DOCSLIB.ORG

PETER ABELARD* Principal Works Carmen Ad Astralabium. Edited By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PETER ABELARD* Principal Works Carmen Ad Astralabium. Edited By c Peter King, in The Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 115 (1992): 3–14. PETER ABELARD* Principal Works Carmen ad Astralabium. Edited by J. M. A. Rubingh-Bosscher in Peter Abelard: Carmen ad Astralabium, a Critical Edition. Groningen: phil. diss. Rijksuniversiteit 1987. Collationes a. k. a. Dialogus inter Philosophum, Iudaeum, et Christianum. Edited by Giovanni Orlandi, with introduction, translation, and notes by John Marenbon, in Peter Abelard: Collationes, Oxford University Press 2001. Commentaria in Epistolam Pauli ad Romanos. Edited by Eligius M. Buy- taert in Petri Abaelardi opera theologica. Corpus christianorum (con- tinuatio mediaevalis) Vol. 11. Brepols: Turnholt 1969, 389–340. Dialectica. Edited by L. M. De Rijk in Petrus Abaelardus: Dialectica, Assen: Van Gorcum 1970 (second edition). Epistolae: Ep. 1 edited by Monfrin (see the entry below for the Historia calamitatum); Epp. 2–5 edited by J. T. Muckle, Mediaeval Studies 15 (1953) 68–94; Epp. 6–7, edited by J. T. Muckle, Mediaeval Studies 17 (1955) 241-281; Ep. 8, edited by T. P. McLaughlin, Mediaeval Studies 18 (1956) 242–297; Epp. 9–14 edited by E. R. Smits in Peter Abelard: Letters IX–XIV, Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit 1983; Ep. 15 edited by Josef Reiners, BGPTM 8 (1910) 63–80; Ep. 16, edited by Victor Cousin and Charles Jourdain, Petri Abaelardi opera Vol. 1 (Paris 1849) 703– 707, corrected against Van Den Eynde, Antonianum 38 (1963) 219; Ep. 17, edited by Charles Burnett, Mittellateinisch Jahrbuch 21 (1986), 152–155; Apologia contra Bernardum (Ne iuxta Boethianum), edited by Eligius M. Buytaert in CCCM 12 359–368; Epistola contra Bernar- dum edited by Raymond Klibansky, Medieval and Renaissance Studies 5 (1961), 1–27; Confessio fidei “Uniuersis” edited by Charles Burnett, Mediaeval Studies 48 (1986), 182–189. Ethica seu Scito teipsum. Edited by R. M. Ilgner in Petri Abaelardi opera theologica. Corpus christianorum (continuatio mediaevalis) Vol. 190. Brepols: Turnholt 2001. Expositio orationis dominicae. Edited by Charles Burnett, “Expositio ora- tionis dominicae ‘Multorum legimus orationes”’ in R´evue Benedictine 95 (1985) 60–72. Expositio symboli Apostolorum. Edited by Victor Cousin and Charles Jour- dain, Petri Abaelardi opera Vol. 1 (Paris 1849) 603–615. * The list of Abelard’s works and English translations has been updated (July 2004); the rest of the article remains the same as it was when it was published in 1992. A more philosophical overview can be found online in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/abelard/. –1– 2 PETER ABELARD Expositio fidei in symbolum Athanasii. Edited by Victor Cousin and Charles Jourdain, Petri Abaelardi opera Vol. 1 (Paris 1849) 615–617. Hexa¨emeron. Edited by Mary F. Romig in A Critical Edition of Peter Abelard’s “Expositio in Hexa¨emeron”, Doctoral dissertation in His- tory, University of Southern California, January 1981. Historia calamitatum. Edited by Jacques Monfrin in Ab´elard, Historia cala- mitatum: texte et commentaires, J. Vrin: Paris 1974 (fourth edition), 62–109. Hymnarius Paraclitensis. Edited by Chrysogonus Waddell in Hymn Collec- tions from the Paraclete, Vol. 2. Trappist Monastery, Ky.: Gethsemani Abbey (Cistercian Liturgy series) 1987. Introductiones parvulorum. Edited by Mario Dal Pra in Pietro Abelardo: Scritti di logica, Firenze 1969 (second edition). Logica ‘ingredientibus’. LI 1: Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge. Edited by Bernhard Geyer in Beitr¨age zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 21 (1). Aschendorff: Munster 1919. LI 2: Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories. Edited by Bernhard Geyer in Beitr¨age zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelal- ters 21 (2). Aschendorff: Munster 1921. LI 3: Commentary on Aristo- tle’s De interpretatione. Edited by Klaus Jacobi and Christian Strub, forthcoming in the Corpus christianorum continuatio medievalis. LI 7: Commentary on Boethius’s De topicis differentiis. Edited by Mario Dal Pra in Pietro Abelardo: Scritti di logica, Firenze 1969 (second edition). Logica ‘nostrorum petitioni sociorum’. Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge. Edited by Bernhard Geyer in Beitr¨age zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 21 (4). Aschendorff: Munster 1933. Planctus. Planctus 1, 4, 6: edited by Peter Dronke, Poetic Individality in the Middle Ages (London 1986). Planctus 2, 5: edited by Giuseppe Vecchi, Pietro Abelardo, I “Planctus” (Modena 1951). Planctus 3: edited by Wolfram von den Steinen, Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 4 (1967), 122– 144. There are several modern recordings. Problemata Helo¨ıssae cum Petri Abaelardi solutionibus. Edited by Vic- tor Cousin and Charles Jourdain, Petri Abaelardi opera, Vol. 1 (Paris 1849): 237–294. Sententiae secundum Magistrum Petrum. Edited by Lorenzo Minio-Paluello in Twelfth-Century Logic: Texts and Studies, Vol. 2 (Abaelardiana inedita), Roma 1958. Sermones. Edited by Paola De Santis in I sermoni di Abelardo per le monache del Paracleto, Leuven University Press 2002. (Mediaevalia Lovaniensa ser. 1, studia 31.) Sic et non. Edited by Blanche Boyer and Richard McKeon in Peter Abailard: Sic et Non. A Critical Edition. University of Chicago Press 1977. Soliloquium. Edited by Charles Burnett in “Peter Abelard’s ‘Soliloquium’: A Critical Edition” in Studi Medievali 25 (1984), 857–894. c Peter King, in The Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 115 (1992): 3–14. LIFE 3 Theologia ‘summi boni’. Edited by Eligius M. Buytaert and Constant Mews in Petri Abaelardi opera theologica. Corpus christianorum (continuatio mediaevalis). Vol. 13. Brepols: Turnholt 1987. Theologia christiana. Edited by Eligius M. Buytaert in Petri Abaelardi opera theologica. Corpus christianorum (continuatio mediaevalis). Vol. 12. Brepols: Turnholt 1969. Theologia ‘scholarium’. Edited by Eligius M. Buytaert and Constant Mews in Petri Abaelardi opera theologica. Corpus christianorum (continuatio mediaevalis). Vol. 13. Brepols: Turnholt 1987. Tractatus de intellectibus. Edited by Patrick Morin in Ab´elard: Des intel- lections. Paris: J. Vrin 1994. Works in English Translation Fairweather, E. R. (1995) A Scholastic Miscellany. Westminster: John Knox Press. Excerpt from Abelard ’s commentary on Romans. King, Peter. (1982) Peter Abailard and the Problem of Universals in the Twelfth Century. Doctoral dissertation in Philosophy, Princeton Uni- versity. Vol. 2 contains a complete translation of Abelard’s Tractatus de intellectibus. Luscombe, David. (1971) Ethics. Oxford University Press. Complete trans- lation of Abelard’s Ethica. Marenbon, John. (2001) Peter Abelard: Collationes. Complete translation of Abelard’s Dialogus. McCallum, James Ramsay. (1948) Abelard ’s Christian Theology. Oxford: Blackwell 1948. Includes substantial selections from Abelard ’s The- ologia christiana. Minnis, A. and Scott, A. B. eds. (1988) Medieval Literary Theory and Crit- icism 1100–1375. Oxford University Press. Includes Abelard ’s preface to the Sic et non. Payer, Pierre. (1979) Peter Abelard: A Dialogue of a Philosopher with a Jew and a Christian. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies Publications. Radice, Elizabeth. (1974) The Letters of Abelard and Heloise. New York: Penguin Books. Spade, Paul. (1994). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Abelard’s discussion of the problem of universals from his Logica ‘ingredientibus’. Spade, Paul. (1995) Peter Abelard: Ethical Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Complete translations of Abelard ’s Ethics and Dialogue. Tweedale, Martin and Bosley, Richard. (1997) Issues in Medieval Philoso- phy. Broadview Press. Includes selections from Abelard on foreknowl- edge, universals, and ethics. c Peter King, in The Dictionary of Literary Biography Vol. 115 (1992): 3–14. 4 PETER ABELARD Life Peter Abelard was the teacher of his generation: preeminent as a philoso- pher, theologian, poet, and musician, he captured the imagination of almost all with whom he came into contact. His fame as a teacher was unequalled; students travelled from all over Europe to hear him speak, crowds of ordi- nary people attended his public lectures wherever he went, and it has been said that he was indirectly responsible for the founding of the University of Paris by creating a permanent ‘deposit’ of students in the city. As a philosopher, he brought the investigation of the “old logic”(logica vetus) to its heights; as a theologian, he championed the use of reason and intellect in matters of faith, putting the word theology into use with the meaning it still has today. In philosophy and theology, Abelard’s constant and unremitting use of the tools of logic or ‘dialectic’—argument, objection, example, coun- terexample, and