sign in sign up
<<
Home , Philosophical Fragments

KIERKEGAARDS WRITINGS: CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT TO PHILOSOPHICAL FRAGMENTS V. 12, PT. 2 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK

Sören Kierkegaard,Howard V. Hong,Edna H. Hong | 368 pages | 05 Jul 1992 | Princeton University Press | 9780691020822 | English | New Jersey, United States Kierkegaards Writings: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments v. 12, Pt. 2 PDF Book It is a faith without icons, images, stories, and myths, without miracles, without a resurrection, without a nativity, without Chartres and Fra Angelico , without wine and wafers, without heaven and hell, without God as judge and without judgment. Hong Kong Paperback Books. Here Hannay points out that Climacus identifies himself repeatedly as a "humorist", meaning that he is a psychological and religious chameleon: he can think his way into all manner of walks of life without committing to any of them. But since he is bound by himself, may he not loose his bonds and set himself free? Indeed, from what does that confusion of thoughtlessness come but from this, that the 's thought ventures, observing, out into life, wants to survey the whole of , that play of forces that only God in heaven can view calmly, because in his providence he governs it with wise and omniscient purpose, but which weakens a human 's mind and makes him mentally deranged, causes him misplaced care, and strengthens with regrettable consolation. This fact can be a convenience, but it can also be a curse; in borderline cases, it tempts the translator to sacrifice English clarity for sharper surface echoes of the Danish. January God is indeed free in ; he can reveal himself or not; but he is not free as to the understanding; he cannot reveal to man whatever he will, but only what is adapted to man, what is commensurate with his nature such as it actually is; he reveals what he must reveal, if his is to be a revelation for man, and not for some other kind of being. Only by becoming man himself, but not a king, or a leader of an established order, no, for equality's sake he must become one of the humblest, a servant. If the credibility of a contemporary is to have any interest for him—and alas! It then affirms that the passionate idolater, rather than the passionless Christian, is the one who prays aright: "The one prays in truth to God though he worships an idol; the other prays falsely to the true God, and hence worships in fact an idol. Will be clean, not soiled or stained. But between sensibility and a theoretical proposition is a greater difference than between a living animal and its anatomical skeleton. Kierkegaard says, "By gives him a name, and he is a Christian de nomine by name ; but in the decision [note 2] he becomes a Christian and gives Christianity his name. And when death comes it still deceives the contemplator, because all his did not come a single step closer to the explanation but only deceived him out of life. Danish and English are close enough that it is often possible to retain much of Kierkegaard's own syntax, phraseology, and even wordplay. Published in and written A work that "not only treats of irony but is irony," wrote a contemporary reviewer of The Concept of Irony, with Continual Reference to . God is just man's idea. But that would make the of the prayer's addressee utterly irrelevant to the prayer's status as authentic or inauthentic. Belief believes what it does not see; it sees that the star is there, but what it believes is that the star has come into existence. Therefore it was good that the work was a psychological inquiry, which in itself makes clear that cannot find a place in the system, presumably just like immortality, faith, the paradox, and other such concepts that essentially related to existing, just what systematic thinking ignores. Instead of the objective , there is here the that, viewed objectively, it is the absurd, and this absurdity, held fast in the passion of inwardness, is faith. Having made these distinctions, the Postscript then tries to specify the Christian's peculiar predicament as a sinner seeking salvation in an absurdity. Was Kierkegaard a Monergist or a Synergist? He wants to make himself understood just like a teacher but He's teaching something that doesn't come to an individual from the known world but from a world that is Unknown. The original choice is forever present in every succeeding choice. Kierkegaards Writings: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments v. 12, Pt. 2 Writer

And yet, with all the fragmentary nature of literature, we find thousand fold repetition; which shows how limited is man's mind and destiny. But since the paradox is not in itself the paradox, it does not thrust away intensely enough. , Hong p. In particular, "Johannes Climacus" may well echo 's celebrated image of Pyrrhonian argument as a kind of "step-ladder", which the user is supposed to "knock over … after his climb. Hannay's key strength as a translator is his daring. If anyone proposes to believe, i. Travel Writing Paperback Books. His authorship begins, as it was destined to end, with polemic. He was Hegelian and had no room in his system for faith. His words read as follows: "That, that is the ugly broad ditch that I cannot cross, however often and however earnestly I have tried to make the leap. When Socrates believed that God is, he held fast the objective uncertainty with the entire passion of inwardness, and faith is precisely in this contradiction, in this risk. It is so far from being the case that it is particularly characteristic of people called unfortunate individualities that they cling most of all to themselves, that despite all their sufferings they still would not wish to be anybody else for all the world. But this love is through and through unhappy, for how great is the difference between them! This, according to Hannay, is why the Postscript 's revocation should not detract from the book's value as an analysis of Christianity. Kierkegaard leads his reader to consider how a teacher might become a teacher. Three Upbuilding Discourses, The original choice is forever present in every succeeding choice. Soren Kierkegaard read the works of both Hegel and Goethe. From The Creed of the Savoyard Priest This corresponds exactly to the requirement that man must renounce his , and on the other hand discloses the only form of authority that corresponds to Faith. Philosophers and Historians tend to try to prove Christianity rather than teach belief in Christ through faith. Its spearhead was Walter Lowrie, an Episcopal minister who cast himself as Kierkegaard's "missionary", and promoted Kierkegaard's vision of faith as a bulwark against liberal . But what about God? For whoever has what he has from the God himself clearly has it at first hand; and he who does not have it from the God himself is not a . At least Christianity does not assume it; on the contrary, it assumes that sinful children are born of Christian parents just as in paganism. He could elevate the learner to help the learner forget the misunderstanding. Kierkegaards Writings: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments v. 12, Pt. 2 Reviews

