CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London SE8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London SE8 CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London SE8 London Borough of Lewisham Post-excavation assessment report and updated project design November 2013 © Museum of London Archaeology 2013 Museum of London Archaeology Mortimer Wheeler House 46 Eagle Wharf Road, London N1 7ED tel 020 7410 2200 | fax 020 410 2201 www.museumoflondonarchaeology.org.uk general enquiries: [email protected] DEPTFORD ROYAL DOCKYARD CONVOYS WHARF PRINCE STREET LONDON SE8 LONDON BOROUGH OF LEWISHAM Site Code CVF10 Post-excavation assessment report and updated project design Sign-off History: Issue No. Date: Prepared by: Checked/ Reason for Issue: Approved by: 1 25 March Antony Francis David Bowsher Draft for client review 2013 Project Manager 2 2 May 2013 Antony Francis David Bowsher Revised draft after client Project Manager comments 3 10 May 2013 Antony Francis David Bowsher Project Manager 4 29 October Antony Francis David Bowsher Revised draft after curator 2013 Project Manager comments 5 20 November Antony Francis David Bowsher Revised draft after curator 2013 Project Manager comments Author: Antony Francis Project Manager: David Bowsher Graphics: Carlos Lemos Museum of London Archaeology Mortimer Wheeler House, 46 Eagle Wharf Road, London N1 7ED tel 0207 410 2200 fax 0207 410 2201 email [email protected] Executive summary This report is intended to inform the reader of the results of the excavation at the site of Deptford Royal Dockyard at Convoys Wharf in Lewisham: what was found; what post-excavation assessment work has been done so far; what work still needs to be done and why; and how and where the results of the excavation should be made public. The report is written and structured in a particular way to conform with the standards required of post-excavation analysis work as set out in Management of Archaeological Projects (English Heritage, 1991). This report draws on and refines the results of excavations and earlier assessments, principally the Scheme of Archaeological Resource Management (SARM, Hawkins 2009), the Written Scheme of Investigation (Francis 2010b), previous evaluations (Divers 2000, Francis 2010a) and an interim publication (Hawkins et al 2013). The report describes the planning background and excavation history for the site (Section 1). The historical and archaeological background is contained in Section 2, and the archaeology discovered on site has been described in Section 4. In Section 5 the finds and environmental evidence is quantified and assessed. The dating evidence has been integrated with the stratigraphic data enabling the latter section to be set out in terms of the provisional periods represented on site. Sections 4 and 5 are the foundations from which Section 6, Potential of the Data has been developed. This potential is discussed in terms of how well the site can answer the original and additional research objectives (Section 7). There was no strong evidence for prehistoric settlement, although finds indicate that the site was used by prehistoric peoples. Geoarchaeological investigation was able to reconstruct in part the environment from the prehistoric period to the 19th century specifically in relation to a palaeochannel that crosses the site. The remains of a late 2nd century to 3rd century Roman enclosure with part of a skeleton in its fill (the only burial on site) were unexpected discoveries. A concentration of ex situ building material suggested that there may have been a Roman building on site. The Dockyard was founded in 1513 with the construction of a Storehouse (now a Scheduled Ancient Monument). A wide ditch nearby may have preceded this building. As the Dockyard developed through the Stuart period (1603–1714), a Dockyard Basin was constructed of timber, probably from a Tudor precursor for which some evidence survived. A narrow building was probably the Treasurer of the Navy’s House and the Dockyard perimeter wall was also identified. In the south of the site, walls relating to officers’ quarters and a smithy were revealed. Sayes Court was the home of the diarist and horticulturalist John Evelyn (1620– 1706). Traces of an early building were found below the ground plan of a probable 18th-century building on the site of Sayes Court. Garden walls could be more confidently reconciled with map evidence of Evelyn’s home, although no trace