2Zib Lichtarge Lab 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Zib Lichtarge Lab 2006 Pages 1–5 2zib Evolutionary trace report by report maker September 10, 2008 4.3.1 Alistat 5 4.3.2 CE 5 4.3.3 DSSP 5 4.3.4 HSSP 5 4.3.5 LaTex 5 4.3.6 Muscle 5 4.3.7 Pymol 5 4.4 Note about ET Viewer 5 4.5 Citing this work 5 4.6 About report maker 5 4.7 Attachments 5 1 INTRODUCTION From the original Protein Data Bank entry (PDB id 2zib): Title: Crystal structure analysis of calcium-independent type ii antifreeze protein Compound: Mol id: 1; molecule: type ii antifreeze protein; chain: a; engineered: yes Organism, scientific name: Brachyopsis Rostratus; 2zib contains a single unique chain 2zibA (130 residues long). CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 CHAIN 2ZIBA 2.1 P05140 overview 2 Chain 2zibA 1 From SwissProt, id P05140, 68% identical to 2zibA: 2.1 P05140 overview 1 Description: Type II antifreeze protein precursor (AFP). 2.2 Multiple sequence alignment for 2zibA 1 Organism, scientific name: Hemitripterus americanus (Sea raven). 2.3 Residue ranking in 2zibA 1 Taxonomy: Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; 2.4 Top ranking residues in 2zibA and their position on Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Neopterygii; Teleostei; Euteleostei; the structure 1 Neoteleostei; Acanthomorpha; Acanthopterygii; Percomorpha; Scor- 2.4.1 Clustering of residues at 25% coverage. 2 paeniformes; Cottoidei; Hemitripteridae; Hemitripterus. 2.4.2 Overlap with known functional surfaces at Function: Antifreeze proteins lower the blood freezing point. 25% coverage. 2 Subcellular location: Secreted. 2.4.3 Possible novel functional surfaces at 25% Similarity: Contains 1 C-type lectin domain. coverage. 3 About: This Swiss-Prot entry is copyright. It is produced through a 3 Notes on using trace results 3 collaboration between the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and the EMBL outstation - the European Bioinformatics Institute. There are 3.1 Coverage 3 no restrictions on its use as long as its content is in no way modified 3.2 Known substitutions 4 and this statement is not removed. 3.3 Surface 4 3.4 Number of contacts 4 2.2 Multiple sequence alignment for 2zibA 3.5 Annotation 4 3.6 Mutation suggestions 4 For the chain 2zibA, the alignment 2zibA.msf (attached) with 28 sequences was used. The alignment was assembled through combi- 4 Appendix 4 nation of BLAST searching on the UniProt database and alignment 4.1 File formats 4 using Muscle program. It can be found in the attachment to this 4.2 Color schemes used 5 report, under the name of 2zibA.msf. Its statistics, from the alistat 4.3 Credits 5 program are the following: 1 Lichtarge lab 2006 Fig. 1. Residues 4-133 in 2zibA colored by their relative importance. (See Appendix, Fig.6, for the coloring scheme.) Format: MSF Number of sequences: 28 Total number of residues: 3579 Smallest: 120 Largest: 130 Average length: 127.8 Alignment length: 130 Average identity: 36% Most related pair: 98% Most unrelated pair: 21% Most distant seq: 33% Fig. 2. Residues in 2zibA, colored by their relative importance. Clockwise: front, back, top and bottom views. Furthermore, 5% of residues show as conserved in this alignment. The alignment consists of 96% eukaryotic ( 85% vertebrata) sequences. (Descriptions of some sequences were not readily availa- ble.) The file containing the sequence descriptions can be found in the attachment, under the name 2zibA.descr. 2.3 Residue ranking in 2zibA The 2zibA sequence is shown in Fig. 1, with each residue colored according to its estimated importance. The full listing of residues in 2zibA can be found in the file called 2zibA.ranks sorted in the attachment. 2.4 Top ranking residues in 2zibA and their position on the structure In the following we consider residues ranking among top 25% of resi- dues in the protein . Figure 2 shows residues in 2zibA colored by their importance: bright red and yellow indicate more conserved/important residues (see Appendix for the coloring scheme). A Pymol script for producing this figure can be found in the attachment. 