DOCSLIB.ORG

Gregg Jarrett: Hillary Gives Americans Fifty-Six (And Counting) Incredible Reasons Why She Didn't Win

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gregg Jarrett: Hillary Gives Americans Fifty-Six (And Counting) Incredible Reasons Why She Didn't Win Opinion Home Video Politics U.S. Opinion Business Entertainment Tech Science Health Travel Lifestyle World On Air T H E C L I N T O N S Gregg Jarrett: Hillary gives Americans fifty-six (and counting) incredible reasons why she didn't win By Gregg Jarrett Published September 14, 2017 Fox News NOW PLAYING Hillary Clinton embarks on her blame game book tour Editor's note: A version of this article originally appeared on September 13, 2017. Hillary Clinton’s new book entitled “What Happened” was officially released on Tuesday. Since then, she has been promoting it with the zeal of an indefatigable carnival barker. It seems to be working. Related Image Hillary Rodham Clinton, escorted by Leonard Riggio, chairman of Barnes and Noble, arrives to sign copies of her book "What Happened" at a book store in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2017. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) The line for her book signing at a store in New York City stretched around the block. Indifferent to her disciples who had already been waiting for hours, Clinton showed up an hour late. It must be difficult to meet such a demanding schedule, given all her promised appearances on “The View,” the “Today Show,” “CBS Sunday Morning,” CNN, MSNBC, the “Late Show,” and… well, you get the idea. Adoration can be burdensome for the adored. I’ve spent two days and consumed three packs of Tums trying to digest all 464 pages. (I’m a fast reader.) I initially counted 43 reasons Clinton gives for her 2016 election loss, as she meticulously faults all the people who sabotaged what was rightfully hers. But upon closer examination, I have discovered thirteen more who are to blame. Incredible. But not surprising. You see, Clinton has long had an aversion to the truth. Related Image Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attends a signing of her new book 'What happened' at Barnes & Noble bookstore at Union Square in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., September 12, 2017. (REUTERS/Andrew Kelly) She twists it, bends it and contorts it to fit her own needs and ambitions. And so it goes in Clinton’s current “blame tour” as she hawks her book with an eye toward fattening her already considerable bank account. If you are expecting the truth in “What Happened,” you will be left bereft. Her mythical memoir bears no resemblance to the truth of what happened in her losing quest for the presidency. Instead, Clinton engages in what psychiatrists call “projection” –when people persistently blame others for their own failings. They view themselves as chronic victims, refusing to accept personal responsibility for the decisions they alone make. Related Image Hillary Rodham Clinton, center, greets people who waited in line of a signed copy of her book "What Happened" at a book store in New York, Tuesday, Sept. 12, 2017. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) In Clinton's universe, everyone is to blame but her. She seems to have adopted the Richard Nixon spoof, "I accept the responsibility, but not the blame." And, like Nixon, Clinton’s name is synonymous with scandals and controversies, all of them self-created. No one forced her to set up a private email server. No one made her pocket $225,000 from Goldman Sachs for a speech. No one coerced her into using her foundation in a way that smacks of influence peddling and self-dealing. In rationalizing her behavior, Clinton tends to manipulate the facts and engage in wholesale deceptions, peddling one fatuous canard after another. She does it so often and so cavalierly that it seems second nature. Distortions and fabrications are endemic in her personality. Related Image Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrives for a signing of her new book 'What happened' at Barnes & Noble bookstore at Union Square in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., September 12, 2017. (REUTERS/Andrew Kelly) Yet, Americans saw through it. Polling data consistently showed that a majority of voters did not trust Clinton because they didn’t believe her. In politics, if they don’t believe you, they’ll never believe in you. This is Hillary Clinton’s fatal character flaw. The truth is Clinton was an uninspiring candidate who ran a flawed campaign. She ignored the advice of experienced political professionals. She never understood what voters truly cared about and failed to devise a coherent message that resonated with Americans. And, of course, she was marred by scandals of her own making and the copious excuses she conjured that few seemed to believe. But in her book and in her many public appearances and interviews, Clinton refuses to acknowledge the truth. That would take the kind of courage that demands honest self-reflection. She is incapable of doing so. If you want to empty your wallet for a book of fiction disguised as non-fiction, be my guest. If you don’t, here is a list of all of those who Clinton blames for her losing presidential bid. The list will, undoubtedly, grow as she continues talking about it. 1. Sexism 2. Racism 3. Misogyny 4. Xenophobia 