of his famous gardens was identified. The early Georgian period (1714–74) saw a major rebuilding of the Dockyard that expanded beyond its previous perimeter. The Tudor Storehouse was incorporated into a new, unified storehouse complex and the smithy was reconstructed. The Dockyard Basin largely rebuilt in this and the succeeding late Georgian to Victorian period (1774–1869). Ship building technology developed in the 18th and 19th centuries, until ultimately the slipways on the site became vast structures of brick, concrete and timber after 1844. Three such structures were excavated on the site CVF10 post-ex assessment report MOLA together with the foundations of their cover buildings, of which the Grade II listed Olympia building is an example, built in 1844–46. The Dockyard Basin gate and canal linking it to the river were replaced in stone and brick to a design by John Rennie (1761–1821). The Double Dock in the east of the site was rebuilt in 1839–41. The Dockyard declined from the mid-19th century and closed in 1869, becoming a cattle market a few years later. To date post-excavation work has identified the potential and significance (Sections 6 and 7) of the archive to add to the knowledge of this area of London, in the periods discussed above. This assessment describes how the information generated by the site could ultimately be integrated into detailed studies, along with documentary, cartographic and pictorial sources. Information from relevant sites in Britain and abroad can be tied in closely with evidence from specific periods on site. In order to achieve this, the stratigraphic, finds and environmental archive will be refined through analysis (Section 9). This will clarify the site sequence to help answer research questions (set out in Section 8.1). It is proposed that the results of the excavation are disseminated in three ways: through a MOLA monograph focussing on the post-medieval Dockyard; by a short article on the prehistoric and Roman discoveries; and via blogging / social media during the analysis and writing phases of these publications to build links with other researchers and interested parties (Section 8.2). Finally, the intention of the project is to create an archive that provides a sustainable framework for future research. To this end the archive will be placed in the London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC) adding to the significant body of data available there for further synthetic, integrated and thematic research. P:\LEWI\1047\na\Field\POST EX ASSESSMENT\Post-ex assessment report\Convoys Wharf post-ex assessment 20 November 2013.docx 3 CVF10 post-ex assessment report MOLA Contents 1 Introduction 12 1.1 Site location 12 1.2 The scope of the project 12 1.3 Circumstances and dates of fieldwork 12 1.3.1 Evaluations 2000 and 2010 13 1.3.2 Excavation 2011–2012 13 1.4 Organisation of the report 14 2 Historical and archaeological background 16 2.1 Geology and topography 16 2.2 Prehistoric 16 2.3 Roman 16 2.4 Saxon 16 2.5 Medieval 16 2.6 Post-medieval 18 2.6.1 Sixteenth century 18 2.6.2 Seventeenth century 20 2.6.3 Eighteenth century 23 2.6.4 Nineteenth century 24 2.6.5 Twentieth century 25 3 Original research aims 26 1.1 Site specific objectives and research aims 26 1.1.1 Site-wide 26 1.1.2 Sayes Court 26 1.1.3 Royal Naval Dockyard 26 4 Site sequence: interim statement on field work 28 4.1 Introduction 28 4.2 Natural and topography 28 4.3 Pre-dockyard (450,000BC–AD1513) 28 4.4 Tudor dockyard (1513–1603) 30 4.5 Stuart dockyard (1603–1714) 31 4.6 Sayes Court 33 4.7 Early Georgian dockyard (1714–1774) 35 4.8 Late Georgian to Victorian dockyard (1774–1869) 37 4.9 Post-dockyard (1869–present) 41 5 Quantification and assessment 44 5.1 Post-excavation review 44 P:\LEWI\1047\na\Field\POST EX ASSESSMENT\Post-ex assessment report\Convoys Wharf post-ex assessment 20 November 2013.docx 4 CVF10 post-ex assessment report MOLA 5.2 The site archive and assessment: stratigraphic 44 5.3 The site archive and assessment: finds and environmental 44 5.4 Geoarchaeology 45 5.4.1 Geoarchaeological methodology 45 5.4.2 Geoarchaeological background 46 5.4.3 Geoarchaeological sediments 49 5.4.4 Borehole logs 52 5.4.5 Subsamples for palaeoenvironmental assessment 57 5.4.6 Diatoms 57 5.4.7 Results and discussion 58 5.4.8 Conclusions 59 5.4.9 Ostracods 59 5.4.10 Pollen 61 5.4.11 Insects 65 5.4.12 Optically stimulated luminescence dating 67 5.4.13 Radiocarbon dating 68 5.4.14 Geoarchaeological