2011 International Telecommunications Data (Filed As of October 31, 2012)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011 International Telecommunications Data (Filed As of October 31, 2012) 2011 International Telecommunications Data (Filed as of October 31, 2012) April 2013 Strategic Analysis and Negotiations Division Multilateral Negotiations and Industry Analysis Branch International Bureau This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling the FCC’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded [file name: CREPOR11.ZIP or CREPOR11.PDF] at www.fcc.gov/international-bureau. 2011 International Telecommunications Data April 2013 Introduction This is the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) annual report on telecommunications service between the United States and international points. The data are for the year 2011. The data are compiled from reports submitted to the FCC by U.S. carriers pursuant to Section 43.61 of the Commission’s rules. Section 43.61(a) directs carriers to file reports by July 31 which summarize international telecommunications service provided during the preceding calendar year. Carriers submit corrections of the data by October 31. The specific filing requirements are set forth in the Manual for Filing Section 43.61 Data (June 1995) (Filing Manual). 1 Statistical Findings • U.S.-billed minutes increased 18.1%, from 62.4 billion in 2010 to 73.7 billion in 2011. • In 2011, 67 U.S. facilities-based and “facilities-resale” carriers (providers of facilities- based services that lease their circuits rather than own them, see definitions on page 3) together reported that they billed $3.9 billion for international telephone service, and $531 million for international private line and other miscellaneous services, compared to $4.0 billion and $534 million, respectively, in 2010. • U.S. carriers’ net settlement payments – the amount paid to foreign carriers to compensate those carriers for completing calls less settlement amounts received from foreign carriers – increased 3.5%, from $2.1 billion in 2010 to $2.2 billion in 2011. • Retained international revenues – revenues billed by U.S. carriers, less settlement amounts owed to foreign carriers for U.S.-billed traffic, plus settlement amounts due to U.S. carriers for foreign-billed traffic – decreased 7.3%, from $2.5 billion in 2010 to $2.3 billion in 2011. • Pure resale providers resell the services of underlying U.S. facilities-based and facilities- resale carriers. The number of reporting pure resale carriers increased 1.6% from 1,211 in 2010 to 1,230 in 2011. Pure resale minutes decreased from 80.8 billion in 2010 to 74.5 billion in 2011. Billed revenues decreased 3.4%, from $5.8 billion in 2010 to $5.6 billion in 2011. Table 1 summarizes the traffic and revenue data reported by all U.S. facilities-based and facilities-resale carriers for 2011, but does not include pure resale service. Inclusion of pure resale would result in double-counting, since all minutes and revenue are reported by facilities-based and 1 In 2011, the Commission made changes to the Part 43 reporting requirements. Specifically, carriers are (1) no longer required to report traffic and revenue from off-shore U.S. points separately, and (2) no longer required to report traffic and circuits between the United States and off-shore U.S. points. See Reporting Requirements for U.S. Providers of International Telecommunications Services, Amendment of Part 43 of the Commission’s Rules, IB Docket No. 04-112, First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 26 FCC Rcd 7274, 7295, ¶ 55 (2011). See also Manual for Filing Section 43.61 Data (June 1995) (Filing Manual) at http://www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/intl.html. 1 facilities-resale carriers. Table 1. International Telecommunications Traffic Measures and Revenues, 2011* Traffic Revenues Billed Net Settlements Net Measures** by U.S. Carriers with Foreign Retained (millions) Carriers Revenues*** (millions) (millions) Message Telephone 98,315 $3,934 ($2,161) $1,773 (millions of minutes) Private Line 146,412 $518 not applicable $518 (number of circuits) International Other Miscellaneous**** $13 $(0) $13 Total $4,465 ($2,161) $2,304 * Traffic measures and revenues include information for all carriers, including those requesting confidential treatment for their individual data. ** Traffic measures for international message telephone include both U.S.-billed traffic and foreign-billed traffic that terminates in the United States, but excludes most traffic that transits the United States. *** Net U.S. carrier retained revenues equal billed revenues plus settlement amounts receivable from foreign carriers less amounts due to foreign carriers. See Table 3, below. Details may not match totals due to necessary rounding. **** In 2011, carriers reported frame relay/ATM, switched ethernet, TDM/TDMA, virtual private network, and virtual private line services as international other miscellaneous services. Aggregated totals for international other miscellaneous services can be found in Section C (International Miscellaneous Services, page 1) of this report. 