the like—helped define the Scholastic method, of which an early example is his Sic et non [“Pro and Con” ca. 1117–1128]. As a poet and musician, Abelard was renowned for his verses, both secular and sacred, composed in the vernacular and in Latin. He is responsible for some of the earliest extant pieces of “authored” music. Abelard’s natural talents alone were formidable. Combined with his quick tongue, undeniable brilliance, sharp wit, dialectical acumen, encyclopædic memory, and flavoured with a large dose of arrogance, the force of his personality impressed itself vividly on all his contemporaries. Even his critics and detractors (whom Abelard always referred to as his “enemies”) admitted that he never lost an argu- ment, and only those who avoided debating him could ever gain the upper hand over him.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forerunners to the Reformation
    { Lecture 19 } FORERUNNERS TO THE REFORMATION * * * * * Long before Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the Wittenberg Door, there were those who recognized the corruption within the Roman Catholic Church and the need for major reform. Generally speaking, these men attempted to stay within the Catholic system rather than attempting to leave the church (as the Protestant Reformers later would do). The Waldensians (1184–1500s) • Waldo (or Peter Waldo) lived from around 1140 to 1218. He was a merchant from Lyon. But after being influenced by the story of the fourth-century Alexius (a Christian who sold all of his belongings in devotion to Christ), Waldo sold his belongings and began a life of radical service to Christ. • By 1170, Waldo had surrounded himself with a group of followers known as the Poor Men of Lyon, though they would later become known as Waldensians. • The movement was denied official sanction by the Roman Catholic Church (and condemned at the Third Lateran Council in 1179). Waldo was excommunicated by Pope Lucius III in 1184, and the movement was again condemned at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. • Waldensians were, therefore, persecuted by the Roman Catholics as heretics. However, the movement survived (even down to the present) though the Waldensians were often forced into hiding in the Alps. • The Waldensian movement was characterized by (1) voluntary poverty (though Waldo taught that salvation was not restricted to those who gave up their wealth), (2) lay preaching, and (2) the authority of the Bible (translated in the language of the people) over any other authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Events of the Reformation Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution
    May 20, 2018 Events of the Reformation Protestants and Roman Catholics agree on first 5 centuries. What changed? Why did some in the Church want reform by the 16th century? Outline Why the Reformation? 1. Church becomes powerful institution. 2. Additional teaching and practices were added. 3. People begin questioning the Church. 4. Martin Luther’s protest. Part 1 – Church Becomes Powerful Institution Evidence of Rome’s power grab • In 2nd century we see bishops over regions; people looked to them for guidance. • Around 195AD there was dispute over which day to celebrate Passover (14th Nissan vs. Sunday) • Polycarp said 14th Nissan, but now Victor (Bishop of Rome) liked Sunday. • A council was convened to decide, and they decided on Sunday. • But bishops of Asia continued the Passover on 14th Nissan. • Eusebius wrote what happened next: “Thereupon Victor, who presided over the church at Rome, immediately attempted to cut off from the common unity the parishes of all Asia, with the churches that agreed with them, as heterodox [heretics]; and he wrote letters and declared all the brethren there wholly excommunicate.” (Eus., Hist. eccl. 5.24.9) Everyone started looking to Rome to settle disputes • Rome was always ending up on the winning side in their handling of controversial topics. 1 • So through a combination of the fact that Rome was the most important city in the ancient world and its bishop was always right doctrinally then everyone started looking to Rome. • So Rome took that power and developed it into the Roman Catholic Church by the 600s. Church granted power to rule • Constantine gave the pope power to rule over Italy, Jerusalem, Constantinople and Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Well-Trained Theologian