discussion 70 5.5 The archaeological woodwork 75 5.5.1 Introduction 76 1.1.4 Methodology 78 5.5.2 Medieval woodwork 78 5.5.3 Post-medieval woodwork 78 5.5.4 Post-medieval woodworking tools and sampled debris deposits 87 5.6 Tree-ring spot dates 87 5.6.1 Methodology 88 5.6.2 Results 89 5.7 The building material 93 5.7.1 Introduction/methodology 93 5.7.2 Roman daub 93 5.7.3 Roman ceramic building material 94 5.7.4 Saxon building material 94 5.7.5 Medieval ceramic building material 94 5.7.6 Post-medieval stone building material 95 5.7.7 Post-medieval ceramic building material 96 5.7.8 Post-medieval plaster 99 5.8 The Roman pottery 101 5.9 The medieval and post medieval pottery 103 P:\LEWI\1047\na\Field\POST EX ASSESSMENT\Post-ex assessment report\Convoys Wharf
Recommended publications
  • CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London
    CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London SE8 London Borough of Lewisham Evaluation report April 2010 CONVOYS WHARF Prince Street London SE8 London Borough of Lewisham Evaluation report Site Code: CVF10 National Grid Reference: 537000 178200 Project Manager Robin Nielsen Author Antony Francis Graphics JuanJose Fuldain Judit Peresztegi Maggi Cox Louise Davies Museum of London Archaeology © Museum of London 2010 Mortimer Wheeler House, 46 Eagle Wharf Road, London N1 7ED tel 020 7410 2200 fax 020 7410 2201 [email protected] www.musemoflondonarchaeology.org.uk CVF10 Evaluation report MOLA Summary (non-technical) This report presents the results of an archaeological evaluation carried out by Museum of London Archaeology (MOLA) on the site of Convoys Wharf, Deptford London. The report was commissioned from MOLA by Convoys Investment S.A.R.L.. Following the recommendations of the archaeological consultant CgMs in consultation with the London Borough of Lewisham and English Heritage, 52 evaluation trenches were excavated. Boreholes and trial pits excavated by a geotechnical contractor were also monitored. The results of the field evaluation have helped to refine the initial assessment of the archaeological potential of the site. Three main areas have been identified as particularly important: the area of the Great Dock near the east boundary of the site; the footprint of the Grade II listed Olympia building where the evaluation demonstrated that stone slipways survive; and the area of the early 16th century Tudor storehouse, a scheduled ancient monument. Other structures identified during the evaluation included: the large mast pond and the small mast pond in the west of the site; the dockyard basin; multiphase buildings; the remains of the 18th century dockyard wall; and other slipways.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Update
    Residential update UK Residential Research | January 2018 South East London has benefitted from a significant facelift in recent years. A number of regeneration projects, including the redevelopment of ex-council estates, has not only transformed the local area, but has attracted in other developers. More affordable pricing compared with many other locations in London has also played its part. The prospects for South East London are bright, with plenty of residential developments raising the bar even further whilst also providing a more diverse choice for residents. Regeneration catalyst Pricing attraction Facelift boosts outlook South East London is a hive of residential Pricing has been critical in the residential The outlook for South East London is development activity. Almost 5,000 revolution in South East London. also bright. new private residential units are under Indeed pricing is so competitive relative While several of the major regeneration construction. There are also over 29,000 to many other parts of the capital, projects are completed or nearly private units in the planning pipeline or especially compared with north of the river, completed there are still others to come. unbuilt in existing developments, making it has meant that the residential product For example, Convoys Wharf has the it one of London’s most active residential developed has appealed to both residents potential to deliver around 3,500 homes development regions. within the area as well as people from and British Land plan to develop a similar Large regeneration projects are playing further afield. number at Canada Water. a key role in the delivery of much needed The competitively-priced Lewisham is But given the facelift that has already housing but are also vital in the uprating a prime example of where people have taken place and the enhanced perception and gentrification of many parts of moved within South East London to a more of South East London as a desirable and South East London.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Dockyards Society