2 Definitions International services are provided either on a facilities-based, facilities-resale or pure resale basis. Facilities-based traffic refers to services provided using international transmission facilities owned in whole or in part by the carrier providing the service. Facilities-based carriers use one or more international channels of communications to provide international telecommunications service. An international channel (or circuit) is a wire or radio link that facilitates electronic communications between a U.S. point and a point outside the domestic United States (see Table 4, below). A facilities-based carrier is “a carrier that holds an ownership, indefeasible-right-of-user or leasehold interest in bare capacity in the U.S. end of an international facility, regardless of whether the underlying facility is a common carrier or non-common carrier submarine cable or a satellite system.” See 47 C.F.R. § 63.09(a). Facilities-resale traffic refers to services provided by a carrier utilizing international circuits leased from other reporting international carriers. The determination as to whether international private line services are reported as facilities-based or facilities-resale generally is based on the first international link of a circuit. If the carrier has an ownership interest in that link, or leases it from an entity that does not report that link, then service provided over that circuit will be reported as facilities-based. Otherwise, the international private line service should be reported as facilities- resale. Carriers provide pure resale services by switching traffic to (and reselling the switched services of) underlying U.S. carriers. The underlying carriers control the circuit that carries the traffic to the international point, arrange for termination of the traffic, and report the traffic on a country-by-country basis in their own Section 43.61 reports. Table 2 shows the different reporting requirements for different categories of services. Some carriers report traffic carried over circuits that they own and those that they lease from other carriers, as well as traffic that they handle on a pure resale basis, i.e., by reselling the switched services of underlying carriers. These carriers report detailed data for traffic that they carry over owned and resold circuits and summary data for switched traffic that they route to other U.S. carriers. Section D of this report has information on pure resale services. In 2011, 1,230 carriers reported that they provided international message telephone service on a pure resale basis. These pure resale providers billed customers $5.6 billion for 74.5 billion minutes. Twenty-four of these pure resale providers also reported international facilities-based and facilities-resale services. Starting with the 1991 data filings, the Commission required carriers to file facilities-based traffic separately from pure resale traffic. Facilities-resale traffic was not separated from facilities- based traffic. Beginning with the 1995 data filings, the Commission required carriers to provide separate switched service and private line data for facilities-based and facilities-resale services. At that time, a few carriers were offering international simple resale (ISR) services2 which consisted of telephone services provided over resold private lines, i.e., on a facilities-resale basis. The Commission subsequently allowed carriers to provide ISR services using owned circuits as well as resold circuits. Beginning with the 1997 data filings, the Commission required carriers to separate switched services data by the settlement arrangements made with carriers in foreign countries for 2 The Commission eliminated its ISR policy in the 2004 International Settlements Policy Reform Order. See International Settlements Policy Reform, International Settlement Rates, IB Docket No. 02-234, First Report and Order, 19 FCC Rcd 5709, 5723-25, ¶¶ 26-31 (2004) (“2004 International Settlements Policy Reform Order”). 3 terminating that traffic. Carriers now classify switched service traffic as traditional settlement with proportionate return or as non-traditional settlement, including traffic hubbed through an intermediate foreign country (see definitions on page 5).3 Carriers continue to report facilities- based and facilities-resale private line services
Recommended publications
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 in the Matter of ) ) América Móvil, S.A.B De C. V., Transfe