5. Suburban women 6. James Comey 7. FBI 8. Russians 9. Vladimir Putin 10. WikiLeaks 11. D.N.C. 12. Barack Obama 13. Joe Biden 14. Bernie Sanders 15. Anthony Weiner 16. Electoral College 17. Polling Data 18. Cable News 19. New York Times 20. Fake News 21. Bots 22. Facebook 23. Twitter 24. Netflix 25. TV Executives 26. ‘Anti-American forces’ 27. Democrat documentaries 28. Low information voters 29. People wanting change 30. People who assumed she’d win 31. Republican Party 32. “Content farms in Macedonia’ 33. Infowars 34. Goosefer 35. DC Leaks 36. Jill Stein 37. Steve Bannon 38. Voter I-D laws 39. Chief Justice John Roberts 40. KS Sec. of State, Kris Kobach 41. Citizens United 42. Colluding Trump officials 43. Benghazi 44. Rep. Kevin McCarthy 45. Gen. Michael Flynn 46. Julian Assange 47. Roger Stone 48. Reddit 49. Drudge Report 50. Alex Jones 51. Russia Today (RT) 52. Sputnik Network 53. Robert Mercer 54. Koch brothers 55. NBC’S Matt Lauer 56. Fox News Channel Gregg Jarrett is a Fox News legal analyst and former defense attorney. You Might Like Ads by This woman is fighting for her right to be topless Fox News Lifestyle NFL kneeling protests based on false claims and misleading media reports Fox News Opinion These Are the Best Medicare Supplement Insurance Plans Yahoo! Search Woman kicked out of pool for wearing a one-piece swimsuit, fiancé claims Fox News Lifestyle People in Heavy Credit Card Debt Could Be In For A Big Surprise WFS This Old Testament Quiz Stumps 80% of Christians! Can You Pass? Zoo Thinking About Installing Solar Panels? Read This First Energy Bill Cruncher Site Index This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. 2017 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. All market data delayed 20 minutes. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MOTION to DISMISS V
    1 HONORABLE BRIAN MCDONALD Department 48 2 Noted for Consideration: April 27, 2020 Without Oral Argument 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 8 WASHINGTON LEAGUE FOR INCREASED 9 TRANSPARENCY AND ETHICS, a NO. 20-2-07428-4 SEA Washington non-profit corporation, 10 Plaintiff, 11 FOX DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. 12 FOX NEWS, FOX NEWS GROUP, FOX 13 NEWS CORPORATION, RUPERT MURDOCH, AT&T TV, COMCAST, 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION & RELIEF REQUESTED 17 Plaintiff WASHLITE seeks a judicial gag order against Fox News for airing supposedly 18 “deceptive” commentary about the Coronavirus outbreak and our nation’s response to it. But the 19 only deception here is in the Complaint. Fox’s opinion hosts have never described the Coronavirus 20 as a “hoax” or a “conspiracy,” but instead used those terms to comment on efforts to exploit the 21 pandemic for political points. Regardless, the claims here are frivolous because the statements at 22 issue are core political speech on matters of public concern. The First Amendment does not permit 23 censoring this type of speech based on the theory that it is “false” or “outrageous.” Nor does the law 24 of the State of Washington. The Complaint therefore should be dismissed as a matter of law. 25 MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 LAW OFFICES HARRIGAN LEYH FARMER & THOMSEN LLP 999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4400 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 TEL (206) 623-1700 FAX (206) 623-8717 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 The country has been gripped by an intense public debate about the novel Coronavirus 3 outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disability Drive by Anna Mollow a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements for the Degree of Docto
    The Disability Drive by Anna Mollow A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kent Puckett, Chair Professor Celeste G. Langan Professor Melinda Y. Chen Spring 2015 The Disability Drive © Anna Mollow, 2015. 1 Abstract The Disability Drive by Anna Mollow Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California Berkeley Professor Kent Puckett, Chair This dissertation argues that the psychic force that Freud named “the death drive” would more precisely be termed “the disability drive.” Freud‟s concept of the death drive emerged from his efforts to account for feelings, desires, and actions that seemed not to accord with rational self- interest or the desire for pleasure. Positing that human subjectivity was intrinsically divided against itself, Freud suggested that the ego‟s instincts for pleasure and survival were undermined by a competing component of mental life, which he called the death drive. But the death drive does not primarily refer to biological death, and the term has consequently provoked confusion. By distancing Freud‟s theory from physical death and highlighting its imbrication with disability, I revise this important psychoanalytic concept and reveal its utility to disability studies. While Freud envisaged a human subject that is drawn, despite itself, toward something like death, I propose that this “something” can productively be understood as disability. In addition, I contend that our culture‟s repression of the disability drive, and its resultant projection of the drive onto stigmatized minorities, is a root cause of multiple forms of oppression.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador Sichan