2.4.1 Clustering of residues at 25% coverage. Fig. 3 shows the top 25% of all residues, this time colored according to clusters they belong to. The clusters in Fig.3 are composed of the residues listed in Table 1. Fig. 3. Residues in 2zibA, colored according to the cluster they belong to: Table 1. red, followed by blue and yellow are the largest clusters (see Appendix for cluster size member the coloring scheme). Clockwise: front, back, top and bottom views. The color residues corresponding Pymol script is attached. red 33 10,14,17,21,22,31,34,35,38 44,45,47,53,56,57,66,67,68 69,78,80,82,90,91,96,104,115 116,117,120,128,129,130 2.4.2 Overlap with known functional surfaces at 25% coverage. The name of the ligand is composed of the source PDB identifier and the heteroatom name used in that file. Table 1. Clusters of top ranking residues in 2zibA. Sulfate ion binding site. Table 2 lists the top 25% of residues at the interface with 2zibASO4501 (sulfate ion). The following table 2 (Table 3) suggests possible disruptive replacements for these residues (see Section 3.6). Table 2. res type subst’s cvg noc/ dist (%) bb (A˚ ) 82 D D(85) 0.18 1/1 4.75 E(7) R(3) N(3) 44 H H(78) 0.21 15/0 2.66 Q(7) V(3) N(7) S(3) Table 2. The top 25% of residues in 2zibA at the interface with sulfate ion.(Field names: res: residue number in the PDB entry; type: amino acid type; substs: substitutions seen in the alignment; with the percentage of each type in the bracket; noc/bb: number of contacts with the ligand, with the num- ber of contacts realized through backbone atoms given in the bracket; dist: distance of closest apporach to the ligand. ) Fig. 4. Residues in 2zibA, at the interface with sulfate ion, colored by their Table 3. relative importance. The ligand (sulfate ion) is colored green. Atoms further than 30A˚ away from the geometric center of the ligand, as well as on the line res type disruptive of sight to the ligand were removed. (See Appendix for the coloring scheme mutations for the protein chain 2zibA.) 82 D (FW)(HR)(Y)(VCAG) 44 H (E)(TD)(M)(Q) Table 3. List of disruptive mutations for the top 25% of residues in 2zibA, that are at the interface with sulfate ion. Figure 4 shows residues in 2zibA colored by their importance, at the interface with 2zibASO4501. 2.4.3 Possible novel functional surfaces at 25% coverage. One group of residues is conserved on the 2zibA surface, away from (or susbtantially larger than) other functional sites and interfaces reco- gnizable in PDB entry 2zib. It is shown in Fig. 5. The right panel shows (in blue) the rest of the larger cluster this surface belongs to. Fig. 5. A possible active surface on the chain 2zibA. The larger cluster it The residues belonging to this surface ”patch” are listed in Table belongs to is shown in blue. 4, while Table 5 suggests possible disruptive replacements for these residues (see Section 3.6). Table 4. continued Table 4. res type substitutions(%) cvg antn res type substitutions(%) cvg antn N(3) 80 W W(100) 0.05 78 W F(50)W(46)Y(3) 0.19 120 C C(92)L(7) 0.07 S-S 35 E E(78)Q(10)K(7) 0.20 91 W W(92)I(7) 0.08 S(3) 14 W W(96)Y(3) 0.09 44 H H(78)Q(7)V(3) 0.21 31 W W(96)Y(3) 0.10 N(7)S(3) 96 P P(85).(7)F(7) 0.12 116 D N(71)D(10)A(3) 0.21 10 C C(89)V(7)I(3) 0.15 S-S V(7)R(7) 129 A K(64)Q(25)E(3) 0.17 117 D D(67)S(3)T(7) 0.22 A(7) P(7)N(14) 82 D D(85)E(7)R(3) 0.18 90 T N(60)F(10)A(7) 0.23 continued in next column T(7)Q(3)I(7) continued in next column 3 Table 4. continued guide - due to rounding errors these percentages often do not add up res type substitutions(%) cvg antn to 100%. D(3) 130 K K(64)R(10)E(7) 0.25 3.3 Surface I(10)M(7) To detect candidates for novel functional interfaces, first we look for residues that are solvent accessible (according to DSSP program) by 2 Table 4. Residues forming surface ”patch” in 2zibA. at least 10A˚ , which is roughly the area needed for one water mole- cule to come in the contact with the residue. Furthermore, we require that these residues form a “cluster” of residues which have neighbor A˚ Table 5. within 5 from any of their heavy atoms. Note, however, that, if our picture of protein evolution is correct, res type disruptive the neighboring residues which are not surface accessible might be mutations equally important in maintaining the interaction specificity - they 80 W (KE)(TQD)(SNCRG)(M) should not be automatically dropped from consideration when choo- 120 C (R)(KE)(H)(FYQWD) sing the set for mutagenesis. (Especially if they form a cluster with 91 W (KE)(T)(QDR)(SCG) the surface residues.) 