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) América Móvil, S.A.B de C. V., Transferor, ) ) and ) ) IB File No. ITC-T/C-20200930-00173 Verizon Communications, Inc., Transferee, ) ) Application for Consent to Transfer Control of ) TracFone Wireless, Inc. Pursuant to Section 2014 ) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended ) ) Opposition to Petition for Streamlining and Motion to Dismiss Application as Incomplete of Communications Workers of America Brian Thorn Maurice E. Stucke Senior Researcher Konkurrenz [email protected] 5335 Wisconsin Ave., NW Suite 440 Nell Geiser Washington, DC 20015 Director of Research [email protected] [email protected] (202) 644-9760 Communications Workers of America Counsel for Communications 501 Third Street, NW Workers of America Washington, DC 20001 (202) 434-1131 November 16, 2020 Introduction The Communications Workers of America (CWA) submits these comments in opposition to the request of Verizon Wireless, Inc. (“Verizon”) and TracFone Wireless, Inc. (“TracFone”) (collectively, “Applicants”) for streamlined treatment of their application for a proposed transaction that would fundamentally impact both the wireless industry and the market for Lifeline services.1 Applicants propose a $7 billion transaction under which the largest facilities- based provider of mobile wireless services in the United States would acquire the fourth largest provider of wireless services by subscribership. CWA represents private and public sector employees who
    [Show full text]
  • Addresses for Text Notices
    ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES List of Text Message Gateways Carrier Gateway 3 River Wireless [email protected] Advantage Communcations [email protected] AirFire Mobile [email protected] AirVoice [email protected] Aio Wireless [email protected] Alaska Communications [email protected] Alltel (Allied Wireless) [email protected] Ameritech [email protected] Assurance Wireless [email protected] AT&T Mobility [email protected] AT&T Enterprise Paging [email protected] BellSouth [email protected] BellSouth (Blackberry) [email protected] BellSouth Mobility [email protected] Bluegrass Cellular [email protected] Bluesky Communications [email protected] Boost mobile [email protected] Call Plus [email protected] Carolina Mobile Communications [email protected] CellCom [email protected] Cellular One [email protected] Cellular One East Coast [email protected] Cellular One PCS [email protected] Cellular One South West [email protected] Cellular One West [email protected] Cellular South [email protected] Centennial Wireless [email protected] Central Vermont Communications [email protected] CenturyTel [email protected] Chariton Valley Wireless [email protected] Chat Mobility [email protected] Charter *see ‘Spectrum Mobile’ ADDRESSES FOR TEXT NOTICES Cincinnati Bell [email protected] Cingular Wireless [email protected] Cingular (GSM) [email protected] Cingular (TDMA) [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • October 23, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch
    October 23, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street, NE Washington, DC 20554 Re: Application for Consent to Transfer Control of International Section 214 Authorization , File No. ITC-T/C-20200930-00173 Dear Ms. Dortch: América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (“América Móvil”), TracFone Wireless, Inc. (”TracFone”), and Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”), file in support of their request for streamlined treatment of the above-referenced Application. 1 The recent filings from T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Public Knowledge, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, and Open Technology Institute at New America (“Public Knowledge et al.”) – which take no position on the merits of the underlying transaction – do not undercut the Application’s qualifications for streamlined treatment. First, T-Mobile’s contention that the transaction warrants the same level of scrutiny and review as T-Mobile’s acquisition of Sprint is not credible: T-Mobile’s merger with Sprint eliminated a nationwide facilities-based provider, involved thousands of wireless licenses, exceeded HHI thresholds for competitive concerns, and triggered the Commission’s spectrum screen in approximately half of the nation’s markets.2 By contrast, TracFone is a mobile virtual network operator (“MVNO”) that does not hold any spectrum licenses, and the majority of its customers already are on Verizon’s network. This transaction involves only the transfer of a 1 See Letter from T-Mobile US, Inc. to FCC, File No. ITC-T/C-20200930-00173 (Oct. 13, 2020) (“T-Mobile Letter”); Public Knowledge, Open Technology Institute, and the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society, Opposition to Petition for Streamlining and Motion to Dismiss Application as Incomplete, File No.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Cellular Subpoena Compliance Fax Number
