DOCSLIB.ORG

Toxicological Review (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toxicological Review (PDF) EPA/635/R-03/013 www.epa.gov/iris TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (CAS No. 71-55-6) In Support of Summary Information on the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) August 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. i CONTENTS—TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (CAS No. 71-55-6) LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................... vii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................. ix AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS, AND REVIEWERS................................................................... x 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 2. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION.................................................................... 3 3. TOXICOKINETICS .................................................................................................................. 6 3.1. ABSORPTION.................................................................................................................. 6 3.2. DISTRIBUTION............................................................................................................. 10 3.3. METABOLISM .............................................................................................................. 14 3.4. ELIMINATION .............................................................................................................. 19 3.5. PHYSIOLOGICALLY BASED PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS ............................ 20 3.5.1. Summary of Available Models............................................................................ 20 3.5.2. Model Selection................................................................................................... 28 4. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION................................................................................................ 30 4.1. STUDIES IN HUMANS—EPIDEMIOLOGY, CASE REPORTS, CLINICAL CONTROLS ................................................................................................................... 30 4.1.1. Oral Exposure ...................................................................................................... 30 4.1.2. Inhalation Exposure ............................................................................................. 31 4.1.2.1. Experimental Human Exposure Studies ................................................ 32 4.1.2.2. Epidemiological Studies ........................................................................ 40 4.2. LESS-THAN-LIFETIME AND CHRONIC STUDIES AND CANCER BIOASSAYS IN ANIMALS—ORAL AND INHALATION........................................ 48 4.2.1. Oral Exposure ...................................................................................................... 48 4.2.1.1. Acute Studies ......................................................................................... 48 4.2.1.2. Short-term Studies ................................................................................. 49 4.2.1.3. Subchronic Studies ................................................................................ 51 4.2.1.4. Chronic Studies...................................................................................... 55 4.2.2. Inhalation Exposure ............................................................................................. 56 4.2.2.1. Acute Studies ......................................................................................... 56 4.2.2.2. Short-term Studies ................................................................................. 61 4.2.2.3. Subchronic Studies ................................................................................ 62 4.2.2.4. Chronic Studies...................................................................................... 66 4.3. REPRODUCTIVE/DEVELOPMENTAL STUDIES—ORAL AND INHALATION... 68 4.3.1. Oral Exposure ...................................................................................................... 68 4.3.2. Inhalation Exposure ............................................................................................. 72 ii 4.4. OTHER ENDPOINT-SPECIFIC STUDIES................................................................... 77 4.4.1. Neurological Effects ............................................................................................ 77 4.4.1.1. Oral Exposure ........................................................................................ 77 4.4.1.2. Inhalation Exposure ............................................................................... 77 4.4.2. Immunological Effects......................................................................................... 85 4.4.3. Effects by Dermal Exposure................................................................................ 85 4.4.4. Effects by Parenteral Exposure............................................................................ 86 4.5. MECHANISTIC DATA AND OTHER STUDIES IN SUPPORT OF THE MODE OF ACTION....................................................................................................... 87 4.5.1. Mechanistic Data from In Vitro Studies.............................................................. 87 4.5.2. Genotoxicity ........................................................................................................ 88 4.6. SYNTHESIS OF MAJOR NONCANCER EFFECTS................................................... 91 4.6.1. Oral ...................................................................................................................... 91 4.6.2. Inhalation ............................................................................................................. 99 4.6.3. Mode-of-Action Information ............................................................................. 112 4.7. EVALUATION OF CARCINOGENICITY................................................................. 115 4.7.1. Summary of Overall Weight of Evidence.......................................................... 