14 W (K)(E)(Q)(D) 31 W (K)(E)(Q)(D) 3.4 Number of contacts 96 P (R)(Y)(T)(H) Another column worth noting is denoted “noc/bb”; it tells the num- 10 C (R)(KE)(H)(Y) ber of contacts heavy atoms of the residue in question make across 129 A (Y)(H)(R)(E) the interface, as well as how many of them are realized through the 82 D (FW)(HR)(Y)(VCAG) backbone atoms (if all or most contacts are through the backbone, 78 W (K)(E)(Q)(D) mutation presumably won't have strong impact).
Recommended publications
  • Hemitripteridae Gill 1872 Sea Ravens Or Sailfin Sculpins
    ISSN 1545-150X California Academy of Sciences A N N O T A T E D C H E C K L I S T S O F F I S H E S Number 5 September 2003 Family Hemitripteridae Gill 1872 sea ravens or sailfin sculpins By Catherine W. Mecklenburg Field Associate, Department of Ichthyology, California Academy of Sciences c/o Point Stephens Research, P.O. Box 210307, Auke Bay, Alaska 99821, U.S.A. email: [email protected] Fishes in the cottoid family Hemitripteridae are called sea ravens after an early notion that their large pectoral fins could be used for flight, or sailfin sculpins for their tall dorsal fins, particularly the excep- tionally tall first dorsal fin of Nautichthys oculofasciatus. Head and body covered with minute “prickles” (modified, platelike scales bearing a single skin-covered spine). Frontoparietal ridge knobby. Preopercular spines 3 or 4, mostly blunt and skin-covered. Two dorsal fins, the first with 6–19 spines, the second with 11–30 soft rays. Anal fin with 11–22 soft rays. Pelvic fins with 1 spine and 3 soft rays. Lateral line canal co mp lete, op en ing thr o u gh n u m er o u s p o r es ( m or e than 3 5) . V om er ine and p alatin e teeth p r es ent. G ill m em - b r an es broadly attached to the isthmus or forming a free fold across the isthmus. Branchiostegal rays 6. Gill rakers in the form of low, spinous plates or knobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog
    Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Photographs of various fish studied for this report. Background photograph shows Arctic icebergs and ice floes. Photograph from iStock™, dated March 23, 2011. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Ecology Catalog By Lyman K. Thorsteinson and Milton S. Love, editors Prepared in cooperation with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program (OCS Study, BOEM 2016-048) Scientific Investigations Report 2016–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2016 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Disclaimer: This Scientific Investigations Report has been technically reviewed and approved for publication by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The information is provided on the condition that neither the U.S. Geological Survey nor the U.S. Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from the authorized or unauthorized use of this information. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Techniques- Fishes
    Expedition Field Techniques FISHES by Brian W. Coad Published by Geography Outdoors: the centre supporting field research, exploration and outdoor learning Royal Geographical Society with IBG 1 Kensington Gore London SW7 2AR Tel +44 (0)20 7591 3030 Fax +44 (0)20 7591 3031 Email [email protected] Website www.rgs.org/go 2nd Edition, revised January 1998 ISBN 978-0-907649-71-7 Expedition Field Techniques FISHES CONTENTS Section One: Fishes and expeditions 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 What can be done 1 1.3 Preparatory work 2 1.4 Ethics 5 1.5 Safety 7 Section Two: Capture techniques 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Active techniques 12 2.2.1 Seine 12 2.2.2 Dip net and push net 14 2.2.3 Cast net and enclosure trap 17 2.2.4 Poison 17 2.2.5 Explosives 18 2.2.6 Angling 18 2.2.7 Night lighting and attracting 18 2.2.8 Tow net, trawl and dredge 18 2.2.9 SCUBA and snorkelling 19 2.2.10 Electroshocking 19 2.2.11 Ice fishing 20 2.2.12 Hand 20 2.3 Static techniques 22 2.3.1 Trap net 22 2.3.2 Gill net 22 2.3.3 Trammel net 26 2.3.4 Baited lines 26 2.3.5 Purchase 26 Section Three: Preservation 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Methods 29 Fishes 3.3 Containers 30 3.4 Packing 31 Section Four: Recording data 4.1 Introduction 33 4.2 Labels 33 4.3 Field Sheets 34 Section Five: Other techniques 5.1 Introduction 38 5.2 Ecology and behaviour 38 5.3 Parasites, diseases and anomalies 39 5.4 Molecular sampling 40 5.5 Larvae 41 5.6 Archaeology 41 5.7 Community surveys 41 5.8 Biotic integrity indices 43 Section Six: Specimen identification 6.1 Introduction 44 6.2 Keys 44 Section Seven: Fish Photography
