DOCSLIB.ORG

Considerations, Best Practices and Requirements for a Virtualised Mobile Network CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES and REQUIREMENTS for a VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Considerations, Best Practices and Requirements for a Virtualised Mobile Network CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES and REQUIREMENTS for a VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK Considerations, Best Practices and Requirements for a Virtualised Mobile Network CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK About the GSMA Network 2020 Contents The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators The GSMA’s Future Networks Programme is designed to worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with almost 300 help operators and the wider mobile industry to deliver all-IP companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset networks so that everyone benefits regardless of where their and device makers, software companies, equipment providers starting point might be on the journey. and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces industry-leading The programme has three key work-streams focused on: events such as Mobile World Congress, Mobile World Congress The development and deployment of IP services, The 5.1.4 NFV carrier-grade reliability scope 24 Shanghai, Mobile World Congress Americas and the Mobile 360 evolution of the 4G networks in widespread use today, 1 Introduction 3 Series of conferences. The 5G Journey developing the next generation of mobile 1.1 Scope 4 5.2 Carrier Grade Service – Requirements 26 technologies and service. 1.2 Definitions 4 for NFV Reliability For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA. For more information, please visit the Network 2020 website 1.3 Abbreviations 5 5.3 NFV Reliability Assessment Standard 26 at: www.gsma.com/network2020 1.4 References 6 5.4 Best Practices 28 5.4.1 Use case scenarios 28 2 NFV reference architecture 7 5.5 Conclusion 29 3 Requirements for Network Orchestrators 9 6 Migration 31 3.1 Introduction 10 6.1 Introduction 32 3.1.1 Network Services 10 6.1.1 Migration from physical network to 32 3.1.2 Virtualised Network Functions 11 virtualised network 3.1.3 Network Functions Virtualisation 11 6.1.2 Software upgrades 32 With thanks to contributors: Infrastructure 6.1.3 Interoperability 32 AT&T 3.2 NFV Orchestrator functional requirements 11 6.2 Best practices 32 China Mobile China Telecom 3.3 Other NFV related architectures 12 6.2.1 Migration 32 China Unicom 3.4 Best Practices 14 6.2.2 Software upgrades 33 KDDI 3.4.1 Planning on NFV based network 14 KT 6.3 Requirements 34 LG Uplus management and orchestration 6.3.1 Migration 34 architecture NTT DoCoMo 6.3.2 Software upgrades 34 Orange 3.4.2 Example of 5G Telco-MANO architecture 15 Proximus America Movil 7 Performance benchmark for NFV 35 4 Virtualised network security 17 SK Telecom infrastructure Telecom Italia 4.1 Introduction 18 7.1 Performance benchmark scope 36 Telefónica 4.1.1 Maturity 18 Telekom Austria 7.2 State of the art in NFV performance 37 Telenor Group 4.2 Architectural Challenges 18 benchmarking TeliaSonera 4.3 Best practices 19 T-Mobile US 4.4 Conclusions 19 8 Vertical interoperability 41 United States Cellular 8.1 Introduction 42 Vodafone 4.5 Actions 19 Ascom Network Testing 8.2 Requirements for vertical interoperability 42 Cisco 5 Carrier grade NFV/ Reliability 21 8.3 Challenges and potential risks 42 Ericsson 5.1 Introduction 22 Gemalto 8.4 Best Practices 43 HP 5.1.1 Carrier-grade 22 Huawei 5.1.2 The essential value of carrier-grade 22 Nokia reliability Oracle America Samsung Electronics 5.1.3 NFV carrier-grade reliability challenges 23 ZTE CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK 1 Introduction 2 3 CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK CONSIDERATIONS, BEST PRACTICES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR A VIRTUALISED MOBILE NETWORK 1.1 Scope 1.2 Those are Definitions Resource orchestration Subset of Network Functions ETSI European Telecommunications Virtualisation Orchestrator Standards Institute This document outlines the key considerations in Term Description functions that are responsible ETSI GS ETSI Group Specification the deployment of network virtualisation in a mobile Lifecycle management Set of functions required to for global resource management network environment. The topics covered within manage the instantiation, governance FCAPS Fault, Configuration, Accounting, maintenance and termination of a Performance and Security represent solutions to the potential obstacles mobile Service lifecycle Set of phases for realizing a Virtualised Network Function or service from