115 4.7.2. Synthesis of Human, Animal, and Other Supporting Evidence ........................ 115 4.8. SUSCEPTIBLE POPULATIONS AND LIFE STAGES ............................................. 118 4.8.1. Possible Childhood Susceptibility ..................................................................... 118 4.8.2. Possible Gender Differences.............................................................................. 118 4.8.3. Other Potentially Susceptible Populations......................................................... 118 5. DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENTS ................................................................................... 120 5.1. ORAL REFERENCE DOSE (RfD).............................................................................. 120 5.1.1. Acute Oral RfD.................................................................................................. 120 5.1.2. Short-term Oral RfD .......................................................................................... 120 5.1.3. Subchronic Oral RfD ......................................................................................... 121 5.1.3.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect—with Rationale and Justification .................................................................. 121 5.1.3.2. Methods of Analysis ............................................................................ 123 5.1.3.3. Subchronic RfD Derivation—Including Application of Uncertainty Factors (UFs) ................................................................... 125 5.1.4. Chronic Oral RfD............................................................................................... 126 5.1.4.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect—with Rationale and Justification .................................................................. 126 5.1.4.2. Methods of Analysis ............................................................................ 127 5.1.4.3. RfD Derivation—Including Application of Uncertainty Factors (UFs) ....................................................................................... 127 5.1.4.4. Previous Oral Assessment ................................................................... 129 5.1.5. RfD Derivation Using Route-to-Route Extrapolation ....................................... 129 5.1.5.1. Acute and Short-term Durations.......................................................... 129 5.1.5.2. Subchronic and Chronic Durations...................................................... 130 5.2. INHALATION REFERENCE CONCENTRATION (RfC)......................................... 130 5.2.1. Acute Inhalation RfC......................................................................................... 130 5.2.1.1. Choice of Principal Study and Critical Effect—with Rationale and Justification..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for the Forensic Analysis of Drugs Facilitating Sexual Assault and Other Criminal Acts
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidelines for the Forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts United Nations publication Printed in Austria ST/NAR/45 *1186331*V.11-86331—December 2011 —300 Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library, iStock.com/Abel Mitja Varela Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidelines for the forensic analysis of drugs facilitating sexual assault and other criminal acts UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 ST/NAR/45 © United Nations, December 2011. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. List of abbreviations . v Acknowledgements .......................................... vii 1. Introduction............................................. 1 1.1. Background ........................................ 1 1.2. Purpose and scope of the manual ...................... 2 2. Investigative and analytical challenges ....................... 5 3 Evidence collection ...................................... 9 3.1. Evidence collection kits .............................. 9 3.2. Sample transfer and storage........................... 10 3.3. Biological samples and sampling ...................... 11 3.4. Other samples ...................................... 12 4. Analytical considerations .................................. 13 4.1. Substances encountered in DFSA and other DFC cases .... 13 4.2. Procedures and analytical strategy...................... 14 4.3. Analytical methodology .............................. 15 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenobarbital Brand Name: Phenobarb
    Generic Name: Phenobarbital Brand Name: Phenobarb What Is It Used For? Decreasing seizure activity in various types of seizures. Especially useful for controlling seizures in neonates and infants Given intravenously in the emergency department for status epilepticus. How Long Does The Oral Medicine Take to Work? 10-30 days What Are The Important Safety Concerns? When first starting the medicine, your child may be slightly drowsy and/or dizzy. Only adjust the dosage as recommended by your health care provider. They will usually increase this medication slowly to avoid side effects. Never increase the dosage more than once per week unless directed otherwise. Once you have started with one brand of the medication stay with it. Avoid switching between different brands. Check with your pharmacist before taking herbal medications and/or over-the- counter medications. They may have adverse effects if taken with anti-seizure medications. Do not stop taking this medication suddenly because this could result in seizures. It is important to keep a record of your child’s seizures and side effects to determine how well they are responding to the medication. Does My Child Need Bloodwork With This Medication? Routine blood work may be done to help determine the best dosage for your child, and also if they have side effects to the medication. If your child is required to have blood work it must be done BEFORE they get the medication. This is called a trough level. This level usually falls between 65 and 170. A blood test may be done before starting this medication to check your child’s liver function and blood counts.
