DOCSLIB.ORG

The Boston MPO and the Transportation Planning Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Boston MPO and the Transportation Planning Process Transportation Improvement Program Federal Fiscal Years 2018–2022 Public Review DRAFT Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Public Review Draft TRANSPORTATION To be approved by the Boston Region IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Metropolitan Planning Organization AND AIR QUALITY on April 20, 2017 CONFORMITY DETERMINATION: FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2018–22 Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, which is composed of the: MassDOT Office of Planning and Programming City of Somerville (Inner Core Committee) Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority City of Woburn (North Suburban Planning Council) Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Advisory Board Town of Arlington (At-Large Town) MassDOT Highway Department Town of Bedford Massachusetts Port Authority (Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination) Metropolitan Area Planning Council Town of Braintree (South Shore Coalition) Regional Transportation Advisory Council Town of Framingham (MetroWest Regional Collaborative) City of Boston Town of Lexington (At-Large Town) City of Beverly (North Shore Task Force) Town of Medway (South West Advisory Planning Committee) City of Everett (At-Large City) Town of Norwood (Three Rivers Interlocal Council) City of Newton (At-Large City) Federal Highway Administration (nonvoting) Federal Transit Administration (nonvoting) The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other federal and state nondiscrimination statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. The MPO does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, English proficiency, income, religious creed, ancestry, disability, age, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or military service. Any person who believes herself/himself or any specific class of persons has been subjected to discrimination prohibited by Title VI, ADA, or other non-discrimination statute or regulation may, herself/himself or via a representative, file a written complaint with the MPO. A complaint must be filed no later than 180 calendar days after the date on which the person believes the discrimination occurred. A complaint form and additional information can be obtained by contacting the MPO (see below) or at www.bostonmpo.org. Please visit www.ctps.org to view the full TIP. To request a copy of the TIP in CD or accessible formats, please contact us by any of the following means: Mail Boston Region MPO Certification Activities Group 10 Park Plaza, Suite 2150 Boston, MA 02116-3968 Telephone: 857.702.3700 TTY: 617.973.7089 Fax: 617.570.9192 Email: [email protected] This document was funded in part through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation. Its contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. DOT. PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR SELF CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS OF THE BOSTON REGION MPO PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR SELF CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS OF THE BOSTON REGION MPO PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR GHG SELF CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS OF THE BOSTON REGION MPO PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR GHG SELF CERTIFICATION DOCUMENTS OF THE BOSTON REGION MPO Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 CHAPTER ONE – THE 3C PROCESS 1-1 CHAPTER TWO – THE TIP PROCESS 2-1 CHAPTER THREE – SUMMARY OF HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT PROGRAMMING 3-1 Project Tables FFYs 2018 – 22 3-3 Highway Program – Project Detail Pages – under development 3-35 CHAPTER FOUR – TRACKING AND DEMONSTRATING PROGRESS USING PERFORMANCE MEASURES 4-1 CHAPTER FIVE – DETERMINATION OF AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY 5-1 CHAPTER SIX – FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT 6-1 CHAPTER SEVEN – OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE – UNDER DEVELOPMENT 7-1 APPENDICES A Universe of Projects A-1 B Project Information Forms and Evaluations B-1 C Greenhouse Gas Monitoring and Evaluation C-1 D FFY 2017 Highway Projects Status – under development D-1 E Transit Projects Status – under development E-1 F Public Comments on the Draft FFYs 2018 – 22 TIP – under development F-1 G MPO Glossary of Acronyms G-1 H Geographic Distribution Analysis of the TIP’s MPO Target Programming H-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES Federal Fiscal Years 2018–22 Transportation Improvement Program Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS), which INTRODUCTION is the staff to the MPO, manages the TIP- The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning development process. Organization’s five-year transportation capital MPO staff coordinate the evaluation of project investment plan, the Transportation Improvement requests, propose programming of current and new Program (TIP), is the