The Weak Link: the Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Natural
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Joint Evaluation of Multi-Donor Budget Support to Ghana
Joint Evaluation of Multi-Donor Budget Support to Ghana Based on OECD-DAC methodology Final Report Volume One: Evaluation Results and Recommendations on Future Design & Management of Ghana MDBS Andrew Lawson, Gyimah Boadi, Ato Ghartey, Adom Ghartey, Tony Killick, Zainab Kizilbash Agha and Tim Williamson Report to the Government of Ghana and to the MDBS Partners June 2007 Overseas Development Institute CDD-GHANA 111 Westminster Bridge Road P.O.Box 404 London SE1 7JD Legon-Accra, Ghana Disclaimer This report has been prepared by a joint team from the Overseas Development Institute, UK (ODI) and the Centre for Democratic Development, Accra (CDD), who were commissioned to undertake an independent evaluation of the impact of Multi Donor Budget Support (MDBS) in Ghana. It comprises the final draft of the Final Report, which has been amended in the light of comments received by the Government of Ghana, the MDBS partners and other relevant stakeholders. The evaluation was undertaken over August 2006 to May 2007. The bulk of field work was undertaken over August and September 2006, with preliminary observations presented at a retreat of the key MDBS stakeholders in Akosombo during October. Following a further brief field visit in November, conclusions were finalised in early 2007, amended in the light of comments received and then formally presented at two workshops held in Accra in April 2007. This final draft incorporates comments received at those workshops as well as further work on gender issues undertaken in May 2007. The participatory nature of the evaluation has allowed the Government of Ghana and the MDBS partners to incorporate ideas from the evaluation process both into aspects of Government policy and into the evolving design of the MDBS arrangements. -
GHANA ELECTION 2008 © 2010 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Ghana
GHANA ELECTION 2008 © 2010 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Ghana All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this book will be liable to criminal prosecution and claims for damages. contents page acronyms i acknowledgement ii foreword iii Chapter One: The Electoral System of Ghana 1 Chapter Two: Confidence Building Measures for the 2008 General Elections 9 Chapter Three: Preparations for Election 2008 23 Chapter Four: The Media and Election 2008 50 list of tables and figures page Table 1 Elections Observation Missions 13 for the 2008Elecctions Table 3.1 Vital Statistics on Registration for the Period 2004 - 2008 National Summary 26 Table 3.2 Vital Statistics on the 2008 Limited Voter Registration: 29 Age and Gender Distribution Table 3.3 Comparative Statistics on Voter Registration 31 Challenges between 1995 - 2008 Table 3.4 2008 Exhibition of Voters Register: 33 Age and Gender Distribution 35 Table 3.5 Presidential Candidates for 2008 Elections 35 Table 3.6 Running Mates for the 2008 Elections Table 3.7 Nomination of Parliamentary Candidates of Political Parties for the 2008 Elections 37 Table 3.8 Voter Turnout and Rejected Ballots for the 47 December 7, 2008 Elections Table 3.9 Voter Turnout and Rejected Ballots for 47 December 28, 2008 Presidential Run off acronyms COG Commonwealth Observer Group -
A Critical Study of Informal Fallacies in Some Socio-Political Discourse in Ghana
A CRITICAL STUDY OF INFORMAL FALLACIES IN SOME SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN GHANA BY RICHARD ANSAH submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) in the subject PHILOSOPHY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: Dr Ezekiel SN Mkhwanazi CO-SUPERVISOR: Prof MLJ Koenane 2019 1 DECLARATION Name: RICHARD ANSAH Student number: 58556893 Degree: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PHILOSOPHY) Exact wording of the title of the thesis as appearing on the electronic copy submitted for examination: A CRITICAL STUDY OF INFORMAL FALLACIES IN SOME SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN GHANA I declare that the above thesis is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. I further declare that I submitted the thesis to originality checking software and that it falls within the accepted requirements for originality. I further declare that I have not previously submitted this work, or part of it, for examination at Unisa for another qualification or at any other higher education institution. (The thesis will not be examined unless this statement has been submitted.) ________________________ February 10, 2020 SIGNATURE DATE 2 DEDICATION To my late mother, Agnes Obo and my late mother-in-law, Elizabeth Agyapong 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My profound gratitude goes to the Almighty God for strength to complete this work. Again, I wish to express my warmest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisors, Dr. Ezekiel SN Mkhwanazi and Professor Koenane Mojalefa for their patience, very important suggestions and inputs which aided in the successful completion of this work. -