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of the Early Life History of Fishes. Volume 1, List of Titles
    UC San Diego Bibliography Title A Bibliography Of The Early Life History Of Fishes. Volume 1, List Of Titles Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4p54w451 Author Hoyt, Robert D Publication Date 2002-11-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF FISHES. VOLUME 1, LIST OF TITLES Compiled, edited, and published (1988, copyright) by Robert D. Hoyt Department of Biology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101 Updated November 2002 by Tom Kennedy Aquatic Biology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0206 and Darrel E. Snyder Larval Fish laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1474 Dr. Hoyt granted the American Fisheries Society Early Life History Section permission to prepare, update, and distribute his 13,717-record bibliography (comprehensive for literature through 1987, but out-of-print) as a personal computer file or searchable resource on the Internet so long as the file is made available to all interested parties and neither it nor printed versions of it are sold for profit. Because of computer search capabilities, it was deemed unnecessary to provide a computer text version of Dr. Hoyt's subject, scientific name, common name, family name, and location indices (Volume II). As chairman of the Section's bibliography committee, I prepared and partially edited version 1.0 of this file from Dr. Hoyt's original VAX computer tapes and made it available in 1994 for download and use as a searchable resource on the internet. Dr. Julian Humphries (then at Cornell University) and Peter Brueggeman (Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library) prepared and posted the gopher- searchable and web-searchable versions, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY and MYOLOGY of the SUPERFAMILY COTTOIDEA (PISCES: Title SCORPAENIFORMES), and ITS PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION)
    COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY AND MYOLOGY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COTTOIDEA (PISCES: Title SCORPAENIFORMES), AND ITS PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION) Author(s) YABE, Mamoru Citation MEMOIRS OF THE FACULTY OF FISHERIES HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, 32(1), 1-130 Issue Date 1985-03 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/21877 Type bulletin (article) File Information 32(1)_P1-130.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP COMPARATIVE OSTEOLOGY AND MYOLOGY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COTTOIDEA (PISCES: SCORPAENIFORMES), AND ITS PHYLOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION By Mamoru YABE Laboratory of Marine Zoology, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan Contents Page I. Introduction 1 II. Materials and methods ......................................................... 3 III. Acknowledgments································································ 6 IV. Systematic methodology···· ..................................................... 6 1. Recognition of the monophyletic group· ...................................... 6 2. Determination of the polarity of the character· ................................ 7 3. Inference of the branching pattern ........................................... 8 V. Comparative osteology .......................................................... 10 1. Circumorbital bones ........................................................ lO 2. Cranium···································································· 16 3. Jaws······································································ 30 4. Suspensorium