near-term investment program projects based on anticipated funding levels, support for the region’s transportation system. Guided by the the MPO in developing a draft TIP document, and Boston Region MPO’s vision, goals, and objectives, facilitate a public review of the draft before the MPO the TIP prioritizes investments that preserve the endorses the final document. current transportation system in a state-of-good repair, provide safe transportation for all modes, FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2018–22 TIP enhance livability, and improve mobility throughout the region. These investments fund major highway OVERVIEW reconstruction, arterial and intersection The federal fiscal years (FFYs) 2018–22 TIP consists improvements, maintenance and expansion of the of transportation investments programmed in the public transit system, bicycle path construction, and Highway Program and Transit Program. These improvements for pedestrians. investments reflect the MPO’s goal of targeting a The Boston Region MPO is a 22-member board with majority of transportation resources to preserve and representatives of state agencies, regional modernize the existing roadway and transit system organizations, and municipalities; its jurisdiction and maintain them in a state-of-good repair. extends from Boston north to Ipswich, south to This TIP also devotes a significant portion of funding Duxbury, and west to Interstate 495. Each year, the for the targeted expansion of the rapid transit system MPO conducts a process to decide how to spend and new shared-use paths. In addition, a number of federal transportation funds for capital projects. The the infrastructure investments in this TIP address ES-1 needs identified in the MPO’s Long-Range Highway Program Transportation Plan (LRTP), Charting Progress to The Highway Program of the TIP funds the priority 2040, or implement recommendations from past transportation projects advanced by MassDOT and studies and reports that were funded through the the cities and towns within the 101-municipality MPO MPO’s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). region. The program is devoted primarily to preserve The TIP also supports the strategic priorities of the and modernize the existing roadway network by Massachusetts Department of Transportation resurfacing highways, replacing bridges, and (MassDOT): reconstructing arterial roadways. • Reliability: Maintain and improve the overall In Massachusetts, Federal-Aid Highway Program condition and reliability of the transportation funding is portioned out by MassDOT, which allocates system funding to Grant Anticipation Notes (GANs) payments, various statewide programs, and the • Modernization: Modernize the transportation system to make it safer and more accessible state’s MPOs. The “Regional Target” funding provided and to accommodate growth to the MPOs can be programmed for projects at the discretion of each MPO. • Expansion: Expand diverse transportation options for communities throughout the REGIONAL TARGET PROGRAM DETAILS Commonwealth of Massachusetts During FFYs 2018–22, the Boston Region MPO plans FFYS 2018–22 TIP INVESTMENTS to fund 32 projects and programs with its Regional Target funding: Transit Program • 15 Complete Streets projects, including the The Transit Program of the TIP provides funding for reconstruction of Ferry Street in Everett projects and programs that address the capital needs • Seven Major Infrastructure projects, including prioritized by the three transit agencies in the region: the reconstruction of Rutherford Avenue in the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Boston (MBTA), the Cape Ann Transportation Authority (CATA), and the MetroWest Regional Transit • Six Intersection Improvements projects, Authority (MWRTA). The Transit Program is including improvements to Derby, Whiting, and predominantly dedicated to achieving and maintaining Gardner Streets in Hingham a state-of-good repair for all assets throughout the • Three Bicycle Network and Pedestrian transit system. Connections projects, including the extension of the Canal Street Rail Trail in Salem ES-2 Public Review DRAFT - Transportation Improvement Program • One Community Transportation program, high-density, built-out Inner Core communities to which will support first-mile/last-mile Developing Suburbs with large expanses of vacant connections across the region developable land. Figure ES-2 identifies the type of communities—as defined by the Metropolitan Area Figure ES-1 shows how the Regional Target funding Planning Council (MAPC)—that will receive these for FFYs 2018–22 is distributed across the MPO’s investments. investment programs. As the chart shows, the Boston Region MPO’s Target Program is devoted primarily to modernizing and expanding the transportation FIGURE ES-2 network through Major
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the Directors of the Boston and Maine Railroad for the Year Ending