    The Newsletter of the Army Residence Community VolumeThe 32 Number 9 Eagle September 2018 Sichan Siv Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Economic and Social Council will speak at September Eagle Luncheon Inside The Eagle Editor’s Notebook Please join with me in celebrating two of our September 2018: top writers: Mike Huebner, and Karen Wallace. 1 Front Cover: Ambassador Sichan Siv is For over two years now, Mike has submitted September Eagle Luncheon Speaker the absolute best historical descriptions of our 2 Contents & Editor’s Notebook: military history. Mike has brought us not only 3 Birthdays and Passings the who’s and what’s, but the why’s and the 4-5 Conversation with CEO therefore’s. 6 Healthcare Center Activities Coordinator, In the past two years Mike has covered the Nina Browan Punitive Expedition into Mexico, and serialized 7 The ARC Library the American Revolution, the Centennial of our 8 The Fall Golf Tournament participation in WWI, and captured the essence 8 Register to Vote, Update your Voter of 75 Years Ago: WWII. Month after month, Registration, Please, Do it Now the action is synchronized to the current month 9 Of Special Note, events which have caught of the Eagle. What you read in the Eagle, the Editor’s attention, perhaps yours too happened, either 75, 100, or 240 years ago, to 10 – 13 After the Battle, the Connection and the month. Continuation of Lives: Dan and Sherry Mendel, Bill and Gloria Wakeland Karen has continued one of The Eagle 14 The Straw at Saint Saens – World War II beloved features, that being resident profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Times May 28, 2019
    The Washington Times May 28, 2019 uncovered much about the scandal, while the mainstream A number of people quickly saw through him, notably media engaged in a coverup. There is no reason why Fox’s Tucker Carlson, who labeled him the “creepy porn investigative reporters from the mainstream media could lawyer.” MSNBC and CNN gave Mr. Avenatti credibility, not have done what Mr. Jarrett, Mr. Solomon and the others yet they appear not to have done even the most basic due did. diligence about him. If they had, they would have quickly discovered that he was not what he claimed to be. If the big media companies were private, they could cover or not cover anything they want to. But they are publicly- Red flags were everywhere. He dug out some woman to traded companies which have a fiduciary responsibility to claim that Justice Brett Kavanaugh had harassed her — their stockholders to operate both ethically and in a way that without a shred of evidence. It was obvious he was just maximizes the return to the shareholders. Fox continues to piling on to give himself more visibility. Yet, rather than gain market share but CNN now has only a small fraction pull the plug on him as any responsible media organization of the viewers Fox does. would have done, CNN and MSNBC continued to give him air time and threated his assertions as having merit. No hoax lasts forever. Eventually, the victims of the hoax and others catch on, no matter how the purveyors of the In the short run, he did boost their ratings and satisfy their misinformation try to spin it.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 2019 No. 46 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- Mr. HARDER of California. Mr. called to order by the Speaker pro tem- nal stands approved. Speaker, this week, the administration pore (Mr. CARBAJAL). Mr. HARDER of California. Mr. released its proposed budget, and I am f Speaker, pursuant to clause 1, rule I, I here to share what those budget cuts demand a vote on agreeing to the actually mean for the farmers in my DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER Speaker’s approval of the Journal. home, California’s Central Valley. PRO TEMPORE The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Imagine you are an almond farmer in The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- question is on the Speaker’s approval the Central Valley. Maybe your farm fore the House the following commu- of the Journal. has been a part of the family for mul- nication from the Speaker: The question was taken; and the tiple generations. Over the past 5 WASHINGTON, DC, Speaker pro tempore announced that years, you have seen your net farm in- March 14, 2019. the ayes appeared to have it. come has dropped by half, the largest I hereby appoint the Honorable SALUD O. Mr. HARDER of California. Mr. drop since the Great Depression. CARBAJAL to act as Speaker pro tempore on Speaker, I object to the vote on the Then you wake up this week and hear this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 the President's News