    THE WELL-TRAINED THEOLOGIAN essential texts for retrieving classical Christian theology part 1, patristic and medieval Matthew Barrett Credo 2020 Over the last several decades, evangelicalism’s lack of roots has become conspicuous. Many years ago, I experienced this firsthand as a university student and eventually as a seminary student. Books from the past were segregated to classes in church history, while classes on hermeneutics and biblical exegesis carried on as if no one had exegeted scripture prior to the Enlightenment. Sometimes systematics suffered from the same literary amnesia. When I first entered the PhD system, eager to continue my theological quest, I was given a long list of books to read just like every other student. Looking back, I now see what I could not see at the time: out of eight pages of bibliography, you could count on one hand the books that predated the modern era. I have taught at Christian colleges and seminaries on both sides of the Atlantic for a decade now and I can say, in all honesty, not much has changed. As students begin courses and prepare for seminars, as pastors are trained for the pulpit, they are not required to engage the wisdom of the ancient past firsthand or what many have labelled classical Christianity. Such chronological snobbery, as C. S. Lewis called it, is pervasive. The consequences of such a lopsided diet are now starting to unveil themselves. Recent controversy over the Trinity, for example, has manifested our ignorance of doctrines like eternal generation, a doctrine not only basic to biblical interpretation and Christian orthodoxy for almost two centuries, but a doctrine fundamental to the church’s Christian identity.
    [Show full text]
  • “Theology” from the Presocratics to Peter Abelard: Philosophy and Science
    Section Four PHILOSOPHY AND COSMOLOGY IN PERSONS ФилосоФия и Космология в лицах The word “Theology” from the Presocratics to Peter Abelard: Philosophy and Science. Some Remarks Mauro Ferrante1 — PhD Università degli Studi “Niccolò Cusano” — Telematica Roma (Rome, Italy) E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct, through the analysis of some key moments, the evolution of the term “theology” within the Western philosophical thought. Starting with the first formulation by the Presocratics, the study takes into consideration both the first attestation of the term by Plato (in the second book of the Republic) and the role it plays in Aristotle’s works (Metaphysics). In its second part, the paper considers the importance of the term “theology” in the Latin world, through the study of the Augustine’s critic against the greek thinkers, which will lead to a further development in the Middle Ages. The point of arrival is Peter Abelard, who formulated a concept of “theology” conceived as a science. At first, the term was tied to a pagan conception of society and was devoid of any scientific connotation. With the advent of Christianity, it begins to take on an universalistic character connected with the concept of an absolute truth. It is here pointed out, through all of these antecedents, how, in the Middle Ages, when the “theology” became an autonomous science and responds to its own laws, how it is assumed and used as an instrument to manage both science and truth. Thanks to the contributions of the ancient philosophers, developed by medieval thinkers, it was possible to subsequently use the term “theology” also in a political sense.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Christian Church*
    a Grace Notes course History of the Christian Church VOLUME 5. The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 By Philip Schaff CH512 Chapter 12: Scholastic and Mystic Theology History of the Christian Church Volume 5 The Middle Ages, the Papal Theocracy in Conflict with the Secular Power from Gregory VII to Boniface VIII, AD 1049 to 1294 CH512 Table of Contents Chapter 12. Scholastic and Mystic Theology .................................................................................2 5.95. Literature and General Introduction ......................................................................................... 2 5.96. Sources and Development of Scholasticism .............................................................................. 4 5.97. Realism and Nominalism ........................................................................................................... 6 5.98. Anselm of Canterbury ................................................................................................................ 7 5.99. Peter Abelard ........................................................................................................................... 12 5.100. Abelard’s Teachings and Theology ........................................................................................ 18 5.101. Younger Contemporaries of Abelard ..................................................................................... 21 5.102. Peter the Lombard and the Summists