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY 585A B665 I873/T5 I 887'/86 REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS Boston & Maine Railroad TO THE STOCKHOLDERS. §7§7€3ClI3£BE5Ci£%§7" IIDEBCZ. 1!), lE?7T3. BOSTON: ALFRED MUDGE & SON, PRINTERS, 34 SCHOOL STREET. 1873. BOARD OF DIRECTORS. NATHANIEL G. WHITE, LAWRENCE. E. J. M. HALE, HAVERHILL. GEORGE C. LORD, BOSTON. AMOS PAUIJ, S0. NEWMARKET, N. H. JOHN E. BICKFORD, Dovza, N. H. *CYRUS WAKEFIELD, WAKEFIELD. NATHANIEL J. BRADLEE, BOSTON. * Deceased. Cu: 221+ B665 ma 1'1/vs-‘Ian/sq, l$<5°>l754 wa. r»i\r-:7 ANNUAL REPORT. To the Slocklzolders of the Boston and Maine Railroad . THE Directors respectfully submit the following report, exhibiting the result of the operations of the road for the year ending September 30th, 1873 : - The gross receipts of the year ending Sep tember 30th, 1873, were $2,300,093 68 The operating expenses were 1,727,825 00 Net earnings for the year . $572,268 68 Being a little more than eight percent upon the whole capital authorized. The gross earnings of the twelve months ending September 30, 1872, were $2,046,142 19 And the expenses for the same time were 1,542,026 00 Showing ‘an increase in the receipts of the present year over the previous year of 253,951 49 And in the expenses of 185,799 00 The net income for the year ending Septem ber 30, 1872, was 504,116 19 Showing an increase in the net income of thepresent year over the previous year of 68,152 49 The expenses of the past year have been large; this results in part from the severity of the last winter, which for the transaction of railroad business was the most severe known for years, and put to the severest test all our rolling stock, increasing greatly our expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgetown Branch Shared-Use Path Feasibility Study
    Georgetown branch Shared-use Path feasibility study Merrimack Valley Planning Commission Prepared for the: City of Haverhill Town of Georgetown Town of Groveland Merrimack Valley Planning Commission February 2012 Table of Contents I Executive Summary............................................................................................... 3 II Introduction ............................................................................................................ 5 III History of the Georgetown Branch ........................................................................ 5 IV Existing Conditions ................................................................................................ 9 V Environmental Resources and Considerations .................................................. 144 Environmental Resources ................................................................................ 144 Considerations .................................................................................................. 177 Wetlands and Waterways ................................................................................. 177 Surface Waters ................................................................................................. 188 Hazardous waste releases and remediation ..................................................... 188 VI Overview of Trail Components ............................................................................ 22 VII Project Implementation Plan ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Annual Report of Town Counsel
    Town of Boxford Annual Report 2014 BOXFORD ANNUAL TOWN REPORT 2014 Boxford, Massachusetts BOXFORD OFFICIALS VOTERS ELECT Town Clerk Board of Commissioners Constables Assessors of Trust Funds (2) (3) (3) Planning Board School Committee Regional District (7) (5) School Committee (4) Moderator Library Trustees Board of Health (9) (5) Appoints Appoint Appoints No. Shore Reg. Director of Director of Vocational Libraries Public Health Committee Rep. Board of Selectmen (5) APPOINTS OFFICERS COMMITTEES AD HOC COMMITTEES Town Administrator Agricultural Commission Border to Boston Trail Animal Control Officer Community Preservation Haynes Land Advisory Communications Director Council on Aging Housing Partnership Director of Municipal Finance/ Board of Appeals Friends of the Ackerman Emergency Management Director Cultural Arts Council Playground Committee Town Accountant Cable TV Advisory Fire Chief Capital Budgeting INDEPENDENT Election Officers Community Preservation Act SERVICES FOR THE Forest Warden Computer Management TOWN OF BOXFORD Inspectors of Animals, Conservation Commission Boxford Athletic Buildings, Wiring, Fence Viewers Association Plumbing/Gas Finance Committee BTA/BOLT, Inc. Treasurer/Tax Collector Town Forest Historic Document Center Parking Clerk Historic Districts Commission H.A.W.C. (Help for Abused Police Chief Lakes, Ponds & Streams Women & Children) Supt. of Public Works Boxford Land Tri-Town Council on Youth Sealer of Weights & Measures Personnel Board & Family Service Town Counsel Permanent Non-School Building Boxford Cable Access Veterans’ Agent Recreation Television Veterans’ Graves Officer Recycling Registrar of Voters IN MEMORIAM 201420142014 Paul French (((1942-2014) Paul French was a past member of the Town Forest Committee, BTA-BOLT, and the Conservation Commission. He had his house built in Boxford and moved here in December 1971, with his wife and three girls.