conception and GS-O Global Service Orchestration operators may face when wishing to capitalize on Network Service identification to instantiation and ICT Information and Communications network virtualisation (covering both Network Functions Network controller Functional block that centralizes retirement Technology Virtualisation and Software-Defined Networking). some or all of the control and Software-Defined Networking A set of techniques that enables management functionality of a IoT Internet of Things to directly program, orchestrate, network domain and may provide This document provides an overview of the steps control and manage network IPC Instructions Per Cycle an abstract view of its domain to resources, which facilitates the mobile operators should take to adopt this technology other functional blocks via well- iTLB/dTLB instruction Translation Lookaside design, delivery and operation and where appropriate, provide an indication of defined interfaces Buffer / data Translation of network services in a dynamic Lookaside Buffer what they will need to complete the work and which Network Function Functional block within a and scalable manner network infrastructure that has ISB Industry Standard Benchmarking external organisations are best placed to deliver it. SDN Orchestration A process that oversees and well-defined external interfaces directs a set of software-defined ISG Industry Specification Group and well-defined functional The document also outlines a number of examples networking activities and behaviour KPI Key Performance Indicator and approaches that have been taken by operators interactions with the objective of Network Functions Principle of separating Network carrying out certain work in an KVM Kernel-Based Virtual Machine to identify and address the gaps. These best practice automated manner. Virtualisation Functions from the hardware L1/L2/LLC Level 1/Level 2/ Last Level Cache examples are provided as guidance and do not they run on by using virtual Virtualised Infrastructure Functional block that is hardware abstraction Open-O Open Orchestrator Project represent the consensus of the GSMA members Manager responsible for controlling and participating to this activity. Network Functions Functional block that manages managing the Network Functions OPEX Operating Expense Virtualisation Infrastructure Virtualisation Orchestrator the Network Service lifecycle OPNFV Open Platform for NFV and coordinates the management compute, storage and network of Network Service lifecycle, resources, usually within one OS Operating System Virtualised Network Function operator’s Infrastructure Domain OSM Open Source MANO project lifecycle and NFV infrastructure Virtualised Network Function Implementation of an Network to ensure an optimized allocation OSS Operations Support Systems Function that can be deployed on of the necessary resources and a Network Function Virtualisation OVS Open vSwitch connectivity Infrastructure PGW Packet Data Network Gateway Network Functions Totality of all hardware and Virtualised Network Function Internal component of a Virtualisation Infrastructure software components that build PNF Physical Network Function Component Virtualised Network Function up the environment in which providing a defined sub-set RAN Radio Access Node Virtualised Network Functions of that Virtualised Network are deployed RFC Request For Comments Function’s functionality. Network service orchestration Subset of Network Functions MANO Management and Orchestration Virtualisation Orchestrator MME Mobility Management Entity functions that are responsible 1.3 Abbreviations for Network Service lifecycle MVNO Mobile Virtual Network Operator management Term Description NextGen Next Generation API Application Programming Network service descriptor Template that describes the NF Network Function deployment of a Network Service Interface NFV Network Functions Virtualisation including service topology ATIS The Alliance for as well as Network Service Telecommunication Industry NFV-O Network Functions Virtualisation characteristics such as Service Solutions Orchestrator Layer Agreements for the Network Service on-boarding BSS Business Support Systems NFVI Network Functions Virtualisation Infrastructure and lifecycle management of its CAPEX Capital Expenditure instances NOC Network Operations Centre CNI Critical Network Infrastructure Network Service Composition of Network NS Network Service Functions and defined by its CPU Central Processing Unit SDN Software Defined Networking functional and behavioural DPDK Data Plane Development Kit specification SDN-O Software Defined Networking DUT Device Under Test Orchestration Type of composition where one Orchestration ECOMP Enhanced Control, Orchestration, particular element is used by SHV Standard High Volume the composition to oversee and Management & Policy SGW Serving Gateway direct the other elements EOSL End of Service Life UMO Unified Management and Quota Upper limit on specific types of EPC Evolved Packet Core resources Orchestration EM Element Management vACL virtual