    [Show full text]
  • THE SCHOLASTIC PERIOD Beatus Rhenanus, a Close Friend Of
    CHAPTER THREE MEDIEVAL HISTORY: THE SCHOLASTIC PERIOD Beatus Rhenanus, a close friend of Erasmus and the most famous humanist historian of Germany, dated the rise of scholasticism (and hence the decay of theology) at “around the year of grace 1140”, when men like Peter Lombard (1095/1100–1160), Peter Abelard (1079–1142), and Gratian († c. 1150) were active.1 Erasmus, who cared relatively little about chronology, never gave such a precise indication, but one may assume that he did not disagree with Beatus, whose views may have directly influenced him. As we have seen, he believed that the fervour of the gospel had grown cold among most Christians during the previous four hundred years.2 Although his statement pertained to public morality rather than to theology,3 other passages from his work confirm that in Erasmus’ eyes those four centuries represented the age of scholasticism. In his biography of Jerome, he complained that for the scholastics nobody “who had lived before the last four hundred years” was a theologian,4 and in a work against Noël Bédier he pointed to a tradition of “four hun- dred years during which scholastic theology, gravely burdened by the decrees of the philosophers and the contrivances of the sophists, has wielded its reign”.5 In one other case he assigned to scholasti- cism a tradition of three centuries.6 Thus by the second half of the twelfth century, Western Christendom, in Erasmus’ conception, had entered the most distressing phase of its history, even though the 1 See John F. D’Amico, “Beatus Rhenanus, Tertullian and the Reformation: A Humanist’s Critique of Scholasticism”, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte 71 (1980), 37–63 esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Reformation Beginnings
    UPON THIS ROCK A STUDY OF THE HISTORY OF CHRIST’S CHURCH UPON THIS ROCK A STUDY OF LESSON 6: THE HISTORY OF CHRIST’S REFORMATION CHURCH BEGINNINGS CAUTION: CHURCH HISTORY Robert Robinson (published 1792) “On the caution necessary to a reader of ecclesiastical history: It is an old observation, that of all history, ecclesiastical is the worst written. Such a history, beginning with Jesus, & proceeding through successive ages with His disciples, ought to exhibit bright example of virtue. It should show a succession of men contending (if contend they must) for something worth contending for. Instead of this, every century proceeds from worse to worse, each opening with deplorable scenes of all the ills that afflict society… CAUTION: CHURCH HISTORY Robert Robinson (published 1792) “Want of precision in ecclesiastical history is one chief cause of the gloom that involves the divine religion of Jesus, & while this confusion remains, a cheat is put on the reader, & a long time elapses ere he discovers that what had been given him for a history of good men, the very disciples of the Son of God, was a history of counterfeits, disciples of the world, & regulated only by the maxims of it. Ecclesiastical history may be so written as to serve the interests of parties while the disguise remains: But to serve the cause of truth & virtue at large the covering must be taken off, for either that or the cause must go to decay.” CAUTION: CHURCH HISTORY FW Mattox “From the beginning of the development of the Roman hierarchy there was opposition both to organization & to the changes which came about in doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • PHIL3172: MEDIEVAL WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS 2013-2014 Venue: ELB 203 (利黃瑤璧樓 203) Time: Wednesdays 9:30 - 12:15 - Teacher: Louis Ha