Summary Report Assessment of Ministries/Ministers of Ghana for the Year 2019 - a Proposal for Immediate Ministerial Reshuffle and Structural Reforms
SUMMARY REPORT ASSESSMENT OF MINISTRIES/MINISTERS OF GHANA FOR THE YEAR 2019 - A PROPOSAL FOR IMMEDIATE MINISTERIAL RESHUFFLE AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS. This comprehensive survey forms part of ASEPA’s measures to primarily hold Government and its agents accountable and also to provide government with accurate information on the performance of its key ministries and ministers from the public perspective and to direct the path of government in rationing and reforming relevant ministries to attain optimum performance and efficiency that translates into socio economic development and also satisfy the ever rising expectations of the Citizens. This research was conducted in two main forms …. 1. ASEPA's official tracking, monitoring and evaluation of the key ministries and ministers for a period of 6 months (from May 2019 to October, 2019) which was done quantitatively by team of Analysts numbering up to 10. (…Mainly from the University of Ghana, University of Cape-Coast and UEW) Key areas were provided to these analysts and were made to score the various ministries on a scale of 0-100 and that served as the control test. 2. 5000 Respondents were then sampled from 3 Regions, (40% in Greater Accra, 30% in Ashanti Region and 30% in Volta Region). These respondents were then provided with a score sheet to score the Ministers and Ministries on the same criteria as provided for the Experts. METHODOLOGY FOR PUBLIC SURVEY This was a closed survey with a sample size of 5000 Respondents who were sampled purposively from various backgrounds including, formal and informal, lower, middle and upper INCOME citizens, Religious Leaders , Journalists, Civil Society Activists and Students. -
Ghana Background Note
Country Policy and Information Note Ghana: Background information, including internal relocation Version 1.0 September 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules • The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. -
Ghana Risk Review: April 2020
1 April 20 Ghana Risk Review: April 2020 Prepared for Omega Risk Solutions by Keith Campbell Consulting Ltd www.kccltd.co.uk Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES COUNTRY PROFILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 5 POLITICAL ...................................................................................................................... 16 MARCH - APRIL 2020 HEADLINES .............................................................................................. 16 POLITICAL STABILITY ................................................................................................................. 16 GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS ................................................................................................... 18 INSTITUTIONAL BALANCE/FUNCTIONING ..................................................................................... 19 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ....................................................................................................... 22 OPERATIONAL ................................................................................................................ 24 MARCH - APRIL 2020 HEADLINES .............................................................................................. 24 General............................................................................................................................ 25 Power ............................................................................................................................. -
34104 V. 2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
34104 v. 2 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized AN OPERATIONAL APPROACH FOR ASSESSING COUNTRY OWNERSHIP OF POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES VOLUME II: COUNTRY CASE STUDIES BOLIVIA, GHANA, KYRGYZ REPUBLIC, SENEGAL JANET ENTWISTLE, NATASHA BAJUK, FILIPPO CAVASSINI, FEDERICO STEINBERG OPERATIONS POLICY AND COUNTRY SERVICES FEBRUARY 2005 FOREWORD This study consists of two volumes. Volume I analyses the evidence from four case studies on country ownership of the Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) in Bolivia, Ghana, Kyrgyz Republic and Senegal, and draws some operational implications for enhancing country ownership of PRSs. Volume II presents the four country case studies. Didactic versions of each of the case studies were used as the basis of a