Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sculpins, Sandfishes, and Snailfishes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Sculpins, Sandfishes, and Snailfishes Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 332–352 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny and taxonomy of sculpins, sandfishes, and snailfishes (Perciformes: Cottoidei) with comments on the phylogenetic significance of their early-life-history specializations ⇑ W. Leo Smith a, , Morgan S. Busby b a Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA b Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115, USA article info abstract Article history: Despite recent progress on the higher-level relationships of the Cottoidei and its familial components, Received 24 April 2014 phylogenetic conflict and uncertainty remain within the Cottoidea. We analyzed a dataset composed Revised 27 June 2014 of 4518 molecular (mitochondrial 12S, tRNA-Val, 16S, and cytochrome b and nuclear TMO-4c4, Histone Accepted 30 June 2014 H3, and 28S) and 72 morphological characters for 69 terminals to address cottoid intrarelationships. The Available online 8 July 2014 resulting well-resolved phylogeny was used to produce a revised taxonomy that is consistent with the available molecular and morphological data and recognizes six families: Agonidae, Cottidae, Jordaniidae, Keywords: Psychrolutidae, Rhamphocottidae, and Scorpaenichthyidae. The traditional Agonidae was expanded to Scorpaeniformes include traditional hemitripterids and Hemilepidotus. The traditional Cottidae was restricted to Leptocot- Perciformes Mail-cheeked fishes tus, Trachidermus, and the riverine, lacustrine, and Lake Baikal freshwater cottoids. Jordaniidae (Jordania Reproduction and Paricelinus) was separated from the traditional cottids; Psychrolutidae was expanded from the Larvae traditional grouping to include nearly all traditional marine cottids and the single species of bathy- lutichthyid. Rhamphocottidae was expanded to include the traditional ereuniids, and Scorpaenichthyidae separated Scorpaenichthys from the traditional cottids. The importance of early-life-history characters to the resulting phylogeny and taxonomy were highlighted. Ó 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Agonidae (Smith and Wheeler, 2004), Cottocomephoridae (Hunt et al., 1997; Kontula et al., 2003; Kinziger et al., 2005), Cottidae 1.1. Cottoid background (Hunt et al., 1997; Jackson, 2003; Kontula et al., 2003; Smith and Wheeler, 2004; Crow et al., 2004; Kinziger et al., 2005; Smith, The cottoid fishes (sculpins, sandfishes, and snailfishes) are one 2005; Knope, 2013), and Hemitripteridae (Smith and Wheeler, of the largest and most morphologically diverse teleostean subor- 2004; Smith, 2005; Knope, 2013), and they have often recovered ders with more than 825 species classified in 7–20 families (Jordan, the Bathylutichthyidae (Smith, 2005), Comephoridae (Hunt et al., 1923; Washington et al., 1984; Yabe, 1985; Smith and Wheeler, 1997; Kontula et al., 2003; Smith and Wheeler, 2004; Kinziger 2004; Eschmeyer, 2014). Despite progress on cottoid inter- and et al., 2005; Smith, 2005), Cyclopteridae (Jackson, 2003; Smith intrarelationships during the last 30 years following the ground- and Wheeler, 2004), Liparidae (Jackson, 2003; Smith and breaking work of Yabe (1985), problems with their taxonomy Wheeler, 2004), and Psychrolutidae (Jackson, 2003; Smith and remain (Hunt et al., 1997; Jackson, 2003; Kontula et al., 2003; Wheeler, 2004; Smith, 2005; Knope, 2013) nested within the Smith and Wheeler, 2004; Crow et al., 2004; Imamura et al., Cottidae. In short, the limits of the various cottoid families need 2005; Kinziger et al., 2005; Smith, 2005; Knope, 2013). These stud- revision. ies have variously refuted the monophyly of the Abyssocottidae Biologically, the cottoid radiation is perhaps best known for its (Hunt et al., 1997; Kontula et al., 2003; Kinziger et al., 2005), diverse reproductive modes and early-life-history specializations (Breder and Rosen, 1966; Washington et al., 1984; Abe and Munehara, 2009; Muñoz, 2010). Typically, cottoids and their close ⇑ Corresponding author. Address: Biodiversity Institute, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., allies in the Zaniolepididae and Hexagrammidae spawn demersal University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. eggs (Matarese et al., 1989). Further, many sculpins provide paren- E-mail addresses: [email protected] (W.L. Smith), [email protected] tal care or deposit their eggs in concealed spaces or cavities (e.g., (M.S. Busby). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.028 1055-7903/Ó 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. W.L. Smith, M.S. Busby / Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 332–352 333 within the tissues of various invertebrates; Marliave, 1978; 1.3. Cottoid intrarelationships Munehara et al., 1991; Busby et al., 2012). Along with these behav- ioral modifications, cottoids have developed reproductive modifi- Cottoidei is the largest suborder of traditional mail-cheeked cations that allow for specializations ranging from live birth in fishes. This group has approximately 833 species (Eschmeyer, some Lake Baikal sculpins (Comephorus), to copulation, to internal 2014) spread among 139 genera that are currently classified in gametic association with external fertilization in some sculpins, nine families: Agonidae (46 spp.), Cottidae (289 spp.), Cyclopteri- sea ravens, and poachers (e.g., Munehara et al., 1991, 1997; dae (27 spp.), Ereuniidae (3 spp.), Hemitripteridae (8 spp.), Petersen et al., 2004, 2005; Muñoz, 2010). Internal gametic associ- Liparidae (416 spp.), Psychrolutidae (41 spp.), Rhamphocottidae ation involves the joining of eggs and spermatozoa in the ovary (1 sp.), and Trichodontidae (2 spp.). This classification follows with fertilization occurring after the eggs are deposited in seawater Yabe (1985) with the following recommendations by Smith and (Munehara et al., 1991, 1997; Busby et al., 2012). Once fertilized, Wheeler (2004) and/or Smith (2005): inclusion of trichodontids cottoid young often have heavy spination, the development of (previously in the Trachinoidei) in Cottoidei, inclusion of the armor, and precocious development in which flexion occurs within Bathylutichthyidae in Psychrolutidae, and the inclusion of abysso- the egg (Matarese et al., 1989; Busby and Ambrose, 1993; Busby, cottids, comephorids, and cottocomephorids in Cottidae. Regan 1998). These morphological and behavioral modifications are all (1913) first united this cottoid assemblage (less Trichodontidae) strategies that have the potential to increase survivorship of the as the Cottiformes, an order of his Scleroparei. He used the reduc- eggs, larvae, and juveniles. tion in size of the endopterygoid (his mesopterygoid) and interca- lar (his opisthotic) and the loss of the basisphenoid to differentiate 1.2. Cottoid interrelationships this taxon from other mail-cheeked fishes. Later, Jordan (1923), Berg (1940), Matsubara (1943), Quast (1965) and Greenwood Historically, cottoid fishes and their close relatives in the Hexa- et al. (1966) retained this assemblage in their classifications look- grammoidei, Zaniolepidoidei, and Anoplopomatoidei have been ing at various aspects of teleostean phylogeny. classified with the scorpionfishes and allies in the Scorpaeniformes Taranetz (1941) and Bolin (1947) provided the first detailed (Greenwood et al., 1966; Washington et al., 1984; Imamura and morphological surveys of the cottoids. Taranetz (1941) examined Shinohara, 1998; Nelson, 2006). However, recent work (Yabe and species across the Cottoidei and provided a wealth of anatomical Uyeno, 1996; Imamura and Yabe, 2002; Chen et al., 2003; Miya data to justify his classification. Unfortunately, his study suffered et al., 2003; Smith and Wheeler, 2004, 2006; Smith and Craig, from the use of inexplicit methods and a proliferation of family- 2007; Lautredou et al., 2013) has demonstrated that the eelpouts level names that has often complicated cottid taxonomy. Bolin (Zoarcoidei) or sticklebacks (Gasterosteioidei), not the scorpaenoid (1947; Fig. 1B) provided a ‘‘phylogenetic tree’’ of the cottids of lineage, are the closest relatives to the Cottoid Lineage (reviewed in California that utilized his own evolutionary methods. Bolin’s Smith and Wheeler (2004) and Lautredou et al. (2013)). Further, hypothesis shares many similarities with recent phylogenetic Smith and Wheeler (2004), Imamura et al. (2005) and Smith hypotheses (Yabe, 1985; Smith and Wheeler, 2004), but its global (2005) have provided morphological and molecular evidence or taxonomic conclusions were hampered by its restriction to species both to support the placement of the Trichodontidae in an in California and its lack of key cottoid groups (e.g., Agonidae, expanded Cottoidei. Recent studies now consistently recover this Psychrolutidae). expanded Cottoid Lineage among the scorpionfishes and seabasses Washington et al. (1984; Fig. 1C) provided the first phylogenetic (Scorpaenoidei), perches and icefishes (Percoidei), sticklebacks analysis of the Cottoidei. Their study, which briefly summarizes the (Gasterosteioidei) and eelpouts (Zoarcoidei) in a clade that is most hypothesized apomorphic states of 47 characters, was based on an similar to an expanded Scorpaeniformes (Smith and Craig, 2007; unpublished manuscript by Washington and Richardson. This phy- Near et al., 2012, 2013; Lautredou et al., 2013; Wainwright et al., logeny separated their Cyclopteridae (Cyclopteridae + Liparidae) 2012; Betancur-R et al., 2014). from
Recommended publications
  • Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES
    FMP for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area APPENDICES Appendix A History of the Fishery Management Plan ...................................................................... A-1 A.1 Amendments to the FMP ......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B Geographical Coordinates of Areas Described in the Fishery Management Plan ..... B-1 B.1 Management Area, Subareas, and Districts ............................................................................. B-1 B.2 Closed Areas ............................................................................................................................ B-2 B.3 PSC Limitation Zones ........................................................................................................... B-18 Appendix C Summary of the American Fisheries Act and Subtitle II ............................................. C-1 C.1 Summary of the American Fisheries Act (AFA) Management Measures ............................... C-1 C.2 Summary of Amendments to AFA in the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ................ C-2 C.3 American Fisheries Act: Subtitle II Bering Sea Pollock Fishery ............................................ C-4 Appendix D Life History Features and Habitat Requirements of Fishery Management Plan SpeciesD-1 D.1 Walleye pollock (Theragra calcogramma) ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint PINRO/IMR Report on the State of the Barents Sea Ecosystem 2006, with Expected Situation and Considerations for Management
    IMR/PINRO J O S I E N I 2 R T 2007 E R E S P O R T JOINT PINRO/IMR REPORT ON THE STATE OFTHE BARENTS SEA ECOSYSTEM IN 2006 WITH EXPECTED SITUATION AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT Institute of Marine Research - IMR Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography - PINRO This report should be cited as: Stiansen, J.E and A.A. Filin (editors) Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem 2006, with expected situation and considerations for management. IMR/PINRO Joint Report Series No. 2/2007. ISSN 1502-8828. 209 pp. Contributing authors in alphabetical order: A. Aglen, N.A. Anisimova, B. Bogstad, S. Boitsov, P. Budgell, P. Dalpadado, A.V. Dolgov, K.V. Drevetnyak, K. Drinkwater, A.A. Filin, H. Gjøsæter, A.A. Grekov, D. Howell, Å. Høines, R. Ingvaldsen, V.A. Ivshin, E. Johannesen, L.L. Jørgensen, A.L. Karsakov, J. Klungsøyr, T. Knutsen, P.A. Liubin, L.J. Naustvoll, K. Nedreaas, I.E. Manushin, M. Mauritzen, S. Mehl, N.V. Muchina, M.A. Novikov, E. Olsen, E.L. Orlova, G. Ottersen, V.K. Ozhigin, A.P. Pedchenko, N.F. Plotitsina, M. Skogen, O.V. Smirnov, K.M. Sokolov, E.K. Stenevik, J.E. Stiansen, J. Sundet, O.V. Titov, S. Tjelmeland, V.B. Zabavnikov, S.V. Ziryanov, N. Øien, B. Ådlandsvik, S. Aanes, A. Yu. Zhilin Joint PINRO/IMR report on the state of the Barents Sea ecosystem in 2006, with expected situation and considerations for management ISSUE NO.2 Figure 1.1. Illustration of the rich marine life and interactions in the Barents Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Chapter 2. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Inventory By Lyman K. Thorsteinson .............................................................................................................. 23 Chapter 3 Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Species By Milton S. Love, Mancy Elder, Catherine W. Mecklenburg Lyman K. Thorsteinson, and T. Anthony Mecklenburg .................................................................. 41 Pacific and Arctic Lamprey ............................................................................................................. 49 Pacific Lamprey………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………49 Arctic Lamprey…………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….55 Spotted Spiny Dogfish to Bering Cisco ……………………………………..…………………….…………………………60 Spotted Spiney Dogfish………………………………………………………………………………………………..60 Arctic Skate………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….66 Pacific Herring……………………………….……………………………………………………………………………..70 Pond Smelt……………………………………….………………………………………………………………………….78 Pacific Capelin…………………………….………………………………………………………………………………..83 Arctic Smelt………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….91 Chapter 2. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Inventory By Lyman K. Thorsteinson1 Abstract Introduction Several other marine fishery investigations, including A large number of Arctic fisheries studies were efforts for Arctic data recovery and regional analyses of range started following the publication of the Fishes of Alaska extensions, were ongoing concurrent to this study. These (Mecklenburg and others, 2002). Although the results of included
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dean Oz/Μ: ;Z: Date
