DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Historical Development Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) The name Luxembourg came into being in 963, during an exchange between count Siegfried and the Saint Maxim’s Abbey of Trier. Count Siegfried became the owner of a rock, the Bock, on which a fortified castle was built. He called it Lucilinburhuc. The castle was soon to be surrounded by a village, a city and then a country. Thus, Siegfried came to be considered as the founder of Luxembourg. Until the middle of the 14th century, Luxembourg remained a relatively autonomous principality, more or less attached to the German empire. In 1354, however, the former county was raised to the rank of a duchy and acquired the Walloon county of Chiny. From the 14th century onwards, Luxembourg emerged as a genuine principality. In 1437, the dynasty of the counts of Luxembourg died out, and the torch passed on to the Habsbourgs of Spain. In 1443, Philip the Good of Burgundy acquired Luxembourg. This was to become a salient feature of its destiny: As it was integrated into the Burgundian State, and then into the Netherlands, Luxembourg became an intermediate between the French kingdom and the German empire. The death of Philip the Good’s son, Charles the Bold, put an end to the Burgundian reign. The northern principalities were taken over by the Habsbourgs of Austria in 1715 and were constituted into a confederation called the Netherlands. Luxembourg was a part of this confederation until 1839. In 1795, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and the principality of Liège became part of the French Republic. Luxembourg was named 'Département des Forêts'. During the reign of Louis XIV, Vauban fortified the city of Luxembourg. In 1815, the Congress of Vienna raised the duchy of Luxembourg to a grand duchy, thereby giving it theoretical autonomy while linking it to the Netherlands by means of a personal union: The two distinct countries were governed by the same Head of State: William I of Orange-Nassau, King of the Netherlands, Grand Duke of Luxembourg. The Treaty of London of 1839 confirmed Luxembourg as a State, at the same time dividing it into two: the French-speaking part was attributed to Belgium while the German-speaking one remained the grand duchy. That was the beginning of Luxembourgish identity, in particular with the emergence of the first national anthem in 18591. But Luxembourg realised that it could not be self-sufficient. In 1842, William II decided to join a customs union with Germany: the 'Zollverein'. Economically, the country grew significantly: iron ore deposits were discovered, railway lines were laid to transport coal. Luxembourg then formed a large mineral basin with Lorraine. The needs of manpower led to a considerable increase in the immigration rate. In 1890, the personal union between Luxembourg and the Netherlands was undone when the last male descendant of the Orange- Nassau dynasty passed away and the crown was passed on to the Nassau-Weilburg branch of the family, which was the only lineage of the Nassau family to have a male descendant. Luxembourg thus ended up with a dynasty of its own. Grand duke Adolphe was the first representative of this lineage. A German attempt to annex Luxembourg in 1914 failed. Had it succeeded, it would have jeopardised the grand duchy’s ongoing tradition of neutrality which was established since 1867. The failed attempt encouraged Luxembourg to free itself from the 'Zollverein'. It then signed an economic agreement with Belgium in 1921 known as the UEBL (Union économique belgo- luxembourgeoise), and adopted the Belgian Franc as the currency of the UEBL, whilst conserving the Luxembourgish franc as its national currency. The economic depression of the immediate post-war period was followed by a period of prosperity. From 1929 onwards, however, Luxembourg was affected by the world economic crisis. The steel sector mainly depended on France to provide it with iron ore and on Germany to purchase its steel products. During World War II, Luxembourg was subjected to a forced germanisation. Human losses amounted to 2 % of the total population during this period (1.5 % in France). What came out of that traumatic experience was the need to revive. Opening its arms to the outside world for economic purposes became then the grand duchy’s priority. In 1945, Luxembourg became one of the founding members of the UNO. In 1948, it abandoned its neutrality and joined the NATO in 1949 . The UEBL, which had been terminated during the Occupation, was re-enacted after the Liberation. In 1951, Luxembourg became a member of the ECSC (European Coal and Steel Community) – a time when the steel sector represented 75 % of the industrial production – and in 1957, it joined the EEC (European and Economic Community). The ECSC was to be the foundation of a new period of growth and joining the EEC marked the beginning of economic expansion. Luxembourg city was the first place where the ECSC began its work, and went on to become one of the three headquarters