New Metropolitan Living and the Skycraper in a European City 1. Book Chapter/Part Chapter Ctbuh.Org/Papers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ctbuh.org/papers Title: New Metropolitan Living and the Skycraper in a European City Author: Jan Klerks, Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat Subject: Urban Design Keyword: Urban Design Publication Date: 2005 Original Publication: CTBUH 2005 7th World Congress, New York Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Jan Klerks Jan Klerks Dutch Council on Tall Buildings Jan Klerks, originally from Rotterdam in The Netherlands, is the executive secretary of the Dutch Council on Tall Buildings. This foundation aims to create network and knowledge among professionals involved in high-rise development and construction in The Netherlands by organizing conferences and study trips and publishing a high-rise-centered newsletter. In this position, Mr. Klerks has represented the foundation and its goals on numer- ous occasions by giving lectures and interviews and writing articles and columns in a variety of magazines. His personal focus is on high-rise living. Mr. Klerks is also chairman of the Rotterdam Skyscraper Foundation which tries to create and embody local enthusiasm for the skyscraper by publishing books and representing skyscraper development on a local level. Recently plans for a Rotterdam Skyscraper Festival have been initiated, and the event is planned for 2007. He also created and administers the SkyscraperCity.com Web site, the world’s largest Internet community about skyscrapers, cities, architecture, and other urban-related issues. ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ New Metropolitan Living and the Skycraper in a European City A relatively small but definite percentage of the city population prefers a high-metropolitan life style, some- thing being expressed by modern skyscraper living. It’s only until recently that this niche market has started to take shape in Europe, but merely on an incidental basis and only in a few cities. The typical European urban context can only partly be used as an argument to explain that theories of urban density and the classical promise of the skyscraper do not seem to apply to the modern residential skyscraper in Europe. This presentation will look at the historic and current European residential skyscraper developments as the embodiment of new metropolitan living. It will address related issues dealing with high-rise zoning, laws and regulation, the definition of urbanity, population typologies based on residential preferences, past and present inner city development, and especially the marketing and branding of metropolitan living, all within a European context. The main goal is to create awareness of the potential of modern metropolitan living in European cities. Findings will be accompanied by examples and case studies in Frankfurt, Germany; London; and the Dutch cities of Rotterdam and Amsterdam. New Metropolitan Living and the Skyscraper in a European City Jan Klerks Stichting Hoogbouw / Dutch Council on Tall Buildings Postbus 51102 3007 CG Rotterdam, The Netherlands 010 484 1119 [email protected] member CTBUH Abstract Particularly in Europe, the skyscraper is not a typical shape in which metropolitan living comes. Even in cities with no characteristic historical background, skyscrapers are incidents. Rotterdam is an example of a city in which skyscraper living has been embraced as a modern way of shaping new housing markets and creating a modern image. As such, a skyscraper isn’t the result of existing urbanity, but it tries to appeal to the image of modern urbanity and as such, trying to recreate a modern version of it. This paper wants to show that there is a modest but certain market for skyscraper living in Europe and that with proper guidance and ambition, this market could be successfully developed into a new way of creating modern metropolitan living and shaping cityscape ambition in Europe. keywords: high-rise living, high-rise policy, urbanity, city branding 1 NEW METROPOLITAN LIVING IN EUROPE The Dutch word for skyscraper is ‘wolkenkrabber’. Sadly it is hardly being used. I don’t think anyone has ever actually said it out loud that he or she ‘lives in a skyscraper’, or that someone is ‘fond of skyscrapers’. Some would say that’s because The Netherlands wouldn’t have them. At times the unofficial but magic looking number of 500 feet is being used as a threshold value weather a tall building is a skyscraper or not, and the current tallest just happens to be 498 feet. Off course height isn’t everything. Slenderness, architectural appearance, ambition, location, use and urban mass don’t seem to count when it comes to naming the different sizes and shapes in which high-rise comes. Looking at the numbers one can say that Europe never has developed a taste for skyscraper living, and it’s only as of late that in