    [Show full text]
  • 2Afp Lichtarge Lab 2006
    Pages 1–5 2afp Evolutionary trace report by report maker November 4, 2009 4.3.3 DSSP 4 4.3.4 HSSP 5 4.3.5 LaTex 5 4.3.6 Muscle 5 4.3.7 Pymol 5 4.4 Note about ET Viewer 5 4.5 Citing this work 5 4.6 About report maker 5 4.7 Attachments 5 1 INTRODUCTION From the original Protein Data Bank entry (PDB id 2afp): Title: The solution structure of type ii antifreeze protein reveals a new member of the lectin family Compound: Mol id: 1; molecule: protein (sea raven type ii anti- freeze protein); chain: a; engineered: yes; other details: six amino acid his tag was added at the c- terminal end to facilitate recovery of the secreted afp from the medium using affinity chromatography. Organism, scientific name: Hemitripterus Americanus; 2afp contains a single unique chain 2afpA (129 residues long). This is an NMR-determined structure – in this report the first model CONTENTS in the file was used. 1 Introduction 1 2 CHAIN 2AFPA 2 Chain 2afpA 1 2.1 P05140 overview 2.1 P05140 overview 1 From SwissProt, id P05140, 99% identical to 2afpA: 2.2 Multiple sequence alignment for 2afpA 1 Description: Type II antifreeze protein precursor (AFP). 2.3 Residue ranking in 2afpA 1 Organism, scientific name: Hemitripterus americanus (Sea raven). 2.4 Top ranking residues in 2afpA and their position on Taxonomy: Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; the structure 2 Euteleostomi; Actinopterygii; Neopterygii; Teleostei; Euteleostei; 2.4.1 Clustering of residues at 25% coverage. 2 Neoteleostei; Acanthomorpha; Acanthopterygii; Percomorpha; Scor- 2.4.2 Possible novel functional surfaces at 25% paeniformes; Cottoidei; Hemitripteridae; Hemitripterus.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Biological Data for the Winter Flounder, Pseudo Pleuronectes Americanus (Walbau M)
    414 NOAA Technical Report NMFS Circular 414 Synopsis of Biological Data for the Winter Flounder, Pseudo pleuronectes americanus (Walbau m) November 1 978 Is s Technical ircuIar 414 u A1MOsp,, Synopsis of Bioog LW( for the Winter Flounder, i Pseudopleuronectes arnericanus fNTO (Walbaum) Grace Klein-MacPhee November 1 978 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 117 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Richard A. Frank, Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service ational 1rine Fisheries Service (NMFS) does not approve, rec- oinnend or endorse any proprietary product orproprietary material nntioned in this publication. No reference shall be made to NMFS, or ohis publication furnished by NMFS, in any advertising or saies pro- :uion which would indicate or imply that NMFS approves, recommends o ondorses any proprietary product or proprietary material mentioned herein, or which has as its purpose an intent to cause directly or indirectly Lh advertised product to be used or purchased because of this NMFS ublication. CONTENTS Page i Identity i 1.1 Nomenclature i 1.2 Taxonomy 1.3 Morphology 2 2 Distribution 3 2.1 Total area 3 2.2 Differential distribution 4 2.3 Determinants of distribution 4 2.4 Hybridization 5 3 Bionomics and life history 5 3.1 Reproduction 5 3.2 Preadult phase 6 3.3 Adult phase 9 3.4 Nutrition and growth 12 3.5 Behavior 23 4 Population 25 4.1 Structure 25 4.2 Abundance and density 26 4.3 Natality and recruitment 29 4.4 Mortality and morbidity 30 4.5 Dynamics of the population
    [Show full text]
  • Harp Seals, Man and Ice W
    Harp Seals, Man and Ice w. • dab —4 _Ire ...Ob.._ 4r 'fflIOMMILF7 Frontispiece: Moulting patch of harp seals at the "Front" ice, Newfoundland, April 25, 1976. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 114 Harp Seals, Man and Ice D.E. Sergeant Department of Renewable Resources, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, 21, 111 Lakesh ore, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 1C0 Scientific Excellence Resource Protection & Conservation Benefits for Canadians DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS OTTAWA 1991 ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1991 Available in Canada through Associated Bookstores and other booksellers or by mail from Canada Communication Group - Publishing Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada KlA 059 Catalogue No. Fs 41-31/114E ISBN: 0-660-14052-7 ISSN: 0706-6481 DF0/4419 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic , mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K lA 0S9. Printed on recycled paper Think Recycling! Pensez à recycler ! Published by Publié par Fisheries Pêches Mel and Oceans et Océans Communications Direction générale Directorate des communications Ottawa KlA 0E6 Communications Directorate Director, Scientific Publications: John Camp Editorial and Publishing Services: Gerald J. Neville Correct citation for this publication: SERGEANT, D. E. 1991. Harp seals, man and ice. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci.114: 153 p. iv Contents Abstract/Résumé VIII Introduction and Acknowledgements IX Chapter I. Origins and Names 1 Summary 1 Classification and Evolution 1 Past Distribution 3 Vernacular Names and Other Terminology 7 Chapter II.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirant Canal Station, Sandwich, Massachusetts: Renoticed NPDES
    Comments of MIRANT CANAL, LLC on Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. MA0004928 Proposed by EPA New England - Region 1 and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Public Notice No. MA-004-09 January 29, 2009 INTRODUCTION These are comments by the permittee, Mirant Canal, LLC (“Mirant Canal”), on proposed permit conditions for NPDES permit MA0004928 for the Mirant Canal Station in Sandwich, Massachusetts. EPA Region 1 and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (“the Agencies”) issued a final permit effective August 1, 2008. Parts I.A.13.g and h of the permit required the permittee to reduce current levels of entrainment of marine organisms through the facility’s cooling water intake structures to an extent “comparable to what would be achieved by the use of closed-cycle cooling” for all electrical generating units, with the closed-cycle cooling system optimized to maximize cooling water intake flow reductions to the extent practicable in light of site-specific constraints (e.g., restrictions on chloride discharges). Permit No. MA0004928 of August 1, 2008, Part I.A.13.g, p. 16 of 21. By Joint Public Notice No. MA-004-09 of December 12, 2008, the Agencies withdrew Parts I.A.2.f, I.A.7.f, I.A.8, I.A.13.g, and I.A.13.h of the August 1 permit and reproposed them as draft permit conditions for public comment. The Agencies “recognize[d] the possibility that a commenter might wish to comment on additional permit conditions that the commenter believes are inextricably intertwined with the BTA determination for entrainment.” Joint Public Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • Borror's Species Checklist for the Isles of Shoals Archipelago
    Borror’s Species Checklist for the Isles of Shoals Archipelago May 2009 Edition Meg N. Eastwood, Kipp Quinby, Robin Hadlock Seeley, Christine Bogdanowicz, Hal Weeks, and William E. Bemis Borror’s Species Checklist for Shoals Marine Laboratory May 2009 Edition Meg Eastwood, Kipp Quinby, Christine Bogdanowicz, Robin Hadlock Seeley, Hal Weeks, and William E. Bemis Shoals Marine Laboratory Morse Hall, Suite 113 8 College Road Durham, NH, 03824 Send suggestions for improvements to: [email protected] File Name: SML_Checklist_05_2009.docx Last Saved Date: 5/15/09 12:38 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i INTRODUCTION TO 2009 REVISION 1 PREFACE TO THE 1995 EDITION BY ARTHUR C. BORROR 3 CYANOBACTERIA 5 Phylum Cyanophyta 5 Class Cyanophyceae 5 Order Chroococcales 5 Order Nostocales 5 Order Oscillatoriales 5 DINOFLAGELLATES 5 Phylum Pyrrophyta 5 Class Dinophyceae 5 Order Dinophysiales 5 Order Gymnodiniales 5 Order Peridiniales 5 DIATOMS 5 Phylum Bacillariophyta 5 Class Bacillariophyceae 5 Order Bacillariales 5 Class Coscinodiscophyceae 5 Order Achnanthales 5 Order Biddulphiales 5 Order Chaetocerotales 5 Order Coscinodiscales 6 Order Lithodesmidales 6 Order Naviculales 6 Order Rhizosoleniales 6 Order Thalassiosirales 6 Class Fragilariophyceae 6 Order Fragilariales 6 Order Rhabdonematales 6 ALGAE 6 Phylum Heterokontophyta 6 Class Phaeophyceae 6 Order Chordariales 6 Order Desmarestiales 6 Order Dictyosiphonales 6 Order Ectocarpales 7 Order Fucales 7 Order Laminariales 7 Order Scytosiphonales 8 Order Sphacelariales 8 Phylum Rhodophyta 8 Class Rhodophyceae