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary See Also
    Glossary See also: SDN-R Glossary Definitions AAF: Application Authorization Framework fine-grained authorization library and service; one of the ONAP Common Services AAI = A&AI: Active and Available Inventory (component of ONAP runtime) Real-time views of Resources, Services, Products, Customer Subscriptions, and their relationships AID: Architecture Integration Document Akka: handles clustering (used OpenDaylight controllers) akka.io AJSC: see JSC Amsterdam: Code name for the first release of ONAP APPC (formerly APP-C): Application Controller (part of ONAP) handles the life cycle management of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) Beijing: Code name for the second release of ONAP BPEL: Business Process Execution Language (OASIS Standard) XML-based language that allows Web services in a service-oriented architecture (SOA) to interconnect and share data. BPMN: Business Process Model and Notation (Wikipedia) or Business Process Management Notation (ONAP.pdf) graphical representation for specifying business processes BRMS: Business Rules Management System BSS: Business Support System CCSDK: Common Controller SDK project Code shared across controllers (e.g. SDNC, APP-C) CDAP: Cask Data Application Platform open source framework to build and deploy data applications on Apache™ Hadoop® (CDAP.io site) CDS: Controller Design Studio it is not the tool for the design of controllers instead it is common design tool to support both SDNC and generic L4-7 NF controllers integrated with SDC (e.g. APPC, VFC) part of CCSDK project, see vFW CDS Casablanca -
    [Show full text]
  • Software Defined Networking and Network Function Virtualization: Bridging the World of Virtual Networks
    Software Defined Networking and Network Function Virtualization: bridging the world of virtual networks Roberto Morabito Department of Communications and Networking (Comnet), Aalto University, Espoo, Finland [email protected] Abstract— Software Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) are two emerging and complementary concepts that can be considered as key players in the virtual networks world. In particular, SDN allows managing different network services through abstraction of higher-level functionality, while NFV leverages the use of virtualization technologies to virtualize specific network functions. Although SDN and NFV are considered stand-alone technologies, they are often put in relationship, because their connections, and overlapped use cases. In this paper, we present a short survey providing an overview of the two different models, highlighting the complementarities, together with the standardization activities and the open source community efforts to make these two paradigms connected to each other. Keywords—Software Defined Networking; SDN; Network Function Virtualization; NFV; I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1. SDN architecture [4] [INTRODUCTION] à [1,2,3] The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we summarize general background information B. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) about Software Defined Networking (SDN), and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). Section III clarifies the distinctions between SDN and NFV, however emphasizing [6], [7] point of contact and common use cases. In Section IV, a quick overview of ongoing standardization efforts is presented, together with the activities of the Open Source community in the virtual networks world. Section V concludes the paper providing final remarks. II. BACKGROUND In this section, we provide an overview of the different approaches, which are object of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • OPNFV: Open Source Software to Enable NFV