of the European Union, beside Strasbourg and Brussels. Starting in the 1960s, the birth of a vast financial market on the one hand, and the integration into the European Union on the other, turned Luxembourg into one of the most cosmopolitan cities of Europe. Luxembourg’s growing financial market compensated for the effects of the steel crisis of 1974–1975 and gradually took over its role as motor of Luxembourg’s economy. Today, Luxembourg is well represented on the international scene and plays an active role, especially in the field of providing aid to developing countries. Along with Belgium and the Netherlands, Luxembourg forms the Benelux community. It is also considered to be a European microcosm as well as being a model of openness and a 'calm little country'. Luxembourg is one of the founding members of the European Union. Located at the very heart of Europe, Luxembourg shares borders with Belgium, Germany and France. With its surface area of 2 586 km2, it is one of the smallest States of the European Union. The 2004 entrant Malta is the only country smaller than the grand duchy. ________________________________________ 1The national anthem consists of the first and the last verses of the song 'Ons Heemecht' (our country) dated 1859, written by the poet Michel Lentz and composed by Jean-Antoine Zinnen. In 1864 it was first performed in public at a major ceremony in Ettelbruck. Contrary to the French Marseillaise, which is a call to fight, the Luxembourgish national anthem launches a vibrant call to live in peace. This anthem expresses the contry's joy to become independent in tranquility and prosperity. The Wilhelmus anthem about the grand duke’s lineage is sung when members of the grand-ducal family arrive at an official ceremony and when they leave. DID YOU FIND WHAT YOU WERE LOOKING FOR? YES NO Contact * Message * Leave this field blank Source URL: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/historical-development-46_en.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tuyaux N° 123|2|2016
    Tuyaux N° 123|2|2016 Festival international d‘orgue de Dudelange 11.6 / Europäische Orgelnacht 17.6 / Fête de la musique 12.7 / Chapel Choir of Lincoln College Oxford University Agenda automne 2016 Patronages Impressum Sommaire Tuyaux est le bulletin de liaison de l‘a.s.b.l. „Les 4 Le mot du président Amis de l‘Orgue Saint- 5 Comité d’honneur du Festival ; Conseils d‘administration Martin Dudelange“ et le du Festival et des Amis de l‘Orgue cahier-programme of- 6 Amis du Festival ficiel du Festival inter- 7 Europäische Orgelnacht: national de musique Max Reger und romantisch-symphonische Orgelmusik d‘orgue de Du de lange. 8 – Max-Reger-Institut; Einführung Il est distribué gratuite- 10 – Teil 1: Gerhard Weinberger, Ulrich Walther ment aux membres des 14 – Teil 2: Jean-Baptiste Dupont, Roberto Marini Amis de l‘Orgue Saint- 18 – Teil 3: Chœur de Chambre Conservatoire Luxembourg Martin de Dudelange et mit Paul Breisch, Graham Barber aux Amis du Festival. 22 Fête de la Musique: Prélude festif suivi d’une visite de l’orgue Tirage: 25 Chapel Choir of Lincoln Collage, Oxford University 2.100 27 Concert pour orgue et orchestre Parution trimestrielle avec l’Orchestre Philharmonique Luxembourg Numéro 123 (2/2016) Verso Récitals d’automne Juin 2016 – 22e année Sponsors Rédaction: Alex Christoffel Layout: Stefan Hank Impression: Imprimerie Centrale, Luxembourg Edition du bulletin «Tuyaux»: Photo de couverture „Les Amis de l‘Orgue Saint-Martin Dudelange“ a.s.b.l. Max Reger komponierend Organisateur du Festival: Maler: Franz Nölken Festival international de Musique Datierung: 1913 d’Orgue de Dudelange a.s.b.l.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth As a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity*
    Chapter 8 The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth as a Political Space: Its Unity and Complexity* Satoshi Koyama Introduction The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth (Rzeczpospolita) was one of the largest states in early modern Europe. In the second half of the sixteenth century, after the union of Lublin (1569), the Polish-Lithuanian state covered an area of 815,000 square kilometres. It attained its greatest extent (990,000 square kilometres) in the first half of the seventeenth century. On the European continent there were only two larger countries than Poland-Lithuania: the Grand Duchy of Moscow (c.5,400,000 square kilometres) and the European territories of the Ottoman Empire (840,000 square kilometres). Therefore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was the largest country in Latin-Christian Europe in the early modern period (Wyczański 1973: 17–8). In this paper I discuss the internal diversity of the Commonwealth in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and consider how such a huge territorial complex was politically organised and integrated. * This paper is a part of the results of the research which is grant-aided by the ‘Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research’ program of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science in 2005–2007. - 137 - SATOSHI KOYAMA 1. The Internal Diversity of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Poland-Lithuania before the union of Lublin was a typical example of a composite monarchy in early modern Europe. ‘Composite state’ is the term used by H. G. Koenigsberger, who argued that most states in early modern Europe had been ‘composite states, including more than one country under the sovereignty of one ruler’ (Koenigsberger, 1978: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • News from Copenhagen
