Characteristics of Some Paleozoic Clastic Sediments of the Central Appalachians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characteristics of Some Paleozoic Clastic Sediments of the Central Appalachians MASTER'S THESIS M-1128 EISENHARD, Robert M. CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME PALEOZOIC CLASTIC SEDIMENTS OF THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANS. The American University, M.S., 1966 Geology University Microfilms. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME PALEOZOIC CLASTIC SEDIMENTS OF THE CENTRAL APPALACHIANS by Robert M. Eisenhard Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Signatures of Committee: ' y- ^ ChairmaytT-y^ y ' J - ^ > Dean of the College Date : (Lf - Date: ^ __/<^y / 1966 The American University Washington, D. C. AMERICAN utiv,? Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 11 CONTENTS I General Geology, Stratigraphie Section And Area Map ................................. 1 II Collection of Samples (including description of Formations) ........................... 5 III Preparation of Samples ............................ 8 IV Analysis of Samples and Characteristics of Heavy Minerals ........................... 9 V Summary and Conclusions ........................... 15 VI Appendix .......................................... 20 Graph I Distribution by Weight Percent of Sieve Fractions .......................... 21 Graph II Cumulative Percent of Sieve Fractions by Weight Oriskany, Tuscarora and Conococheague ... 22 Graph III Gumulative Percent of Sieve Fractions by Weight Weverton, Antietam, Martinsburg, Bloomsburg ........ 2.3 Graph IV Heavy Minerals as Percent of Size Fraction ................................. 24 Tables I - VII Sieve Fraction Data ................ 25 Table VIII Grain Size and Heavy Mineral Distribu­ tion ................................... 32 References .............................................. 33 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. I. General Geology The clastic rock samples for this study were taken from the northernmost portion of the Appalachian Valley in Virginia. The Appalachian Valley Province (also known as the Valley and Ridge Province) is a subdivision of the Appalachian Highlands. To the southeast of the Appalachian Valley is the Blue Ridge Province and to the northwest, the Appalachian Plateau. Surface exposures in the area show folded and thrust faulted Cambrian, Ordovician, Silurian and Devonian sedimentary rocks which were deposited in the Appalachian geosyncline. Here, essentially continuous sedimentation produced an average of 30,000 feet and a maximum of perhaps 50,000 feet of section. (Butts, 1940, p. 3.) The folding and faulting in some cases make measurements of the stratigraphie thicknesses at best somewhat questionable. The eastern half of the area studied varies from nearly flat to rolling topography. The formations present here are the Tomstown dolomite, Waynesboro formation, Elbrook, Conococheague, and Beckmantown limestones, and the Martinsburg shale. The valley floor is at an altitude of 700' at Winchester rising westward to 1000 feet at the base of Little North Mountain, rising southwest- ward to 1400 feet at Harrisonburg and decreasing eastward to 500 feet at the Shenandoah River (Butts, 1940, p. 7). In the Massanutten Mountain region and in the western half of the area, the tough resistant Tuscarora quartzite along with the Oriskany sandstone support long ridges rising 1000 to 1500 feet above the valley floor. Inside the Tuscarora ridges of the Massanutten syncline, the Romney shale forms the valley. In the western Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. portion of the area, the Jennings and Romney formations form the valley floors. On the eastern margin the Cambrian Weverton formation and Antietam quartzite underlie the eastern ridge. