call Court to Schedule Hearing
    37th District Court Fine Schedule Mandatory Court: If "Mandatory Court" appears under Fine column, call Court to schedule hearing. Offense Description Fine Type Points Code 3810 2 OR MORE UNPAID HANDICAPPED PARKING VIOLATIONS Mandatory Court C/I 0 3805 6 OR MORE UNPAID PARKING VIOLATIONS Mandatory Court C/I 0 9926 ABANDONED VEHICLE $155.00 C/I 0 9983 ALCOHOL IN PARK $240.00 Misd. 0 2881 ALLOW PASSENGER TO CLING ON VEHICLE $155.00 C/I 2 1340 ALLOW PERSON UNDER INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL TO DRIVE Mandatory Court Misd. 0 1341 ALLOW PERSON UNDER INFLUENCE OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OR OTHER INTOXICATING SUBSTANCE TO DRIVE Mandatory Court Misd. 0 3280 ALLOW UNLICENSED PERSON TO DRIVE Mandatory Court Misd. 0 3260 ALTERED OPERATOR'S LICENSE Mandatory Court Misd. 0 9820 AMUSEMENT CIVIL INFRACTION VIOLATION $265.00 C/I 0 9827 ANIMAL CIVIL INFRACTION $165.00 C/I 0 9975 ANIMAL VIOLATION - TOO MANY DOGS/CATS (Warren Only) $240.00 Misd. 0 9771 ANIMAL/ DOG/ CAR RUNNING AT LARGE (Center Line Only) Mandatory Court Misd. 0 9971 ANIMAL/ DOG/ CAT RUNNING AT LARGE (Warren Only) $240.00 Misd. 0 9781 ANIMALS/ DOGS-SANITARY REQUIREMENT (Center Line Only) Mandatory Court Misd. 0 1624 ATTEMPTED LEAVING THE SCENE OF ACCIDENT INVOLVING INJURY Mandatory Court Misd. 6 1632 ATTEMPT--FAIL TO STOP OR IDENTIFY AT ACCIDENT INVOLVING DAMAGE TO ATTENDED/UNATTENDED VEHICLE Mandatory Court Misd. 2 9954 BACKING MORE THAN 60 FEET. $155.00 C/I 0 2550 BARRICADE, DROVE AROUND $155.00 C/I 2 9905 BICYCLE VIOLATION $155.00 C/I 0 8910 BICYCLE FAIL TO RIDE ON RIGHT SIDE OF ROAD $155.00 C/I 0 8911 BICYCLE NO HEAD LAMP $155.00 C/I 0 9968 BUILDING AND/OR CODE VIOLATIONS $265.00 C/I 0 9821 BUILDING CIVIL INFRACTION VIOLATION $265.00 C/I 0 1810 CARELESS DRIVING $205.00 C/I 3 1812 CARELESS DRIVING (P.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Rules Payout Schedules
    Administrative Rules Payout Schedules TABLE OF CONTENTS Ohio Revised Code Cincinnati Municipal Code CINCINNATI PARKING INFRACTIONS CINCINNATI MUNICIPAL CODE (rev. 11/14) OHIO REVISED CODE VIOLATIONS CRIMINAL MINOR MISDEMEANOR OHIO DIVISION OF NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF WATERCRAFT THE SOUTHWESTERN OHIO UNIFORM FIRE CODE CINCINNATI WASTE DISPOSAL CHAPTER 729 VIOLATIONS CINCINNATI LITTERING CHAPTER 714 VIOLATIONS CINCINNATI LITTERING CHAPTER 701, 723, 843, 846 VIOLATIONS CINCINNATI PARK BOARD RULES HAMILTON CO. PARK DISTRICT ANDERSON TOWNSHIP PARK DISTRICT RULES & REGULATIONS CROSBY TOWNSHIP PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE DELHI TOWNSHIP PARK RULES GREEN TOWNSHIP PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE HAMILTON CO. ZONING VIOLATIONS CINCINNATI PARKING INFRACTIONS By Agreement between the City of Cincinnati and Hamilton County Cincinnati Municipal Code Code Section DESCRIPTION TOTAL PAYOUT 502-3 Parking prohibitions during street sweeping operations $50.00 508-1 Stopping and parking $50.00 508-1A Unauthorized stopping and parking 50.00 508-1A(d) Parking within 10' feet of a fire hydrant 250.00 508-2 Parking and stopping restrictions, unauthorized 50.00 508-3 Parking so as to create obstruction prohibited 50.00 508-6 No standing and no parking zones 50.00 508-7 Truck loading zones 50.00 508-8 No standing, no stopping, no parking zones, designated 50.00 508-11 Parking of trucks restricted 50.00 508-12 Parking unreasonable time 50.00 508-17 Trucks obstructing traffic 50.00 508-21 Parking in bus stops 50.00 508-22 Unlawful parking of taxicabs 50.00 508-23 Trailer
    [Show full text]
  • Opinion of the Court, in Which Mcdonald, Oxley, and Mcdermott, JJ., Joined
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0267 Submitted October 15, 2020—Filed March 5, 2021 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. JASMAINE R. WARREN, Appellant. On review from the Iowa Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott D. Rosenberg, Judge. The defendant seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming her conviction for driving while revoked. DECISION OF COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART; DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Christensen, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which McDonald, Oxley, and McDermott, JJ., joined. Mansfield, J., filed a special concurrence. Appel, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Waterman, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Gina Messamer (argued) of Parrish Kruidenier Dunn Boles Gribble Gentry Brown & Bergmann L.L.P., Des Moines, for appellant. 2 Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Israel Kodiaga (argued), Assistant Attorney General, John P. Sarcone, County Attorney, and Kailyn M. Heston, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee. 3 CHRISTENSEN, Chief Justice. Is it unconstitutional for an officer to enforce a parking violation after he observes a driver illegally park her vehicle, leaving the vehicle sticking out of the driveway and into the road? If the officer smells marijuana and observes signs of the driver’s intoxication when he stops the driver to enforce the parking violation, is it unconstitutional for the officer to inquire about the driver’s intoxication when the officer could have enforced the parking violation by placing a citation on the driver’s window instead of stopping her? If the officer asks the defendant for her license while he’s enforcing the parking violation and discovers the driver’s license is revoked, is it unconstitutional to extend his stop to enforce that violation? Is there any legally meaningful distinction between a parking and a moving violation for Terry stop purposes? These are the questions we must answer in this case.
    [Show full text]