    PHIL3172: MEDIEVAL WESTERN PHILOSOPHERS 2013-2014 Venue: ELB 203 (利黃瑤璧樓 203) Time: Wednesdays 9:30 - 12:15 - Teacher: Louis Ha. email Middle Ages in the West lasted for more than a millennium after the downfall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th Century. During this period people lived under certain unity and uniformity commanded by the strong influence of Christianity and the common acceptance of the importance of faith in one’s daily life. This course aims at presenting the thoughts of those centuries developed in serenity and piety together with the breakthroughs made by individual philosophers such as Boethius, Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard, Thomas Aquinas and Duns Scotus. Modern people, though live in a technologically advanced era, are quite often facing almost the same challenges of their Medieval fellow human-beings. The course intends to provide students with instances for a more general comprehension of human reality through the study on the problems of faith and understanding. Internal website 8 January, 2014 *INTRODUCTION The medieval Europe: the time, the place and the people The two themes and five philosophers chosen for the course Class dynamics - a) oral report by students, b) lecture by teacher, c) discussion in small groups, d) points of reflections (at least two) Assessment: attendance 10%; book report 20%(2000 words, before/on 12 Oct.); presentation 30%; term paper 40%(5000 words, before/on 23 Nov.) * The spirit of mediæval philosophy / by Étienne Gilson. * 中世紀哲學精神/ Etienne Gilson 著 ; 沈淸松譯. * [Chapters 18,19,20] 15 January, 2014 *CONSOLATIO PHILOSOPHIAE, Book V by Boethius (480-524) Boethius 22 January, 2014 *DE DIVISIONE NATURAE, Book II.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories and Images of Creation in Northern Europe in the Twelfth Century
    Art History ISSN 0141-6790 Vol. 22 No. 1 March 1999 pp. 3-55 In the Beginning: Theories and images of creation in Northern Europe in the twelfth century Conrad Rudolph 'Logic has made me hated by the world!' So Peter Abelard thought and wrote to his former lover, the brilliant Heloise, in probably his last letter to her before his death in 1142, after having been virtually driven from Paris by Bernard of Clairvaux, the austere Cistercian mystic and perhaps the most powerful ecclesiastical politician of Western Europe.1 Characteristically for Abelard in matters of self-conception, he was exaggerating. Logic had made him hated not by the world but by only a portion of it. While this was certainly an influential portion and one that had almost succeeded in destroying him, it could never do so entirely. In fact, logic had made Abelard 'the Socrates of the Gauls, the great Plato of the West, our Aristotle ... the prince of scholars'2- and this, this great fame and the almost unprecedented influence that accompanied it, was as much the problem as logic was. In a word, Abelard had been caught up in the politics of theology. The time was one of great theological inquiry, challenging, as it did, the very authority of divine revelation on the most fundamental level, and at a moment when both interest in secular learning and the number of students were dramatically increasing - all factors that can hardly be over-emphasized. But for certain elements within the Church, more still was at stake. And this was nothing less than a perceived assault on one of the basic underpinnings of the complex relationship between religion, theology, society and political power.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dialogue Between a Cluniac and a Cistercian
    164 THE JOURNAL OF THEOLOGICAL STUDIES Neque enim coniunctionem suscepisset illam nisi prius immaculatus factus fuisset, ut sic condeceat illius unitatem .... Christum iustificatum et immaculatum factum uirtute sancti Spiritus (sicut beatus Paulus modo quidem <licit quod iustijicatus est in Spiritu [1 Tim. iii 16], modo uero quiper Spiritum aeternum immaculatum se obtulit Deo [Heh. ix 14]) mori quidem fecit secundum legem hominum, utpote autem impeccabilem uirtute sancti Spiritus factum resuscitauit a mortuis : c. Apo!!. iii 7 Dicant igitur no bis [ sc. the Apollinarians] ... si pro sensu [in 2 Th. ii 2 sensus = vo6s] Domino Christo, qui est secundum carnem, deitas facta esset, sicut dicunt, quid sancti Spiritus cooperatione ad haec Christus indige­ bat? Nee enim Unigeniti deitas Spiritu indigebat ad iustificationem sed nunc unctum esse <licit ipsum Spiritu et habitasse in eo Spiritum ... et doctrinam inde ipsum accepisse et uirtutem, et inde impetrasse iustificationem et inde immaculatum factum esse. F. E. BRIGHTMAN. A DIALOGUE BETWEEN A CLUNIAC AND A CISTERCIAN BEFORE the historic controversy between the Cluniacs and the Cistercians finally lost its immediately practical interest, as it began to do not very long after the great protagonists had passed, St Bernard in n53 and Peter the Venerable in u58, it appears to have taken for a while a somewhat academic shape, as of a question gravely and dis­ passionately debated in the schools. It lost, in a measure, the verve of aggressive partizanship and became rather restrained, detached, almost Platonically detached. How far the Dialogue between a Cluniac and a Cistercian monk, given by Martene and Durand in their Thesaurus,1 is.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Life of Bernard of Clairvaux