    20TH CENTURY NAVAL DOCKYARDS: DEVONPORT AND PORTSMOUTH CHARACTERISATION REPORT Naval Dockyards Society Devonport Dockyard Portsmouth Dockyard Title page picture acknowledgements Top left: Devonport HM Dockyard 1951 (TNA, WORK 69/19), courtesy The National Archives. Top right: J270/09/64. Photograph of Outmuster at Portsmouth Unicorn Gate (23 Oct 1964). Reproduced by permission of Historic England. Bottom left: Devonport NAAFI (TNA, CM 20/80 September 1979), courtesy The National Archives. Bottom right: Portsmouth Round Tower (1843–48, 1868, 3/262) from the north, with the adjoining rich red brick Offices (1979, 3/261). A. Coats 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the MoD. Commissioned by The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England of 1 Waterhouse Square, 138-142 Holborn, London, EC1N 2ST, ‘English Heritage’, known after 1 April 2015 as Historic England. Part of the NATIONAL HERITAGE PROTECTION COMMISSIONS PROGRAMME PROJECT NAME: 20th Century Naval Dockyards Devonport and Portsmouth (4A3.203) Project Number 6265 dated 7 December 2012 Fund Name: ARCH Contractor: 9865 Naval Dockyards Society, 44 Lindley Avenue, Southsea, PO4 9NU Jonathan Coad Project adviser Dr Ann Coats Editor, project manager and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Davies Editor and reviewer, project executive and Portsmouth researcher Dr David Evans Devonport researcher David Jenkins Project finance officer Professor Ray Riley Portsmouth researcher Sponsored by the National Museum of the Royal Navy Published by The Naval Dockyards Society 44 Lindley Avenue, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 9NU, England navaldockyards.org First published 2015 Copyright © The Naval Dockyards Society 2015 The Contractor grants to English Heritage a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, perpetual, irrevocable and royalty-free licence to use, copy, reproduce, adapt, modify, enhance, create derivative works and/or commercially exploit the Materials for any purpose required by Historic England.
    [Show full text]
  • WARFARE OFFICERS CAREER HANDBOOK II Warfare Officers Career Handbook
    WARFARE OFFICERS CAREER HANDBOOK II WARFARE OFFICERS CAREER HANDBooK Warfare O fficers C areer H andbook IV WARFARE OFFICERS CAREER HANDBooK Foreword The Warfare Officers Career Handbook provides information for members of the Royal Australian Navy’s Warfare community. For the purposes of this handbook, the Warfare community is deemed to include all officers of the Seaman, Pilot and Observer Primary Qualifications. The Warfare Officer Community symbiotically contains personnel from the seaman, Submarine, Aviation, Hydrographic and Meteorological, Mine Clearance Diving and Naval Communications and Intelligence groups. The Warfare Officers Career Handbook is a source document for Warfare Officers to consult as they progress through their careers. It is intended to inform and stimulate consideration of career issues and to provide a coherent guide that articulates Navy’s requirements and expectations. The book provides a summary of the Warfare branch specialisations and the sub-specialisations that are embedded within them, leading in due course to entry into the Charge Program and the Command opportunities that follow. The Warfare Officers Career Handbook also describes the historical derivation of current warfare streams to provide contemporary relevance and the cultural background within which maritime warfare duties are conducted. It discusses the national context in which Warfare Officers discharge their duties. Leadership and ethical matters are explored, as is the inter-relationship between personal attributes, values, leadership, performance and sense of purpose. There is no intention that this handbook replicate or replace extant policy and procedural guidelines. Rather, the handbook focuses on the enduring features of maritime warfare. Policy by its nature is transient. Therefore, as far as possible, the Warfare Officers Career Handbook deals with broad principles and not more narrowly defined policies that rightly belong in other documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 133 Deptford High Street, London Se8 4Ns Hotel Development Opportunity Executive Summary