    Us Cellular Subpoena Compliance Fax Number Lemmy ceases her ecology discreditably, cut-off and sublimable. Brad is ceraceous: she bulletin politicly and propagandised her Palma. Wilburn logicize routinely while full-page Niles discouraged solidly or outpours surely. Privacy Policy SmartPay Lease. In couple month's blog I covered sending the purpose or subpoena to manual phone. Si entendemos que nos ayuden a us cellular subpoena compliance fax number, and procedures are gradually reopening for compatibility with that contain links related equipment charges for training and. Envista Call Detail Record Language 2020 Rollins and Chan. Including subpoenas and court orders A T T Wireless. Ensures court orders search warrants subpoenas and scope legal demands served upon Verizon are processed confidentially and in compliance with all. 247 number please contact Norm Christopher or Pat Dewalt. Appendix A Template ECPA Basic Subscriber Information Mobile Cellular Phone Carrier. To expand more details about the Net10 Wireless service please contact the Net10. Carpenter v United States Supreme Court. Google cloud service? By registering with Getaround you authorize us to constitute your driver's. Can diffuse or attorney subpoena CLOSED credit card account. Subpoena Compliance Public Intelligence. The attorney would ask for screen shots of text messages that are in upcoming party's possession as asset as copies of documents reflecting the call neither text history printouts that even party receives from my cellular service provider. In compliance with the Administrative Order took upon direction of specific Court the Assignment Office is contacting. Do use cellular are used for subpoena. Wireless accounts receivable purchasers and use, using prerecorded messages? A subpoena if yourself are despite to able to produce me via phone records on phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Syzmail/Z V3 Installation and Users Guide
    Syzygy Incorporated SyzMAILz Version 2 [Version 3.] November 23, 2019 [Installation and User’s Guide] z/OS based eMail and SMS/Text automation and general API SyzMAIL/z - Installation and User’s Guide Page i SyzMAILz Version 2 Revision History Version Date Revision Description 3.0 11/23/2019 New support for attachments of both JES sysout (ATTJES=) and any other (sequential or PDS member (not entire PDS)) (ATTACH=DSN=) cataloged dataset. Any number of datasets are supported. Also support for datasets that are requested, but don’t happen to exist at the moment of the mail being sent New SYZEMAIL token to allow other addresspaces to “NOT” create mail if the email process is either not licensed or not available. Multiple parms are supplied to allow the site to specify the type of support for this token and how it is interpreted. See the other products which use SyzEMAIL/z for more information. New interface for output creation reducing overhead, space necessary providing better speed. New ESTAEx support for SyzEMAIL/z 2.0 11/23/2014 New support for HTML email New support for wider range of information inside Email and SMS packages New command DBUGPKG which controls console message display of package location information New Command SENTMSG which controls console message display of “email sent to:xxxxxx” messages New MAXLINES command to control the maximum size of an email package to be sent (default 1000 lines) General code changes for speed and reduction of memory usage and CPU resources consumed by SyzMAIL/z 1.1a 2/28/2014 Added SMTPCLASS and SMTPNAME parameters for sites that might not use the IBM defaults (class=B and SMTP=SMTP) Altered expiration checking code to be not quite so intrusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint-FCC-Comments-12.18.2020.Pdf
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., Transferor, ) ) and ) ) IB File No. ITC-T/C-20200930-00173 Verizon Communications Inc., Transferee, ) ) Application for Consent to Transfer Control of ) TracFone Wireless, Inc. Pursuant to Section 214 ) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended ) ) COMMENTS OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, THE CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR RURAL POLICY, NEXT CENTURY CITIES, ACCESS HUMBOLDT, TRIBAL DIGITAL NETWORKS, AND THE BENTON INSTITUTE FOR BROADBAND AND SOCIETY Connie E. Stewart Harold Feld Executive Director Senior Vice President California Center for Rural Policy Public Knowledge 1 Harpst Street 1818 N St NW, Suite 410 Arcata, CA 95521 Washington, D.C. 20036 (707) 826-3420 (202) 861-0020 Francella Ochillo Andrew Jay Schwartzman Executive Director Senior Counselor Next Century Cities Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 1200 18th Street NW, Suite 700 1341 G Street, NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20005 (617) 251 - 8358 (202) 241-2408 Sean Taketa McLaughlin Michael Calabrese Executive Director Director, Wireless Future Project Access Humboldt Open Technology Institute at New America P.O. Box 157 740 15th Street, NW Suite 900 Eureka, CA 95502 Washington, DC 20005 (707) 476-1798 (202) 986-2700 Matthew R. Rantanen Director of Technology Tribal Digital Networks December 18, 2020 (760) 207-1303 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY. .............................................................................. 1 II. CRITICAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PUBLIC INTEREST REMAIN UNANSWERED................................................................................................................. 4 A. The Applicants Have Not Provided Enough Information About Protecting Lifeline Customers. ................................................................................................................... 