    OPNFV: Open Source Software to Enable NFV Ashiq Khan, PhD DOCOMO R&D TSC Member NTT DOCOMO, INC. Open Platform for NFV CLOUDOPEN Japan June 3, 2015 © 2015, NTT DOCOMO. INC. All Rights Reserved. 1 Contents Telco virtualization and NFV Why open source Open Platform for NFV © 2015, NTT DOCOMO. INC. All Rights Reserved. 2 Lesson learned … Mar 2011 Massive number of call attempts (roughly 60-fold increase) were made. Call restriction control were in place. Earthquake 14:46 Mar.11 Call Restriction Call Restriction 15:00, Mar. 11 – 2:00, Mar. 12 6:00, Mar.12 – 1:00, Mar. 13 <Massive Congestion> 12.6-fold The number of call attempts were increased roughly 60-fold in outgoing and 40-fold in incoming. The number of calls out in 7.9-fold out in After the A week disaster ago Friday, Mar.11 Saturday, Mar.12 source: http://www.soumu.go.jp/menu_news/s-news/01kiban02_02000043.html Deploying resources to process such load is practically impossible © 2015, NTT DOCOMO. INC. All Rights Reserved. 3 Enter virtualization We need a mean to do resource sharing Normal At disaster More on highly demanded More on voice calls etc. to Internet access (Rich media confirm safety of relatives Contents) than voice calls and friends Voice Mail Rich Media (Video etc.) This is a joint research work supported by "Experimental challenges for dynamic virtualized networking resource control over an evolved mobile core network - a new approach to reduce massive traffic congestion after a devastating disaster" of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Mega NFV Report Pt. 1: MANO and NFVI
    Market Report 2016 Mega NFV Report Pt. 1: MANO and NFVI The Trusted News and Resource Site for SDx, SDN, NFV, Cloud and Virtualization Infrastructure Market Report | 2016 Mega NFV Report Pt. 1: MANO and NFVI contents Table of Contents Introduction – NFV Platforms Grow Up . 1 Investment Benefits of NFV in NFVI and MANO . 3 NFV Architecture . 5 NFV Market Landscape . 11 NFV MANO Products. 16 NFVI Products . 16 NFV Monitoring and Testing Products . 17 Vendor Profiles . 18 MANO and NFVI Products [Featured] Brocade: Brocade SDN Controller . 21 Brocade: Brocade Vyatta Network OS . 22 Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco NFV Infrastructure . 23 Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco Network Services Orchestrator (NSO) enabled by Tail-f . 23 Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco Virtual Topology System (VTS) . 23 Cisco Systems, Inc.: Cisco Elastic Services Controller (ESC) . 23 Juniper Networks, Inc.: Juniper Networks Contrail . 24 Wind River: Titanium Server . .26 MANO ADVA Optical Networking: Ensemble Orchestrator . 27 Affirmed Networks: Affirmed Mobile Content Cloud . 27 Amartus: Chameleon SDS . .27 Anuta Networks, Inc.: Anuta Network NCX . .28 ATTO Research: Athena . 28 Avaya Inc.: Avaya SDN Fx Architecture . 28 Brocade: Brocade VNF Manager . .29 Canonical: Ubuntu OpenStack . 29 CA Technologies: CA Virtual Network Assurance . 29 CENX, Inc: Exanova Service Intelligence . 30 Ciena: Ciena Blue Planet . .30 Ericsson Network Manager & Ericsson Cloud Manager . 30 Fujitsu: Network Virtuora OM and Virtuora RV . 31 Huawei: Huawei FusionSphere . 31 MRV Communications: MRV Pro-Vision . 31 Nakina Systems: NI-CONTROLLER . 32 Nakina Systems: NI-FRAMEWORK . .32 NEC/Netcracker: NEC/Netcracker Orchestration . 32 Nokia: CloudBand . 33 © 2016 SDNCentral LLC. All Rights Reserved. Page ii Market Report | 2016 Mega NFV Report Pt.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Guide January 2019
    Member Guide January 2019 www.lfnetworking.org Table of Contents Welcome to LF Networking 3 How to Engage 22 LF Networking Organizational Overview 4 Information for Board Members 23 The Role of the Linux Foundation 6 Marketing Advisory Council (MAC) 24 Your Staff Contacts 7 Technical Advisory Council (TAC) 26 Project Technical Steering 28 Introduction to LF Networking 9 Committees (TSCs) Projects Technical Onboarding 29 FD.io 10 Other Ways to Engage 35 ONAP 11 End User Advisory Groups (EUAGs) 35 OpenDaylight 12 Academic Outreach and Internships 35 OPNFV 13 OSN User Groups 35 PNDA 14 SNAS 15 Tungsten Fabric 16 LFN Support Programs 17 Independent Market Education 18 Compliance and Verification Programs 19 Powered by OpenDaylight 19 OPNFV Verified 19 Training 21 LF Networking Member Guide CHAPTER ONE Welcome to LF Networking Thank you for joining the LF Networking community as a member. Your support is vitally important in sustaining the health and innovative momentum of the LF Networking projects. We’ve written this guide to provide you a complete reference to the LF Networking community. You will learn how to engage with your communities of interest, all the different ways you can contribute, and how to get help when you need it. If you have suggestions for enhancing this guide, please get in touch with LFN staff or email [email protected]. LF Networking Organizational Overview Learn more about LF Networking here: LF Networking (LFN) is a consortium of open source networking projects hosted by the Linux Website Charter Wiki Foundation. The Linux Foundation provides staff members to help manage various operational aspects of these projects, but developing the code and sharing it with the world is in the hands of our passionate developers and other community members.