    News from Copenhagen Number 423 Current Information from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 29 February 2012 Prisons, economic crisis and arms control focus of Winter Meeting The panel of the General Committee on Democracy, Human The panel of the General Committee on Economic Affairs, Rights and Humanitarian Questions on 23 February. Science, Technology and Environment on 23 February. The 11th Winter Meeting of the OSCE Parliamentary the vice-chairs on developments related to the 2011 Belgrade Assembly opened on 23 February in Vienna with a meeting Declaration. of the PA’s General Committee on Democracy, Human Rights The Standing Committee of Heads of Delegations met on and Humanitarian Questions, in which former UN Special 24 February to hear reports of recent OSCE PA activities, as Rapporteur on Torture Manfred Nowak took part, along with well as discuss upcoming meetings and election observation. Bill Browder, Eugenia Tymoshenko, and Iryna Bogdanova. After a discussion of the 4 March presidential election in Committee Chair Matteo Mecacci (Italy) noted the impor- Russia, President Efthymiou decided to deploy a small OSCE tance of highlighting individual stories to “drive home the PA delegation to observe. urgency of human rights.” In this regard, Browder spoke Treasurer Roberto Battelli presented to the Standing Com- about the case of his former attorney, the late Sergei Magnit- mittee the audited accounts of the Assembly for the past finan- sky, who died in pre-trial detention in Russia. cial year. The report of the Assembly’s outside independent Eugenia Tymoshenko discussed the case of her mother, professional auditor has given a positive assessment on the former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, cur- PA´s financial management and the audit once again did not rently serving a seven-year prison sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeszyt-1 I Lam.Indd
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2012; 5 (1), s. 41–49 doi: 10.4467/20844131KS.12.006.0907 MAREK STARÝ (The University of Finance and Administration in Prague) Political and administrative system of Waldstein’s Lands Abstract The aim of this paper is to identify and describe basic mutual and different political and administrative characteristics of the lands under the rule of imperial generalissimo Albrecht of Waldstein. This man of Europian importance created in the twenties of the 17th century the Duchy of Frýdlant in north-eastern part of Bohemian Kingdom, moreover he became the ruler of German Duchy of Mecklenburg, as well as Emperor’s vassal in two Silesian Principalities, Sagan (1627) and Glogow (1632). It is quite interest- ing to learn about his arrangements in individual domains and to see, how some general principles of his reign were combined with specifi c steps proceeded from older particular traditions. It also shows undoubtedly, that Waldstein was really brilliant organiser, administrator and lawgiver who deserves intensive attention of legal history. Key words: Albrecht of Waldstein (Wallenstein), Thirty Years War, history of administration, Silesia, Bohemian Kingdom, reign on the absolutistic foundations, Duchy of Friedland, Duchy of Glogow, Principality of Sagan Słowa klucze: Albrecht von Waldstein (Wallenstein), wojna trzydziestoletnia, historia administracji, Śląsk, Królestwo Czeskie, rządy absolutne, Księstwo Frydlandu, Księstwo Głogowskie, Księstwo Żagańskie Imperial generalissimo Albrecht of Waldstein (or Wallenstein) († 1634) is undoubt- edly among the most signifi cant fi gures of Czech history. His importance defi nitely goes beyond the nation’s borders. Since the 19th century, he has even been considered to be a great national fi gure by the Germans, thanks to Schiller’s well-known drama.1 Waldstein played a considerable role in the history of Poland, both as a co-creator of European politics and as a military leader, whose activities during the Thirty Years’ War had infl uenced the Polish Respublica.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Individual Identity: Experimental Evidence