    [Show full text]
  • PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM- Pentobarbital Sodium Injection Akorn, Inc
    PENTOBARBITAL SODIUM- pentobarbital sodium injection Akorn, Inc. ---------- Nembutal® Sodium Solution CII (pentobarbital sodium injection, USP) + novaplus TM Rx only Vials DO NOT USE IF MATERIAL HAS PRECIPITATED DESCRIPTION The barbiturates are nonselective central nervous system depressants which are primarily used as sedative hypnotics and also anticonvulsants in subhypnotic doses. The barbiturates and their sodium salts are subject to control under the Federal Controlled Substances Act (See “Drug Abuse and Dependence” section). The sodium salts of amobarbital, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and secobarbital are available as sterile parenteral solutions. Barbiturates are substituted pyrimidine derivatives in which the basic structure common to these drugs is barbituric acid, a substance which has no central nervous system (CNS) activity. CNS activity is obtained by substituting alkyl, alkenyl, or aryl groups on the pyrimidine ring. NEMBUTAL Sodium Solution (pentobarbital sodium injection) is a sterile solution for intravenous or intramuscular injection. Each mL contains pentobarbital sodium 50 mg, in a vehicle of propylene glycol, 40%, alcohol, 10% and water for injection, to volume. The pH is adjusted to approximately 9.5 with hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide. NEMBUTAL Sodium is a short-acting barbiturate, chemically designated as sodium 5-ethyl-5-(1- methylbutyl) barbiturate. The structural formula for pentobarbital sodium is: The sodium salt occurs as a white, slightly bitter powder which is freely soluble in water and alcohol but practically insoluble in benzene and ether. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Barbiturates are capable of producing all levels of CNS mood alteration from excitation to mild sedation, to hypnosis, and deep coma. Overdosage can produce death. In high enough therapeutic doses, barbiturates induce anesthesia.
    [Show full text]
  • CDHO Factsheet Epilepsy
    Disease/Medical Condition EPILEPSY Date of Publication: August 7, 2014 (also known as “seizure disorder”) Is the initiation of non-invasive dental hygiene procedures* contra-indicated? No Is medical consult advised? ...................................... No (assuming patient/client is already under medical care for epilepsy, which is well controlled) Is the initiation of invasive dental hygiene procedures contra-indicated?** No Is medical consult advised? ....................................... Possibly (e.g., if there is medication non-compliance) Is medical clearance required? .................................. Possibly (e.g., if there is significant risk of seizure; patient/ client should be seizure-free for several months to be considered controlled) Is antibiotic prophylaxis required? .............................. No Is postponing treatment advised? ............................... No (assuming patient/client is already under medical care for epilepsy, which is well controlled and for which there are no anticipated exacerbating factors in the office setting) Oral management implications Important considerations in the management of epileptic patients/clients are prevention of seizures in the dental chair and preparation for managing seizures if they occur. When a patient/client responds positively to questions about seizures/ epilepsy during health history taking, further information should be obtained. Based on the patient/client’s responses, the dental hygienist may choose to postpone treatment to avoid triggering a seizure in the dental chair. It is valuable for the dental hygienist to know what factors have the potential to exacerbate epileptic seizures in a particular patient/client in order that trigger stimuli can be avoided. The dental hygienist can reduce stress and anxiety by explaining procedures before starting. Bright light should be kept out of the patient/client’s eyes, and dark glasses may assist with this.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliberate Self-Poisoning with a Lethal Dose of Pentobarbital: Survival with Supportive Care