some European cities, residential skyscrapers start to appear. At the moment Moscow leads the race with the 264 meter tall Triumph-Palace, followed by the Vorobiovy Gory Tower II (188 meter), Edelweiss (176 meter) and Aliye Parusa 2 (176 meter) all in the current top 100 of tallest residentials in the world. Other tall ones are not located in cities where you might expect them, such as the capital cities of London, Paris, Madrid and Berlin. The Swedish province town of Malmö, home of Santiago Calatrava’s 190 meter tall Turning Torso or Twistscraper, is quite an unlikely place for one of Europe’s tallest. Neguri Gane (145 meter) in Benidorm, Spain and Westpoint (142 meters) in Tilburg, The Netherlands are other such examples that rank high up there. One European city that actually seems to enjoy skyscrapers is Rotterdam, The Netherlands. (city population: 600,000, metro: 1.2 million). Rotterdam, above all known for its harbour, is one of the few European cities that have embraced the skyscraper as the building type to shape the city center. Finishing off the 152 meter tall Montevideo residential tower, a new highlight is being added to the expanding ‘American’ skyline. At this moment, Rotterdam has eight projects under development reaching 500 feet and up. Out of these, five are residential skyscrapers. Local government has zoning plans in which it’s stated that skyscrapers are wanted. The start of construction of skyscrapers is being celebrated in the yearly Construction Site Festival, finished towers will be cheered during the first Skyscraper Festival in 2006. Books about skyscrapers generally make it to the overall number one spot in local bookstores. The city is home of the Dutch Council on Tall Buildings. Thanks to high-rise, the city has obtained an established image of modernity and energy. But Rotterdam also accepted high-rise with open arms as a characteristic element of its appearance as a city of architecture. 2 Even though the development of residential skyscrapers is a recent one, the local high-rise history is quite interesting. Apart from the churches, bell towers and other tall structures not nor primarily used for housing purposes, it all started in 1898 when the 43 meter tall ‘Witte Huis’ was built, at the time the tallest office building in Europe. Based on the experience of the first high-rise apartment project in The Netherlands, the Nirwana Flat in The Hague, architect Jan Duiker was the first who published a study on high-rise in 1930 in which he reasoned that by going up, space, fresh air and sunlight would be available to all. Compared to the often cramped and dirty 19th century cities, that was a promising statement. He also argued that high-rise could lead to economies of scale, offering luxuries such as a launderette and a childcare, although he also concluded that high-rise living probably wouldn’t be suitable for families with children. The first theory based experiments took shape in four flat buildings for working-class tenants that were built in the 1930’s by architect Willem van Tijen, of which the Bergpolderlflat got the credit of being the first flat apartment building in the world. The obvious sounding reason to explain skyscrapers in the Rotterdam is the devastation of the city center in the beginning of World War II and the decision to reshape the whole city center structure according to modern principles of urban planning. As such, it is lacking an often cherished historical frame of reference by which new developments are bounded. In the early reconstruction years, a lot of attention was being given to the economical function of the city center, pretty much ignoring the residential function. Starting in the 1960’s, high-rise was massively being used to shape political ideals about social housing. It took shape in the form of flats, usually four to ten stories high, at quite a distance from the city center. The Germans have a word that grasps this truly European housing type; plattenbau. In the generation after the Second World War, countries throughout Europe built high-rise housing in the public sector as the 3 modern response to deal with housing shortage. As such, high-rise was an expression of the new Europe and especially in some Eastern European countries, that dream was kept alive a bit longer by the powers to be. Because of that, this building type is also referred to on popular web forums as ‘commieblocks’. In the mid 1970’s, people seemed to be fed up with this uniform and ‘unurban’ way of living. It wasn’t until the 1980’s when the department of urban planning started to think about how high-rise could be used to revitalise the city center. At that time, high-rise had a bad reputation. It was believed it would lead to lower property values, created traffic congestion and parking problems, was associated to high crime rates, was generally considered being unattractive and meant for lower-income households.