    Measuring Individual Identity: Experimental Evidence Alexander Kuo Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences Juan March Institute [email protected] Yotam Margalit Department of Political Science Columbia University [email protected] Abstract What determines the identity category people feel they most belong to? What is the political significance of one’s proclaimed identity? Recent research addresses this question using surveys that explicitly ask individuals about their identity. Yet little is known about the nature of the attachments conveyed in responses to identity questions. We conduct a set of studies and experiments that investigate these reported attachments. Our findings suggest that: (1) the purported identity captured in survey responses varies significantly within subjects over time; (2) changes in people’s primary identity can be highly influenced by situational triggers; (3) changes in purported self-identity do not imply a corresponding change in policy preferences. Our results are drawn from three studies that vary in terms of design, country sample, and research instrument. The findings have implications for research on identity choice, as well as on the use of surveys in studying the role of identity in comparative politics. 1 ―We have spoken to many people in this country [X] and they have all described themselves in different ways. Some people describe themselves in terms of their language, religion, race, and others describe themselves in economic terms, such as working class, middle class, or a farmer. Besides being [a citizen of X], which specific group do you feel you belong to first and foremost?‖ [Afrobarometer Surveys, 1999-2002] Introduction What determines the identity category people feel they belong to? What is the political significance of one’s proclaimed identity? The answers to these questions are important for understanding phenomena such as policy preferences, social cleavages, and perhaps even political conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Rise and Demise of the Self-Declared Caliphate of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq
    IN A BROKEN DREAM: LESSONS FROM THE RISE AND DEMISE OF THE SELF-DECLARED CALIPHATE OF THE ISLAMIC STATE IN SYRIA AND IRAQ TAL MIMRAN* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................77 II. THE PRINCIPLE OF SOVEREIGNTY AND THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER.............................................79 III. THE CASE STUDYTHE ISLAMIC STATE BETWEEN 2014 AND 2017.......................................................................91 IV. THE DREAM OF THE CALIPHATE AND STATEHOOD................99 A. The Criteria for Statehood............................................100 1. Permanent Population............................................101 2. Defined Territory ....................................................102 3. Effective Government .............................................102 4. Capacity to Enter into Relations with Other States ............................................................103 B. What’s Recognition Got To Do with It? ........................103 V. FUNCTIONALISM, DETERRITORIALIZATION, AND THE ISLAMIC STATE IN THE AGE OF THE RISE OF NSAS............112 VI. CONCLUSION........................................................................127 I. INTRODUCTION The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (Islamic State)1 is a terrorist organization that took over significant territories, in the context of the Syrian civil war,2 and declared itself a caliphate in June 2014.3 It transformed from a minor terrorist group into an alleged quasi-state, presenting capabilities and wealth like no * Doctorate
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Camberger Modell
    Fachdienst Kinderschutz Badehausweg 1 65520 Bad Camberg Telefon: 01523/3768757 Geschäftsstelle E-Mail: [email protected] Badehausweg 1 65520 Bad Camberg 06434/4028716 Krabbelstube [email protected] Kirchgasse 5 www.dksb-lm.de 65520 Bad Camberg Telefon: 06434/4028446 E-Mail: [email protected] Schülertreff „Bad Camberger Modell“ Kirchgasse 5 65520 Bad Camberg Telefon: 06434/4028447 Ganztagsschulkonzept an allen Grundschulen in Bad Camberg E-Mail: [email protected] Angebot: Kinderkleiderkammer Brandenburger Straße 2 65520 Bad Camberg Modell1 E-Mail: [email protected] Betreuung von 7:00-15:00 Uhr an 3 Tagen Elternbeitrag 40 € Modell2 Atzelkids Egerländer Straße 9 Betreuung von 7:00-15:00 Uhr 65520 Bad Camberg Telefon: 06434/4029104 an 5 Tagen Elternbeitrag 60 € E-Mail: [email protected] Modell3 Betreuung von 7:00-17:00 Uhr Familienbüro Weilburg an 3 Tagen Elternbeitrag 60 € Mauerstraße 6-8 35781 Weilburg Telefon: 06471/9567141 E-Mail: [email protected] Modell4 Betreuung von 7:00-17:00 Uhr an 5 Tagen Elternbeitrag 80 € Spielerei Kirchgasse 5 65520 Bad Camberg E-Mail: [email protected] Mittagsverpflegung an 3 Tagen Elternbeitrag 50 € Regenbogenkids Mittagsverpflegung an 5 Tagen Elternbeitrag 80 € Horstweg 2 65520 Bad Camberg Telefon: 0152/33768759 E-Mail: [email protected] Für eine reine Betreuung am Vormittag von 7:00 Uhr bis 13:00 Uhr kann zwischen einem und bis zu fünf Tagen gewählt werden. Pro Betreuungstag Kinderkleiderladen werden 15,00 € im Monat fällig (2 Tage – 30,00 €/Monat, 3 Tage – 45,00 Neumarkt 10 65589 Hadamar €/Monat usw.). Die Eltern können auch z.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-War Military Planning (Belgium) | International Encyclopedia Of