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE...No. 269
    HOUSE... .No. 269. Commtmtot.iliij at House of Representatives, May 1, 1856. The Joint Standing Committee on Railways and Canals, to whom was referred the Memorial of the Danvers Railroad Company concerning the Boston and Maine Railroad Com- pany, together with the various Petitions in aid of the same, and the Remonstrances of the Boston and Maine Railroad Company, and of E. W. Upton and others, of South Dan- vers, against the Memorial, having, in numerous sessions, heard all the evidence which the parties desired to introduce, as well as the arguments of the distinguished counsel for the different parties, and having carefully weighed and consid- ered the same, beg leave to REPORT; That many of the matters alleged in the memorial, and which will hereafter be considered, appear to the Committee to be entirely irrelevant; and that though much evidence was adduced on both sides as to those matters, yet the memorial- ists themselves apparently admit the irrelevancy of these com- plaints, inasmuch as the counsel who argued their case threw 2 DANVERS RAILROAD COMPANY, &c. [May, all these matters aside, and rested the case of the memorialists upon this one point alone; That the Boston and Maine Rail- road Company, having acquired the control of the Danvers Railroad, by a lease authorized by Act of the legislature, after- wards entered into a contract with the Eastern Railroad Com- pany, a copy of which is appended to the memorial, by which contract the Boston and Maine Railroad Company agreed to pay over to the Eastern Railroad Company all the profits which the former company might make on any business from certain towns, the business of which was declared by the con- tract to be the proper business of the latter company ; and that it thus became the interest of the Boston and Maine Rail- road to.
    [Show full text]
  • Border to Boston Trail Implementation Plan
    Border to Boston Trail Implementation Plan Draft: January 15, 2007 Border to Boston Trail Implementation Plan – DRAFT 01/15/07 Acknowledgements The development of regional trails is a complex process involving the imagination, energy and coordination of advocates, elected officials, and professional staff at all levels. In preparing this Implementation Plan, its authors acknowledge the myriad of knowledge, activities, and support that comprise a successful trail building effort. The Implementation Plan is a product of the Border to Boston ad hoc coalition, whose participants are listed below. Staff of the Essex National Heritage Commission, National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program, Metropolitan Area Planning Commission, and Merrimack Valley Planning Commission jointly prepared the plan. The Metropolitan Area Planning Commission prepared all GIS based maps with input from the Merrimack Valley Planning Commission. The National Park Service Rivers and Trails Program and the Essex National Heritage Commission provided funding for the design, layout, and printing of the plan. Ingrid Barry Danvers Bi-Peds Marsha Blythe-Brown Boxford Rail Trails Committee Deborah Allen Carey Coastal Trails Coalition Stephen Davis Town of Boxford Carole Davis Boxford Rail Trails Committee Ed Deardon Newbury Planning Board Gregg Demers Topsfield Tail Trail Committee Win Dodge Wenham Matthew Duggan Danvers Bi-Peds Joe Geller Topsfield Rail Trail Committee David Hall Coastal Trails Coalition Annie Harris Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Hastings Georgetown
    [Show full text]
  • Ffys 2017–21 TIP Was Developed with Other Statewide Items Existing Contracts
    TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Federal Fiscal Years 2017–2021 BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION Endorsed by the Boston Region IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Metropolitan Planning Organization AND AIR QUALITY on July 28, 2016 CONFORMITY DETERMINATION: FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS 2017–21 Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Staff Directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization, which is composed of the: MassDOT Office of Planning and Programming City of Somerville (Inner Core Committee) Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority City of Woburn (North Suburban Planning Council) Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Advisory Board Town of Arlington (At-Large Town) MassDOT Highway Department Town of Bedford Massachusetts Port Authority (Minuteman Advisory Group on Interlocal Coordination) Metropolitan Area Planning Council Town of Braintree (South Shore Coalition) Regional Transportation Advisory Council Town of Framingham (MetroWest Regional Collaborative) City of Boston Town of Lexington (At-Large Town) City of Beverly (North Shore Task Force) Town of Medway (South West Advisory Planning Committee) City of Everett (At-Large City) Town of Norwood (Three Rivers Interlocal Council) City of Newton (At-Large City) Federal Highway Administration (nonvoting) Federal Transit Administration (nonvoting) Ipswich Rockport Topsfield Hamilton Essex Middleton Gloucester Wenham North Manchester- Reading By-the-sea Danvers Beverly Wilmington Reading Littleton Lynnfield Peabody Carlisle Wakefield Marblehead
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility and Conceptual Design Study
    Georgetown Recreational Path Feasibility and Conceptual Design Study Town of Georgetown, MA FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE July 2007 Georgetown Recreational Path Feasibility & Conceptual Design Study Georgetown, Massachusetts July 2007 Prepared For: TOWN OF GEORGETOWN, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared By: FAY, SPOFFORD & THORNDIKE LLC Engineers • Planners • Scientists Executive Summary The goal of this Feasibility & Conceptual Design Study was to determine the feasibility of developing a shared-use path along the Georgetown section of the former Boston & Maine Railroad, now used as a utility corridor. The corridor is owned both in fee and easement by National Grid, and is privately owned in the center of Town. The 4.5-mile Georgetown Path is part of the regional Border to Boston Trail, a proposed 30-mile trail (or shared use path) linking eight Essex County communities – Danvers, Wenham, Topsfield, Boxford, Georgetown, Newbury, Newburyport and Salisbury, Massachusetts. The Study outlines the corridor’s potential as a shared-use path and assesses the key design issues involved with the conversion process, including anticipated project impacts, required environmental clearances and right of way related issues. Two major design issues identified and addressed as part of the Study included the challenge created by the existing parallel rows of utility poles along the corridor and the need to realign the path through the center of Town. Along the corridor, the existing utility poles are either staggered or located in parallel. The conceptual design plans call for four proposed typical cross sections to address the varying horizontal offset between poles. Each cross section draws upon the design guidelines set forth in the MassHighway Project Development & Design Guide and the flexibility afforded to communities based on context specific conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boston and Maine Railroad
    The Boston and Maine Railroad A History of the Main Road, with its Tributary Lines By FRANCIS B. C. BRADLEE [Reprinted from the Historical Collections of the Essex Institute Volumes LVI and LVII] ESSEX INSTITUTE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS I 92 I NEWCOMB & GAUSS. Printers SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ILLUSTRATIONS. Hatmakket Square Station, Boston, . Frontispiece Old Lowell Station, Boston, .... Facing page 8 Portland Station, 1842-1873, 8 Haverhill Station, 1854, 17 Time-table, Newburyport, Danvers and Geobgbtown Railroad, 20 Newburyport Station, 1854, 22 Georgetown Station, 1850 24 Topsfield Station, 1854, 24 Time-table, Saugus Bbanoh Railroad, .... 