discussion on the political economy of PRSs as part of a series of workshops on the PRS initiative, held in 2003 and 2004 and sponsored by a consortium of bilateral development assistance agencies and The World Bank. The didactic versions are available on the World Bank’s website. The study is the result of the work of a team led by Janet Entwistle (OPCS), and comprising Natasha Bajuk, Filippo Cavassini, Federico Steinberg and Christian Vakarelis (OPCS). Pablo Guerrero (OPCS) provided invaluable direction, encouragement and support. Rosa Alonso (formerly WBI, currently EAP), Lindsay Judge (formerly PRMPR, currently ESSD) and Jeni Klugman (formerly PRMPR, currently AFR) were instrumental in shaping the work from an early stage. Ioannis Kessides (DEC) made substantive contributions on the factors of ownership. Saydeh Shammas (OPCS) provided strong logistical support. Cynthia Delgadillo and Pansy Chintha (OPCS) helped with publication. The study reflects missions to Bolivia, Ghana, Kyrgyz Republic and Senegal, which included discussions with government officials, national stakeholders and officials of development assistance agencies, including the World Bank Country Office Directors or Country Managers and staff in each of these countries. -
The Weak Link the Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Natural Resource Management
OXFAM RESEARCH REPORT THE WEAK LINK THE ROLE OF LOCAL INSTITUTIONS IN ACCOUNTABLE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT GHANA COVER: An open pit mine in the town of Prestea, Ghana. Jeff Deutsch / Oxfam America 2 Oxfam America | The Weak Link: The Role of Local Institutions in Accountable Resource Management, Ghana CONTENTS Executive summary ............................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 9 2. Methods and conceptual framings .................................................................. 13 3. Revenue sharing in Ghana ............................................................................. 17 Mining revenues .............................................................................................. 17 Oil and gas revenues ....................................................................................... 20 Understanding revenue sharing in Ghana ....................................................... 22 Accountability and revenue sharing ................................................................. 27 4. Budget process and revenue allocations in Ghana ......................................... 37 Controlling the execution of the budget ........................................................... 39 Failings in the budget process ......................................................................... 41 5. Influencing revenue allocations ...................................................................... -
The Evolution of Social Protection Policy in Ghana's 'Fourth Republic'
CENTRE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH The evolution of social protection policy in Ghana’s ‘Fourth Republic’: Contributory social insurance reform and limited social assistance for the ‘extreme poor’ under NPP and NDC governments, 2000-2014 Eduard Grebe CSSR Working Paper No. 360 Legislating and Implementing Welfare Policy Reforms August 2015 Published by the Centre for Social Science Research University of Cape Town 2015 http://www.cssr.uct.ac.za This Working Paper can be downloaded from: http://cssr.uct.ac.za/pub/wp/360/ ISBN: 978-1-77011-347-3 © Centre for Social Science Research, UCT, 2015 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (C.C. by 4.0) licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ About the author: Eduard Grebe is a research associate of the Centre for Social Science Research at the University of Cape Town. [email protected]. Acknowledgements: The author would like to acknowledge the contribution of Prof Jeremy Seekings, who helped conceptualise the paper and provided useful comments on various drafts. We are grateful for funding for the LIWPR research programme from the UK Department for International Development, through the Economic and Social Research Council, through their Joint Fund for Poverty Alleviation. The evolution of social protection policy in Ghana’s ‘Fourth Republic’: Contributory social insurance reform and limited social assistance for the ‘extreme poor’ under NPP and NDC governments, 2000-2014 Abstract During the 2000s, Ghana introduced substantial social protection policy reforms. The contributory pensions system was reformed from a single statutory defined- benefit scheme and a colonial-era unfunded scheme for civil servants to a new system with additional mandatory and voluntary privately-administered ‘tiers’ augmenting the statutory scheme. -
Electoral Commission of Ghana, with Support of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Accra November, 2005