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION FOR THE APPALACHIAN VALLEY IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA (after Cloos, Butts, Stose and others) Formations in CAPITALS are those studied Catskill formation Juniata formation Jennings formation MARTINSBURG SHALE Romney shale Chambersburg limestone % I ORISKANY SANDSTONE St. Paul group Q a > Helderburg limestone o Beekmantown limestone Rockdale Run formation Keyser limestone Stonehenge limestone Tondcway limestone Wills Creek shale CONOCOCHEAGUE LIMESTONE BLOOMSBURG FORMATION Elbrook limestone formation McKenzie formation Waynesboro formation TUSCARORA QUARTZITE Tomstown dolomite § ANTIETAM QUARTZITE Pi Harpers shale Ü WEVERTON FORMATION Loudoun formation Catoctin volcanics Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. f V CD N. ■D X / O Q. / Luray % C \ ^ / p A G E ^ g / Q. /‘■'s . » V roch INGHAM^, o ! ■D yMonterVy^.f Harrisonburg CD J h i g h l a n i ^ AREA STUDIED C/) C/) ^ —( A U G U TA y Staunton 80^ BATH X CD V / Warm°Springs/ \ 38“ 8 38* • 7 \ / wuv> 10 50 MILES ^ALLEOr AN W 7 Lexington/ CD 3. > f\BOTETOURT'" \ v^^^>/ ' 3" «Newcastle CD * ° / X C R A I G / Fincastle y~^, CD ■D V I R G O Q. 81® ^ C Y a V“*“ O r, T/X Grun(|y\_ >, 3 ^<%0NT60MERlf|^-- ^ “' V - "O ^ ‘ySUCH/vNAN y \ O j _ A PULASKI3UL '^^^fcigllvvood \ ,-^t"^A2^-'T AZ EW tw E tL uL. I- 0 0L AI NA N| W»^ y af -Pu<rPuW6ki— 37* ^ '^ICKENSOI^^ jM \V Tazewell,— O ., '/ Blando ^ CD Q. X ) . ) y - ^ \ \ V -3 7 ® \ X 3?y-37%^ WÜWi^— ■] \ wylh^vmeWytheville , \ \ ,. ) W I ' s r u s s «> 83' < /----- \"lebanor^ 81° V' ' v O . ■D V . - . / \ r M anon \ ' CD XVASH N6T0N ' 61® C/) T T V Abinpdon C/) Gate^City \ , . v - ,o 02® 83® r ~ E N' N II. Collection of Samples; During the summer of 1962, samples were collected in the Appalachian Valley in northwestern Virginia. Sites were chosen in Frederick, Clarke, and Shenandoah Counties where typical expo­ sures of the desired clastic Paleozoic sediments were to be found. At all locations, multiple samples of the formations were made with an effort to collect a representative set of samples based on grain size, color, mineral content, cementation, induration and structural position. Weverton Quartzite, -6wg, Lower Cambrian: The Weverton quartzite was named by Keith (1892, p. 365; 1893, p. 329; 1894) with a type section at Weverton, Maryland. It is described by Nickelsen (1956, p. 248) as three quartzite members with two intermediate phyllite members with thin quartzite inter­ beds. It is light gray to dark gray to vitreous bluish-black in the quartzite members. The upper member is poorly sorted with much cross bedding while the lower member is the best sorted with only local small-scale cross bedding. Samples were taken along a .3 mile stretch east from the horseshoe curve at Snickers Gap on Rt. 7. Approaching this location from the east, the Weverton exposure begins about 1.4 mile after the first road to Bluemont. Antietam Quartzite, -fia. Lower Cambrian: The Antietam quartzite was named by Keith (1893, p. 335) and Williams and Clark (1893, p. 68). The type section is Antietam Creek, Maryland. The Antietam consists of light gray to medium gray and light tan, fine to very fine grained massive quartzite. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Some beds darker and more poorly sorted are described as sericitic quartzite or silty phyllite by Nickelsen (1956, p. 251). Outcrops were sampled starting 3.4 miles west of the Bluemont Road on Rt. 7 and continuing down the hill for several hundred feet toward the Shenandoah River. Conococheague Limestone,-€c, Upper Cambrian: The Conococheague limestone was named by Stose (1908, p. 701). The type section was from Conococheague Creek in Franklin County, Pennsylvania. Stose originally included the present Conococheague in the Knox formation and described the distinctive basal sand beds. The Conococheague consists of medium gray limestone, calcareous sandstone, dolomite and dolomitic siltstone. Oolites, limestone pebble conglomerates, and cryptozoon algae are present in this for­ mation in many places. The sandy beds in this formation were sampled approximately 3% miles west of Winchester, on Rt. 50, 1 mile east of the Little North Mountain Gap where the Conococheague is exposed in a road cut through an orchard. Martinsburg, Omb, Ordovician: The Martinsburg shale was named by Geiger & Keith (1891) for a belt of shale east of Martinsburg, West Virginia. The Martinsburg consists of nearly black, chippy, fissile shale, medium brown siltstones and various gray graywackes, with lesser low grade slates, thin limestones, dolomite, chert, and conglomerates. Weathering in many cases produces a yellow-brown hue. Samples were first taken 1.8 mile west of Opequon Creek on Rt. 7 east of Winchester. Additional samples were taken at exposures in readouts east of Winchester and south of Winchester on Rt. 522. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Tuscarora, Stc, Silurian: The Tuscarora was named by Darton in 1896 (Darton and Taff, 1896; Darton, 1896) from Tuscarora Mountain, Pennsylvania. The Tuscarora is a very fine to medium grained quartzite. The degree of diagenesis varies so that a few layers are nearly friable and others massive. All samples, though, had at least some grains that show typical quartzitic