    Deliberate self-poisoning with a lethal dose of pentobarbital: Survival with supportive care. (1) (1,2) Santosh Gone , Andis Graudins (1) Clinical Toxicology Service, Program of Emergency Medicine, Monash Health (2) Monash Emergency Research Collaboration, Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University Abstract 84 INTRODUCTION CASE REPORT (continued) DISCUSSION Pentobarbital (Nembutal) is short acting In the ED: Pentobarbital has been a banned substance for barbiturate sedative-hypnotic, currently widely GCS: 3/15, fixed dilated pupils, apnoeic and human use in Australia since 1998. However, it can used in veterinary practice for anesthesia and ventilated. be procured overseas or bought on the internet. euthanasia. Pulse: 116 bpm sinus tachycardia BP: 115/60 on epinephrine infusion. Pentobarbital is recommended as an effective It is also commonly recommended as a VBG: pH 7.03 pCO2 77 mmHg Bicarb 19 mmol/L agent for use in euthanasia due to its apparently euthanasia drug for assisted suicide and it is Lactate 8.8 mmol/L peaceful transition to death. unlikely that any resuscitative measures will be Activated charcoal (50g) given via an NG tube. attempted in such cases. Course in the Intensive Care Department: In a case series of 150 assisted suicides in Day-1 post-OD: Sweden, a 100% success rate was seen with Intentional overdose results in depression of - Absent brain stem reflexes and fixed dilated pupils for ingestion of 9 grams. Cardiovascular collapse was brain stem function and rapid onset respiratory five days. seen within 15 minutes in 30% of patients. It is rare depression and apnoea. Hypotension also - Diabetes insipidus developed with urine output of to see survival after intentional ingestion for develops, followed by cardiovascular collapse 300ml/hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentobarbital Sodium
    PENTobarbital Sodium Brand names Nembutal Sodium Medication error Look-alike, sound-alike drug names. Tall man letters (not FDA approved) are recommended potential to decrease confusion between PENTobarbital and PHENobarbital.(1,2) ISMP recommends the following tall man letters (not FDA approved): PENTobarbital.(30) Contraindications Contraindications: In patients with known hypersensitivity to barbiturates or any com- and warnings ponent of the formulation.(2) If an allergic or hypersensitivity reaction or a life-threatening adverse event occurs, rapid substitution of an alternative agent may be necessary. If pentobarbital is discontinued due to development of a rash, an anticonvulsant that is structurally dissimilar should be used (i.e., nonaromatic). (See Rare Adverse Effects in the Comments section.) Also contraindicated in patients with a history of manifest or latent porphyria.(2) Warnings: Rapid administration may cause respiratory depression, apnea, laryngospasm, or vasodilation with hypotension.(2) Should be withdrawn gradually if large doses have been used for prolonged periods.(2) Paradoxical excitement may occur or important symptoms could be masked when given to patients with acute or chronic pain.(2) May be habit forming. Infusion-related Respiratory depression and arrest requiring mechanical ventilation may occur. Monitor cautions oxygen saturation. If hypotension occurs, the infusion rate should be decreased and/or the patient should be treated with IV fluids and/or vasopressors. Pentobarbital is an alkaline solution (pH = 9–10.5); therefore, extravasation may cause tissue necrosis.(2) (See Appendix E for management.) Gangrene may occur following inadvertent intra-arterial injection.(2) Dosage Medically induced coma (for persistently elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) or refractory status epilepticus): Patient should be intubated and mechanically ventilated.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology – Inhalant Anesthetics
    Pharmacology- Inhalant Anesthetics Lyon Lee DVM PhD DACVA Introduction • Maintenance of general anesthesia is primarily carried out using inhalation anesthetics, although intravenous anesthetics may be used for short procedures. • Inhalation anesthetics provide quicker changes of anesthetic depth than injectable anesthetics, and reversal of central nervous depression is more readily achieved, explaining for its popularity in prolonged anesthesia (less risk of overdosing, less accumulation and quicker recovery) (see table 1) Table 1. Comparison of inhalant and injectable anesthetics Inhalant Technique Injectable Technique Expensive Equipment Cheap (needles, syringes) Patent Airway and high O2 Not necessarily Better control of anesthetic depth Once