    The evolutionary history of reproductive strategies in sculpins of the subfamily oligocottinae Item Type Thesis Authors Buser, Thaddaeus J. Download date 26/09/2021 18:39:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/4549 THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE By Thaddaeus J. Buser RECOMMENDED: Dr. Anne Beaudreau Dr. J. Andres Lopez Advisory Committee Chair Dr. Shannon Atkinson Fisheries Division Graduate Program Chair APPROVED: Dr. Michael Castellini ·. John Eichel erger Dean oZ/µ:_;z: Date THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SCULPINS OF THE SUBFAMILY OLIGOCOTTINAE A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Title Page MASTER OF SCIENCE By Thaddaeus J. Buser, B.Sc. Fairbanks, Alaska May 2014 v Abstract The sculpin subfamily Oligocottinae is a group of 17 nearshore species and is noteworthy for the fact that it contains both intertidal and subtidal species, copulating and non- copulating species, and many species with very broad geographic ranges. These factors, as well as the consistency with which the constituent genera have been grouped together historically, make the Oligocottinae an ideal group for the study of the evolution of a reproductive mode known as internal gamete association (IGA), which is unique to sculpins. I conducted a phylogenetic study of the oligocottine sculpins based on an extensive molecular dataset consisting of DNA sequences from eight genomic regions. From the variability present in those sequences, I inferred phylogenetic relationships using parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian inference. Results of these phylogenetic analyses show that some historical taxonomy and classifications require revision to align taxonomy with evolutionary relatedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-On Kai Museum of Natural History
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 35(1), pp. 9–54, March 22, 2009 Historical Fish Specimens Collected from the Tohoku District by the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History Keiichi Matsuura1, Gento Shinohara2 and Masanori Nakae1 1 Collection Center, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3–23–1 Hyakunin-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169–0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fish collection of the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History was transferred to the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo in February 2006. Ninety percent of the fish collection contains specimens collected from the Tohoku District during the period from 1930 to 1933 when natural environments of Japan were in good condition for various groups of fishes. The fish specimens from the Tohoku District were classified into 361 species/subspecies of 273 genera belonging to 131 families of 31 orders. A list of the species is shown with remarks on distribution. Key words: Fish specimens, Saito Ho-on Kai Museum, Tohoku District, inventory. stead of natural sicence. The museum has tried to Introduction keep its activity at the level before the war, but it The Saito Ho-on Kai Museum was established failed to do so because of financial difficulties. In in November 1933 in Sendai City, Miyagi Pre- 2005, the Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural fecture, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • INVERTEBRATE SPECIES in the EASTERN BERING SEA By
    Effects of areas closed to bottom trawling on fish and invertebrate species in the eastern Bering Sea Item Type Thesis Authors Frazier, Christine Ann Download date 01/10/2021 18:30:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/5018 e f f e c t s o f a r e a s c l o s e d t o b o t t o m t r a w l in g o n fish a n d INVERTEBRATE SPECIES IN THE EASTERN BERING SEA By Christine Ann Frazier RECOMMENDED: — . /Vj Advisory Committee Chair Program Head / \ \ APPROVED: M--- —— [)\ Dean, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences • ~7/ . <-/ / f a Dean of the Graduate Sch6oI EFFECTS OF AREAS CLOSED TO BOTTOM TRAWLING ON FISH AND INVERTEBRATE SPECIES IN THE EASTERN BERING SEA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 6 By Christine Ann Frazier, B.A. Fairbanks, Alaska December 2003 UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS ABSTRACT The Bering Sea is a productive ecosystem with some of the most important fisheries in the United States. Constant commercial fishing for groundfish has occurred since the 1960s. The implementation of areas closed to bottom trawling to protect critical habitat for fish or crabs resulted in successful management of these fisheries. The efficacy of these closures on non-target species is unknown. This study determined if differences in abundance, biomass, diversity and evenness of dominant fish and invertebrate species occur among areas open and closed to bottom trawling in the eastern Bering Sea between 1996 and 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV. Appendices