ELECTIONS 2004 ELECTIONS 2004 Ghana´s Parliamentary and Presidential Elections GHANA’S PARLIAMENTARY AND PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 2004 Published by the Electoral Commission of Ghana, with support of the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Accra November, 2005 ISBN: Printed & designed by O’mens graphix, Accra www.omens-graphix.com Tel. 021-238098 CONTENT 1. The 2004 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections by the Electoral Commission of Ghana 1 Foreword . .2 Part 1 - The Electoral System . .3 Part 2 - Preparations towards the Holding of the 2004 General Elections . .9 Part 3 - The Contest and the Contestants . .28 Part 4 - Election Supervision, Monitoring and Observation . .71 2. Voting Patterns in the 2004 Elections by Joseph R.A. Ayee 79 Introduction . .80 Part 1 - The Concept of Ethnicity . .81 Part 2 - Manifestations of Ethnicity in Ghanaian Politics since Independence . .83 Part 3 - Voting Patterns in the 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004 Elections . .88 Part 4 - Conclusions: Explaining the Voting Patterns and the Lessons . .90 References . .98 3. Changes in Voting Patterns and Behaviours in Ghana’s 2004 General Elections by Dr. A. Essuman-Johnson 99 Change in Voting Patterns in Ghana’s 2000 and 2004 General Elections . .100 Explaining the shift from NDC to NPP: 2000 Elections . .103 The Poverty Factor . .105 The voting pattern in Ghana’s 2004 elections . .106 The Gender Factor . .109 Some Conclusions . .112 References . .113 4. Parliamentary Election Results by the Electoral Commission of Ghana 115 for Region ASHANTI . .117 for Region BRONG AHAFO . .131 for Region CENTRAL . .141 for Region EASTERN . .149 for Region GREATER ACCRA . .161 for Region NORTHERN . .173 for Region UPPER EAST . -
Ghana Risk Review: June 2020
1 June 20 Ghana Risk Review: June 2020 Prepared for Omega Risk Solutions by Keith Campbell Consulting Ltd www.kccltd.co.uk Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ 3 COUNTRY PROFILE ................................................................................. 1_Toc44285126 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 5 POLITICAL ............................................................................................................................... 19 MAY - JUNE 2020 HEADLINES ................................................................................................... 19 POLITICAL STABILITY ................................................................................................................. 20 GOVERNMENT EFFECTIVENESS ................................................................................................... 21 INSTITUTIONAL BALANCE/FUNCTIONING ..................................................................................... 23 CONTRACT FRUSTRATION .......................................................................................................... 24 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ....................................................................................................... 25 OPERATIONAL ................................................................................................................ 27 MAY - JUNE -
Ghana | Freedom House
Ghana | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/ghana A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The president, who serves as head of state and head of government, is directly elected for up to two four-year terms. International and domestic observers generally praised the 2016 presidential election, and all major political parties accepted the results. Akufo-Addo, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) candidate, won with 53.9 percent of the vote, while incumbent John Mahama of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) took 44.4 percent. Although the election and its immediate aftermath were peaceful, the campaign period was contentious. There were several reports of clashes between NPP and NDC supporters, as well as attacks on EC officials. Moreover, civil society representatives raised concerns about what they claimed were alarming levels of hate speech used by politicians, as well as alleged abuse of state resources. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Members of Ghana’s unicameral, 275-seat Parliament are elected directly in single- member constituencies to serve four-year terms. International and domestic observers generally praised the 2016 parliamentary elections, which were held at the same time as the presidential election. The NPP captured 169 seats, while the NDC, which held a majority going into the vote, took the remaining 106 seats. A3. Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 4 / 4 Despite controversy surrounding preparations for the December 2016 balloting, domestic and international observers generally commended the EC for its management of the process.