    [Show full text]
  • I Driver Globali Sul 5G
    2 notiziariotecnico anno 26 1/2017 3 volatilità del mercato finanziario, perché dunque attorno al 5G vi è I DRIVER GLOBALI così tanto interesse e discussione ? Come per tutti i libri di maggiore successo e fortuna nel tempo, il SUL 5G 5G si presta a letture molto diver- se ed ogni stakeholder può trovare Gabriele Elia, Pierpaolo Marchese nel 5G ragioni differenti e profonde di necessità e di sviluppo di questa nuova tecnologia che per le sue va- Introduzione ficilmente appariranno sul mercato con contenuti ultra broadband, e rie implicazioni ed aspettative tra- prima del 2020. Si sta addirittura lo stesso avverrà con le Olimpiadi scende il puro fatto tecnico. Di qui Nell’evoluzione della Industry TLC verificando anche una “competi- di Tokio del 2020 che saranno sicu- anche la varietà dei percorsi che, ed Informatica il 5G è sicuramente zione” tra macroregioni economi- ramente trasmesse a qualità video partendo anche da punti di vista e l’Hype del momento. Qualsiasi ri- che, gli USA, l’Asia e l’Europa. In 8K su reti 5G. aspettative differenti, convergono cerca su Google su “5G” restituisce Nord America AT&T e Verizon han- La Commissione Europea ha lan- verso il 5G. migliaia di riferimenti, ogni bollet- no deciso di anticipare al massimo ciano un piano chiamato 5G Action A nostro parere vari sono i drivers tino tecnico che quotidianamente i tempi, anche nei gruppi di stan- Plan [nota 1] per stimolare, facili- che guidano questi percorsi, ma al- riceviamo comprende almeno un dardizzazione, almeno per poter tare e armonizzare le iniziative in cuni si impongono più di altri: approfondimento 5G.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 組織名称 ( 略称 ) Open Platform for NFV (OPNFV)
    1 組織名称( 略称) Open Platform for NFV (OPNFV) https://www.opnfv.org/ 2 分類 活動目的 フォーラム標準化 対象分野 インフラ関連(ネットワ ーク) 技術MAP 活動エリア(注1) -2 活動技術（注2） -1 3 目 的 ・NFV機能を構築するために利用可能なオープンソースプラットフォームの開発 ・エンドユーザの参加によって、OPNFVがユーザニーズに合致することを確認 ・関連するオープンソースコンポーネント間の一貫性、相互運用性、性能を確認するこ とでNFV関連のオープンソースプロジェクトへの寄与 ・オープンスタンダード、ソフトウェアに基づいたNFVソリューションのためのエコシステ ムの確立 ・最適なオープンレファレンスプラットフォームとしてのNFVの普及促進 4 組織構成 ・Board : Board sets business direction and scope for the Project - Audit & Finance Committee : Financial oversight - IP & Legal Committee : Policy oversight - Marketing Committee : Oversight of all marketing; web, PR/AR, branding, etc - C & C Committee : Certification and compliance oversight - Strategic Planning Committee : Strategic direction oversight ・Technical Steering Committee (TSC):Sets technical direction for overall Project - Projects: Projects drive code development, testing, integration and reference platform release ・Board of Directors: Huawei, ARM, Red Hat, Cisco, IBM, China Mobile Research Institute, Ericsson, Canonical, Nokia, Telecom Italia Group, AT&T Labs, Juniper Networks, HP, Intel, NEC, Dell Research, ZTE, SUSE, Orange, Lenovo) Minimum 5 参加資格 Membership Board TSC Annual Fee FTE* Notes Level Seat Seat 会費 Requirement 2yr initial Platinum Flat fee: $200k 2 Yes Yes commitment, payable each year Platinum – 2yr initial Strategic End Flat fee: $100k 1 Yes Yes commitment, payable User each year > 5000 employees = $50K 500-4999 employees = $30K 1 per 10 Can be elected to the Silver 0 Silver No TSC as a community 100-499 employees = $20K members representative < 100 employees = $10K > 5000 employees = $25K 1 per 10 Silver – Can be elected to the 500-4999 employees = $15K Silver Strategic End 0 No TSC as a community 100-499 employees = $10K Strategic User representative < 100 employees = $5K End Users Associate (for non- Requires technical Can be elected to the ← No No TSC as a community profit/academic contributions to OPNFV representative institutions) * FTE = Full Time Engineer (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • 5G-PPP Vision on Software Networks
    White Paper – Software Networks WG Vision on Software Networks and 5G SN WG – January 2017 (final version 2.0) 1 White Paper – Software Networks WG Table of Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 NFV and SDN and 5G ............................................................................................................. 4 3 Terminology .......................................................................................................................... 5 4 Combining NFV and SDN: architectural trends and existing gaps ........................................ 7 4.1 Introduction: early steps combining NFV and SDN ....................................................... 7 4.2 An architecture proposal to integrate NFV and SDN for 5G ......................................... 9 4.3 Some examples of software network features and scenarios .................................... 10 4.3.1 Cloud RAN............................................................................................................ 10 4.3.2 Mobile Edge Computing ...................................................................................... 11 4.3.3 Multi-domain/Multi-provider Orchestration ...................................................... 13 4.3.4 Network Programmability ................................................................................... 16 4.3.5 Network slicing ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Bible