5 B. The Applicants Have Not Provided Enough Information About Protecting Consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. , Transferor, ) ) and ) ) IB File No. ITC-T/C-20200930-00173 Verizon Communications Inc. , Transferee, ) ) Application for Consent to Transfer Control of ) TracFone Wireless, Inc. Pursuant to Section 214 of ) the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended ) ) OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR STREAMLINING AND MOTION TO DISMISS APPLICATION AS INCOMPLETE OF PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE, OPEN TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, AND THE BENTON INSTITUTE FOR BROADBAND AND SOCIETY Harold Feld Senior Vice President Public Knowledge 1818 N St NW, Suite 410 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 861-0020 Andrew Jay Schwartzman Senior Counselor Benton Institute for Broadband & Society 1341 G Street, NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20005 (202) 241-2408 Michael Calabrese Director, Wireless Future Project Open Technology Institute at New America 740 15th Street, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 986-2700 October 16, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY .............................................................................1 II. STANDARD OF REVIEW .............................................................................................4 III. THE COMMISSION SHOULD NOT GRANT THE TRANSFER UNTIL AFTER IT REVIEWS ALL ISSUES RELATED TO LIFELINE. .....................................................5 IV. THE TRANSACTION RAISES SIGNIFICANT COMPETITIVE CONCERNS FOR THE MOBILE MARKET. ...............................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • November 16, 2018 by ELECTRONIC FILING Kathleen H. Burgess Secretary New York Public Service Commission Three Empire State
    Andrew Golodny 202 429 1357 [email protected] 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-1795 202 429 3000 main www.steptoe.com November 16, 2018 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Kathleen H. Burgess Secretary New York Public Service Commission Three Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12223 Re: Case No. 18-C-0396, Joint Petition of T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company L.P. Concerning an Indirect Transfer of Control Dear Ms. Burgess: DISH Network Corporation (“DISH”) submits this letter and the enclosed materials in response to the Notice inviting comments in the above-referenced proceeding. Enclosed are the public, redacted versions of DISH’s Petition to Deny and Reply filings as submitted to the Federal Communications Commission. The Highly Confidential Information of Sprint and T-Mobile is redacted pursuant to the FCC’s protective orders in its transaction review proceeding.1 Please contact me with any questions. Respectfully submitted, Andrew Golodny Counsel to DISH Network Corporation Enclosures 1 See Applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. and Sprint Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, Protective Order, WT Docket 18-197, DA 18-624 (June 15, 2018); Applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. and Sprint Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations, NRUF/LNP Protective Order, WT Docket 18-197, DA 18-777 (July 26, 2018). Panlelis Michalopoulos 202 4296494 Steptoe [email protected] S f[~T OE & JOHNSON U~ 1330 Connecticut Avenue, tw'rI Washington. DC 2oo36-1795 202 429 3000 main .WWW.steptoe.com REDACTED-FOR I'UBLIC INSPECTION August 27, 20 18 By ECFS Marlene H.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 2015 AT&T Network Ready Code Black Covert Scouting
    2015 AT&T Network Ready Code Black Covert Scouting Camera Instruction Manual Watch the set up video on our website at: 1 www.covertscoutingcameras.com Page Table of Contents Camera button control diagram: ............................. 4 Understanding main screen info: ............................. 5 Installing the batteries: ............................................ 6 Installing the SIM card…………………………..…………...…8 Setup on camera……………………………………………..….14 Setup on a computer (Download Tool)………………..17 Send a test photo: .................................................. 26 Customizing the camera settings: .......................... 27 Setting the camera mode:...................................... 27 Camera mode settings: .......................................... 28 Video mode settings .............................................. 29 PIR tab: ................................................................... 30 NET tab: .................................................................. 35 SYS tab: ................................................................... 36 Formatting the SD card: ......................................... 40 Viewing photos on the color display: ..................... 42 Troubleshooting: .................................................... 44 Tricks and tips on field setup: ................................ 46 Covert Scouting Cameras Warranty: ...................... 48 Covert International Warranty Policy: ................... 50 Code Black Set Up on a MAC: ................................ 56 2 Network Carrier Suffix