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sculpins, Sandfishes, and Snailfishes
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 332–352 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny and taxonomy of sculpins, sandfishes, and snailfishes (Perciformes: Cottoidei) with comments on the phylogenetic significance of their early-life-history specializations ⇑ W. Leo Smith a, , Morgan S. Busby b a Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA b Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA article info abstract Article history: Despite recent progress on the higher-level relationships of the Cottoidei and its familial components, Received 24 April 2014 phylogenetic conflict and uncertainty remain within the Cottoidea. We analyzed a dataset composed Revised 27 June 2014 of 4518 molecular (mitochondrial 12S, tRNA-Val, 16S, and cytochrome b and nuclear TMO-4c4, Histone Accepted 30 June 2014 H3, and 28S) and 72 morphological characters for 69 terminals to address cottoid intrarelationships. The Available online 8 July 2014 resulting well-resolved phylogeny was used to produce a revised taxonomy that is consistent with the available molecular and morphological data and recognizes six families: Agonidae, Cottidae, Jordaniidae, Keywords: Psychrolutidae, Rhamphocottidae, and Scorpaenichthyidae. The traditional Agonidae was expanded to Scorpaeniformes include traditional hemitripterids and Hemilepidotus. The traditional Cottidae was restricted to Leptocot- Perciformes Mail-cheeked fishes tus, Trachidermus, and the riverine, lacustrine, and Lake Baikal freshwater cottoids. Jordaniidae (Jordania Reproduction and Paricelinus) was separated from the traditional cottids; Psychrolutidae was expanded from the Larvae traditional grouping to include nearly all traditional marine cottids and the single species of bathy- lutichthyid.
    [Show full text]
  • Demise of the Scorpaeniformes (Actinopterygii: Percomorpha):An Alternative Phylogenetic Hypothesis
    Title Demise of the Scorpaeniformes (Actinopterygii: Percomorpha):An Alternative Phylogenetic Hypothesis Author(s) IMAMURA, Hisashi; YABE, Mamoru Citation 北海道大学水産科学研究彙報, 53(3), 107-128 Issue Date 2002-12 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/21975 Type bulletin (article) File Information 53(3)_P107-128.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Bull. Fish. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. 53(3), 107-128, 2002. Demise of the Scorpaeniformes (Actinopterygii: Percomorpha): An Alternative Phylogenetic Hypothesis Hisashi IMAMURA 1) and Mamoru Y ABE2) (Received 13 September 2002. Accepted 11 October 2(02) Abstract The Scorpaeniformes has been defined by two synapomorphies, the presence of a suborbital stay and a bony parietal structure supporting the sensory canal, but monophyly for the order is still uncertain. Two monophyletic groups of scorpaeniform fishes are currently recognized: a scorpaenoid lineage, including the suborders Scor­ paenoidei and Platycephaloidei; and a cottoid lineage, containing suborders Anoplopomatoidei, Zaniolepidoidei, Hexagrammoidei and Cottoidei. Synapomorphies that support the monophyly of these two lineages, four in the case of the scorpaenoid lineage and 13 for the cottoid lineage, are reviewed and reevaluated. Comparison of these two sets of synapomorphies with those that define percomorph taxa, provides evidence to support the following phylogenetic hypotheses: (I) the scorpaenoid lineage and percoid family Serranidae have a close relationship supported by two synapomorphies; and (2) the cottoid lineage and perciform suborder Zoarcoidei have a sister relationship supported by 13 synapomorphies. The order Scorpaeniformes as currently recognized is thus hypoth­ esized to be polyphyletic. We propose reallocation of both lineages to the order Perciformes, recognizing a suborder Scorpaenoidei to contain the scorpaenoid lineage plus Serranidae, and a suborder Cottoidei closely aligned with the Zoarcoidei to contain the cottoid lineage.
    [Show full text]