    CISTERCIAN FATHERS SERIES: NUMBER SEVENTY-SIX THE FIRST LIFE OF BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX CISTERCIAN FATHERS SERIES: NUMBER SEVENTY-SIX The First Life of Bernard of Clairvaux by William of Saint-Thierry, Arnold of Bonneval, and Geoffrey of Auxerre Translated by Hilary Costello, OCSO Cistercian Publications www.cistercianpublications.org LITURGICAL PRESS Collegeville, Minnesota www.litpress.org A Cistercian Publications title published by Liturgical Press Cistercian Publications Editorial Offices 161 Grosvenor Street Athens, Ohio 45701 www.cistercianpublications.org In the absence of a critical edition of Recension B of the Vita Prima Sancti Bernardi, this translation is based on Mount Saint Bernard MS 1, with section numbers inserted from the critical edition of Recension A (Vita Prima Sancti Bernardi Claraevallis Abbatis, Liber Primus, ed. Paul Verdeyen, CCCM 89B [Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2011]). Scripture texts in this work are translated by the translator of the text. The image of Saint Bernard on the cover is a miniature from Mount Saint Bernard Abbey, fol. 1, reprinted with permission from Mount Saint Bernard Abbey. © 2015 by Order of Saint Benedict, Collegeville, Minnesota. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, microfilm, microfiche, mechanical recording, photocopying, translation, or any other means, known or yet unknown, for any purpose except brief quotations in reviews, without the previous written permission of Liturgical Press, Saint John’s Abbey, PO Box 7500, College- ville, Minnesota 56321-7500. Printed in the United States of America. 123456789 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Vita prima Sancti Bernardi. English The first life of Bernard of Clairvaux / by William of Saint-Thierry, Arnold of Bonneval, and Geoffrey of Auxerre ; translated by Hilary Costello, OCSO.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter III PONTIUS and ANACLET Shortly Before the Upheaval of The
    Chapter III PONTIUS AND ANACLET Shortly before the upheaval of the papal schism a dispute erupted at Cluny, which rocked the relatively peaceful world of Western monasti- cism, and deeply involved the papacy. The conflict centered around the abbot, Pontius, and ended in a violent clash between him and his succes­ sor, Peter the Venerable. Some scholars see the dispute as part of the first rumblings of the papal schism. They interpret it as the northern counter­ part of the division within the curia, and believe that it delineates the ideological guidelines of each of the papal contenders in the schism. To them the evidence is very strong that Anaclet was ideologically associated with Pontius, and Innocent with Peter. Anaclet had taken orders at Cluny under Pontius, and even though the abbot had died by 1130, these schol­ ars believe that his followers must have supported Anaclet because they shared a common monastic philosophy. This probability appears to be strengthened by Peter the Venerable's vehement rejection of Anaclet, and his unstinting support of Innocent. According to this perspective, one has only to observe the values upheld by each abbot to know the religious philosophy of the two cardi­ nals vying for the papacy.1 Here the differences appear to be clear cut. While the advocates of this view believe that Pontius permitted the stan­ dards of Cluny to degenerate, they hold that Peter the Venerable restored, and further tightened discipline under pressure from the Cistercians.2 Accordingly, when St. Bernard harshly criticized the excesses of Cluny, he was referring to the reign of Pontius rather than the rule of Peter the Venerable.3 Therefore, even though he was a member of an older Benedictine house, Peter is seen to have represented the monastery's most enlightened tendencies, and his support of Innocent is viewed as a compelling argument that Innocent also extolled these same principles.
    [Show full text]