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 The President's News Conference With President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey November 13, 2019 President Trump. Thank you very much, everybody. Please. I want to begin by welcoming the First Lady with us today, and the First Lady of Turkey. Thank you very much for being here. This is a great honor to have you. And we had a wonderful and a very productive meeting. And before we start, I would like to thank President Erdogan for releasing detainee Serkan Golge, who was in detention—in different forms of detention. And I appreciate that very much. That was a very nice tribute. And he'll be coming back at some point in the not-too-distant future. So that's very good news for the United States and also very good news for Turkey. Turkey, as everyone knows, is a great NATO ally and a strategic partner of the United States around the world. Our economic relationship has tremendous potential and continues to expand and to grow. Direct engagement and diplomacy between our nations are essential to ensuring a future of peace and prosperity and promise for our citizens. Over the course of the day, President Erdogan and I had a frank and productive conversation on a range of very important topics. Among those topics we discussed was the situation in Syria. Last month, I sent Vice President Pence; Secretary of State Pompeo is with us; National Security Adviser O'Brien—thank you—to meet with President Erdogan in the hopes of ending all of the hostilities.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Disability Drive Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0bb4c3bv Author Mollow, Anna Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Disability Drive by Anna Mollow A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kent Puckett, Chair Professor Celeste G. Langan Professor Melinda Y. Chen Spring 2015 The Disability Drive © Anna Mollow, 2015. 1 Abstract The Disability Drive by Anna Mollow Doctor of Philosophy in English University of California Berkeley Professor Kent Puckett, Chair This dissertation argues that the psychic force that Freud named “the death drive” would more precisely be termed “the disability drive.” Freud‟s concept of the death drive emerged from his efforts to account for feelings, desires, and actions that seemed not to accord with rational self- interest or the desire for pleasure. Positing that human subjectivity was intrinsically divided against itself, Freud suggested that the ego‟s instincts for pleasure and survival were undermined by a competing component of mental life, which he called the death drive. But the death drive does not primarily refer to biological death, and the term has consequently provoked confusion. By distancing Freud‟s theory from physical death and highlighting its imbrication with disability, I revise this important psychoanalytic concept and reveal its utility to disability studies. While Freud envisaged a human subject that is drawn, despite itself, toward something like death, I propose that this “something” can productively be understood as disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment Inquiry Report
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .......................................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................12 KEY FINDINGS OF FACT ........................................................................................................34 SECTION I. THE PRESIDENT’S MISCONDUCT ...............................................................37 1. The President Forced Out the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine ...........................................38 2. The President Put Giuliani and the Three Amigos in Charge of Ukraine Issues ............51 3. The President Froze Military Assistance to Ukraine .......................................................67 4. The President’s Meeting with the Ukrainian President Was Conditioned on An Announcement of Investigations .....................................................................................83 5. The President Asked the Ukrainian President to Interfere in the 2020 U.S. Election by Investigating the Bidens and 2016 Election Interference ................................................98 6. The President Wanted Ukraine to Announce the Investigations Publicly ....................114 7. The President’s Conditioning of Military Assistance and a White House Meeting on Announcement of Investigations Raised Alarm ............................................................126 8. The President’s Scheme Was Exposed ..........................................................................140
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, As Amended
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 09/30/2013 11:33:19 AM OMB NO. 1124-0002; Expires February 28, 2014 U.S. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, DC 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending August 31,2013 (Insert date) I - REGISTRANT 1. (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. Beckerman 58771 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant One University Plaza, Suite 507 Hackensack NJ 07601 Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residenceaddress(es) YesD No D (2) Citizenship Yes • No D (3) Occupation Yes • No D (b) If an organization: (1) Name Yes • No H (2) Ownership or control Yes • No H (3) Branch offices YesD No IS (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes D No B If yes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes • No D If no, please attach the required amendment. 1 The Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy ofthe charter, articles of incorporation, association, and by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver ofthe requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Of MAGA, Witch Hunt, and Fake News, Which Is the Greatest Stick of the Trump Covfefe?