26 Steamboat •' Daniel Wbbstbb," 28 Locomotive " Medford," 32 Locomotive "Lawrence," 40 Locomotive "Pacific," • 40 Steamboat "Dover," 42 Type of Early Train, 42 Hon. Israel M. Spelman 49 Lucius Tuttle, - 49 William Mebritt, 49 Charles Minot 49 " Walker House " Station, Portland, .... 50 Tickets and Passes, 8, 56 Locomotive " Mt. Washington," B. C. & M. R. R., . 64 HoosAO Tunnel Under Construction, .... 70 Locomotive "Conway," at Old Orchard Station, . 70 Locomotive " Gen. Grant," 74 Locomotive "Scarborough," 74 r 1 v>*-i — THE BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD. A History of the Main Road, with its Tributary Lines. BY FRANCIS B. C. BRADLEE. It has been remarked often that the present Boston and Maine Railroad system, with its thousands of miles of tracks extending through several States, resembles in composition a patch-work quilt, as with the exception of a very small proportion, the road consists almost entirely of a consolidation of small railroads formerly independ- ent of the Boston and Maine and of each other. Strange, also, as it may seem to the present generation, the Boston and Maine in its infancy, eighty-five years ago, derived its name and its corporate existence from an amalgama- tion of small branch railroads, which amalgamation was considered by our forefathers as tremendous an under- taking, as the huge consolidations of today, and was looked upon with as much suspicion and disfavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 1 File
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/historicalcollec15unse : ' :'- - ^ V.* . Xi’' ' , ';4^ ^ .-- 4 : k MIDDLE ROETE IW T -W EJ El r«J- D E GEORGETOWN, TOPSmLR AND DANVERS, Connecting at WEST »AMT£11S with Trains to and from SAEE9I. Trains from BRADFORD and CROY£l<AND connect with this line at G£ORCETOWN for BOSTOJV. Depot in Boston, - Boston and Maine Depot, Haymarket Square. Bradford, At HaverhiU Bridge. “ Newburyport, .... West of the TunneL FALL ARRANGEMENT. OH in IFTER MOniT, OCTOBER 23.^7 1854. .m. M. K FOR BOSTON. FROM BOSTON. NEWBURYPORT, 7.45, 11.00 A.M., 1.45, 5.00 P.M. HO.STON, - - 8 05 a.m., 12.00 m., 3.00, 5.30 p.m. - - - - BYFIELD 7.57, 11.12 1.57, 5.12 ! W. DANVERS, 8.45 12.35 3.35, 6 08 HAVER’L BRIDGE, 7.45, 11.00 1.45, 5.00 N. DANVERS, - 8.54 12.41 3.14, 6.18 - - 1 1.05 1.50, 5.05 - 9.08 12.58 3.-58, 6.32 GROVELAND, 7.50, i "OPSFIELD, GEORGETOWN, - 8.03, 11.18 2.03, 5.18 BOX FOR I), - - 9:i8 1.08 4.08, 6,39 BOX FORD, - - - 8.09, 11.25 2.09, 5.25 GEORGET05VN, 9.25 1.15 4.15, 6.46 TOPSFIELD, - - 8.18, 11.34 2.18,5 34 GROVELAND, - 9.31 1.21 4.21, 6.52 - - . - N. DANVERS, 8.33, 11 50 2.35, 5.50 1 BYFIELD, 9.32 1.21 4.21, 6.52 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1865
    This is a reproduction of a library book that was digitized by Google as part of an ongoing effort to preserve the information in books and make it universally accessible. https://books.google.com THE DIRECTORS BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD TO THE STOCKHOLDERS. WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 13, I860. BOS T 0 N : PKMTKD BY HENKY \V. DUTTON .V .SUN, Transchipt Building. 1 865. BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD. The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Boston and Maine Railroad will be held at LAWRENCE, in the City Hall, on Wednesday, the 13th day of September next, at Ten o'clock, A. M., for the choice of Directors, and the transaction of any other business which may be brought before them. By order of the Directors, James C. Merrill, Clerk. Boston, Aug. 16th, 1865. REPORT THE DIRECTORS or THB BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD TO THE STOCKHOLDERS. WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 18, 186*. BOSTON: PRINTED HY HENRY W. DUTTON SON, TkAlfBCIUFT Bvildixo. 1866. y BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD. BOABD OF DIRECTORS. ISRAEL M. SPELMAN, Cambridge, Mass. JAMES H. DUNCAN, Haverhill, Mass. GEO. W. KITTREDGE, Newmarket, N. H. DANIEL M. CHRISTIE, Dover, N. H. PETER T. HOMER, Boston, Mass. HENRY SALTONSTALL, Boston, Mass. NATHANIEL G. WHITE, Lawrence, Mm ANNUAL REPORT. The Directors submit to the Stockholders the following Re- port of the Operations of the Road for the year ending May 31, 1865:— The Receipts have been From Passengers, $824,700 97 " Freight, 394,038 53 " Rents, - 20,508 60 " Mails, 11,991 41 " Interest and dividends, - 14,729 34 " Portland, Saco, & Portsmouth Railroad, surplus, 30,000