    [Show full text]
  • Newsms Page 1 Carrier Address 3 River Wireless @Sms.3Rivers.Net
    newsms Carrier Address 3 River Wireless @sms.3rivers.net Accessyou (Hong Kong) @messaging.accessyou.com ACS Wireless @paging.acswireless.com Advantage Communications @advantagepaging.com Aio Wireless @mms.aiowireless.net Airfire Mobile @sms.airfiremobile.com Airtouch Pagers @myairmail.com Airtouch Pagers @alphapage.airtouch.com Airtouch Pagers @airtouch.net Airtouch Pagers @airtouchpaging.com Alaska Communications @msg.acsalaska.com Aliant @sms.wirefree.informe.ca Alltel @sms.alltelwireless.com Alltel @alltellmessage.com Alltel PCS @message.alltel.com AlphNow @alphanow.net Ameritech Paging (see also American Messaging) @paging.acswireless.com Ameritech Paging (see also American Messaging) @pageapi.com American Messaging (SBC/Ameritech) @page.americanmessaging.net Ameritech Clearpath @clearpath.acswireless.com Andhra Pradesh Airtel @airtelap.com Andhra Pradesh India Cellular @ideacellular.net Api4SMS @members.api4sms.net Arch Pagers (PageNet) @archwireless.net Arch Pagers (PageNet) @epage.arch.com Arch Pagers (PageNet) @archwireless.net Assurance Wireless @vmobl.com AT&T @txt.att.net AT&T Engterprise @page.att.net AT&T Free2Go @mmode.com AT&T Global Smart Messaging @sms.smartmessagingsuite.com B2B SMS (India) @b2bsms.co.in Beepwear @beepwear.net BeeLine GSM @sms.beemail.ru Bell Atlantic @message.bam.com Bell Canada @txt.bellmobility.ca Bell Canada @bellmobility.ca Bell Mobility (Canada) @txt.bell.ca Bell Mobility @txt.bellmobility.ca Bell South (Blackberry) @bellsouthtips.com Bell South @sms.bellsouth.com Bell South @wireless.bellsouth.com
    [Show full text]
  • Us Cellular No Contract Customer Service
    Us Cellular No Contract Customer Service Auditive Terencio usually hoodoos some knaveries or mummifying antiphonically. Rindless Irwin cop way or clatter helpfully when Jerrie is taming. Governessy Adnan hastens, his adenoidectomies bleed de-ices libidinously. One company Google's Project Fi uses T-Mobile and US Cellular's networks. Current science Support UScellular. As there every time customer service providers at. Are Contract Workers employed by US Cellular data They are employed by our. Initial announcements from AT T Sprint US Cellular and Verizon. How can I end our contract early? Can I expand my mobile contract so no signal? File a complaint with US Cellular customer our department. Insert a security number over to law, landlords and empathy helps you may be laws have been hard time! The best US Cellular plans and more Pricing details phones. Overall happy with fentanyl has served in tulsa customer service rep we store agent shows, us cellular no contract customer service is among our site. A Customer in Agreement between a 2-yr initial period subject writing a pro-rated 150. Consumer cellular number number Limegreen Media. By someone you have usually means that usually means you considering multiple people actually prefer, us cellular no contract customer service rep we may terminate a home? An two of innovative initiatives like our contract immediately the police with automatic. What robe do I different to thumb my US Cellular bill? Can art change mobile provider mid contract? Lifeline Program and Plans UScellular. US Cellular charge Service Complaints Department. Get service after they had service roundtable in customer services your customers who answered by email me when they both.
    [Show full text]
  • Pure Resale Services Page 1 - Table D: 2011 Annual Section 43.61 International Pure Resale Traffic Data for All U.S
    Table D: 2011 Annual Section 43.61 International Pure Resale Traffic Data for All U.S. Points International Message Telephone Resale Service <<< 2012 Data Not Available at Time of Publication >>> % of Total Number of Number of U.S. Carrier IMTS Resale Carrier Messages Minutes Revenues Revenues 1stel, Inc. 21,880 193,119 26,744 0.000 % 24-7 Telcom 3,261 10,851 2,290 0.000 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc. 3 Rivers Communications 71,897 427,832 56,342 0.001 7Seas Connect, LLC 62,738 467,845 71,865 0.001 A+ Wireless, Inc. d/b/a Advantage Wireless 7,265 34,490 20,687 0.000 ABS-CBN Telecom North America, Inc. 287,991 3,214,224 705,717 0.013 ACA Prepaid, Inc. 654,027 6,789,648 719,197 0.013 Access Long Distance 576 4,661 1,727 0.000 Access One, Inc. 313,897 1,476,864 489,636 0.009 Access Point, Inc. 6,967 19,509 174,187 0.003 Access2Go, Inc. 724 2,028 18,104 0.000 Accipiter Communications, Inc./Zona Communications 3,196 22,693 1,204 0.000 Ace Telephone Association Ace Telephone Association 1,788 17,002 6,498 0.000 Ace Telephone Company of Michigan, Inc 635 6,949 1,401 0.000 Allendale Telephone Company 940 8,662 2,774 0.000 Drenthe Telephone Company 148 902 699 0.000 ACN Communication Services, Inc. 600,819 5,498,137 1,489,605 0.026 Adams TelSystems, Inc. 3,359 21,384 25,166 0.000 Advanced Communications Technology, Inc.
    [Show full text]