    The SDN, NFV & Network Virtualization Bible: 2015 – 2020 Opportunities, Challenges, Strategies & Forecasts Table of Contents 1 Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................... 20 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 20 1.2 Topics Covered .............................................................................................................................................. 22 1.3 Forecast Segmentation ................................................................................................................................. 23 1.4 Key Questions Answered ............................................................................................................................... 25 1.5 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................... 27 1.6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 28 1.7 Target Audience ............................................................................................................................................ 29 1.8 Companies & Organizations Mentioned ....................................................................................................... 30 2 Chapter 2: An Overview of SDN, NFV
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on NFV (Release 1.0) March 2016
    NFV INTERNATIONAL INTERCONNECTION FORUM FOR SERVICES OVER IP (i3 FORUM) (www.i3forum.org) Source: i3 forum keyword: NFV A Primer on NFV (Release 1.0) March 2016 This document provides the i3 forum’s perspective on NFV, focusing on the role of and the impact to international carriers. It does not intend to duplicate other existing specifications or documents on the same issue, but to complement these documents with the perspective of the international carrier members of i3 forum. “A Primer on NFV”, Release 1.0 – March 8, 2016 1 NFV Table of Contents 1. Scope and Objective of the Document ................................................................ 3 2. Acronyms ............................................................................................................ 4 3. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 3.1. What Is NFV? ................................................................................................... 5 3.2. What Has Enabled NFV? .................................................................................. 6 4. NFV Drivers ......................................................................................................... 7 5. NFV Market Data ................................................................................................. 8 5.1. Infonetics .......................................................................................................... 8 5.2. SDxCentral ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Survey of Network Function Virtualization
    Computer Networks 133 (2018) 212–262 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Computer Networks journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/comnet Review article A comprehensive survey of Network Function Virtualization ∗ Bo Yi a, Xingwei Wang b, , Keqin Li c, Sajal k. Das d, Min Huang e a College of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China b College of Software, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China c Department of Computer Science, State University of New York, New York 12561, USA d Department of Computer Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409, USA e College of Information Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Today’s networks are filled with a massive and ever-growing variety of network functions that coupled Received 13 April 2017 with proprietary devices, which leads to network ossification and difficulty in network management and Revised 15 January 2018 service provision. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a promising paradigm to change such situa- Accepted 17 January 2018 tion by decoupling network functions from the underlying dedicated hardware and realizing them in the form of software, which are referred to as Virtual Network Functions (VNFs). Such decoupling introduces Keywords: many benefits which include reduction of Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) and Operation Expense (OPEX), Network Function Virtualization improved flexibility of service provision, etc. In this paper, we intend to present a comprehensive survey Virtual network function on NFV, which starts from the introduction of NFV motivations.
    [Show full text]
  • NFV and OPNFV
    NFV and OPNFV Stanislav Guerassimov Betreuer: Edwin Cordeiro, Lukas Schwaighofer Seminar Innovative Internettechnologien und Mobilkommunikation SS2016 Lehrstuhl Netzarchitekturen und Netzdienste Fakultät für Informatik, Technische Universität München Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT along with existing OPNFV versions, projects and architec- The demand for flexible and economically viable cloud com- ture. The reader will become familiarized with theoretical puting and virtualization technologies is continuously in- concept designs for NFV, including NFV in the datacenter creasing. In this paper we discuss how Network Function and even in industrial automation systems in section 4, as Virtualization (NFV) enables simplified network function well as with existing industry implementations of NFV in management and other benefits and challenges that it brings. section 5. We also note major NFV standardization efforts, while de- scribing OPNFV in depth. Further, this paper introduces a couple of use-cases for NFV, such as deployment alongside 2. NFV SDN in a datacenter and even deployment in industrial au- Unlike server virtualization, network virtualization is not a tomation systems. We also provide a collection of analyses mature technology that is widely adapted. of existing pilot implementations of NFV. As a result, this paper should provide the reader with an up-to-date state of Network virtualization has the same goals as server virtual- network function virtualization technologies. ization. Analogous to those technologies, NFV should allow the network and it’s functions to appear to hosts as a real physical ones. This should allow network engineers to deploy Keywords previously physical networking devices as software applica- NFV OPNFV network function virtualization tions.
    [Show full text]