Recommended publications
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX
    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Trilobites from National Park Service Areas
    Sullivan, R.M. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Fossil Record 5. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 74. 179 AN INVENTORY OF TRILOBITES FROM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE AREAS MEGAN R. NORR¹, VINCENT L. SANTUCCI1 and JUSTIN S. TWEET2 1National Park Service. 1201 Eye Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20005; -email: [email protected]; 2Tweet Paleo-Consulting. 9149 79th St. S. Cottage Grove. MN 55016; Abstract—Trilobites represent an extinct group of Paleozoic marine invertebrate fossils that have great scientific interest and public appeal. Trilobites exhibit wide taxonomic diversity and are contained within nine orders of the Class Trilobita. A wealth of scientific literature exists regarding trilobites, their morphology, biostratigraphy, indicators of paleoenvironments, behavior, and other research themes. An inventory of National Park Service areas reveals that fossilized remains of trilobites are documented from within at least 33 NPS units, including Death Valley National Park, Grand Canyon National Park, Yellowstone National Park, and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve. More than 120 trilobite hototype specimens are known from National Park Service areas. INTRODUCTION Of the 262 National Park Service areas identified with paleontological resources, 33 of those units have documented trilobite fossils (Fig. 1). More than 120 holotype specimens of trilobites have been found within National Park Service (NPS) units. Once thriving during the Paleozoic Era (between ~520 and 250 million years ago) and becoming extinct at the end of the Permian Period, trilobites were prone to fossilization due to their hard exoskeletons and the sedimentary marine environments they inhabited. While parks such as Death Valley National Park and Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve have reported a great abundance of fossilized trilobites, many other national parks also contain a diverse trilobite fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Tax Districts Containing Karst Terrain
    Hancock Brooke WWeesstt VViirrggiinniiaa TTaaxx DDiissttrriiccttss Ohio ¨¦§70 CCoonnttaaiinniinngg KKaarrsstt TTeerrrraaiinn 40° 40° Publications Policy: Marshall This publication represents interpretations of best available data made by professional geologists. -80° As in all research work, professional interpretations may vary, and can change with advancements in # -78° both technology and data quality. This publication Monongalia # ¨¦§68 # is offered as a service of the State of West Virginia; -81° Wetzel ## ## # # proper use of the information herein is the sole µ ## responsibility of the user. # # # ## # # ### Marion Preston -79° Morgan # # ¨¦§81# Permission to reproduce this publication is granted Tyler # # # # # # Berkeley # if acknowledgement is given to the West Virginia # # # Geological and Economic Survey. # # # # ## Pleasants Taylor # # Jefferson Harrison # Mineral # ## ## Hamps#hire ## Doddridge ¨¦§79 # # # # Wood # ## # -78° Ritchie # # Barbour # Tu#cker # # # -82° ## # # # # Wirt # #### Grant# # Lewis #### # 39° 39° # ## ## ### Hard#y Gilmer # # # # Upshur # ### ### # ### # # # # Jackson Calhoun # ## # ### # ## # ¨¦§77 Randolp#h # # ## ### # # -79° ## Mason Roane Braxton # # # # # # # # # ### Pendle#t#on # # #### # ##### Putnam # # # ## Webster # # # Clay # # # ## # Cabell ## ## ¨¦§64 # # ## ##### # Pocaho#ntas Kanawha ## ^_ Nicholas # ### Charleston ### ## # Lincoln ##### Legend ##### Wayne ###### ###### # ##### Known Caverns #### Boone Fayette ### # #### # 38° Gr#e#enb#r#ier 38° 77 # #### Avis Limestone Outcrop ¨¦§ #####
    [Show full text]
  • Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992