His virtue, for the reader, is that he sees the way to the top, while his value depends on his not having got there; for then he would have disappeared from view" xvii. Kierkegaardian scholars D. Literature is a fragment of fragments: the least of what happened and was spoken, has been written; and of the things that have been written, very few have been preserved. Schlegel published a book bearing the same title as Kierkegaard's, Philosophical Fragments in But that would make the identity of the prayer's addressee utterly irrelevant to the prayer's status as authentic or inauthentic. He could have been thinking about this quote when he wrote this book. He developed the idea of bad faith. Kierkegaard seemed to rely on faith at the expense of the intellect. Lessing has himself consolidated this issue in the following words, which he has in boldface: contingent truths of history can never become the demonstrations of necessary truths of reason. That is because such people are very close to the truth, and they feel the eternal validity of the personality not in its blessing but in its torment, even if they have retained this totally abstract expression for the joy in it; that they prefer to go on being themselves. Kierkegaard always wrote a preface signed by the name of the pseudonymous author he was using. For him the surpassing of the unhappy consciousness remains purely verbal. But for Kierkegaard "all coming into existence takes place in freedom. Goethe and Kierkegaard each stressed the need for the individual to come to an understanding of what the Bible is all about and then applying that understanding as it is appropriated. The confusion is caused by the words "in truth", which are just the literal equivalents of the Danish " i Sandhed ". Kierkegaard's first published article touches on the theme of women's emancipation Therefore it was good that the work was a psychological inquiry, which in itself makes clear that sin cannot find a place in the system, presumably just like immortality, faith, the paradox, and other such concepts that essentially related to existing, just what systematic thinking ignores. Everything that becomes historical is contingent , inasmuch as precisely by coming into existence, by becoming historical, it has its element of contingency, inasmuch as contingency is precisely the one factor in all coming into existence. Yet Point of View is neither a confession nor a defense; When the seed of the oak is planted in earthen vessels, they break asunder; when new wine is poured in old leather bottles, they burst; what must happen when the God implants himself in human weakness, unless man becomes a new vessel and a new creature! The Hongs prized consistency and literal precision, if at times at the expense of English flow. The absurd is that the eternal truth has come into existence in time, that God has come into existence, has been born, has grown up, has come into existence exactly as an individual human being, indistinguishable from any other human being. Show More Show Less. What is important in choosing is not so much to choose the right thing as the energy, the earnestness, and the with which one chooses. He could elevate the learner to help the learner forget the misunderstanding. For the moment he forgets him he sinks back again into himself, just as one who while in original possession of the condition forgot that God exists, and thereby sank into bondage. In such a world, faith is indeed inconceivable. The Corsair affair has been called the "most renowned controversy in Danish literary history. Faith is not the work of reason, because faith arises just as little from reason as tasting and seeing does. And the understanding—how precarious, and how close each moment to misunderstanding, when the of seeks to disturb the peace of love! Through this choice, I actually choose between good and evil, but I choose the good, I choose eo ipso the choice between good and evil. The who lives esthetically also does that, and the popular expression heard in all ages and from various stages is this: One must enjoy life. In Kierkegaard's usage, the name is likely meant to echo the Postscript 's own ladder-like attempt to use reason to scale the heights of a Christianity that defies understanding. Eduard Geismar gave a seminar about the religious thought of Kierkegaard in God could show himself to the learner and cause him to forget his Error while contemplating God's presence. Whenever possible, I linked to books with my amazon affiliate code, and as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Best Selling in Nonfiction See all. But we say humbly: as a whole it is worthy of respect, and in all its parts it is applicable. It is improper to love a young girl as if she were one's mother or one's mother as if she were a young girl; every love has its distinctiveness; love of God has its absolute distinctiveness, and its expression is repentance. But who then may be expected to think the new birth? And of reason the same may be said as was said of Christ: that he who is not with it is against it. Buy It Now.