given, suffer the consequences Ease of elimination (ventilation) Only through metabolism & Excretion Pollution No • Commonly administered inhalant anesthetics include volatile liquids such as isoflurane, halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane, and inorganic gas, nitrous oxide (N2O). Except N2O, these volatile anesthetics are chemically ‘halogenated hydrocarbons’ and all are closely related. • Physical characteristics of volatile anesthetics govern their clinical effects and practicality associated with their use. Table 2. Physical characteristics of some volatile anesthetic agents. (MAC is for man) Name partition coefficient. boiling point MAC % blood /gas oil/gas (deg=C) Nitrous oxide 0.47 1.4 -89 105 Cyclopropane 0.55 11.5 -34 9.2 Halothane 2.4 220 50.2 0.75 Methoxyflurane 11.0 950 104.7 0.2 Enflurane 1.9 98 56.5 1.68 Isoflurane 1.4 97 48.5 1.15 Sevoflurane 0.6 53 58.5 2.5 Desflurane 0.42 18.7 25 5.72 Diethyl ether 12 65 34.6 1.92 Chloroform 8 400 61.2 0.77 Trichloroethylene 9 714 86.7 0.23 • The volatile anesthetics are administered as vapors after their evaporization in devices known as vaporizers.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Office of Chief Medical Examiner City of New York
    FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK CARISOPRODOL , MEPROBAMATE and TOPIRAMATE by SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION and GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY (Selected Ion Monitoring) PRINCIPLE Carisoprodol is a carbamate derivative first synthesized in 1959. It is primarily used as a muscle relaxant. UncontrolledMeprobamate is also a carbamate derivative used as a muscle relaxant and the primary metabolite of carisoprodol. Topiramate is a sulfamate-substituted monosaccharide used as an anticonvulsant Carisoprodol, meprobamate and topiramate are quantitated by a selected ion monitoring (SIM) method using methapyrilene as the internal standard. Carisoprodol, meprobamate and topiramate are extracted from biological specimens by solid phase extraction. Drugs are temporarily bound to a sorbent in the solid phase cartridge as the prepared sample is poured through the column. The column is washed to remove interfering compounds, followed by elution of drugs from the column. The eluate is evaporated, reconstituted and injected in the GCMS. Quantitative analysis is performed by SIM GCMS using a six point calibration curve. SAFETY The handling of all biological specimens and reagents is performed within the guidelines which are detailed in the Safety and Health manual. Copy SPECIMEN PREPARATION The procedure is routinely applied to the following biological specimens and their aliquots unless otherwise specified: Blood 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Urine 0.5 mL for qualitative identification Brain 0.5 mL of a 1:3 homogenate Gastric Contents 0.5 mL of a 1:10 dilution Liver 0.5 mL of a 1:5 homogenate Vitreous Humor 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Bile 0.5 mL of the undiluted specimen Reviewed by: Date: Page 1 of 14 T:\FINALSOP\FINAL SOP PDF\G.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen Et Al
    USOO8603526B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS 2008. O152595 A1 6/2008 Emigh et al. RESISTANT TO ABUSE 2008. O166407 A1 7/2008 Shalaby et al. 2008/0299.199 A1 12/2008 Bar-Shalom et al. 2008/0311205 A1 12/2008 Habib et al. (75) Inventors: Peter Holm Tygesen, Smoerum (DK); 2009/0022790 A1 1/2009 Flath et al. Jan Martin Oevergaard, Frederikssund 2010/0203129 A1 8/2010 Andersen et al. (DK); Karsten Lindhardt, Haslev (DK); 2010/0204259 A1 8/2010 Tygesen et al. Louise Inoka Lyhne-versen, Gentofte 2010/0239667 A1 9/2010 Hemmingsen et al. (DK); Martin Rex Olsen, Holbaek 2010, O291205 A1 11/2010 Downie et al. (DK); Anne-Mette Haahr, Birkeroed 2011 O159100 A1 6/2011 Andersen et al. (DK); Jacob Aas Hoellund-Jensen, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Frederikssund (DK); Pemille Kristine Hoeyrup Hemmingsen, Bagsvaerd DE 20 2006 014131 1, 2007 (DK) EP O435,726 8, 1991 EP O493513 7, 1992 EP O406315 11, 1992 (73) Assignee: Egalet Ltd., London (GB) EP 1213014 6, 2002 WO WO 89,09066 10, 1989 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO91,040 15 4f1991 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95/22962 8, 1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 489 days. WO WO99,51208 10, 1999 WO WOOOf 41704 T 2000 WO WO 03/024426 3, 2003 (21) Appl. No.: 12/701,429 WO WOO3,O24429 3, 2003 WO WOO3,O24430 3, 2003 (22) Filed: Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (CASRN 71-55-6) | IRIS
    Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment 1,1,1-Trichloroethane; CASRN 71-55-6 Human health assessment information on a chemical substance is included in the IRIS database only after a comprehensive review of toxicity data, as outlined in the IRIS assessment development process. Sections I (Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects) and II (Carcinogenicity Assessment for Lifetime Exposure) present the conclusions that were reached during the assessment development process. Supporting information and explanations of the methods used to derive the values given in IRIS are provided in the guidance documents located on the IRIS website. STATUS OF DATA FOR 1,1,1-Trichloroethane File First On-Line 03/31/1987 Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Oral RfD (I.A.) Acute Oral RfD (I.A.1.) qualitative discussion 09/28/2007 Short-term Oral RfD (I.A.2.) qualitative discussion 09/28/2007 Subchronic Oral RfD (I.A.3.) yes 09/28/2007 Chronic Oral RfD (I.A.4.) yes 09/28/2007 Inhalation RfC (I.B.) Acute Inhalation RfC (I.B.1.) yes 09/28/2007 Short-term Inhalation RfC (I.B.2.) yes 09/28/2007 Subchronic Inhalation RfC (I.B.3.) yes 09/28/2007 1 Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chemical Assessment Summary National Center for Environmental Assessment Category (section) Assessment Available? Last Revised Chronic Inhalation RfC (I.B.4.) yes 09/28/2007 Carcinogenicity Assessment (II.) yes 09/28/2007 I. Health Hazard Assessments for Noncarcinogenic Effects I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs by Use of Saliva
    REVIEW ARTICLE Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs by Use of Saliva Philip N. Patsalos, FRCPath, PhD*† and Dave J. Berry, FRCPath, PhD† INTRODUCTION Abstract: Blood (serum/plasma) antiepileptic drug (AED) therapeu- Measuring antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in serum or tic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be an invaluable surrogate plasma as an aid to personalizing drug therapy is now a well- marker for individualizing and optimizing the drug management of established practice in the treatment of epilepsy, and guidelines patients with epilepsy. Since 1989, there has been an exponential are published that indicate the particular features of epilepsy and increase in AEDs with 23 currently licensed for clinical use, and the properties of AEDs that make the practice so beneficial.1 recently, there has been renewed and extensive interest in the use of The goal of AED therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is to saliva as an alternative matrix for AED TDM. The advantages of saliva ’ fl optimize a patient s clinical outcome by supporting the man- include the fact that for many AEDs it re ects the free (pharmacolog- agement of their medication regimen with the assistance of ically active) concentration in serum; it is readily sampled, can be measured drug concentrations/levels. The reason why TDM sampled repetitively, and sampling is noninvasive; does not require the has emerged as an important adjunct to treatment with the expertise of a phlebotomist; and is preferred by many patients, AEDs arises from the fact that for an individual patient
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Molecular Action of Direct Gating and Allosteric Modulatory Effects of Carisoprodol (Somartm) on GABA a Receptors
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Assessment of molecular action of direct gating and allosteric modulatory effects of carisoprodol (SomaRTM) on GABA A receptors Manoj Kumar Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Kumar, Manoj, "Assessment of molecular action of direct gating and allosteric modulatory effects of carisoprodol (SomaRTM) on GABA A receptors" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6022. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6022 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASSESSMENT OF MOLECULAR ACTION OF DIRECT GATING AND ALLOSTERIC MODULATORY EFFECTS OF MEPROBAMATE (MILTOWN®) ON GABAA RECEPTORS Manish Kumar, MD, MS Dissertation submitted to the School of Pharmacy at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of Requirements
    [Show full text]