    The Good, The Bad, and The Sticky: Of MAGA, Witch Hunt, and Fake News, which is the greatest Stick of the Trump Covfefe? Author: Dr. Devon Simons Affiliation: The Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Wales. Panel: ‘Stickiness and Silence: Explaining the Failures and Successes of Strategic Narrative’, presented at the International Studies Association Annual Conference in Toronto, Canada, March 23, 2019. Abstract: Building from topics in the authors previous paper, ‘Trump’s Matryoshka Method of Forced Perspective Concerning Russia’, presented for the panel, ‘Re-narrating Conflict: Media, Military and Public Translations of Strategic Narratives’, at ISA 2018; this paper will explore the stickiness of the phrases ‘Make America Great Again’, ‘Witch Hunt’, and ‘Fake News’, by President Trump. This paper will act as preliminary research towards a larger manuscript by the author. Towards that end, this paper will establish and test three discursive hypotheses; with the ultimate goal of narrowing down which hypothesis (a rhetorical narrative of President Trump) is most ripe for further research. By identifying discursive components surrounding certain phrases that have already risen to popularity, and ‘stuck’ within mainstream conversation, this paper seeks to identify how the phrases MAGA, Witch Hunt, and Fake News, may be anticipated to either stick to the Trump Presidency past its tenure, or which have sell-by date upon which they may fall into silence. Introduction Why do some phrases, templates, frames, or narratives, thrive in the digital media ecology when others do not? How do scholars define, measure, and anticipate ‘success’ concerning contemporary communication? With increasingly urgent and erratic discourse being thrown into the chaos of mainstream communication, how can we begin to understand why certain phrases seem to stick? This line of questioning has expanded in recent years, specifically surrounding the effectiveness and accuracy of political posts on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight of the U.S. Department of Justice
    OVERSIGHT OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 8, 2019 Serial No. 116–3 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available http://judiciary.house.gov or www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–001 WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:42 May 22, 2019 Jkt 036001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\A001.XXX A001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JERROLD NADLER, New York, Chairman ZOE LOFGREN, California DOUG COLLINS, Georgia, Ranking Member SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., STEVE COHEN, Tennessee Wisconsin HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia STEVE CHABOT, Ohio THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas KAREN BASS, California JIM JORDAN, Ohio CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana KEN BUCK, Colorado HAKEEM S. JEFFRIES, New York JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island MARTHA ROBY, Alabama ERIC SWALWELL, California MATT GAETZ, Florida TED LIEU, California MIKE JOHNSON, Louisiana JAMIE RASKIN, Maryland ANDY BIGGS, Arizona PRAMILA JAYAPAL, Washington TOM MCCLINTOCK, California VAL BUTLER DEMINGS, Florida DEBBIE LESKO, Arizona J. LUIS CORREA, California GUY RESCHENTHALER, Pennsylvania MARY GAY SCANLON, Pennsylvania, BEN CLINE, Virginia Vice-Chair KELLY ARMSTRONG, North Dakota SYLVIA R. GARCIA, Texas W. GREGORY STEUBE, Florida JOE NEGUSE, Colorado LUCY MCBATH, Georgia GREG STANTON, Arizona MADELEINE DEAN, Pennsylvania DEBBIE MUCARSEL-POWELL, Florida VERONICA ESCOBAR, Texas PERRY APELBAUM, Majority Staff Director & Chief Counsel BRENDAN BELAIR, Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 00:42 May 22, 2019 Jkt 036001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\HR\OC\A001.XXX A001 C O N T E N T S FEBRUARY 8, 2019 OPENING STATEMENTS Page The Honorable Jerrold Nadler, a Representative in the Congress from the State of New York, and Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Fromuth, August B. 9.28.18
    STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Honorarium or Expense Reimbursement Report (RSA 14-C) For Legislators and Legislative Employees Type or Print all Information Clearly: Name: f\l/~}J S ~ '~(-\VIol oMW Work Phone No.: Go"J G, J \ C)::J '- H First Middle Last Work Address: --~-'--'-_-\;:.....t.-_~__h..::_' .t.R_-+-_,0;~- '\'-'-:\-"-t...._u-'-r-"-~'-''-'N'-=--J.\-\-\---------------- 1 Office/ Appointment/Employment held: __"S=l _,_\=Cl,.__-\{-=----I.J:~='\2~{=-- e::..S_.e..::::_~~=-:..:h...::.v_e__________ _ List the full name, post office address, occupation, and principal place of business, if any, of the source of any reportable honorarium, expense reimbursement, ticket or free admission to a political, charitable, or ceremonial event, or meals or beverages consumed at a meeting or event, the purpose of which is to discuss official business, with a value greater than $50. Source of Expense Reimbursement, Honorarium, Ticket or Free Admission, or Meals and/or Beverages: If the source is an Individual: Name of Source: ----~Fi~rs~t--------~M~i~dd~le~---------rL~ast~~~R~E~C~E~I~V~E==D~ Post Office Address: ---------------------------------+-~------------ Occupation: ---------------------------------------------t-----~'lort.J-J--1\-~H*­ Principal Place of Business: ------------------------~-.~~~~~~F DEPARTMENT OF STATE If the source is a Corporation or other Entity: Name~Co~m~onmE~hy: __~~o~--~~~~--~---------------------------------------------- Name of Person Representing the Corporation/Entity: ~\) \ ~ ~\.f-e \ \_ ~ I c_ \f\C'L \ r ~ CL "\.. Work Address of Person Representing the Co~oration!Entity: a3uD (\.c..,'~ e\f\ ~ uA ~ {1-)\v t, <;v~k \3D') A-<\ ~ \A~ tv " 1 \) f\ ~ ~ C { I am reporting: 0 An Expense Reimbursement with value over $50.00.
    [Show full text]