    133 DEPTFORD HIGH STREET, LONDON SE8 4NS HOTEL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Colliers International and The Shard Goldenberg Real Estate have London Bridge London Eye great pleasure in offering this The City prominent freehold Deptford Shoreditch centre site with planning Deptford Deptford Tower Bridge Hotel Site permission for a select service Convoys Wharf hotel of 70 letting rooms. Deptford Park The hotel development is part of an extensive regeneration of Deptford centre and the area around Deptford mainline station. This represents a rare opportunity to acquire a site for hotel development within a key London location only minutes from London Bridge station. When completed the Laban Centre hotel will overlook the new cobbled piazza of Deptford Market Yard, a Deptford Market Yard central attraction surrounded by under arch, artisan retail outlets and two restaurants, the whole providing an attractive centre to Deptford. Situated on the corner of Deptford High Street and the railway station forecourt, the hotel site is exceptionally well located for quick mainline access to Central London destinations with local access east to Greenwich and the O2 Arena. High quality development continues to spread east from London Bridge and west from Greenwich, and Deptford now offers a vibrant leisure and work environment. The London hotel market remains one of the strongest in Europe and London the prime target for property investors globally. With limited supply Greenwich and restricted pipeline the Deptford hotel represents a very
    [Show full text]
  • A Spatial Approach to Analyzing Ships of the British Royal Navy During the 18Th and 19Th Centuries
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-12-15 Re-imagining Shipboard Societies: A Spatial Approach to Analyzing Ships of the British Royal Navy during the 18th and 19th Centuries Moloney, Michael Joseph Moloney, M. J. (2015). Re-imagining Shipboard Societies: A Spatial Approach to Analyzing Ships of the British Royal Navy during the 18th and 19th Centuries (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27594 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2674 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Re-imagining Shipboard Societies: A Spatial Approach to Analyzing Ships of the British Royal Navy during the 18th and 19th Centuries by Michael Joseph Moloney A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ARCHAELOGY CALGARY, ALBERTA DECEMBER, 2015 © Michael J. Moloney 2015 Abstract Investigation into underwater archaeology began, inevitably, with the investigation of shipwrecks. For decades whole divisions of our discipline have focused on studying the intricate characteristics and mechanisms involved in the propulsion, construction, and manipulation of ships themselves (e.g. nautical archaeology). However, as Mortimer Wheeler noted, “the archaeologist is digging up, not things, but people” (Wheeler 1954: 13), so how do we extract information about those crewing these ships from shipwrecks? In this study I examine the spatial organization of ships in an effort to reconstruct the social dynamics of shipboard society.
    [Show full text]
  • No.3 August 2012
    TopmastsAugust 2012 No. 3 The Quarterly Newsletter of The Society for Nautical Research Chairman’s Column in 1911, as well as tracking down previous The 2012 Victory Medal owners and surviving descendants from the builder’s family from whom he could acquire When the late Austin Farrar conceived the idea direct knowledge, documentary and pictorial of the Society’s Victory Medal in the 1990s it information. He also spent many hours with was intended as recognition of the contribution the descendants of Lewis Alexander (the pilot that individual members of the Portsmouth who commissioned Kindly Light), learning Dockyard staff had made to the continuing about her working life and the way she would restoration and conservation work on HMS have been handled. Victory. In the Society’s centenary year Malcolm’s attention to detail has ensured Council decided that the terms for the award complete authenticity in the project, with of the medal would be altered so that it could Kindly Light now painted in her original build recognise the skilled and invaluable work that colour scheme, original accommodation layout, people put into the conservation of other ships, and pilot cutter deck fittings, incorporating great and small. The winner of the Victory parts traced from other vessels or replicated Medal this year was Malcolm Mckeand and the from surviving drawings or descriptions. medal was presented to Malcolm immediately Malcolm also took the challenging decision not prior to our dinner on board HMS Victory to install an engine so that the vessel will be following the AGM on the 16 June.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenox Vision MAY 2018:Layout 1