Kierkegaards Writings: Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments v. 12, Pt. 2 Read Online

If a second edition is issued, I suggest that such references be added. Two Ages , here presented in a definitive English text, is But God can't make himself understood because he's completely unlike every other human being. But what about God? This, according to Hannay, is why the Postscript 's revocation should not detract from the book's value as an analysis of Christianity. These works discuss fundamental issues in Ethics and the Philosophy of Religion , such as the nature of God and faith , faith's relationship with Ethics and morality, and the difficulty of being authentically religious. from Dostoyevsky. Faith is not the work of reason, because faith arises just as little from reason as tasting and seeing does. But for Kierkegaard "all coming into existence takes place in freedom. His works from to written using a pseudonym , including "Philosophical Fragments" , "The Concept of Dread" , "Stages on Life's Way" and, especially, the massive "Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments" , focus even more on the perceived shortcomings of the philosophy of Hegel and form the basis for existential psychology. Swenson was the first to translate the book into English in Otto Pfleiderer wrote an assessment of Kierkegaard's views in By contrast, the passionless Christian is so far from fulfilling the task of praying to God that he may be regarded as having utterly flouted it namely, as though he were an enthusiast of idolatry , even if he has gotten his prayer's objective dimension right. He chooses himself-not in a finite sense, for then this " " would indeed be something finite that would fall among all the other finite things-but in the absolute sense, and yet he does choose himself and not someone else. Kierkegaard calls this Error "Sin". He proposed to her in , but mysteriously broke off the engagement less than a year later during a period of melancholy and depression. If all the angels united, they would still be able to produce only an approximation, because in historical knowledge an approximation is the only certainty-but also too little on which to build an eternal happiness. Was Kierkegaard a Monergist or a Synergist? The Postscript famously, and to some notoriously, prefers the latter standard of authenticity. Here is Hannay's version in full: "The one prays truly to God though he worships an idol; the other prays untruly to the true God, and therefore truly worships an idol" Let us call him Saviour , for he saves the learner from his bondage and from himself; let us call him , for he redeems the learner from the captivity into which he had plunged himself, and no captivity is so terrible and so impossible to break, as that in which the individual keeps himself. Travel Writing Books. And when death comes it still deceives the contemplator, because all his contemplation did not come a single step closer to the explanation but only deceived him out of life. Written as an afterword to this This may take a bit of getting used to, but it is an ingenious way to avert confusion. The same principle must also hold in the case of the new birth. Kierkegaard explores how a contemporary of Christ and succeeding generations receive the "condition" necessary to understand the Paradox that God has permitted himself to be born and wrapped in swaddling-clothes. He provided an extended contrast between the aesthetic and ethical ways of life, concluding that the radical human freedom of the aesthetic inevitably leads to "" dread , the call of the infinite , and eventually to despair. A new translation under the corrected title has recently appeared: see Kierkegaard, Repetition and Philosophical Crumbs , tr. God's love moves everything. The less objective reliability, the deeper is the possible inwardness. Kierkegaard always wrote a preface signed by the name of the pseudonymous author he was using. You may also like. If the collision results in an unhappy encounter the Reason is Offended. Instead of the objective uncertainty, there is here the certainty that, viewed objectively, it is the absurd, and this absurdity, held fast in the passion of inwardness, is faith. Three Upbuilding Discourses, But this love is through and through unhappy, for how great is the difference between them! The price may be the seller's own price elsewhere or another seller's price. What, then, is the absurd? I nonetheless recommend this edition highly. Such reasonings are always rash; a wise man should venture on them with trembling, he should be certain that he can never sound their abysses; for the most insolent attitude towards God is not to abstain from thinking of him, but to think evil of him. Kierkegaard mentioned in his book Repetition p. Skip to main content. Pears and B. This item doesn't belong on this page. The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. Now it is otherwise. Then he steps back, prudently, from the scene. But we say humbly: as a whole it is worthy of respect, and in all its parts it is applicable. It discusses Christianity's content by means of analogies which it keeps taking back, citing variations on the formula understanding is revocation , n, , https://files8.webydo.com/9585944/UploadedFiles/CCF98563-C67F-0D79-1B95-622CC4BAE504.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9585171/UploadedFiles/837A9943-D73F-F244-7AE8-A9B191FFDB75.pdf https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/b70d3658-cc8c-4417-8256-05a136eeefe7/a-guys-guide-to-being-a-mans-man-154.pdf https://files8.webydo.com/9584768/UploadedFiles/2A5AEB1A-DBF8-B403-3819-43AA1F3A5C3C.pdf