    Guidebook for the llth Annual Field Trip of the Harrisburg Area Geological Society May 9, 1992 Paleozoic Geology of the Paw Paw-Hancock Area of Maryland and West Virginia by Marcus M. Key, Jr. and Noel Potter, Jr. Dickinson College TABLE OF CONTENTS . .. List of F1gures . .............................................. 111 Introduction . ....................................... · ......... 1 Road Log • ..•... • ..... · .... • •.....•....•...•......• e ••• '0 ••••••••• 3 Stop 1. Roundtop Hill . ............ o •••••••••• o •••••••••••••••••• 5 stop 2. Sideling Hill Road Cut ..•.••............••.••••......... 8 Stop 3. Sideling Hill Diamictite Exposure ....•.•....•.•....•... 11 Stop 4. Cacapon Mountain Overlook .••.......•......•.•••••...... 15 Stop 5. Fluted Rocks Overlook .•..•••.••....•.•.•••.•........... 16 Stop 6. Fluted Rocks ................. .,. .......... ., o ••••• ., •••••• • 19 Stop 7. Berkeley Springs state Park •...•.....................•. 20 Acknowled·gments . ........................... :- ... e ••••••••••••••• 21 References .....••.•..•.•••.•..•.•..•.••......................•. 2 2 Topogrpphic maps covering field trip stops: USGS 7 1/2 minute quadrangles Bellegrove (MD-PA-WV), Great Cacapon (WV-MD), Hancock (WV-MD-PA) Cover Photo: Anticline in Silurian Bloomsburg Formation. From Stose and swartz (1912). The anticline is visible from the towpath of the c & 0 Canal at Roundtop Hill (Stop# 1). Guidebook copies may be obtained by writing: Harrisburg Area Geological Society cjo Pennsylvania Geological Survey P.O. Box 2357 Harrisburg,
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Elkton Area Virginia
    Geology of the Elkton area Virginia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 230 Geology of the Elkton area Virginia By PHILIP B. KING GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 230 A detailed report on an area containing interesting problems of stratigraphy', structure, geomorphology, and economic geology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1950 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price $1.75 (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-- _ ________________________________________ 1 Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction. ______________________________________ 1 Cambrian system—Continued Previous work. _ ____________________________________ 2 Elbrook dolomite.________-_____._--_-__-__. 32 Present work. ______________________________________ 3 Name._ _____________-_-_-____---_____- 32 Acknowledgments. _________________________________ 3 Outcrop.____-___-------_--___----.-___ 32 Geography.. _ ______________________________________ 4 Character, _____________________________ 32 Stratigraphy _______________________________________ 6 Age_.____-_..-__-_---_--___------_-_._ 32 Pre-Cambrian rocks__ . __________________________ 7 Residuum of Elbrook dolomite ___________ 33 Injection complex. __________________________ 8 Stratigraphic relations-__________________ 33 Name. _ ----_-______----________-_-_-__ 8 Conococheague limestone.___________________ 33 Outcrop. ______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report
    ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE, LLC ATLANTIC COAST PIPELINE and DOMINION ENERGY TRANSMISSION, INC. SUPPLY HEADER PROJECT Implementation Plan EC26 Attachment 1 Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia August 30, 2017 19955 Highland Vista Drive, Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 703-726-8030 19955 Highland Vista Dr., Suite 170 Ashburn, Virginia 20147 (703) 726-8030 www.geoconcepts-eng.com August 30, 2017 Colin Olness, PE Contractor Atlantic Coast Pipeline - Construction 99 Edmiston Way Buckhannon, WV 26201 Subject: Fracture Analysis and Dye Trace Report Dominion ACP, Augusta, Bath and Highland Counties, Virginia & Pocahontas and Randolph Counties, West Virginia (GeoConcepts Project No. 11002.04) Dear Mr. Olness: GeoConcepts Engineering, Inc. (GeoConcepts) is pleased to present this fracture analysis and existing dye trace report for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Sincerely, GEOCONCEPTS ENGINEERING, INC. Joshua D. Valentino, PhD Robert K. Denton Jr., CPG, LPSS Senior Staff Geologist Senior Geologist [email protected] [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope of Services ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ¥..Aster of Science Approved