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Commissioner
    HOUSE No. 50 REPORT OF THE TAX COMMISSIONER OF THE Commonwealth of massachusetts, FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1866. BOSTON: WRIGHT & POTTER, STATE PRINTERS, No. 4 Spring Lane. 1 8 6 7. (Eommcmumiltl) of ittassadjitstfte. Treasury Office, Boston, January 15, 1867. Hon. James M. Stone, Speaker of the House of Representa- tives. Sir:—I have the honor to transmit herewith, through you, to the legislature, a Report of the doings of the Tax Commis- sioner for the year ending December 31, 1866. I am respectfully, Your obedient servant, JACOB 11. LOUD, Tax Commissioner. 4 TAX COMMISSIONER’S REPORT. [Jan. (Eommomoealtl) of ilTassacl)usctts. Treasury Office, Boston, January 15, 1867. To the Honorable Senate and House of Representatives. The undersigned presents herewith his Annual Statement of the transactions in the office of the Tax Commissioner, for the year ending December 31, 1866, as prepared by D. A. Gleason, Esq., Deputy Tax Commissioner. Respectfully submitted, JACOB H. LOUD, Tax Commissioner. 1867.] HOUSE—No. 50. 5 £ommcmu)caltl) of iflaooadjusdto. Tax Commissioner’s Office, Boston, } January 14,1867, j Hon. Jacob H. Loud, Treasurer and Tax Commissioner. The following statement gives a brief summary of the opera- tions of this bureau, considered financially, during the year ending with the thirty-first day of December, 1866 : Whole amount of taxes assessed under ch. 288, Acts 1865, General list to November 27, 1866, . $1,806,662 07 Additional taxes subsequently laid, ... 93 28 $1,306,755 35 Abatements subsequently made, . 1,488 22 $1,305,267 13 On Coal Oil , Mining ■, Quarrying and Companies One-twentieth of one per cent., — May assessment, ...
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS of the Topsfield Historical Society
    THE HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF THE TOPSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XXXII 1974 TOPSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY THE HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF THE TOPSFIELD HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME XXXII 1974 TOPSFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLISHED BY THE SOCIETY FOX RUN PRESS TOPSFIELD, MASS. 1974 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 PHOTOGRAPH OF MR. PROCTOR 6 THOMAS EMERSON PROCTOR 7 MAP OF THE PROCTOR LANDS 12 TRUST FUNDS OF THE TOWN OF TOPSFIELD 19 TOWN OFFICERS 1900 - 1950 43 INDEX OF ILLUSTRATIONS IN VOLUMES #1 - #31 65 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/historicalcollec32unse . INTRODUCTION The Publication Committee is pleased to present this thirty-second volume of THE HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS of the Topsfield Historical Society. During its first thirty years the Society, under its energetic Secretary, George Francis Dow, published twenty-eight volumes. Then in 1928 and 1933 two more of the series were printed and in 1951 Volume XXXI, containing the record of the Tercentenary, was published The Committee has worked with real enthusiasm and is indebted to many persons who have given such willing re- sponse to its correspondence and questions . During the years that the COLLECTIONS were published the Society appears to have flourished. Then following the Tercentenary the only thing that seems to have held the Society together was its interest in the Parson Capen House. However, there is much more than the distant past with which the Society is concerned. History is continually in the making as time fades into the past, and a stream of publica- tions is about the only way one can keep up a record for the future We have no doubt there are many persons with recollec- tions of Thomas Emerson Proctor with whom we did not com- municate.
    [Show full text]