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 08 January 2017 Pre-war Military Planning (Belgium) By Christophe Bechet Following the Treaty of London in 1839, pre-war planning theories in Belgium oscillated between two positions: secure and defend endangered borders or create a powerful military stronghold in Antwerp. On the eve of the Great War, King Albert I and his chief of staff held opposing strategies for protecting Belgium. The King advocated a concentration of the army on the Meuse, where the Germans had completed fortifications in 1892, but the chief of staff ultimately selected a central position to secure his line of communication with Antwerp. The lack of a determined, standardized doctrine at the highest level of the army led to a mixed, compromised plan adopted hurriedly during initial mobilization in August 1914. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Behind “Protective” Walls 3 Soldiers Without an Official War Plan 4 1914: A “Poor Little” Army 5 Conclusion Notes Selected Bibliography Citation Introduction During World War Two (WWII), German occupants seized archives from the Belgian Ministry of War. 90 percent of these archives concerned World War I (WWI) and the years 1920-1930, but Germans also sent documents from the pre-war period, dating back to 1870 and earlier, to Berlin, where they were in turn taken by the Russians in 1945. In 2002, the “Moscow Archives” were Pre-war Military Planning (Belgium) - 1914-1918-Online 1/13 repatriated to the Royal Museum of the Armed Forces and Military History (MRA) in Brussels. The MRA’s inventories during the last decade remain cursory due to the documents’ haphazard journeys: pre-WWI documents were mixed with papers from the late 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Great Britain Entered the Great War Norman Simms La Salle University
    The Histories Volume 4 | Issue 2 Article 5 2019 Why Great Britain Entered the Great War Norman Simms La Salle University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Simms, Norman (2019) "Why Great Britain Entered the Great War," The Histories: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol4/iss2/5 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 4, Number 2 28 IV Why Great Britain Entered the Great War By Norman Simms Throughout the Twentieth Century and into the Twenty-First, many causes have been proposed for why Great Britain entered World War I (the Great War) on the side of France and Russia. Extensive research has indicated that the three most probable causes were the naval arms race, the German atrocities committed in occupied territories, and the violation of Belgium neutrality. Of these three, the violation of Belgium neutrality is most strongly supported as the ultimate reason why England committed itself militarily to the Entente. The book, “Twenty-Five Years” was written by Sir Edward Grey (official title: Viscount Grey of Fallodon, K.G.) who served as Secretary of Foreign Relations of Great Britain from 1892 tol895, again from 1905 to 1916, and died in 1933. Grey’s two- volume autobiography was first published in 1925 and focuses on the political and diplomatic aspects of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maps and Mapmakers That Helped Define 20Th-Century
    Historical research article / Lietuvos istorijos tematika The Maps and Mapmakers that Helped Define 20th-Century Lithuanian Boundaries - Part 1: Administrative Boundaries of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania Just Before the Partition of 1772 Andrew Kapochunas, Jersey City, New Jersey EN The leader of Russia, upon the pretext of protecting repeated and copied so many times as to pass for fact. minorities’ rights in a supposedly anarchic neighbor- So this first article in the series hopes to establish a ing country, occupies and annexes land belonging to valid visual starting point for the dismemberment of that sovereign nation. A primary driver of Russia’s the Grand Duchy within the Polish-Lithuanian Com- action: fear that Western-European thinking in the monwealth. Future installments will cover how the now-partitioned nation might spread, and cause prob- Russian Empire mapped their Grand Duchy territorial lems at home. I’m not talking about today’s headlines, acquisitions, the role that 19th and 20th century ethno- th century reality. but late 18 graphic and historical maps and their makers played How Lithuania went from being part of one of the in establishing boundaries after WWI, and the strug- largest countries in Europe in 1772 to one of the small- gles of 20th century mapmakers to accurately depict est after World War I is the subject of a series of arti- newly independent Lithuania’s boundaries. cles in which I hope to explain the role that maps and First, who was at the table carving up the Common- their makers played in determining, for instance, that wealth pie, and what did that pie consist of? Palanga wound up in independent Lithuania, while Trakai, Vilnius, Lyda and Gardinas didn’t.