    GEOLOGY 0 F THE ADWOLF-THOMAS ' BRIDGE AREA, VIRGINIA by L'. J. Aiken Thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty· of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute in candidacy for the degree of ¥..ASTER OF SCIENCE • in Gc:e;ology APPROVED: L_,/ -------------R. V. Dietrich G;. G. Ti llma..-i June, 1967 Blacksburg, Virginia i. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction l Location. 1 Purpose of the Investigation. 1 Method of Investigation .• .. 1 Previous Work •. 2 Acknowledgments .. 2 Drainage and Relief '. 2 Topography. 3 Stratigraphy ... 4 General Statement 4 Description of the Rocks. 6 Erwin Formation. '. 6 Name and age·. 6 Distribution and thicknes.s. .• . 6 Lithology 6 Fossils . 7 Shady Dolomite .. 9 Name and age •. .' 9 Distribution and thickness. 9 Lithology .. 10 Rome Formation 11 N'al]le and age. 11 ·nistribution and thickness. 11 Lithology 12 ii. Page Elbrook Dolomite 12 Name and age. 12 Distribution and thickness. 12 Lithology 12 Conococheague Limestone. 15 Na.tile and age. 15 Distribution and thickness. 15 Lithology 15 Knox Dolomite. 17 Name and age. 17 Distribution and thickness. 17 Lithology 17 Erosional Unconformity at the Top of the Knox Dolamite Group 18 Tumbez Formation 18 Name and age. 18 Distribution and thickness. 18 Lithology 19 Mosheim Formation. 19 Ne.me and age. 19 Distribution and thickness. 19 Lithology 20 Giesler Limestone. 20 N rune and age • 20 Distribution and thickness. 20 Lithology •' 20 iii. Page Arline Limestone • .. 20 Name and age. 20 Distribution and thickness. Lithology • .. /21~ Rich Valley Formation. 21 Name and age. .... 21 Distribution and thickness. 21 Lithology • 22 Structural Geology 22 Structures in the Saltville Block • 22 McMullin Syncline.
    [Show full text]
  • County-Wide Groundwater Assessment Jefferson County, West
    County-Wide Groundwater Assessment Jefferson County, West Virginia Prepared for Jefferson County Commission 124 E. Washington Street Charles Town, West Virginia 25414 Prepared on: April 2, 2012 Michael Maloy, CPG Senior Geologist, Principal Andrew Carter Senior Environmental Scientist Analytical Services, Incorporated 402 N West Street Culpeper, Virginia 22701 Table of Contents 1.0 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Jefferson County Geology and Groundwater ...................................................................... 1 2.1 Geologic Setting ............................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Geologic and Geomorphic Features that Affect Groundwater ......................................... 2 3.0 Hydrogeologic Units ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Western Fault-Dominated “Western Unit” ..................................................................... 3 3.2 Central Valley - Folded Carbonates “Central Unit”........................................................ 4 3.3 Eastern Metamorphic “Eastern Unit” .............................................................................. 5 4.0 Groundwater Resource Features .......................................................................................... 6 4.1 Fracture Trace Analysis ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of Frederick County
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner ol Mineral Resources and State Geologisl CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGINIA | 966 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY Charles Butts and "'"Raymond S. Edmundson BULLETIN 80 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES James L. Calver Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA I 966 Couuorwnlr-trr or VnctNrl Dnp,llruBxt oF PuRctrAsEs eto Suppr-v Rrcrrruorqo 1966 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia MenvrN M. Surrronr,ltNo, Director A. S. Recrrat, J*., Executiue Assistant BOARD Canr,rsr,e H. HunrBr,srNe, Williamsburg, Chairman ANonnw A. Fenr,ov, Danville, Vice-Chairman Joe P. Gn Ls, Roanoke Ar,r,eN M. HBvwenp, Newport News Cr,euor A. Ju,ssue, Jn., Charlottesville Genraxo E. Moss, Chase City Ennu,sr L. Surrrr, Grundy JorrN S. TrronxroN, Culpeper Ancrrrr L. WENnrcH, Hopewell CONTENTS Pecr Abstract 1 qrannage . 5 5 6 9 .'..'....',....'..',.',......''..'.'..'...'.'..'....,....-'.....'..'.......'.....'.'.....'..'.''..'.-.'.',.. l ? 12 o1 2r 24 26 28 Lincolnshire formation ,o r{unourgEdinburg rormatlonformation --. ... ... ....... ......... ......... .. .................. 30 Oranda formation ................
    [Show full text]