    The Lenox Project Vision A lasting legacy for Deptford A project to build and sail a 17th century royal naval ship, create a dockyard museum and establish a centre of excellence for historic shipbuilding and restoration May 2018 The Lenox Project PATRONS: Dame Joan Ruddock, Dan Snow The Lenox Project 2a Creekside, Deptford, London SE8 4SA Tel +44 (0)7836 268068 [email protected] www.buildthelenox.org The Lenox Project © May 2018 Registered Charity no. 1171252 Registered in England & Wales. Company No: 7952149 Cover: L’Hermione construction; painting of the Lenox passing Greenwich on her 1678 maiden voyage from Deptford to Chatham by Richard Endsor; L’Hermione visitors during construction; Gothëborg visitors at her home port; Gothëborg sea cadets; L’Hermione crew; Gothëborg crew. Illustration acknowledgements: Richard Endsor 1, 3, 5, 17, 26; National Maritime Museum 8, 9, 12; Hutchison Whampoa 11, 29; Hermione-La Fayette Association 1, 13, 14, 15, 25, 28, 30, 31, 32; Swedish East India Company (SOIC) 1, 15; National Portrait Gallery 16; The Royal Society 16; Fram Museum Oslo 21; Royal Albert Memorial Museum 22; National Gallery of Canada 22; Trustees of the Royal Marines Museum 22; Mary Rose Museum, Portsmouth 23; Historic Dockyard Poltava 30, 31 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 5 Our vision 5 The project team 6 Our remit 6 2 Background 7 The Lenox 7 Deptford Dockyard 8 Kit model of the Lenox National significance 10 designed by Richard Endsor Archaeology 10 Heritage 12 Existing models 13 Project support 16 Evelyn’s legacy 16 3 Our Vision 17
    [Show full text]
  • Tugs & Towing News Index Newsletters 2015
    TUGS & TOWING NEWS INDEX NEWSLETTERS 2015 Article Chapter Issue $$$$ Accident/Salvage 31 $50 Million in Coins Salvaged from Wreck £3.8m Heritage Lottery Fund grant to restore historic Tugs/Towing 15 Steam Tug-Tender 10 Rescued in Grounding off Turkey Accident/Salvage 3 10 Years of X-BOW Ships Offshore News 58 1000 bhp Twin screw tug for sale Tugs/Towing 5 11 Missing After Panama-Flagged Ship Sinks off Accident/Salvage 96 Philippines 1100 bhp Twin screw tug for sale Tugs/Towing 6 152 Siem Offshore workers dismissed in Brazil Offshore News 39 16 m Pusher Tug Project Tugs/Towing 13 1600 bhp Twin screw tug for sale Tugs/Towing 7 1984 Damen built supply vessel ARMONIA entering Offshore News 30 Malta on her delivery voyage 2 dead in HCMC boat blast Accident/Salvage 4 2000 guests on board Grand Canyon II Offshore News 24 2014 Towing Industry Safety Statistics Tugs/Towing 66 22 people including 4 Singaporeans are missing after Tugs/Towing 5 tugboat sank in China’s Yangtze 25 MW icebreaker to be delivered by the end of 2017 Yard News 79 25MW Floating Wind Farm Planned off Portugal Windfarm News 92 27 bids for salvage submitted Accident/Salvage 50 2D Seismic survey starts over Chariot’s block offshore Offshore News 16 Namibia 3,000HP U.S. Flag Tug Sold Tugs/Towing 68 3i, AMP Complete ESVAGT Acquisition Windfarm News 76 4,653nm Tow Successfully Completed Tugs/Towing 57 5 Dead After Whale-Watching Boat Sinks off Canada Accident/Salvage 86 5 Dead as Passenger Vessel Sinks Off Philippines Accident/Salvage 27 52 diseased bodies found in dramatic SAR
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Deptford: a Place in Constant Motion