    [Show full text]
  • Vienna International Centre
    Terms of Reference Organisational Section/Unit : UNODC, Brussels Liaison Office Office Phone: 0032 2 290 25 80 Duty Station: Brussels, Belgium Supervisor: Ms Yatta Dakowah, Representative and Chief of the Office Duration: 3 to 6 months (with a preference for 6 months) Starting time: Monday 3 September 2018 Deadline for application: Friday 17 August 2018 The main eligibility criteria for the UNOV/UNODC internship programme are: - Interns may be accepted provided that one of the following conditions is met: ✓ The applicant must be enrolled in a graduate school programme (second university degree or equivalent, or higher); ✓ The applicant must be enrolled in the final academic year of a first university degree programme (minimum Bachelor’s level or equivalent); ✓ The applicant must have graduated with a university degree (as defined above) and, if selected, must commence the internship within a one-year period of graduation; - A person who is the child or sibling of a staff member shall not be eligible to apply for an internship at the United Nations. An applicant who bears to a staff member any other family relationship may be engaged as an intern provided that he or she shall not be assigned to the same work unit of the staff member nor placed under the direct or indirect supervision of the staff member. More information on the UNODC Internship Programme website. Background information: The tasks of the UNODC Brussels Liaison Office are as follows: ✓ Enhancing and fostering partnerships with European Union institutions, in particular with the European Commission, and strengthening policy exchange and dialogue with key partners such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the World Customs Organization and the United Nations system present in Brussels; ✓ Increasing understanding of the work of UNODC related to drugs, crime and terrorism by promoting health, justice and security within the European Union and to a wider public; ✓ Promoting UNODC and the impact of our work to Brussels-based think tanks, NGOs, associations, universities and the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870
    CONTEXTUAL RESEARCH IN LAW CORE VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL Working Papers No. 2017-2 (August) Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt Please do not cite without prior permission from the author The complete working paper series is available online at http://www.vub.ac.be/CORE/wp Permanent Neutrality or Permanent Insecurity? Obligation and Self-Interest in the Defence of Belgian Neutrality, 1830-1870 Frederik Dhondt1 Introduction ‘we are less complacent than the Swiss, and would not take treaty violations so lightly.’ Baron de Vrière to Sylvain Van de Weyer, Brussels, 28 June 18592 Neutrality is one of the most controversial issues in public international law3 and international relations history.4 Its remoteness from the United Nations system of collective security has rendered its discussion less topical.5 The significance of contemporary self-proclaimed ‘permanent neutrality’ is limited. 6 Recent scholarship has taken up the theme as a general narrative of nineteenth century international relations: between the Congress of Vienna and the Great War, neutrality was the rule, rather than the exception.7 In intellectual history, Belgium’s neutral status is seen as linked to the rise of the ‘Gentle Civilizer of Nations’ at the end of the nineteenth century.8 International lawyers’ and politicians’ activism brought three Noble Peace Prizes (August Beernaert, International Law Institute, Henri La Fontaine). The present contribution focuses on the permanent or compulsory nature of Belgian neutrality in nineteenth century diplomacy, from the country’s inception (1830-1839)9 to the Franco- 1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), University of Antwerp, Ghent University/Research Foundation Flanders.
    [Show full text]