    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Chapter 3f Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Species Structure of Species Account……………………………………………………….2 Bigeye sculpin…………………………………………………………………..…10 Ribbed Sculpin……………………………………………………………………..14 Crested Sculpin……………………………………………………………………..20 Eyeshade Sculpin…………………………………………………………………...25 Polar Sculpin………………………………………………………………………..29 Smoothcheek Sculpin……………………………………………………………….33 Alligatorfish…………………………………………………………………………37 Arctic Alligatorfish………………………………………………………………….43 Chapter 3. Alaska Arctic Marine Fish Species Accounts By Milton S. Love1, Nancy Elder2, Catherine W. Mecklenburg3, Lyman K. Thorsteinson2, and T. Anthony Mecklenburg4 Abstract Although tailored to address the specific needs of BOEM Alaska OCS Region NEPA analysts, the information presented Species accounts provide brief, but thorough descriptions in each species account also is meant to be useful to other about what is known, and not known, about the natural life users including state and Federal fisheries managers and histories and functional roles of marine fishes in the Arctic scientists, commercial and subsistence resource communities, marine ecosystem. Information about human influences on and Arctic residents. Readers interested in obtaining additional traditional names and resource use and availability is limited, information about the taxonomy and identification of marine but what information is available provides important insights Arctic fishes are encouraged to consult theFishes of Alaska about marine ecosystem status and condition, seasonal patterns
    [Show full text]
  • Full Document (Pdf 2154
    White Paper Research Project T1803, Task 35 Overwater Whitepaper OVERWATER STRUCTURES: MARINE ISSUES by Barbara Nightingale Charles A. Simenstad Research Assistant Senior Fisheries Biologist School of Marine Affairs School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 University District Building 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 Washington State Department of Transportation Technical Monitor Patricia Lynch Regulatory and Compliance Program Manager, Environmental Affairs Prepared for Washington State Transportation Commission Department of Transportation and in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration May 2001 WHITE PAPER Overwater Structures: Marine Issues Submitted to Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation Prepared by Barbara Nightingale and Charles Simenstad University of Washington Wetland Ecosystem Team School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences May 9, 2001 Note: Some pages in this document have been purposefully skipped or blank pages inserted so that this document will copy correctly when duplexed. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. WA-RD 508.1 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE Overwater Structures: Marine Issues May 2001 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Barbara Nightingale, Charles Simenstad 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC) University of Washington, Box 354802 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. University District Building; 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 535 Agreement T1803, Task 35 Seattle, Washington 98105-4631 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California
    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Identification of Larval and Earlyjuvenile Poachers Fronn
    NOAA Technical Report NMFS 137 May 1998 Guide to the Identification of Larval and EarlyJuvenile Poachers (Sco~aendfornnes:~onddae) fronn the Northeastern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea Morgan S. Busby u.s. Department ofCommerce U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE WILLIAM M. DALEY NOAA SECRETARY National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical D.James Baker Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere Reports NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service Technical Reports of the Fishery Bulletin Rolland A. Schmitten Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Scientific Editor Dr.John B. Pearce Northeast Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 166 Water Street Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1097 Editorial Conunittee Dr. Andrew E. Dizon National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Linda L. Jones National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Richard D. Methot Nauonal Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Theodore W. Pietsch University of Washington Dr. Joseph E. Powers National Marine Fisheries Service Dr. Titn D. Stnith National Marine Fisheries Service Managing Editor Shelley E. Arenas Scientific Publications Office National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA 7600 Sand Point Way N.E. Seattle, Washington 98115-0070 The NOAA Technical Report NMFS (ISSN 0892-8908) series is published by the Scientific Publications Office, Na­ tional Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way N.E., Seattle, WA The NOAA Technual Report NMFS series of the Fishery Bulletin carries peer-re­ 98115-0070. viewed, lengthy original research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora The Secretary of Commerce has de­ and fauna studies, and data intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, termined that the publication of this se­ engineering, and economics. The series was established in 1983 to replace two ries is necessary in the transaction of the subcategories of the Technical Report series: "Special Scientific Report-Fisher­ public business required by law of tllis ies" and "Circular." Copies of the NOAA Technual Report NMFS are available free Department.
    [Show full text]