    Deptford’s waterside location has played a crucial part in its development having been allowed, independently, to generate its own in London was one of the principal reasons that it was responses to its own predicaments. And yet the consistent chosen as the site of new or experimental construction. Radical Deptford: waves of innovation – from the naval to the horticultural, The Lenox, launched from Deptford in 1678 as the first of social work to municipal architectural, the educational to Pepys’ ‘Thirty Ships’, remained the backbone of the fleet the religious – that flow from this place are mostly linked for the rest of the century. to ideas people bring with them, and in turn Deptford’s Second only to Pepys as a diarist of the period was A Place in Constant Motion willingness to embrace and develop them. The sense of John Evelyn, who took up residence on the edge of the being ‘done to’ may have created significant social strain Royal Docks at Sayes Court Manor, the ancestral home of at times but equally this experimentation has contributed his wife. It was Evelyn, and later his descendent William, From Henry VIII’s Royal Docks to Michael Craig-Martin and considerably to the sense of Deptford as a place. who initiated a new phase of innovation on this site, his Research and innovation began in Deptford in 1513 with celebrated horticultural experiments with plants and Herzog de Meuron’s Laban building, Deptford embodies progress Henry VIII and the establishment of the Royal Docks. planting proving as hugely influential as his writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE Report Title PLOT 15, CONVOYS WHARF, LONDON, SE8 3JH Ward Evelyn Contributors David Robinson Class PART 1 22 06 2020
    Committee STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE Report Title PLOT 15, CONVOYS WHARF, LONDON, SE8 3JH Ward Evelyn Contributors David Robinson Class PART 1 22 06 2020 Reg. Nos. DC/19/111912 Application dated 24 April 2019 Applicant DP9 Limited, on behalf of Convoys Wharf Limited Proposal Approval of Reserved Matters (layout, scale, appearance, access and landscaping) for Plot P15 (Phase 1) comprising the construction of a development plot ranging from four to nine storeys in height, proposing 124 affordable homes, 800 sq. m (GEA) of office use (Class B1), 300 sq. m (GEA) of retail uses (Class A), parking, landscaping and other details pursuant to conditions 20(i) and 21(i) together with discharge/approvals under condition 3(ii) (Microclimate: Wind), condition 7 (Building Design Statement), condition 8(i) (Reconciliation Document), condition 10 (Housing 'Residential Space Standards'), condition 13 (Heritage Statement), condition 14(i) (Biodiversity), condition 15 (Energy Strategy), condition 19 (Drainage and Flood Risk), condition 30(i) (Residential Open Space), condition 42 (i) (Public Open Space and Landscaping), condition 45(i) (Contaminated Land) of Outline Planning Permission ref. DC/13/83358 for the comprehensive redevelopment of Convoys Wharf, Prince Street, London, SE8 3JH. Applicant’s Plan Nos. 2056-A-L-501 Rev 1; 2056-A-L-500 Rev 1; 2056-A-L- 502 Rev 1; 2056-A-L-401 Rev 1; 2056-A-L-400 Rev 1; 2056-A-L-302 Rev 00; 2056-A-L-301 Rev 00; 2056-A- L-300 Rev 00; 2056-A-L-202; 2056-A-L-201; 2056-A- L-200; 2056-A-L-109; 2056-A-L-107; 2056-A-L-002;
    [Show full text]
  • Chatham Dockyard and a Little-Known Shipwright, Matthew Baker (1530-1613)
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society CHATHAM DOCKYARD AND A LITTLE-KNOWN SHIPWRIGHT, MATTHEW BAKER (1530-1613) MARGARET BLATCHER Behind the scenes of many great events in history there often stands an inconspicuous figure whose influence was decisive in the end result. Such a man was Matthew Baker, shipwright to Queen Elizabeth I. Appointed head of the newly-developing dockyard at Chatham as the first man ever to be accorded the title of royal Master Shipwright, on Lady Day, 1572,1 he was destined to make the most important contribution to shipbuilding progress since primitive man discovered how to convey himself across water. Matthew's revolutionary designs for warships brought England to the foremost place in sixteenth-century maritime power. To him must go, as well as to the seamanship and gunnery of English sailors, much of the credit for the victory of the English fleet over Spain's 'invincible' Armada in 1588; to his skill and daring innovation, too, belongs due merit for so many successful exploits in oceanic discovery and exploration at a time when the globe was first in process of being mapped. Sir Francis Drake, most daring, most audacious among the famous seamen of his age, proclaimed the excellence of English vessels in New World expeditions as well as in war. The first ship of the new design, the appropriately-named Foresight (250 tons), was built by Matthew at Deptford in 1570. This had the longer, leaner lines, the fo'c'stle set back from the prow and the lower hull devised for less wind resistance that marked the drastic re-planning introduced in the late Elizabethan era.
    [Show full text]